0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views11 pages

Appl Perm File Emerg Motion Portal

The document provides updated guidelines for the Appellate Division regarding emergent applications. It explains that an application must demonstrate the matter is truly emergent by involving irreparable harm on a constrained timeline. It also notes standards are different for applications near or during trial, requiring a prima facie showing of merits. The document cautions against self-generated emergencies and advises applicants must reasonably explain any delays. It clarifies granting filing permission does not automatically result in a stay. After-hours applications require demonstrating immediate harm and relief cannot wait until business hours.

Uploaded by

Kenneth Sanders
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views11 pages

Appl Perm File Emerg Motion Portal

The document provides updated guidelines for the Appellate Division regarding emergent applications. It explains that an application must demonstrate the matter is truly emergent by involving irreparable harm on a constrained timeline. It also notes standards are different for applications near or during trial, requiring a prima facie showing of merits. The document cautions against self-generated emergencies and advises applicants must reasonably explain any delays. It clarifies granting filing permission does not automatically result in a stay. After-hours applications require demonstrating immediate harm and relief cannot wait until business hours.

Uploaded by

Kenneth Sanders
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

NOTICE TO THE BAR

APPELLATE DIVISION GUIDELINES FOR ENTERTAINING


EMERGENT APPLICATIONS

The Appellate Division is updating its August 26, 2015


guidelines setting forth the criteria considered by the court in
reviewing applications for permission to file an emergent motion.
These guidelines clearly explain the standards examined by the
court in its determination of these applications. This notice
includes the new telephone number to reach the Clerk's office, and
sets forth the standards that must be met to make an after-hours
application.

An attorney or litigant who seeks relief on an emergent basis


must contact the Clerk's office at (609)815-2950 ext. 52614 between
regular business hours of 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The Clerk's
office shall arrange for the completion by the applicant of an
application for permission to file an emergent motion in the form
set forth on the Judiciary's website njcourts.gov.

1. What matters are emergent. In deciding if a matter is emergent,


the court considers the nature of the alleged impending harm, in
addition to the time frame in which it will occur. A matter is
not emergent just because something will occur before the court
could normally decide an ordinary motion. The threatened
occurrence must also involve either irreparable injury or some
similar showing that the interests of justice require our hearing
the matter on short notice.

For example, the fact that two parents have a dispute over ordinary
child visitation on an upcoming weekend is not emergent, under
that definition, because the trial court can order that a lost
visitation opportunity be made up at a later time. On the other
hand, a court-ordered requirement to turn over privileged
information is emergent, under that definition, because the
privilege will be destroyed as soon as the documents are disclosed.
In that example, however, the court will also consider whether the
turnover is imminent or whether the trial court has set a deadline
that would allow the court to decide a stay application within
three to four weeks.

2. Deciding the application. In deciding whether to allow the


filing of a short-notice motion, the court ordinarily does not
consider the merits of the proposed motion. That is, the court
considers whether the matter is emergent but does not consider
whether the application for permission to file, itself,
demonstrates that the motion will be meritorious. For example,
the court will not attempt to decide, at the application stage,
whether a tenant seeking permission to file a short-notice motion
for a stay of eviction will ultimately be able to meet the Crowe
v. DeGioia, 90 N.J. 126 (1982), factors.

3. Deciding the application – special situations. The court applies


a different standard to applications filed either on the eve of a
scheduled trial or during the trial. Short-notice appellate
motions filed during a trial, or close to the start of a scheduled
trial, are uniquely disruptive and burdensome to both the adversary
and to the trial court. Additionally, such motions typically
involve interlocutory review of a trial court's order and therefore
must also satisfy the demanding standards for a grant of leave to
appeal. For those reasons, when a case is either in trial or about
to go to trial, the Appellate Division will not grant an
application for permission to file a short-notice motion, unless
the applicant can make at least a prima facie showing that the
proposed motion would satisfy the standards for granting leave to
appeal.

There is, however, an exception to this policy for situations in


which an attorney has been ordered by two different judges to
appear for trial in two different places at the same time. For
example, if an attorney has been ordered on a Friday to appear for
trial in Atlantic County on the following Monday, when the attorney
is already scheduled to appear for trial in Passaic County on that
Monday, the court will ordinarily permit the attorney to file an
emergent motion for relief. That does not, of course, mean that
all such motions will ultimately be granted. It means that the
court will ordinarily permit the filing of a motion for relief on
short notice and then judge each motion on its individual merits.

4. Self-generated emergencies. Emergent applications place a


burden on the adversary and the court to "drop everything" and
turn immediate attention to that application. An applicant who
claims to have an emergency must behave as though the matter is
genuinely emergent. The court will be reluctant to grant permission
for a short-notice filing when the timing of the application
indicates that the applicant is responsible for a "self-generated
emergency." For example, if a trial judge has ordered on June 1
that a defendant must take some action by June 30, and the
defendant waits until June 28 to seek permission to file an
emergent motion, that would be considered a self-generated
emergency unless the defendant provides a good explanation for the
delay.

-2-
In reviewing a last-minute application, the court will consider
whether the applicant has unreasonably delayed filing the
application, to the point where it cannot fairly be heard on short
notice without prejudice to the adversary. The court will, for
example, consider whether the application has been filed so late
(e.g., 4:30 on Friday afternoon seeking a stay of an event due to
occur on Monday morning) that the adversary would not have a fair
chance to file opposition before the court would have to decide
the application. The court may also consider whether its own
schedule allows for consideration of an unreasonably-delayed
application within the time frame sought by the applicant.

Unless an applicant provides a persuasive, written explanation for


the delay, the court may either (a) decline to hear a "self-
generated emergency" application, or (b) set a briefing schedule
that allows the adversary a fair chance to respond, and the court
a reasonable time to decide the motion, even if that schedule
leaves the applicant at risk that the threatened harm may occur in
the interim.

For example, the court would ordinarily allow a tenant to file a


short-notice motion to stay an eviction, if the application is
timely. However, if the tenant waits until late Friday afternoon
to seek permission to apply on short notice for a stay of Monday
morning's impending eviction, the court nonetheless may not
consider the stay application until Monday in order to give the
landlord a fair chance to respond. If the tenant is evicted before
the application is decided, the remedy, if one is appropriate, may
consist of ordering that the landlord let the tenant back into the
premises.

In deciding whether to entertain a last-minute application and on


what schedule, the court will consider the magnitude of the
threatened harm to the applicant if the short-notice motion is not
heard in time to prevent the harm from occurring. In other words,
the court will not mechanically refuse to hear an application
solely because it is submitted late, but will do what is just and
consistent with fairness and common sense.

5. Legal effect of granting permission to file. The fact that the


court grants permission to file a short-notice stay motion does
not, by itself, operate as a stay. In an appropriate case, where
the threatened harm is severe and will occur very quickly, the
court may enter an interim stay to preserve the status quo for a
day or two while the court considers the stay motion. However, the
court will rarely enter a stay in favor of the applicant without

-3-
first hearing from the other side. Litigants who unreasonably
delay filing their applications should not expect to thereby "rush"
the court into giving them an immediate stay without hearing from
the other side.

6. After-hours applications. An applicant who seeks relief after


regular business hours, on holidays or weekends, must be able to
demonstrate that the request for relief cannot wait until the
courts open for regular business, as there is a real and
contemporaneous threat of immediate harm or irreparable injury,
and that there is something the court can do to provide immediate
relief. The applicant must explain what makes it necessary for
the court to consider the emergent application during off-hours.

If the applicant can meet this burden for an after-hours


application, he or she may contact the State Police Operational
Bureau duty trooper at (609)963-6900, option #1. The duty trooper
will then contact the emergent duty judge.

Hon. Carmen Messano


Presiding Judge for Administration
Appellate Division

Dated: March 19, 2018

-4-
Save Form Print Form Clear Form
Superior Court of New Jersey
Appellate Division
Application for Permission to File Emergent Motion
To: Appellate Division Emergent Judge Date:
From: Telephone:

The following questions are to be answered by the attorney or self-represented litigant requesting permission to
file an emergent motion. This questionnaire is designed to assist the court's determination respecting its further
instructions. COMPLETION OF THIS APPLICATION DOES NOT IN ANY SENSE CONSTITUTE
THE FILING OF AN APPEAL OR MOTION. There is no right to be heard orally on an emergency
application. Further instructions will come from the court.

Except by permission of the court, the only documents you may submit with this application are: a copy of the
decision being appealed, any opinion or statement of reasons given by the trial judge or agency, and any order
or decision denying or granting a stay. A copy of this application must be served simultaneously on both your
adversary and the trial judge or agency. No answer shall be filed unless directed by the court.

If the court grants you permission to file an emergent motion and you have not previously filed a motion for
leave to appeal or notice of appeal (whichever is applicable), you must simultaneously file one. See
njcourts.com for notice of appeal and Court Rules. You must also pay the applicable filing fee ($50 for a
motion for leave to appeal; $250 for a notice of appeal), direct the charging of an attorney’s account with the
Superior Court, or file a motion to proceed as an indigent and supporting certification.

Case Name:
Appellate Division Docket Number: (if available):
Trial Court or Agency Docket Number:

1. What is the vicinage of the matter? (i.e., what judge, in what county or what agency entered the
decision?)

2. a) What is your name, address, including any e-mail address, phone number and fax number?

b) Who do you represent? (i.e., client, yourself)

Revised Form Effective 09/14/2015, CN: 10498 page 1 of 5


3. List the names of all other parties and name, address, including any known e-mail address, phone
number and fax number of attorney for each.

4. What is the nature of the emergency?

5. What is the irreparable harm, and when do you expect this harm to occur?

6. What relief do you seek?

7. Do you have a written order or judgment entered by the trial judge or a written agency decision?
You must attach a copy of the order, judgment or decision.

8. a) Have you filed for a stay before the trial court or agency?

b) If so, do you have a court order or agency decision denying or granting same?
Attach a copy of any such order or decision. Before you seek a stay from the Appellate
Division, you must first apply to the trial court or agency for a stay and obtain a signed order
or decision or other evidence of the ruling on your stay application. (Court Rules 2:9-5 and
2:9-7)

Revised Form Effective 09/14/2015, CN: 10498 page 2 of 5


9. If you did not immediately seek a stay from the trial court or agency, or if you did not immediately file
this application with the Appellate Division after the trial court or agency denied your stay application,
explain the reasons for the delay.

10. Are there any claims against any party below, either in this or a consolidated action, which have not
been disposed of, including counterclaims, cross-claims, third-party claims and applications for counsel
fees?
If so, the decision is not final, but rather interlocutory, and leave to appeal must be sought. (Court
Rules 2:2-4 and 2:5-6)

11. If the order or agency decision is interlocutory (i.e., not final), are you filing a motion for leave to
appeal?

12. If interlocutory, are you filing a motion to stay the trial court or agency proceeding?

13. If the order, judgment or agency decision is final, have you filed a notice of appeal?

14. What is the essence of the order, judgment or agency decision?

Revised Form Effective 09/14/2015, CN: 10498 page 3 of 5


15. a) Has any aspect of this matter been presented to or considered by another judge or part of the
Appellate Division by emergent application or prior appeal proceedings? If so, which judge or part?

b) Have the merits briefs been filed in this matter? If so, has the matter been calendared to a part of the
Appellate Division?

16. a) Have you served simultaneously a copy of this application on both your adversary and the trial judge
or agency?

b) If so, specify method of service.

17. a) Have any transcripts been ordered (particularly of the trial judge’s challenged ruling)?

b) If so, when will the transcript(s) be available?

