The document discusses two cases related to inheritance and succession. In the first case, nieces and nephews have legal capacity to sue as intestate heirs. In the second case, the plaintiff was found not to be a legal heir since she was a grandniece, so the extrajudicial partition agreement was void with respect to her.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views1 page
Wills Notes - Part10
The document discusses two cases related to inheritance and succession. In the first case, nieces and nephews have legal capacity to sue as intestate heirs. In the second case, the plaintiff was found not to be a legal heir since she was a grandniece, so the extrajudicial partition agreement was void with respect to her.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
Madarcos v de la Merced, 174 SCRA 599: ART. 972.
The right of representation
SIR: If the nieces and nephews has legal takes place in the direct descending capacity to sue? line, but never in the ascending. Q: who are legal heirs under the Public Land In the collateral line, it takes place only in Act sec. 119? favor of the children of brothers or sisters, A: Apply the rule under civil code. Here the whether they be of the full or half blood. decedent died without a will, so intestate Much less could plaintiff-appellee inherit in succession will apply. her own right. So, here being intestate heirs, they have ART. 962. In every inheritance, the capacity to sue. relative nearest in degree excludes the more distant ones, saving the right of De los Santos v de la Cruz, 37 SCRA 555: representation when it properly takes On May 21, 1965, Gertrudes de los Santos place. ... . filed a complaint for specific performance against Maximo de la Cruz. In the present case, the relatives "nearest in degree" to Pelagia de la Cruz are her nephews Gertrudes de los Santos claimed, among and nieces, one of whom is defendant- others, that on August 24, 1963, she and appellant. Necessarily, plaintiff-appellee, a several co-heirs, including the defendant, grandniece is excluded by law from the executed an extrajudicial partition agreement inheritance. over a certain portion of land with an area of around 20,000 sq. m.; that the parties thereto But what is the legal effect of plaintiff- had agreed to adjudicate three lots to the appellee's inclusion and participation in the defendant; that in spite of demands by the extrajudicial partition agreement insofar as plaintiff, by the co-heirs, and by the residents her right to bring the present action is of the subdivision, the defendant refused to concerned? They did not confer upon her the perform his aforesaid obligation although he right to institute this action. The express had already sold the aforesaid lots. purpose of the extrajudicial partition agreement, as admitted by the parties in the The defendant admitted the due execution of stipulation of facts, was to divide the estate the extrajudicial partition agreement, but set among the heirs of Pelagia de la Cruz. up the affirmative defenses that the plaintiff had no cause of action against him because It is quite apparent that in executing the the said agreement was void with respect to partition agreement, the parties thereto were her, for the reason that the plaintiff was not laboring under the erroneous belief that an heir of Pelagia de la Cruz, deceased owner plaintiff-appellee was one of the legal heirs of of the property. Pelagia de la Cruz. Plaintiff-appellee not being such a heir, the partition is void with ISSUE: Whether Gertrudes Delos Santos is respect to her, pursuant to Article 1105 of the an heir of the decedent. Civil Code, which reads: ART. 1105. A partition which RULING: includes a person believed to be an No. Plaintiff-appellee being a mere heir, but who is not, shall be void only grandniece of Pelagia de la Cruz, she could with respect to such person. not inherit from the latter by right of representation.