Jan.2005,Volume 2,No.1(Serial No.

2) US-China Education Review, I S S N 1 5 4 8 - 6 6 1 3 ,USA

Traditional Teaching Strategies versus Cooperative Teaching Strategies:

Which Can Improve Achievement Scores in Chinese Middle Schools?

William P. Messier* University of Macau

Abstract: This study examines two teaching styles in Chinese middle schools, traditional lecture-based and
cooperative learning. The study uses simple descriptive statistics to analyze economic status and achievement
scores for both strategies in four Chinese middle schools. There were 145 randomly selected middle school
students involved in the study. The results showed that the participants in the traditional lecture-based group
obtained higher achievement scores during the course of the semester. The paper concludes with some discussion
about the application, implementation and recommendation of traditional and cooperative learning and their
impact on educational leaders, school improvement, educational policy, and educational reforms.
Key words: traditional teaching strategies cooperative teaching strategies achievement scores

1. Introduction

As Chinese educators and administrators move into the 21st century, it is important for some of them to try
new teaching strategies other than the traditional methods. Traditional Chinese instruction places emphasis on the
lecturer and deep learning through memorizing (Marton, Dall’Alba, & Tse, 1996). Cooperative learning strategies
demand a facilitator that transfers greater responsibility for knowledge acquisition, organization and application
from the teacher to the student (McKeachie, 2002). Traditional and Cooperative learning strategies have been
studied for many years, but few studies have been conducted that examine the impacts of both teaching strategies
on Chinese middle school students (Messier, 2003). This study provides data and perhaps valuable insights to help
administrators, leaders and principals with decision-making.
The choice to integrate western cooperative learning strategies into an educational program that is committed
to more eastern traditional style of teaching has its problems. Firstly, the school commits their instructors and
administrators to a challenging task. Cooperative learning represents a major paradigm shift in focus from what is
being taught to what is being learned. Secondly, this shift in focus and accountability is not an opportunity for the
instructor to step back and let things happen. Thirdly, at its finest, very little would get done on the learning level;
at its worst, it could result in real loss for the student’s comprehension of cooperative work. For cooperative
strategies to work, careful planning, inconspicuous observation and evaluation, and preplanned adjustments
(alternative activities) are essential to help learners move consistently forward (Hardwick, 2000).
Effective cooperative teaching strategies are somewhat different from traditional teaching strategies because
they require increasing accountability between individuals. Each participant does a fair share through active
participation with cooperative social skills and successful and appropriate communication skills that bring task to
completion. Western research shows that such cooperative learning practices lead to more efficient and effective

*
William P. Messier, assistant professor, English Communications, University of Macau, Taipa, China, E-mail: wpm@umac.mo

1
Traditional Teaching Strategies versus Cooperative Teaching Strategies: Which Can Improve Achievement Scores in Chinese Middle Schools?

processing increased achievement, positive relationships among students, and efficient exchange of information
(Johnson, Johnson & Smith, 2000). The closer, more frequent student-teacher interaction that is inherent in
cooperative learning provides teachers occasions for reflective examination of individuals and groups, evaluation
of their learning dynamics, and adjustment of instructional plans to achieve the best learning experience for all
students. The direct communication between teacher and student increases teacher satisfaction and gives students
a greater sense of partnership with instructors in the learning process, as well as increasing cognitive, social, and
emotional benefits (National Commission for Cooperative Education, 2003).
In most cases, eastern learning preferences differ from western learning preferences in that there is an
important tendency of the Chinese to believe in knowledge and the power of memorizing, which will lead to
understanding (Marton, Dall’Alba, & Tse, 1996). Other differences in learning preferences include pupils
preferring to work alone rather than in groups, not being asked, or asking questions, to present no overt challenges
to authority, and the belief that there is not much value in peer discussion (Tang, & Williams, 2000). The two
fundamental reasons for these expectations and attitudes with regard to Chinese education are the respect for
superiors and the loyalty to social piety (Pan, Chaffee, Chu, & Ju, 1994).
Today there is an added emphasis on improving goals and outcomes in education. As in most cases around the
world, skilled instructors, principals and administrators will continue to search for effective and reliable
instructional strategies. In China, the lecture is a traditional, common, and familiar teaching technique and can be
fairly effective, especially when a lecturer is well prepared for an oral presentation on topics he/she is qualified to
teach. If executed correctly, cooperative learning teaching strategies can also provide fairly effective learning
outcomes. Today, little is known specifically about how western cooperative learning affects the academic
achievement of Chinese middle school students. This study presents the research findings from an investigation of
145 participating middle school students regarding the question, “In Chinese middle schools which is more
effective for students, the traditional lecture-based teaching strategies or cooperative teaching strategies.”

