Bridgebulletin 2018 07
Bridgebulletin 2018 07
JULY 2018
ALSO INSIDE:
Comeback Kings
U.S. Bridge Championship goes the distance
Student Orientation
College Bridge Bowl welcomes all to Atlanta
Vision Quest
New view of the
bridge table
Year-End Report
Bay Area High School
Championship
Bulletin
BRIDGE
Features
9 Prize Fight U.S. Bridge Championship goes the distance
18 Road Trip College Bridge Bowl welcomes all to Atlanta
20 Poetic License The best (and worst) of reader-submitted bridge haiku
22 Vision Quest New sight aid illuminates bridge table
25 Murray Remembered Bridge legend Eric Murray dies
32 From Sarah’s Seat Bay Area High School Championship report
18 20
60 KAREN WALKER
Bidding Matters
61 FRANK STEWART
My Bridge and Yours
64 GEORGE JACOBS
George’s World
65 BILLY MILLER
Dear Billy
66 DAVID BIRD
Hardcore players
I have been teaching advanced be- cause I play only once or twice a week. It seems that the Rabbi was working
ginner bridge at the Manhasset Library I have no desire to spend all kinds of overtime to give me three good results!
every Friday afternoon for the past 14 money going to Nashville, Miami, San ED ALCOFF
years. Several weeks ago, we experi- Francisco or Vancouver (hotels are Plymouth Meeting PA
enced a power failure. We play in the expensive). Even if I traveled to those
community room, which is downstairs places, I would have to spend time do- Southern hospitality
and has no windows. That room went ing things with my wife, who does not While attending a medical seminar
totally dark. I went upstairs to find out play bridge. I would consider going to in late April in Charlotte NC, I discov-
what was going on and was told we Montreal or Ottawa to play, because ered that my schedule would be light
needed to evacuate the building im- they are a short distance away, but the on a Saturday afternoon, so I searched
mediately. expense is still there. So why not have online for a local club and found the
When I went down to tell my class occasional Regional Event at Club Charlotte Bridge Club. I placed a call
the news, all eight tables were filled House (REACH) games where gold and spoke to Dave Sutherland, who
with my students using their cell points could be earned at local clubs? said I was welcome for a game that day.
phones for light, and they were still Let’s not cater to only the rich, but to He even said that he would try to find
playing the hand I had prepared. all bridge players, regardless of their me a partner.
When I told them we had to leave, they wealth. Between seminar sessions on Satur-
all asked if they could stay just long PHIL J. DUMONTIER day morning, Dave left a message at the
enough for me to explain how to bid the Kingston ON hotel desk that indicated that he had
hand. found a partner for me.
Do we love our game? Yes! Overworked Rabbi So I took a cab to the club – an at-
SUSAN WEISS Playing in the open pairs of the Clay- tractive building in a very nice neigh-
Jericho NY mont (Wilmington) Regional in May, I borhood – and teamed up with Susan
wonder if I set some sort of record with Wade, who turned out to be an excel-
Cutting the deck the “Rabbi’s Rule.” During the two ses- lent partner. The folks at the bridge
Many clubs now use dealing ma- sions, I dropped three singleton kings club were gracious and friendly with-
chines to create hands as part of the as declarer. out fail. And after a pleasant afternoon
Common Game. While playing Board One was obvious when my left-hand of bridge, my partner was kind enough
6 at my local club a few weeks ago, I opponent did not overruff a side suit to give me a ride back to the seminar
removed my cards from the East slot that I had ruffed with the trump jack, for a late afternoon session.
and counted 12½ cards! I had half of telling me that the trump king was off- This excursion was a very pleasant
the ♥3, and my North opponent had side of dummy’s A–Q–x–x–x. So when break in a week of seminar meetings.
13½ cards. You would think he had the I tackled trumps, I played the ace, fell- Thank you Dave, Susan and the folks at
other half of the guillotined 3, but no, ing the singleton king. the Charlotte Bridge Club.
he had half of the ♣7. Go figure. We The second was in a 3♥ contract WARREN NICKERSON
weren’t sure how to bid that one ... on a 4–3 fit, with a club side suit of Cotuit MA
CARL GUELI A–Q–x–x–x opposite my void. I
Great Neck NY pitched a loser on the ♣A and the king Handicap fix
dropped. Handicap games are a great way
Making gold points in REACH The third was when I was in 3NT to level the playing field. Recently,
In response to the “REACH” letter after my LHO had preempted in hearts. however, the Gainesville Bridge Club
in the April issue, why should bridge I was down to the ♠A Q opposite two
be a game for the “rich”? I am cur- low ones. If I played the ace, I had nine
Letters to the editor are welcome by regular mail and email.
rently 69 years old and have been a tricks, which I thought would be a good Brevity is considered a virtue, as is subject matter with relevance
member since 1993. In this time, I have result, but when I did so, LHO dropped to a majority of ACBL members. Unsigned letters are not
considered for publication, so please include your name and
amassed only 800 masterpoints be- his stiff king. Making four. hometown. Letters may be edited. All letters will receive a
response. Send emails to editor@acbl.org.
conducted one, and it caused huge Their raw score of 55.10% gives them some tourneys have such small fields
confusion among the players, mainly a bonus of 12.5% of 55.1% = 6.889% for that it is not practical to run a new-
because they did not know what their a total with handicap of 61.99%. Had comer game. As a result, novices may
handicaps were in advance (or even handicaps been awarded on the basis find themselves playing against much
how it was arrived at after the game). of average masterpoints, no bonus stronger players. So, good behavior
Further, as a club director and full- would result, and the Rookie/Sectional becomes paramount. Fortunately, most
time statistician, I believe that the Master pair would have inappropriate- ACBL directing staff are excellent in
method for implementing handicap ly finished higher than the Life Master/ this regard.
in ACBLscore – which is based on the Junior Master pair. Which brings us back to cost. Pre-
average masterpoints of the pair – to It would be easy to add a field in the sumably, the ACBL is concerned about
be invalid statistically. player database for handicaps. In a table count. Anything that reduces
Here’s the current ACBL Handicap club game, you could get ACBLscore table count must be bad for tourneys
Formula (abbreviated for space): to print out the handicaps as soon as and for the ACBL. Maintaining and
the names have been entered into the increasing table count can be done by
Player Rank Handicap Bonus system. No surprises would occur. The making the game more attractive and
Rookie (0–5) 30% MyACBL site could keep track of your affordable for non-committed players.
Junior Master (5–20) 25% handicap. It is also essential to bring younger
Club Master (20–50) 20% JON SHUSTER players into the game. Here are some of
Sectional Master (50–100) 15% Gainesville FL my ideas:
Regional Master (100–200) 10% 1. Anyone in a full-time study pro-
NABC Master (200–non LM) 5% Temporary solution? gram (with some sort of proof, such as
Life Master (under 500) 2% I am aware of the new ACBL policy a student ID) gets a reduced member-
Life Master (500+) 0% to introduce “temporary” member- ship and reduced entry fee.
ships for non-ACBL members. This 2. Anyone coming to a tournament
Here’s what I propose: Each player supposedly will encourage people to for the first time is given a free tempo-
is assigned a handicap based on their become full members of the ACBL. rary membership. This is valid for their
masterpoint total. This is represented As someone who has been actively first year.
by a percentage inflation factor. Bor- involved in small sectional tourna- 3. I would also strongly suggest
rowing from golf, the pair receives the ments, however, I think the effect of that all players with less than some
average of the two players’ handicaps this will be counterproductive. arbitrary level of masterpoints get a
(not the handicap based on the average A sizeable number of casual play- reduced entry.
masterpoint holding). Then, the final ers do not want to belong to the ACBL. 4. Looking at the ACBL finan-
score is calculated as the raw percent- They do not mind participating in cial statements, I was struck that the
age achieved at the table multiplied by ACBL tournaments occasionally, but travel and entertainment component
the net handicap percentage. people already balk at the cost of tour- attached to the NABCs in 2016 was
Two examples will illustrate: Ac- naments, so they will see the “tempo- more than $540,000, whereas the total
cording to the current ACBL Handicap rary” membership as a disincentive expense for membership development
Formula, a Rookie gets 30% and her rather than an inducement to join. was just over $407,000. This indicates
partner, a Sectional Master, gets 15%. Obviously, the goal of the ACBL is to me that the NABCs have more
Their average handicap is (30 + 15)% to attract new members. What are the cachet than attracting new members.
divided by two, which is 22.5%. If their deterrents for people becoming mem- I suggest that the importance and
raw score was 49.67%, their bonus is bers? I would say that cost is a factor, frequency of the NABCs need to be
22.5% of 49.67% or 11.18%. This makes particularly for young people and also considered in the context of the inter-
their final (handicap) score of 60.85%. for people on a fixed income. I would est of the average ACBL member (or
Now, when a Life Master with 8200 also say that fear of being embarrassed potential member).
points (0% bonus) plays with a Junior is a factor for some people. BUZ TREVOR
Master (25%), they get a handicap of (0 How can the ACBL address these Saskatoon SK
+ 25)% divided by two, which is 12.5%. issues? Newcomer games are fine, but
Winners of the U.S. Bridge Championship and a berth as USA1 in next year’s Bermuda Bowl:
Steve Weinstein, captain Nick Nickell, Ralph Katz, coach Eric Kokish, Jeff Meckstroth, Eric Rodwell and Robert Levin.
Like two prize fighters, the teams their entrance in the round of 16. By game contract and picking up 12 IMPs.
captained by Nick Nickell and Hemant virtue of their appearance in the final (Hamman and Adam Grossack also
Lall battled for 120 boards only to of the Vanderbilt Knockout Teams, drove to 3NT holding Wooldridge’s
see their quest for the U.S. Bridge FLEISHER and NICKELL were cards; they ended up tying the board in
Championship come down to the last seeded No. 1 and No. 2 and drew a bye their quarterfinal match.)
deal. In an exciting comeback, it was to the quarterfinals.
NICKELL in front 240–229 when the FLEISHER (Marty Fleisher–Chip Dlr: North
♠72
final bell sounded. Martel; Eric Greco–Geoff Hampson; Vul: E–W ♥ 10 6
With the win, the Nickell team Brad Moss–Joe Grue) was bounced Bd: 25 ♦J96543
claims the USA1 berth for the 2019 early when Paul Fireman’s team ♣KQ5
Bermuda Bowl to be held in Sanya, (Gavin Wolpert; John Hurd–Joel ♠J95 ♠ K 10 8
China. The USA2 team will be de- Wooldridge; Vincent Demuy–John ♥AJ9842 ♥KQ73
termined in trials hosted by the U.S. Kranyak) slipped by them to win ♦A ♦ K 10 7
Bridge Federation next year. 207–193 in the quarterfinals. ♣ A 10 7 ♣964
Nickell’s team roster is Ralph In other quarterfinal action, ♠AQ643
Katz; Jeff Meckstroth–Eric Rodwell; Team Juster (Jeffrey Juster–Frank ♥5
and Bobby Levin–Steve Weinstein. Merblum; Adam Grossack–Zachary ♦Q82
Crewing for Lall were Reese Milner; Grossack, Howard Weinstein–Adam ♣J832
Kevin Bathurst–Justin Lall; and Zia Wildavsky) upset ROSENTHAL
Mahmood–Jacek “Pepsi” Pszczola. 247–212. NICKELL scored a solid West North East South
USBF’s 2018 championship, held 253–171 win over MAHAFFEY (Jim Hurd Hampson W’dridge Greco
over 10 days in mid-May in Houston Mahaffey–Sam Lev; John Schermer– Pass 1♣ 1♠
TX, drew 21 teams. A two-day, round- Neil Chambers; Billy Cohen–Gary 2♥ Pass 2NT Pass
robin Swiss eliminated seven teams. Cohler), and LALL, despite a sluggish 3NT All Pass
Subsequent head-to-head knockout start, overcame the Bob Morris (npc)
rounds consisted of 120 boards played squad (Michael Levine–Eddie Wold; Looking at balanced, soft values that
over two days. Mike Passell–Marc Jacobus; Greg were better led up to than through,
The No. 3 seed, led by Andrew Hinze–David Grainger) 212–200. Wooldridge proposed notrump rather
Rosenthal (Aaron Silverstein; Bob A keen bid by Wooldridge paid off than raising hearts. The heart suit
Hamman–David Berkowitz; Eldad for FIREMAN on this deal from the might work just as well in notrump,
Ginossar–Chris Willenkin), made last segment, right-siding a vulnerable plus there was no danger of a ruff.
West North East South continuing hearts, but instead, sought On the penultimate spade, East
M’stroth Pepsi Rodwell Zia to break up a possible squeeze with the can spare a heart. Dummy discards a
Pass Pass diamond shift. club and West must choose between
Pass 1♠ Pass 1NT Analyzing the play on Bridge Win- guarding hearts or diamonds. Let’s
Pass 3♣ Pass 3♦ ners, world champion Bart Bramley say he throws the ♥Q (he knows his
Pass 4♠ Pass 5♦ says, “I don’t recall ever seeing a com- partner has the ace). Then comes the
Pass 5♥ Pass 6♠ pound count squeeze before.” fatal last trump. East must protect
All Pass A count squeeze pressures a player hearts at this point, so he releases a
who does not guard a critical suit (on diamond. Dummy throws the now
Pepsi announced his strong spade this deal, West in clubs) in such a way useless ♥J, and the spotlight turns
hand. With four controls (A=2, K=1), as to give declarer a count of the suit, to West. Meckstroth cannot let go of
Zia was certainly interested in slam, allowing him to drop an honor instead a diamond, or dummy’s ♦8 seals the
and said so with 5♦. When Pepsi coun- of taking a losing finesse. slam, so he must part with a low club.
tered with 5♥, Zia needed no further Here’s how it works. Declarer wins Pepsi plays a club to dummy’s ♣K,
encouragement to bid six. the diamond shift in dummy and runs cashes the ♦K, pitching a club from
Rodwell led the ♥K, then shifted to spades. East can throw two hearts, hand. When he plays a club back to his
a low diamond. Pepsi won the ace in and West can discard a heart and two hand and West follows suit, he has a
dummy and cashed five top spades. He diamonds. complete count on the clubs, and he
then played a club to the king, cashed knows that the only remaining club –
the ♦K, pitching a club, and finessed ♠84 the queen – will fall under his ace.
the ♣J, losing to East’s queen. Down ♥— “If Rodwell instead throws both of
one. ♦— his hearts,” Bramley explains, “then
Was there a better play for the slam ♣ A J 10 5 dummy throws its low diamond. When
than getting a count on the hand and ♠— ♠— Pepsi crosses to the ♣K and cashes the
relying on a roughly 60% finesse (clubs ♥Q ♥ A 10 ♦K, Meckstroth is count-squeezed to
are known to be three in the West and ♦ Q 10 ♦J9 release a club, as he needs to keep the
two in the East)? ♣942 ♣Q7 ♥Q.”
As it turns out, yes. ♠— The last board was good for 11 IMPs
The deal is actually way more ♥J NICKELL’s way. And it was with this
complicated than it looks. First, the ♦K8 flurry of fireworks that the champi-
defenders didn’t help declarer out by ♣K86 onship ended with NICKELL on top
240–229. ◾
14 Bridge Bulletin July 2018
Peaches and Dreams
Atlanta hosts the Summer NABC July 26–Aug. 5
Don’t let the Summer NABC in Atlanta pass you by July 26–
Aug. 5. The huge bridge party draws players from all over the
world, and there are events slated for every level – from those
new to the game and eager to learn more, to world champs.
If you’ve never been to an NABC, you’re missing out on an
amazing bridge experience. Play and talk about the game all day
and into the night, if you want. Intermediate/newcomer players
are greeted with special Southern warmth: celebrity lectures
and free games and lessons provide a perfect opportunity to up
your game while meeting new friends from all over the country.
The Youth NABC, which runs Aug. 2–4, is an exclusive op-
portunity for kids up to 19 to play cards and meet new friends.
The Baron Barclay National Youth Open Pairs and the National
Youth Swiss Teams also provide a competitive shot at scholar-
ship funding.
Site
Friday, July 27 All events will be played at the Atlanta
9:15 a.m. Jerry Helms The Defensive Mindset Marriott Marquis at 265 Peachtree
6:45 p.m. Robert Todd Problem Opening Bids Center Ave.
Saturday, July 28
Air travel
9:15 a.m. Patty Tucker The Match Game
Omega World Travel is the official
Sunday, July 29 travel agency for the ACBL. For air
9:15 a.m. Phillip Alder Top Tip of all Time travel assistance, call 800–969–4152, fax
6:45 p.m. Frank Stewart Logical Thinking 866–445–6705 or email info@owt.net.
Monday, July 30
9:15 a.m. Marty Nathan Intro to Signaling Transportation
6:45 p.m. William Bedard Cuebid Limit Raise MARTA provides efficient, inexpensive
Tuesday, July 31 rail and bus service linking the downtown
9:15 a.m. Norman Beck Odd Things to Help with the Game area with the airport and outlying hotels.
6:45 p.m. Julian Laderman Inspired Declarer Play The MARTA stop is a block from the play-
ing site.
Wednesday, Aug. 1
9:15 a.m. Ellen Kent Panicville
6:45 p.m. Norma Sands Opening Leads
Thursday, Aug. 2
9:15 a.m. GS Jade Barrett How to Succeed in Bridge
6:45 p.m. Carole Budnick The Strip and Endplay
Friday, Aug. 3
9:15 a.m. Lisa Berkowitz Playing to Trick One
6:45 p.m. Mike Flader Ruling the Game
(See advertisment on pg. 11)
Saturday, Aug. 4
9:15 a.m. Kevin Wilson Fitting Honors
The 2018 Collegiate Bridge Bowl promises to be bigger Scholarships will be awarded to all players on the top four
and offer better prizes than in the past. In yet another new teams and to the top three players in the individual event.
format for the event, at least 12 teams will compete for The scholarship pool has increased by 80 percent. Team
$36,000 in scholarships in Atlanta. The event takes place awards are $15,000, $10,000, $5000 and $2500; individual
during the second weekend of the Summer NABC, Aug. 2–4. awards are $2000, $1000 and $500.
It is an open event for teams of eligible players attending the Travel awards are $1000 per person for up to six people
same college, so no pre-qualification is necessary. per team. Teams are allowed to replace members and give
There were, however, two qualifying online tournaments the travel subsidies to players other than those who played
to determine eight of the 10 travel package winners. Teams in the tournaments.
from Georgia Tech, Berkeley, Princeton and Columbia won Teams entering include:
travel subsidies in the first tournament. Carleton, Harvey California-Berkeley – Armin Askari, Kevin Rosenberg,
Mudd, Minnesota and Northwestern did in the second. Chengwei Li, Mingyang Zhou, Xinchen Zhu
The ACBL Educational Foundation increased funding California-Santa Barbara – Andrew Rowberg, Jon Martin,
to offer two more teams travel subsidies, and these were Michael Swift, Nicholas Adamski, Danning Lu, Carol Tsai
based on participation in College Bridge Online games, with Carleton College – Alexander Frieden, Thomas Scruggs,
12 points awarded for friendly team matches and 1 point Sophia Maymudes, Jeffrey Boitnott, Jackson Wahl
awarded for individual robot games. UC Santa Barbara and Columbia – Yang Zu, Jianheng Hu, Max Krawczyk, Jing
Maryland won these activity awards. Zhang
Because the event is being held in Atlanta – local for Georgia Tech – Arjun Dhir, Richard Jeng, Michael
Georgia Tech, which has a large bridge club – Georgia Tech Moschella, Vijay Nambi, Justin Shiao, Kendrick Wong
plans to send three teams to the Bridge Bowl. Harvey Mudd College – Emma Kolesnik, Jake Williams,
The three-day, six-session event begins with a three-ses- Daniel Sonner, Nicholas Koskelo
sion Swiss qualifying event, from which the top eight teams Maryland – Hakan Berk, Teddy Corrales, Brian Scheff,
will advance. There will be one-session knockout rounds for Alexandra Servey, Zachary Star, Kevin DiCola
the quarterfinals, semifinals and final. Minnesota – Sean McNally, Matt Hoffman, Zeren Shui,
Another new feature is a three-session individual event Ben Popken, Sarah Eyer and Augustine Redington
following the Swiss. Members of teams that don’t advance Northwestern – Kyle Rockoff, Luke Robinson, Joey
from the Swiss can enter this, and those who are knocked Lieberman, David Cheng, Sarik Goyal
out in the quarterfinal round can also drop into it in the Princeton – Nathan Finkle, Sam Berman, Amber Lin,
second session. Aaron Balleisen.
Let’s start with a sample of some of A distaste for system complexity Ginny Barklow of Sequim WA had
the better efforts. Here’s one from Jim compelled Paul Bluestein of Bridge- this take:
Flint of Ashland OR: port CT to submit this one he calls
“Mercy”: I try not to flinch
Key card gone awry when I discover my trumps
Partner passed my queen-ask bid Conventions galore: split five and zero.
Played a two-one fit. Bergen, Drury, DOPI, DONT.
Have mercy. No more. Ray Adams of Turlock CA wrote
Been there, done that, Jim. Stop about a happier outcome:
whining. Another popular theme was that of
The theme of bidding misunder- unfortunate results or layouts. This His queen beats my jack
standings and bad judgment were submission from Bill Langlois of San but coup scores knave en passant.
popular ones, however. Here’s one from Jose CA, which he called “Two-edged C’est la vie, monsieur.
Harvey Cohen of Sagamore Hills OH: Sword,” is an example:
No doubt Ray’s haiku will be a big hit
Partner’s four club call: Preempts can be fine with our readers in Quebec.
Gerber or a splinter bid? But this one did not fare well. Alan Levine of Massapequa NY,
Too late to ask now. Minus eight hundred. however, brings back the sour outlook:
If you’re lucky, Harvey, the Gerber Merril Harris of Dowelltown TN Played thirteen sessions
response will be the same as your knows how to handle a bad hand: Accumulated no points
response to the splinter. It’s saved me Learning mahjong now.
plenty of times. “Two notrump,” she starts.
Pam Hudson of Hilo HI had a sys- My flat hand’s points are zero. George Fleeson of McLean VA had
tem to deal with potential misunder- She can play it there. sage words of advice:
standings:
Leonard Epstein of Dallas TX re- Bad things happen when
I miss my Stop card. lates an experience many have shared: You’re a couple of points short.
My partner could always tell Learn that lesson well.
Here comes a bad bid. One spade in third seat.
Oh no, I forgot Drury. Pay attention, overbidders. You know
See? The Stop card was useful. Down four at five clubs. who you are.
Midsummer Gold
There’s a new ACBL-wide event on the calendar – the Summer Instant
Matchpoint Game! Go for the gold point at your local club on Monday after-
noon, July 9. (Section tops award one gold point in each direction in qualified
games.) See your score instantly after each deal. Hand records and analysis will
be provided, and winners will be recognized in the Bridge Bulletin.
Following the game, join Sylvia Shi and Daniel Korbel by video as they break
down several of the more interesting hands.
Please go to acbl.org/img for a list of participating clubs.
Mountain of Masterpoints
Below is the data for masterpoints won by ACBL members in 2017:
137,176 members won 6,192,466.81 points at any level of play
15,091 members won 661,835.27 points at online clubs
54,897 members won 277,082.83 points at NAP games at clubs
12,367 members won 34,662.75 points at GNT games at clubs
133,452 members won 3,013,509.69 points at club games
73,187 members won 322,392.08 points at STaC games
58,670 members won 509,688.63 points at sectionals
50,986 members won 1,027,284.71 points at regionals
9,875 members won 128,201.44 points at regional events at NABCs
2,908 members won 41,074.30 points at NABC events (not NABC+)
3,114 members won 121,554.58 points at NABC+ events
1,981 members won points at online clubs only
60,213 members won points at face-to-face clubs only
74,982 members won points at sectionals or higher
53,598 members won points at regionals or higher
4,740 members won points at NABC events only
B
ridge titan Eric Murray, arguably Murray also contributed to bridge
the greatest Canadian player of theory by devising the Murray 2♦
all time, died May 19. Murray, an convention and, most significantly,
ACBL Grand Life Master, was a mem- co-authoring the Drury convention
ber of both the ACBL and Canadian with the eponymous Doug Drury. The
Halls of Fame. The 89-year-old was a now-famous origin of the convention
resident of Orangeville ON. came about when Drury, compelled to
During Murray’s career as a player, protect himself against then-partner
he earned 14 NABC titles, five Canadi- Murray’s penchant for opening light
an national victories and seven medals in third seat, came up with a method WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS
in the world championships: four silver to determine the strength of opener’s
Silver Medal
medals in the Bermuda Bowl repre- hand. Bermuda Bowl
senting North America, two bronze In “civilian” life, Murray was one of 1962, 1966, 1967, 1974
medals in the Olympiad representing Toronto’s top trial lawyers for decades.
Canada, and another bronze in the Murray’s status as an iconic figure Bronze Medal
Rosenblum Cup. in the game was rooted in more than Olympiad
1968, 1972
Murray’s partnership with fellow his technical abilities, outstanding as
Canadian Hall of Famer Sami Kehela they were. His persona as the urbane, Rosenblum Cup
was one of the most powerfully ef- cigar-loving raconteur armed with a le- 1982
fective combinations in the history thally funny sense of humor made him
of the game. Their skill and stamina a larger-than-life figure wherever he NABC TITLES
(they frequently played all or most of went. Of his four second-place finishes Freeman Mixed Board-a-Match Teams
the boards in the days-long, top-level in the Bermuda Bowl – with the famed 1956, 1962
team matches) were an integral part of Italian Blue Team taking the gold on Mitchell Open Board-a-Match Teams
the success of any squad of which they each occasion – Murray quipped, “I 1962
were members. know the Italian national anthem
In addition to Murray’s talent as a by heart.” During the Bermuda Bowl Spingold Knockout Teams
1964, 1965, 1968
player, he was also skilled in bridge scandal of 1975 when two Italian play-
governance. His Hall of Fame entry on ers (Gianfranco Facchini and Sergio Vanderbilt Knockout Teams
the CBF website notes, “As a bridge Zucchelli) were caught passing infor- 1961, 1970
administrator, Murray was the presi- mation by tapping toes, Eric wired a Marcus Cup
dent of the Ontario Bridge League in its message to the American team offering 1959
early days, engineering its union with his services: “I play a reasonable game,
Nail Life Master Pairs
the ACBL, and was District 2 represen- and take a size 14 shoe.”
1963
tative to the ACBL Board of Directors. Fellow Hall of Famer Bob Hamman
He was also the organizing chairman of said, “Murray definitely was the most Rockwell Mixed Pairs
the 1964 Summer NABC. intense opponent I ever faced. You 1963
“Murray, whose energy and drive are never beat Eric. On occasion you might von Zedtwitz Life Master Pairs
legendary, was the prime mastermind have been ahead when the final buzzer 1969
behind the creation of the Canadian sounded, but beating Eric was not in
Wernher Open Pairs
Bridge Federation in 1967. In recogni- the realm of possibility. Intensity was 1954, 1955
tion of all his contributions to bridge the game, Murray was the name. In
in Canada and his leading role in the Eric’s case, they really did throw away CANADIAN TITLES
formation of the Canadian Bridge Fed- the mold: It will be a long wait for a
eration, Murray was named Honorary replacement.” Canadian National Teams Championship
Life Member of the CBF in 2009.” 1980, 1981, 1987
Canadian Senior Teams Championship
2007, 2010
Beyond Beginning Bridge rificing student comprehension. CD-ROM that contains all of the files
Using 2 Over 1 The student textbook covers many that a teacher needs, all of which can
Student textbook and Instructor’s Guide of the usual convention-related topics be printed for distribution to students.
in 2/1 guides: Roman key card Black- The student manual is $25 and is
By Jim Ricker wood, Jacoby 2NT, inverted minors, available either directly from dia-
Textbook: spiral bound, 218 pages new minor forcing, fourth suit forcing, mondbookspublishing@gmail.com or
Instructor’s Guide: Smolen, Michaels, and so on. What from Amazon.com.
spiral bound, 200 pages makes Ricker’s approach different is The Instructor’s Guide is free, but in-
that he incorporates the principles of structors must first purchase a student
Reviewed by Paul Linxwiler losing trick count (LTC) to the mix as manual and be an ACBL-accredited
an additional way to evaluate hands. teacher. Instructors receive a 20%
2/1 how-to guide And there are plenty of exercises avail- discount on subsequent purchases, and
Jim Ricker is a busy man. He’s able for students to practice. shipping is free in the continental U.S.
cranked out quite a few textbooks and Ricker believes that using pre- (taxes and duty extra to Canada).
instructor guides that he uses suc- arranged deals in boards wastes a lot
cessfully in his classes in the Knox- of time in lessons, so he’s developed
ville area. Other teachers have taken “Dealing Sheets” that present stu-
notice and use Ricker’s materials, too. dents with their lesson hands already
His latest effort is “Beyond Beginning printed on them. The Dealing Sheets
Bridge Using 2 Over 1: Tools to Elevate even provide high-card point and LTC
Your Bridge Game,” a terrific text for information with each hand to help
intermediate-level players who want to move things along at a good pace. Rep-
expand their understanding of 2/1 and etition is the key to comprehension,
its associated treatments. Even better, so Ricker strongly prefers to use the
however, is the Instructor’s Guide of Dealing Sheets as a replacement for
the same title. Ricker has developed actual cards. Less time wasted with the
quite a few tricks for increasing the boards means more time spent looking
number of hands that teachers can at the example hands.
present in a typical lesson without sac- The Instructor’s Guide comes with a
28 Bridge Bulletin July 2018
Ruling the Game
rulings@acbl.org
MODERATOR: MATT SMITH
NATIONAL TOURNAMENT DIRECTOR
A Q
auction (including available infer-
For ACBL tournaments, What’s the right way to ences).”
the policy is that the “trav- explain partnership agree- From the General Conditions of
eler scores” or “percentages” ments? Contest for all ACBL events: “All
A
functions of the electronic scoring be players have an obligation to disclose
turned off. It is our opinion that seeing From the Laws of Duplicate their agreements according to the
scores from other participants gives Bridge, Law 40.B.6.a: “When procedures established by ACBL.
the players knowledge of how they’re explaining the significance of When asked, a full explanation of the
doing and may impact their choices partner’s call or play in reply to an op- agreement must be provided. Stating
during later rounds. This may lead to ponent’s inquiry (see Law 20), a player the common or popular name of the
“shooting” by out-of-contention pairs, shall disclose all special information convention is not sufficient. The op-
which begins to skew the legitimate conveyed to him through partnership ponents need not ask exactly the ‘right’
results on boards. ACBL maintains agreement or partnership experience, question. Any request for information
that a player should have their own but he need not disclose inferences should be the trigger. Opponents need
estimation based only upon their own drawn from his knowledge and experi- only indicate the desire for informa-
experience in determining how they’re ence of matters generally known to tion – all relevant disclosures should
doing for a given session. bridge players.” be given automatically. The proper
Having the “traveler results” func- From the Introduction to the Alert way to ask for information is, ‘Please
tion on leads to other problems as Procedures: “The objective of the Alert explain.’”
well: slower play, as players feel the system is for both pairs at the table to Note that players should never offer
need to discuss all those other results; have equal access to all information explanations phrased as “I think it
extraneous information passed around contained in any auction. In order to means…” or “I’m taking it as…” If you
the room as some player announces a meet this goal, it is necessary that all cannot remember the partnership
strange outcome or contract; the need players understand and practice the agreement, say just that. The oppo-
to adjust scores and assign penalties principles of full disclosure and active nents may wish to call the director. If
when a table plays the boards out of or- ethics. Ethical bridge players will rec- you cannot remember discussing an
der and enters the second board in the ognize the obligation to give complete agreement in this bidding sequence,
first slot and sees results from other explanations. They will accept the fact simply say, “It’s undiscussed.” In this
tables for a board not yet played. that any such information is entirely situation, you are using your best
Clubs, however, may set their own for the benefit of the opponents, and bridge judgment to proceed and the
policy as to the use of these functions, may not be used to assist their own opponents must do the same. ◾
and ACBL would not interfere in cases partnership.”
The World Bridge Series in Orlando offers ACBL If you plan to play only in non-championship events, all
members a rare opportunity to play in world championship you need to do after that is show up and pay entry fees. If
events in North America. The World Bridge Federation you want to play in championship events, you’ll also need
hosts the 2018 World Bridge Series Sept. 22–Oct. 6 at the to register for those events, pay entry fees in advance and
Orlando World Center Marriott. complete a commitment form. Commitment forms can be
All the events are transnational, so that players from downloaded from the website and must be sent by email to
anywhere in the world can come together as teammates or anna.gudge@worldbridgefed.com by Sept. 6.
as partners to compete. Players in good standing with their Links to book room reservations, register for champi-
national bridge organizations are eligible to compete in any onship events and pay advance entry fees can be found at
of these events, provided, of course, they meet all the WBF championships.worldbridge.org.
eligibility requirements, including those relating to the ages
of Senior and Youth players. Entry fees
All ACBL members in the U.S. are considered members of Entry fees are a single all-inclusive price for all players
the U.S. Bridge Federation, the national bridge organization. and all sessions of an event. The WBF requests payment in
Canadian players must be members of the Canadian Bridge advance via bank transfer.
Federation. All that is required to play in non-championship
events in Orlando is to register as a player with the WBF. Rosenblum Open Teams: $1600 Women’s Pairs: $600
Anyone who has ever played in a WBF event is already regis- McConnell Women’s Teams: $1500 Senior Pairs: $600
tered. If you’re not sure whether you have registered, use the Rand Senior Teams: $1500 Mixed Pairs: $400
People Finder feature at worldbridge.org to find your name Mixed Teams: $1200 Other events: TBA
in the database. If it isn’t there, you need to register. Open Pairs: $700
How to register
Go to championships.worldbridge.org. The first step is to Schedule
click the link to register for a championship event, even if Starts Ends
Rosenblum Open Teams Sat., Sept. 22 Sun., Sept. 30
you don’t intend to play. From the registration information
page, in the first bullet, click registration email form. Youth World Triathlon Sat., Sept. 22 Thur., Sept. 27
McConnell Women’s Teams Sun., Sept. 23 Sun., Sept. 30
Rand Senior Teams Sun., Sept. 23 Sun., Sept. 30
Open Pairs World Championship Mon., Sept. 24 Sun., Sept. 30
Women’s Pairs World
Championship Tue., Sept. 25 Sun., Sept. 30
Senior Pairs World Championship Tue., Sept. 25 Sun., Sept. 30
Side Short Track Pairs Fri., Sept. 28 Fri., Sept. 28
Joan Gerard Cup Sat., Sept. 29 Sun., Sept. 30
Mixed Teams World Championship Mon., Oct. 1 Sat., Oct. 6
Seniors World Triathlon Mon., Oct. 1 Thur., Oct. 4
Side Pairs Tournament Mon., Oct. 1 Tue., Oct. 2
Mixed Pairs World
You will be prompted to save a compressed file. Next,
Championship Wed., Oct. 3 Sat., Oct. 6
you’ll need to find that file in your Downloads folder.
Open it and you’ll find the registration form in an Excel Side Teams Tournament Wed., Oct. 3 Thur., Oct. 4
spreadsheet. Complete the form, save it and send it by email IMP Pairs Fri., Oct. 5 Sat., Oct. 6
to webmaster@worldbridgefed.com. It can take up to two Several one- and two-day pairs and Swiss team events will be
days before you’re in the database and are able to register for added to the schedule and announced later.
events.
Brett Kunin and Frank Davis Sue Jaffe and Nora Robinson
Using Losing Trick Count (LTC) in justifies aggressive bidding, even with opening bid to make game. (7 + 6 = 13,
competitive auctions can make your minimum high-card strength. This which, subtracted from 24, is 11.)
bidding more accurate and give you an maxim has a direct correlation with Here is another 6–5 hand which was
edge. I have had a lot of success bidding LTC, as a 6–5 hand does not contain held in an IMP game by a robot partner
games in response to partner’s takeout more than eight losers under the LTC that could benefit from learning LTC!
doubles with surprisingly few high- formula, and thus similarly justifies ♠K 10 8 4 2 ♥J 9 6 5 4 3 ♦6 ♣J
card points. You can expect a takeout aggressive bidding with minimum
double, like an opening bid, to have no strength. Here is a 6–5 hand I held in a Robot’s LHO opened 1♣, and I, the
more than seven losers, occasionally pairs game: hapless partner, doubled. The next
eight. If partner doubles and you have player bid 2♣, and Robot bid 2♥.
♠K 2 ♥— ♦J 10 8 7 3 2 ♣Q J 8 4 2 Opener rebid 3♣ which was passed
seven or fewer losers with a fit, you
should be able to make a game. LHO opened 2♥ and partner over- around to Robot who bid 3♥, ending
Here is a hand that came up recently called 2NT, showing a strong notrump. the auction. The layout:
in a team game: RHO bid 3♥, and I had to decide what
to do. I knew we had a fit in at least one ♠AQ7
♠Q 10 8 7 5 3 ♥K Q ♦10 7 6 4 ♣5 of my suits, so I counted my losers and ♥ A Q 10 8
Left-hand opponent opened 1♦ and saw that my 7-point hand had only six ♦J932
partner doubled. RHO bid 1♥, and it losers. I expected that we could make ♣ 10 9
was up to me. Although I had only 7 a game in one of my suits, but I started
HCP, I had just seven losers. Partner with a bid of 4♦, hoping that I would ♠ K 10 8 4 2
should have at least three spades for have the opportunity to bid clubs later. ♥J96543
his double, so I knew we had a fit. What LHO bid 4♥, and when it was passed ♦6
should I do? back to me, I bid 5♣. Partner corrected ♣J
I jumped to 4♠ and saw this dummy: to 5♦ and a heart was led. This is what Not surprisingly, 3♥ made five.
I saw: Had you or I held the robot’s hand, we
♠KJ96
♥AJ84 ♠A865 would have reevaluated after partner’s
♦K2 ♥Q764 takeout double and thought seriously
♣ 10 6 3 ♦AQ9 about bidding game, as the hand has
♣A9 only seven losers. We might also have
♠ Q 10 8 7 5 3 considered that we undoubtedly had a
♥KQ ♠K2 double fit, that the form of scoring was
♦ 10 7 6 4 ♥— IMPs, and that partner’s cards rated to
♣5 ♦ J 10 8 7 3 2 be “working,” as they were positioned
♣QJ842 “behind” the opener. After considering
4♠ made easily, and we won 11 all of the factors, we would have confi-
IMPs, as my counterpart bid only 2♠. The ♦K was onside, and the ♣K dently pushed on to a major suit game
was offside. Diamonds broke 2–2 and and achieved a good score. ◾
“Six-five, come alive!” is an old clubs broke 3–3. Plus 620 was a good
Note: ACBL rules prohibit partnerships
bridge maxim popularized by the late score. Note that as minor-suit games from agreeing to open hands with fewer
Grant Baze. The basic idea is that the require 11 tricks, you generally need six than 8 HCP regardless of the number of
6–5 distribution is so powerful that it losers opposite a minimum seven-loser losers determined by LTC.
See the West and East hands that appear on pages 57 and 59 respectively, and try
bidding them with a regular partner. Compare how you performed with the expert pairs
whose auctions you can read about in this month’s column. The North–South players are
silent unless otherwise noted. The competitors were not informed of any interference by the
opponents before the bidding commenced. The form of scoring is matchpoints with a 12 top.
The Bridge Bulletin auctions are meant to portray possible bidding sequences to one of
the top-scoring contracts using common methods.
JoAnna and Lew Stansby and Sally Problem 1 Bridge Bulletin auction: (1NT)–Dbl–
and Kit Woolsey are two Bay Area North deals. None vulnerable. (Redbl)–Pass; (2♣)–2♥–(Pass)–2♠;
couples that need little introduction North opens 1NT (15–17). If doubled, (Pass)–4♠–All Pass. Thanks to Jon
to most of our readers. Both pairs have South redoubles to ask for suits up the Shuster of Gainesville FL for sending
played together for about 30 years, line, and North bids 2♣ if necessary. this hand from the Common Game.
while enjoying great success in other Not many pairs found spades.
partnerships as well. The Stansbys West East
have won six NABC titles together, ♠J9843 ♠AKQ Scores: 4♠ 11; 5♠ 8; 4♥ 5; 3♠ 5;
as well as a bronze medal in the 2006 ♥6 ♥ A K 10 9 5 4 3♥ 3; (2♣) Dbl 1
World Mixed Pairs. The Woolseys’ ♦ Q J 10 5 ♦K73 Stansbys 5, Woolseys 3
greatest success in partnership was ♣852 ♣7
their victory in the 2009 Grand Na- Problem 2
tional Teams. JoAnna North Lew South East deals. N–S vulnerable.
