Financial Statements Ara 2020
Financial Statements Ara 2020
statements
Audit scope
The scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures performed were determined based on our risk assessment,
taking into account changes from the prior year, the financial significance of subsidiaries and other qualitative factors. We executed the
planned approach and concluded based on the results of our testing, ensuring that sufficient audit evidence had been obtained to
support our opinion.
Financial statements
Financial statements
Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set certain quantitative thresholds for materiality. These,
together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit
procedures on the individual financial statement line items and disclosures and in evaluating the effect of misstatements, both
individually and in aggregate on the financial statements as a whole.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows:
We use performance materiality to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected
misstatements exceeds overall materiality. Specifically, we use performance materiality in determining the scope of our audit and the
nature and extent of our testing of account balances, classes of transactions and disclosures, for example in determining sample sizes.
Our performance materiality was 75% of overall materiality, amounting to $675m (2019: $750m) for the group financial statements and
$641m (2019: $675m) for the company financial statements. In determining the performance materiality, we considered a number of
factors - the history of misstatements, our risk assessment and aggregation risk, and the effectiveness of controls.
For each component in the scope of our group audit, we allocated a materiality that is less than our overall group materiality. The range
of materiality allocated across components was between $60m and $855m. Certain components were audited to a local statutory audit
materiality that was less than the materiality we allocated them.
We agreed with the GAC that we would report to them misstatements identified during our group and company audit above $45m
(2019: $50m), as well as misstatements below those amounts that, in our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons.
the assumptions used in the impairment assessment over goodwill and actuaries on the estimates used in determining pension
liabilities. An increasing number of controls are operated on behalf of HSBC by third parties. We rely on audit evidence that is scoped
and provided by other auditors that are engaged by those third parties. For example, we obtain a report evidencing the testing of
external systems and controls supporting HSBC’s payroll and HR processes.
Conclusions relating to going concern
Our evaluation of the directors’ assessment of the group's and the company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of
accounting included:
• Performing a risk assessment to identify factors that could impact the going concern basis of accounting, including the impact of
Covid-19 and geopolitical risks.
• Understanding and evaluating the group’s financial forecasts and the group’s stress testing of liquidity and regulatory capital,
including the severity of the stress scenarios that were used.
• Reading and evaluating the adequacy of the disclosures made in the financial statements in relation to going concern.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that,
individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the group's and the company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a
period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the
preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.
However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this conclusion is not a guarantee as to the group's and the
company's ability to continue as a going concern.
In relation to the group's and the company’s reporting on how they have applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing
material to add or draw attention to in relation to the directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether the directors
considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this
report.
Reporting on other information
The other information comprises all of the information in the Annual Report other than the financial statements and our auditors’ report
thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other
information and, accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this report, any
form of assurance thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider
whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or
otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify an apparent material inconsistency or material misstatement, we are
required to perform procedures to conclude whether there is a material misstatement of the financial statements or a material
misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of
this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report based on these responsibilities.
With respect to the Strategic Report and Report of the Directors', we also considered whether the disclosures required by the UK
Companies Act 2006 have been included.
Based on our work undertaken in the course of the audit, the Companies Act 2006 requires us also to report certain opinions and
matters as described below.
Strategic Report and Report of the Directors
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit, the information given in the Strategic Report and Report of the
Directors' for the year ended 31 December 2020 is consistent with the financial statements and has been prepared in accordance with
applicable legal requirements.
In light of the knowledge and understanding of the group and company and their environment obtained in the course of the audit, we
did not identify any material misstatements in the Strategic Report and Report of the Directors.
Directors’ Remuneration
In our opinion, the part of the Directors' Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the
Companies Act 2006.
Corporate governance statement
The Listing Rules require us to review the directors’ statements in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the
corporate governance statement relating to the company’s compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code
specified for our review. Our additional responsibilities with respect to the corporate governance statement as other information are
described in the Reporting on other information section of this report.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate governance
statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit and we have nothing
material to add or draw attention to in relation to:
• The directors’ confirmation that they have carried out an assessment of the emerging and principal risks;
• The disclosures in the Annual Report and Accounts that describe those principal risks, what procedures are in place to identify
emerging risks and an explanation of how these are being managed or mitigated;
• The directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether they considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of
accounting in preparing them, and their identification of any material uncertainties to the group’s and company’s ability to continue
to do so over a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of the financial statements;
• The directors’ explanation as to their assessment of the group's and company’s prospects, the period this assessment covers and
why the period is appropriate; and
• The directors’ statement as to whether they have a reasonable expectation that the company will be able to continue in operation and
meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of its assessment, including any related disclosures drawing attention to any
necessary qualifications or assumptions.
Our review of the directors’ statement regarding the longer-term viability of the group was substantially less in scope than an audit and
only consisted of making inquiries and considering the directors’ process supporting their statement; checking that the statement is in
alignment with the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code; and considering whether the statement is consistent with
the financial statements and our knowledge and understanding of the group and company and their environment obtained in the course
of the audit.
In addition, based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate
governance statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit:
• The directors’ statement that they consider the Annual Report, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable, and provides
the information necessary for the members to assess the group’s and company's position, performance, business model and
strategy;
• The section of the Annual Report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems; and
• The section of the Annual Report describing the work of the GAC.
We have nothing to report in respect of our responsibility to report when the directors’ statement relating to the company’s compliance
with the Code does not properly disclose a departure from a relevant provision of the Code specified under the Listing Rules for review
by the auditors.
Appointment
Following the recommendation of the GAC, we were appointed by the members on 31 March 2015 to audit the financial statements for
the year ended 31 December 2015 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted engagement is six years, covering
the years ended 31 December 2015 to 31 December 2020.
Financial statements
Financial statements
Page
Consolidated income statement 278
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 279
Consolidated balance sheet 280
Consolidated statement of cash flows 281
Consolidated statement of changes in equity 282
HSBC Holdings income statement 284
HSBC Holdings statement of comprehensive income 284
HSBC Holdings balance sheet 285
HSBC Holdings statement of cash flows 286
HSBC Holdings statement of changes in equity 287
Financial statements
The accompanying notes on pages 288 to 370 and the audited sections in: ‘Risk’ on pages 106 to 194 (including ‘Measurement
uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of ECL estimates’ on pages 127 to 135), and ‘Directors’ remuneration report’ on pages 229 to 255
form an integral part of these financial statements.
These financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 23 February 2021 and signed on its behalf by:
– reverse repurchase agreements with banks of one month or less 65,086 65,370 74,702
– treasury bills, other bills and certificates of deposit less than three months 30,023 20,132 21,685
– cash collateral and net settlement accounts 17,194 12,376 14,075
– less: items in the course of transmission to other banks (4,343) (4,817) (5,641)
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 Dec3 468,323 293,742 312,911
Interest received was $45,578m (2019: $58,627m; 2018: $45,291m), interest paid was $17,740m (2019: $27,384m; 2018: $14,172m) and
dividends received (excluding dividends received from associates, which are presented separately above) were $1,158m (2019: $2,369m;
2018: $1,702m).
1 Adjustment to bring changes between opening and closing balance sheet amounts to average rates. This is not done on a line-by-line basis, as
details cannot be determined without unreasonable expense.
2 Subordinated liabilities changes during the year are attributable to repayments of $(3.5)bn (2019: $(4.2)bn; 2018: $(4.1)bn) of securities. Non-
cash changes during the year included foreign exchange gains/(losses) of $0.5bn (2019: $0.6bn; 2018: $(0.6)bn) and fair value gains/(losses) of
$1.1bn (2019: $1.4bn; 2018: $(1.4)bn).
3 At 31 December 2020, $41,912m (2019: $35,735m; 2018: $26,282m) was not available for use by HSBC, of which $16,935m (2019: $19,353m;
2018: $19,755m) related to mandatory deposits at central banks.
Called up
share Financial
capital Other assets Cash Total
and equity at flow Foreign Merger share- Non-
share instru- Retained FVOCI hedging exchange and other holders’ controlling Total
premium ments earnings3,4 reserve reserve reserve reserves4,5 equity interests equity
$m $m $m $m $m $m $m $m $m $m
At 1 Jan 2020 24,278 20,871 136,679 (108) (2) (25,133) 27,370 183,955 8,713 192,668
Profit for the year — — 5,229 — — — — 5,229 870 6,099
Other comprehensive income (net of tax) — — 1,118 1,913 459 4,758 — 8,248 161 8,409
– debt instruments at fair value through
other comprehensive income — — — 1,746 — — — 1,746 4 1,750
– equity instruments designated at fair value
through other comprehensive income — — — 167 — — — 167 45 212
– cash flow hedges — — — — 459 — — 459 12 471
– changes in fair value of financial liabilities
designated at fair value upon initial
recognition arising from changes in own
credit risk — — 167 — — — — 167 — 167
– remeasurement of defined benefit asset/
liability — — 831 — — — — 831 3 834
– share of other comprehensive income of
associates and joint ventures — — (73) — — — — (73) — (73)
– effects of hyperinflation — — 193 — — — — 193 — 193
– exchange differences — — — — — 4,758 — 4,758 97 4,855
Total comprehensive income for the
year — — 6,347 1,913 459 4,758 — 13,477 1,031 14,508
Shares issued under employee remuneration
and share plans 346 — (339) — — — — 7 — 7
Capital securities issued1 — 1,500 (3) — — — — 1,497 — 1,497
Dividends to shareholders — — (1,331) — — — — (1,331) (692) (2,023)
Redemption of securities2 — — (1,450) — — — — (1,450) — (1,450)
Transfers6 — — 435 — — — (435) — — —
Cost of share-based payment arrangements — — 434 — — — — 434 — 434
Other movements — 43 (200) 11 — — — (146) (500) (646)
At 31 Dec 2020 24,624 22,414 140,572 1,816 457 (20,375) 26,935 196,443 8,552 204,995
At 1 Jan 2019 23,789 22,367 138,191 (1,532) (206) (26,133) 29,777 186,253 7,996 194,249
Profit for the year — — 7,383 — — — — 7,383 1,325 8,708
Other comprehensive income (net of tax) — — (1,759) 1,424 204 1,000 — 869 148 1,017
– debt instruments at fair value through
other comprehensive income — — — 1,146 — — — 1,146 6 1,152
– equity instruments designated at fair value
through other comprehensive income — — — 278 — — — 278 88 366
– cash flow hedges — — — — 204 — — 204 2 206
– changes in fair value of financial liabilities
designated at fair value upon initial
recognition arising from changes in own
credit risk — — (2,002) — — — — (2,002) — (2,002)
– remeasurement of defined benefit asset/
liability — — 5 — — — — 5 8 13
– share of other comprehensive income of
associates and joint ventures — — 21 — — — — 21 — 21
– effects of hyperinflation — — 217 — — — — 217 — 217
– exchange differences — — — — — 1,000 — 1,000 44 1,044
Total comprehensive income for the year — — 5,624 1,424 204 1,000 — 8,252 1,473 9,725
Shares issued under employee remuneration
and share plans 557 — (495) — — — — 62 — 62
Shares issued in lieu of dividends and
amounts arising thereon — — 2,687 — — — — 2,687 — 2,687
Dividends to shareholders — — (11,683) — — — — (11,683) (777) (12,460)
Redemption of securities2 — (1,496) (12) — — — — (1,508) — (1,508)
Transfers6 — — 2,475 — — — (2,475) — — —
Cost of share-based payment arrangements — — 478 — — — — 478 — 478
Cancellation of shares7 (68) — (1,000) — — — 68 (1,000) — (1,000)
Other movements — — 414 — — — — 414 21 435
At 31 Dec 2019 24,278 20,871 136,679 (108) (2) (25,133) 27,370 183,955 8,713 192,668
1 During 2020 HSBC Holdings issued $1,500m of perpetual subordinated contingent convertible securities. In 2018, HSBC Holdings issued
$4,150m, £1,000m and SGD750m of perpetual subordinated contingent convertible capital securities on which there were $60m of external
issuance costs, $49m of intra-Group issuance costs and $11m of tax benefits. Under IFRSs these issuance costs and tax benefits are classified as
equity.
2 During 2020, HSBC Holdings called $1,450m 6.20% non-cumulative US dollar preference shares. For further details, see Note 31 in the Annual
Report and Accounts 2020. In 2019, HSBC Holdings redeemed $1,500m 5.625% perpetual subordinated capital securities on which there were
$12m of external issuance costs. In 2018, HSBC Holdings redeemed $2,200m 8.125% perpetual subordinated capital securities and its $3,800m
8.000% perpetual subordinated capital securities, Series 2, on which there were $172m of external issuance costs and $23m of intra-Group
issuance costs wound down. Under IFRSs external issuance costs are classified as equity.
3 At 31 December 2020, retained earnings included 509,825,249 treasury shares (2019: 432,108,782; 2018: 379,926,645). In addition, treasury
shares are also held within HSBC’s Insurance business retirement funds for the benefit of policyholders or beneficiaries within employee trusts for
the settlement of shares expected to be delivered under employee share schemes or bonus plans, and the market-making activities in Global
Markets.
4 Cumulative goodwill amounting to $5,138m has been charged against reserves in respect of acquisitions of subsidiaries prior to 1 January 1998,
including $3,469m charged against the merger reserve arising on the acquisition of HSBC Bank plc. The balance of $1,669m has been charged
Financial statements
The accompanying notes on pages 288 to 370 and the audited sections in: ‘Risk’ on pages 106 to 194 (including ‘Measurement
uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of ECL estimates’ on pages 127 to 135), and ‘Directors’ remuneration report’ on pages 229 to 255
form an integral part of these financial statements.
These financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 23 February 2021 and signed on its behalf by:
Interest received was $1,952m (2019: $2,216m; 2018: $2,116m), interest paid was $3,166m (2019: $3,819m; 2018: $3,379m) and
dividends received were $8,156m (2019: $15,117m; 2018: $10,411m).
1 The 2018 year included $44,893m (2020 and 2019: nil) return on capital from HSBC Finance (Netherlands) resulting from restructuring the
Group’s Asia operation to meet resolution and recovery requirements.
Dividends per ordinary share at 31 December 2020 were nil (2019: $0.51; 2018: $0.51).
1 At 31 December 2020, retained earnings included 326,766,253 ($2,521m) treasury shares (2019: 326,191,804 ($2,543m); 2018: 326,503,319
($2,546m)).
2 In August 2019, HSBC announced a share buy-back of up to $1.0bn, which was completed in September 2019.
3 The 2018 year included a re-presentation of the cancellation of shares to retained earnings and capital redemption reserve in respect of the 2018
share buy-back, under which retained earnings has been reduced by $3,000m, share premium increased by $2,836m and other reserves
increased by $164m.
4 At 31 December 2020, an impairment of $435m of HSBC Overseas Holdings (UK) Limited (2019: $2,475m) was recognised and a permitted
transfer of $435m (2019: $2,475m) was made from the merger reserve to retained earnings. In 2018, a part reversal of the impairment of HSBC
Overseas Holdings (UK) Limited resulted in a transfer from retained earnings back to the merger reserve of $2,200m.
5 Includes an adjustment to retained earnings for a repayment of capital by a subsidiary of $1,650m, which had been recognised as dividend
income in 2019.
HSBC follows the UK Finance Disclosure Code (‘the UKF Disclosure Code’). The UKF Disclosure Code aims to increase the quality and
comparability of UK banks’ disclosures and sets out five disclosure principles together with supporting guidance agreed in 2010. In line
with the principles of the UKF Disclosure Code, HSBC assesses good practice recommendations issued from time to time by relevant
regulators and standard setters, and will assess the applicability and relevance of such guidance, enhancing disclosures where
appropriate.
(f) Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The preparation of financial information requires the use of estimates and judgements about future conditions. In view of the inherent
uncertainties and the high level of subjectivity involved in the recognition or measurement of items, highlighted as the ‘critical
accounting estimates and judgements’ in section 1.2 below (including impairment of non-financial assets for the first time), it is possible
that the outcomes in the next financial year could differ from those on which management’s estimates are based. This could result in
materially different estimates and judgements from those reached by management for the purposes of these financial statements.
Management’s selection of HSBC’s accounting policies that contain critical estimates and judgements reflects the materiality of the
items to which the policies are applied and the high degree of judgement and estimation uncertainty involved.
(g) Segmental analysis
HSBC’s Chief Operating Decision Maker is the Group Chief Executive, who is supported by the rest of the Group Executive Committee
(‘GEC’), which operates as a general management committee under the direct authority of the Board. Operating segments are reported
in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the Group Chief Executive and the GEC.
Measurement of segmental assets, liabilities, income and expenses is in accordance with the Group’s accounting policies. Segmental
income and expenses include transfers between segments, and these transfers are conducted at arm’s length. Shared costs are included
in segments on the basis of the actual recharges made.
(h) Going concern
The financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis, as the Directors are satisfied that the Group and parent company have
the resources to continue in business for the foreseeable future. In making this assessment, the Directors have considered a wide range
of information relating to present and future conditions, including future projections of profitability, cash flows, capital requirements and
capital resources. These considerations include stressed scenarios that reflect the increasing uncertainty that the global Covid-19
outbreak has had on HSBC’s operations, as well as considering potential impacts from other top and emerging risks, and the related
impact on profitability, capital and liquidity.
1.2 Summary of significant accounting policies
(a) Consolidation and related policies
Investments in subsidiaries
Where an entity is governed by voting rights, HSBC consolidates when it holds – directly or indirectly – the necessary voting rights to
pass resolutions by the governing body. In all other cases, the assessment of control is more complex and requires judgement of other
factors, including having exposure to variability of returns, power to direct relevant activities, and whether power is held as agent or
principal.
Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method. The amount of non-controlling interest is measured either at fair
value or at the non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets. This election is made for each
business combination.
HSBC Holdings’ investments in subsidiaries are stated at cost less impairment losses.
Goodwill
Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units (‘CGUs’) for the purpose of impairment testing, which is undertaken at the lowest level at
which goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes. HSBC’s CGUs are based on geographical regions subdivided by global
business, except for Global Banking and Markets, for which goodwill is monitored on a global basis.
Impairment testing is performed at least once a year, or whenever there is an indication of impairment, by comparing the recoverable
amount of a CGU with its carrying amount.
Goodwill is included in a disposal group if the disposal group is a CGU to which goodwill has been allocated or it is an operation within
such a CGU. The amount of goodwill included in a disposal group is measured on the basis of the relative values of the operation
disposed of and the portion of the CGU retained.
Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The review of goodwill and non-financial assets (see Note 1.2(n)) for impairment reflects management’s best estimate of the future cash flows of the CGUs
and the rates used to discount these cash flows, both of which are subject to uncertain factors as follows:
Judgements Estimates
• The accuracy of forecast cash flows is subject to a • The future cash flows of the CGUs are sensitive to the cash flows projected for the periods for
high degree of uncertainty in volatile market which detailed forecasts are available and to assumptions regarding the long-term pattern of
conditions. Where such circumstances are sustainable cash flows thereafter. Forecasts are compared with actual performance and verifiable
determined to exist, management re-tests goodwill economic data, but they reflect management’s view of future business prospects at the time of
for impairment more frequently than once a year the assessment
when indicators of impairment exist. This ensures • The rates used to discount future expected cash flows can have a significant effect on their
that the assumptions on which the cash flow valuation, and are based on the costs of capital assigned to individual CGUs. The cost of capital
forecasts are based continue to reflect current percentage is generally derived from a capital asset pricing model, which incorporates inputs
market conditions and management’s best reflecting a number of financial and economic variables, including the risk-free interest rate in the
estimate of future business prospects country concerned and a premium for the risk of the business being evaluated. These variables
are subject to fluctuations in external market rates and economic conditions beyond
management’s control
• Key assumptions used in estimating goodwill and non-financial asset impairment are described in
Note 21
• ‘Net income/(expense) from assets and liabilities of insurance businesses, including related derivatives, measured at fair value
through profit or loss’: This includes interest income, interest expense and dividend income in respect of financial assets and liabilities
measured at fair value through profit or loss; and those derivatives managed in conjunction with the above that can be separately
identifiable from other trading derivatives.
• ‘Changes in fair value of designated debt instruments and related derivatives’: Interest paid on debt instruments and interest cash
flows on related derivatives is presented in interest expense where doing so reduces an accounting mismatch.
• ‘Changes in fair value of other financial instruments mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss’: This includes interest
on instruments that fail the solely payments of principal and interest test, see (d) below.
The accounting policies for insurance premium income are disclosed in Note 1.2(j).
(c) Valuation of financial instruments
All financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid
to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value of a financial
instrument on initial recognition is generally its transaction price (that is, the fair value of the consideration given or received). However,
if there is a difference between the transaction price and the fair value of financial instruments whose fair value is based on a quoted
price in an active market or a valuation technique that uses only data from observable markets, HSBC recognises the difference as a
trading gain or loss at inception (a ‘day 1 gain or loss’). In all other cases, the entire day 1 gain or loss is deferred and recognised in the
income statement over the life of the transaction until the transaction matures, is closed out, the valuation inputs become observable or
HSBC enters into an offsetting transaction. The fair value of financial instruments is generally measured on an individual basis. However,
in cases where HSBC manages a group of financial assets and liabilities according to its net market or credit risk exposure, the fair value
of the group of financial instruments is measured on a net basis but the underlying financial assets and liabilities are presented
separately in the financial statements, unless they satisfy the IFRS offsetting criteria.
Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The majority of valuation techniques employ only observable market data. However, certain financial instruments are classified on the basis of valuation
techniques that feature one or more significant market inputs that are unobservable, and for them, the measurement of fair value is more judgemental:
Judgements Estimates
• An instrument in its entirety is classified as valued using significant unobservable • Details on the Group’s level 3 financial instruments and the
inputs if, in the opinion of management, a significant proportion of the instrument’s sensitivity of their valuation to the effect of applying reasonable
inception profit or greater than 5% of the instrument’s valuation is driven by possible alternative assumptions in determining their fair value
unobservable inputs are set out in Note 12
• ‘Unobservable’ in this context means that there is little or no current market data
available from which to determine the price at which an arm’s length transaction
would be likely to occur. It generally does not mean that there is no data available
at all upon which to base a determination of fair value (consensus pricing data
may, for example, be used)
Non-qualifying hedges are derivatives entered into as economic hedges of assets and liabilities for which hedge accounting was not
applied.
(i) Impairment of amortised cost and FVOCI financial assets
Expected credit losses (‘ECL’) are recognised for loans and advances to banks and customers, non-trading reverse repurchase
agreements, other financial assets held at amortised cost, debt instruments measured at FVOCI, and certain loan commitments and
financial guarantee contracts. At initial recognition, allowance (or provision in the case of some loan commitments and financial
guarantees) is required for ECL resulting from default events that are possible within the next 12 months, or less, where the remaining
life is less than 12 months (’12-month ECL’). In the event of a significant increase in credit risk, allowance (or provision) is required for
ECL resulting from all possible default events over the expected life of the financial instrument (‘lifetime ECL’). Financial assets where
12-month ECL is recognised are considered to be ‘stage 1’; financial assets that are considered to have experienced a significant
increase in credit risk are in ‘stage 2’; and financial assets for which there is objective evidence of impairment so are considered to be in
default or otherwise credit impaired are in ‘stage 3’. Purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets (‘POCI’) are treated
differently, as set out below.
Credit impaired (stage 3)
HSBC determines that a financial instrument is credit impaired and in stage 3 by considering relevant objective evidence, primarily
whether:
• contractual payments of either principal or interest are past due for more than 90 days;
• there are other indications that the borrower is unlikely to pay, such as when a concession has been granted to the borrower for
economic or legal reasons relating to the borrower’s financial condition; and
• the loan is otherwise considered to be in default.
If such unlikeliness to pay is not identified at an earlier stage, it is deemed to occur when an exposure is 90 days past due, even where
regulatory rules permit default to be defined based on 180 days past due. Therefore, the definitions of credit impaired and default are
aligned as far as possible so that stage 3 represents all loans that are considered defaulted or otherwise credit impaired.
Interest income is recognised by applying the effective interest rate to the amortised cost amount, i.e. gross carrying amount less ECL
allowance.
Write-off
Financial assets (and the related impairment allowances) are normally written off, either partially or in full, when there is no realistic
prospect of recovery. Where loans are secured, this is generally after receipt of any proceeds from the realisation of security. In
circumstances where the net realisable value of any collateral has been determined and there is no reasonable expectation of further
recovery, write-off may be earlier.
Renegotiation
Loans are identified as renegotiated and classified as credit impaired when we modify the contractual payment terms due to significant
credit distress of the borrower. Renegotiated loans remain classified as credit impaired until there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate a
significant reduction in the risk of non-payment of future cash flows and retain the designation of renegotiated until maturity or
derecognition.
A loan that is renegotiated is derecognised if the existing agreement is cancelled and a new agreement is made on substantially different
terms, or if the terms of an existing agreement are modified such that the renegotiated loan is a substantially different financial
instrument. Any new loans that arise following derecognition events in these circumstances are considered to be POCI and will continue
to be disclosed as renegotiated loans.
Other than originated credit-impaired loans, all other modified loans could be transferred out of stage 3 if they no longer exhibit any
evidence of being credit impaired and, in the case of renegotiated loans, there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate a significant
reduction in the risk of non-payment of future cash flows over the minimum observation period, and there are no other indicators of
impairment. These loans could be transferred to stage 1 or 2 based on the mechanism as described below by comparing the risk of a
default occurring at the reporting date (based on the modified contractual terms) and the risk of a default occurring at initial recognition
(based on the original, unmodified contractual terms). Any amount written off as a result of the modification of contractual terms would
not be reversed.
Loan modifications other than renegotiated loans
Loan modifications that are not identified as renegotiated are considered to be commercial restructuring. Where a commercial
restructuring results in a modification (whether legalised through an amendment to the existing terms or the issuance of a new loan
contract) such that HSBC’s rights to the cash flows under the original contract have expired, the old loan is derecognised and the new
loan is recognised at fair value. The rights to cash flows are generally considered to have expired if the commercial restructure is at
market rates and no payment-related concession has been provided. Mandatory and general offer loan modifications that are not
borrower-specific, for example market-wide customer relief programmes, have not been classified as renegotiated loans and generally
have not resulted in derecognition, but their stage allocation is determined considering all available and supportable information under
our ECL impairment policy.
Significant increase in credit risk (stage 2)
An assessment of whether credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition is performed at each reporting period by
considering the change in the risk of default occurring over the remaining life of the financial instrument. The assessment explicitly or
implicitly compares the risk of default occurring at the reporting date compared with that at initial recognition, taking into account
reasonable and supportable information, including information about past events, current conditions and future economic conditions.
The assessment is unbiased, probability-weighted, and to the extent relevant, uses forward-looking information consistent with that
used in the measurement of ECL. The analysis of credit risk is multifactor. The determination of whether a specific factor is relevant and
its weight compared with other factors depends on the type of product, the characteristics of the financial instrument and the borrower,
and the geographical region. Therefore, it is not possible to provide a single set of criteria that will determine what is considered to be a
significant increase in credit risk, and these criteria will differ for different types of lending, particularly between retail and wholesale.
However, unless identified at an earlier stage, all financial assets are deemed to have suffered a significant increase in credit risk when
30 days past due. In addition, wholesale loans that are individually assessed, which are typically corporate and commercial customers,
and included on a watch or worry list, are included in stage 2.
For wholesale portfolios, the quantitative comparison assesses default risk using a lifetime probability of default (‘PD’), which
encompasses a wide range of information including the obligor’s customer risk rating (‘CRR’), macroeconomic condition forecasts and
credit transition probabilities. For origination CRRs up to 3.3, significant increase in credit risk is measured by comparing the average PD
for the remaining term estimated at origination with the equivalent estimation at the reporting date. The quantitative measure of
significance varies depending on the credit quality at origination as follows:
Origination CRR Significance trigger – PD to increase by
0.1–1.2 15bps
2.1–3.3 30bps
For CRRs greater than 3.3 that are not impaired, a significant increase in credit risk is considered to have occurred when the origination
PD has doubled. The significance of changes in PD was informed by expert credit risk judgement, referenced to historical credit
migrations and to relative changes in external market rates.
For loans originated prior to the implementation of IFRS 9, the origination PD does not include adjustments to reflect expectations of
future macroeconomic conditions since these are not available without the use of hindsight. In the absence of this data, origination PD
must be approximated assuming through-the-cycle (‘TTC’) PDs and TTC migration probabilities, consistent with the instrument’s
Further information about the 23-grade scale used for CRR can be found on page 121.
For certain portfolios of debt securities where external market ratings are available and credit ratings are not used in credit risk
management, the debt securities will be in stage 2 if their credit risk increases to the extent they are no longer considered investment
grade. Investment grade is where the financial instrument has a low risk of incurring losses, the structure has a strong capacity to meet
its contractual cash flow obligations in the near term, and adverse changes in economic and business conditions in the longer term may,
but will not necessarily, reduce the ability of the borrower to fulfil their contractual cash flow obligations.
For retail portfolios, default risk is assessed using a reporting date 12-month PD derived from credit scores, which incorporates all
available information about the customer. This PD is adjusted for the effect of macroeconomic forecasts for periods longer than
12 months and is considered to be a reasonable approximation of a lifetime PD measure. Retail exposures are first segmented into
homogeneous portfolios, generally by country, product and brand. Within each portfolio, the stage 2 accounts are defined as accounts
with an adjusted 12-month PD greater than the average 12-month PD of loans in that portfolio 12 months before they become 30 days
past due. The expert credit risk judgement is that no prior increase in credit risk is significant. This portfolio-specific threshold identifies
loans with a PD higher than would be expected from loans that are performing as originally expected, and higher than what would have
been acceptable at origination. It therefore approximates a comparison of origination to reporting date PDs.
Unimpaired and without significant increase in credit risk (stage 1)
ECL resulting from default events that are possible within the next 12 months (‘12-month ECL’) are recognised for financial instruments
that remain in stage 1.
Purchased or originated credit impaired
Financial assets that are purchased or originated at a deep discount that reflects the incurred credit losses are considered to be POCI.
This population includes the recognition of a new financial instrument following a renegotiation where concessions have been granted
for economic or contractual reasons relating to the borrower’s financial difficulty that otherwise would not have been considered. The
amount of change-in-lifetime ECL is recognised in profit or loss until the POCI is derecognised, even if the lifetime ECL are less than the
amount of ECL included in the estimated cash flows on initial recognition.
Movement between stages
Financial assets can be transferred between the different categories (other than POCI) depending on their relative increase in credit risk
since initial recognition. Financial instruments are transferred out of stage 2 if their credit risk is no longer considered to be significantly
increased since initial recognition based on the assessments described above. Except for renegotiated loans, financial instruments are
transferred out of stage 3 when they no longer exhibit any evidence of credit impairment as described above. Renegotiated loans that
are not POCI will continue to be in stage 3 until there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate a significant reduction in the risk of non-
payment of future cash flows, observed over a minimum one-year period and there are no other indicators of impairment. For loans that
are assessed for impairment on a portfolio basis, the evidence typically comprises a history of payment performance against the original
or revised terms, as appropriate to the circumstances. For loans that are assessed for impairment on an individual basis, all available
evidence is assessed on a case-by-case basis.
Measurement of ECL
The assessment of credit risk and the estimation of ECL are unbiased and probability-weighted, and incorporate all available information
that is relevant to the assessment including information about past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts
of future events and economic conditions at the reporting date. In addition, the estimation of ECL should take into account the time
value of money.
Financial statements
In general, HSBC calculates ECL using three main components: a probability of default, a loss given default (’LGD’) and the exposure at
default (‘EAD’).
The 12-month ECL is calculated by multiplying the 12-month PD, LGD and EAD. Lifetime ECL is calculated using the lifetime PD instead.
The 12-month and lifetime PDs represent the probability of default occurring over the next 12 months and the remaining maturity of the
instrument respectively.
The EAD represents the expected balance at default, taking into account the repayment of principal and interest from the balance sheet
date to the default event together with any expected drawdowns of committed facilities. The LGD represents expected losses on the
EAD given the event of default, taking into account, among other attributes, the mitigating effect of collateral value at the time it is
expected to be realised and the time value of money.
HSBC leverages the Basel II IRB framework where possible, with recalibration to meet the differing IFRS 9 requirements as set out in the
following table:
While 12-month PDs are recalibrated from Basel II models where possible, the lifetime PDs are determined by projecting the 12-month
PD using a term structure. For the wholesale methodology, the lifetime PD also takes into account credit migration, i.e. a customer
migrating through the CRR bands over its life.
The ECL for wholesale stage 3 is determined on an individual basis using a discounted cash flow (‘DCF’) methodology. The expected
future cash flows are based on the credit risk officer’s estimates as at the reporting date, reflecting reasonable and supportable
assumptions and projections of future recoveries and expected future receipts of interest. Collateral is taken into account if it is likely
that the recovery of the outstanding amount will include realisation of collateral based on the estimated fair value of collateral at the time
of expected realisation, less costs for obtaining and selling the collateral. The cash flows are discounted at a reasonable approximation
of the original effective interest rate. For significant cases, cash flows under four different scenarios are probability-weighted by
reference to the economic scenarios applied more generally by the Group and the judgement of the credit risk officer in relation to the
likelihood of the workout strategy succeeding or receivership being required. For less significant cases, the effect of different economic
scenarios and work-out strategies is approximated and applied as an adjustment to the most likely outcome.
Period over which ECL is measured
Expected credit loss is measured from the initial recognition of the financial asset. The maximum period considered when measuring
ECL (be it 12-month or lifetime ECL) is the maximum contractual period over which HSBC is exposed to credit risk. For wholesale
overdrafts, credit risk management actions are taken no less frequently than on an annual basis and therefore this period is to the
expected date of the next substantive credit review. The date of the substantive credit review also represents the initial recognition of the
new facility. However, where the financial instrument includes both a drawn and undrawn commitment and the contractual ability to
demand repayment and cancel the undrawn commitment does not serve to limit HSBC’s exposure to credit risk to the contractual notice
period, the contractual period does not determine the maximum period considered. Instead, ECL is measured over the period HSBC
remains exposed to credit risk that is not mitigated by credit risk management actions. This applies to retail overdrafts and credit cards,
where the period is the average time taken for stage 2 exposures to default or close as performing accounts, determined on a portfolio
basis and ranging from between two and six years. In addition, for these facilities it is not possible to identify the ECL on the loan
commitment component separately from the financial asset component. As a result, the total ECL is recognised in the loss allowance for
the financial asset unless the total ECL exceeds the gross carrying amount of the financial asset, in which case the ECL is recognised as
a provision.
Forward-looking economic inputs
HSBC applies multiple forward-looking global economic scenarios determined with reference to external forecast distributions
representative of our view of forecast economic conditions. This approach is considered sufficient to calculate unbiased expected loss in
most economic environments. In certain economic environments, additional analysis may be necessary and may result in additional
scenarios or adjustments, to reflect a range of possible economic outcomes sufficient for an unbiased estimate. The detailed
methodology is disclosed in ‘Measurement uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of ECL estimates’ on page 127.
Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The calculation of the Group’s ECL under IFRS 9 requires the Group to make a number of judgements, assumptions and estimates. The most significant are
set out below:
Judgements Estimates
• Defining what is considered to be a significant increase in credit risk • The sections marked as audited on pages 127 to
• Determining the lifetime and point of initial recognition of overdrafts and credit cards 141, ‘Measurement uncertainty and sensitivity
analysis of ECL estimates’ set out the
• Selecting and calibrating the PD, LGD and EAD models, which support the calculations,
assumptions used in determining ECL and
including making reasonable and supportable judgements about how models react to current
provide an indication of the sensitivity of the
and future economic conditions
result to the application of different weightings
• Selecting model inputs and economic forecasts, including determining whether sufficient and being applied to different economic assumptions
appropriately weighted economic forecasts are incorporated to calculate unbiased expected loss
• Making management adjustments to account for late breaking events, model and data
limitations and deficiencies, and expert credit judgements
Expenses are recognised when the employee starts to render service to which the award relates.
Cancellations result from the failure to meet a non-vesting condition during the vesting period, and are treated as an acceleration of
vesting recognised immediately in the income statement. Failure to meet a vesting condition by the employee is not treated as a
cancellation, and the amount of expense recognised for the award is adjusted to reflect the number of awards expected to vest.
Post-employment benefit plans
HSBC operates a number of pension schemes including defined benefit, defined contribution and post-employment benefit schemes.
Payments to defined contribution schemes are charged as an expense as the employees render service.
Defined benefit pension obligations are calculated using the projected unit credit method. The net charge to the income statement
mainly comprises the service cost and the net interest on the net defined benefit asset or liability, and is presented in operating
expenses. Remeasurements of the net defined benefit asset or liability, which comprise actuarial gains and losses, return on plan assets
excluding interest and the effect of the asset ceiling (if any, excluding interest), are recognised immediately in other comprehensive
income. The net defined benefit asset or liability represents the present value of defined benefit obligations reduced by the fair value of
plan assets (see policy (c)), after applying the asset ceiling test, where the net defined benefit surplus is limited to the present value of
available refunds and reductions in future contributions to the plan.
The cost of obligations arising from other post-employment plans are accounted for on the same basis as defined benefit pension plans.
(l) Tax
Income tax comprises current tax and deferred tax. Income tax is recognised in the income statement except to the extent that it relates
to items recognised in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, in which case the tax is recognised in the same statement as
the related item appears.
Current tax is the tax expected to be payable on the taxable profit for the year and on any adjustment to tax payable in respect of
previous years. HSBC provides for potential current tax liabilities that may arise on the basis of the amounts expected to be paid to the
tax authorities.
Deferred tax is recognised on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the balance sheet, and the
amounts attributed to such assets and liabilities for tax purposes. Deferred tax is calculated using the tax rates expected to apply in the
periods in which the assets will be realised or the liabilities settled.
Current and deferred tax are calculated based on tax rates and laws enacted, or substantively enacted, by the balance sheet date.
Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The recognition of deferred tax assets depends on judgements
Judgements Estimates
• Assessing the probability and sufficiency of future taxable profits, taking into
account the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences and tax
planning strategies including corporate reorganisations
20191 2018
Financial statements
1 A change in reportable segments was made in 2020. Comparative data have been re-presented accordingly. For further guidance, see Note 10:
Segmental Analysis on page 311.
Net fee income includes $5,858m of fees earned on financial assets that are not at fair value through profit or loss, other than amounts
included in determining the effective interest rate (2019: $6,647m; 2018: $7,522m), $1,260m of fees payable on financial liabilities that
are not at fair value through profit or loss, other than amounts included in determining the effective interest rate (2019: $1,450m; 2018:
$1,682m), $3,426m of fees earned on trust and other fiduciary activities (2019: $3,110m; 2018: $3,165m) and $267m of fees payable
relating to trust and other fiduciary activities (2019: $237m; 2018: $175m).
3 Net income from financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss
1 The debt instruments, issued for funding purposes, are designated under the fair value option to reduce an accounting mismatch.
HSBC Holdings
2020 2019 2018
$m $m $m
Net income/(expense) arising on:
– trading activities (336) (559) (176)
– other instruments managed on a fair value basis 1,137 2,036 421
Net income from financial instruments held for trading or managed on a fair value basis 801 1,477 245
Derivatives managed in conjunction with HSBC Holdings-issued debt securities 694 764 (337)
Other changes in fair value (1,020) (1,124) 260
Changes in fair value of designated debt and related derivatives (326) (360) (77)
Changes in fair value of other financial instruments mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss 1,141 1,659 43
Year ended 31 Dec 1,616 2,776 211
4 Insurance business
Gross claims and benefits paid and movement in liabilities 11,305 1,217 3,810 16,332
– claims, benefits and surrenders paid 3,783 900 1,921 6,604
– movement in liabilities 7,522 317 1,889 9,728
Reinsurers’ share of claims and benefits paid and movement in liabilities (1,402) (4) — (1,406)
– claims, benefits and surrenders paid (411) (17) — (428)
– movement in liabilities (991) 13 — (978)
Year ended 31 Dec 2019 9,903 1,213 3,810 14,926
Gross claims and benefits paid and movement in liabilities 8,943 (446) 1,724 10,221
– claims, benefits and surrenders paid 3,852 1,088 1,869 6,809
– movement in liabilities 5,091 (1,534) (145) 3,412
Reinsurers’ share of claims and benefits paid and movement in liabilities (605) 191 — (414)
– claims, benefits and surrenders paid (311) (181) — (492)
– movement in liabilities (294) 372 — 78
Year ended 31 Dec 2018 8,338 (255) 1,724 9,807
Gross liabilities under insurance contracts at 1 Jan 2019 57,283 5,789 24,258 87,330
Claims and benefits paid (3,804) (900) (1,900) (6,604)
Increase in liabilities to policyholders 11,326 1,217 3,789 16,332
Exchange differences and other movements 2 519 45 (183) 381
Gross liabilities under insurance contracts at 31 Dec 2019 65,324 6,151 25,964 97,439
Reinsurers’ share of liabilities under insurance contracts (3,521) (71) — (3,592)
Net liabilities under insurance contracts at 31 Dec 2019 61,803 6,080 25,964 93,847
comprehensive income.
The key factors contributing to the movement in liabilities to policyholders included movements in the market value of assets supporting
policyholder liabilities, death claims, surrenders, lapses, new business, the declaration of bonuses and other amounts attributable to
policyholders.
Average number of persons employed by HSBC during the year by global business
2020 20191 20181
Wealth and Personal Banking 144,615 148,680 144,109
Commercial Banking 45,631 46,584 48,983
Global Banking and Markets 49,055 51,313 49,217
Corporate Centre 411 478 541
Year ended 31 Dec 239,712 247,055 242,850
1 A change in reportable segments was made in 2020. Comparative data have been re-presented accordingly. For further guidance, see Note 10:
Segmental analysis on page 311.
Average number of persons employed by HSBC during the year by geographical region
2020 2019 2018
Europe 64,886 66,392 67,007
Asia 129,923 133,624 127,992
Middle East and North Africa 9,550 9,798 9,798
North America 15,430 16,615 17,350
Latin America 19,923 20,626 20,703
Year ended 31 Dec 239,712 247,055 242,850
Share-based payments
‘Wages and salaries’ includes the effect of share-based payments arrangements, of which $434m was equity settled (2019: $478m;
2018: $450m), as follows:
2020 2019 2018
$m $m $m
Conditional share awards 411 521 499
Savings-related and other share award option plans 51 30 23
Year ended 31 Dec 462 551 522
The principal plan has a defined benefit section and a defined contribution section. The defined benefit section was closed to future
benefit accrual in 2015, with defined benefits earned by employees at that date continuing to be linked to their salary while they remain
employed by HSBC. The plan is overseen by an independent corporate trustee, who has a fiduciary responsibility for the operation of the
plan. Its assets are held separately from the assets of the Group.
The investment strategy of the plan is to hold the majority of assets in bonds, with the remainder in a diverse range of investments. It
also includes some interest rate swaps to reduce interest rate risk and inflation swaps to reduce inflation risk.
The latest funding valuation of the plan at 31 December 2019 was carried out by Colin G Singer of Willis Towers Watson Limited, who is
a Fellow of the UK Institute and Faculty of Actuaries, using the projected unit credit method. At that date, the market value of the plan’s
assets was £31.1bn ($41.1bn) and this exceeded the value placed on its liabilities on an ongoing basis by £2.5bn ($3.3bn), giving a
funding level of 109%. These figures include defined contribution assets amounting to £2.4bn ($3.2bn). The main differences between
the assumptions used for assessing the defined benefit liabilities for this funding valuation and those used for IAS 19 are more prudent
assumptions for discount rate, inflation rate and life expectancy. The next funding valuation will have an effective date of 31 December
2022.
Although the plan was in surplus at the valuation date, HSBC continues to make further contributions to the plan to support a lower-risk
investment strategy over the longer term. The remaining contribution is £160m ($218m) to be paid in 2021. The main employer of the
principal plan is HSBC UK Bank plc, with additional support from HSBC Holdings plc. The HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme is fully
sectionalised and no entities outside the ring fence participate in the HBUK section. The sectionalisation, which took place in 2018, did
not materially affect the overall funding position of the plan.
The actuary also assessed the value of the liabilities if the plan were to have been stopped and an insurance company asked to secure all
future pension payments. This is generally larger than the amount needed on the ongoing basis described above because an insurance
company would use more prudent assumptions and include an explicit allowance for the future administrative expenses of the plan.
Under this approach, the amount of assets needed was estimated to be £33bn ($44bn) at 31 December 2019.
Guaranteed minimum pension equalisation
Following a judgment issued by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales in 2018, we estimated the financial effect of equalising
benefits in respect of guaranteed minimum pension (‘GMP’) equalisation, and any potential conversion of GMPs into non-GMP benefits,
to be an approximate 0.9% increase in the principal plan’s liabilities, or £187m ($239m). This was recognised in the income statement in
2018. A further judgment by the High Court on 20 November 2020 ruled that GMPs should also be equalised for those who had
previously transferred benefits from the principal plan to another arrangement, with £13m ($17m) consequently being recognised in
2020. We continue to assess the impact of GMP equalisation.
Net assets/(liabilities) recognised on the balance sheet in respect of defined benefit plans
Present value
of defined Effect of
Fair value of benefit limit on plan
plan assets obligations surpluses Total
$m $m $m $m
Defined benefit pension plans 52,990 (43,995) (44) 8,951
Defined benefit healthcare plans 114 (639) — (525)
At 31 Dec 2020 53,104 (44,634) (44) 8,426
Total employee benefit liabilities (within Note 26 ‘Accruals, deferred income and other
liabilities’) (2,025)
Total employee benefit assets (within Note 22 ‘Prepayments, accrued income and
other assets’) 10,450
HSBC Holdings
Employee compensation and benefit expense in respect of HSBC Holdings’ employees in 2020 amounted to $56m (2019: $37m). The
average number of persons employed during 2020 was 59 (2019: 60). Employees who are members of defined benefit pension plans are
principally members of either the HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme or the HSBC International Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme. HSBC
Holdings pays contributions to such plans for its own employees in accordance with the schedules of contributions determined by the
trustees of the plans and recognises these contributions as an expense as they fall due.
HSBC expects to make $376m of contributions to defined benefit pension plans during 2021. Benefits expected to be paid from the
plans to retirees over each of the next five years, and in aggregate for the five years thereafter, are as follows:
1 The duration of the defined benefit obligation is 17.4 years for the principal plan under the disclosure assumptions adopted (2019: 18.1 years) and
13.5 years for all other plans combined (2019: 13.2 years).
2 For further details of the principal plan, see page 303.
1 The fair value of plan assets includes derivatives entered into with HSBC Bank plc as detailed in Note 35. These derivatives are presented within
the principal plan at 31 December 2020. Comparatives have been re-presented.
2 For further details on the principal plan, see page 303.
Mortality tables and average life expectancy at age 601 for the principal plan
Mortality Life expectancy at age 60 for Life expectancy at age 60 for
table a male member currently: a female member currently:
Aged 60 Aged 40 Aged 60 Aged 40
UK
At 31 Dec 2020 SAPS S32 27.0 28.5 28.1 29.7
At 31 Dec 2019 SAPS S23 28.0 29.4 28.2 29.8
The above sensitivity analyses are based on a change in an assumption while holding all other assumptions constant. In practice, this in
unlikely to occur, and changes in some of the assumptions may be correlated. When calculating the sensitivity of the defined benefit
obligation to significant actuarial assumptions the same method (present value of the defined benefit obligation calculated with the
projected unit credit method at the end of the reporting period) has been applied as when calculating the defined benefit asset
recognised in the balance sheet. The methods and types of assumptions used in preparing the sensitivity analysis did not change
compared with the prior period.
6 Auditor’s remuneration
1 Fees payable to PwC for the statutory audit of the consolidated financial statements of HSBC and the separate financial statements of HSBC
Holdings. They include amounts payable for services relating to the consolidation returns of HSBC Holdings’ subsidiaries, which are clearly
identifiable as being in support of the Group audit opinion.
2 Including services for assurance and other services that relate to statutory and regulatory filings, including interim reviews.
3 Including permitted services relating to attestation reports on internal controls of a service organisation primarily prepared for and used by third
party end user, including comfort letters.
4 Includes reviews of PRA regulatory reporting returns in 2020.
No fees were payable by HSBC to PwC as principal auditor for the following types of services: internal audit services and services related
to litigation, recruitment and remuneration.
No fees were payable by HSBC’s associated pension schemes to PwC as principal auditor for the following types of services: internal
audit services, other assurance services, services related to corporate finance transactions, valuation and actuarial services, litigation,
recruitment and remuneration, and information technology.
In addition to the above, the estimated fees paid to PwC by third parties associated with HSBC amounted to $12.3m (2019: $17.2m;
2018: $14.0m). In these cases, HSBC was connected with the contracting party and may therefore have been involved in appointing
PwC. These fees arose from services such as auditing mutual funds managed by HSBC and reviewing the financial position of corporate
concerns that borrow from HSBC.
Fees payable for non-audit services for HSBC Holdings are not disclosed separately because such fees are disclosed on a consolidated
basis for the Group.
Financial statements
7 Tax
Tax expense
2020 2019 2018
Footnotes $m $m $m
Current tax 1 2,700 3,768 4,195
– for this year 2,883 3,689 4,158
– adjustments in respect of prior years (183) 79 37
Deferred tax (22) 871 670
– origination and reversal of temporary differences (341) 684 656
– effect of changes in tax rates 58 (11) 17
– adjustments in respect of prior years 261 198 (3)
Year ended 31 Dec 2 2,678 4,639 4,865
1 Current tax included Hong Kong profits tax of $888m (2019: $1,413m; 2018: $1,532m). The Hong Kong tax rate applying to the profits of
subsidiaries assessable in Hong Kong was 16.5% (2019: 16.5%; 2018: 16.5%).
2 In addition to amounts recorded in the income statement, a tax charge of $7m (2019: charge of $6m) was recorded directly to equity.
Tax reconciliation
The tax charged to the income statement differs from the tax charge that would apply if all profits had been taxed at the UK corporation
tax rate as follows:
The Group’s profits are taxed at different rates depending on the country or territory in which the profits arise. The key applicable tax
rates for 2020 include Hong Kong (16.5%), the US (21%) and the UK (19%). If the Group’s profits were taxed at the statutory rates of the
countries in which the profits arose, then the tax rate for the year would have been 21.00% (2019: 20.90%). The effective tax rate for the
year of 30.5% (2019: 34.8%) was lower than for 2019. The effective tax rate for 2019 included a non-deductible impairment of goodwill
of $7.3bn (10.7% increase in effective tax rate) and a higher level of non-deductible customer compensation (3.1% increase in effective
tax rate compared with 2020), both of which are non-recurring items. This was partly offset by the impact of non-recognition of deferred
tax, mainly in the UK ($0.4bn) and France ($0.4bn), being greater in 2020 than 2019 (9.2% increase in effective tax rate compared with
2019).
Following an amendment to IAS 12 effective 1 January 2019, the income tax consequences of distributions, including AT1 coupon
payments, were recorded in the income statement tax expense. The 2018 reconciliation has not been restated.
Accounting for taxes involves some estimation because the tax law is uncertain and its application requires a degree of judgement,
which authorities may dispute. Liabilities are recognised based on best estimates of the probable outcome, taking into account external
advice where appropriate. We do not expect significant liabilities to arise in excess of the amounts provided. HSBC only recognises
current and deferred tax assets where recovery is probable.
8 Dividends
Dividends to shareholders of the parent company
2020 2019 2018
Per Settled Per Settled Per Settled
share Total in scrip share Total in scrip share Total in scrip
$ $m $m $ $m $m $ $m $m
Dividends paid on ordinary shares
In respect of previous year:
– fourth interim dividend — — — 0.21 4,206 1,160 0.21 4,197 393
In respect of current year:
– first interim dividend — — — 0.10 2,013 375 0.10 2,008 213
– second interim dividend — — — 0.10 2,021 795 0.10 1,990 181
– third interim dividend — — — 0.10 2,029 357 0.10 1,992 707
Total — — — 0.51 10,269 2,687 0.51 10,187 1,494
Total dividends on preference shares classified as
equity (paid quarterly) 62.00 90 62.00 90 62.00 90
Total coupons on capital securities classified as
equity 1,241 1,324 1,270
Dividends to shareholders 1,331 11,683 11,547
Financial statements
1 Discretionary coupons are paid quarterly on the perpetual subordinated capital securities, in denominations of $25 per security.
2 Discretionary coupons are paid semi-annually on the perpetual subordinated contingent convertible securities, in denominations of each
security’s issuance currency 1,000 per security.
3 For further details of these securities, see Note 31.
4 This security was called by HSBC Holdings on 22 November 2019 and was redeemed and cancelled on 17 January 2020. Between the date of
exercise of the call option and the redemption, this security was considered to be a subordinated liability. For further details on additional tier 1
securities, see Note 31.
5 This security was issued by HSBC Holdings on 17 December 2020. The first call date commences six calendar months prior to the reset date of
17 June 2031.
After the end of the year, the Directors approved an interim dividend in respect of the financial year ended 31 December 2020 of $0.15
per ordinary share, a distribution of approximately $3,055m. The interim dividend will be payable on 29 April 2021 to holders on the
Principal Register in the UK, the Hong Kong Overseas Branch Register or the Bermuda Overseas Branch Register on 12 March 2021. No
liability was recorded in the financial statements in respect of the interim dividend for 2020.
On 4 January 2021, HSBC paid a coupon on its €1,250m subordinated capital securities, representing a total distribution of €30m
($36m). No liability was recorded in the balance sheet at 31 December 2020 in respect of this coupon payment.
Basic earnings per ordinary share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to ordinary shareholders of the parent company by the
weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding, excluding own shares held. Diluted earnings per ordinary share is calculated
by dividing the basic earnings, which require no adjustment for the effects of dilutive potential ordinary shares, by the weighted average
number of ordinary shares outstanding, excluding own shares held, plus the weighted average number of ordinary shares that would be
issued on conversion of dilutive potential ordinary shares.
1 Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding (basic) or assuming dilution (diluted).
The number of anti-dilutive employee share options excluded from the weighted average number of dilutive potential ordinary shares is
14.6 million (2019: 1.1 million; 2018: nil).
The Group Chief Executive, supported by the rest of the Group Executive Committee (‘GEC’), is considered the Chief Operating Decision
Maker (‘CODM’) for the purposes of identifying the Group’s reportable segments. Global business results are assessed by the CODM on
the basis of adjusted performance that removes the effects of significant items and currency translation from reported results. Therefore,
we present these results on an adjusted basis as required by IFRSs. The 2019 and 2018 adjusted performance information is presented
on a constant currency basis. The 2019 and 2018 income statements are converted at the average rates of exchange for 2020, and the
balance sheets at 31 December 2019 and 31 December 2018 at the prevailing rates of exchange on 31 December 2020.
Our operations are closely integrated and, accordingly, the presentation of data includes internal allocations of certain items of income
and expense. These allocations include the costs of certain support services and global functions to the extent that they can be
meaningfully attributed to global businesses. While such allocations have been made on a systematic and consistent basis, they
necessarily involve a degree of subjectivity. Costs that are not allocated to global businesses are included in Corporate Centre.
Where relevant, income and expense amounts presented include the results of inter-segment funding along with inter-company and
inter-business line transactions. All such transactions are undertaken on arm’s length terms. The intra-Group elimination items for the
global businesses are presented in Corporate Centre.
Change in reportable segments
Effective from the second quarter of 2020, we made the following realignments within our internal reporting to the GEC and CODM:
• We simplified our matrix organisational structure by combining Global Private Banking and Retail Banking and Wealth Management
to form Wealth and Personal Banking.
• We reallocated our reporting of Markets Treasury, hyperinflation accounting in Argentina and HSBC Holdings net interest expense
from Corporate Centre to the global businesses.
Comparative data have been re-presented accordingly.
Our global businesses
We provide a comprehensive range of banking and related financial services to our customers in our three global businesses. The
products and services offered to customers are organised by these global businesses.
• Wealth and Personal Banking (‘WPB’) provides a full range of retail banking and wealth products to our customers from personal
banking to ultra high net worth individuals. Typically, customer offerings include retail banking products, such as current and savings
accounts, mortgages and personal loans, credit cards, debit cards and local and international payment services. We also provide
wealth management services, including insurance and investment products, global asset management services, investment
management and Private Wealth Solutions for customers with more sophisticated and international requirements.
• Commercial Banking (‘CMB’) offers a broad range of products and services to serve the needs of our commercial customers,
including small and medium-sized enterprises, mid-market enterprises and corporates. These include credit and lending, international
trade and receivables finance, treasury management and liquidity solutions (payments and cash management and commercial cards),
commercial insurance and investments. CMB also offers customers access to products and services offered by other global
businesses, such as Global Banking and Markets, which include foreign exchange products, raising capital on debt and equity
markets and advisory services.
• Global Banking and Markets (‘GBM’) provides tailored financial solutions to major government, corporate and institutional clients and
private investors worldwide. The client-focused business lines deliver a full range of banking capabilities including financing, advisory
and transaction services, a markets business that provides services in credit, rates, foreign exchange, equities, money markets and
securities services, and principal investment activities.
HSBC adjusted profit before tax and balance sheet data (continued)
20192
Wealth and Global
Personal Commercial Banking and Corporate
Banking Banking Markets Centre Total
Footnotes $m $m $m $m $m
Net operating income/(expense) before change in expected credit losses
and other credit impairment charges 1 25,565 15,164 14,869 (654) 54,944
– external 21,252 16,094 20,314 (2,716) 54,944
– inter-segment 4,313 (930) (5,445) 2,062 —
of which: net interest income/(expense) 17,423 10,957 5,223 (3,264) 30,339
Change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment (charges)/
recoveries (1,348) (1,162) (153) 36 (2,627)
Net operating income/(expense) 24,217 14,002 14,716 (618) 52,317
Total operating expenses (15,388) (6,832) (9,544) (755) (32,519)
Operating profit/(loss) 8,829 7,170 5,172 (1,373) 19,798
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures 54 — — 2,297 2,351
Adjusted profit before tax 8,883 7,170 5,172 924 22,149
% % % % %
Share of HSBC’s adjusted profit before tax 40.1 32.4 23.4 4.2 100.0
Adjusted cost efficiency ratio 60.2 45.1 64.2 (115.4) 59.2
Adjusted balance sheet data $m $m $m $m $m
Loans and advances to customers (net) 455,618 353,781 252,131 1,166 1,062,696
Interests in associates and joint ventures 449 14 16 24,941 25,420
Total external assets 793,100 523,585 1,310,772 156,354 2,783,811
Customer accounts 768,151 397,182 304,094 780 1,470,207
1 Net operating income before change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges, also referred to as revenue.
2 A change in reportable segments was made in 2020. Comparative data have been re-presented accordingly.
HSBC adjusted profit before tax and balance sheet data (continued)
20182
Wealth and Global
Personal Commercial Banking and Corporate
Banking Banking Markets Centre Total
Footnotes $m $m $m $m $m
Net operating income/(expense) before change in expected credit losses
and other credit impairment charges 1 23,551 14,374 15,056 (883) 52,098
– external 19,096 14,675 18,780 (453) 52,098
– inter-segment 4,455 (301) (3,724) (430) —
of which: net interest income/(expense) 16,418 10,220 4,880 (2,070) 29,448
Change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment (charges)/
recoveries (1,072) (683) 34 101 (1,620)
Net operating income/(expense) 22,479 13,691 15,090 (782) 50,478
Total operating expenses (14,614) (6,307) (9,316) (1,486) (31,723)
Operating profit/(loss) 7,865 7,384 5,774 (2,268) 18,755
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures 32 — — 2,412 2,444
Adjusted profit before tax 7,897 7,384 5,774 144 21,199
% % % % %
Share of HSBC’s adjusted profit before tax 37.3 34.8 27.2 0.7 100.0
Adjusted cost efficiency ratio 62.1 43.9 61.9 (168.3) 60.9
Adjusted balance sheet data $m $m $m $m $m
Loans and advances to customers (net) 419,231 344,855 253,319 1,599 1,019,004
Interests in associates and joint ventures 399 — — 22,753 23,152
Total external assets 741,222 520,403 1,261,807 128,021 2,651,453
Customer accounts 729,902 372,551 306,438 831 1,409,722
1 Net operating income before change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges, also referred to as revenue.
2 A change in reportable segments was made in 2020. Comparative data have been re-presented accordingly.
Reported external net operating income is attributed to countries and territories on the basis of the location of the branch responsible for
reporting the results or advancing the funds:
2020 2019 2018
Footnotes $m $m $m
Reported external net operating income by country/territory 1 50,429 56,098 53,780
– UK 9,163 9,011 10,340
– Hong Kong 15,783 18,449 17,162
– US 4,474 4,471 4,379
– France 1,753 1,942 1,898
– other countries 19,256 22,225 20,001
1 Net operating income before change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges, also referred to as revenue.
1 Net operating income before change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges, also referred to as revenue.
1 Includes fair value movements on non-qualifying hedges and debt valuation adjustments on derivatives.
2 Comprises losses associated with the RWA reduction commitments and gains relating to the business update in February 2020.
3 Comprises costs associated with preparations for the UK’s exit from the European Union, costs to establish the UK ring-fenced bank (including
the UK ServCo group) and costs associated with establishing an intermediate holding company in Hong Kong.
4 Includes impairment of software intangible assets of $189m (of the total software intangible asset impairment of $1,347m) and impairment of
tangible assets of $197m.
5 During the year, The Saudi British Bank ('SABB'), an associate of HSBC, impaired the goodwill that arose following the merger with Alawwal
Financial statements
bank in 2019. HSBC's post-tax share of the goodwill impairment was $462m.
11 Trading assets
2020 2019
Footnotes $m $m
Treasury and other eligible bills 24,035 21,789
Debt securities 102,846 126,043
Equity securities 77,643 78,827
Trading securities 204,524 226,659
Loans and advances to banks 1 8,242 8,402
Loans and advances to customers 1 19,224 19,210
Year ended 31 Dec 231,990 254,271
1 Loans and advances to banks and customers include reverse repos, stock borrowing and other accounts.
Trading securities1
2020 2019
Footnotes $m $m
US Treasury and US Government agencies 2 17,393 25,722
UK Government 8,046 10,040
Hong Kong Government 6,500 9,783
Other governments 70,580 72,456
Asset-backed securities 3 4,253 4,691
Corporate debt and other securities 20,109 25,140
Equity securities 77,643 78,827
At 31 Dec 204,524 226,659
1 Included within these figures are debt securities issued by banks and other financial institutions of $10,876m (2019: $17,846m), of which
$1,298m (2019: $2,637m) are guaranteed by various governments.
2 Includes securities that are supported by an explicit guarantee issued by the US Government.
3 Excludes asset-backed securities included under US Treasury and US Government agencies.
Control framework
Fair values are subject to a control framework designed to ensure that they are either determined or validated by a function independent
of the risk taker.
Where fair values are determined by reference to externally quoted prices or observable pricing inputs to models, independent price
determination or validation is used. For inactive markets, HSBC sources alternative market information, with greater weight given to
information that is considered to be more relevant and reliable. Examples of the factors considered are price observability, instrument
comparability, consistency of data sources, underlying data accuracy and timing of prices.
For fair values determined using valuation models, the control framework includes development or validation by independent support
functions of the model logic, inputs, model outputs and adjustments. Valuation models are subject to a process of due diligence before
becoming operational and are calibrated against external market data on an ongoing basis.
Changes in fair value are generally subject to a profit and loss analysis process and are disaggregated into high-level categories
including portfolio changes, market movements and other fair value adjustments.
The majority of financial instruments measured at fair value are in GBM. GBM’s fair value governance structure comprises its Finance
function, Valuation Committees and a Valuation Committee Review Group. Finance is responsible for establishing procedures governing
valuation and ensuring fair values are in compliance with accounting standards. The fair values are reviewed by the Valuation
Committees, which consist of independent support functions. These committees are overseen by the Valuation Committee Review
Group, which considers all material subjective valuations.
Financial liabilities measured at fair value
In certain circumstances, HSBC records its own debt in issue at fair value, based on quoted prices in an active market for the specific
instrument. When quoted market prices are unavailable, the own debt in issue is valued using valuation techniques, the inputs for which
are either based on quoted prices in an inactive market for the instrument or are estimated by comparison with quoted prices in an
active market for similar instruments. In both cases, the fair value includes the effect of applying the credit spread that is appropriate to
HSBC’s liabilities. The change in fair value of issued debt securities attributable to the Group’s own credit spread is computed as follows:
for each security at each reporting date, an externally verifiable price is obtained or a price is derived using credit spreads for similar
securities for the same issuer. Then, using discounted cash flow, each security is valued using a Libor-based discount curve. The
difference in the valuations is attributable to the Group’s own credit spread. This methodology is applied consistently across all
securities.
Structured notes issued and certain other hybrid instruments are included within trading liabilities and are measured at fair value.
The credit spread applied to these instruments is derived from the spreads at which HSBC issues structured notes.
Gains and losses arising from changes in the credit spread of liabilities issued by HSBC, recorded in other comprehensive income,
reverse over the contractual life of the debt, provided that the debt is not repaid at a premium or a discount.
Fair value hierarchy
Fair values of financial assets and liabilities are determined according to the following hierarchy:
• Level 1 – valuation technique using quoted market price. These are financial instruments with quoted prices for identical instruments
in active markets that HSBC can access at the measurement date.
• Level 2 – valuation technique using observable inputs. These are financial instruments with quoted prices for similar instruments in
active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in inactive markets and financial instruments valued using models
where all significant inputs are observable.
• Level 3 – valuation technique with significant unobservable inputs. These are financial instruments valued using valuation techniques
where one or more significant inputs are unobservable.
Balances from 2019 have been re-presented to disclose a consistent application of the levelling methodology, primarily for private debt
and equity and real estate investments during the period. This resulted in $15.1bn and $2.9bn moving into Levels 2 and 3, respectively,
from Level 1. The change has impacted the disclosure for ‘Financial investments’ and ‘Financial assets designated and otherwise
mandatorily measured at fair value’.
Balances from 2019 have been re-presented to disclose a consistent application of the levelling methodology.
Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are deemed to occur at the end of each quarterly reporting period. Transfers into and
out of levels of the fair value hierarchy are primarily attributable to observability of valuation inputs and price transparency.
Fair value adjustments
We adopt the use of fair value adjustments when we take into consideration additional factors not incorporated within the valuation
model that would otherwise be considered by a market participant. We classify fair value adjustments as either ‘risk-related’ or ‘model-
related’. The majority of these adjustments relate to GBM. Movements in the level of fair value adjustments do not necessarily result in
the recognition of profits or losses within the income statement. For example, as models are enhanced, fair value adjustments may no
longer be required. Similarly, fair value adjustments will decrease when the related positions are unwound, but this may not result in
profit or loss.
We reallocated our reporting of Markets Treasury and the funding costs of HSBC Holdings debt from Corporate Centre to the global
businesses. Comparative data have been re-presented accordingly.
Fair value adjustment changes were mainly driven by an increase in inception profit (Day 1 P&L reserves), and an increase in credit
valuation adjustment (‘CVA’) due to widening credit spreads and changes to derivative exposures caused by interest rates moves.
Bid-offer
IFRS 13 ‘Fair value measurement’ requires the use of the price within the bid-offer spread that is most representative of fair value.
Valuation models will typically generate mid-market values. The bid-offer adjustment reflects the extent to which bid-offer costs would
be incurred if substantially all residual net portfolio market risks were closed using available hedging instruments or by disposing of or
unwinding the position.
Uncertainty
Certain model inputs may be less readily determinable from market data and/or the choice of model itself may be more subjective.
In these circumstances, an adjustment may be necessary to reflect the likelihood that market participants would adopt more
conservative values for uncertain parameters and/or model assumptions than those used in HSBC’s valuation model.
Credit and debt valuation adjustments
The credit valuation adjustment (‘CVA’) is an adjustment to the valuation of over-the-counter (‘OTC’) derivative contracts to reflect the
possibility that the counterparty may default and that HSBC may not receive the full market value of the transactions.
The debt valuation adjustment (‘DVA’) is an adjustment to the valuation of OTC derivative contracts to reflect the possibility that HSBC
may default, and that it may not pay the full market value of the transactions.
HSBC calculates a separate CVA and DVA for each legal entity, and for each counterparty to which the entity has exposure. With the
exception of central clearing parties, all third-party counterparties are included in the CVA and DVA calculations, and these adjustments
are not netted across Group entities.
HSBC calculates the CVA by applying the probability of default (‘PD’) of the counterparty, conditional on the non-default of HSBC,
to HSBC’s expected positive exposure to the counterparty and multiplying the result by the loss expected in the event of default.
Conversely, HSBC calculates the DVA by applying the PD of HSBC, conditional on the non-default of the counterparty, to the expected
positive exposure of the counterparty to HSBC and multiplying the result by the loss expected in the event of default. Both calculations
are performed over the life of the potential exposure.
For most products HSBC uses a simulation methodology, which incorporates a range of potential exposures over the life of the portfolio,
to calculate the expected positive exposure to a counterparty. The simulation methodology includes credit mitigants, such as
counterparty netting agreements and collateral agreements with the counterparty.
The methodologies do not, in general, account for ‘wrong-way risk’. Wrong-way risk is an adverse correlation between the
counterparty’s probability of default and the mark-to-market value of the underlying transaction. The risk can either be general, perhaps
related to the currency of the issuer country, or specific to the transaction concerned. When there is significant wrong-way risk, a trade-
specific approach is applied to reflect this risk in the valuation.
Funding fair value adjustment
The funding fair value adjustment (‘FFVA’) is calculated by applying future market funding spreads to the expected future funding
exposure of any uncollateralised component of the OTC derivative portfolio. The expected future funding exposure is calculated by a
simulation methodology, where available, and is adjusted for events that may terminate the exposure, such as the default of HSBC or
the counterparty. The FFVA and DVA are calculated independently.
Model limitation
Models used for portfolio valuation purposes may be based upon a simplified set of assumptions that do not capture all current and
future material market characteristics. In these circumstances, model limitation adjustments are adopted.
Inception profit (Day 1 P&L reserves)
Inception profit adjustments are adopted when the fair value estimated by a valuation model is based on one or more significant
unobservable inputs. The accounting for inception profit adjustments is discussed in Note 1.
Financial instruments measured at fair value using a valuation technique with significant unobservable inputs – Level 3
Assets Liabilities
Designated
and
otherwise
mandatorily
measured at
fair value
through
Financial Trading profit or Trading Designated
investments assets loss Derivatives Total liabilities at fair value Derivatives Total
$m $m $m $m $m $m $m $m $m
Private equity including strategic
investments 930 4 10,971 — 11,905 4 — — 4
Asset-backed securities 1,286 523 25 — 1,834 — — — —
Loans held for securitisation — — — — — — — — —
Structured notes — — — — — 29 5,301 — 5,330
Derivatives with monolines — — — 68 68 — — — —
Other derivatives — — — 2,602 2,602 — — 4,187 4,187
Other portfolios 1,438 1,972 481 — 3,891 129 5 1 135
At 31 Dec 2020 3,654 2,499 11,477 2,670 20,300 162 5,306 4,188 9,656
Balances from 2019 have been re-presented to disclose a consistent application of the levelling methodology. This resulted in an
increase of $2.9bn of assets in Level 3. ‘Other portfolios’ increased by $1.4bn and ‘Private equity including strategic investments’
increased by $1.5bn.
Level 3 instruments are present in both ongoing and legacy businesses. Loans held for securitisation, derivatives with monolines, certain
‘other derivatives’ and predominantly all Level 3 ABSs are legacy positions. HSBC has the capability to hold these positions.
Private equity including strategic investments
The fair value of a private equity investment (including strategic investments) is estimated on the basis of an analysis of the investee’s
financial position and results, risk profile, prospects and other factors; by reference to market valuations for similar entities quoted in an
active market; the price at which similar companies have changed ownership; or from published net asset values (‘NAVs’) received. If
necessary, adjustments are made to the NAV of funds to obtain the best estimate of fair value.
Asset-backed securities
While quoted market prices are generally used to determine the fair value of the asset-backed securities (‘ABSs’), valuation models are
used to substantiate the reliability of the limited market data available and to identify whether any adjustments to quoted market prices
are required. For certain ABSs, such as residential mortgage-backed securities, the valuation uses an industry standard model with
assumptions relating to prepayment speeds, default rates and loss severity based on collateral type, and performance, as appropriate.
The valuations output is benchmarked for consistency against observable data for securities of a similar nature.
Structured notes
The fair value of Level 3 structured notes is derived from the fair value of the underlying debt security, and the fair value of the
Financial statements
embedded derivative is determined as described in the paragraph below on derivatives. These structured notes comprise principally
equity-linked notes issued by HSBC, which provide the counterparty with a return linked to the performance of equity securities and
other portfolios.
Examples of the unobservable parameters include long-dated equity volatilities and correlations between equity prices, and interest and
foreign exchange rates.
Derivatives
OTC derivative valuation models calculate the present value of expected future cash flows, based upon ‘no arbitrage’ principles. For
many vanilla derivative products, the modelling approaches used are standard across the industry. For more complex derivative
products, there may be some differences in market practice. Inputs to valuation models are determined from observable market data
wherever possible, including prices available from exchanges, dealers, brokers or providers of consensus pricing. Certain inputs may not
be observable in the market directly, but can be determined from observable prices via model calibration procedures or estimated from
historical data or other sources.
1 Included in ‘financial investments: fair value gains/(losses)’ in the current year and ‘exchange differences’ in the consolidated statement of
comprehensive income.
Balances from 2019 have been re-presented to disclose a consistent application of the levelling methodology. The result of this is an
increase of $2.9bn of assets in Level 3. ‘Financial investments’ increased by $1.2bn and ‘Private equity including strategic investments
financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily measured at fair value’ increased by $1.7bn.
Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are deemed to occur at the end of each quarterly reporting period. Transfers into and
out of levels of the fair value hierarchy are primarily attributable to observability of valuation inputs and price transparency.
Effect of changes in significant unobservable assumptions to reasonably possible alternatives
Financial statements
1 ‘Derivatives, trading assets and trading liabilities’ are presented as one category to reflect the manner in which these instruments are risk-
managed.
Balances from 2019 have been re-presented to disclose a consistent application of the levelling methodology. The result of this is an
increase in ‘Financial investments reflected through OCI’ and ‘Financial asset designated and mandatorily measured at fair value
reflected in profit or loss’ of $59m and $86m respectively.
The sensitivity analysis aims to measure a range of fair values consistent with the application of a 95% confidence interval.
Methodologies take account of the nature of the valuation technique employed, as well as the availability and reliability of observable
proxy and historical data.
When the fair value of a financial instrument is affected by more than one unobservable assumption, the above table reflects the most
favourable or the most unfavourable change from varying the assumptions individually.
Key unobservable inputs to Level 3 financial instruments
The following table lists key unobservable inputs to Level 3 financial instruments and provides the range of those inputs at 31 December
2020.
At 31 Dec 2019
Assets
Loans and advances to banks 69,203 — 68,508 739 69,247
Loans and advances to customers 1,036,743 — 10,365 1,027,178 1,037,543
Reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading 240,862 16 240,199 691 240,906
Financial investments – at amortised cost 85,735 26,202 62,572 287 89,061
Liabilities
Deposits by banks 59,022 — 58,951 — 58,951
Customer accounts 1,439,115 — 1,439,362 150 1,439,512
Repurchase agreements – non-trading 140,344 — 140,344 — 140,344
Debt securities in issue 104,555 — 104,936 — 104,936
Subordinated liabilities 24,600 — 28,861 385 29,246
Other financial instruments not carried at fair value are typically short term in nature and reprice to current market rates frequently.
Accordingly, their carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value. They include cash and balances at central banks, items in
the course of collection from and transmission to other banks, Hong Kong Government certificates of indebtedness and Hong Kong
currency notes in circulation, all of which are measured at amortised cost.
Valuation
Fair value is an estimate of the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. It does not reflect the economic benefits and costs that HSBC expects to flow
from an instrument’s cash flow over its expected future life. Our valuation methodologies and assumptions in determining fair values for
which no observable market prices are available may differ from those of other companies.
Loans and advances to banks and customers
To determine the fair value of loans and advances to banks and customers, loans are segregated, as far as possible, into portfolios of
similar characteristics. Fair values are based on observable market transactions, when available. When they are unavailable, fair values
are estimated using valuation models incorporating a range of input assumptions. These assumptions may include: value estimates from
third-party brokers reflecting over-the-counter trading activity; forward-looking discounted cash flow models, taking account of expected
customer prepayment rates, using assumptions that HSBC believes are consistent with those that would be used by market participants
in valuing such loans; new business rates estimates for similar loans; and trading inputs from other market participants including
observed primary and secondary trades. From time to time, we may engage a third-party valuation specialist to measure the fair value of
a pool of loans.
The fair value of loans reflects expected credit losses at the balance sheet date and estimates of market participants’ expectations of
credit losses over the life of the loans, and the fair value effect of repricing between origination and the balance sheet date. For credit-
impaired loans, fair value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows over the time period they are expected to be recovered.
Financial investments
The fair values of listed financial investments are determined using bid market prices. The fair values of unlisted financial investments
are determined using valuation techniques that incorporate the prices and future earnings streams of equivalent quoted securities.
Deposits by banks and customer accounts
The fair values of on-demand deposits are approximated by their carrying value. For deposits with longer-term maturities, fair values are
estimated using discounted cash flows, applying current rates offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Debt securities in issue and subordinated liabilities
Fair values in debt securities in issue and subordinated liabilities are determined using quoted market prices at the balance sheet date
where available, or by reference to quoted market prices for similar instruments.
Repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading
Fair values of repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements that are held on a non-trading basis provide approximate carrying
amounts. This is due to the fact that balances are generally short dated.
HSBC Holdings
The methods used by HSBC Holdings to determine fair values of financial instruments for the purposes of measurement and disclosure
are described above.
Fair values of HSBC Holdings’ financial instruments not carried at fair value on the balance sheet
2020 2019
Carrying amount Fair value1 Carrying amount Fair value1
$m $m $m $m
Assets at 31 Dec
Loans and advances to HSBC undertakings 10,443 10,702 10,218 10,504
Financial investments – at amortised cost 17,485 17,521 16,106 16,121
Liabilities at 31 Dec
Amounts owed to HSBC undertakings 330 330 464 464
Debt securities in issue 64,029 67,706 56,844 59,140
Subordinated liabilities 17,916 22,431 18,361 22,536
1 Fair values (other than Level 1 financial investments) were determined using valuation techniques with observable inputs (Level 2).
14 Financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily measured at fair value through profit
or loss
2020 2019
Mandatorily Mandatorily
Designated at measured at fair Designated at fair measured at fair
fair value value Total value value Total
$m $m $m $m $m $m
Securities 2,492 39,088 41,580 2,344 35,808 38,152
– treasury and other eligible bills 635 26 661 630 31 661
– debt securities 1,857 5,250 7,107 1,714 4,838 6,552
– equity securities — 33,812 33,812 — 30,939 30,939
Loans and advances to banks and
customers — 2,988 2,988 1 4,555 4,556
Other — 985 985 — 919 919
At 31 Dec 2,492 43,061 45,553 2,345 41,282 43,627
1 Included within these figures are debt securities issued by banks and other financial institutions of $1,180m (2019 re-presented: $1,244m), of
which nil (2019: nil) are guaranteed by various governments.
2 Excludes asset-backed securities included under US Treasury and US Government agencies.
15 Derivatives
Notional contract amounts and fair values of derivatives by product contract type held by HSBC
Notional contract amount Fair value – Assets Fair value – Liabilities
Trading Hedging Trading Hedging Total Trading Hedging Total
$m $m $m $m $m $m $m $m
Foreign exchange 7,606,446 35,021 106,696 309 107,005 108,903 1,182 110,085
Interest rate 15,240,867 157,436 249,204 1,914 251,118 236,594 2,887 239,481
Equities 652,288 — 14,043 — 14,043 15,766 — 15,766
Credit 269,401 — 2,590 — 2,590 3,682 — 3,682
Commodity and other 120,259 — 2,073 — 2,073 3,090 — 3,090
Gross total fair values 23,889,261 192,457 374,606 2,223 376,829 368,035 4,069 372,104
Offset (Note 30) (69,103) (69,103)
At 31 Dec 2020 23,889,261 192,457 374,606 2,223 307,726 368,035 4,069 303,001
Foreign exchange 8,207,629 31,899 84,083 455 84,538 84,498 740 85,238
Interest rate 17,895,349 177,006 183,668 1,208 184,876 175,095 2,031 177,126
Equities 1,077,347 — 9,053 — 9,053 11,237 — 11,237
Credit 345,644 — 4,744 — 4,744 5,597 — 5,597
Commodity and other 93,245 — 1,523 — 1,523 2,038 — 2,038
Gross total fair values 27,619,214 208,905 283,071 1,663 284,734 278,465 2,771 281,236
Offset (Note 30) (41,739) (41,739)
At 31 Dec 2019 27,619,214 208,905 283,071 1,663 242,995 278,465 2,771 239,497
The notional contract amounts of derivatives held for trading purposes and derivatives designated in hedge accounting relationships
indicate the nominal value of transactions outstanding at the balance sheet date. They do not represent amounts at risk.
Derivative assets and liabilities increased during 2020, driven by yield curve movements and changes in foreign exchange rates.
Notional contract amounts and fair values of derivatives by product contract type held by HSBC Holdings with subsidiaries
Notional contract amount Assets Liabilities
Trading Hedging Trading Hedging Total Trading Hedging Total
$m $m $m $m $m $m $m $m
Foreign exchange 23,413 — 506 — 506 870 — 870
Interest rate 47,569 34,006 966 3,221 4,187 2,176 8 2,184
At 31 Dec 2020 70,982 34,006 1,472 3,221 4,693 3,046 8 3,054
Financial statements
Use of derivatives
For details regarding the use of derivatives, see page 186 under ‘Market risk’.
Trading derivatives
Most of HSBC’s derivative transactions relate to sales and trading activities. Sales activities include the structuring and marketing of
derivative products to customers to enable them to take, transfer, modify or reduce current or expected risks. Trading activities include
market-making and risk management. Market-making entails quoting bid and offer prices to other market participants for the purpose of
generating revenue based on spread and volume. Risk management activity is undertaken to manage the risk arising from client
transactions, with the principal purpose of retaining client margin. Other derivatives classified as held for trading include non-qualifying
hedging derivatives.
Substantially all of HSBC Holdings’ derivatives entered into with subsidiaries are managed in conjunction with financial liabilities
designated at fair value.
Unamortised balance of derivatives valued using models with significant unobservable inputs
2020 2019
Footnotes $m $m
Unamortised balance at 1 Jan 73 86
Deferral on new transactions 232 145
Recognised in the income statement during the year: (205) (154)
– amortisation (116) (80)
– subsequent to unobservable inputs becoming observable (4) (3)
– maturity, termination or offsetting derivative (85) (71)
Exchange differences 4 1
Other — (5)
Unamortised balance at 31 Dec 1 104 73
1 The notional contract amounts of derivatives designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships indicate the nominal value of transactions
outstanding at the balance sheet date. They do not represent amounts at risk.
2 Used in effectiveness testing; comprising the full fair value change of the hedging instrument not excluding any component.
3 The hedged risk ‘interest rate’ includes inflation risk.
1 Used in effectiveness testing; comprising amount attributable to the designated hedged risk that can be a risk component.
2 The accumulated amount of fair value adjustments remaining in the statement of financial position for hedged items that have ceased to be
adjusted for hedging gains and losses were assets of $855m for FVOCI and assets of $17m for debt issued.
3 The hedged risk ‘interest rate’ includes inflation risk.
1 The notional contract amounts of derivatives designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships indicate the nominal value of transactions
outstanding at the balance sheet date; they do not represent amounts at risk.
2 Used in effectiveness testing; comprising the full fair value change of the hedging instrument not excluding any component.
3 The hedged risk ‘interest rate’ includes foreign exchange risk.
4 The notional amount of non-dynamic fair value hedges is equal to $34,006m, of which the weighted-average maturity date is February 2028 and
the weighted-average swap rate is 1.71%. The majority of these hedges are internal to the Group.
1 Used in effectiveness testing; comprising amount attributable to the designated hedged risk that can be a risk component.
2 The accumulated amount of fair value adjustments remaining in the statement of financial position for hedged items that have ceased to be
adjusted for hedging gains and losses were liabilities of $62.8m for debt issued.
3 The hedged risk ‘interest rate’ includes foreign exchange risk.
Sources of hedge ineffectiveness may arise from basis risk, including but not limited to the discount rates used for calculating the fair
value of derivatives, hedges using instruments with a non-zero fair value, and notional and timing differences between the hedged items
and hedging instruments.
For some debt securities held, HSBC manages interest rate risk in a dynamic risk management strategy. The assets in scope of this
strategy are high-quality fixed-rate debt securities, which may be sold to meet liquidity and funding requirements.
The interest rate risk of the HSBC fixed-rate debt securities issued is managed in a non-dynamic risk management strategy.
1 The notional contract amounts of derivatives designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships indicate the nominal value of transactions
outstanding at the balance sheet date. They do not represent amounts at risk.
2 Used in effectiveness testing; comprising the full fair value change of the hedging instrument not excluding any component.
3 Used in effectiveness assessment; comprising amount attributable to the designated hedged risk that can be a risk component.
Sources of hedge ineffectiveness may arise from basis risk, including but not limited to timing differences between the hedged items
and hedging instruments and hedges using instruments with a non-zero fair value.
Fair value hedges 20,378 4,533 41,274 13,435 79,620 43,133 122,753
Cash flow hedges 5,724 6,594 15,750 15,979 44,047 10,206 54,253
At 31 Dec 2019 26,102 11,127 57,024 29,414 123,667 53,339 177,006
1 The notional contract amounts of interest rate derivatives designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships indicate the nominal value of
transactions outstanding at the balance sheet date; they do not represent amounts at risk.
During 2019, the main market event in scope of Ibor reform was the change to the calculation of Eonia to be calculated as the euro
short-term rate (‘€STR’) plus a fixed spread of 8.5 basis points. This event had no material impact to the valuation of components of
designated hedge accounting relationships and there were no discontinuations of existing designated relationships. The main market
events in scope of Ibor reform during 2020 were the changes applied by central clearing counterparties to remunerating euro and US
dollar collateral. While there was a minimal valuation impact to the derivatives in scope that are used for hedge accounting, these
changes had no discontinuation impact to any of the designated relationships affected.
Financial statements
For further details of Ibor transition, see ‘Areas of special interest’ in the Risk review on page 116.
16 Financial investments
1 Included within ‘fair value’ figures are debt securities issued by banks and other financial institutions of $62bn (2019: $61bn), of which $10bn
(2019: $11bn) are guaranteed by various governments.
2 Includes securities that are supported by an explicit guarantee issued by the US Government.
3 Excludes asset-backed securities included under US Government agencies and sponsored entities.
Debt securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income 61,833 123,740 42,831 32,132 260,536
Debt securities measured at amortised cost 5,472 14,395 21,431 33,961 75,259
At 31 Dec 2019 67,305 138,135 64,262 66,093 335,795
The maturity distributions of ABSs are presented in the above table on the basis of contractual maturity dates. The weighted average
yield for each range of maturities is calculated by dividing the annualised interest income for the year ended 31 December 2020 by the
book amount of debt securities at that date. The yields do not include the effect of related derivatives.
HSBC Holdings
The weighted average yield for each range of maturities is calculated by dividing the annualised interest income for the year ended
31 December 2020 by the book amount of debt securities at that date. The yields do not include the effect of related derivatives.
Assets pledged
Assets pledged as collateral include all assets categorised as encumbered in the disclosure on page 78 of the Pillar 3 Disclosures at 31 December 2020.
The amount of assets pledged to secure liabilities may be greater than the book value of assets utilised as collateral. For example, in the
case of securitisations and covered bonds, the amount of liabilities issued plus mandatory over-collateralisation is less than the book
value of the pool of assets available for use as collateral. This is also the case where assets are placed with a custodian or a settlement
agent that has a floating charge over all the assets placed to secure any liabilities under settlement accounts.
These transactions are conducted under terms that are usual and customary for collateralised transactions including, where relevant,
standard securities lending and borrowing, repurchase agreements and derivative margining. HSBC places both cash and non-cash
collateral in relation to derivative transactions.
Hong Kong currency notes in circulation are secured by the deposit of funds in respect of which the Hong Kong Government certificates
of indebtedness are held.
Financial assets pledged as collateral which the counterparty has the right to sell or repledge
2020 2019
$m $m
Trading assets 64,225 63,163
Financial investments 16,915 10,782
At 31 Dec 81,140 73,945
Collateral received
The fair value of assets accepted as collateral relating primarily to standard securities lending, reverse repurchase agreements, swaps of
securities and derivative margining that HSBC is permitted to sell or repledge in the absence of default was $447,101m
(2019: $468,798m). The fair value of any such collateral sold or repledged was $246,520m (2019: $304,261m).
HSBC is obliged to return equivalent securities. These transactions are conducted under terms that are usual and customary to standard
securities lending, reverse repurchase agreements and derivative margining.
Assets transferred
The assets pledged include transfers to third parties that do not qualify for derecognition, notably secured borrowings such as debt
securities held by counterparties as collateral under repurchase agreements and equity securities lent under securities lending
agreements, as well as swaps of equity and debt securities. For secured borrowings, the transferred asset collateral continues to be
recognised in full while a related liability, reflecting the Group’s obligation to repurchase the assets for a fixed price at a future date, is
also recognised on the balance sheet. Where securities are swapped, the transferred asset continues to be recognised in full. There is no
associated liability as the non-cash collateral received is not recognised on the balance sheet. The Group is unable to use, sell or pledge
the transferred assets for the duration of the transaction, and remains exposed to interest rate risk and credit risk on these pledged
assets. With the exception of ‘Other sales’ in the following table, the counterparty’s recourse is not limited to the transferred assets.
Transferred financial assets not qualifying for full derecognition and associated financial liabilities
Carrying amount of: Fair value of:
Transferred Associated Transferred Associated Net
assets liabilities assets liabilities position
$m $m $m $m $m
At 31 Dec 2020
Repurchase agreements 52,413 51,092
Securities lending agreements 38,364 124
Other sales (recourse to transferred assets only) 3,564 3,478 3,619 3,564 55
At 31 Dec 2019
Repurchase agreements 45,831 45,671
Securities lending agreements 35,122 3,225
Other sales (recourse to transferred assets only) 2,971 2,885 2,974 2,897 77
1 Principal associates are listed on recognised stock exchanges. The fair values are based on the quoted market prices of the shares held (Level 1 in
the fair value hierarchy).
At 31 Dec 2020
Country of incorporation HSBC’s
and principal place of Principal interest
Footnotes business activity %
People’s Republic of
Bank of Communications Co., Limited China Banking services 19.03
The Saudi British Bank 1 Saudi Arabia Banking services 31.00
1 In December 2020, HSBC purchased additional shares and increased its shareholding in The Saudi British Bank (‘SABB’) from 29.2% to 31.0%.
SABB will continue to be accounted for as an associate of HSBC.
A list of all associates and joint ventures is set out in Note 37.
Compared with 31 December 2019, the extent to which the VIU exceeds the carrying value (‘headroom’) decreased by $1.9bn. The
reduction in headroom was principally due to the impact on the VIU from BoCom's actual performance, which was lower than earlier
forecasts due to the impact of the Covid-19 outbreak and the disruption to global economic activity, downward revisions to
management's best estimates of BoCom's future earnings in the short to medium term, and the net impact of revisions to certain long-
Financial statements
term assumptions. Both the VIU and the carrying value increased due to the impact of foreign exchange movements.
In future periods, the VIU may increase or decrease depending on the effect of changes to model inputs. The main model inputs are
described below and are based on factors observed at period-end. The factors that could result in a change in the VIU and an
impairment include a short-term underperformance by BoCom, a change in regulatory capital requirements or an increase in uncertainty
regarding the future performance of BoCom resulting in a downgrade of the forecast of future asset growth or profitability. An increase
in the discount rate as a result of an increase in the risk premium or risk-free rates could also result in a reduction of VIU and an
impairment. At the point where the carrying value exceeds the VIU, impairment would be recognised.
If the Group did not have significant influence in BoCom, the investment would be carried at fair value rather than the current carrying
value.
Basis of recoverable amount
The impairment test was performed by comparing the recoverable amount of BoCom, determined by a VIU calculation, with its carrying
amount. The VIU calculation uses discounted cash flow projections based on management’s best estimates of future earnings available
to ordinary shareholders prepared in accordance with IAS 36. Significant management judgement is required in arriving at the best
estimate. There are two main components to the VIU calculation. The first component is management’s best estimate of BoCom’s
earnings, which is based on explicit forecasts over the short to medium term. This results in forecast earnings growth that is lower than
recent historical actual growth and also reflects the uncertainty arising from the current economic outlook. Earnings beyond the short to
medium term are then extrapolated into perpetuity using a long-term growth rate to derive a terminal value, which comprises the
majority of the VIU. The second component is the capital maintenance charge (‘CMC’), which is management’s forecast of the earnings
that need to be withheld in order for BoCom to meet regulatory capital requirements over the forecast period, meaning that CMC is
deducted when arriving at management’s estimate of future earnings available to ordinary shareholders. The principal inputs to the CMC
calculation include estimates of asset growth, the ratio of risk-weighted assets to total assets and the expected minimum regulatory
capital requirements. An increase in the CMC as a result of a change to these principal inputs would reduce VIU. Additionally,
management considers other factors, including qualitative factors, to ensure that the inputs to the VIU calculation remain appropriate.
Key assumptions in value-in-use calculation
We used a number of assumptions in our VIU calculation, in accordance with the requirements of IAS 36:
• Long-term profit growth rate: 3% (2019: 3%) for periods after 2024, which does not exceed forecast GDP growth in mainland China
and is consistent with forecasts by external analysts.
• Long-term asset growth rate: 3% (2019: 3%) for periods after 2024, which is the rate that assets are expected to grow to achieve
long-term profit growth of 3%.
• Discount rate: 11.37% (2019: 11.24%). This is based on a capital asset pricing model (‘CAPM’) calculation for BoCom, using market
data. Management also compares the rate derived from the CAPM with discount rates from external sources. The discount rate used
is within the range of 10.3% to 15.0% (2019: 10.0% to 15.0%) indicated by external sources. The increased rate reflects the net
impact of updates to certain components of CAPM due to elevated levels of risk arising from the impact of the Covid-19 outbreak and
the disruption to global economic activity.
• Expected credit losses (‘ECL’) as a percentage of customer advances: This ranges from 0.98% to 1.22% (2019: 0.95%) in the short to
medium term, reflecting increases due to the Covid-19 outbreak and BoCom's actual results. For periods after 2024, the ratio is
0.88% (2019: 0.76%), which is slightly higher than BoCom’s average ECL in recent years. This ratio was increased to reflect trends in
BoCom’s actual results in recent years of increasing ECL and of changes to BoCom’s loan portfolio.
• Risk-weighted assets as a percentage of total assets: This ranges from 61% to 62% (2019: 61%) in the short to medium term,
reflecting increases that may arise from higher ECL in the short term, followed by reductions that may arise from a subsequent
lowering of ECL and a continuation of the trend of strong retail loan growth. For periods after 2024, the ratio is 61% (2019: 61%).
These rates are similar to BoCom’s actual results in recent years and are slightly below forecasts disclosed by external analysts.
• Operating income growth rate: This ranges from 3.5% to 6.7% (2019: 4.9% to 9.4%) in the short to medium term, and is lower than
BoCom’s actual results in recent years and the forecasts disclosed by external analysts, reflecting economic pressures from the
Covid-19 outbreak, global trade tensions and industry developments in mainland China.
• Cost-income ratio: This ranges from 36.3% to 36.8% (2019: 37.1% to 38.8%) in the short to medium term. These ratios are similar to
BoCom's actual results in recent years and slightly higher than forecasts disclosed by external analysts.
• Effective tax rate: This ranges from 7.8% to 16.5% (2019: 12.0% to 17.0%) in the short to medium term, reflecting BoCom’s actual
results and an expected increase towards the long-term assumption through the forecast period. For periods after 2024, the rate is
16.8% (2019: 22.5%), which is higher than the recent historical average. This rate was reduced on expectations of a lower effective
tax rate in the long term, reflecting BoCom’s actual results in recent years and forecast financial asset composition, and forecasts
disclosed by external analysts.
• Capital requirements: This was based on a capital adequacy ratio of 11.5% (2019: 11.5%) and tier 1 capital adequacy ratio of 9.5%
(2019: 9.5%), based on the minimum regulatory requirements.
The following table shows the change to each key assumption in the VIU calculation that on its own would reduce the headroom to nil:
The following table further illustrates the impact on VIU of reasonably possible changes to key assumptions. This reflects the sensitivity
of the VIU to each key assumption on its own and it is possible that more than one favourable and/or unfavourable change may occur at
the same time. The selected rates of reasonably possible changes to key assumptions are largely based on external analysts’ forecasts,
which can change period to period.
Considering the interrelationship of the changes set out in the table above, management estimates that the reasonably possible range of
VIU is $18.2bn to $24.2bn (2019: $18.5bn to $22.8bn). The range is based on the favourable/unfavourable change in the earnings in the
short- to medium-term, and long-term expected credit losses as a percentage of customer advances as set out in the table above. All
other long-term assumptions, the discount rate and the basis of the CMC have been kept unchanged when determining the reasonably
possible range of the VIU.
Selected financial information of BoCom
The statutory accounting reference date of BoCom is 31 December. For the year ended 31 December 2020, HSBC included the
associate’s results on the basis of the financial statements for the 12 months ended 30 September 2020, taking into account changes in
the subsequent period from 1 October 2020 to 31 December 2020 that would have materially affected the results.
Reconciliation of BoCom’s total shareholders’ equity to the carrying amount in HSBC’s consolidated financial statements
At 30 Sep
2020 2019
$m $m
HSBC’s share of total shareholders’ equity 20,743 18,509
Goodwill and other intangible assets 505 473
Carrying amount 21,248 18,982
At 31 December 2020, the Group’s investment in SABB was sensitive to reasonably possible adverse changes in key assumptions
supporting the recoverable amount. The most sensitive inputs to the impairment test are set out in the following table. A reasonable
change in a single key assumption may not result in impairment, although taken together a combination of reasonable changes in key
assumptions could result in a recoverable amount that is lower than the carrying amount.
1 The Group acquired the remaining minority equity interest in HSBC Trinkaus & Burkhardt AG on 1 February 2021. The Group now owns 100% of
this subsidiary.
Details of the debt, subordinated debt and preference shares issued by the main subsidiaries to parties external to the Group are
included in Note 25 ‘Debt securities in issue’ and Note 28 ‘Subordinated liabilities’, respectively.
A list of all related undertakings is set out in Note 37. The principal countries of operation are the same as the countries and territories of
incorporation except for HSBC Life (International) Limited, which operates mainly in Hong Kong.
HSBC is structured as a network of regional banks and locally incorporated regulated banking entities. Each bank is separately
capitalised in accordance with applicable prudential requirements and maintains a capital buffer consistent with the Group’s risk
appetite for the relevant country or region. HSBC’s capital management process is incorporated in the annual operating plan, which is
approved by the Board.
HSBC Holdings is the primary provider of equity capital to its subsidiaries and also provides them with non-equity capital where
necessary. These investments are substantially funded by HSBC Holdings’ issuance of equity and non-equity capital, and by profit
retention. The net reduction in investments in subsidiaries was partly due to the impairment of HSBC Overseas Holdings (UK) Limited of
$0.4bn.
As part of its capital management process, HSBC Holdings seeks to maintain a balance between the composition of its capital and its
investment in subsidiaries. Subject to this, there is no current or foreseen impediment to HSBC Holdings’ ability to provide funding for
such investments. During 2020, consistent with the Group’s capital plan, the Group’s subsidiaries did not experience any significant
restrictions on paying dividends or repaying loans and advances. Also, there are no foreseen restrictions envisaged with regard to
planned dividends or payments. However, the ability of subsidiaries to pay dividends or advance monies to HSBC Holdings depends on,
among other things, their respective local regulatory capital and banking requirements, exchange controls, statutory reserves, and
financial and operating performance.
The amount of guarantees by HSBC Holdings in favour of other Group entities is set out in Note 32.
Financial statements
Information on structured entities consolidated by HSBC where HSBC owns less than 50% of the voting rights is included in Note 20
‘Structured entities’. In each of these cases, HSBC controls and consolidates an entity when it is exposed, or has rights, to variable
returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity.
20 Structured entities
HSBC is mainly involved with both consolidated and unconsolidated structured entities through the securitisation of financial assets,
conduits and investment funds, established either by HSBC or a third party.
Consolidated structured entities
Conduits
HSBC has established and manages two types of conduits: securities investment conduits (‘SICs’) and multi-seller conduits.
Securities investment conduits
The SICs purchase highly rated ABSs to facilitate tailored investment opportunities.
• At 31 December 2020, Solitaire, HSBC’s principal SIC, held $1.9bn of ABSs (2019: $2.1bn). It is currently funded entirely by
commercial paper (‘CP’) issued to HSBC. At 31 December 2020, HSBC held $2.1bn of CP (2019: $3.2bn).
Multi-seller conduit
HSBC’s multi-seller conduit was established to provide access to flexible market-based sources of finance for its clients. Currently, HSBC
bears risk equal to the transaction-specific facility offered to the multi-seller conduit, amounting to $9.6bn at 31 December 2020 (2019:
$12.4bn). First loss protection is provided by the originator of the assets, and not by HSBC, through transaction-specific credit
enhancements. A layer of secondary loss protection is provided by HSBC in the form of programme-wide enhancement facilities.
Securitisations
HSBC uses structured entities to securitise customer loans and advances it originates in order to diversify its sources of funding for asset
origination and capital efficiency purposes. The loans and advances are transferred by HSBC to the structured entities for cash or
synthetically through credit default swaps, and the structured entities issue debt securities to investors.
HSBC managed funds
HSBC has established a number of money market and non-money market funds. Where it is deemed to be acting as principal rather than
agent in its role as investment manager, HSBC controls these funds.
Other
HSBC has entered into a number of transactions in the normal course of business, which include asset and structured finance
transactions where it has control of the structured entity. In addition, HSBC is deemed to control a number of third-party managed funds
through its involvement as a principal in the funds.
Unconsolidated structured entities
The term ‘unconsolidated structured entities’ refers to all structured entities not controlled by HSBC. The Group enters into transactions
with unconsolidated structured entities in the normal course of business to facilitate customer transactions and for specific investment
opportunities.
The maximum exposure to loss from HSBC’s interests in unconsolidated structured entities represents the maximum loss it could incur
as a result of its involvement with these entities regardless of the probability of the loss being incurred.
• For commitments, guarantees and written credit default swaps, the maximum exposure to loss is the notional amount of potential
future losses.
• For retained and purchased investments and loans to unconsolidated structured entities, the maximum exposure to loss is the
carrying value of these interests at the balance sheet reporting date.
Financial statements
The maximum exposure to loss is stated gross of the effects of hedging and collateral arrangements that HSBC has entered into in order
to mitigate the Group's exposure to loss.
Securitisations
HSBC has interests in unconsolidated securitisation vehicles through holding notes issued by these entities. In addition, HSBC has
investments in ABSs issued by third-party structured entities.
HSBC managed funds
HSBC establishes and manages money market funds and non-money market investment funds to provide customers with investment
opportunities. Further information on funds under management is provided on page 90.
HSBC, as fund manager, may be entitled to receive management and performance fees based on the assets under management. HSBC
may also retain units in these funds.
Non-HSBC managed funds
HSBC purchases and holds units of third-party managed funds in order to facilitate business and meet customer needs.
Other
HSBC has established structured entities in the normal course of business, such as structured credit transactions for customers, to
provide finance to public and private sector infrastructure projects, and for asset and structured finance transactions.
In addition to the interests disclosed above, HSBC enters into derivative contracts, reverse repos and stock borrowing transactions with
structured entities. These interests arise in the normal course of business for the facilitation of third-party transactions and risk
management solutions.
HSBC sponsored structured entities
The amount of assets transferred to and income received from such sponsored structured entities during 2020 and 2019 were not
significant.
2020 2019
Footnotes $m $m
Goodwill 5,881 5,590
Present value of in-force long-term insurance business 9,435 8,945
Other intangible assets 1 5,127 5,628
At 31 Dec 20,443 20,163
1 Included within other intangible assets is internally generated software with a net carrying value of $4,452m (2019: $4,829m). During the year,
capitalisation of internally generated software was $1,934m (2019: $2,086m), impairment was $1,322m (2019: $38m) and amortisation was
$1,085m (2019: $947m).
Goodwill
Impairment testing
In previous years the Group’s annual impairment test in respect of goodwill allocated to each CGU was performed at 1 July. Beginning in
2020 the annual impairment test will be performed as at 1 October to better align the timing of the test with cash flow projections
approved by the Board. A review for indicators of impairment is undertaken at each subsequent quarter-end.
Basis of the recoverable amount
The recoverable amount of all CGUs to which goodwill has been allocated was equal to its value in use (‘VIU’) at each respective testing
date. The VIU is calculated by discounting management’s cash flow projections for the CGU. At 1 October 2020, all CGUs supporting
goodwill had a VIU larger than their respective carrying amounts. The key assumptions used in the VIU calculation for each individually
significant CGU that is not impaired are discussed below.
1 CGU tested as Europe – RBWM at 31 December 2019. Details regarding our change in global businesses are set out in Note 10.
At 1 October 2020, aggregate goodwill of $2,059m (1 July 2019: $2,938m; 31 December 2019: $2,126m) had been allocated to CGUs
that were not considered individually significant. The Group’s CGUs do not carry on their balance sheets any significant intangible assets
with indefinite useful lives, other than goodwill.
Management’s judgement in estimating the cash flows of a CGU
The cash flow projections for each CGU are based on plans approved by the Board. The Board challenges and endorses planning
assumptions in light of internal capital allocation decisions necessary to support our strategy, current market conditions and
macroeconomic outlook. For the 1 October 2020 impairment test, cash flow projections until the end of the first quarter of 2025 were
considered. As required by IFRSs, estimates of future cash flows exclude estimated cash inflows or outflows that are expected to arise
from restructuring initiatives before an entity has a constructive obligation to carry out the plan, and would therefore have recognised a
provision for restructuring costs.
Sensitivity of VIU to reasonably possible changes in key assumptions and changes to current assumptions to achieve nil headroom
Europe – WPB
In $bn (unless otherwise stated)
At 31 December 2020
Carrying amount 11.1
VIU 16.4
Impact on VIU
100 bps increase in the discount rate – single variable (2.3)
30% decrease in cash flow projections – single variable (6.0)
Cumulative impact of all changes (7.6)
Changes to key assumption to reduce headroom to nil – single variable
Discount rate – bps 271
Cash flows – % (26.5)
a provision for restructuring costs. For some businesses, this means that the benefit of certain strategic actions are not included in
this impairment assessment, including capital releases.
• Long-term growth rates: The long-term growth rate is used to extrapolate the cash flows in perpetuity because of the long-term
perspective of the businesses within the Group.
• Discount rates: Rates are based on a CAPM calculation considering market data for the businesses and geographies in which the
Group operates. Discount rates ranged from 8.5% to 9.7% for HSBC Bank plc's businesses.
Future software capitalisation
We will continue to invest in digital capabilities to meet our strategic objectives. However, software capitalisation within businesses
where impairment was identified will not resume until the performance outlook for each business indicates future profits are sufficient to
support capitalisation. The cost of additional software investment in these businesses will be recognised as an operating expense until
such time.
Sensitivity of estimates relating to non-financial assets
As explained in Note 1.2(a), estimates of future cash flows for cash-generating units (‘CGUs’) are made in the review of goodwill and
non-financial assets for impairment. Non-financial assets include other intangible assets shown above, and owned property, plant and
equipment and right-of-use assets (see Note 22). The most significant sources of estimation uncertainty are in respect of the goodwill
balances disclosed above. There are no non-financial asset balances relating to individual CGUs which involve estimation uncertainty
that represents a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment to the results and financial position of the Group within the next
financial year. Non-financial assets are widely distributed across CGUs within the legal entities of the Group, including Corporate Centre
assets that cannot be allocated to CGUs and are therefore tested for impairment at consolidated level, and the recoverable amounts of
other intangible assets, owned property, plant and equipment, and right-of-use assets cannot be lower than individual asset fair values
less costs to dispose, where relevant. At HSBC Holdings plc consolidated level, Corporate Centre assets that cannot be allocated to
CGUs within the legal entities of the Group were sensitive to reasonably possible adverse changes in cash flow projections and discount
rates, which could result in a recoverable amount that is lower than the carrying amount. Corporate Centre non-financial assets include
owned property, plant and equipment ($2.1bn), right-of-use assets ($0.6bn) and other intangible assets ($0.5bn). A 12% decrease in cash
flow projections or a 110bps increase in the discount rate (from 10.5% to 11.6%) would reduce the current CGU headroom ($27.5bn) to
nil.
Present value of in-force long-term insurance business
When calculating the present value of in-force long-term (‘PVIF’) insurance business, expected cash flows are projected after adjusting
for a variety of assumptions made by each insurance operation to reflect local market conditions, and management’s judgement of
future trends and uncertainty in the underlying assumptions is reflected by applying margins (as opposed to a cost of capital
methodology) including valuing the cost of policyholder options and guarantees using stochastic techniques.
Actuarial Control Committees of each key insurance entity meet on a quarterly basis to review and approve PVIF assumptions. All
changes to non-economic assumptions, economic assumptions that are not observable and model methodologies must be approved by
the Actuarial Control Committee.
Movements in PVIF
2020 2019
Footnotes $m $m
At 1 Jan 8,945 7,149
Change in PVIF of long-term insurance business 382 1,749
– value of new business written during the year 776 1,225
– expected return 1 (1,003) (836)
– assumption changes and experience variances (see below) 604 1,378
– other adjustments 5 (18)
Exchange differences and other movements 108 47
At 31 Dec 9,435 8,945
1 ‘Expected return’ represents the unwinding of the discount rate and reversal of expected cash flows for the period.
1 For 2020, the calculation of France’s PVIF assumes a risk discount rate of 1.34% (2019: 1.27%) plus a risk margin of $213m (2019: $130m).
2020 2019
$m $m
Prepayments and accrued income 8,114 9,057
Settlement accounts 17,316 14,744
Cash collateral and margin receivables 59,543 49,148
Assets held for sale 299 123
Bullion 20,151 14,830
Endorsements and acceptances 10,278 10,198
Reinsurers’ share of liabilities under insurance contracts (Note 4) 3,448 3,592
Employee benefit assets (Note 5) 10,450 8,280
Right-of-use assets 4,002 4,222
Owned property, plant and equipment 10,412 10,480
Other accounts 12,399 12,006
At 31 Dec 156,412 136,680
Prepayments, accrued income and other assets include $105,469m (2019: $92,979m) of financial assets, the majority of which are
measured at amortised cost.
23 Trading liabilities
2020 2019
Footnotes $m $m
Deposits by banks 1 6,689 4,187
Customer accounts 1 10,681 6,999
Other debt securities in issue (Note 25) 1,582 1,404
Other liabilities – net short positions in securities 56,314 70,580
At 31 Dec 75,266 83,170
1 ‘Deposits by banks’ and ‘Customer accounts’ include repos, stock lending and other amounts.
HSBC
2020 2019
Footnotes $m $m
Deposits by banks and customer accounts 1, 2 19,176 17,660
Financial statements
1 Structured deposits placed at HSBC Bank USA are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a US government agency, up to
$250,000 per depositor.
2 In 2020, cash prime brokerage balances of $3,889m have been presented as a single balance, resulting in a reclassification from customer
accounts at amortised cost to provide more relevant information on the effect of these transactions on the Group’s financial position.
Comparatives have not been re-presented.
The carrying amount of financial liabilities designated at fair value was $9,333m more than the contractual amount at maturity
(2019: $6,120m more). The cumulative amount of change in fair value attributable to changes in credit risk was a loss of $2,542m (2019:
loss of $2,877m).
HSBC Holdings
2020 2019
$m $m
Debt securities in issue (Note 25) 19,624 24,687
Subordinated liabilities (Note 28) 6,040 5,616
At 31 Dec 25,664 30,303
The carrying amount of financial liabilities designated at fair value was $3,019m more than the contractual amount at maturity
(2019: $2,227m more). The cumulative amount of change in fair value attributable to changes in credit risk was a loss of $1,210m (2019:
$1,386m).
HSBC
2020 2019
$m $m
Bonds and medium-term notes 176,570 180,969
Other debt securities in issue 41,538 55,354
Total debt securities in issue 218,108 236,323
Included within:
– trading liabilities (Note 23) (1,582) (1,404)
– financial liabilities designated at fair value (Note 24) (121,034) (130,364)
At 31 Dec 95,492 104,555
HSBC Holdings
2020 2019
$m $m
Debt securities 83,653 81,531
Included within:
– financial liabilities designated at fair value (Note 24) (19,624) (24,687)
At 31 Dec 64,029 56,844
2020 2019
$m $m
Accruals and deferred income 10,406 11,808
Settlement accounts 13,008 14,356
Cash collateral and margin payables 65,557 56,646
Endorsements and acceptances 10,293 10,127
Employee benefit liabilities (Note 5) 2,025 1,771
Lease liabilities 4,614 4,604
Other liabilities 22,721 18,844
At 31 Dec 128,624 118,156
Accruals, deferred income and other liabilities include $120,229m (2019: $111,395m) of financial liabilities, the majority of which are
measured at amortised cost.
Legal proceedings
Restructuring and regulatory Customer Other
costs matters remediation provisions Total
$m $m $m $m $m
Provisions (excluding contractual commitments)
At 1 Jan 2020 356 605 1,646 280 2,887
Additions 698 347 189 222 1,456
Amounts utilised (322) (177) (739) (125) (1,363)
Unused amounts reversed (74) (75) (240) (80) (469)
Exchange and other movements 13 56 2 8 79
At 31 Dec 2020 671 756 858 305 2,590
Contractual commitments1
At 1 Jan 2020 511
Net change in expected credit loss provision and other
movements 577
At 31 Dec 2020 1,088
Total provisions
At 31 Dec 2019 3,398
At 31 Dec 2020 3,678
1 Contractual commitments include the provision for contingent liabilities measured under IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’ in respect of financial
guarantees and the expected credit loss provision on off-balance sheet guarantees and commitments.
Further details of ‘Legal proceedings and regulatory matters’ are set out in Note 34. Legal proceedings include civil court, arbitration or
tribunal proceedings brought against HSBC companies (whether by way of claim or counterclaim) or civil disputes that may, if not
settled, result in court, arbitration or tribunal proceedings. Regulatory matters refer to investigations, reviews and other actions carried
out by, or in response to the actions of, regulators or law enforcement agencies in connection with alleged wrongdoing by HSBC.
Customer remediation refers to HSBC’s activities to compensate customers for losses or damages associated with a failure to comply
with regulations or to treat customers fairly. Customer remediation is often initiated by HSBC in response to customer complaints and/or
industry developments in sales practices and is not necessarily initiated by regulatory action. Further details of customer remediation are
set out in this note.
At 31 December 2020, $0.3bn (2019: $1.1bn) of the customer remediation provision related to the estimated liability for redress in
respect of the possible mis-selling of payment protection insurance (‘PPI’) policies in previous years. Of the $1.1bn balance at 31
December 2019, $0.6bn has been utilised during 2020 and an unused release of $0.1bn was recognised.
Financial statements
At 31 December 2020, a provision of $0.3bn (2019: $0.3bn) was held relating to the estimated liability for redress payable to customers
following a review of historical collections and recoveries practices in the UK.
For further details of the impact of IFRS 9 on undrawn loan commitments and financial guarantees, presented in ‘Contractual
commitments’, see Note 32. This provision results from the adoption of IFRS 9 and has no comparatives. Further analysis of the
movement in the expected credit loss provision is disclosed within the 'Reconciliation of allowances for loans and advances to banks
and customers including loan commitments and financial guarantees' table on page 136.
28 Subordinated liabilities
Subordinated liabilities rank behind senior obligations and generally count towards the capital base of HSBC. Capital securities may be
called and redeemed by HSBC subject to prior notification to the PRA and, where relevant, the consent of the local banking regulator. If
not redeemed at the first call date, coupons payable may reset or become floating rate based on interbank rates. On subordinated
liabilities other than floating rate notes, interest is payable at fixed rates of up to 10.176%.
The balance sheet amounts disclosed in the following table are presented on an IFRS basis and do not reflect the amount that the
instruments contribute to regulatory capital, principally due to regulatory amortisation and regulatory eligibility limits.
$900m 10.176% non-cumulative step-up perpetual preferred securities, series 2 Jun 2030 900 900
900 900
Additional tier 1 capital securities guaranteed by HSBC Bank plc 1
£300m 5.862% non-cumulative step-up perpetual preferred securities 2 Apr 2020 — 420
£700m 5.844% non-cumulative step-up perpetual preferred securities Nov 2031 956 925
956 1,345
Tier 2 securities issued by HSBC Bank plc
$750m Undated floating rate primary capital notes Jun 1990 750 750
$500m Undated floating rate primary capital notes Sep 1990 500 500
$300m Undated floating rate primary capital notes, series 3 Jun 1992 300 300
$300m 7.65% subordinated notes — May 2025 300 300
1,850 1,850
3 The interest rate payable after November 2025 is the sum of the three-month sterling Libor plus 1.5 percentage points.
4 These securities are included in the capital base of HSBC, a subset of which are included in accordance with the grandfathering provisions under
CRR II, with the exception of $109m in relation to securities which matured 31 December 2020, settlement expected in June 2021, which are no
longer eligible for inclusion in the capital base of HSBC.
5 HSBC tendered for these securities in November 2019. The principal balance is $358m and $383m respectively. The original notional value of
these securities are $1,000m and $750m respectively.
6 HSBC tendered for these securities in 2017. In January 2018, a further tender was conducted. The principal balance is $507m. The original
notional of these securities is $2,939m. This instrument matured and settled in January 2021.
7 These securities are ineligible for inclusion in the capital base of HSBC.
8 These securities matured in 2020 and were redeemed.
1 Amounts owed to third parties represent securities included in the capital base of HSBC as tier 2 securities in accordance with the grandfathering
provisions under CRR II. Prior period figures are included on a CRD IV basis.
2 These securities are included in the capital base of HSBC as fully CRR II-compliant tier 2 securities on an end point basis.
3 These subordinated notes are measured at amortised cost in HSBC Holdings, where the interest rate risk is hedged using a fair value hedge,
while they are measured at fair value in the Group.
4 This security was called by HSBC Holdings on 22 November 2019 and was redeemed and cancelled on 17 January 2020. Between the date of
exercise of the call option and the redemption, this security was considered to be a subordinated liability. Refer to Note 31 for further details on
additional tier 1 securities.
The table on page 348 provides an analysis of consolidated total assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet commitments by residual
contractual maturity at the balance sheet date. These balances are included in the maturity analysis as follows:
• Trading assets and liabilities (including trading derivatives but excluding reverse repos, repos and debt securities in issue) are
included in the ‘Due not more than 1 month’ time bucket, because trading balances are typically held for short periods of time.
• Financial assets and liabilities with no contractual maturity (such as equity securities) are included in the ‘Due over 5 years’ time
bucket. Undated or perpetual instruments are classified based on the contractual notice period, which the counterparty of the
instrument is entitled to give. Where there is no contractual notice period, undated or perpetual contracts are included in the
‘Due over 5 years’ time bucket.
• Non-financial assets and liabilities with no contractual maturity are included in the ‘Due over 5 years’ time bucket.
• Financial instruments included within assets and liabilities of disposal groups held for sale are classified on the basis of the
contractual maturity of the underlying instruments and not on the basis of the disposal transaction.
• Liabilities under insurance contracts are included in the ‘Due over 5 years’ time bucket. Liabilities under investment contracts
are classified in accordance with their contractual maturity. Undated investment contracts are included in the ‘Due over 5 years’ time
bucket, although such contracts are subject to surrender and transfer options by the policyholders.
• Loan and other credit-related commitments are classified on the basis of the earliest date they can be drawn down.
Financial statements
HSBC
Total liabilities at 31 Dec 2019 1,939,350 120,040 64,004 34,965 31,101 51,439 72,351 209,234 2,522,484
Off-balance sheet commitments given
Loan and other credit-related commitments 794,336 600 590 313 551 442 458 318 797,608
– personal 221,952 40 39 56 167 208 392 299 223,153
– corporate and commercial 460,569 117 96 52 381 218 66 19 461,518
– financial 111,815 443 455 205 3 16 — — 112,937
HSBC Holdings
Financial assets
Cash at bank and in hand:
– balances with HSBC undertakings 2,382 — — — — — — — 2,382
Derivatives 596 — — — — — 230 1,176 2,002
Loans and advances to HSBC undertakings 102 672 120 25 — 600 1,909 6,790 10,218
Loans and advances to HSBC undertakings
designated at fair value — — — — — 458 24,845 36,661 61,964
Financial investments in HSBC undertakings 2,754 3,493 1,873 2,251 2,721 3,014 — — 16,106
Accrued income and other financial assets 93 277 97 48 16 12 — — 543
Total financial assets at 31 Dec 2019 5,927 4,442 2,090 2,324 2,737 4,084 26,984 44,627 93,215
Non-financial assets — — — — — — — 162,025 162,025
Total assets at 31 Dec 2019 5,927 4,442 2,090 2,324 2,737 4,084 26,984 206,652 255,240
Financial liabilities
Amounts owed to HSBC undertakings — 464 — — — — — — 464
Financial liabilities designated at fair value — — — — — 5,651 6,710 17,942 30,303
– debt securities in issue — — — — — 5,651 6,710 12,326 24,687
– subordinated liabilities and preferred securities — — — — — — — 5,616 5,616
Derivatives 1,838 — — — — 20 85 78 2,021
Debt securities in issue — — — — — 10,134 23,786 22,924 56,844
Accruals and other financial liabilities 900 574 303 55 10 — — 35 1,877
Subordinated liabilities 1,503 — — — — — 2,076 14,782 18,361
Total financial liabilities at 31 Dec 2019 4,241 1,038 303 55 10 15,805 32,657 55,761 109,870
Non-financial liabilities — — — — — — — 326 326
Total liabilities at 31 Dec 2019 4,241 1,038 303 55 10 15,805 32,657 56,087 110,196
Off-balance sheet commitments given
Undrawn formal standby facilities, credit lines
and other commitments to lend — — — — — — — — —
Cash flows payable by HSBC under financial liabilities by remaining contractual maturities
Due over Due over Due over
1 month but 3 months but 1 year but not
Due not more not more than not more than more than Due over
than 1 month 3 months 1 year 5 years 5 years Total
$m $m $m $m $m $m
Deposits by banks 61,001 1,442 1,639 17,352 632 82,066
Customer accounts 1,530,584 64,809 40,755 7,720 153 1,644,021
Repurchase agreements – non-trading 102,664 3,984 3,257 1,058 1,017 111,980
Trading liabilities 75,266 — — — — 75,266
Financial liabilities designated at fair value1 18,815 7,556 19,243 59,835 55,475 160,924
Derivatives 300,158 356 579 1,830 2,128 305,051
Debt securities in issue 6,551 12,709 29,520 28,787 24,075 101,642
Subordinated liabilities 739 170 1,102 7,024 28,812 37,847
Other financial liabilities 140,094 9,120 5,113 5,030 2,887 162,244
2,235,872 100,146 101,208 128,636 115,179 2,681,041
Loan and other credit-related commitments 842,945 434 740 480 171 844,770
Financial guarantees2 18,200 13 93 37 41 18,384
At 31 Dec 2020 3,097,017 100,593 102,041 129,153 115,391 3,544,195
Proportion of cash flows payable in period 87% 3% 3% 4% 3%
1 In 2020, cash prime brokerage balances of $3,889m have been presented as a single balance, resulting in a reclassification from customer
accounts at amortised cost to provide more relevant information on the effect of these transactions on the Group’s financial position.
Comparatives have not been re-presented.
2 Excludes performance guarantee contracts to which the impairment requirements in IFRS 9 are not applied.
HSBC Holdings
HSBC Holdings’ primary sources of liquidity are dividends received from subsidiaries, interest on and repayment of intra-Group loans
and securities, and interest earned on its own liquid funds. HSBC Holdings also raises funds in the debt capital markets to meet the
Group’s minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities. HSBC Holdings uses this liquidity to meet its obligations, including
interest and principal repayments on external debt liabilities, operating expenses and collateral on derivative transactions.
HSBC Holdings is also subject to contingent liquidity risk by virtue of credit-related commitments and guarantees and similar contracts
issued relating to its subsidiaries. Such commitments and guarantees are only issued after due consideration of HSBC Holdings’ ability
to finance the commitments and guarantees and the likelihood of the need arising.
Financial statements
HSBC Holdings actively manages the cash flows from its subsidiaries to optimise the amount of cash held at the holding company level.
During 2020, consistent with the Group’s capital plan, the Group’s subsidiaries did not experience any significant restrictions on paying
dividends or repaying loans and advances. Also, there are no foreseen restrictions envisaged with regard to planned dividends or
payments. However, the ability of subsidiaries to pay dividends or advance monies to HSBC Holdings depends on, among other things,
their respective local regulatory capital and banking requirements, exchange controls, statutory reserves, and financial and operating
performance.
HSBC Holdings currently has sufficient liquidity to meet its present requirements.
Liquidity risk in HSBC Holdings is overseen by Holdings ALCO. This risk arises because of HSBC Holdings’ obligation to make payments
to debt holders as they fall due and to pay its operating expenses. The liquidity risk related to these cash flows is managed by matching
external debt obligations with internal loan cash flows and by maintaining an appropriate liquidity buffer that is monitored by Holdings
ALCO.
