Organizational Behavior: Chapter 3: Personality and Values
Organizational Behavior: Chapter 3: Personality and Values
II/ VALUES.
- Values: Values represent basic convictions that “a specific mode of conduct or end-state of existence is
personally or socially preferable to an opposite or converse mode of conduct or end-state of existence”.
- Attributes of values:
+ The content attribute – the mode of conduct or end-state of existence is important.
+ The intensity attribute – specifies just how important the content is.
- Value system:
+ A hierarchy based on a ranking of an individual’s values in terms of their intensity.
+ Tend to be relatively stable and enduring (or constant and consistent).
1. The Importance of Values.
- Provide understanding of the attitudes, motivations, and behaviors.
- Influence our perception of the world around us.
- Represent interpretations of “right” and “wrong”.
- Imply that some behaviors or outcomes are preferred over others.
2. Terminal vs. Instrumental Values (Rokeach Value Survey).
- Milton Rokeach created the Rokeach Value Survey (RVS). It consists of two sets of values, each
containing 18 individual value items.
- Terminal values: refers to desirable end-states; the goals a person would like to achieve during his or her
lifetime.
- Instrumental values: refers to preferable modes of behavior or means of achieving the terminal values.
- People in the same occupations or categories (corporate managers, union members, parents, students) tend
to hold similar values.
+ But values vary between groups.
+ Values differences make it difficult for group to negotiate and may create conflict.
- The theory argues that satisfaction is highest and turnover lowest when personality and occupation are
in agreement.
- Three key points to this model:
+ There do appear to be intrinsic differences in personality among individuals.
+ There are different types of jobs.
+ People in jobs congruent with their personality should be more satisfied and less likely to voluntarily
resign than people in incongruent jobs.
- The relationship among personality types:
- In addition to matching the individual’s personality to the job, managers are also concerned with:
3.2. Person-organization fit.
- The employee’s personality must fit with the organizational culture.
- People are attracted to organizations that match their values.
- Those who match are most likely to be selected.
- Mismatches will result in turnover.
- Can use the Big Five Model personality types to match to the organizational culture.
III/ GLOBAL IMPLICATIONS.
1. Personality.
- Do frameworks like the Big Five Model transfer across culture?
+ Yes, but the frequency of type in the culture may vary.
+ Better in individualistic than in the collectivist culture.
2. Values.
- Values differ across culture.
- Geert Hofstede’s Framework for accessing culture – 5 value dimensions:
2.1. Power distance.
- Describes the degree to which people in a country accept that power in institutions and organizations is
distributed unequally.
+ High distance: Extremely unequal power distribution between those with status/wealth and those
without status/wealth.
+ Low distance: Relatively equal power between those with status/wealth and those without
status/wealth.
2.2. Individualism versus Collectivism.
- Individualism is the degree to which people prefer to act as individuals rather than as members of groups
and believe in individual rights above all else.
- Collectivism emphasizes a tight social framework in which people expect others in groups of which they
are a part to look after them and protect them.
2.3. Masculinity versus Femininity.
- Masculinity is the extent to which the society values work roles of achievement, power, and control, and
where assertiveness and materialism are also valued.
- Femininity is the extent to which there is little differentiation between roles for men and women; and
treats women as the equals of men in all respects.
2.4. Uncertainty avoidance.
- Describe the degree to which people in a country prefer structured over unstructured situation.
+ High avoidance: People have an increased level of anxiety about uncertainty and ambiguity and use
laws and controls to reduce uncertainty.
+ Low avoidance: People are more accepting of ambiguity, are less rule oriented, take more risks, and
more readily accept change.
2.5. Long-term versus Short-term orientation.
- Long-term orientation: People look to the future and value thrift, persistence, and tradition.
- Short-term orientation: People value the here and now; they accept change more readily and do not see
commitments as impediments to change.
3. An Assessment of the Hofstede’s Framework.
- There are regional differences within countries.
- The original data is old and based on only one company.
- Hofstede had to make many judgement calls while doing the research.
- Some results do not match what is believed to be true about given countries.
- Despite these problems, it remains a very popular framework.
4. The GLOBE framework for Accessing culture.
- Begun in 1993, the Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE) research
program is an ongoing cross-cultural investigation of leadership and national culture.
- It identified nine dimensions on which national cultures differ.
- Similar to Hofstede’s Framework with these additional dimensions:
+ Human orientation: the degree to which a society rewards individuals for being altruistic, generous,
and kind to others.
+ Performance orientation: the degree to which a society encourages and rewards group members for
performance improvement and excellence.
IV/ SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGERS.
1. Personality.
- Screen for the Big Five traits conscientiousness.
- Take into account the situational factors as well.
- MBTI can help with training and development.
2. Values.
- Often underlie and explain attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions.
- Employees’ performance and satisfaction are likely to be higher if their values fit well with the
organization.
- Managers are more likely to appreciate, evaluate positively, and allocate rewards to employees who fit in,
and employees are more likely to be satisfied if they perceive they do fit in.