Some other notes: Lew is an ACBL (1NT) 4♥ (Pass)
Hall of Famer with one of the best Pass (Pass) West East
all-time track records for someone ♠Q62 ♠4
Sally North Kit South ♥ 10 7 ♥A8
not named Meckwell. He will also be
(1NT) 2♦ (Pass) ♦K765 ♦AQ9432
receiving the Lazard Sportsmanship
2♥ (Pass) 3♥ All Pass ♣AQJ9 ♣ K 10 5 2
Award at this year’s HOF ceremony in
Atlanta. Kit is a Hall of Famer as well, Both pairs use the Woolsey conven- JoAnna Lew
not only for his playing record, but tion over strong notrump openings, 1♦
also for his prolific writing. His classic so neither East had a penalty double 2♦ 2♠
works, “Matchpoints” and “Partnership available. A Woolsey 2♦ bid shows 2NT 3♠
Defense in Bridge” are considered the a major one-suiter, so the choice was 4♣ 4♥
bibles on these topics. JoAnna won the whether to invite game or just bid it. 5♣ 6♦
2010 “Best Bid Hand” award from the Lew decided his hand was too good to Pass
International Bridge Press Association. invite, so with no convenient way to
Both pairs play a strong club system, explore other strains, he just bid the Sally Kit
with some variation in their notrump heart game. Kit preferred to start with 1♦
openings depending on seat and vul- 2♦, virtually promising a six-card suit, 2♦ 3♠
nerability (the Woolseys play 10–12 and Sally’s 2♥ was “pass or correct”: 4♦ 4NT
not vulnerable in first and second). She clearly wanted to stop right there if 5♣ 6♣
Both pairs also use some relay methods his suit was hearts. Kit raised (“I have Pass
in game-forcing situations, where the to do something, but Sally might be
(usually) strong hand asks a series of broke”). Sally had an easy pass with her The opening 1♦ promised only two
questions with the cheapest bid, and short hearts and meager scraps. diamonds, so the ladies had a tough
the other hand “answers.” choice between a non-forcing 2NT
July 2018 Bridge Bulletin 37
with weak majors or the inverted showed 8–11 HCP with fewer than five chose the game-forcing 2♣ which they
raise (a game-forcing 2♣ was not in spades. The auction proceeded natu- play as an artificial asking bid. JoAnna
the picture, as both pairs open fairly rally through 4♣, and Lew’s 4♦ was showed six or more hearts with an-
light). Lew’s 2♠ promised four-plus RKCB for clubs. He signed off over the other four-card suit. After two further
diamonds with shortness somewhere. four key-card reply, suggesting a few relays, JoAnna showed 2=6=4=1 shape.
JoAnna asked with 2NT, and 3♠ holes, but JoAnna was sure she had Lew’s 4♦ was a “puppet” to 4♥, pre-
showed a stiff spade with fewer than him covered. paratory to signing off somewhere. He
four hearts. JoAnna cuebid the ♣A, Kit’s 1NT showed a game force with hoped for chunky hearts opposite.
and Lew, with a near-maximum opener clubs. 2♣ started a relay sequence, Kit also chose the game-forcing
in the big-club context, took over with with Kit’s next three bids showing, in route: “Too bad if we get too high, but
Roman key card Blackwood via 4♥. order, no second suit, 3=2=3=5 shape I have to do so with this hand.” 2♥
He bid slam opposite the two key-card and three controls (A=2, K=1). Sally’s promised six-plus hearts, and the rest
reply. 4♣ asked Kit to show the location of was natural. Sally later mentioned that
Kit’s 3♠ showed a singleton spade, his honors, and 4♦ showed either both she might’ve bid 2NT instead of 3♦,
four-plus diamonds and a good hand. or neither of the top clubs, so she knew “but a tough hand regardless.”
“Easy splinter here, Sally should be Kit held at least his actual hand (with
able to judge well.” 4♦ was forcing and five small clubs he’d have shown a bal- Bridge Bulletin auction: 1♥–2♣;
forward-going, and 4NT was a heart anced hand initially). Her 6NT was the 2♦–3♣; 3♥–4♥; Pass.
cuebid (4♥ would have been RKCB). “percentage action,” hoping to find a
Sally cuebid 5♣, and Kit, envisioning major-suit queen or the ♦J opposite. Scores: 3♣ 11; 4♣ 7; 2♥ 6; 3♥ 4;
the potential play issues, offered 6♣ as 3NT 3; 4♥, 5♣ 2
a place to play. Sally was on the same Bridge Bulletin auction: 1♥–1NT; Stansbys 18, Woolseys 24
page. Well judged by both. 3♦–3♥; 4♣–6♣; Pass
Problem 5
Bridge Bulletin auction: 1♦–2♦; Scores: 6♣ 10; 6NT 8; 5NT 5; North deals. N–S vulnerable.
3♣–4♣; 4♥–6♣; Pass. 4♥, 6♦ 4; 5♣, 6♥ 2
Stansbys 16, Woolseys 22 West East
Scores: 6♣ 11; 5♣ 8; 3NT(W), 5♦ 5; ♠ A Q J 10 9 4 ♠7
3NT(E) 2; 6♦ 1 Problem 4 ♥K ♥AQ87
Stansbys 6, Woolseys 14 West deals. Both vulnerable. ♦KQ ♦A632
♣9853 ♣ Q J 10 4
Problem 3 West East
South deals. E–W vulnerable. ♠K4 ♠A832 JoAnna Lew
♥AK9852 ♥J 1♦
West East ♦Q963 ♦5 1♠ 2♣
♠A ♠K95 ♣9 ♣AQ87532 2♥ 2♠
♥ A 10 7 6 4 ♥K2 2NT 3♥
♦AQ82 ♦K53 JoAnna Lew 3NT Pass
♣AJ6 ♣ Q 10 7 4 2 1♥ 2♣
2♠ 2NT Sally Kit
JoAnna Lew
3♦ 3♥ 1♦
1♣ 1♥
3♠ 4♦ 1♠ 2♣
2♥ 3♣
4♥ Pass 2♥ 3♥
3♦ 3♥
3♠ 3NT
4♣ 4♦ Sally Kit 4♣ 4♦
4♠ 5♣ 1♥ 2♣ 4♠ 5♣
6♣ Pass 2♥ 2♠ Pass
Sally Kit 3♦ 4♣
1♣ 1NT 4♥ Pass After the 1♦ opening (two-plus)
2♣ 2NT and natural response, our Easts never
A difficult decision from the outset rebid 1NT with a singleton spade, so
3♣ 3♦
for East, as focusing on clubs without the natural 2♣ encompasses vari-
3♥ 3NT
forcing to game risks losing the spade ous shapes. JoAnna’s 2♥ asked for
4♣ 4♦
suit (the Flannery proponents can be pattern, and 2♠ showed either four
6NT Pass
heard chuckling here). Lew had a natu- hearts without a spade void or three
Over the strong club, Lew’s 1♥ ral, invitational 3♣ bid available, but spades. After a further ask, 3♥ showed
38 Bridge Bulletin July 2018
1=4=4=4 shape, and JoAnna signed off Sally’s 2♣ showed a game force with if the ♥Q were the king,” said JoAnna.
in the best game. diamonds, and 2♦ initiated a relay se- Lew and Kit liked their hand for dia-
Kit’s 2♣ denied 1=4=5=3 shape (he’d quence. With her next three bids Sally monds, but there was no guarantee that
rebid 2♦ with that), which would showed heart shortness, then 3=1=6=3 partner even had four of them: Such
factor later in the auction. Sally’s 2♥ shape, then exactly three controls (not is the cost of the nebulous opening.
was fourth-suit forcing, and the auc- counting a singleton ♥K). 4♦ asked JoAnna liked her five-loser hand and
tion proceeded naturally. She chose about honor location, and 4♥ showed gave it one more try, after which Lew
to commit to a suit contract, knowing either both top diamonds or neither, came to life with a 4♦ invite. JoAnna
they had at least an eight-card club fit. leaving Kit at the crossroads: “I know couldn’t have much more, so she bid
Kit didn’t think Sally would bid 4♣ if Sally has at least game happily.
she could play spades opposite a low ♠A x x ♥x ♦J x x x x x ♣K x x. Kit had the luxury of knowing that
singleton, so he bid the club game. they wouldn’t end up in a seven-card fit
She might have a little more, but at this when he bid 2♦: “If Sally is 1=4=3=5,
Bridge Bulletin auction: 1♦–1♠; point 4♥ looks like the percentage
she’ll bid 2♥,” which Kit may well have
2♣–2♥; 3♥–3♠; 3NT–Pass. action.” One of the downsides to relay
passed at matchpoints. As it was, Sally
systems is “responder” rarely gets to
feared a possible misfit, so she passed
Scores: 4NT 10; 4♠, 5♣ 5 express an opinion. Here, West had
nice diamond fillers and the valuable to protect the plus score, a key in pairs.
Stansbys 28, Woolseys 29
♣Q, not enough to move over partner’s
Bridge Bulletin auction: 1♦–1♠;
Problem 6 signoff.
2♣–3♦; 5♦–Pass. Easier for East to
East deals. E–W vulnerable. invite facing known diamond length
Bridge Bulletin auction: 1♥–1NT;
3♣–3♦; 3♥–3♠; 4♦–6♦; Pass. and a standard-strength opening bid.
West East
♠A54 ♠K Scores: 5♦ 10; 4♦ 6; 1NT, 3♣ 4;
Scores: 6♦ 11; 6NT(E) 8; 5NT(E) 7;
♥3 ♥ A J 10 8 7 4 2NT, 4♣ 2; 3NT 1
5NT(W) 5; 4♥, 6NT(W) 3;
♦ J 10 9 8 6 2 ♦AQ Stansbys 41, Woolseys 38
5♦, 5♥, 7♦ 2; 6♥ 1
♣KQ5 ♣AJ94
Stansbys 31, Woolseys 32
Problem 8
JoAnna Lew West deals. None vulnerable.
1♣ Problem 7
1♥ 2♥ South deals. Both vulnerable.
West East
3♦ 3♥ ♠KJ7 ♠ A 10 6 5 4
West East
3NT 4♣ ♥AKQ98 ♥—
♠J ♠A643
4♦ 4♥ ♦QJ ♦ 10 9 8 6
♥Q5 ♥K86
Pass ♣Q95 ♣ A K J 10
♦AKQ93 ♦ J 10 5 2
Sally Kit ♣K9743 ♣Q6 JoAnna Lew
1♣ 1♣ 1♠
JoAnna Lew
2♣ 2♦ 1NT 2♦
1♦ 1♠
2NT 3♣ 2♥ 2♠
2♣ 2♦
3♥ 3♠ 2NT 3NT
3♣ 4♦
4♣ 4♦ Pass
5♦ Pass
4♥ Pass
Sally Kit
JoAnna’s 1♥ response to the strong Sally Kit 1♣ 1NT
club showed any 8- to 11-point hand 1♦ 1♠ 2♣ 2♥
with fewer than five spades. Four 2♣ 2♦ 2♠ 3♠
natural bids followed, and Lew went Pass 3NT 4♦
into the tank. He decided to bid on, 4♥ 4NT
After the 1♦ opening (two-plus) Pass
thinking that JoAnna might’ve bid 3♠
and normal response, our Wests had
with good spades and weak clubs, but
the option of jumping to 3♣ with at Lew’s 1♠ response to the strong club
would be forced to bid 3NT with the re-
least 5–5 in the minors, good suits, and was natural, promising five spades and
verse. JoAnna rebid her diamonds, but
strength just shy of an opening 1♣ bid. a game force. 1NT started a relay, and
Lew feared getting a poor matchpoint
Both felt they needed better clubs or a 2♦ showed exactly five spades, a side
result if he bypassed 4♥. JoAnna had
slightly stronger hand: “I’d have bid 3♣
nowhere to go. continued on pg. 50 ➤
July 2018 Bridge Bulletin 39
It’s Your Call
DIRECTOR: SUE MUNDAY ❘ SCORES: KAREN WALKER
In August, five teams of Juniors indeed, the prevalent Junior bidding with four hearts,
representing the U.S. will travel to philosophy: “There is no chance I’m but we might also
Wujiang, China, to compete in the 17th passing!” Looking down the road, he end up in a 4–2
World Youth Bridge Team Champion- sees good things. “I don’t exactly have a diamond fit.”
ships. spade stopper, but 10–8–x–x will likely 2NT by Dhir. “I
The teams won their berths at the do, and I will be very happy when part- can’t double be-
Michael Seamon Junior ner bids Stayman.” cause I’m in a di-
U.S. Bridge Championships, Zhou is concerned that the lemma if partner
hosted by the U.S. Bridge opponents might be stealing. doesn’t bid 3♥.
Arjun Dhir
Federation in December He bids 2NT. “With 16 HCP, Also, 10–8–x–x
(March 2018, pg. 24). An it’s too risky to pass in this rates to be a stopper if partner has any
invitation went out to the Ju- situation. We could be cold honor, which is pretty likely. I am bal-
nior squadron to sit in as this for a game – most likely 3NT anced with good controls.”
month’s It’s Your Call guest or 4♥. The only alternative Kriegel says 2NT keeps the auction
panel, and a dozen RSVPed to 2NT is a double, but we simple. “Hopefully the opponents can’t
in the affirmative. Don’t be are not well placed over a 3♦ run spades. My second choice is pass,
Arthur Zhou
misled by their age – these bid by partner. 2NT shows but I’m afraid that pass will end the
kids got game. our strength and distribution, and auction too often when partner has
Please meet: (from the USA1 under 10–8–x–x is good enough for a stopper. some scattered values and a doubleton
26 team) Zach Grossack, Oren Kriegel If partner has ♠x x, the suit is likely spade.”
and Kevin Rosenberg; (from the USA2 blocked (third hand probably doesn’t Rosenberg is pro-2NT. “Seems like
under 26 team) Arjun Dhir and William have ♠A K Q J x x), and partner could the best description of my hand, and
Zhu; (from the under 26 women’s team) conceivably have a spade honor. There my spade suit is likely to be a stopper.
Lucy Zhang; (from the under 21 team) is no risk of missing 4♥, because with Passing is a little too likely to miss
Richard Jeng, Cornelius Duffie and four or more hearts, partner a game, which is scary at
Brent Xiao; and (from the under 16 can bid Stayman or transfer.” this vulnerability and form
team) Michael Xu, Jonathan Yue and Duffie calls 2NT an of scoring. Doubling is the
Arthur Zhou. excellent description of his other option, but just doesn’t
strength and shape. “We seem very attractive. (The
1. IMPs. North–South vulnerable. can still find our heart fit if winning situation is when
♠10 8 6 3 ♥A Q J 9 ♦A 3 ♣K Q 7 partner has values. I’ll even partner bids 3♣ showing a
have a stopper if partner has good hand, and we get to 5♣
West North East South a stiff spade honor or, for when I bid 3♠ and partner
Pass Pass 2♠ ? example, if partner has: avoids 3NT, whereas if I’d
Kevin Rosenberg
♠7 2 ♥ K 3 2 ♦8 5 4 2 ♣A J 5 2, overcalled 2NT, then partner
Call Votes Award would just raise.) Still, there are lots of
2NT 7 100 and right-hand opponent has a stiff cases where 2NT just works better.”
Dbl 5 90 spade honor. In this case, spades are Xu is on the fence. “2NT or double.
Pass 0 40 blocked and we may well be able to Partner is extremely likely to have a
take our nine tricks. I think pass too spade honor, meaning my 10 would
No passing lane often leads to losing 11 IMPs when be a stopper. I am not terribly fond
Despite the lack of a clearly defined they are down one or two against our of my doubleton ♦A and my lack of
spade stopper, the consensus choice is making game. Doubling might get us quick tricks, so I agree with double,
2NT. to a better partscore if partner is weak
Xiao summarizes his position –
40 Bridge Bulletin July 2018
too. I guess it would just depend on my three-card spade
mood.” Call Votes Award suit, I will be very
The spade stopper – or lack thereof 2♥ 3 100 supportive of
– is a deal breaker for a handful of 3♣ 3 100 whatever partner
Juniors. Dbl 3 60 bids.”
Grossack likes double. “Very close 3♦ 2 60 Duffie bids 3♣,
to 2NT, but feel like that could be very 4♣ 1 50 “even though
bad. I don’t want to guess who holds Pass 0 30 it’s probably an
the missing spade length. For now, I underbid. I think
double and try to learn more and get Recharge pass is wrong Cornelius Duffie
to the best contract. Can’t pass red at Rosenberg chooses 2♥, calling with a void in dia-
IMPs.” double risky. “Partner might interpret monds; even if my partner doubles this,
Zhang doubles. “We risk game by double as a contextual penalty since we I’m not going to leave it in, and I could
passing if partner has a good 8-count, already tried to penalize the oppo- have a much worse hand:
and 2NT wrongsides the contract nents. Some might say 2♥ is also risky
because partner could conceivably in- (♠x x ♥K Q J 9 8 ♦Q J x ♣x x x).
when partner has ♠K x or similar. I’ll
raise 3♥ to four, 2NT to three and try terpret it as natural, but I think if part- I don’t see many other alternatives.
3NT over a constructive 3♦.” ner passes, they get what they deserve. I’m not bidding spades with only three,
“Double,” says Jeng. “While 2NT Plus I might make it. That being said, and I’m not bidding notrump with this
does get our strength across, we lack a I think 2♥ should be a forward-going shape. I could try 2♥, but I don’t really
spade stopper. If partner has an honor, cuebid, which is what I have. My next know what it means. I could try 4♣,
we potentially do have move, assuming partner bids the likely but I don’t want to bypass 3NT.”
a double stopper, but 2♠ or 2NT, is to bid 3♣ and see Zhou, 3♣: “It looks like the oppo-
there is a lack of tricks. what partner has to say.” nents have stumbled into at least an
Over an expected three- Grossack’s 2♥: “Cuebid the eight-card fit, so 2♦ doubled doesn’t
of-a-minor response, I’ll opponents’ suit. Could be a little rate to be set more than one. Game is
probe for 3NT with 3♠, scary if partner thinks it is to play, certainly possible for our side, but a
while I will just pass any but that is unlikely. I want to try partscore in clubs could also be the
lebensohl response. If to get to the best game. Won’t limit. Bidding 3♣ still puts 3NT in the
partner has any positive sit for any sort of penalty double picture, but allows partner to pass with
heart response, I have with a void.” a minimum.”
an easy raise to game.” Xiao bids 2♥. “Partner looks to 3♣ by Zhu. “It’s unclear if we are in a
Zach Grossack
Yue doubles. “At this have a strong hand and I defi- forcing auction. It’s very likely partner
form of scoring and vulnerability, game nitely want to be in game, but if partner has at least three clubs, and the op-
seems extremely attractive. Because had opening values, 3♣ may be passed. ponents probably have nine diamonds
we are playing lebensohl, doubling I also wouldn’t be surprised if partner together. Partner passed over 1NT, so
offers the best chance of game and also bids spades afterwards, so with my he’s limited. 3♣ should be making,
great versatility.”
Zhu thinks double offers the best
chance to get to the right game. “Even a
Panel’s answers
minor partial could be good. Pass might 1 2 3 4 5 Total
sometimes win IMPs. 2NT might get Arjun Dhir 2NT Dbl 1NT 3♥ 4♠ 420
us playing notrump when it’s wrong.” Cornelius Duffie 2NT 3♣ 1NT 3♦ 4♠ 490
Zach Grossack Dbl 2♥ 2♥ 3♦ 4♠ 460
2. IMPs. Both vulnerable. Richard Jeng Dbl 3♦ 1NT 2♦ 4♠ 410
♠A J 9 ♥A Q 10 6 3 ♦— ♣Q 10 7 6 4 Oren Kriegel 2NT 4♣ 2♥ 2♣ 2♠ 370
West North East South Kevin Rosenberg 2NT 2♥ 1NT 2♣ 3♠ 480
1♥ Pass Brent Xiao 2NT 2♥ 1NT 2♣ 3♠ 480
Pass Dbl Pass Pass Michael Xu 2NT 3♦ 2♥ 3♦ 3♠ 440
1NT Pass 2♦ ? Jonathan Yue Dbl Dbl 4♠ 3♦ 3♠ 400
Lucy Zhang Dbl Dbl 2♥ 2♣ 4♠ 400
Arthur Zhou 2NT 3♣ 1NT 3♦ 3♠ 500
William Zhu Dbl 3♣ 4♥ 3♦ 3♠ 420
Let’s continue with the theme that As I mentioned last month, if you The other problem is similar – just
we began last month. You cannot get really want to elevate your game many remember to count the high-card
too much practice. floors, keep a constant track of the points.
high-card points. In this problem (and
Dlr: West ♠ 10 8 7 the one that follows), the auctions be- Dlr: West ♠ Q 10 9 4
Vul: Both ♥ 9 6 5 gin with three passes. In a newspaper Vul: E–W ♥ K J 10 9
♦AK column or teaching deal, this is always ♦A2
♣K7432 going to provide the key clue to finding ♣ 10 4 3
the winning play. ♠852 ♠7
♠AKQJ This is the full deal: ♥?5 ♥?8632
♥8742 ♦9743 ♦865
♦J9 ♠ 10 8 7 ♣AKQ6 ♣8752
♣Q65 ♥965 ♠AKJ63
♦AK ♥74
West North East South ♣K7432 ♦ K Q J 10
Pass Pass Pass 1♣ ♠643 ♠952 ♣J9
Pass 3♣ All Pass ♥ J 10 3 ♥AKQ
♦ Q 10 6 5 2 ♦8743 West North East South
3♣ is a limit raise, showing a maxi- ♣A8 ♣ J 10 9 Pass Pass Pass 1♠
mum pass with five-plus clubs. ♠AKQJ Pass 3♠ Pass 4♠
West leads the ♥J. East wins with ♥8742 All Pass
the ♥Q, cashes the ♥A and ♥K (ev- ♦J9
eryone following), then he shifts to a ♣Q65 West leads the three top clubs
spade. How would you continue? against 4♠. You ruff the third, draw
You can afford one club loser but not trumps and cash your four diamond
two. This requires finding an opponent tricks, discarding two hearts from the
with ace-doubleton. But which oppo- board. Then, with your contract on the
Upcoming nent is more likely to have that trump line, you lead a low heart, West playing
Better holding? low smoothly. Do you finesse dummy’s
Bridge Remember the bidding and count the
points. East is known to have 9 points
jack or go up with the king? Why?
West had 9 points in clubs. If he also
Teacher in hearts, but he didn’t open the bid- had the ♥A, he would have opened the
Accreditation ding. So he cannot have the ♣A. This bidding. So call for the jack. ◾
Program signposts the right route. At trick five,
lead a low club to dummy’s king. When
Austin TX (ABA National)
it wins, as you knew it would, return a
July 25–26
low club and play low from your hand.
Lois Francis
When West’s ace appears, consider it
nurnlo44@gmail.com
no more than your just deserts.
(718) 308–1067
We learn early to count our losers in driving out the ♦A, West gets in to At first glance, it appears that a heart
a suit contract. Equally important is continue leading hearts, making our finesse is the best solution to make the
determining whether those losers are heart loser a fast loser that the defend- contract. If the finesse loses, dummy’s
fast losers or slow losers. This knowl- ers can cash when East wins the ♦A. ♥Q will become good and we can dis-
edge can affect declarer’s choice of Our plan is to win the opening lead card our diamond loser on it. Working
which suit to play first. and attack diamonds immediately, but on hearts is a good idea, but the finesse
there is one more concern: entries. isn’t! If we finesse and lose to West’s
Dlr: South ♠ 9 7 4 2 Once the ♥K is gone, we have no fast ♥K, we must unblock our ♥A before
Vul: Both ♥ K 5 3 entry to dummy to reach the third dia- we can discard on dummy’s ♥Q. The
♦QJ6 mond. Following the practice of play- defenders will have knocked out both
♣J74 ing the high card from the short side the ♦A and ♦K, making our diamond
♠AK ♠6 first in diamonds will help the situa- loser fast, and we are left with no way
♥ Q J 10 8 ♥972 tion, but what if East waits until the to get to dummy in time to discard it.
♦9742 ♦ A 10 8 5 second diamond lead to win the ace? Trying reach dummy with a spade lets
♣985 ♣ Q 10 6 3 2 We will need a dummy entry outside of East–West in to cash their diamond
♠ Q J 10 8 5 3 diamonds. What is it? trick.
♥A64 We must win the ♥A at trick one Look at how much easier reaching
♦K3 and save the ♥K for that entry so we dummy is if we spurn the heart finesse
♣AK can discard our third heart, which has and promote the ♥Q by simply play-
What is South’s plan in 4♠ after become a hot-potato fast loser. Only ing the ♥A followed by the ♥J. Now
West leads the ♥Q? then can we draw trump. that we’ve unblocked the heart suit,
We have four losers. The defenders our second high diamond is the needed
Dlr: North ♠ Q 8 6 5 dummy entry to take the discard. Once
can cash the ♠A K and ♦A whenever Vul: E–W ♥ Q 6 5
they get the lead, so these are fast los- that’s done, declarer can safely draw
♦AK52 trump. Before taking a finesse, look
ers. The heart loser is slow for the mo- ♣63
ment, but slow losers can become fast for a better alternative. Relying on the
♠A2 ♠94 heart finesse gives us a 50% chance to
losers once declarer’s winners in the ♥K982 ♥ 10 7 4 3
suit are gone. West’s lead has made the make 3♠. Simply promoting a heart
♦ Q J 10 9 ♦64 trick gives us a much better chance.
slow heart loser only one loss of lead ♣974 ♣AK852
away from becoming a fast loser. One Both opponents will hold at least
♠ K J 10 7 3 three hearts about 80% of the time, but
loser must be eliminated. ♥AJ
Notice the lopsided diamond suit, all you have to know is that, lacking
♦873 other information, playing for the most
with dummy having three cards while ♣ Q J 10
declarer has only two. We can drive likely split of a suit is better than tak-
out the ♦A to promote two diamond What is South’s plan as declarer in ing a finesse.
tricks. A loser can be discarded on 3♠ after West leads the ♦Q? Making a contract often requires us
dummy’s third diamond, and that dis- We count three fast losers – the to work to set up winners in dummy to
card must be the heart loser since the ♣A K and ♠A – and two slow losers provide a place to discard losers. When
other three losers are unavoidable. – one in each red suit. Again, one loser doing this work, we have to consider
If we play even one trump before must be eliminated. fast and slow losers, entries and timing.
I’ve spent the last few months in this North South The first hand has only 6 HCP and
column talking about the essential two 1♠ 4–3–3–3 shape, while the second hand
questions we should always ask our- 2♠ ? is much stronger – 8 HCP and 5–3–3–2
selves in every auction: 1) Do we have a shape. Yet game is much better op-
game? and 2) Do we have a major-suit Game looks good, so you bid 4♠. posite the first hand, because its cards
fit? Each question can have a yes, no, When you’re not sure of the answer, are in the right place. But if you invite
or maybe answer, and we’ve looked you need to consult with partner. That with 3♠, responder will certainly pass
generally at what to do when we have usually means making an invitational with the first hand and accept with the
each type of answer. bid. second, exactly the opposite of what
The real beauty of the two questions ♠A Q 9 5 3 ♥K 4 ♦5 ♣A Q 10 8 4 you want her to do.
is that once we have a yes answer to North South How can responder know which
one of them, the focus of the remainder 1♠ hand is more valuable? We need
of the auction shifts to answering the 2♠ ? to make a more descriptive invita-
other. After a game-forcing 2/1 bid, we tion, one that focuses on shape over
have a yes answer to question No. 1 – You have 15 high-card points op- strength. Rather than 3♠, opener
Do we have a game? We can then shift posite partner’s single raise, which is should invite with 3♣. Because we
our focus to finding a fit. Similarly, about 6–10 HCP. Game is certainly have agreed spades, this cannot be a
once we find a major-suit fit, the rest of possible, especially given your excel- bid intended to determine strain – it
the auction is all about level. lent shape. But it’s far from certain. must be about level.
Say the auction starts 1♠–2♠. We There are a lot of hands partner could In other words, having set spades as
have a spade fit and a yes answer to have where game is excellent, and a lot trumps, no bid for the rest of the auc-
question No. 2. Hooray! Now the focus of hands she could have where game tion is trying to find a trump suit. So
shifts to question No. 1: Do we have a would be very poor. You’re not willing 3♣ does not suggest playing in clubs;
game? We know the final contract will to give up on game or to force to game we know we’re playing spades. Specifi-
be in spades; the only question is how yourself – you want to invite. cally, it is a natural game try. Opener is
high – 2♠, 3♠, 4♠, 6♠? Every bid we You could simply bid 3♠, a straight- saying he thinks there might be a game
make from this point out is now about forward invitation, to solicit partner’s and describing more about his hand
answering that question: how high? opinion. The problem is that partner is – namely a secondary club suit – so
When you know the answer, you going to base her decision primarily on responder can better evaluate how well
know the right final contract and you how strong her hand is – is she closer her hand fits.
bid it. Easy. to the 6 HCP minimum or the 10 HCP The key is that once we have set a
♠A Q 9 5 3 ♥K 8 4 ♦J 9 4 ♣K 4 maximum? How many points partner major suit as trumps, all subsequent
has isn’t the only issue – it’s also where bids are about determining how high
North South those points are. Consider these two we belong in that major. With one job
1♠ hands: accomplished (we have a yes answer to
2♠ ? ♠K 8 4 2 ♥9 5 2 ♦9 7 3 ♣K 9 3 question No. 2), we focus all our atten-
tion on the other issue: question
No chance of game; you pass. ♠8 4 2 ♥Q 2 ♦K Q J 4 2 ♣6 3 2 No. 1 – do we have a game? ◾
♠A Q 9 5 3 ♥K Q 4 ♦A J 4 ♣K 4
Startup Bridge
BY LYNN BERG lberg@cfl.rr.com
I’m convinced that teaching bridge ⦁ Don’t be tempted to stray too soon topic, at least, you are the “fearless
has helped me become a better player. I to sexier topics like slam bidding; leader.” You may like to outline the
didn’t take classes when I started play- start with day-to-day bridge issues material or prepare handouts.
ing bridge in 1960 – I was in college like Stayman and transfers, major-
⦁ If you are not using a textbook, you
and learned at the table. A decade later, and minor-suit raises or doubles
should be able to find some exercis-
I wanted to help a small-town club to and overcalls.
es and quizzes online. ACBL has an
grow, so I looked for a book and started
⦁ If you are working on specific interactive program on basic bid-
teaching a basic bidding class. I quickly
conventions, look at ACBL’s ding which is a good source (Click
found out how much I didn’t know:
Bridge Series “Commonly Used on Learn on the ACBL webpage).
I had no coherent, clear ideas about
Conventions in the 21st Century” Most of the top bridge writers also
the game, and I quickly had to acquire
texts, any of Barbara Seagram’s “25” have quizzes and hands for a multi-
information and structure. I did have
series, and Conventional Wisdom tude of topics.
teaching experience (English lit on the
on the ACBL website. Be careful
university level), which helped. ⦁ If your club uses hand records, all
if you use Google that you aren’t
If you and your partner do not have of you should be looking for hands
accessing a British website – their
the luxury of living in an area with which deal with your topic. Bor-
bidding is quite different from the
an active club that encourages and row a few boards and make up half
Western Hemisphere’s. You’ll find
teaches newcomers, you may have to a dozen hands to practice with.
great information on websites for
teach yourselves. You will find, as I did, Again, the leader for this particu-
Larry Cohen, Eddie Kantar, Mike
that teaching someone else will teach lar topic should have looked at the
Lawrence and Richard Pavlicek,
you even more. Whether it is just the hands and be prepared to talk about
among others.
two of you or a larger study group, here the application of ideas.
are some tips to help you get started. ⦁ Get together and plan a schedule
⦁ Is there a more experienced player
a week or two before you actually
⦁ Make sure that the material you use in your club who has played your
meet. That gives everyone time to
isn’t too complicated or advanced example hands? Consult her about
get the study materials and agree on
for your current needs. ACBL’s what methods she and her partner
the topics. The first presenter also
“Bidding in the 21st Century,” used to be successful. Perhaps have
needs some time to prepare.
Audrey Grant’s “Better Bridge,” and a guest speaker.
Jim Ricker’s “Basic Bidding with ⦁ Whatever topic you choose to start
Too many bridge players are passive;
2/1” are all good places to start. You with, plan to spend some time on it.
they don’t really work at understand-
can review any of these online to Begin with a basic presentation. If
ing bridge more clearly and thoroughly.
decide where to start. The “Easy- you have a textbook, it will contain
As you take turns, you will discover
bridge!” first volume would also exercises which you should work
that having an organized, systematic
give you a good idea of which ideas through. If you are the presenter for
look at bridge problems is a great way
and conventions you should look the topic, give yourself time to read
to improve your skills. The challenge
at first. Baron Barclay has useful ahead and feel you have a grasp
of teaching someone else should also
descriptions of most bridge books. of the material before you work
give you a new appreciation of teachers
with your partner/group. For this
you’ve had! ◾
Bidding Basics
BY LARRY COHEN larryco.com
When partner preempts on the three If you respond in a new suit, it is preempt to make things more difficult
level, expect a seven-card suit. On the forcing one round (unless your re- for the opponents:
four level, an eight-card suit. Partner sponse happens to be a bid of game, ♠K 3 2 ♥2 ♦J 10 7 6 5 ♣10 8 7 6
has a weak hand (less than opening bid such as 4♣–Pass–4♠). This new-suit
strength), typically with most of his response is rare, but here are some Raise partner’s 3♠ to 4♠ whether or
points in his long suit. If vulnerable, examples: not RHO has acted.
expect a sounder preempt. ♠A Q J 8 7 6 5 ♥3 2 ♦A J 3 2 ♣— ♠— ♥J 7 6 ♦A 7 6 5 4 2 ♣Q 7 6 5
Given these parameters, game is Raise partner’s 3♥ to 4♥ whether or
unlikely. If you respond 3NT to a three- Respond 3♠ to partner’s 3♥.
not RHO has acted.
level preempt, you are not asking part- ♠2 ♥A K Q J 10 7 6 ♦2 ♣A K 3 2
ner’s opinion; you are saying you want ♠Q 7 6 5 4 ♥3 ♦Q 7 6 5 ♣5 3 2
Respond 4♥ to partner’s 4♦.
to play there. Such a bid is rare. You Raise partner’s 3♦ to 5♦. (If vulner-
would need close to nine tricks in your With many good hands, you will pass able, maybe only to 4♦.)
own hand and all suits stopped. Here partner’s preempt. Without a fit and
are some possible 3NT responses: without expectation of making a game,
♠5 ♥K 2 ♦A K Q J 8 7 6 ♣A J 2 just pass. For example: BIDDING BASICS QUIZ
Respond 3NT to 3♠ by partner. ♠A Q 7 6 5 ♥— ♦A 6 5 4 ♣Q 8 7 6
For the first four questions, nobody
♠K Q J ♥— ♦K Q 10 9 ♣A Q J 10 9 8 Pass partner’s opening 3♥ and hope is vulnerable, and partner deals and
Respond 3NT to 3♥. for the best. opens 3♥. What is your response?
Also, if you have stoppers and some ♠2 ♥K Q 8 2 ♦K Q 6 5 ♣K J 10 2 1. ♠A Q 7 6 5 ♥6 ♦A Q 7 ♣Q 7 3 2
honors suggesting parter’s suit will Pass partner’s opening 3♠. (If you
run, bid 3NT: 2. ♠4 ♥Q 3 2 ♦K Q J 8 2 ♣J 10 8 2
bid 3NT and go down five, you’ll never
♠K 4 ♥A Q 7 ♦A J 2 ♣ Q J 8 3 2 try that again.) 3. ♠A 2 ♥A ♦A J 10 8 7 6 ♣K Q 4 2
Ask Jerry
BY JERRY HELMS askjerry@jerryhelms.com jerryhelms.com
Matchpoints, North-South vulner- Partner takes the ♣A, declarer drop- with the ♥Q 9 over declarer, and
able. Sitting West, you hold: ping the king. This is a fine start. East these are both winners now. Partner’s
♠A J 10 8 5 ♥Q 9 7 5 ♦Q 5 3 ♣3, then returns the ♦9. Declarer mulls club lead put declarer in a bad spot. If
for a moment and wins with the king. declarer ruffed low, you would overruff
and you hear this sequence: What do you make of this? with the 9. If he ruffed with the jack or
West North East South East’s diamond return tells you 10, you would simply discard and that
1♣ 1♥ something important: It tells you that would give you a second trump winner.
1♠ Pass 2♣ 3♥ your partner doesn’t have a singleton This play is known as a trump promo-
? spade. Surely he would have returned tion, a defensive ploy that can create
that instead of a diamond. tricks out of nowhere.
Note that 1♠ promises five or more After South takes the ♦K, he leads The final score is down two for 500
spades. the ♥A K, your partner having a and an excellent result.
You have a fair hand and are faced singleton 2. This marks declarer with
with some noise from South. Should the ♥A K J 10 6 4 3. What do you think ♠KQ73
you go quietly or should you act? partner has over there? ♥8
Facing a partner who could open, You know he has seven clubs to the ♦J742
it’s right to double. It is said that if the A–Q because the only missing points ♣J762
opponents never make a doubled con- are the ♣Q and the ♦A. Partner needs ♠ A J 10 8 5 ♠92
tract, you don’t double enough, but this all of these to have an opening bid. And ♥Q975 ♥2
hand has so many plusses that dou- it isn’t much of an opening bid at that. ♦Q53 ♦ A 10 9
bling is surely acceptable. You have an On the next trick declarer leads the ♣3 ♣ A Q 10 9 8 5 4
ace. You have four trumps to the queen, ♠4. How do you defend? ♠64
and you have the ♥9, too. If your part- You are sure your partner doesn’t ♥ A K J 10 6 4 3
ner has as little as the ♥10, you have have a singleton spade. But declarer ♦K86
two trump tricks. You have a potential might. Take the ♠A. Your partner ♣K
trick in the ♦Q. And the opponents plays the 9. You know he doesn’t have
are vulnerable. If you can set them one, one spade, so when he plays the 9, Postmortem
your score is 200 instead of 100, and a high one, it is the start of an echo, Some notes on the bidding. First,
that rates to be a big deal. showing a doubleton. East opened his 10-point hand. He
Partner passes, and you lead the ♣3. Now you know everything. Your has two aces and a terrific suit. Pass-
This what you see: partner has two spades, one heart, and ing is conservative. Note that East
you know declarer has one club and didn’t open 3♣. Second, East sat for
♠KQ73 three diamonds. So you can play the West’s double. Those two aces are good
♥8 ♦Q, knowing it will win. Next, play a defensive values. Finally, South was
♦J742 diamond to partner’s ace, which wins, too optimistic with his 3♥ bid. The
♣J762 as you knew it would. singleton ♣K is a warning sign. More
♠ A J 10 8 5 Partner now leads the ♣Q, declarer values in diamonds would be preferred.
♥Q975 ruffing with the jack. And you?
♦Q53 ◾
Let the jack win. This leaves you
♣3
Chalk Talk
BY EDDIE KANTAR kantarbridge.com
Test your bidding smarts as South in You hold: ❹ 2♣. Using the fourth suit to create
this five-question quiz.
❺
a force when the hand cannot be
♠K 2 ♥10 8 ♦A Q J 10 5 3 ♣K J 10.
You hold: conveniently limited. A jump to 3♦
❶ North South is not forcing, and bidding 3NT is
♠8 4 3 ♥K J 10 4 3 ♦A 5 ♣8 7 4. 1♦ off the wall. After the fourth suit,
North South 1♠ 2♦ partner usually bids notrump with
2♣ 2♥ 2♥ ? a stopper in that suit. The bid of
3♥ ? the fourth suit has nothing to do
You rebid 2♦ because your hand is with your holding in that suit. It is
2♣ is strong and artificial, and 2♥ is not quite strong enough to rebid 3♦. simply a convenient way to force
a positive response, but not promising 2♥ is forcing. partner to bid again and further de-
two of the top three honors, as many scribe her hand, particularly after
play. It just shows a decent-quality The way I see it: you’ve made a one-level response.
suit, five cards or longer.
❶ 4♦. Show your partner the dia-
❷ You hold: mond control. It might be just what ❺ 3NT. A 2NT rebid would show a
the doctor ordered. minimum opener, typically 12–14
♠4 ♥A 10 5 ♦A K 3 ♣A Q 7 4 3 2. HCP with at least one club stopper.
North South ❷ 2♦. A “fake reverse,” forcing part- Your hand is too strong to make a
1♣ ner to bid again. Next, you will sup- discouraging rebid. (The strong six-
1♥ ? port hearts and give your partner card diamond suit, not to mention
a good idea of a strong hand which the two stray 10s, makes this hand
❸ You hold: stronger than 14 points.) Some
should include a singleton spade.
♠K 4 ♥A Q J 7 ♦9 4 ♣A K J 5 4. An original jump to 3♣ is not forc- would open the hand 1NT to avoid
North South ing and does not describe your hand awkward rebidding problems.
1♠ 2♣ at all.
2♠ 3♥
4♠ ? ❸ 5♠. A raise to the five level of the Rating Scale
last bid major in a sequence where
❹ You hold: three suits have been bid asks
4–5 correct:
♠A 10 4 ♥A J 4 3 2 ♦A 7 5 ♣9 3. partner to bid slam with a control
You are a good bidder.
North South in the unbid suit, diamonds in this
1♦ 1♥ case. Partner passes, lacking a first-
2–3 correct:
1♠ ? or second-round diamond control,
It could be worse.
bids 5NT with the guarded ♦K
allowing the hand to be played in
Less:
6NT from the right side, trots out
It is worse. Much worse.
