Beta and Gamma
Beta and Gamma
GAMMA
FUNCTIONS
Beta function
The first eulerian integral
where m>0, n>0 is called a Beta function
and is denoted by B(m,n).
The quantities m and n are positive but not
necessarily integers.
Example:-
Properties of Beta Function
Other results
Relation between beta and gamma function
Thus, we have…
R. I. Badran The Error Function Mathematical Physics
x
function y e
2
x
2
t 2
erf ( x) e dt
1. 0
.
x t2
1 1 1 x
P(, x)
2 e
2
dt erf ( )
2 2 2
Proof: Put t 2u and proceed, you might reach a step of
x
1
e
u 2
P(, x) P(,0) P(0, x) , where
P(0, x) du
0
1 x
Here you can prove that
P(0, x) erf ( ) . This can be
2 2
done by using the definition of error function in (1).
0
I e u du . To find
2
I
Now you need to find P(,0) where
this integral you have to put u=x first, then u= y and multiply
the two resulting integrals. Make the change of variables to
polar coordinate you get
R. I. Badran The Error Function Mathematical Physics
0 2
I e r
rdr d
2
2
0
From this latter integral you get
1
I and P(,0) .
2 2
1 1 x
P(, x) erf ( ) Q. E. D.
2 2 2
x
1 t
2
1 x
2 0
2.b P(0, x) e 2
dt erf ( )
2 2
(as proved earlier in 2.a).
2
dt 1 erf ( x)
t
erfc ( x)
2
e
x
Proof: Put t2= u and use the definition (1) of error function
and the definition of (1/2).
x 2 t 2 2
3. b) erfc (
2
)
x
e dt
Stirling’s Formula:
This is an approximated formula for the factorial or Gamma
function that can be used to simplify formulas involving
factorials.
n!~ n n e n 2n
OR
( p 1) ~ p p e p 2p
The sign ~, here, means asymptotic to.
Starting with
( p 1) p! x p e x dx and rewrite the
0
integral as
R. I. Badran The Error Function Mathematical Physics
( p 1) p! e pnx x dx .
0
For large p, the second logarithm on the right hand side of the
last equation can be expanded as follows:
y y y2
n(1 )
p p 2p
2
y
( p 1) p!~ pe pnp p e 2 dy
p
The integral and its cofactor can be rewritten as:
R. I. Badran The Error Function Mathematical Physics
2
y p y2
( p 1) p!~ p p pe p [ e 2
dy e 2 dy ] .
2
y
Exercise: Show that e 2 dy 2
p y2
( p 1) p!~ 2p p p e p p p pe p e 2 dy
The integral in the last term tends to zero as p -
( p 1) p! ~ p p e p 2p Q.E.D
(This Stirling's formula is a good approximation for large p)
1 1
( p 1) p!~ p p e p 2p (1 2
)
12 p 288 p
so:
1 1 1
2 3 4 e = 1 + 1 + 2! + 3! + 4! + ...
x x x
ex = 1 + x + + + + ... P∞ (17x)n ∞
X
17n xn
2! 3! 4! e (17x)
= n=0 n! = n!
n=0
∞
X xn
= x∈R
n=0
n!
1
Math 142 Taylor/Maclaurin Polynomials and Series Prof. Girardi
Fix an interval I in the real line (e.g., I might be (−17, 19)) and let x0 be a point in I, i.e.,
x0 ∈ I .
Next consider a function, whose domain is I,
f: I →R
and whose derivatives f (n) : I → R exist on the interval I for n = 1, 2, 3, . . . , N .
Definition 1. The N th -order Taylor polynomial for y = f (x) at x0 is:
f 00 (x0 ) f (N ) (x0 )
pN (x) = f (x0 ) + f 0 (x0 )(x − x0 ) + (x − x0 )2 + · · · + (x − x0 )N , (open form)
2! N!
which can also be written as (recall that 0! = 1)
f (0) (x0 ) f (1) (x0 ) f (2) (x0 ) f (N ) (x0 )
pN (x) = + (x−x0 )+ (x−x0 )2 +· · ·+ (x−x0 )N ←- a finite sum, i.e. the sum stops .
0! 1! 2! N!
Formula (open form) is in open form. It can also be written in closed form, by using sigma notation, as
N
X f (n) (x0 )
pN (x) = (x − x0 )n . (closed form)
n=0
n!
So y = pN (x) is a polynomial of degree at most N and it has the form
N
X f (n) (x0 )
pN (x) = cn (x − x0 )n where the constants cn =
n=0
n!
are specially chosen so that derivatives match up at x0 , i.e. the constants cn ’s are chosen so that:
pN (x0 ) = f (x0 )
(1)
pN (x0 ) = f (1) (x0 )
(2)
pN (x0 ) = f (2) (x0 )
..
.
(N )
pN (x0 ) = f (N ) (x0 ) .
The constant cn is the nth Taylor coefficient of y = f (x) about x0 . The N th -order Maclaurin polynomial for y = f (x)
is just the N th -order Taylor polynomial for y = f (x) at x0 = 0 and so it is
N
X f (n) (0) n
pN (x) = x .
n=0
n!
1
Definition 2. The Taylor series for y = f (x) at x0 is the power series:
f 00 (x0 ) f (n) (x0 )
P∞ (x) = f (x0 ) + f 0 (x0 )(x − x0 ) + (x − x0 )2 + · · · + (x − x0 )n + . . . (open form)
2! n!
which can also be written as
f (0) (x0 ) f (1) (x0 ) f (2) (x0 ) f (n) (x0 )
P∞ (x) = + (x−x0 )+ (x−x0 )2 +· · ·+ (x−x0 )n +. . . ←- the sum keeps on going and going.
0! 1! 2! n!
The Taylor series can also be written in closed form, by using sigma notation, as
∞
X f (n) (x0 )
P∞ (x) = (x − x0 )n . (closed form)
n=0
n!
The Maclaurin series for y = f (x) is just the Taylor series for y = f (x) at x0 = 0.
1Here we are assuming that the derivatives y = f (n) (x) exist for each x in the interval I and for each n ∈ N ≡ {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, . . . } .
2
Big Questions 3. For what values of x does the power (a.k.a. Taylor) series
∞
X f (n) (x0 )
P∞ (x) = (x − x0 )n (1)
n=0
n!
converge (usually the Root or Ratio test helps us out with this question). If the power/Taylor series in formula (1)
does indeed converge at a point x, does the series converge to what we would want it to converge to, i.e., does
f (x) = P∞ (x) ? (2)
Question (2) is going to take some thought.
Definition 4. The N th -order Remainder term for y = f (x) at x0 is:
def
RN (x) = f (x) − PN (x)
where y = PN (x) is the N th -order Taylor polynomial for y = f (x) at x0 .
So
f (x) = PN (x) + RN (x) (3)
that is
f (x) ≈ PN (x) within an error of RN (x) .
We often think of all this as:
N
X f (n) (x0 )
f (x) ≈ (x − x0 )n ←- a finite sum, the sum stops at N .
n=0
n!
We would LIKE TO HAVE THAT
∞
??
X f (n) (x0 )
f (x) = (x − x0 )n ←- the sum keeps on going and going .
n=0
n!
In other notation:
??
f (x) ≈ PN (x) and the question is f (x) = P∞ (x)
where y = P∞ (x) is the Taylor series of y = f (x) at x0 .
??
Well, let’s think about what needs to be for f (x) = P∞ (x), i.e., for f to equal to its Taylor series.
Notice 5. Taking the limN →∞ of both sides in equation (3), we see that
∞
X f (n) (x0 )
f (x) = (x − x0 )n ←- the sum keeps on going and going .
n=0
n!
if and only if
lim RN (x) = 0 .
N →∞
Recall 6. limN →∞ RN (x) = 0 if and only if limN →∞ |RN (x)| = 0 .
So 7. If
lim |RN (x)| = 0 (4)
N →∞
then
∞
X f (n) (x0 )
f (x) = (x − x0 )n .
n=0
n!
So we basically want to show that (4) holds true.
2
How to do this? Well, this is where Mr. Taylor comes to the rescue!
2According to Mr. Taylor, his Remainder Theorem (see next page) was motivated by coffeehouse conversations about works of Newton
on planetary motion and works of Halley (of Halley’s comet) on roots of polynomials.
3
Taylor’s Remainder Theorem
3
Version 1: for a fixed point x ∈ I and a fixed N ∈ N.
There exists c between x and x0 so that
def f (N +1) (c)
theorem
RN (x) = f (x) − PN (x) = (x − x0 )(N +1) . (5)
(N + 1)!
So either x ≤ c ≤ x0 or x0 ≤ c ≤ x. So we do not know exactly what c is but atleast we know that c is between x and x0
and so c ∈ I.
Remark: This is a Big Theorem by Taylor. See the book for the proof. The proof uses the Mean Value Theorem.
Note that formula (5) implies that
(N +1)
f (c) (N +1)
|RN (x)| = |x − x0 | . (6)
(N + 1)!
i.e.,
max f (N +1) (c) ≤ M .
c∈I
Then
M N +1
|RN (x)| ≤ |x − x0 | (7)
(N + 1)!
for each x ∈ I.
Remark: This follows from formula (6).
3Here we assume that the (N + 1)-derivative of y = f (x), i.e. y = f (N +1) (x), exists for each x ∈ I.
4Here we assume that y = f (N ) (x), exists for each x ∈ I and each N ∈ N.