Project Management: Source: OSCM - Chase and Jacobs, MC Grawhill Education, - Chapter-4
Project Management: Source: OSCM - Chase and Jacobs, MC Grawhill Education, - Chapter-4
4-2
Project life cycle
During this phase, the organization realizes that the project may be needed or the
organization is requested to propose a plan to perform a project for some customer
During this phase the project manager plans the project to a level of detail , sufficient
for initial scheduling and budgeting
If the project gets approval ,detailed scheduling and budgeting is done in his phase
• Organization phase
During this phase , a detailed project definition such as the work break down
structure is examined and resources necessary to accomplish the project are
made available
• Execution phase
During this phase the various activities planned are completed as per the
schedule, utilizing allotted resources
• Termination phase
The project is terminated after completion. The personnel who were working in
the project are assigned back to their regular jobs or to other jobs in the
organization or to the other projects
Project Structure
Pure Project
Functional Project
• Responsibility for the project lies within one functional area of the
firm
• Employees from that area work on the project, usually only part-time
Matrix Project
• Duplication of resources
• Organizational goals and policies are ignored
Disadvantages • Lack of technology transfer
• Team members have no functional area
"home"
4-6
Source: OSCM , Chase and Jacobs, Chapter -4
Functional Project Structure
•A team member can work on several projects
•Technical expertise maintained in functional area
Advantages •Functional area is “home” after project completed
•Critical mass of specialized knowledge
4-7
Source: OSCM , Chase and Jacobs, Chapter -4
Matrix Project Structure
•Better communications between functional areas
•Project manager held responsible for success
Advantages •Duplication of resources is minimized
•Functional “home” for team members
•Policies of the parent organization are followed
4-8
Source: OSCM , Chase and Jacobs, Chapter -4
Project Matrix Structure
4-10
Work Breakdown Structure
Level
Program
1 Project 1 Project 2
• CPM was developed for scheduling maintenance shutdowns at chemical processing plants owned
by Du Pont
• CPM was developed on the assumption that project activity times can be estimated accurately
and that they do not vary
• Thus with CPM a single estimate for activity time was used that did not allow for any variation in
activity times –activity times were treated as if they were known for “certain” or “deterministic“
• If any one of the activity is delayed in the critical path , the entire project is delayed
• CPM –used for construction projects such as bridges, buildings etc.
PERT
• Developed by US Navy, Booz, Allen & Hamilton in 1958
• They developed similar network approach for the design of a management control system for the
development of Polaris Missile Project comprising of 23 project networks and 3000 activities
• PERT is a technique for scheduling and controlling the projects where activities are subject to
considerable degree of uncertainty in the performance time for activities that had never been done
• With PERT multiple time estimates were used for each activity that allowed for variation in activity times
When activity times vary, a single time estimate may not be reliable
a = Optimistic time
m = Most likely time
b = Pessimistic time
𝑎+4𝑚+𝑏
ET = Expected time 𝐸𝑇 = 6
The 4 and 6 are constants
𝑏−𝑎 2
σ2 = Variance𝜎2 = 6
The 6 is a constant
Time-Cost Models and Project Crashing
• A time-cost model extends the CPM model to consider the trade-off
between time required to complete an activity and total project cost
• Considers direct activity costs, indirect costs of project, and activity completion times
• It is often referred to as “crashing” the project to reduce overall duration
• On the one hand, it costs money to expedite an activity
• On the other hand, it costs money to sustain (or lengthen) the project
• Costs associated with expediting activities are termed activity direct costs
• Costs associated with sustaining the project are termed project indirect
costs
4-23
Time-Cost Models and Project Crashing
• A time-cost model extends the
CPM model to consider the
trade-off between time required
to complete an activity and total
project cost
• It is often referred to as
“crashing” the project to reduce
overall duration
4-24
Project Crashing steps