The balances in the following table are not directly comparable with those on the balance sheet of HSBC Holdings as the table
incorporates, on an undiscounted basis, all cash flows relating to principal and future coupon payments (except for derivatives not
treated as hedging derivatives). Undiscounted cash flows payable in relation to hedging derivative liabilities are classified according to
their contractual maturities. Derivatives not treated as hedging derivatives are included in the ‘On demand’ time bucket.
In addition, loan commitments and financial guarantees and similar contracts are generally not recognised on our balance sheet. The
undiscounted cash flows potentially payable under financial guarantees and similar contracts are classified on the basis of the earliest
date on which they can be called.
Cash flows payable by HSBC Holdings under financial liabilities by remaining contractual maturities
Due over 1 Due over 3 Due over 1
month but not months but year but not
Due not more more than 3 not more than more than 5 Due over
than 1 month months 1 year years 5 years Total
Footnotes $m $m $m $m $m $m
Amounts owed to HSBC undertakings — 330 — — — 330
Financial liabilities designated at fair value 70 1,109 1,412 9,110 16,104 27,805
Derivatives 3,085 — 2 — — 3,087
Debt securities in issue 135 760 3,354 31,567 37,103 72,919
Subordinated liabilities 82 156 726 7,513 21,552 30,029
Other financial liabilities 3,769 690 370 — 36 4,865
7,141 3,045 5,864 48,190 74,795 139,035
Loan commitments — — — — — —
Financial guarantees 1 13,787 — — — — 13,787
At 31 Dec 2020 20,928 3,045 5,864 48,190 74,795 152,822
1 Excludes performance guarantee contracts to which the impairment requirements in IFRS 9 are not applied.
In the following table, the ‘Amounts not set off in the balance sheet’ include transactions where:
• the counterparty has an offsetting exposure with HSBC and a master netting or similar arrangement is in place with a right to set off
only in the event of default, insolvency or bankruptcy, or the offset criteria are otherwise not satisfied; and
• in the case of derivatives and reverse repurchase/repurchase, stock borrowing/lending and similar agreements, cash and non-cash
collateral has been received/pledged.
For risk management purposes, the net amounts of loans and advances to customers are subject to limits, which are monitored and the
relevant customer agreements are subject to review and updated, as necessary, to ensure the legal right to set off remains appropriate.
Amounts not
Net subject to
amounts in enforceable
Gross Amounts the balance Financial Non-cash Cash Net netting
amounts offset sheet instruments collateral collateral amount arrangements5 Total
Footnotes $m $m $m $m $m $m $m $m $m
Financial assets
Derivatives (Note 15) 1 368,057 (69,103) 298,954 (230,758) (13,766) (48,154) 6,276 8,772 307,726
Reverse repos, stock
borrowing and similar
agreements classified as: 2
Derivatives (Note 15) 1 277,261 (41,739) 235,522 (171,371) (13,095) (47,404) 3,652 7,473 242,995
Reverse repos, stock
borrowing and similar
agreements classified as: 2
Financial liabilities
Derivatives (Note 15) 1 364,121 (69,103) 295,018 (230,758) (21,387) (37,343) 5,530 7,983 303,001
Repos, stock lending and
similar agreements
classified as: 2
Derivatives (Note 15) 1 275,286 (41,739) 233,547 (171,371) (20,137) (37,844) 4,195 5,950 239,497
Repos, stock lending and
similar agreements
classified as: 2
1 At 31 December 2020, the amount of cash margin received that had been offset against the gross derivatives assets was $7,899m (2019:
$2,350m). The amount of cash margin paid that had been offset against the gross derivatives liabilities was $17,955m (2019: $8,303m).
2 For the amount of repos, reverse repos, stock lending, stock borrowing and similar agreements recognised on the balance sheet within ‘Trading
assets’ $22,277m (2019: $21,350m) and ‘Trading liabilities’ $16,324m (2019: $10,260m), see the ‘Funding sources and uses’ table on page 178.
3 At 31 December 2020, the total amount of ‘Loans and advances to customers’ was $1,037,987m (2019: $1,036,743m), of which $20,101m
Financial statements
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of $0.50 each, issued and fully paid
2020 2019
Footnotes Number $m Number $m
At 1 Jan 20,638,524,545 10,319 20,360,841,496 10,180
Shares issued under HSBC employee share plans 55,096,555 28 71,588,032 36
Shares issued in lieu of dividends — — 341,872,011 171
Less: Shares repurchased and cancelled — — (135,776,994) (68)
At 31 Dec 1 20,693,621,100 10,347 20,638,524,545 10,319
1 All HSBC Holdings ordinary shares in issue, excluding 325,273,407 shares held in treasury, confer identical rights, including in respect of capital,
dividends and voting.
2 In 2019 this security was included in the capital base of HSBC as additional tier 1 capital in accordance with the CRR II rules, by virtue of the
application of grandfathering provisions. This security was called by HSBC Holdings on 10 December 2020 and was redeemed and cancelled on
13 January 2021. Between the date of exercise of the call option and the redemption, this security was considered as an other liability.
1 This security was called by HSBC Holdings on 22 November 2019 and was redeemed and cancelled on 17 January 2020. Between the date of
exercise of the call option and the redemption, this security was considered to be a subordinated liability. See Note 28.
2 This security was issued by HSBC Holdings on 17 December 2020. The first call date commences six calendar months prior to the reset date of
17 June 2031.
The preceding table discloses the nominal principal amounts of off-balance sheet liabilities and commitments for the Group, which
represent the maximum amounts at risk should the contracts be fully drawn upon and the clients default. As a significant portion of
guarantees and commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total of the nominal principal amounts is not
indicative of future liquidity requirements. The expected credit loss provision relating to guarantees and commitments under IFRS 9 is
disclosed in Note 27.
The majority of the guarantees have a term of less than one year, while guarantees with terms of more than one year are subject to
HSBC’s annual credit review process.
Contingent liabilities arising from legal proceedings, regulatory and other matters against Group companies are excluded from this note
but are disclosed in Notes 27 and 34.
Associates
HSBC’s share of associates’ contingent liabilities, contractual commitments and guarantees amounted to $53.1bn at 31 December 2020
(2019: $46.7bn). No matters arose where HSBC was severally liable.
HSBC leases a variety of assets to third parties under finance leases, including transport assets (such as aircraft), property and general
plant and machinery. At the end of lease terms, assets may be sold to third parties or leased for further terms. Rentals are calculated to
recover the cost of assets less their residual value, and earn finance income.
2020 2019
Total future Unearned Total future Unearned
minimum finance Present minimum finance Present
payments income value payments income value
$m $m $m $m $m $m
Lease receivables:
No later than one year 3,108 (257) 2,851 1,674 (157) 1,517
One to two years 2,476 (196) 2,280 1,634 (155) 1,479
Two to three years 2,055 (143) 1,912 1,889 (151) 1,738
Three to four years 1,380 (109) 1,271 1,704 (136) 1,568
Four to five years 787 (80) 707 1,558 (132) 1,426
Later than one year and no later than five years 6,698 (528) 6,170 6,785 (574) 6,211
Later than five years 4,221 (451) 3,770 6,136 (614) 5,522
At 31 Dec 14,027 (1,236) 12,791 14,595 (1,345) 13,250
HSBC is party to legal proceedings and regulatory matters in a number of jurisdictions arising out of its normal business operations.
Apart from the matters described below, HSBC considers that none of these matters are material. The recognition of provisions is
determined in accordance with the accounting policies set out in Note 1. While the outcomes of legal proceedings and regulatory
matters are inherently uncertain, management believes that, based on the information available to it, appropriate provisions have been
made in respect of these matters as at 31 December 2020 (see Note 27). Where an individual provision is material, the fact that a
provision has been made is stated and quantified, except to the extent that doing so would be seriously prejudicial. Any provision
recognised does not constitute an admission of wrongdoing or legal liability. It is not practicable to provide an aggregate estimate
of potential liability for our legal proceedings and regulatory matters as a class of contingent liabilities.
Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Bernard L. Madoff (‘Madoff’) was arrested in December 2008 and later pleaded guilty to running a Ponzi scheme. His firm, Bernard L.
Madoff Investment Securities LLC (‘Madoff Securities’), is being liquidated in the US by a trustee (the ‘Trustee’).
Various non-US HSBC companies provided custodial, administration and similar services to a number of funds incorporated outside the
US whose assets were invested with Madoff Securities. Based on information provided by Madoff Securities as at 30 November 2008,
the purported aggregate value of these funds was $8.4bn, including fictitious profits reported by Madoff.
Based on information available to HSBC, the funds’ actual transfers to Madoff Securities minus their actual withdrawals from Madoff
Securities during the time HSBC serviced the funds are estimated to have totalled approximately $4bn. Various HSBC companies have
been named as defendants in lawsuits arising out of Madoff Securities’ fraud.
US litigation: The Trustee has brought lawsuits against various HSBC companies and others in the US Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York (the ‘US Bankruptcy Court’), seeking recovery of transfers from Madoff Securities to HSBC in an amount
not yet pleaded or determined. HSBC and other parties to the actions have moved to dismiss the Trustee’s claims. The US Bankruptcy
Court granted HSBC’s motion to dismiss with respect to certain of the Trustee’s claims in November 2016. In February 2019, the US
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the ‘Second Circuit Court of Appeals’) reversed that dismissal. Following the US Supreme
Court’s denial of certiorari in June 2020, the cases were remanded to the US Bankruptcy Court, where they are now pending.
Fairfield Sentry Limited, Fairfield Sigma Limited and Fairfield Lambda Limited (together, ‘Fairfield’) (in liquidation since July 2009) have
brought a lawsuit in the US against fund shareholders, including HSBC companies that acted as nominees for clients, seeking restitution
of redemption payments. In December 2018, the US Bankruptcy Court issued an opinion, which ruled in favour of the defendants’
motion to dismiss in respect of certain claims by the liquidators for Fairfield and granted a motion by the liquidators to file amended
complaints. As a result of that opinion, all claims against one of the HSBC companies, and certain claims against the remaining HSBC
defendants, were dismissed. In May 2019, the liquidators appealed certain issues from the US Bankruptcy Court to the US District Court
for the Southern District of New York (the ’New York District Court’) and, in January 2020, the liquidators filed amended complaints on
the claims remaining in the US Bankruptcy Court. In March 2020, HSBC and other parties to the action moved to dismiss the amended
complaints in the US Bankruptcy Court. In December 2020, the US Bankruptcy Court granted in part and denied in part the defendants’
motion. This action remains pending in the US Bankruptcy Court and the New York District Court.
HSBC Bank USA N.A. (‘HSBC Bank USA’), HSBC North America Holdings Inc. and HSBC USA Inc. (the ‘Nominal Corporate Defendants’)
in New York state court against certain current and former directors and officers of the Nominal Corporate Defendants (the ‘Individual
Defendants’). The complaint alleges that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Nominal Corporate Defendants
and caused a waste of corporate assets by allegedly permitting and/or causing the conduct underlying the five-year deferred prosecution
agreement with the US Department of Justice (‘DoJ’), entered into in December 2012. In November 2015, the New York state court
granted the Nominal Corporate Defendants’ motion to dismiss, but the appellate court reversed the decision in November 2018 and
reinstated the action. In June 2020, the parties reached an agreement to resolve this derivative action, under which HSBC has received a
payment from directors and officers liability insurance providers and will continue for a period of time certain corporate governance
practices. In November 2020, the court issued an order granting final settlement approval and dismissing the action. This matter is now
concluded.
Since November 2014, a number of lawsuits have been filed in federal courts in the US against various HSBC companies and others on
behalf of plaintiffs who are, or are related to, victims of terrorist attacks in the Middle East or of cartel violence in Mexico. In each case, it
is alleged that the defendants aided and abetted the unlawful conduct of various sanctioned parties in violation of the US Anti-Terrorism
Act. Currently, 10 actions remain pending in federal courts in New York or the District of Columbia. In March, September and October
2019, the courts granted HSBC’s motions to dismiss in three of these cases. In October 2020, the appellate court affirmed the dismissal
of one of the actions on appeal. An appeal remains pending in another case, and plaintiffs are seeking certification to appeal in the third
case. HSBC filed motions to dismiss in three further cases, with two of the motions granted in June 2020, and the third granted in
November 2020. These dismissals are subject to appeal. The four remaining actions are at a very early stage.
There are many factors that may affect the range of outcomes, and the resulting financial impact, of these matters, which could be
significant.
London interbank offered rates, European interbank offered rates and other benchmark interest rate
investigations and litigation
Euro interest rate derivatives: In December 2016, the European Commission (the ‘EC’) issued a decision finding that HSBC, among
other banks, engaged in anti-competitive practices in connection with the pricing of euro interest rate derivatives in early 2007. The EC
imposed a fine on HSBC based on a one-month infringement. HSBC appealed the decision and, in September 2019, the General Court of
the European Union (the ‘General Court’) issued a decision largely upholding the EC’s findings on liability but annulling the fine. HSBC
and the EC have both appealed the General Court’s decision to the European Court of Justice.
US dollar Libor: Beginning in 2011, HSBC and other panel banks have been named as defendants in a number of private lawsuits filed
in the US with respect to the setting of US dollar Libor. The complaints assert claims under various US laws, including US antitrust and
racketeering laws, the US Commodity Exchange Act (‘US CEA’) and state law. The lawsuits include individual and putative class actions,
most of which have been transferred and/or consolidated for pre-trial purposes before the New York District Court.
In 2017 and 2018, HSBC reached agreements with plaintiffs to resolve putative class actions brought on behalf of the following five
groups of plaintiffs: persons who purchased US dollar Libor-indexed bonds; persons who purchased US dollar Libor-indexed exchange-
traded instruments; US-based lending institutions that made or purchased US dollar Libor-indexed loans; persons who purchased US
dollar Libor-indexed interest rate swaps and other instruments directly from the defendant banks and their affiliates; and persons who
purchased US dollar Libor-indexed interest rate swaps and other instruments from certain financial institutions that are not the
defendant banks or their affiliates. The New York District Court has granted final approval of each of the five referenced settlements.
Additionally, a number of other US dollar Libor-related actions remain pending against HSBC in the New York District Court and the
Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
Intercontinental Exchange (‘ICE’) Libor: Between January and March 2019, HSBC and other panel banks were named as defendants
in three putative class actions filed in the New York District Court on behalf of persons and entities who purchased instruments paying
interest indexed to US dollar ICE Libor from a panel bank. The complaints allege, among other things, misconduct related to the
suppression of this benchmark rate in violation of US antitrust and state law. In July 2019, the three putative class actions were
consolidated, and the plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint. In March 2020, the court granted the defendants’ joint motion
to dismiss in its entirety. This matter is on appeal.
Singapore interbank offered rate (‘Sibor’), Singapore swap offer rate (‘SOR’) and Australia bank bill swap rate (‘BBSW’):
In July and August 2016, HSBC and other panel banks were named as defendants in two putative class actions filed in the New York
District Court on behalf of persons who transacted in products related to the Sibor, SOR and BBSW benchmark rates. The complaints
allege, among other things, misconduct related to these benchmark rates in violation of US antitrust, commodities and racketeering
laws, and state law.
In the Sibor/SOR litigation, following a decision on the defendants’ motion to dismiss in October 2018, the claims against a number of
HSBC entities were dismissed, and The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (‘HBAP’) remained as the only HSBC
defendant in this action. In October 2018, HBAP filed a motion for reconsideration of the decision based on the issue of personal
jurisdiction. This motion was denied in April 2019. Also in October 2018, the plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint naming only the
Sibor panel members, including HBAP, as defendants. The court dismissed the third amended complaint in its entirety in July 2019
against all defendants. In August 2019, the plaintiffs filed an appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which remains pending.
In the BBSW litigation, in November 2018, the court dismissed all foreign defendants, including all the HSBC entities, on personal
jurisdiction grounds. In April 2019, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, which the defendants moved to dismiss. In February 2020,
the court again dismissed the plaintiffs’ amended complaint against all the HSBC entities.
There are many factors that may affect the range of outcomes, and the resulting financial impact, of these matters, which could be
significant.
Foreign exchange-related investigations and litigation
Since at least 2014, the EC has been conducting an investigation into trading activities by a number of banks, including HSBC, in the
foreign exchange spot market. HSBC is cooperating with this investigation.
In January 2021, HSBC Holdings exited its three-year deferred prosecution agreement with the Criminal Division of the DoJ (the ‘FX
DPA’), regarding fraudulent conduct in connection with two particular transactions in 2010 and 2011. HSBC Holdings entered into the
FX DPA in January 2018, following the conclusion of the DoJ’s investigation into HSBC’s historical foreign exchange activities. Under
the terms of the FX DPA, the DoJ is expected to file a motion to dismiss the charges deferred by the FX DPA in due course.
In December 2016, Brazil’s Administrative Council of Economic Defense initiated an investigation into the onshore foreign exchange
market and identified a number of banks, including HSBC, as subjects of its investigation.
In June 2020, the Competition Commission of South Africa, having initially referred a complaint for proceedings before the South African
Competition Tribunal in February 2017, filed a revised complaint against 28 financial institutions, including HSBC Bank plc and HSBC
Bank USA, for alleged anti-competitive behaviour in the South African foreign exchange market. In August 2020, HSBC Bank plc and
HSBC Bank USA filed an application to dismiss the revised complaint, which remains pending.
In late 2013 and early 2014, various HSBC companies and other banks were named as defendants in various putative class actions
consolidated in the New York District Court. The consolidated complaint alleged, among other things, that the defendants conspired to
manipulate the WM/Reuters foreign exchange benchmark rates. In September 2015, HSBC reached an agreement with the plaintiffs
to resolve the consolidated action, and the court granted final approval of the settlement in August 2018.
A putative class action complaint making similar allegations on behalf of retail customers of foreign exchange products was filed in the
US District Court for the Northern District of California in 2015, and was subsequently transferred to the New York District Court where it
remains pending. In 2017, putative class action complaints making similar allegations on behalf of purported indirect purchasers of
foreign exchange products were filed in New York and were subsequently consolidated in the New York District Court. In April 2020,
HSBC reached an agreement with the plaintiffs to resolve the indirect purchaser action. In November 2020, the New York District Court
granted final approval of the settlement.
In September 2018, various HSBC companies and other banks were named as defendants in two motions for certification of class
actions filed in Israel alleging foreign exchange-related misconduct. In July 2019, the Tel Aviv Court allowed the plaintiffs to consolidate
their claims and, in September 2019, the plaintiffs filed a motion for certification of the consolidated class action. In August 2020, HSBC
against PBGB in the High Court of England and Wales by additional claimants. These actions are ongoing.
In June 2020, two separate claims were issued against HSBC UK Bank plc (as successor to PBGB’s business) by two separate groups of
investors in Eclipse film finance schemes in connection with PBGB’s role in the development of such schemes. These matters are at an
early stage.
In February 2020, a claim was issued against HSBC UK Bank plc (as successor to PBGB’s business) by two individuals in relation to the
Zeus film finance schemes. The claimants failed to serve the claim on time, and this claim has now lapsed. Separately, in June 2020,
HSBC UK Bank plc received an application for disclosure of documents by a law firm acting on behalf of a number of investors in the
Zeus film finance schemes. This application was dismissed by the court in November 2020.
It is possible that additional actions or investigations will be initiated against HSBC UK Bank plc as a result of PBGB’s historical
involvement in the provision of certain film finance-related services.
Based on the facts currently known, it is not practicable to predict the resolution of these matters, including the timing or any possible
impact on HSBC, which could be significant.
Related parties of the Group and HSBC Holdings include subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures, post-employment benefit plans for
HSBC employees, Key Management Personnel (‘KMP’) as defined by IAS 24, close family members of KMP and entities that are
controlled or jointly controlled by KMP or their close family members. KMP are defined as those persons having authority and
responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of HSBC Holdings. These individuals also constitute ‘senior
management’ for the purposes of the Hong Kong Listing Rules. In applying IAS 24, it was determined that for this financial reporting
period all KMP included Directors, former Directors and senior management listed on pages 198 to 203 and that the roles of Chief Legal
Officer, Group Head of Audit, Group Chief Human Resources Officer, Group Chief Compliance Officer, Group Company Secretary and
Chief Governance Officer did not meet the criteria for KMP as provided for in the standard.
Particulars of transactions with related parties are tabulated below. The disclosure of the year-end balance and the highest amounts
outstanding during the year is considered to be the most meaningful information to represent the amount of the transactions and
outstanding balances during the year.
Key Management Personnel
Details of Directors’ remuneration and interest in shares are disclosed in the ‘Directors’ remuneration report’ on pages 229 to 255.
IAS 24 ‘Related party disclosures’ requires the following additional information for key management compensation.
Advances and credits, guarantees and deposit balances during the year with Key Management Personnel
2020 2019
Highest amounts Highest amounts
Balance at outstanding Balance at outstanding
31 Dec during year 31 Dec during year
Footnotes $m $m $m $m
Key Management Personnel
Advances and credits 1 221 357 283 328
Guarantees 30 55 34 34
Deposits 281 874 268 659
1 Advances and credits entered into by subsidiaries of HSBC Holdings plc during 2020 with Directors and former Directors, disclosed pursuant to
section 413 of the Companies Act 2006, totalled $4.7m (2019: $3m).
Transactions and balances during the year with associates and joint ventures
2020 2019
Highest balance Balance at Highest balance Balance at
during the year 31 Dec during the year 31 Dec
$m $m $m $m
Unsubordinated amounts due from joint ventures 147 147 132 123
Unsubordinated amounts due from associates 4,330 2,942 4,554 2,054
Amounts due to associates 5,466 2,226 2,517 516
Amounts due to joint ventures 102 102 28 28
Guarantees and commitments 433 283 647 407
The above outstanding balances arose in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms, including interest rates
and security, as for comparable transactions with third-party counterparties.
Post-employment benefit plans
At 31 December 2020, $3.5bn (2019: $3.9bn re-presented) of HSBC post-employment benefit plan assets were under management by
HSBC companies, earning management fees of $13m in 2020 (2019: $8m). The 2019 plan assets under management by HSBC
companies have been re-presented to exclude $1.5bn of assets identified to be managed by third parties. At 31 December 2020, HSBC’s
post-employment benefit plans had placed deposits of $452m (2019: $530m) with its banking subsidiaries, earning interest payable to
the schemes of nil (2019: $0.3m). The above outstanding balances arose from the ordinary course of business and on substantially the
same terms, including interest rates and security, as for comparable transactions with third-party counterparties.
The combined HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme enters into swap transactions with HSBC to manage inflation and interest rate
sensitivity of its liabilities and selected assets. At 31 December 2020, the gross notional value of the swaps was $7.7bn (2019: $9.9bn);
these swaps had a positive fair value to the scheme of $1.0bn (2019: $1.2bn); and HSBC had delivered collateral of $1.0bn (2019:
$1.2bn) to the scheme in respect of these arrangements. All swaps were executed at prevailing market rates and within standard market
bid/offer spreads.
HSBC Holdings
Details of HSBC Holdings’ subsidiaries are shown in Note 37.
The above outstanding balances arose in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms, including interest rates
and security, as for comparable transactions with third-party counterparties.
Some employees of HSBC Holdings are members of the HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme, which is sponsored by a separate Group
company. HSBC Holdings incurs a charge for these employees equal to the contributions paid into the scheme on their behalf.
Disclosure in relation to the scheme is made in Note 5.
In accordance with section 409 of the Companies Act 2006 a list of HSBC Holdings plc subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates, the
registered office addresses and the effective percentages of equity owned at 31 December 2020 are disclosed below.
Unless otherwise stated, the share capital comprises ordinary or common shares that are held by Group subsidiaries. The ownership
percentage is provided for each undertaking. The undertakings below are consolidated by HSBC unless otherwise indicated.
452 TALF Plus ABS Opportunities SPV LLC 100.00 13 Griffin International Limited 100.00 16
Assetfinance December (H) Limited 100.00 16 Guangdong Enping HSBC Rural Bank
Assetfinance December (M) Limited (In Company Limited 100.00 10, 39
Liquidation) 100.00 17 Guangzhou HSBC Real Estate Company Ltd 100.00 40
Assetfinance December (P) Limited 100.00 16 Hang Seng (Nominee) Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37
Assetfinance December (R) Limited 100.00 16 Hang Seng Bank (China) Limited 100.00 (62.14) 41
Assetfinance June (A) Limited 100.00 16 Hang Seng Bank (Trustee) Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37
Assetfinance June (D) Limited 100.00 15 Hang Seng Bank Limited 62.14 37
Assetfinance Limited 100.00 16 Hang Seng Bullion Company Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37
Assetfinance March (B) Limited 100.00 18 Hang Seng Credit Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37
Assetfinance March (D) Limited 100.00 15 Hang Seng Data Services Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37
Assetfinance March (F) Limited 100.00 16 Hang Seng Finance Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37
Assetfinance September (F) Limited 100.00 16 Hang Seng Financial Information Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37
Assetfinance September (G) Limited 100.00 15 Hang Seng Indexes (Netherlands) B.V. 100.00 (62.14) 42
B&Q Financial Services Limited 100.00 16 Hang Seng Indexes Company Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37
Banco HSBC S.A. 100.00 19 Hang Seng Insurance Company Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37
Banco Nominees (Guernsey) Limited 100.00 20 Hang Seng Investment Management Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37
Banco Nominees 2 (Guernsey) Limited 100.00 20 Hang Seng Investment Services Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37
Banco Nominees Limited 100.00 21 Hang Seng Life Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37
Beau Soleil Limited Partnership N/A 0, 22 Hang Seng Real Estate Management Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37
Beijing Miyun HSBC Rural Bank Company Hang Seng Securities Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37
Limited 100.00 10, 23 Hang Seng Security Management Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37
Billingsgate Nominees Limited (In Liquidation) 100.00 24 Haseba Investment Company Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37
Canada Crescent Nominees (UK) Limited 100.00 16 HFC Bank Limited (In Liquidation) 100.00 17
Canada Square Nominees (UK) Limited 100.00 16 High Time Investments Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37
Charterhouse Administrators ( D.T.) Limited 100.00 (99.99) 16 Household Pooling Corporation 100.00 45
Chongqing Rongchang HSBC Rural Bank HSBC (Singapore) Nominees Pte Ltd 100.00 50
Company Limited 100.00 10, 30 HSBC Agency (India) Private Limited 100.00 51
Dempar 1 100.00 (99.99) 4, 34 HSBC Asia Pacific Holdings (UK) Limited 100.00 16
Desarrollo Turistico, S.A. de C.V. (In HSBC Asset Finance (UK) Limited 100.00 16
Liquidation) 100.00 (99.99) 14 HSBC Asset Finance M.O.G. Holdings (UK)
Electronic Data Process México, S.A. de C.V. 100.00 14 Limited 100.00 16
Equator Holdings Limited (In Liquidation) 100.00 17 HSBC Asset Management (India) Private
Eton Corporate Services Limited 100.00 20 Limited 100.00 54
Far East Leasing SA (In Dissolution) 100.00 35 HSBC Assurances Vie (France) 100.00 (99.99) 55
Flandres Contentieux S.A. 100.00 (99.99) 34 HSBC Australia Holdings Pty Limited 100.00 56
Fujian Yongan HSBC Rural Bank Company HSBC Bank (China) Company Limited 100.00 10, 58
Fulcher Enterprises Company Limited 100.00 (62.14) 37 HSBC Bank (Mauritius) Limited 100.00 59
Fundacion HSBC, A.C. 100.00 (99.99) 9, 14 HSBC Bank (RR) (Limited Liability Company) N/A 0, 11, 60
HSBC Bank Argentina S.A. 100.00 53 HSBC Executor & Trustee Company (UK)
HSBC Bank Armenia cjsc 100.00 65 Limited 100.00 15
HSBC Bank Australia Limited 100.00 56 HSBC Factoring (France) 100.00 (99.99) 34
HSBC Bank Capital Funding (Sterling 1) LP N/A 0, 47 HSBC Finance Limited 100.00 16
HSBC Bank Capital Funding (Sterling 2) LP N/A 0, 47 HSBC Finance Mortgages Inc. 100.00 84
HSBC Bank Egypt S.A.E 99.63 (94.54) 67 HSBC Finance Transformation (UK) Limited 100.00 16
HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad 100.00 48 HSBC Financial Services (Lebanon) s.a.l. 99.65 85
HSBC Bank Malta p.l.c. 70.03 68 HSBC Financial Services (Middle East) Limited
HSBC Bank Middle East Limited 100.00 5, 69
(In Liquidation) 100.00 86
HSBC Bank Middle East Limited HSBC Financial Services (Uruguay) S.A. (In
Representative Office Morocco SARL (In Liquidation) 100.00 87
Liquidation) 100.00 70
HSBC FinTech Services (Shanghai) Company
HSBC Bank Oman S.A.O.G. 51.00 71 Limited 100.00 88
HSBC Bank Pension Trust (UK) Limited 100.00 16 HSBC Germany Holdings GmbH 100.00 38
HSBC Bank plc 100.00 16
HSBC Global Asset Management (Bermuda)
HSBC Bank USA, National Association 100.00 3, 72 Limited 100.00 3, 21
HSBC Branch Nominee (UK) Limited 100.00 15 HSBC Global Asset Management (Canada)
HSBC Brasil Holding S.A. 100.00 19 Limited 100.00 66
HSBC Broking Forex (Asia) Limited 100.00 44 HSBC Global Asset Management
(Deutschland) GmbH 100.00 (99.33) 38
HSBC Broking Futures (Asia) Limited 100.00 44
HSBC Global Asset Management (France) 100.00 (99.99) 55
HSBC Broking Futures (Hong Kong) Limited 100.00 44
HSBC Global Asset Management (Hong Kong)
HSBC Broking Securities (Asia) Limited 100.00 44 Limited 100.00 22
HSBC Broking Securities (Hong Kong) Limited 100.00 44
HSBC Global Asset Management
HSBC Broking Services (Asia) Limited 100.00 44 (International) Limited (In Liquidation) 100.00 89
HSBC Canadian Covered Bond (Legislative) HSBC Global Asset Management (Japan) K. K. 100.00 90
Guarantor Limited Partnership N/A 0, 73
HSBC Global Asset Management (Malta)
HSBC Capital (USA), Inc. 100.00 13
Limited 100.00 (70.03) 91
HSBC Capital Funding (Dollar 1) L.P. N/A 0, 47
HSBC Global Asset Management (México),
HSBC Capital Limited 100.00 44 S.A. de C.V., Sociedad Operadora de Fondos
HSBC Card Services Inc. 100.00 13
de Inversión, Grupo Financiero HSBC 100.00 (99.99) 14
HSBC Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V., Grupo HSBC Global Asset Management (Oesterreich)
Financiero HSBC 100.00 (99.99) 14
GmbH 100.00 (99.33) 6, 92
HSBC City Funding Holdings 100.00 16 HSBC Global Asset Management (Switzerland)
AG 100.00 (99.66) 4, 93
HSBC Client Holdings Nominee (UK) Limited 100.00 16
HSBC Client Nominee (Jersey) Limited 100.00 75 HSBC Global Asset Management (Taiwan)
Limited 100.00 94
HSBC Columbia Funding, LLC N/A 0, 13
HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited 100.00 16
HSBC Continental Europe 99.99 34
HSBC Corporate Finance (Hong Kong) Limited 100.00 44 HSBC Global Asset Management Argentina
S.A. Sociedad Gerente de Fondos Comunes de
HSBC Corporate Trustee Company (UK) Inversión 100.00 (99.99) 96
Limited 100.00 16
HSBC Global Asset Management Holdings
HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited 100.00 56 (Bahamas) Limited 100.00 97
HSBC Custody Services (Guernsey) Limited 100.00 20 HSBC Global Asset Management Limited 100.00 2, 16
HSBC Daisy Investments (Mauritius) Limited 100.00 76 HSBC Global Custody Nominee (UK) Limited 100.00 16
HSBC Diversified Loan Fund General Partner HSBC Global Custody Proprietary Nominee
Sarl 100.00 77 (UK) Limited 100.00 1, 16
HSBC Electronic Data Processing (Guangdong) HSBC Global Services (Canada) Limited 100.00 98
Limited 100.00 10, 78 HSBC Global Services (China) Holdings Limited 100.00 16
HSBC Electronic Data Processing (Malaysia) HSBC Global Services (Hong Kong) Limited 100.00 44
Sdn Bhd 100.00 79 HSBC Global Services (UK) Limited 100.00 16
HSBC Electronic Data Processing (Philippines), HSBC Global Services Limited 100.00 2, 16
Inc. 99.99 80
HSBC Global Shared Services (India) Private
HSBC Electronic Data Processing India Private Limited (In Liquidation) 99.99 1, 51
Limited 100.00 81 HSBC Group Management Services Limited 100.00 16
HSBC Electronic Data Processing Lanka HSBC Group Nominees UK Limited 100.00 2, 16
(Private) Limited 100.00 82
HSBC Holdings B.V. 100.00 16
HSBC Electronic Data Service Delivery (Egypt) HSBC IM Pension Trust Limited 100.00 16
S.A.E. 100.00 83
HSBC Infrastructure Debt GP 1 S.à r.l. N/A 0, 52
HSBC Enterprise Investment Company (UK) HSBC Infrastructure Debt GP 2 S.à r.l. N/A 0, 52
Limited (In Liquidation) 100.00 17
HSBC Infrastructure Limited 100.00 16
HSBC Epargne Entreprise (France) 100.00 (99.99) 55
HSBC INKA Investment-AG TGV 100.00 (99.33) 12, 99
HSBC Equator (UK) Limited (In Liquidation) 100.00 17
HSBC Inmobiliaria (Mexico), S.A. de C.V. 100.00 (99.99) 14
HSBC Equipment Finance (UK) Limited 100.00 15
HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Asia) Limited 100.00 44
HSBC Equity (UK) Limited 100.00 16
HSBC International Trustee Limited 100.00 HSBC Private Banking Holdings (Suisse) SA 100.00 120
106
HSBC Private Banking Nominee 3 (Jersey)
HSBC Inversiones S.A. 99.99 57
Limited 100.00 124
HSBC InvestDirect (India) Limited 100.00 (99.98) 107 HSBC Private Equity Investments (UK) Limited 100.00 16
HSBC InvestDirect Financial Services (India) HSBC Private Trustee (Hong Kong) Limited 100.00 44
Limited 99.99 (99.98) 107
HSBC Private Wealth Services (Canada) Inc. 100.00 109
HSBC InvestDirect Sales & Marketing (India)
Limited 98.99 (98.98) 51
HSBC Professional Services (India) Private
Limited 100.00 125
HSBC InvestDirect Securities (India) Private
Limited 99.99 107 HSBC Property (UK) Limited 100.00 16
HSBC Invoice Finance (UK) Limited 100.00 110 HSBC Retirement Services Limited 100.00 1, 16
HSBC Issuer Services Common Depositary HSBC Savings Bank (Philippines) Inc. 99.99 127
Nominee (UK) Limited 100.00 16 HSBC Securities (Asia) Limited (In Liquidation) 100.00 44
HSBC Issuer Services Depositary Nominee
HSBC Securities (Canada) Inc. 100.00 98
(UK) Limited 100.00 16
HSBC Securities (Egypt) S.A.E. 100.00 (94.65) 67
HSBC Latin America B.V. 100.00 16
HSBC Securities (Japan) Limited 100.00 16
HSBC Latin America Holdings (UK) Limited 100.00 2, 16
HSBC Securities (Singapore) Pte Limited 100.00 50
HSBC Leasing (Asia) Limited 100.00 44
HSBC Securities (South Africa) (Pty) Limited 100.00 128
HSBC Leasing (France) 100.00 (99.99) 34
HSBC Securities (Taiwan) Corporation Limited 100.00 129
HSBC Life (Cornell Centre) Limited 100.00 100
HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. 100.00 13
HSBC Life (Edwick Centre) Limited 100.00 100
Financial statements
HSBC Services USA Inc. 100.00 133 Lion International Management Limited 100.00 106
HSBC Servicios Financieros, S.A. de C.V 100.00 (99.99) 14 Lion Management (Hong Kong) Limited 100.00 1, 44
Bankbeteiligungen mbH 100.00 (99.33) 38 Real Estate Collateral Management Company 100.00 13
HSBC Trinkaus Immobilien Beteiligungs KG 100.00 (99.33) 38 RLUKREF Nominees (UK) Two Limited 100.00 1, 16
HSBC Trinkaus Real Estate GmbH 100.00 (99.33) 6, 38 S.A.P.C. - Ufipro Recouvrement 99.99 34
HSBC Trust Company (UK) Limited 100.00 16 Saf Zhu Jiang Shi Er 100.00 (99.99) 4, 34
HSBC Trust Company AG (In Liquidation) 100.00 31 Saf Zhu Jiang Shi Jiu 100.00 (99.99) 4, 34
HSBC Trustee (C.I.) Limited 100.00 Saf Zhu Jiang Shi Liu 100.00 (99.99) 4, 34
124
Saf Zhu Jiang Shi Qi 100.00 (99.99) 4, 34
HSBC Trustee (Cayman) Limited 100.00 138
Saf Zhu Jiang Shi Wu 100.00 (99.99) 4, 34
HSBC Trustee (Guernsey) Limited 100.00 20
SCI HSBC Assurances Immo 100.00 (99.99) 55
HSBC Trustee (Hong Kong) Limited 100.00 44 Serai Limited 100.00 1, 44
HSBC Trustee (Singapore) Limited 100.00 50 Serai Technology Development (Shanghai)
HSBC UK Bank plc 100.00 Limited 100.00 10, 147
15
HSBC Violet Investments (Mauritius) Limited 100.00 76 Sico Limited 100.00 150
HSBC Wealth Client Nominee Limited 100.00 1, 15 SNC Dorique 99.99 1, 9, 151
HSBC Yatirim Menkul Degerler A.S. 100.00 122 SNC Les Mercuriales 100.00 (99.99) 1, 9, 34
HSI Asset Securitization Corporation 100.00 13 SNC Les Oliviers D'Antibes 60.00 55
Inmobiliaria Grufin, S.A. de C.V. 100.00 (99.99) 14 The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking
Corporation Limited 100.00 44
Inmobiliaria Guatusi, S.A. de C.V. 100.00 (99.99) 14
John Lewis Financial Services Limited 100.00 16 Trinkaus Australien Immobilien Fonds Nr. 1
Brisbane GmbH & Co. KG 100.00 (99.33) 38
Keyser Ullmann Limited 100.00 (99.99) 16
Trinkaus Australien Immobilien-Fonds Nr. 1
Lion Corporate Services Limited 100.00 44
Treuhand-GmbH 100.00 (99.33) 6, 38
Lion International Corporate Services Limited 100.00 1, 106
The undertakings below are joint ventures and equity accounted. Hang Seng Qianhai Fund Management 43.49
Company Limited 1, 10, 173
% of share class HCM Holdings Limited (In Liquidation) 50.99 17
held by immediate
parent company (or HSBC Canadian Covered Bond (Legislative) GP
by the Group where Inc. 100.00 73
Joint ventures this varies) Footnotes HSBC Jintrust Fund Management Company
CCF & Partners Asset Management Limited 100.00 (99.99) 16 Limited 49.00 174
Global Payments Technology Mexico S.A. De HSBC Saudi Arabia, a Saudi closed Joint Stock
C.V. 50.00 14 Company 66.18 175
House Network Sdn Bhd 25.00 155 Icon Brickell LLC (In Liquidation) N/A 0, 176
HSBC Life Insurance Company Limited 50.00 156 Jeppe Star Limited 33.99 177
HSBC Pollination Climate Asset Management Liquidity Match LLC N/A 0, 188
Limited 40.00 157 London Precious Metals Clearing Limited 30.00 189
ProServe Bermuda Limited 50.00 158 MENA Infrastructure Fund (GP) Ltd 33.33 178
The London Silver Market Fixing Limited N/A 0, 1, 159 Novo Star Limited 33.99 179
Vaultex UK Limited 50.00 160 Quantexa Ltd 10.99 146
Kowloon, Hong Kong 138 P.O. Box 309 Ugland House, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands,
101 Level 32, HSBC Main Building 1 Queen's Road Central, Hong KY1-1104
Kong SAR, Hong Kong 139 No. 56 Yu Rong Street, Macheng, China, 438300
102 7/F HSBC Centre 3058 Fifth Ave West, Bonifacio Global City, 140 No. 205 Lie Shan Road Suizhou, Hubei, China
Taguig City, Philippines
141 Building 3, Yin Zuo Di Jing Wan Tianmen New City, Tianmen,
103 HSBC Building Minet El Hosn, Riad el Solh, Beirut 1107-2080,
Hubei Province, China
Lebanon, P.O. Box 11-1380
142 RM101, 102 & 106 Sunshine Fairview, Sunshine Garden,
104 300 Delaware Avenue Suite 1401, Wilmington, Delaware,
Pedestrian Walkway, Pingjiang, China
United States Of America, 19801
143 Kings Meadow Chester Business Park, Chester, United
105 Woodbourne Hall, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands,
Kingdom, CH99 9FB
P.O. Box 916
144 World Trade Center 1, Floor 8-9 Jalan Jenderal Sudirman
106 Craigmuir Chambers, PO Box 71, Road Town, Tortola, British
Kavling 29 - 31, Jakarta, Indonesia, 12920
Virgin Islands
145 5th Floor, World Trade Center 1, Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav.
107 9-11 Floors, NESCO IT Park Building No. 3 Western Express
29-31, Jakarta, Indonesia, 12920
Highway, Goregaon (East), Mumbai, India, 400063
146 75 Park Lane, Croydon, Surrey, United Kingdom, CR9 1XS
108 3, Aboul Feda Street Zamalek, Cairo, Egypt
147 Unit B02 20/F No. 168 Yin Cheng Zhong Road, Pilot Free Trade
109 300-885 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia,
Zone, Shanghai, China, 200120
Canada, V6C 3E9
148 No.198-2 Chengshan Avenue (E), Rongcheng, China, 264300
110 21 Farncombe Road Worthing, United Kingdom, BN11 2BW