Scribd
Upload
680 views1 page

IHRERC Research Proposal Content Checklist

This document is a checklist for researchers at Haramaya University to ensure their research proposals address key components in the proper order when submitting for institutional review. The checklist outlines 12 sections that must be included in the proposal, such as the title, abstract, introduction, literature review, methodology, work plan, and budget. Researchers must check each box to confirm inclusion of the section and get approval signatures. Proposals missing required components will not be accepted for review.

Uploaded by

Kumera Dinkisa Tolera
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
680 views1 page

IHRERC Research Proposal Content Checklist

This document is a checklist for researchers at Haramaya University to ensure their research proposals address key components in the proper order when submitting for institutional review. The checklist outlines 12 sections that must be included in the proposal, such as the title, abstract, introduction, literature review, methodology, work plan, and budget. Researchers must check each box to confirm inclusion of the section and get approval signatures. Proposals missing required components will not be accepted for review.

Uploaded by

Kumera Dinkisa Tolera
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Haramaya University, College of Health and Medical Sciences, IHRERC

Declaration of the Principal Investigator requesting for Institutional Health Research Ethics Review by the
IHRERC that the following contents are addressed in the proposal document in the same order as this check list

Please check that the following contents are all addressed (in the same order as indicated) in the research proposal document by putting an
“√” mark on each box. If an item in the contents is not addressed or not indicated in its proper sequence, it should be marked with “X” and
given a remark of justification for its omission. This checklist should be counter signed by the Major adviser if the applicant is a student of
the SGS.

NB: 1. If these contents are not observed in the document submitted, the proposal will not be accepted by the IHRERC for review and
approval.

Name of Principal Investigator: _______________________________________Signature:________________ Date: ______________________

Name & signature of major advisor (for SGS students only): Name: ________________________________ Sig. _____________ Date: _______

Title of the research proposal:


_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1. Title page: Clear title of the research and full description of the Principal Investigator(s) and if available the Co-investigator(s).
2. Acknowledgment(s)
3. List of contents including list of tables and figures if available
4. List of acronyms/ or abbreviations if available
5. Abstract (that includes: Background, Objective, Methods, Expected outcome, Proposed budget and Key words)
6. Introduction (with background, statement of the problem, significance of the study and objectives (general and specific) having
their own sub titles. The statement of the problem must show what gap/ what new is to be addressed (justification/rationale of
the study) and the significance should indicate who (body, office or organization at local level primarily) will be using/ benefiting
primarily from the findings of this research)
7. Literature review: Showing current knowledge and findings about the study title (including conceptual framework)
8. Methodology: Should include the following as sub-topics:
 Study area/setting and study period
 Study design (explicitly described)
 Source population
 Study population
 Inclusion and exclusion criteria (separate on their own sub-titles)
 Sample size determination
 Sampling procedure/technique
 Data collection methods (data collection instruments, data collectors, procedure of data collection…)
 Variables (dependent, independent)
 Operational definition(s)
 Data quality control
 Methods of data analysis
 Ethical considerations
 Expected outcome
 Information dissemination
 Limitations of the study (if perceived)
9. Work plan
10. Budget break down
11. List of references
12. Annexes:
 Participant information sheet and voluntary consent form(s) as applicable to the different respondents (using the
template from the office of the IHRERC and its translations to local languages, if necessary)
 Data collection instruments (properly translated to local languages wherever necessary)
 Curriculum vitae (CV) of the PI(s) and Co-investigator(s)
 Signature of advisors (if the PI is a student)
 Technical approval from Department Research Committees (as applicable)
 Filled format of application for ethical review

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy