Axial Dispersion in A Pulsed Plate Column
Axial Dispersion in A Pulsed Plate Column
n i . H . I . BAZRD
Chemical Engineering Department, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
A technique involving the indicator colour change in an acid- On a employ6 une mhthode baste sur le changement de
base reaction has been used to measure axial dispersion coeffi- couleur d'un indicatenr dans une rhction entre acide et base
cients in a 15 cm diameter pulsed column. Data have been pour dhterminer les coefficients de dispersion adale dans une
obtained mainly for single phase (aqueous) flow with two colonne pulste de 15 centimetres de diamhtre. On a obtenu des
different types of plate at two different spacings. With coarsely informations, surtout en ce qui a trait i un 6couIement en
perforated plates, the dispersion coefficient is proportional to phase simple (aqueuse) impliquant deux sortes de plaques et des
(amplitude)* times frequency, but semicircular unperforated kcartements diffbrents. Dans le cas des plaques i grosses ouver-
baffle plates show a dependence on amplitude times frequency. tures, le coefficient de dispersion s'est avtrt proportionnel
These results are critically compared with published data, and l'amplitude au c a r d rnultiplihe par la frkquence; cependant, on
two types of flow regime for axial dispersion are indicated. a constatk que les plaques en chicane semi-circulaires et non
perforkes dhpendaient de I'amplitude multiplik par la frhquence.
On fait une comparaison critique entre les r h l t a t s obtenus et
ceux qui ont dtji &t publib, et Yon indique deux types de
A xial mixing tends to reduce the effectiveness of
any countercurrent mass transfer process, by
flattening the axial concentration gradients in each
systhme d'kcoulement pour une dispersion axiale.
1 1 1
alkali
alkali mKn,CZ3
8, I I
1
03 0.5 I.0 2.0 50
amplitude A, cm A’ f , c m2/s
I+
5 x
++ ++ + +
x
+ +
x x x*tX xx
++ +
,','b 8
A
0.5- 0 '
I 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 05
,,4J
d h p m d phse vabcity %, c d s
about 50% of A f , but no significant effect of u, on spacing (2.73 cm) because eddies formed at one plate
E is observed. The characteristic velocity must also would be broken up by an adjacent plate.
depend on plate geometry because of possible jet or The effect of increasing the spacing between the
vortex formation, but for a given plate geometry we perforated plates is to reduce the apparent scale E I A f .
assume that the character.istic velocity is proportional In the experiments it was noted visually that the
to A f . turbulence seemed less intense midway between the
plates, and i t can be concluded that the eddies formed
Characteristic length a t the plates tended to break down to smaller sizes
There are several factors which could contribute in the poorly agitated regions between plates. The ef-
t o a "characteristic length" for dispersion in a pulsed fective scale E / A f a t H = 5.30 cm is somewhat re-
plate column. By analogy with pipe flow, the column duced at lower frequency, perhaps because the eddies
diameter D could be important, particularly for small have more time in which t o break up between velocity
diameter columns. The plate spacing H , the plate maxima. At a very large spacing, laminar zones could
thickness, and the diameter d and the pitch of the even exist between plates, leading to virtually no
holes could be significant. Finally, the amplitude A mixing. A model incorporating the idea of non-uniform
of pulsation could affect the size of the eddies. mixing has been proposed by N ~ v o t n y ' ~and
' success-
Time did not permit the variation of all six of fully tested with results for plates with small perfora-
these lengths. The nearest approach to a thorough in- tions ( d = 1.5 - 3 mm) and small open areas (a <
vestigation on these lines was made by Mar and Babb'3' 14.6%). However the model postulates an equal effect
who carried out an analysis of variance on the results of either amplitude or frequency on the dispersion
of factorially designed experiments. However, their coefficient, whereas the present results showed a
conclusions have been criticised by subsequent in- stronger effect of amplitude than frequency.
v e s t i g a t o r ~ ' ~The
~ ~ ' .main length variable in the present Several previous i n ~ e s t i g a t o r s ' ~ ~have
~ * ' ~ ' found a
work was the amplitude A , with two plate spacings direct proportionality between the dispersion coef-
(H)used for each type of plate. The single phase ficient and the characteristic velocity ( A f plus a
data is therefore presented in Figure 8 with the dis- small term for u,). For the special case where uc <<
persion scale (defined as E I A f ) plotted against am- A f , the relationships between EIAf and other vari-
plitude for different plate designs and spacings. ables can be simply summarised in Table 2. The cor-
relation of Novotny(J) is also given in its limiting
Perforated plates form for u, -+ 0.
The data for perforated plates (lower portion of Even with the effects of continuous phase flow rate
Figure 8) show an approximately linear relationship omitted, the orr relations'^^^^^^'^^ do not agree well. There
between E / A f and amplitude. The dotted line, drawn is a discrepancy on whether E / A f increases with plate
for E I A f = A , approximately represents most of the spacing H(7,8,10'or de~reases'~). The fraction of free
data a t 2.73 cm spacing. However, at the highest area u is found to have a positive effect on EIAf"'
attainable amplitudes, in the region of 3 cm, the scale or a negative one",". An increase in column diameter
E I A f seems to level off. It is believed that the scale has been claimed to decrease EIAf'", to have no ef-
of the turbulence a t higher amplitudes would reach fect"" or to increase it"', although the latter authors")
a limiting value of the same order as the plate-to-plate just included D in their correlation without varying
The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol. 52, December, 1974 755
Experimental details
~- --- - Correlation for EIAf
---
Source and
reference
Novotny (5, *
col. dia.
I
D, cm
hole dia.
5.16
j
1
d, cm
0.15,
0.25,
0.2,
0.3
-I1 --____
spacing
H, cm
2.5 to 15
free area fraction
0.029 to 0.16
_-
(H
(cm)
0.15 Hd
- 4.5) o3Ia
where H > 4.5 cm
- __----
Miyauchic’)
RozenW
__-
3.2,
10
5.4
--
0.15,
-
0.15,
0.3
0.3
9 values from 1 to 10
0.095, 0.23,
0.19
0.32 6 ( ;:ID r3
1.7 d ( H / D ) 2 / 3/ a
d’’3
KaganP”
-___
1
I
I
I
--__--
0.21 1
I
5 only
5, 10,15
I
-
0.087
__
I
0.98 HO.76
756 The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol. 52, December, 1974
basic types of flow regime for single phase pulsed K = constant, Equations (5) and (6)
columns are postulated : I = eddy scale
= time
(a) Hindered eddy regime. The size of eddy which u = superficial velocity
would be produced a t a single isolated plate (or piece z = distance from injection plane (Figure 1 )
of packing) is larger than the spacing between the 2, = value of I where colour changes
plates (or the packing size). In this regime, the dif- Creek Zetters
fusion scale EIAf is limited by, and approximately
proportional to, the spacing or the packing size. Ex- u = fraction of free area in plate
amples of th i s regime exist in pulsed packed
and in pulsed plate co1umns“~8~’o’ where fast, persistent Subscriet
jets of liquid forming a t each cycle correspond to o = inlet streams
large eddies. = acid
(b) Free eddy regime. This regime is less well- = alkali
known than regime (a) and probably confined to plate 3 = outlet stream
= continuous phase
columns. The eddy produced a t the plate is smaller d = dispersed phase
than the plate spacing, so the diffusion scale is primar-
ily proportional to this eddy size which is in turn
proportional to amplitude for a given plate geometry. References
An increase in plate spacing allows the eddies to (1) Misek, T. and Rod, V. in “Recent Advances in Liquid-Liquid Ex-
traction” (C. Hanson, ed.), p. 197 (Pergamon Press, Oxford,
break up appreciably, so the dispersion scale E I A f 1971).
In&&, J.. ibid. p. 237.
declines with an increase in H. An example of this Mar, B. W. and Babb. A. L., Ind. Eng. Chem., 51, 1011 (1969).
regime is seen in Figure 8 for t h e perforated plates. Sehmel. G. A. and Babb. A. L.. Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev.,
3. 210 (1964).
Intermediate behaviour between regimes ( a ) and Novotny. P., Prochazka, J. and Landau, J., Can. J. Chem. Eng..
48. 405 (1970).
(b) occurs when the size of the formed eddies is Kagan, S. Z., Aerov, M. E., Lonik, V. and Volkova, T. S.. Intl.
similar to the plate spacing. In such cases, the disper- Chem. Eng.. 5. 656 (1966).
Miyauchi. T. and Oya, K., AIChE Journal, 11 896 (1966).
sion scale EIAf could increase weakly with both am- Rozen, A. M.. Rubezhnyi, Y. G. and Martynov, B. V.. Khim.
Prom, 46 (1) 13” (1970).
plitude and plate spacing. An example of this is seen Barame. S.. Molinier, J. and Angelino. H.. Can. J. Chem. Eng.,
in Figure 8 for the semicircular baffles. 51, 166 (1973).
Kagan, S. Z., Veishein. B. A., Trukhanov. V. G. and Muzychenko.
A general prediction of axial dispersion coeffi- L. A. Intl. Chem. Eng, 13, 211 (1973).
Elenkbv, D., Boyadzhiev, b.. Naplatanova. M. and Atanasova, E.,
cients in pulsed columns, even for the simple case of Isv. Otd. Khim. Nauki. Bulg. Akad. Nauk. 3 (3). 419 (1970).
single-phase flow, will require knowledge of how the Northrup, E. F., Nature, 88. 463 (1912).
Fox, E. A. and Gex, V. E., AIChE Journal. 2. 539 (1966).
initial eddy size depends on plate geometry, column Tyroler. G., Hamielec, A. E., Johnson, A. I. and LeClair. B.P.,
Can. J. Chem. Eng.. 49. 56 (1971).
diameter, etc. as well as amplitude. More data is also Sherwood T. K. and Pigford R. L., “Absorption and Extraction”.
needed on the breakdown of eddies in the spaces be- pp. 332-387, 2nd Edn. ( M c G 1 . i ~Hill, New York, 1962).
Karr, A. E., AIChE Journal, 5, 446 (1969).
tween plates. It is hoped that the acquisition of more La. T. C. and Karr, A. E., Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev., 11.
data on different types of plate a t different spacings A96 ~-~.-,
-”- 119791
(18) Report on Achema 1973, Chem.-1ng.-Tech., 45. 1343 (1973).
and column diameters, particularly in regime (b) , will (19) Baird, M. H. I., Proc. AIChE 1.Chem.E. Symp.. London, p. 6 5 3
(1966).
eventually lead to a general quantitative correlation. (20) Baird, M. H. I. and Ritcey, G. M., Paper presented a t International
Considerable work is needed because of the large num- Solvent Extraction Conference, Lyon, France (1974).
(21) Towell. G. D. and Ackerman, G. H..European Symp. o n Chemical
ber of variables comprising the plate geometry. Reaction Engineering. 6th Amsterdam, Preprints p. B 3-1, Elsevier
Acknowledgments
This work was carried out a t the Chemical Engineering Department,
University of Queensland, during the author’s sabbatical leave. He is
grateful to the University of Queensland for a Post-Doctoral Research
Fellowship and to the National Research Council of Canada for a
Travel Grant. H e is also grateful to the technical staff of the Chemical
Engineering Department for their skilled assistance in the design and Manuscript received May 15 ; accepted for publication August 17, 1974.
construction of the apparatus, and to the secretarial staff for the
typing of the manuscript for this paper. Finally, he is grateful to
t h e academic staff, notably Dr. R. G. Rice, f o r stimulating discussions.
This paper was presented at t h e 24th Canadian Chemical Engineer-
ing Conference, Ottawa, October 1974.
Nomenclature
A = amplitude
* * *
c = concentration (molar)
d = diameter of holes in plate
D = diameter of column
E = axial dispersion coefficient
f = frequency
F = function, Equation (19)
H = plate spacing