Teaching English As A Foreign Language Fluency, Accuracy, Appropriateness, and Communicativeness in CLT
Teaching English As A Foreign Language Fluency, Accuracy, Appropriateness, and Communicativeness in CLT
Arranged by Group 8:
Class: 5C
2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................2
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................3
CHAPTER II DISCUSSION...........................................................................................................5
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................13
2
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
For teachers in this world, they can use Communication Language Teaching to teach
students in the classroom. After teachers implement CLT in the classroom, teachers hope that
students can be able to speak English fluently in front of people, pronounce accurately, choose
an appropriate speech and apply with others in their life, and showing communicativeness in the
classroom. That will make a good atmosphere in the class and students can be easy to speak
English like a native speaker. So, they're expected to be mastered and improve the speaking of a
second language. Fluency, accuracy, appropriateness, and communicativeness is related to the
speaking skill. So, the goal of language education is the ability to communicate in the target
language.
3
3. What is the important of Fluency, Accuracy, Appropriateness, Communicativeness /
Intelligibility in CLT?
4
CHAPTER II
DISCUSSION
According to journal (Ho, 2018) fluency defined as the ability to use the language
quickly and confidently without too much hesitation or too many pauses to cause barriers in
communication (Bailey, 2003; Byrne, 1986). In the process of learning English as a foreign
language has frequently occurred in the minds and though of both teachers and students recently.
In other word, fluency is an expectation for anyone who wish to be competent in a target
language that they have spent their time and efforts to acquire it. According to journal (Maisa,
2018) the concept of fluency has been used with a distinctive meaning clearly opposed to overall
proficiency or to an end state close to native performance.
According to Fillmore (1979) there are four parameters that people may be thinking
about when making judgments about fluency. They are:
5
1) The ability to talk at length with minimum pauses;
2) The ability to package the message easily into “semantically dense” sentences without
recourse to lots of fillers (for example, “you know”, “the thing is that”, etc.);
3) The ability to speak appropriately in different kinds of social contexts and situations,
meeting the special communicative demands each may have;
4) The ability to use the language creatively and imaginatively by expressing ideas in new
ways, to use humour, puns, metaphors, and so on.
6
than emphasizing upon CLT approach as a complete picture. The aspects of contexts involve
learners’ attitudes towards the target language, cultural differences, expectations and norms that
sometimes play more important role than the methods of teaching (Lee, 2014). And according to
journal (Dewaele, 2008) the concept of appropriateness is at the basis of the model of
communicative competence originally proposed by Hymes (1972).
The concept of appropriateness is also at heart of Lyster‟s (1994) definition of
sociolinguistic competence: “the capacity to recognize and produce socially appropriate speech
in context” . Hymes‟ concept of “appropriateness” has remained central in sociolinguistic
research. And Hymes’ focus on appropriateness caused a radical change in language teaching
practice. The application of Hymes‟ concepts in the Communicative Language Teaching
approach has been imperfect from a SLA point of view. Course material typically proposes a
decontextualised idealization of language use, i.e., idealized typifications of what native speakers
may say and do in specified contexts (Holliday 2005; Leung 2005).
2.1.4 The Definition of Communicativeness
According to journal (Heng, 2014) CLT is a learner-centred approach where teachers are
no longer regarded as knowledge givers and learners not knowledge receivers, and the prime
focus or ultimate goal of this communicative approach is to develop learners' communicative
competence through a variety of classroom tasks and activities. Lightbown and Spada (2013) see
CLT as an approach to teaching which emphasizes the communication of meanings in interaction
rather than the practice of grammatical forms in isolation. They believe that successful language
learning involves not only knowledge of the structures and forms of a language, but also the
functions and purposes that a language serves in different communicative settings. Moreover,
Littlewood (1981) states the communicative approach helps to broaden our perspective on
language and language learning. Therefore, the CLT approach aims to provide students with
opportunities and strategies to build up their communicative competence, a concept very central
to CLT.
a) Communicative Competence
According to Chomsky competence refers to "the speaker-hearer's knowledge of the
language" and performance is "the actual use of language in concrete situations" (1965, p.
4). In other words, competence is the knowledge of grammar or the linguistic system that
7
a speaker possesses while performance is the actual utterance or speech production which
reflects a speaker's competence.
Thus, the notion of communicative competence involves knowledge of the language and
the ability to apply the underlying knowledge in real communication in appropriate
contexts.
According to Richards (2005), the following aspects of language knowledge can be observed
in communicative competence:
1. Knowing how to use language for a range of different purposes and functions.
2. Knowing how to vary our use of language according to the setting and the
participants (e.g., knowing when to use formal and informal speech or when to use
language appropriately for written as opposed to spoken communication).
3. Knowing how to produce and understand different types of texts (e.g., narratives,
reports, interviews, conversations).
