A Case Study Ambo
A Case Study Ambo
Abstract: This research focuses on minimization of defects which causes for product packaging quality of control failure in AMWSC.
The purpose of this research is to increase the quality and productivity improvement in the company by minimizing reworks that usually
occur in the company product packaging process. Due to this qualitative method has been conducted to provide insights and
understanding about the problems. Regarding to this important data was collected from PET production packaging line. In this process
the identification of defects which causes failures for quality control product packaging has been conducted. Then, it was analyzed
using Pareto Analysis and Ishikawa diagram. As the analysis made for 80/20 rule the production quality of PET on packaging section
mostly affected defects by filler centering bell problem 11.3%, Labeler sensor fault 9.95%, Air filler leakage 8.4%, Air conveyor problem
7.79%, syrup ratio problem 7.34%, filler under fill and leakage 7.02%. Then, the root causes of PET product packaging process
categorized by cause and effect diagram. Generally, based on the application of Pareto chart and Ishikawa diagram analysis the paper
suggests how to handle these issues and minimize reworks or bring down defects rate.
2.1 Study Area Product packaging has an important role to the producer in
order to give consumer satisfaction and convenience.
The study area selected for the case study of research is Therefore, quality control of packaging process becomes
Ambo Mineral Water Share Company (AMWSC). It was curtail to the producer. Packaging is the science, art and
located at Sankale, near to Ambo town, 130 km to the west in technology of enclosing or protecting products for
Oromia region, Ethiopia. This area is comfortable for distribution, storage, sale, and use. Packaging also refers to
receiving and shipping of the raw material and products of the the process of designing, evaluating, and producing packages.
company. The environment is good condition for living.
The production process packaging system diagram of
2.2 Data sources, Collection and Analysis AMWSC for RGB and PET production line is not the same.
Because both of them achieve their product qualities have
The data required for the case study have been found from their own paths. RGB process packaging system starts from
Ambo Mineral Water Share Company. The company has two loading, unpacker, bottle washer, filler, labeler, date coder,
major production lines with six different products. packer and unloader whereas PET process packaging system
starts from preform, blow mold, PET filler, labeler, dryer,
The data collected through probable interviews and gathering date coder, shrink wrapper, stretching wrapper, palletizer and
of in-house documentary evidence. A combination technique unloader. Generally, the flow diagram of the RGB and PET
for data collection has been employed in the research. This packaging system summarized as follows respectively.
comprises with literature review, actual photo taken from the
area and interviewed key persons in the company like the
respective professionals. The information collected from the
personal interviews through oral questionnaires.
2.5.1 Actual Downtime: It may be due to technical failure, 2.6.3 Packaging Quality section: The present study has been
machine adjustment, maintenance, or non-availability of focused on Packaging quality section because it is essential
inputs such as materials, labor, power. and critical for the productions of the plant, where many
defects found in this section. Therefore, to analyze the quality
2.5.2 Shutdown loss: The loss incurred by deliberately product, it needs to focus on the packaging process of
shutting down the equipment within the production plan. It production line of PET products. Packaging quality section is
also Period during which an equipment, machine, or plant is a coordinated system of preparing goods for transport,
out of service. warehousing, logistics, sale, and end use. Therefore, after
product packaging finished we must have to full fill the
2.5.3 Down time loss: It is unplanned stop that is five Closure and Corky fit, Labeling should be okay and Data
minutes or longer. There are two general causes of downtime: coder must be visible
(a) Planned downtime: It is scheduled when upgrades and Based on the identification and interview with the packaging
routine maintenance of hardware and software requires. quality section manager of AMWSC, the packaging standard
demanded by the customers can be Packaging is not dirty,
(b)Unplanned downtime: It is something when unexpected Packaging is not leak, Lide is not defect and Carton box is not
crash happens to the systems. leak
Therefore, Packaging is one of the steps of the planning,
2.5.4 Performance Loss: It accounts for time where creating, manufacturing, wrapping, boxing, or bottling of
machinery runs slower than the Ideal cycle time. goods for consumer in the company. It is the most significant
in bottling industry. Different types of faults or defects arise
2.5.5 Quality Loss: It account for defective parts produced in packaging section which should be reduced to maintain the
during steady state production. This includes scrapped parts required quality of product. Therefore, some types of defects,
as well as parts that can be reworked. number of defects per day and checked products per day of
the two months are recorded to analyze their priorities.
2.6. Quality Control Sections of Ambo Mineral Water
share company
Table 1: Recorded Type of Defects and Amount of product defected in Packaging process of PET products of AMWSC for
the past two months (July to August 2018)
No of Defected
Date Types of defects Checked products
products
02/07/2018 Air Compressor Shortage 13 139
05/07/2018 Air conveyor problem 76 139
07/07/2018 PET bottler rinse clamp breakage 45 100
10/07/2018 Filler air leakage 80 8352
11/07/2018 Filler centering bell problem 108 3852
13/07/2018 Syrup Ratio Problem 70 1335
14/07/2018 Blender product tank filter fault 40 1166
16/07/2018 Blow molder short stoppages 15 1077
17/07/2018 Preform conveyor problem 13 1007
18/07/2018 Closure Stuck In Capper Head 17 122
20/07/2018 Stopper Sensor Fault 40 322
21/07/2018 Glue Heating Temperature Getting Low 30 3010
23/07/2018 Labeler Short Stoppage 37 3479
24/07/2018 Labeler Glue Line Cleaning & Adjustment 25 3000
24/07/2017 Glue Drained Outside Of Tank &Adjustment 47 2105
Table 2: General Defect category, their numbers and percentage defectives in the packaging PET products of AMWSC
No. of PET packaging product
Types of Defects Total (%) Cumulative (%)
defects
Filler air leakage 80 8.4 8.4
Syrup ratio problem 70 7.34 15.74
Date coder printing fault 58 6.08 21.82
Speed loss due to lack of pallet 63 6.6 28.42
Filler under fill and leakage 67 7.02 35.44
Labeler sensor fault 95 9.95 45.39
Blow molder short stops 65 6.8 52.19
Shrink wrapper problem 48 5.03 57.22
Syrup pump problem 60 6.29 63.51
Unwritten date coder 37 3.88 67.39
Stopper sensor fault 40 4.2 71.59
Filler centering bell problem 108 11.32 82.91
Bottler rinse clamp breakage 45 4.72 87.63
Blender tank filter fault 42 4.40 92.03
Air problem conveyor 76 7.97 100
TOTAL 954 100 100
2.7. Pareto Analysis Diagram chart where the plotted values are arranged from largest to
smallest. It is used to highlight the most frequently occurring
Quality problems appear in the form of loss (defective items defects, the most common causes of defects, or the most
and their cost). It is extremely important to clarify the frequent causes of customer complaints. Juran (in 1940)
distribution pattern of the loss. Most of the loss will be due to applied Pareto analysis for separating the “vital few” from the
a very few types of defect, and these defects can be attributed “trivial many”. It shows the most frequent reason for rejection
to very smaller number of causes. Thus, if the causes of these of raw materials. He also the first to point out that the Pareto
vital few defects are identified, we can eliminate almost all Principle could be used to quality improvements. In this Case
the losses by concentrating on these particular causes, leaving study to identify the main problems which cause frequent
aside the other trivial many defects for the time being. By defects of PET product packaging process of AMWSC, a two
using the Pareto diagram, can solve this type of problem months’ data has been collected (viz., July and August,
efficiently. It is also considered as one of the seven statistical 2018). The actual rejection (Tables 1 and 2) is grouped in
quality tools applied frequently to break a problem into their respective type of defects.
several parts and identify which parts directly affects the issue
and which parts doesn’t.
2.8 Brainstorming and Ishikawa diagram Figure 3.7: Cause and Effect Diagram (Fishbone diagram)
Potential causes were identified by brainstorming which is
considered to be an effective technique for identifying the 3. Results and Discussion
categories of causes utilizing an informal approach to
problem solving with lateral thinking. Brainstorming is a The products quality at AMWSC has been maintained by
technique used to elicit a large number of ideas from a team implementing quality control activities in three stages which
using its collective power. There are specific steps that are are Control of packaging raw material, Control of packaging
recommended prior to a brainstorming session as to clarify process and Control of product packaging. The case study
the subject of brainstorming session. Moreover, many rules research focused on the causes of defect PET product
should be observed by the participants to ensure that packaging process and on their control (minimization of
participation is not inhibited. These rules are as follows: defects). The cause of defect in packaging process of PET
product activities are categorized in to two, namely General
Do not criticize anyone’s ideas, by word of gesture. problems and Specific problems. General problems related to
raw material, Worker and machinery involved in the
Do not discuss any ideas during the session, except for
production process, while specific problems are related to the
clarification.
production process. Based on the figure 3.7 the fishbone
Do not hesitate to suggest an idea because it sounds “silly”.
diagram made to determine main factors which would be
impact to defect in PET product packaging processes.
Volume 8 Issue 8, August 2020
www.ijser.in
Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
Paper ID: 29082003 DOI: 10.21275/29082003 5 of 7
International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research (IJSER)
ISSN (Online): 2347-3878
Impact Factor (2018): 5.426
According to 80/20 rule of Pareto analysis, in PET product packaging process steps. Application of CED Diagram in
packaging process the defects are found that Filler centering AMWSC creates new chances for achieving a better quality
bell problem ranked as first 11.3%, Labeler sensor fault of products (final and intermediate) and higher production
ranked as second 9.95%, Air filler leakage is ranked as third effectiveness. It can be accomplished by extraction and
8.4%, Air conveyor problem ranked as fourth 7.79%, Syrup visualization of the knowledge hidden in the recorded past
ratio problem ranked as fifth 7.34%, filler under fill and data. However, some best practices to control defect
leakage ranked as sixth 7.02%, Blow molder short stops generation within Company were suggested as - make the
ranked as seventh 6.8%, Speed loss ranked as eighth 6.6%, workplace clean and Place quality control system in proper
Syrup pump problem ranked as ninth 6.29% and date coder place. This refers that sufficient number of checkers, trained
printing fault ranked as tenth 6.08%. These major defects checkers, and analysis of reports take action based on the
contributed 77.8% of the overall rejection. Therefore, it is quality check reports. Therefore, set standard operating
obvious that most of all rejections (defects) will decrease, if procedures (SOP) for each task performed by your employees
the causes for major defects are reduced. The CED and for quality control system for each of department. The
methodology has been used to know top priority defect type defective percentage reduced after implementing the given
and identify the root causes in different PET product suggestions is shown here below.
The data recorded is not manual instead they used software Vighneswara Rao. K received the Ph.D in
which is called SAP. Because of this the data is not recorded Chemical Engineering from Jawaharlal Nehru
automatically as the problems have been seen. However, they Technological University Hyderabad, India in
record the data on their own notes and record on the software 2015. He is staying in Ethiopia and working as an
after some hours, days, weeks or months. Assistant Professor in Dept. of Chemical Engg., Wollega
University, Shambu Campus. He is focusing on the research
Another problem in the company is some workers of the areas of Cyclone Separators, powder properties and
company are not fully responsible for their professionals, characterization, bulk solid materials handling, Particle
when some problems happened they do not take quick Technology, Renewable Energy sources, Energy &
measurements. So the company should be record all the Environment and Safety Hazard Management.
required information at each department with the use of
automatic machines and reserve production lines where it is Dereje Geleta Oljira received BSc. Degree in
sensitive to response quickly. Agricultural and Bioprocess Engineering from
Ambo University and MSc. Degree in Mechanical
References Engineering (Industrial Engineering) from
Wollega University in 2014 and 2019 respectively. He is
[1] Montgomery, D. (2005). Introduction to Statistical working as a Faculty in Agricultural Engineering department,
Quality Control. 5th Edition. New York: John Wiley. Wollega University, Shambu campus and he focusing on
[2] Lew, S. S. (2014). Consumer Purchase Intention toward research areas of Modeling and Simulation of Industrial and
Product Made in Malaysia vs. Made in China. A Production Systems, Applied Operational Research and
Conceptual Paper Journal of Social and Behavioral Optimization techniques, Supply Chain and Logistic
Sciences, 130, 37-45. Management, Production Operation and management and
[3] McDaniel, C. L. (2011). Introduction to Marketing. 11th Lean Manufacturing.
Edition. South Western: Cengage Learning, China
[4] Bilsel, R. L. (2012). Ishikawa cause and effect diagrams
using capture recapture techniques. Quality technology
and quantitative management, 9(2), pp 137-152.
[5] Brucks, M. Z. (2000). Price and Brand Name as
Indicator Quality Dimension for Consumer Durables.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(3),
359-374.
[6] De Feo, J. (2015). Juran's Quality Management and
Analysis. New York: McGraw Hill.
[7] Kassaw, M. (2013). Competitive Model Development for
Ethiopian Traditional Fashion in the Global Market.
Addis Ababa University.
[8] Sureshchandar, G. C. (2001). A conceptual Model for
total quality management in service Organizations. Total
Quality Management, 12(3), 343-363.
[9] Wikipedia Dictionary retrieved from:
http://www.ilocis.org/documents/chpt65e.htm)
[10] August 24, 2018.