2. The Study

The major goal of this study is to share the findings about effective teaching strategies with the
participating Chinese schools in Macau, China. Four Chinese middle schools participated in this study during the
summer of 2004. English as a second language was the chosen subject. Ten equally skilled university students
from the Faculty of Education (University of Macau) were trained to teach the pupils by two teaching methods:
traditional lecture (control group) or cooperative learning (treatment group). Each participating school was
randomly assigned two sections of students (control and treatment) and two assigned teachers who taught only the
traditional style or the cooperative learning style. For all the students, total instructional-contact time was 50
hours. A total of 15 lessons (lesson plans, handouts and presentations) on grammar basics were designed and
equally shared so that there were no differences between the teaching content for the treatment and control groups.
Each lesson lasted approximately 2.5 hours, five days a week for four weeks.

3. Methodology

This study was limited to 12-15 year old students (primary 5-7) who were enrolled in the Instituto Salesaino,
the Keang Peng School, the Macau Baptist College (middle school) and the Tong Nam Middle School. All of the
students (treatment and control groups) were randomly assigned from a summer school list and randomly

2
Traditional Teaching Strategies versus Cooperative Teaching Strategies: Which Can Improve Achievement Scores in Chinese Middle Schools?

allocated into two sections per school. Each middle school’s section started out with approximately the same
number of students, 36-42 (a normal class size for students in China). An anonymous survey was developed and
implemented the first day of class to gather information about each student’s background and demographic
factors. Also, on the first day students were pre-assessed and evaluated on grammar basics. Throughout the
semester, four evaluation assessments and one final exam were designed and equally shared so that there were no
differences between the assessment content for the treatment and control groups. The four assessments (50% of
the final grade) were given on every Friday covering previously learned material. The format of the four
assessments included fill-in-the-blank as well as multiple-choice questions. On the last day of class both treatment
and control groups were given the same final exam (50% of the final grade), which comprehensively evaluated the
semester’s work. Since there are many different types of schools (K-12) independent from Macau’s government
schools, there is no designated Macau school system. Therefore, Macau does not have standardized ESL base-line
test scores. For this study, pre-assessment grade scores were used for the base-line data. The assessment exams
were designed to test concepts in grammar basics covered during the participants’ middle school years.
All instructors were randomly assigned from a list of interested teachers and then evaluated for teaching ability. The
selected instructors scored well on the following criterions: academic skills (interpersonal skills, public speaking skills,
and enthusiasm for working with students), instructors teaching in the field of their training (has a specialization in the
field taught/English grammar), and on how well the instructors performed on their induction training program for both
control and treatment groups. The induction-training program trained teachers equally in quality and quantity for both
treatment and control groups. Teachers who used the cooperative learning method were trained to teach pupils in groups
of three or four. These teachers were also taught to make each group member responsible for a unique part of the
group's task and to have students be individually responsible for their own learning. Further, the cooperative learning
teachers were given examples of how students can learn from each other in many ways: by giving and receiving help,
by recognizing and resolving contradictions between their own and other students' perspectives, and by internalizing
problem-solving processes and strategies that emerge during group work (Messier, 2003). Teachers who used the
traditional lecture were also trained in induction workshops to make sure that each instructor was well prepared to
present qualified lectures on each grammar lesson. All instructors for the treatment and control groups were given the
same content materials (PowerPoint slides, handouts and other teaching materials) and used them equally so that there
were no significant differences between teachers. Teachers were randomly selected to teach at the four middle schools.
To answer the hypothesis question, “Can traditional lecture-based strategies be more effective than cooperative
teaching strategies in Chinese middle schools?” A simple descriptive analysis was done to determine differences
between treatment and control groups. The hypotheses are:
Null hypothesis (Ho): The control group is less than or equal to the treatment group.
Alternative hypothesis (Ha): The control group is greater than the treatment group (our objective).
Although this study is not representative of a large sample, its real value is that other educators and
administrators can gather useful information from it. Tables and charts were created to show the demographic
factors and any improvement in scores for treatment and control groups.

4. Demographic Data

Analysis of randomized experimental data does not require controls for background characteristics. Such
controls are necessary only when one doubts that the experimental data are truly random (Trochim, 2002).