4. Knowing how to maintain communication despite having limitations in one’s
language knowledge (e.g., through using different kinds of communication strategies)
(p. 3).
b) Communicative Activities
Littlewood (1981) highlights four purposes of communicative activities which positively
contribute to the process of language learning. The first purpose is to provide learners with
what he called "whole-task practice", the opportunity to practice a combination of individual
skills to master a larger one (p. 17). Second is to improve learners' motivation, which means
helping learners understand how they can achieve their objectives (ability to communicate
with others) through participating in different classroom activities. The third purpose
involves promoting learners' natural learning through using the target language for
communication both inside or outside the classroom. The last contribution that
communicative activities have to offer is to "create a context which supports learning" (p.
18).
Littlewood (1981), moreover, divides communicative activities into two main categories:
"functional communicative activities and social interaction activities" (p. 20). Functional
communicative activities involve an information gap or a problem for learners to solve using
8
the language available to them at their specific level. Thus, this kind of activities requires
learners to do whatever they can with the language at their disposal to share, discuss, and
evaluate information and to get their intended meanings across. As for the social interaction
activities, Littlewood argues that not only do learners have to pay attention to the aim of
communication, that is, to get the messages across effectively, but they also have to focus on
12 "the social context in which the interaction takes place" (p. 20). Thus, social interaction
activities are the kind of activities that provide learners with an opportunity to simulate
communication or interaction more likely to be found in the real world outside the classroom.
Such activities may include conversations, discussions, dialogues, role plays, debates,
improvisations, and other simulation activities.
9
words; texts may be used in any mode (skill), regardless of how they are used in real
life (dialogues may be written, written texts used for listening); the target items are
usually practiced out of context or situation; Activities: students' attention is focused
on a particular target item; their output is usually predictable; their performance is
assessed on how few language mistakes are made; students' errors are corrected; tasks
do not usually simulate real-life situations
2. Accuracy Activity
Accuracy in speaking performance deals with pronunciation, grammar and
vocabulary
a. Reflect classroom use of language
b. Focus of the formation of correct examples of language
c. Practice language out of context
d. practice samples of language
e. Do not require meaningful communication
Purpose: the primary purpose is to help students practice language in listening,
speaking, reading, and/or writing activities to so develop fluency in using the
language in spontaneous communication. Material: the texts are usually whole
pieces of discourses: conversation, stories, etc.; texts are usually used as they would
be in real life: dialogues are spoken, articles and written stories are read; an effort is
made to use authentic material from real life. Activities: students' attention is focused
on communicating information and expressing ideas; their output may not always be
predictable; their performance is assessed on how well ideas are expressed or
understood; students' errors are not corrected unless it interferes with communication;
tasks often simulate real-life situations.
3. Appropriateness and Communicativeness
Appropriateness means that students can be able to answer a question or something
like that in a polite way.
Below is the implementation of appropriateness in classroom;
a. Teacher give an exercise to students, and students can answer very well
b. Teacher ask the students to speak in front of class, and their speech is really good
because words are used politely
10
Students answers "yes ma'am, yes miss, alright miss or mister" than "yea, ok, hm"
The implementation of the communicativeness can be seen from the students active
participation in the classroom, for example;
a. Students ask the teacher about the material that they still not understood
b. Some student speak often than their friends
c. Students active in the discussion
d. Teacher make a good atmosphere in the class, so students are very happy to
responds
"It is now very clear that fluency and accuracy are both important goals to pursue in
CLT." (Brown, 2001, p. 268). Appropriateness and Communicativeness is the two that really
important too.
One might see someone speaking English fluently and people can understand that person
easily, Accuracy is about using correct grammar in speaking and writing. It is about
understanding the deeper meaning and usage of vocabulary and also involves the correct
pronunciation of words. It takes lots of practice to be accurate, and it is something we must work
towards little by little. That is why fluently and accuracy is very important to the English
learning activity.
We as a human should speak politely to others, we should see the condition or the situation
to speak, if we want to speak informally to others, we can choose friend to speak informally. But,
if we in the critical condition or environment (school), we should pay attention to the language
that we used, that’s the important of appropriateness. Next, the important of communicativeness,
we as a teacher should engaged the students to response and active in our class, so from the
communicativeness, students will be able to ask, discuss, and present more and more.
11
CHAPTER III
CONCLUSION
12
REFERENCES
Dewaele, J.-M. (2008). "Appropriateness" in foreign language acquisition and use: Some
theoritical, methodolical and ethical considerations. ResearchGate, 235-255.
Gibbons, T. (2017, June 21). Accuracy and Fluency: What’s The Big Deal? Diambil kembali
dari theteflacademy: https://www.theteflacademy.com/blog/2017/06/accuracy-vs-
fluency-whats-the-big-deal/
Khan, A. A., Ahmad, H., & Shah, S. R. (2016). The Effectiveness of CLT in the ESL Context of
Pakistan. Global Language Review (GLR), 85-111.
Maisa, S. (2018). Language Fluency and Its Evaluation: . Language in India, 320-329.
ugli, T. G. (2018, July). The importance of accuracy and fluency in english language. Diambil
kembali dari journalpro.ru: http://journalpro.ru/articles/the-importance-of-accuracy-and-
fluency-in-english-language/
13