Guide - Developing Assessment Tools, Updated 1 April 2015 Page 1 of 11
Guide - Developing Assessment Tools, Updated 1 April 2015 Page 1 of 11
Table of Contents
Introduction __________________________________________________________________________________ 2
What is meant by assessment? _______________________________________________________________ 2
Developing assessment tools____________________________________________________________________ 3
Step 1—Planning __________________________________________________________________________ 3
Types of assessment methods _______________________________________________________________ 5
Step 2—Design and Development ____________________________________________________________ 6
1. Context and conditions of assessment: ________________________________________________ 6
2. Tasks to be administered to the student _______________________________________________ 7
3. An outline of the evidence to be gathered from the candidate _______________________________ 8
4. Evidence criteria used to judge the quality of performance _________________________________ 9
5. Administration, recording and reporting requirements ____________________________________ 10
Step 3—Quality checks ____________________________________________________________________ 11
In summary __________________________________________________________________________________ 11
Further information ___________________________________________________________________________ 11
It is important for RTOs to understand the capacity of the tools they use and adapt these tools to meet their
requirements. This will help ensure confidence in the quality of assessment. It will also ensure that your assessment is
valid, reliable, flexible and fair.
You can also refer to the information in this guide if you are reviewing and contextualising commercially developed
assessment tools.
This guide should be read in conjunction with the Standards for Registered Training Organisations 2015 and the
Users’ Guide to the Standards.
This guide has been produced by the Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) with consideration to previous work
developed by the National Quality Council and the Government of Western Australia, Department of Training and
Workforce Development: Designing assessment tools for quality outcomes in VET, 4th Edition 2013.
1. Planning—What are the assessment requirements of the training package / accredited course? What does
feedback from industry identify? What assessment methods are most appropriate for your learners?
2. Design and development—How does each component of an assessment tool come together?
3. Quality Checks—How to review a tool prior to implementation?
Step 1—Planning
The assessment process is the final stage in confirming a learner has the skills and knowledge to perform an identified
task. In planning for assessment your RTO needs to consider how a learner will:
First, consider the components of the training package or accredited course and identify all of the requirements a
learner needs to show to demonstrate competency. You must address all requirements of the training package or
accredited course; this may mean that multiple and varied assessment methods are required.
Component Description
Elements The essential actions or outcomes which are demonstrable and assessable.
Specifies what the individual must know in order to safely and effectively
perform the work task described in the unit of competency.
Knowledge evidence
The type and depth of knowledge required to meet the demands of the unit
of competency.
Industry consultation is critical as it assists in ensuring the assessment tool aligns to current industry methods,
technologies, products and performance expectations.
Who is your learner cohort? The most appropriate assessment methods depend on the learners you’re
intending to work with. When conducting an assessment, consider every learner’s individual needs. While you
may not know all of a learner’s specific needs, when planning and developing the assessment tools, consider
the general needs of the cohort. For example, it may be more appropriate to consider a portfolio of evidence
for learners who are actively employed and are up-skilling existing competencies.
Who will collect the evidence? For example, a workplace supervisor would be responsible for collecting all
third party evidence, and the learner would be responsible for collecting a portfolio of evidence. Considering
who will collect the evidence guides what instructions are required to accompany the assessment task.
Remember, no matter who collects the evidence for assessment, the assessor always determines
competence.
Where will the assessment be conducted? In many instances, the requirements of the training package or
accredited course determine the assessment conditions. Some units of competency require assessment to
occur in the workplace. Other units recognise that, for reasons of safety, space, or access to equipment and
resources, assessment can take place in simulated conditions which represent workplace conditions as
closely as possible. Once you understand the requirements of the unit or module and have feedback from
industry on the assessment process, you can consider the methods of assessment you use to gather
evidence.
Method Description
The context and conditions of assessment considers those characteristics of the learner cohort that may impact on
performance. For example, an assessment tool could be developed to cater for particular language, literacy and
numeracy requirements; a learner’s workplace experience; or other learner needs that require reasonable adjustment.
The context of the assessment may also take into account assessments already completed, and the competencies
demonstrated in these assessments.
By looking at context you can consider the conditions under which evidence for assessment must be gathered.
Training package requirements and industry consultation may identify conditions to be considered when conducting
assessment such as:
Any conditions should be clarified in the instructions to ensure consistency in the application of the assessment.
The unit CHCECE005 Provide care for babies and toddlers has the following assessment conditions:
Skills must be demonstrated in a regulated education and care service (a physical condition).
In addition, simulations and scenarios must be used where the full range of contexts and situations cannot be
provided in the workplace or may occur only rarely. These are situations relating to emergency or unplanned
procedures where assessment in these circumstances would be unsafe or is impractical (contingencies).
Simulated assessment environments must simulate the real-life working environment where these skills and
knowledge would be performed, with all the relevant equipment and resources of that working environment.
(equipment requirements, relationship requirements, and timeframes).
Assessment must ensure use of:
o National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care
o the relevant approved learning framework under the National Quality Framework for Early Childhood
Education and Care (specifications).
Assessment must involve:
o interactions with actual babies and toddlers under the age of 24 months under the supervision of an
early childhood educator (equipment requirements, physical conditions, relationships).
Assessors must satisfy the NVR/AQTF mandatory competency requirements for assessors (specifications).
Assessment tools you develop for this unit must reflect these assessment conditions. All skills must be demonstrated
in a regulated education and care service, where the learner will demonstrate those skills either in a real-time working
environment or in a simulated off-the-job situation that reflects the workplace. Regardless of whether the assessment
is conducted in real time or in simulation, the tasks must reflect framework requirements and the resources for
assessment must include actual babies and toddlers (not a simulated doll). Your assessment tool must ensure that the
person making the determination of competence is an assessor who meets the requirements of the Standards for
Registered Training Organisations 2015.
The unit CHCECE005 Provide care for babies and toddlers requires some of the following
performance evidence:
There must be demonstrated evidence that the candidate has completed the following tasks:
o provided care to at least three different babies and toddlers of varying ages using
safe and hygienic practices, including:
assessing and responding appropriately to babies’ needs, including hunger,
distress, tiredness and pain
setting up a safe environment conducive to rest
changing nappies
heating breast milk and formula, preparing bottles and preparing and heating
food
cleaning equipment and utensils, and
feeding babies.
To provide instruction to the learner about demonstrating the Performance Evidence, the task
information should clarify if assessment is conducted in real-time or in simulation (with an actual baby
or toddler), where the assessment will occur, when the assessment will occur, who will conduct the
assessment, and what the learner will be assessed against.
If a learner is observed by an assessor, the outline of the evidence should clarify what the assessor will look for during
the observation. An ‘observation checklist’ could be appropriate in this instance. You should also communicate to the
learner if the observation is being recorded by audio or video.
For the unit CHCECE005 Provide care for babies and toddlers, an RTO must ensure that all skills are
demonstrated. Instructions to the learner must clarify: how they will demonstrate each skill, and who
they will demonstrate these skills to.
Where a skill is not observed by the assessor, you should provide instructions to guide the learner on
how they can collect the evidence (e.g. by the provision of work samples) and how then to submit the
evidence to the assessor for determination.
The evidence criteria ensure the intent of the assessment tool is met and that the learner is able to demonstrate they
have valid, sufficient, authentic and current skills and knowledge relevant to the unit. The criteria confirms the
evidence provided by a learner:
For the unit CHCECE005 Provide care for babies and toddlers, where performance evidence is
assessed by direct observation in the work place, your RTO could develop an observation checklist to
judge and record candidate observations.
An assessor could then record their observations of the learner’s performance directly onto this
checklist. Instruct the assessor to record his/her observation on the checklist during or after the
observation.
The checklist needs to allow the assessor to record when s/he has not had the opportunity to observe
the learner demonstrating the skills and knowledge in real time in the workplace. The tool also needs
to include instructions on how to treat items not observed so the assessor can then assess these
items in simulation.
The checklist should also allow for an assessor to record the number of instances, the period of
observation, and any defining resources used to demonstrate the learner has - provided care to at
least different three babies and toddlers of varying ages.
Where possible retain the actual piece(s) of work completed by the learner. The completed evidence criteria may be
sufficient where it is not possible to retain the student’s actual work. However, you must ensure that the retained
evidence has enough detail to demonstrate the judgement made of the learner’s performance against the standard
required.
Each assessment tool should require an assessor to provide feedback to the learner, both where competency has
been demonstrated and where further evidence is required. Providing feedback shows fairness in the assessment
process and allows a learner to understand why a result was awarded.
Every RTO has its own internal processes and procedures to manage administration, recording and reporting
requirements. Your assessment tools must be designed to comply with these processes.
Further consultation with industry will confirm if the content of the tool is correct and relevant to the workplace.
Industry representatives could critique the tool for its:
o clarity
o content accuracy
o relevance, and
o appropriateness of language for the learners.
Reviewing the tool with other trainers and assessors, who may not be industry experts but who have current
skills and knowledge in vocational training, learning and assessment—including competency based training
and assessment), can check whether:
o the tools will address all assessment requirements of the training package or accredited course
o the level of difficulty is appropriate to the unit or module
o the tools will enable effective collection of evidence, and
o you have provided clear instructions are which can be easily understood by the learner, third party
and assessor.
Trialling the tool before it is used by learners tests the effectiveness of the tool without affecting a learner.
When trialling a tool, select a group of individuals who have similar characteristics to, and levels of ability of,
the target learner group. The findings of the trial will help predict whether the tool would:
o be cost effective to implement
o be engaging to the learner, and
o produce valid and reliable evidence.
In summary
For your RTO to meet the Standards you need to have assessment tools that ensure assessment is valid, reliable and
flexible. It is important for your RTO to understand the capacity of the tools they use and adapt these tools to meet
their requirements. This will help ensure confidence in the quality of assessment.
When developing assessment tools there are three main steps:
1. Planning—What are the assessment requirements of the training package / accredited course? What does
feedback from industry identify? What assessment methods are most appropriate for your learners?
2. Design and development—How does each component of an assessment tool come together?
3. Quality Checks—How to review a tool prior to implementation?
Further information
Standards for Registered Training Organisations 2015—clauses 1.8-1.12