3
Traditional Teaching Strategies versus Cooperative Teaching Strategies: Which Can Improve Achievement Scores in Chinese Middle Schools?

Although western research data suggests that economic status, parental control and other social economic
variables can create gaps in student performance (Barton, 2003, Blank, 2003), the demographic data set for this
study may be of interest to the participating Chinese middle schools administrators in Macau, China. All
participants were required to fill in a pre-designed demographic questionnaire. The demographic survey garnered
145 completed questionnaires. After collecting the data, not all students answered every question, however, the
data collected could provide valued information to the decision makers at the schools involved.
Of the 145 students who started the program 50 participants dropped the course, which leaves a sample of 95
students. All 95 students finished the semester studying basic grammar. From the background data, all of the
respondents were Chinese nationals and were either born in Macau (Portuguese-Chinese) or other Chinese
provinces or special administrative regions (SAR) and moved to Macau. 80% of the respondents were born in
Macau, 16% in China, and 4% in Hong Kong. Most of the respondents lived with both parents while 4% - 10%
lived with just one parent, with 1% of the students who did not answer some of the questions.
The student demographic data per school in our treatment and control samples are presented in the first five
columns of Table. Chart 1, also helps describe the demographic data for both treatment and control groups. In
columns (2) and (3) of Table 1, both treatment (90%) and control groups (94%) had large numbers of participants
living with both parents. Columns (4) and (5) of table 1, show that the treatment group (47%) had a lower number
with both parents working than the control group (56%).
Table 1: Middle Schools Student Background and Demographic Factors for Control and Treatment in Percent
(2) (3)
(4) (5)
(1) % Living with % Living with both
% Both parents work % Both parents work
Yes/No both parents parents
(Control) (Treatment)
(Control) (Treatment)
Yes 94.4 89.7 55.6 46.8
No 4.2 10.3 44.4 53.2

Chart 1: Middle Schools Student Background and Demographic Factors for Control and Treatment in Percent
Living with both Parents (Control) Living With Both Parents (Treatment)

100 94.4 100 89.7

90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20 10.3
10 4.2 10
0 0
yes no yes no

Both Parents Working (Control) Both Parents Working (Treatment)

55.6 54 53.2
60
50 44.4 52

40 50
30 48 46.8
20 46
10 44
0 42
yes no yes no

5. Achievement Results

4
Traditional Teaching Strategies versus Cooperative Teaching Strategies: Which Can Improve Achievement Scores in Chinese Middle Schools?

The results reported are from a randomized field study on academic achievements between cooperative learning
and traditional lecture-based teaching strategies within Chinese middle schools in Macau. Although all of the
respondents were Chinese nationals, either born in Macau or other Chinese provinces or special administrative
regions; this study finds that some students who participated had different backgrounds and demographic factors.
Further research may be needed to identify more precisely social economic variables affecting student achievement.
When interpreting the results below, it should also be noted that there are many aspects of the level and quality of
educational resources that may influence student performance, of which teaching method is only one.
Table 4 presents combined descriptive statistics of the dataset. Column (5) describes the standard deviation of
the between-grade difference in both treatment and control groups at 3.5. Column (6) shows the combined
negative P-value at -1.145. As is evident from Table 4, columns (1) and (2), overall mean scores were higher in the
control group (68) than the treatment groups (65). However, the P-value for the t-test was 0.128 and the F-test was
0.973.
In the columns of Table 3, actual average scores and statistical data are reported for each middle school. In
Table 3, column (7), the P-values for the T-test for all individual schools are as follows: Instituto Salesaino (0.090)
and Tong Nam’s (0.421), Macau Baptist (0.400) and Keang Peng (0.258) show the equality in control and
treatment population variances. Also, Table 4, column (8) also indicates this equality of variance for the control
and treatment groups at 0.128.
In column (6) of Table 3, the T-values for Instituto Salesaino (-1.108) and Tong Nam’s (-0.852) were negative.
Conversely, Keang Peng (.202) and Macau Baptist (.212) show positive T-values. In column (5) of Table 3,
standard deviations for both schools’ treatment groups Tong Nam, (9.2) and Instituto Salesaino, (8.2) are lower
than the standard deviation for the schools’ control groups, Tong Nam, (16.9) and Instituto Salesaino, (14.7). Also,
as noted, both treatment groups’ standard deviations were higher for Macau Baptist (15.6) and Keang Peng’s
(19.8) than Macau Baptist (6.0) and Keang Peng’s (13.1) control groups. Column (9) of Table 3 shows the break
down of the averaged pretest scores for treatment and control groups at each school. The Macau Baptist Middle
School (35) and the Tong Nam Middle School (35) had the lowest pretest averages, while Instituto Salesaino
Middle School (51) and Keang Peng Middle School (51) had the highest averages.

Table 3: Itemized Semester Scores and Statistical Data of Cooperative Learning vs Lecture-Based Learning

(2) (3) (5)

(1) (4) (7) (8)
(Control) (Treatment) Standard (6) (9)
Middle Sample p-value p-value
Average Average Deviation t-value Pretest
School Size (N) for t-test for f-test
Scores (N) Scores (N) (C) (T)
Instituto
69.7 (28) 64.7 (12) 40 14.7, 08.2 -1.108 0.090 0.095 50.5
Salesaino
Keang Peng 71.9 (11) 73.3 (12) 23 13.1, 19.8 0.202 0.421 0.244 51.0
Macau
52.7 (7) 54.1 (10) 17 06.0, 15.6 0.259 0.400 0.043 34.6
Baptist C.
Tong Nam 70.6 (5) 65.0 (10) 15 16.9, 09.2 -.852 0.258 0.160 35.1

Table 4: Combined Statistical Data of Cooperative Learning vs Lecture-Based Learning

(1) (2) (4) (7) (8)

(Control) (Treatment) (3) (5)
Standard (6) p-value p-value
Traditional Cooperative Sample Std. Error
Deviation t-value for the f- for the t-
Average Average Size Difference
(C) (T) test test
Scores Scores
68.2 64.7 95 14.5, 15.3 3.500 -1.145 0.973 0.128

5
Traditional Teaching Strategies versus Cooperative Teaching Strategies: Which Can Improve Achievement Scores in Chinese Middle Schools?

6. Generalization and Discussion

One must qualify any generalizations from the result of this single study to the population of the four middle
schools in Macau. Only a small fraction of Macau’s pupils were studied. A larger-scaled vigilant research study
that would involve many more schools and children over a longer time frame within Macau’s middle schools
could conceivably have quite different educational outcomes.
School systems around the world differ in many respects. How ESL standardized base-line data is gathered is
a good example, a common practice in the United States and other countries, yet in Macau, China (due to many
independent schools), not a practice valued as important or practical. Gaps in social economic conditions are
evident in different schools around Macau as Table 1 indicates. Chart 1 indicates that in the control group over
55% of the students had both parents working while the treatment group had over 53%. A small percentage of
control (4%) and treatment (10%) groups did not live with both parents. As noted by the western research, this
could affect student achievement scores (Blank, 2003). Many school districts around the world are just starting to
at least identify that race, income, teacher performance and parent involvement can affect a student’s achievement
(Barton, 2003). Studies in the United States conclude that social economic gaps can affect achievement scores of
some students (The Teaching Commission, 2004, Barton, 2003, Blank, 2003).
Variation in learning preferences is another difference for schools in Macau. Teachers encourage
memorization, and many teachers put less value on students, cooperatively learning, working in groups and
students asking questions from group settings. All of these variables could have significant effect on academic
achievement in school system.
Given these differences, it is not obvious that findings from any particular school or study translate directly
into general principles for other school systems to follow. The data collected met stringent requirements, including
the random sample of students with similar demographic background, age, instructional-content, grade-level as
well as using the same achievement tests. A good deal of time was also taken to make sure that the curriculum
framework was set up to ensure that the test content was appropriate and reflected students’ current curriculum for
both the treatment and control groups. It is very difficult to control the enthusiasm and style of each teacher,
therefore some groups may have a more motivated teacher while other groups may not. In the future, perhaps
having the same teacher instruct both treatment and control groups can help. Also, many of the treatment teachers
lacked training in or personal experience with cooperative learning and were more comfortable using the control
method of instruction. Further study using the same instructors over several semesters could prove useful to
determine if cooperative learning mixed with traditional learning could benefit student’s achievement.
In certain western research studies on achievement and demographic backgrounds (Barton, 2003, Blank &
Shah, 2003, The Teaching Commission, 2004, National Assessment Governing Board US, 2002), there are certain
factors that affect achievement in the classroom and what happens outside the classroom is just as important as
what happens inside. A November, 2003 report by the Educational Testing Service, a research group in Princeton,
New Jersey, USA, looked at fourteen factors that may influence student achievement, including nutrition, teacher
experience, class size, school safety, television/game use and parent support (Barton, 2003). Barton, 2003, infers
that parent support is one of the key factors for student success in the classroom. If we compare some of the
demographic data and the students’ achievement scores, Table 4, columns (1) and (2) show the control group with
higher average achievement (66%) then the treatment group (64%). In this study, the treatment groups had a
higher percentage of students with both parents working and a higher percentage of students’s who were being

