100% found this document useful (2 votes)
228 views35 pages

Consequence Modeling and PSM

Uploaded by

Tom Tao
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
228 views35 pages

Consequence Modeling and PSM

Uploaded by

Tom Tao
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 35

Consequence Modeling

and PSM

Wilbert Lee
Senior Staff Process Risk Engineer
Chevron Energy Technology Company

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved.


Consequence Modeling

The use of models to assess the potential for


injury to persons and damage to buildings and
equipment that could result from a Loss of
Containment.

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 2


Potential Hazards from Loss of
Containment

 Explosions
 Fire
 Flammable Cloud
 Toxic Cloud

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 3


Potential Hazards from Loss of
Containment
 Explosions
 Vapor Cloud Explosion
 Pressure Vessel Burst
 Dust
 Confined Explosion
 Chemical

 Fire
 Jet Fire
 Pool Fire
 Flash Fire
 Flares
 BLEVE , (Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion)
© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 4
Potential Hazards from Loss of
Containment

 Toxic Release
 Hydrogen Sulfide

 Ammonia

 Chlorine

 Combustion Byproducts

 Particulate Matter

 Air Quality – SOx, NOx

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 5


Consequence Models & Methodology
 Equations and calculations

 Graphical

 Computer Programs
 Excel Based

 Integrated Program, with Subroutines

 Single Hazard Program

 Dispersion
 Accidental Release

 Air Quality, (Gaussian)

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 6


Use & Purpose of Consequence Modeling
 Project Design
 Risk management and reduction

 Plant Layout:

 Vents and PSV’s

 Flares

 Building Siting

 Risk Assessments
 Qualitative

 Quantitative, (QRA’s)

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 7


Use & Purpose of Consequence Modeling
 Regulatory:
 EPA Risk Management Plan, (RMP)

 OSHA PSM – Facility Siting

 UK, Europe, & Australia Safety Case

 Inherently Safer Design


 Emergency Response Procedures
 Operating Procedures
 Maintenance Procedures
 Company Policy

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 8


Use & Purpose of Consequence Modeling:
Facility Siting Assessments
 API RP-752 & RP-753, (Permanent & Portable
Buildings)
 Refineries, Gas Plants, and Chemical Plants

 Methodology for managing potential risks to


personnel in occupied buildings that could result
from releases in process units

 Possible Hazards Include:

 Explosion

 Fire

 Toxic Releases

 Consequence or Risk Based Analysis


© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 9
Potential Sources of Releases

Rupture, puncture, leak or hole in:

 Pressure Vessels

 Equipment:
 Pipes

 Pumps

 Compressors

 Flares, Vents, PSVs

 Valves, Gaskets, Seals, Flanges, Bleeders

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 10


Potential Sources of Releases
 Transportation Vehicles:
 Trucks

 Railcars

 Ships

 Pipelines:
 Above ground

 Below ground

 Subsea

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 11


Model Capabilities & Considerations

 Thermodynamics
 Multi-Component

 Release Rate

 Aerosol Effects

 Weather Conditions

 Pool Evaporation

 Surface Roughness

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 12


Model Capabilities & Considerations

 Possible Hazards:
 Explosion

 Fire

 Dispersion – Toxics & Flammables

 Flares: Radiant Heat

 Model Validation

 Accidental versus Air Quality Model

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 13


Explosion Modeling: Factors

 Energy Term

 Congestion

 Confinement

 Fuel Reactivity

 Ignition Strength

 Shielding and Channeling Effects

 Venting of Overpressure Buildup

 Deflagration versus Detonation

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 14


Explosion Models
 Baker Strehlow

 TNO Multi-Energy

 TNT

 CAM

 SCOPE

 Computation Fluid Dynamics, (CFD)


 FLACS

 EXSIM

 AutoReaGas
(Note: Some models are proprietary)

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 15


Dispersion Models
 Accidental Releases:
 Canary, (Quest Consultants)
 PHAST, (DNV)
 SAFER TRACE, (SAFER Systems)

 Air Quality:
 AERMOD
 Screen3
 ISCST3
 Many Others

 First Responders:
 ALOHA
 CAMEO
© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 16
Endpoint or Concentration Criteria
 Flammable Gas Dispersion
 Lower Flammable Limit, (LFL)

 Upper Flammable Limit, (UFL)

Substance LFL UFL


Methane 5% 15%
Propane 2.1% 9.5%
Hydrogen 4% 75%

 Criteria to Keep From Potential Ignition Sources:


 20-50% LFL

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 17


Toxic Endpoint Criteria

 ERPG: Emergency Response Planning


Guidelines
 ERPG-1, 2, 3: (1) Hour Exposure

 Minor Health Effects, (max)


 Serious Health Effects, (max limit, without
experiencing)
 Life-Threatening Effects, (max limit, without
experiencing)

 AEGL: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels


 AEGL 1, 2, 3
 (10) min to (8) hr Exposure Duration
 Similar to ERPG Health Effects Definitions

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 18


Toxic Endpoint Criteria

 IDLH: Immediate Dangerous Limit or Health

 TLV & STEL: Worker Exposure


 Threshold Limit Value, Short-Term Exposure Limit

 8 hour and 15 min

 Dosage & Probits


 Exposure Time & Concentration

 Potential Fatality rates

 Can be used in QRA’s

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 19


Hydrogen Sulfide Endpoint Criteria, (ppm)
 ERPG-1: 0.1ppm
 ERPG-2: 30 ppm
 ERPG-3: 100 ppm

 AEGL-1: 0.51ppm, (1 hour)


 AEGL-2: 27 , (1 hour)
 AEGL-3: 50 , (1 hour)

 IDLH:100 ppm
 TLV:1 ppm
 STEL:5 ppm
 1% Fatality for (1) Hour Exposure:160 ppm*
* - Perry and Articola – CCPS 1980

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 20


Radiant Heat Endpoint Criteria

 Jet, Pool Fires, & Flares

 API 521 Flare Design Criteria: (max)


 500 Btu/hr-ft2: Continuous exposure for personnel

 1500 Btu/hr-ft2: Personnel Exposure only for several minutes

 2000 Btu/hr-ft2: Personnel Exposure only for 1 minute

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 21


Example of Dispersion
Modeling, (Canary 4.4)

Distance to Distance to
Weather LFL, 20% LFL,
Scenario Conditions (ft) (ft)

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 22


Example of Dispersion
Modeling, (Canary 4.4)

Distance to Distance to
Weather LFL, 20% LFL,
Scenario Conditions (ft) (ft)

Sunny Day
1/2” Hole, Methane at 50 psig 10 mph wind 3 7

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 23


Example of Dispersion
Modeling, (Canary 4.4)

Distance to Distance to
Weather LFL, 20% LFL,
Scenario Conditions (ft) (ft)

Sunny Day
1/2” Hole, Methane at 50 psig 10 mph wind 3 7

1/2” Hole, Methane at 200 Sunny Day


psig 10 mph wind 5.6 13

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 24


Example of Dispersion
Modeling, (Canary 4.4)

Distance to Distance to
Weather LFL, 20% LFL,
Scenario Conditions (ft) (ft)

Sunny Day
1/2” Hole, Methane at 50 psig 10 mph wind 3 7

Sunny Day
1/2” Hole, Methane at 200 psig 10 mph wind 5.6 13

1/2” Hole, Propane at 200 Sunny Day


psig 10 mph wind 20 130

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 25


Example of Dispersion
Modeling, (Canary 4.4)

Distance to Distance to
Weather LFL, 20% LFL,
Scenario Conditions (ft) (ft)

Sunny Day
1/2” Hole, Methane at 50 psig 10 mph wind 3 7

Sunny Day
1/2” Hole, Methane at 200 psig 10 mph wind 5.6 13

Sunny Day
1/2” Hole, Propane at 200 psig 10 mph wind 20 130

Sunny Day
2” Hole, Propane at 200 psig 10 mph wind 500 1100

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 26


Example of Dispersion
Modeling, (Canary 4.4)

Distance to Distance to
Weather LFL, 20% LFL,
Scenario Conditions (ft) (ft)

Sunny Day
1/2” Hole, Methane at 50 psig 10 mph wind 3 7

Sunny Day
1/2” Hole, Methane at 200 psig 10 mph wind 5.6 13

Sunny Day
1/2” Hole, Propane at 200 psig 10 mph wind 20 130

Sunny Day
2” Hole, Propane at 200 psig 10 mph wind 500 1100

Night
2” Hole, Propane at 200 psig 5 mph wind 900 2000

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 27


Example of Dispersion Model Output

Momentum Jet Cloud


CONCENTRATION CONTOURS: SIDE VIEW
LPG Release
70.0

60.0

50.0

Height (feet) 40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

0.0
0.0
20.0 40.0 60.0
Downwind Distance (feet)
9.50 mole percent Propane
2.10 mole percent Propane
1.05 mole percent Propane

casename=1LPGtst
windspeed = 10.0 mph
D stability
CANARY by Quest Thu Jul 17 14:25:28 2014

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 28


Example of Explosion Model Output

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 29


References for Information

 CCPS: “Guidelines for Consequence Analysis of Chemical


Releases”

 CCPS: “Guidelines for Vapor Cloud Explosions, Pressure


Vessel Burst, BLEVE and Flash Fire Hazards”

 CCPS: “Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk


Analysis”

 API 752: “Management of Hazards Associated with Location


of Process Plant Permanent Buildings”

 API 521: “Guide for Pressure-relieving and Depressuring


Systems”

 Lee’s Loss Prevention in the Process Industry

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 30


CCPS: “Guidelines for Consequence Analysis of
Chemical Releases” - Equations, Graphs & Excel
Spreadsheets

 Liquid Discharge through a Piping System


 Gas Discharge through a Hole
 Pool Evaporation
 Vapor Cloud Explosion Model
 Overpressure from a Ruptured Vessel
 Range of a Fragment in Air

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 31


CCPS: “Guidelines for Consequence Analysis of
Chemical Releases” - Equations, Graphs & Excel
Spreadsheets

 BLEVE Thermal Flux


 BLEVE Blast Fragments
 Overpressure from a Combustion in a Vessel
 Radiation from a Burning Pool
 Radiant Flux from a Jet Fire
 Thermal Flux Dosage Fatality Estimate

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 32


Use of Consequence Modeling in PSM:
Summary

 Identify Potential Hazards:


 PHA’s

 Review of plant & drawings

 Estimate Potential Impact & Hazard


 Understand why modeling is needed
 Use to improve/determine design basis
 Mitigation Options
 Procedures and Emergency Response

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 33


Use of Consequence Modeling in PSM:
Other Issues

 Know what models and methods are available


 Understand limits & boundaries of models
 Understand accuracy and sensitivities of model
 Understand what data is needed to run analysis
 Determine most appropriate model to use
 Understand that models only provide estimates

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 34


Questions ?

© 2014 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. 35

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy