Case Study On Contract Farming: It Takes Three To Tango: Pepsico, Basix, and Farmers in Jharkhand
Case Study On Contract Farming: It Takes Three To Tango: Pepsico, Basix, and Farmers in Jharkhand
The Holding Company of the BASIX Group, headquartered in Hyderabad, India, was
called Bhartiya Samruddhi Investments and Consulting Services (BASICS) Ltd. By 2006,
BASIX was working with over 90% rural poor households and about 10% urban slum
dwellers in 12 states across 205 districts. BASIX’s mission was to promote a large
number of sustainable livelihoods, for the rural poor and women, by providing financial
services and technical assistance in an integrated manner.
BASIX had a strong presence in Jharkhand, where marginal farmers were struggling to
make ends meet. As per the agreement, PepsiCo was to supply seeds and get an assured
supply of chip-grade quality potatoes. BASIX was to provide microfinance to the farmers
and render training and consultancy for package of practices (POP) as well as check the
background of the farmer, land ownership details, soil quality, etc. Farmers were to get
assured buyback of the produce and also an opportunity to learn modern farming
practices, as per PepsiCo’s guidelines.
But first, the farmers had to be convinced! This job was undertaken by the BASIX team.
BASIX made significant efforts to explain the dynamics of the contract to the farmers.
Even though the marginal farmers in the poverty-ridden state of Jharkhand struggled to
make ends meet, it was difficult to convince them because the seeds were more
expensive, the farming technique was unfamiliar and the result was also pure conjecture.
Not many liked to risk their annual crop.
Since potato was a perishable crop, the idea of getting an assured buyback at a reasonable
fixed price of $0.14/kg (usually market price fluctuated from $0.08 to $0.20/kg,
depending on the time of the year) was tempting. Notwithstanding farmer concerns in
relation to the cost and technique, 70 farmers with a total acreage of 83 acres agreed to
take the chance because they had faith in BASIX. Once the farmers agreed to participate,
BASIX provided microfinance to them to buy seeds and other material for contract
farming and also offered, at minimal charges, training modules and consulting to help
upgrade their skills. It paid 75% of the seed cost to PepsiCo, received the potato tubers
and in turn delivered it to the farmer. The BASIX team, along with the PepsiCo team,
guided these farmers on farming practices, which resonated well with the objective of
livelihood promotion. The resultant crop, whose quality was more or less as desired by
PepsiCo, was inspected and collected from the farmer’s doorstep by PepsiCo officials.
BASIX transported this crop to PepsiCo’s warehouse in Kolkata, West Bengal. Within 15
days the payment arrived in BASIX’s account from which the dues, including service
charges, were deducted and the balance handed over to the farmers.
Performance at a Glance
At the end of the first year (May 2006), the acreage, along with the number of farmers
ready to adopt contract farming for BASIX, increased astronomically. BASIX’s loan
portfolio had significantly improved and the newly formed Growers’ Association decided
to sign a fresh contract. Both PepsiCo and BASIX enhanced support. Thus, the
collaboration proved to be a success in the first year.
However, the second year results were not as encouraging. In the early part of the second
season, the heavy rains in the state washed away a large part of the planted seeds and
demand for more seeds grew, which PepsiCo was unable to provide in time. The farmers
hounded the BASIX staff, who in turn demanded timely supply of seed from PepsiCo.
Considering the crop was seasonal, delay in re-sowing the seeds would slow the maturing
and could result in no growth at all. To add to the woes, expansion in the acreage under
cultivation required increased supply of other essentials as well. These issues caused high
levels of anxiety amongst all the stakeholders down the entire supply chain. During this
time, owing to the impact of adverse weather conditions on the crop, the potato prices in
the open market rose to $0.20/kg and farmers were tempted to sell their improved
produce there. BASIX succeeded only partially when it tried to hold the farmers to the
contractual arrangement. Many farmers sold the produce under cover of the night.
PepsiCo reacted sharply and rejected the leftover potato produce for the farmers and
BASIX to deal with. Thus, the returns were less than expected.
TheDilemma
Meanwhile, the close of the second season raised several concerns for all the
stakeholders. Sahana was aware that in the upcoming project review meeting,
Ramachandran was most likely to inquire about the returns and plans of the project,
whereas Das would need an update on quality and quantity assurance. During their call,
Sahana and Ranjan would, thus, have to deliberate upon the following pressing issues:
What should they recommend to PepsiCo, especially with regard to not having taken into
consideration the occurrence of extraneous variables such as natural calamities? More
importantly, was the PepsiCo-BASIX partnership a win-win for all?