100% found this document useful (1 vote)
126 views3 pages

Hydro

This document provides hydraulic data and calculations for designing a bridge over a nala (drainage channel). It includes calculations of discharge using two different methods, soil data, and dimensions for the proposed box culvert design. The maximum discharge calculated is 9.5 cubic meters per second. The recommended design discharge is 5.25 cubic meters per second with a high flood level of 100.094 meters and sill level of 98.694 meters. Scour depth and apron lengths are also calculated.

Uploaded by

SHRISHAILAPPA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
126 views3 pages

Hydro

This document provides hydraulic data and calculations for designing a bridge over a nala (drainage channel). It includes calculations of discharge using two different methods, soil data, and dimensions for the proposed box culvert design. The maximum discharge calculated is 9.5 cubic meters per second. The recommended design discharge is 5.25 cubic meters per second with a high flood level of 100.094 meters and sill level of 98.694 meters. Scour depth and apron lengths are also calculated.

Uploaded by

SHRISHAILAPPA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

HYDRAULIC DATA:

Catchment Area (M) 1.75 Sq km.


Skew (a) 25 Degrees
Nala Bed Level (NBL) 98.994 m
Raft/Sill level of the Bridge/Barrage 98.694 m
HFL 100.094 m
Ryves Co'efficient ( C) 6.800

SOIL DATA
2
Safe Bearing Capacity of Soil (SBC) (as per Dept.) 14.00 t/m
Silt Factor (f) 1

NALA PARTICULARS:
Bed slope of Nala 0.00667
i.e 1 in 150
Manning's Co-efficient (n) 0.033 0.035

DISCHARGE CALCULATIONS:
i) Discharge calculation by Ryves Method:
The flood discahrge is calculated based on
catchment area by Ryve's Method
2/3
Discahrge Q= CM 9.875 Cumecs
Say 9.500 Cumecs

ii) Discharge Calculation by A-V Method At Section 1-1:


The flood discharge is calculated based on Area Velocity Method (A-V Method)
Details of Cross Section of Nala:

Nala Bed Wetted


HFL Depth Avg. Depth Length Area
Sl. Distance Level Perimeter
No
2
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m ) (m)

1 0.000 100.399 100.094 0.000 0.000 - 0 -


2 2.000 100.320 100.094 0.000 0.000 - 0 -
3 4.000 100.264 100.094 0.000 0.000 - 0 -
4 6.000 100.198 100.094 0.000 0.000 - 0 -
5 8.000 100.101 100.094 0.000 0.000 - 0 -
6 10.000 99.996 100.094 0.098 0.049 2.00 0.098 2.002
7 12.000 99.951 100.094 0.143 0.121 2.00 0.241 2.001
8 14.000 99.892 100.094 0.202 0.173 2.00 0.345 2.001
9 16.000 99.678 100.094 0.416 0.309 2.00 0.618 2.011
10 18.000 98.994 100.094 1.100 0.758 2.00 1.516 2.114
11 20.000 100.162 100.094 0.000 0.550 - 0 -
12 22.000 100.100 100.094 0.000 0.000 - 0 -
13 24.000 99.859 100.094 0.235 0.118 2.00 0.235 2.014
14 26.000 99.893 100.094 0.201 0.218 2.00 0.436 2.000
15 28.000 99.958 100.094 0.136 0.169 2.00 0.337 2.001
16 30.000 99.978 100.094 0.116 0.126 2.00 0.252 2.000
17 32.000 100.105 100.094 0.000 0.058 - 0 -
18 34.000 100.29 100.094 0.000 0.000 - 0 -
19 36.000 100.495 100.094 0.000 0.000 - 0 -
18.00 4.08 18.14
2
Area (A) 4.08 m
Wetted Perimeter (P) 18.14 m
Hydraulic Mean Depth ( R )= A/P 0.22 m
2/3 1/2
Velocity (v) based on Manning's formula 1/n x R x S
0.862 m/sec.
Discaharge (Q) = AV 3.517 Cumecs
Say 3.50 Cumecs

HYDRAULIC DATA FOR DESIGN:


As per IRC:SP:13-2004, the recommended rule to estimate the Design discharge is " the highest
of these values is adopted.
By Ryve's Method 9.50 Cumecs
By A-V Method 3.50 Cumecs
Max Discharge 9.50 Cumecs

Recommended Design Discharge 5.25 Cumecs


HFL 100.094 m
Sill Level 98.694 m

HYDRAULIC DATA FOR DESIGN:


Design Discharge adopted 5.25 Cumecs
HFL 100.094 m
Sill Level 98.694 m

BOX DETAILS:
No. of Cells provided (Nc) 1 Nos.
Size of the Vent provided ( a x b ) 3.00 2.00
Earth Cushion ( Ec) 0.00 m
No. of cells considered in group 1 Nos.
No. of such groups provided 1 0
Depth of the Top Slab (d) 0.45 0.45
Depth of the Bottom Slab (e) 0.45 0.45
Depth of the Outer Vertical Slab (f) 0.40 0.40
Depth of the Inner Vertical Slab (g) 0.00 0
Depth of Flow 1.400 m
Therefore, designed water way (L) 3.00 m
Total length of the Bridge 3.80 m
Discharge / m width Q/L 1.17 m3/sec/m

VENT WAY:
1/2
Regime width as per Lacey's Formula (W) C x (Q)
where C= 4.80
Regime width (W) 11.00 m.

SCOUR DEPTH CALCULATIONS:


Regime width > Linear Water Way
The Linear water way (L) provided is less than Regime width of the stream (W)
(As per Cl. 703 of IRC:78-2000 given in IRC:SP:13-2004, Page No. 27)

2 1/3
Normal Scour depth 'dsm' 1.34 x ( Qm / f)
3
Where Qm = Discharge in m /sec per mtr. width 1.17 Cumecs
f = Lacey's Silt Factor 1.2
Normal Scour depth 'dsm' 1.40 m
APRON DETAILS:
As per IRC:SP:13-2004
Length of D/s Apron = 2 times of Normal Scour Depth = 2.79 m
Say 3.00 m

Length of U/s Apron = 1.50 times of Normal Scour Depth = 2.10 m


Say 2.50 m

REVISED DISCHARGE FOR MODIFIED WATER WAY

Sl. Avg.
Distance Nala Bed Depth Length Area Wetted
No Bridge/Road HFL/ FRL Depth
Level Level Perimeter

1 0.000 100.399 100.399 100.094 0.000


2 2.000 100.320 100.32 100.094 0.000
3 4.000 100.264 100.264 100.094 0.000
4 6.000 100.198 100.198 100.094 0.000
5 8.000 100.101 100.101 100.094 0.000
6 10.000 99.996 99.996 100.094 0.098
7 12.000 99.951 99.951 100.094 0.143
8 14.000 99.892 99.892 100.094 0.202
9 16.000 99.678 99.678 100.094 0.416 1.400 3.00 4.200 5.800
10 18.000 98.994 98.994 100.094 1.100
11 20.000 100.162 100.162 100.094 0.000
12 22.000 100.100 100.1 100.094 0.000
13 24.000 99.859 99.859 100.094 0.235
14 26.000 99.893 99.893 100.094 0.201
15 28.000 99.958 99.958 100.094 0.136
16 30.000 99.978 99.978 100.094 0.116
17 32.000 100.105 100.105 100.094 0.000
18 34.000 100.290 100.29 100.094 0.000
19 36.000 100.495 100.495 100.094 0.000
Total = 3.00 4.2 5.80

Area (A) 4.20 m


Wetted Perimeter (P) 5.80 m
Hydraulic Mean Depth ( R )= A/P 0.72 m pertaining to revised nala
2/3 1/2
Velocity (v) based on Manning's formula1/n x R x S
1.995 m/sec.

Discharge (Q) = AV 8.380 Cumecs

Designed Discharge is ok
Height of water is sufficient to discharge floods , Hence O.K.

Vent area provided is Safe

HFL = 100.094 m
Required Vertical clearance 0.90 m
Raft/Sill level of the Bridge/Barrage 98.694 m
Road Top Level 101.219 m

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy