Questions On Crimpro Exam
Questions On Crimpro Exam
Q: The relationship of the victim with the accused was not sufficiently
alleged in the information when it appeared only in the preamble or
caption, not in the body of the information. Is the information sufficient?
Why?
2.Q: State the reason why both qualifying and aggravating circumstances
must be alleged in the information.
4.Q: Who and how shall the crimes of seduction, abduction, or acts of
lasciviousness be prosecuted?
8.Q: State the extent and reason for the exclusivity of the Sandiganbayan’s
jurisdiction? Explain.
9.Q: When may a private individual be within the jurisdiction of the SB?
Explain.
12.Q: On his way to the PNP Academy in Silang, Cavite on board a public
transport bus as a passenger, Police Inspector Masigasig of the
Valenzuela Police witnessed an on-going armed robbery while the bus
was traversing Makati. His alertness and training enabled him to foil the
robbery and to subdue the malefactor. He disarmed the felon and while
frisking him, discovered another handgun tucked in his waist. He seized
both handguns and the malefactor was later charged with the separate
crimes of robbery and illegal possession of firearm. Where should Police
Inspector Masigasig bring the felon for criminal processing? To Silang,
Cavite where he is bound; to Makati where the bus actually was when the
felonies took place; or back to Valenzuela where he is stationed? Which
court has jurisdiction over the criminal cases? (2013 Bar)
13.Q: State the effects of death of the accused after arraignment and
during the pendency of the criminal action. Explain.