6
Traditional Teaching Strategies versus Cooperative Teaching Strategies: Which Can Improve Achievement Scores in Chinese Middle Schools?

raised by a single parent. Could these demographic variables affect student achievement in Macau’s middle
schools? One could infer that student’s in the control group’s could have an advantage over the treatment groups.
One could also infer that in some middle schools in Macau, a student’s economic status has some influence on
academic performance. The data in this one study suggests a possible link to achievement and social economic
conditions. Although further generalizations are beyond the scope of this study, it may be of some importance to
educational leaders in Macau to model this investigation and do further research on social economic factors and
achievement scores.
Except for the Keang Peng and Macau Baptist middle school, all control groups achievement scores were
higher than the treatment groups’ scores. Instituto Salesaino (70) and Tong Nam (71) control group’s had higher
achievement scores than the counterpart treatment groups, Instituto Salesaino (65) and Tong Nam (65). An
interesting note about some schools in Macau, some are very old and well established in society, most notably are
Instituto Salesaino and Tong Nam. These well established schools have been around a long time and are very
traditionally based. These schools do not change their rituals or teaching strategies very often. Also, schools like
Instituto Salesaino and Tong Nam receive pressure from past students and parents who send their children there
expecting instruction and rituals to be the same. Any deviation in instruction or tradition is deemed experimental
and unacceptable. Some of these traditional-based schools in Macau will have higher admittance standards and
limit how many students can enter their schools. As a result, competition from parents to have their children go to
the same school as they did is strong. This practice influences achievement at certain schools in Macau with more
students with stronger attitudes and capabilities in subjects like math, science and English entering the school’s
programs (Messier, 2003).
In column (9) of Table 3, pretest average scores for all the schools were significantly lower than the final
scores. From these averages, Macau Baptist (35) and Tong Nam (35) had the lowest scores while, Instituto
Salesaino (51) and Keang Peng (51) had the highest pretest scores. All 95 students who completed the program
seemed to improve their achievement scores. The students who dropped-out of the program may have a lower
interest rate in learning English as a second language leaving behind the students who did. Further, as Table 3,
columns (2) and (3) shows, all schools experienced drop-outs with Tong Nam and Macau Baptist experiencing the
most and Instituto Salesaino experiencing the least. Very interesting, each school’s treatment groups had more
students completing the program than their control groups, as Table 3, columns (2) and (3) also indicates.
Administrators and educators who seek out new teaching techniques that empower students to be more
responsible may want to explore cooperative teaching methods for their pupils. This exploration is being done in
Singapore, Hong Kong and Taiwan (Tang & Williams, 2000). For many traditionally based schools in Macau,
parent pressure and lack of resources may prevent new teaching strategies from being explored. While it is clear
that certain traditionally based teaching strategies can provide higher achievement scores (Marton, Dall’Alba, &
Tse, 1996), it is hoped that additional research studies will be done in Macau to establish if cooperative learning is
also an appropriate teaching method for their schools.

7. Conclusion and Recommendation

As a consequence, this study provided a unique opportunity to examine traditionally lecture-based schools in
Macau, China. The results from the data show that the mean score of the control group is not significantly higher
than that of the treatment group in each of the four schools and the same conclusion is found for the combined

7
Traditional Teaching Strategies versus Cooperative Teaching Strategies: Which Can Improve Achievement Scores in Chinese Middle Schools?

statistical data as seen in Table 3 and Table 4. Therefore, the Null hypothesis (Ho): The control group is less than
or equal to the treatment group is accepted. The Alternative hypothesis (Ha): The control group is greater than the
treatment group is rejected.
Overall achievement scores were higher in the traditionally lecture-based groups (control) than the cooperative
lecture groups (treatment). Table 4, columns (1) and (2), indicates that the control group’s overall average grade
(68) was higher than the treatment groups (65). In Table 3, columns (2) and (3), individual school’s achievement
scores were mixed between Keang Peng and Macau Baptist and Instituto Salesaino and Tong Nam. Keang Peng
(73) and Macau Baptist (54) treatment groups had higher achievement scores than Instituto Salesaino (70) and
Tong Nam (71), who had higher scores from the control groups. In Table 3, columns (2) and (3) indicate, at
Instituto Salesaino, there is a 5 unit difference in achievement scores between the control and treatment groups,
and this could reject the null hypothesis. However, the chance of error is very high at 0.25%, the p-value is greater
than 0.05 and the sample size is small, therefore, the null hypothesis cannot be rejected. All p-values were high
except at the Macau Baptist School (0.043). Possible reason for this is allowing different instructors to teach both
control and treatment groups. If the same instructor teaches control and treatment groups, student achievement
could be better represented. Also, although all the instructors were randomly assigned from a list of interested
teachers and then evaluated for teaching ability, some qualified teachers for both control and treatment groups
may not have diligently practiced or effectively applied the induction training, therefore contributing to this bias.
With 145 students starting the program and 95 students finishing the program, fifty students had dropped the
course. Among all the schools, Macau Baptist and Tong Nam had the highest student dropout rate, as Table 3,
columns (2) and (3) indicate. The high dropout rate could also be from the teaching style or attitude of the
instructors. Further improvement in keeping students from dropping-out will be needed in future studies. As
mentioned, improved induction training strategies could help solve this problem.
While numerous western studies show the benefits of cooperative learning pedagogy (Council for Exceptional
Children, 2003, Doo, 2000, Hardwick, 2000, Kemery, 2000, The National Center for Education Statistics, 2003
and Thousand, 2001), certain instructional strategies and factors must be met for it to be a rewarding experience or
accepted in a traditional-based program. A skillful facilitator, capable of balancing guidance with flexibility, is one
crucial factor. Another is student groups with the skills, both technical and social, to truly collaborate in the
learning process. When those crucial factors as well as other pedagogical issues come together in a learning
setting, collaborative learning can result in a product exceeding the expectations of the teacher. Presently in
Macau, training of teachers in the use of cooperative learning is viewed experimental and not accepted by many
educational leaders when comparing it to traditional-based learning. Further, resources and community pressures
have slowed the progress of experimental teaching strategies in Macau. For now, traditional teaching methods
work, educators and administrators feel the pressure from parents to succeed and experimental teaching methods
could prove too costly and time consuming for that success. It is hoped that educators who read this study will try
cooperative learning as one of their tools in class. As educators seek to make future decisions about using new
teaching methods, it is hoped that parents, administrators and faculty alike will support each other for its success
and gain valuable perspectives and insights for the decision process.
In the early years of the new millennium, in every country, the imperative to improve educational achievement
is increasing, at the same time, the world in which young people and adults are being educated is changing
radically. Education and the tasks and responsibilities of educational leaders, faculty and administrators are
changing and becoming more demanding. The use of new teaching methodologies, the growth of knowledge

8
Traditional Teaching Strategies versus Cooperative Teaching Strategies: Which Can Improve Achievement Scores in Chinese Middle Schools?

economy, the need to safeguard the environment, increasing insecurity (social, political and economic), are all
changing the nature and purpose of education. These changes have important implications for all educational
leaders, faculty and administrators. Consequently, the all work of researchers in gaining new understandings of the
ways in which schools adopt new teaching methodologies is the more significant. Gaining new understandings in
education may require researchers and administrators to improve existing methodologies or to create new
approaches to their pedagogy, outside the classroom as well as inside.
For this study, research reports and recommendations were administered to the four participating middle schools
and the Department of Education and Youth, to stimulate Macau’s exploration into future pedagogical research and
projects. Demographic data and the findings about this study were also presented in table and HTML format. All
participants were presented with a CD resource kit that included pedagogy reports resources about the study.
The pedagogical report highly recommended that:
Further long-term tracking of students and teachers using cooperative learning and traditional learning
strategies could prove useful to administrators and educational leaders.
Macau’s Department of Education and Youth establishes research centers of data collection for student
achievement.
Demographic students’ databases are created and shared among school administrators and education
leaders.
Macau’s research centers explore and share scientific research studies about teaching and learning
strategies and student achievement.
All schools in Macau create a educational council to effectively and fairly create and share database
information on teaching strategies and achievement
All schools in Macau create a teaching and learning research database network for the effective
implementation of new research, pedagogical methodologies and sharing of information.

References:
1 Barton, P. (2003). Parsing the Achievement Gap: Baselines for Tracking Progress. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Retrieved August 16, 2003, from http://www.ets.org/research/pic
2. Blank, M., Melaville, A. & Shah, B. (2003). Making the Difference: Research and Practice in Community Schools.
Washington, DC: Coalition for Community Schools. Retrieved July 16, 2003, from http://www.communityschools.org/
mtdhomepage.html
3. Council for Exceptional Children. (2003). How Cooperative Learning Works for Special Education and Remedial Students.
Retrieved July 20, 2003, from http://journals.cec.sped.org/EC/Articles/Article-2.pdf
4. Doo, I. (2000). Collaborative Learning Activities Manual. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5 Hardwick, S. W. (2000). Humanizing the Technology Landscape through a Collaborative Pedagogy. Journal of Geography in
Higher Education, 24(1), 123-129.
6 Harris, P. (2000). Using Technology to Create a New Paradigm for a Learner-Centered Educational Experience. Technos:
Quarterly for Education and Technology, Summer, 2000.
7 Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (2000). Constructive Controversy: The Educative Power of Intellectual Conflict.
Change, 32(1), 28-37.
8 Kemery, E. R. (2000). Developing On-line Collaboration. In Aggarwal, A. (Ed.), Web-based Learning and Teaching
Technologies: Opportunities and Challenges (pp. 227-245). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
9 Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G. and Tse, L.K. (1996). Memorizing and Understanding: The Keys to the Paradox. In D. A .E. Watkins
and J.B. Biggs (Eds), The Chinese Learner: Cultural, Psychological, and Contextual Influence. Melbourne, Australia: Australian
Council for Educational Research.
10 McKeachie, W. J. (2002). Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers. Boston, MA:

9
Traditional Teaching Strategies versus Cooperative Teaching Strategies: Which Can Improve Achievement Scores in Chinese Middle Schools?

Houghton Mifflin Company.

11 Messier, W. P. (2002). Learning Cubes: A Model for Online Education. World Conference on E-Learning in Corp., Govt.,
Health., & Higher Education. Retrieved July 21, 2003, from http://dl.aace.org/9710
12 Messier, W. P. (2003). Cooperative Learning: Pedagogical Discussion for Learning Online. International Conference on
Computers in Education 2-5 December 2003. Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre.
13 National Assessment Governing Board US. (2002). Reading Framework for the 2003 National Assessment of Educational
Progress, Department of Education. Washington, DC. Retrieved July 16, 2003, from http://www.nagb.org/pubs/reading_framework/
ch4.html#2
14 National Commission for Cooperative Education. (2003). Executive Forum Report. Retrieved July 08, 2003, from
http://www.co-op.edu/monograph.html
15 New York State United Teachers. (2003). How Kids Learn Best: Scientific Research Sheds Light on Effective Teaching
Strategies. Latham, New York. Retrieved July 18, 2003, from http://www.nysut.org/newyorkteacher/2002-2003/030604learning.html
16 Pan, Zhongdang, Steven H. Chaffee, Godwin C. Chu, and Yanan Ju. (1994). To See Ourselves: Comparing Traditional
Chinese and American Cultural Values. San Francisco, CA: West view Press.
17 Tang, T. and Williams, J. (2000). Who Have Better Learning Styles – East Asian or Western Students? (pp. 318) Proceedings
of the 5th ELSIN Conference, Hertford
18 The National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). The Nation’s Report Card, Writing. Institute of Education Science,
Department of Education. Washington, DC. Retrieved July 16, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/writing/achieveall.asp
19 Smith, B. L. & McCann, J. (2001). Reinventing Ourselves: Interdisciplinary Education, Collaborative Learning, and
Experimentation in Higher Education. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Co.
20 The Teaching Commission (2004). Teaching at Risk: A Call to Action. New York, Retrieved Aug 18, 2004 from
http://theteachingcommission.org/publications/FINAL_Report.pdf
21 Thousand, J. S. (2001). Creativity and Collaborative Learning: A Practical Guide to Empowering Students and Teachers.
Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing Company.
22 Trochim, William M. K. (2002). Two Group Experimental Designs. Department of Policy Analysis and Management.
Cornell University. Retrieved July 16, 2003, from http://trochim.human.cornell.edu/kb/expsimp.htm

(Edited By Qiuhong Chen and Ping Hu)

10