Revised Form Effective 09/14/2015, CN: 10498 page 4 of 5


18. Please give a brief summary of the facts of your case.

19. What legal citation (i.e., statute, regulation, court case) is most important for the proposition that you are
likely to prevail on appeal?

By signing below, I certify that this application is made in good faith, and not for any improper purpose such as
to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or expense. I further certify that the factual statements contained in this
application are true to the best of my knowledge.

Date:
Print/Type Name of Attorney or Self-Represented Litigant

Signature of Attorney or Self-Represented Litigant

Revised Form Effective 09/14/2015, CN: 10498 page 5 of 5


Superior Court of New Jersey
Appellate Division
Disposition on Application for Permission to File Emergent Motion
Case Name:
Appellate Division Docket Number: (if available):
Trial Court or Agency Below:
Trial Court or Agency Docket Number:

DO NOT FILL IN THIS SECTION – FOR COURT USE ONLY


I. The application for leave to file an emergent motion on short notice is Denied for the following reasons:

The application on its face does not concern a threat of irreparable injury, or a situation in which the
interests of justice otherwise require adjudication on short notice. The applicant may file a motion with the
Clerk's Office in the ordinary course.

The threatened harm or event is not scheduled to occur prior to the time in which a motion could be filed in
the Clerk's Office and decided by the court. If the applicant promptly files a motion with the Clerk's Office
it shall be forwarded to a Panel for decision as soon as the opposition is filed.

The applicant did not apply to the trial court or agency for a stay, and obtain a signed court order, agency
decision or other evidence of the ruling before seeking a stay from the Appellate Division.

The application concerns an order entered during trial or on the eve of trial as to which there is no prima
facie showing that the proposed motion would satisfy the standards for granting leave to appeal.

The timing of the application suggests that the emergency is self-generated, given that no good explanation
has been offered for the delay in seeking appellate relief. Due to the delay, we cannot consider a short-
notice motion within the time frame the applicant seeks, without depriving the other party of a reasonable
time to submit opposition. And the magnitude of the threatened harm does not otherwise warrant
adjudicating this matter on short notice despite the delay. If the applicant promptly files a motion with the
Clerk's Office it shall be forwarded to a Panel for decision as soon as the opposition is filed.

Other reasons:

J.A.D. Date
Revised Form Effective 09/2015, CN: 10498 page 1 of 2
Superior Court of New Jersey
Appellate Division
Disposition on Application for Permission to File Emergent Motion
Case Name:
Appellate Division Docket Number: (if available):
Trial Court or Agency Below:
Trial Court or Agency Docket Number:

DO NOT FILL IN THIS SECTION – FOR COURT USE ONLY


II. The application for leave to file an emergent motion on short notice is Granted on the following terms:
A. By no later than , one copy of the motion for emergent relief must be delivered
to the chambers of Judges and , and to all counsel/self-
represented litigants. Copies must also be sent to the trial judge or agency whose decision is being appealed. If
this is a newly-filed appeal, one copy each of the notice of appeal or motion for leave to appeal, and any
indigency motion, must also be delivered to the judges and all counsel/self-represented parties.

The applicant must file the original and one copy of the motion for emergent relief with the Clerk of the
Appellate Division in Trenton, by no later than the day after those papers are due to the judges'
chambers, . If the matter is not yet pending in the Appellate Division, the
applicant must, on that same schedule, file with the Clerk's Office, attention Emergent Applications Unit, the
original and one copy of a notice of appeal or motion for leave to appeal, together with the required fees or a
motion to proceed as an indigent. [Note: This schedule anticipates that copies may be faxed to the judges'
chambers and to adversaries, but they must be overnight mailed or hand delivered to the Clerk's Office. Failure
to file with the Clerk's Office or to submit the required fees may result in dismissal of the appeal and vacating of
any stays granted.]

B. Opposition must be served and filed by no later than .

C. Other terms:

J.A.D. Date

Revised Form Effective 09/2015, CN: 10498 page 2 of 2

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy