Research Project Online Infidelity and Relationships
Research Project Online Infidelity and Relationships
Relationships have been around for as long as human beings have been on the planet.
Some of the relationships were out of necessity, while others were a choice between
individuals. Modern advancements in technology and the widespread use of the internet makes
it simple for people to form friendships, romances, and even business partnerships. While
access to modern technology has been positive and beneficial in forming and keeping
relationships, it also has the potential to ignite love affairs. The considerable amount of debate
ONLINE INFIDELITY AND RELATIONSHIPS 2
as to what actually defines online infidelity has been settled by well-known psychologist Monica
Whitty (2008) in that cyber-sex is, in fact, cheating. The participants in her study considered
online emotional intimacy with another person to be the ultimate betrayal. The question left to
answer now, is how are the actions of an online love affair, whether it be emotional and/or
Like offline affairs, those that take place over the internet involve secrecy and lies that
can potentially destroy the trust that keeps the relationship together. A study by psychologist
Jennifer Schneider (2012) and her colleagues for the Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity journal
gives further insight into the damaging and emotional impacts of those affected by online
infidelity. In analyzing the data of the 34 participants in committed relationships and victims of
online infidelity, 30 participants felt that their partners' behavior has negatively impacted their
offline relationships. Most reported a loss of trust due to their partners' deception as some
participants state, “‘I cannot trust him at all,’ and ‘Trust has been SHATTERED beyond belief’”
(Schneider, 2012, p. 130). Schneider’s (2012) study confirms that a great deal of emotional
trauma and distrust is experienced by the affected partner and her findings have been similar to
other researchers.
Among other researchers who have examined online infidelity are licensed marriage and
family therapists Jaclyn Cravens, Kaitlin Leckie, and Jason Whiting (2013). In an article
published in the Contemporary Family Therapy journal, they analyze 90 stories written by the
process model of which the victim undergoes when dealing with such situations. It revealed
strong reactions in the discovery phase of their partners’ Facebook infidelity, reporting most
participants “going through a diverse array of emotional experiences and uncertainty about the
future of the relationship” (Cravens, 2013, p. 87). Feelings of devastation, violation of trust,
shock, and anger were some of the arrays of emotions stated to be experienced by the
ONLINE INFIDELITY AND RELATIONSHIPS 3
aggrieved partner. The study finds that learning about a partner’s Facebook infidelity behaviors
Diving deeper into the complex and emotional process, Professors Gabriel Cavaglion
and Etty Rashty (2010) from Ashkelon Academic College, School of Social Work explored the
idea of ambivalent emotions and ambiguous loss. Their qualitative study looked into the
experiences of Italian women dealing with their partners' problematic online sexual behaviors.
The narrative analysis took 1,130 messages written by these women from two self-help online
forums. Data analysis showed patterns of distress, mainly related to ambivalent emotions and
ambiguous loss. These women feel as if their deceitful partners are “physically present but
psychologically absent” (Cavaglion, 2010, p. 277) from the relationship, leaving them helpless
and likely to suffer from depression, anxiety, and further conflicts in their relationships. This
state of perplexity is experienced as they are left confused and in complete shock as to how and
why this is happening to them. This finding plays to be true in other research studies as they try
A recent study published in the Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy by psychologist
Andreas Vossler and Naomi Moller (2020) made a similar conclusion. Their study involved
surveying 160 mature adults with long histories of being in a relationship and with personal
experiences of online infidelity. This thematic analysis brought to light an interesting finding
surrounding the idea of “the internet creates confusion” (Vossler, 2020, p. 72). The internet
allows individuals to hide certain aspects of their real identity and explore new behaviors that
otherwise they would not in their offline relationships. This has created confusion and distress
about the real identity of their partners and has left the grieving partner to question the
authenticity of their relationship and its history. It has been found that with trying to make sense
of the confusion, betrayal, and loss, the aggrieved partner struggles to find reasonable answers,
As long as there are personal relationships, there will be the possibility of infidelity in
those relationships. While many are aware of the prevalence of infidelity in current society,
research has made it evident that technology plays a leading role in developing and sustaining
online love affairs. What is more significant, and perhaps more profound, is the detrimental
effects online infidelity has created for offline relationships. Although more research has been
published in the last few years about perception, attitudes, and the impacts of online infidelity,
there are still many unanswered questions concerning this problem. As such, additional
research on this topic is important and highly recommended. Specifically, further studies on the
non-affected partner’s perceptions and attitudes could answer why they partake in such
behaviors, potentially giving their partners clarity and healing in the answers they have been
References
Cavaglion, G., Rashty, E. (2010). Narratives of suffering among Italian female partners
of cybersex and cyber-porn dependents. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity: The Journal
https://doi.org/10.1080/10720162.2012.658344
https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2019.1654577
Whitty, M. & Quigley, L. (2008, September 30). Emotional and sexual infidelity offline and in
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2008.00088.x