6♦ with the ♦A, and bids 6♠ with
a singleton diamond.
Boehm on Bridge
BY AUGUST BOEHM
G is for guarding
Brilliancy
During a home international match, When I inquire about the lead, East ♠ A K J 10 8
I pick up: explains that it is “attitude,” indicat- ♥8765
ing that West likes the suit. With eight ♦ J 10 7
♠Q43 tricks assured, my only chance of a ♣9
♥ A 10 ninth lies with the club suit. I could ♠5 ♠9762
♦K6 take the finesse (or pay homage to the ♥QJ43 ♥K92
♣AQJ753 Rabbi by laying down the ace), but the ♦AQ9852 ♦43
Only the opponents are vulnerable, bidding suggests that the finesse is ♣K2 ♣ 10 8 6 4
and after two passes, I open 1♣. When likely to be wrong. I put up dummy’s ♠Q43
West overcalls 1♦, my partner bids ♦10 and East follows with the 4. ♥ A 10
1♠, promising a five-card suit. I rebid There is no rush to decide what to do ♦K6
1NT, which in this position shows in clubs, so I take five rounds of spades, ♣AQJ753
around 15–16. When West comes discarding two clubs from my hand.
again with 2♦, my partner doubles. I West follows once and then throws the Postmortem
imagine he has four hearts, but all I can ♣2, followed by the ♥3 4 and the ♦5, You will recall that I had considered
do for the moment is bid 2♠. When while East pitches the ♥2. the possibility of playing West for a
partner continues with 3♦, I must It looks to me as if West started singleton ♣K. It did not occur to me
choose which game to bid. Not wanting with a 1–3–6–3 distribution including that the king might have started life as
to expose my ♦K to an early attack, I the♣K. Backing my judgment, I play a doubleton. The only clue was East’s
opt for 3NT, giving us this auction: a heart to the ace and am pleased to discard of the ♥2, suggesting an odd
see West follow with the queen. I exit number of cards in the suit.
West North East South with the ♦K, and West wins with the At the other table, West, unwilling
Pass Pass 1♣ ace and cashes three more tricks in the to surrender a diamond, led the ♥J,
1♦ 1♠ Pass 1NT suit. I lean forward to reveal my ♣A Q, and declarer won with the ace, played
2♦ Dbl Pass 2♠ and West nods appreciatively before a spade to the ace and a club to the
Pass 3♦ Pass 3NT producing the ♥J. jack. West won and continued with the
All Pass I take West’s ♣K at trick 13 but am three of hearts, East winning with the
down one. With murder in my heart, I king, cashing the nine and then switch-
West leads the ♦2 and I see that
congratulate West on his far-sighted ing to a diamond, which gave the de-
dummy has nothing to spare:
defense of blanking the ♣K at trick fenders six tricks, down two, plus 100.
♠ A K J 10 8 three. Alas, we were making 4♠. ◾
♥8765 The full deal:
♦ J 10 7
♣9
♠Q43
♥ A 10
♦K6
♣AQJ753
Here is the example from last month. the ♣A, you’d be cut off from the ♠ K J 10 4
You are in 4♠: dummy. ♥5432
How will you continue? ♦KJ
♠ K J 10 4 ❻ ♣AK3
♥5432 Pull trumps, cash two diamonds,
then finish running trumps. ♠6 ♠873
♦KJ ♥AK87 ♥96
♣AK3 If West started with five clubs, when ♦ 10 4 3 ♦Q87652
you lead your last trump at trick 11, ♣Q9874 ♣ J 10
♠AQ952 here will be the end position: ♠AQ952
♥ Q J 10 ♥ Q J 10
♦A9 ♠— ♦A9
♣652 ♥5 ♣652
♦—
Tricks 1-2: West led ♥A K. East played ♣A3
the 9, then the 6. Ready for another one? In example 2,
♠— ♠— you’re in 7NT and the ♥10 is led:
Trick 3: West led a heart and East ♥8 ♥—
ruffed. ♦— ♦Q8 ♠K74
Trick 4: East led the ♣J and you won ♣Q9 ♣ 10 ♥KQ
with dummy’s king. ♠9 ♦ A K Q 10
♥— ♣KQ74
Tricks 5-6: You drew trump. East be- ♦—
gan with three. ♣65 ♠AQ62
Here are the answers to the ques- ♥A2
tions from last month: West is squeezed! If he discards ♦J975
his ♥8, you’ll keep dummy’s ♥5. He ♣A65
❶ Is there any legitimate chance to probably will choose to discard the ♣9.
make your contract? Once he keeps the ♥8, you know that There are 12 sure winners: three
Yes! dummy’s ♥5 is worthless, so you will spades, two hearts, four diamonds and
❷ What are you hoping for with the discard it. East’s discard is irrelevant. three clubs.
distribution of E–W cards? At trick 12, you’ll lead a club, and will If either spades or clubs split 3–3,
West began with five (or six) clubs. be delighted to win the last trick and you have 13 tricks.
make your contract.
❸ Which suits are irrelevant? Do note that when you ran your Question 1: If neither black suit divides
Spades and diamonds. trump, you did not have to keep track 3–3, and E–W defend perfectly, is it
❹ Which suits are relevant? of every E–W discard. All you had to possible to make 7NT? If yes, what are
Hearts and clubs. notice is whether West ever discarded you hoping for?
❺ Which suit must you not touch his ♥8. Question 2: How will you play?
(until trick 12)? Question 3: When you run diamonds,
Clubs. You must cash diamonds Here is the complete deal: which discards must you note? ◾
and trumps, so if you also cashed
Even better
This deal was played and reported to returned the ♥9, his highest – which is
me by David Berkowitz in the finals of surely suit preference for the highest-
the 2017 Blue Ribbon Pairs. David was ranking side suit. He must be void in West hands for the
declarer, but I ask you to take the West diamonds. In fact, this was the Real July Bidding Box
hand on defense: Deal:
Bid these hands with a partner.
♠10 8 6 ♥K J 8 ♦K J 10 ♣J 10 6 5. The East hands are on pg. 59. The
Dlr: East ♠AK97
At favorable vulnerability, your part- North–South players are silent unless
Vul: N–S ♥Q
ner deals and opens 4♥. This is passed otherwise noted. Scores on pgs. 37–39.
♦AQ74
around to your left-hand opponent, ♣AQ94
who balances with a double. RHO takes Problem 1. North deals. None vul.
♠ 10 8 6 ♠52 North opens 1NT (15–17). If doubled,
it out to 4♠ and you try 5♥. LHO bids ♥KJ8 ♥A9765432
5♠ and your partner doubles. Every- South redoubles to ask for suits up the
♦ K J 10 ♦— line, and North bids 2♣ if necessary.
one passes and it is your lead. ♣ J 10 6 5 ♣K87
For partner to preempt and then ♠QJ43 ♠J 9 8 4 3 ♥6 ♦Q J 10 5 ♣8 5 2
double, he likely has a defensive sur- ♥ 10
prise. It isn’t a trump stack, so probably ♦986532 Problem 2. East deals. N–S vul.
he has a void. Trying to hit that void, ♣32 ♠Q 6 2 ♥10 7 ♦K 7 6 5 ♣A Q J 9
you lead the ♣J and see:
So, if you return a diamond, partner Problem 3. South deals. E–W vul.
♠AK97 ruffs and you later get a diamond trick
♥Q ♠A ♥A 10 7 6 4 ♦A Q 8 2 ♣A J 6
for down two. But, the best part of the
♦AQ74 story is yet to come.
♣AQ94 At the table, West indeed figured his Problem 4. West deals. Both vul.
♠ 10 8 6 partner was void in diamonds, but he ♠K 4 ♥A K 9 8 5 2 ♦Q 9 6 3 ♣9
♥KJ8 returned the ♦J. Why does that mat-
♦ K J 10 ter? Because declarer also knew from Problem 5. North deals. N–S vul.
♣ J 10 6 5 the bidding and play what was going
♠A Q J 10 9 4 ♥K ♦K Q ♣9 8 5 3
on. He played low from dummy on the
The ♣Q is played from dummy. Part- ♦J return! How was East to know to
ner doesn’t ruff, but he wins the ♣K let this win? He figured declarer had Problem 6. East deals. E–W vul.
and returns the ♥9 to declarer’s ♥10 the ♦K, so he ruffed, in effect ruff- ♠A 5 4 ♥3 ♦J 10 9 8 6 2 ♣K Q 5
and your king. Now what? ing his partner’s winner. Declarer was
Why did partner underlead his ♥A? down only one after all. Problem 7. South deals. Both vul.
So you can give him a ruff. Did you play West should return the ♦K! Now, his
a club (figuring that even if he doesn’t ♠J ♥Q 5 ♦A K Q 9 3 ♣K 9 7 4 3
partner can’t go wrong and the con-
ruff this, his void must be in diamonds tract is down two. You see something
and you’ll set the contract anyway)? Problem 8. West deals. None vul.
new every day. ◾
That’s not trusting your partner. He ♠K J 7 ♥A K Q 9 8 ♦Q J ♣Q 9 5
of the Month
Dlr: North ♠ A J 9 3
Vul: Both ♥ K 5
♦ K J 10 7 6
♣ 10 7
♠ 10
♥AQ98764
♦9
♣AKQ9
Challenge Answer
Club and ♠AJ93 and continue with the ♠J, pitching
Cruise ♥K5 the diamond from your hand, allow-
Director Courses ♦ K J 10 7 6 ing West to win the ♠Q. If West exits
♣ 10 7 a diamond, ruff and play two rounds
The Club & Cruise Directors Course ♠KQ872 ♠654 of trumps ending in dummy. You plan
prepares candidates for directing club
♥ 10 ♥J32 to discard the ♣9 on the ♠9. You can
and bridge cruise games. Includes the
♦85 ♦AQ432 then cross to your hand with a club to
ACBL Club Director test.
♣J8432 ♣65 draw the last trump.
Atlanta GA (NABC) ♠ 10 What if an opponent ruffs the ♠9?
July 24–26 ♥AQ98764 You’ll overruff and hope that the ♣J
Joyce Stone 662–253–3100 ♦9 comes down when you play the top
directorcourses@acbl.org ♣AKQ9 clubs. ◾
Bidding Matters
BY KAREN WALKER kwbridge.com
You open 1♦ and partner responds contributor to table feel is your bid- time, however, may be consumed by
1♠, both opponents passing. What’s ding tempo. If you took more than 5–6 regrets that you didn’t open 1NT.
your rebid holding: seconds to decide on a rebid with any If you want to neutralize your op-
of the hands above, you’ve revealed you ponents’ table feel, you need to make
❶ ♠J 9 3 ♥A K 7 2 ♦K Q 8 3 ♣7 2 ? had a problem. Your opponents will these decisions smoothly. The best way
❷ ♠10 ♥K Q J 6 ♦K 9 7 5 3 ♣A 10 4 ? know that whatever your choice, you to do that is to make them early, before
won’t have the classic hand for it. your first bid. Get in the habit of pre-
❸ ♠K ♥Q 7 5 4 ♦A Q J 4 2 ♣K J 5 ? With hand 1, a slow raise to 2♠ dicting the auction and planning your
There’s no perfect rebid with any suggests one of two problems: Only rebid, focusing on the most common
of these hands, so you have to choose three-card support or a hand with al- and problematic developments:
from imperfect alternatives. How most enough for a jump to 3♠. There’s ⦁ If you open a minor, be ready for
much time did you take to make each a natural tendency to value up when partner to bid your short major.
decision? How quickly would you raising partner’s suit, so the three-card
choose your bids at the table? raise is more likely. If your opponents ⦁ If you open a major, expect a 1NT
In an ideal auction, the only knowl- read this correctly, they’ll know not to response.
edge your opponents have about your make an aggressive balance, and it may ⦁ If you Blackwood, decide in ad-
hand comes from your actual bids. help them on defense. vance how you’ll proceed after
Being human, however, we often give With hand 2, a hesitant 1NT rebid is every possible reply.
away extra information by our body usually based on a distributional flaw, ⦁ If you’re responder, assume that
language, facial expressions and other and your opponents will have a good opener won’t raise your suit.
behaviors. Your opponents are allowed guess about what it is.
to use their “table feel” to interpret On 3, it may take some time to decide ⦁ If you’re in fourth seat, don’t count
these clues and make inferences about on the least of three evils: the three- on being able to open the bidding.
what type of hand you hold. card club suit, a skinny reverse or a Consider your options if one or
The most frequent and valuable heavy 1NT. Much of your thinking both opponents bid in front of you.
You can’t have a contingency plan for
every possible auction, but it’s impor-
tant to be prepared for the simple ones.
Call for nominations Thwarting the opponents’ table feel is
Nominations are now being accepted for the 2018 Goodwill just one reason to avoid tempo breaks.
Member of the Year. This honorary title is given to the ACBL Another is that they put pressure on
member who has exhibited unselfish dedication to the causes partner. Your opponents are entitled to
of good conduct, worthy participation and ethical behavior. speculate about what you were think-
Any unit/district official in good standing may nominate a ing about, but partner isn’t, and this
candidate. can limit his options. He must ignore
Please include the name of the candidate, contact informa-
the break and take care not to make
tion and why you believe the candidate deserves recognition as the Goodwill Member
any bid that might be suggested by your
of the Year. Also, include your own name, contact information and unit/district affiliation.
hesitation.
A nomination form is available at acbl.org/goodwillnominations, or email your nomi-
nation to kelley.trejo@acbl.org. Nominations are open until Oct. 15, 2018. More about solving tempo problems
in the next issue. ◾
60 Bridge Bulletin July 2018
Advanced Players
Mike’s Advice
BY MIKE LAWRENCE michaelslawrence.com
In a recent online tournament, this do now? Switch to diamonds? Lead the had 11 HCP, but no one would say this
deal came up. Look at this deal from ♠A? Underlead the ♠A? was a sound opening bid. When North
East’s perspective: West led the ♣8 for East to ruff. He showed hearts, South refrained from
could have led a low club, but he didn’t. bidding 3♥. That would have promised
Dlr: North ♠ 4 2 So West must be signaling for a spade a full opener.
Vul: N–S ♥ Q 8 6 5 4 return. North took some liberties when he
♦A64 Here’s the entire deal: bid 3NT. He felt he had to do some-
♣KQ6 thing, and 3NT was his guess. South
♠A863 ♠42 then bid 4♥, showing he preferred
♥97 ♥Q8654 hearts to notrump.
♦ Q J 10 8 3 2 ♦A64 All of this information is available to
♣J ♣KQ6 East. East can conclude that South has
♠QJ5 ♠A863 a bad opening bid, which means that
West North East South ♥AK ♥97 West has a decent hand.
Pass Pass 1♣ ♦975 ♦ Q J 10 8 3 2 At the point where East ruffed the
Pass 1♦ 3♦ Pass ♣98543 ♣J club, he chose to lead a low spade. This
Pass 3NT Pass 4♥ ♠ K 10 9 7 might work if South has the ♠K J, but
All Pass ♥ J 10 3 2 in reality it should never work. Best is
♦K to lead the ace. It is guaranteed to beat
The auction needs explanation. ♣ A 10 7 2 the contract. Can you see why?
North–South were using transfer re- The answer to this question can be
sponses to 1♣. Hence, North’s 1♦ bid What actually happened was that learned by reflecting on the bidding.
said he had hearts. East hadn’t opened East led a low spade. South played the For South to make 4♥, he needs to
2♦ because he had four good spades, king, and then discarded dummy’s have the following hand or one like it:
but on the second round, he came in second spade on the ♣10. Red faces
♠K J x x ♥A J x x ♦x ♣A 10 x x.
with 3♦, a weak jump overcall. South all around: Even on BBO you could see
and West passed, and North bid 3NT. them. If South had this hand, he wouldn’t
South finally raised hearts, and played What should have happened, and pass over 3♦. He would bid 3♥. South
in 4♥. why? First, note that West didn’t lead did correct to 4♥ at the end of the
West led the ♣9, and the play went a diamond. He chose a club because he auction, but he can’t have a good hand
very well for East. Dummy’s ♣K won judged that North–South had a club fit, because he already admitted he had a
the first trick, and declarer led a heart and he hoped to give East a ruff or two. bad one.
to his jack and West’s king. West then His lead was thoughtful. As East, if you lead the ♠A, your
led the ♣8, which East ruffed. So far, Now, look at the bidding. South partner will either have the ♠K, and
South has played two low clubs, so opened 1♣ in third seat. In third seat, you will set 4♥ immediately, or your
East knows declarer has the ♣A 10 anything goes. South could have had a partner will have the ♥A, which will
remaining. real opener, but he could also have less be the setting trick later. ◾
The defense has two tricks in, and than opening values. The actual hand
the ♠A is another. What should East
A. If the queen is covered, win and discard a club on a high diamond, The defender who wins cannot break
1. the ace, discard a club on the ♦J, losing two hearts and a spade. If either diamonds without removing the guess
cash the ♣A, ruff a club and ruff opponent had ♥K Q x x, you will need for the jack, nor can he lead a heart
a spade. At this point, the most you can the club finesse. If East had ♥K Q x x, without conceding a ruff and sluff.
possibly lose is a spade and two hearts. he can win the second heart, put This allows you to ruff in dummy and
And you have chances for an overtrick partner in with a spade, and now a club discard a club. Now you can go looking
if a heart honor drops under the ace. shift forces you to take the finesse to for the ♦J (or 3–3 clubs, possibly) for a
B. Win the ace, ruff a diamond, ruff a make the contract. valuable matchpoint overtrick.
spade and ruff a diamond. At this point, b. Play the ♥A and a heart. If hearts Let’s go back to clubs. If West has
one of the following scenarios is likely are 3–2, cross to the ♣A and discard led a singleton or from a doubleton,
to have taken place: a club on the ♦J. You lose two hearts the best East can do is win the heart
a. Diamonds were 3–3. and a spade. exit and cash the ♣K, giving declarer
b. Diamonds were 4–2, and East had c. Take the finesse. a diamond discard on the ♣J. Had you
K–x. (Presumably West would have d. Play the ♥A. If an honor falls, you not cashed the ♣A, and West led from
covered with K–x.) have 10 tricks: six hearts, three aces 10–x, West could have won the heart
c. West had two low diamonds, over- and a spade ruff. At matchpoints, it and exited a club, forcing you to go
ruffed the third diamond with an honor would be tempting to take the club fi- out looking for the ♦J to make your
perforce, cashed a spade, and shifted to nesse for an overtrick. If a heart honor contract.
a club. does not appear, take the club finesse. If clubs are 3–3, the fourth club
d. West had four diamonds headed by in dummy can be used to discard a
the king, and East discarded a club on You have a 100% play. See it? diamond.
the third diamond. 2. Draw three rounds of spades, Equally divided suits (such as hearts
How do you react in each case? leaving a spade entry to dummy in this case) lend themselves to throw-
a. Cash the ♥A and, if no honor just in case, cash the ♣A (key play) and in plays after the other suits have been
drops, play a second heart. If hearts are exit with the ♥A and a heart. stripped or partially stripped. ◾
3–2, you will be able to cross to the ♣A
George’s World
BY GEORGE JACOBS NOBET8888@aol.com
Well, I promised you a recap of two Dlr: North ♠ 2 in history, if you ignore Fred’s home
of the most unusual scores I have ever Vul: N–S ♥ Q 10 5 game. But I digress.
seen. The kicker: Both of them were in ♦7 Back to Board 17. We were in a non-
the same session! ♣ A K Q J 10 7 6 4 vulnerable 4♥ making for plus 420.
Playing with Sylvia Summers in the ♠653 ♠ J 10 9 8 7 4 The opponents (Kit Woolsey) called
Silodor Open Pairs in Philadelphia: ♥A82 ♥KJ97643 the directors over some tiny deficiency
Sylvia opened 1♥ in third chair at un- ♦9843 ♦— and said that had they gotten correct
favorable. It went double, and I jumped ♣932 ♣— information, they might have bid dif-
to three preemptive clubs. After pass, ♠AKQ ferently, defeating our contract by one
Sylvia upped the ante with 4♣ and ♥— trick.
West, who had a moose, bid 5♣. East ♦ A K Q J 10 6 5 2 There were some significant hesita-
(who asked no questions, and who ♣85 tions by the directors as they sought
must have thought that 3♣ was a fit to be fair to all sides. They reached the
of sorts, and 4♣ was a cuebid and 5♣ following conclusion: It is possible that
was finally showing the suit) passed. hoping I could make it. Plus 2140. we might still make 4♥, and it is pos-
I also promised Fred Lerner that I At the other table there was a snafu. sible that the opponents might defeat
would keep his name out of the Bulle- After 1♣–2♣, South wanted to be it. The directors decided to factor the
tin. Fred, who had bid 5♣ with: sure they were not off an ace, so he bid two possible results as if each outcome
Blackwood. I think he hoped for a three happened 50% of the time: add them
♠A K Q J 9 8 4 ♥K 7 3 ♦A K Q ♣—, key-card reply, which would solve all together and divide by two. Yes, they
gave it his best, but had a bit of trouble the problems. What he got was 5♠, did! So plus 420 and minus 50 = plus
making it. I estimated down seven showing two key cards and the queen. 370. If I could find the divide sign on
at the table and sure as heck, it went But now East bid 5NT, forcing part- this keyboard, I would show you that
down seven, plus 350 our way. ner to bid a slam! Belatedly, South (not 370 divided by 2 = 185. That became
Later, we played Board 17 and got Fred Lerner) jumped to 7♦, but West, our score. 185 may not be the best
a score you have never heard before. holding ♥A x x, and hearing partner score I have ever had, but it is the most
Believe me, I am the holder of many force to slam, bid 7♥! unusual.
scores of which you never heard. Well, poor North. His partner has bid So I just reread my notes; the op-
Claude and I once played on a team Blackwood and then jumped to a grand ponents actually sacrificed in 5♣ and
with Kay Beck and Hans Jacobs. (At slam, so he “knows” they have all the went for 300. Don’t be confused by
one point we were going to put to- aces and he has seven running clubs. that. The issue was of ROLLING IT
gether an all Jacobs team. Sadly that So he bids 7NT. After two passes, West, BACK to 4♥, which might or might not
never came to pass.) I love telling this holding the ♥A and on lead due to make. I should not write these columns
story, but space does not permit all the South’s 4NT bid, says double. so late at night, and you should cer-
details. North now recounts his clubs, tainly not read them prior to going to
discovers that he actually has eight bed anyway.
(See next column) solid, and says redouble. As you can See you all in Atlanta, where my
At our table the bidding was short and see, our teammates took the first seven 15-year partner, Ralph Katz, is to be
sweet. 1♣ by partner, 2♣ (showing tricks for 3400, which, when added to inducted into the Hall of Fame. He also
both majors) by righty, and I bid 7♦, our 2140, is possibly the biggest score loves Chinese food. ◾
64 Bridge Bulletin July 2018
Special Contributors
Dear Billy
BY BILLY MILLER dearbilly@aol.com
The Parrot had replaced Brother Near the end of their match against the club ace and called for a trump. The
Xavier in the monastery team com- the Glassover team, the Parrot’s card- ♠9 appeared from East and the Parrot
peting in the Winchester green-point play was tested again: followed blithely with the ♠2. Stan
Swiss event. The Abbot was far from Glassover raised an eyebrow when the
happy with the unfriendly reception Dlr: South ♠ 8 4 3 9 won the trick. Had the strange bird
that his partner had received. Were Vul: E–W ♥ Q J 8 6 meant to do that? With any luck he
the English not famed for welcoming ♦AKQJ4 would be the only declarer in the event
strangers into their midst? Did they ♣A to go down in a cold slam.
not realize that it was perfectly possi- ♠ J 10 7 5 ♠9 The Parrot won the heart switch
ble for a parrot to play bridge at a high ♥ K 10 3 ♥974 with the ace and drew a second round
level? As for Mr. Glassover making an ♦93 ♦8652 of trumps, East showing out. He then
inappropriate comment about jungles, ♣ Q J 10 8 ♣K7543 ruffed a club in dummy and returned to
this was hardly appropriate in an event ♠AKQ62 his hand with the ♦10. After drawing
where national green points were ♥A52 the remaining trumps, he claimed the
awarded. ♦ 10 7 contract. “Three losers go on dia-
♣962 monds,” he squawked.
West North East South Mrs. Glassover was not entranced
Stan The Emily The with the Parrot’s overbearing manner.
Nominations for the 2019 ACBL Glassover Abbot Glassover Parrot “It’s not very good etiquette to look so
Bridge Hall of Fame Blackwood 1♠ pleased with yourself,” she informed
and von Zedtwitz awards Pass 2♦ Pass 2NT him. “So what if you made twelve
Pass 3♠ Pass 4♥ tricks? There was nothing we could do
Each year, the Bridge Hall of Fame Com-
Pass 4NT Pass 5♦ about it.”
mittee considers candidates for the Black-
wood Award, given for outstanding contri- Pass 5♥ Pass 6♠ The Parrot made no reply, shrugging
butions to bridge outside of expertise at the All Pass his shoulders as he returned his cards
game, and the von Zedtwitz Award, which to the board.
honors inactive players who have achieved The Abbot used Roman key card Black- Stan Glassover leaned forward,
prominence in the game of bridge. wood to locate the ♥A and the ♠A K Q. anxious to support his wife. “If you’re
ACBL members in good standing may Stan Glassover led the ♣Q against the as clever as you make out, perhaps you
submit candidates’ names to the Hall of spade slam and down went the dummy. could tell us how we could have beaten
Fame Committee for induction into the it,” he said.
The Parrot nodded his acceptance of
ACBL Bridge Hall of Fame in 2019. To be The Parrot raised his eyes to the ceil-
eligible for induction, a candidate must be at the Abbot’s bidding and paused to plan
the play. If trumps were 3–2, he could ing. “Diamond, diamond,” he replied.
least 60 years old and live in North America.
score five spades, five diamonds, two “That’s true,” exclaimed the Abbot.
Please submit your nominations for these
aces and a club ruff for an overtrick. “There’s no way you could find such a
awards to the Bridge Hall of Fame Commit-
tee to elections@acbl.org. Nominations will What if trumps were 4–1? In that case lead, I realize. If you do happen to lead
be forwarded to the chair of the committee. it might be a good idea to concede a a diamond and play another diamond
In order to be considered, nominations must trump trick while dummy still had when you take your trump trick, you
be received no later than Nov. 1. ruffing protection in clubs. kill the diamond suit. Declarer can’t
The Parrot won the first trick with arrange his club ruff.” ◾
66 Bridge Bulletin July 2018
New
Life Masters
Canada
Chris Burton, Lethbridge AB Carol Schwerer, Palo Alto CA Robert Kerr, Silver Spring MD Erwis Rabin, Gates Mills OH
Andy McKaig, Calgary AB Gloria Shagrun, Chico CA Doris Jefferies, Bloomfield MI C. Daniel Sommer, Independence OH
Elly Boshell, West Vancouver BC Daniel Sonner, Redwood City CA Gerald Mandell, West Bloomfield MI Barbara Speer, Beachwood OH
Denise Holst, Courtenay BC Jeannette Stern, Carmel By Sea CA John Corley, Burnsville MN Stephen Vogel, Cincinnati OH
Ronald Kuiper, Surrey BC Judith Tomic, Rancho Palos Verdes CA Gloria Georger, Rochester MN Joe Wernet, Bexley OH
Jean-Philipp Weber, Victoria BC Ashok Wadhwa, San Clemente CA John Schlundt, Eden Prairie MN Mary Bell, Canyonville OR
Freddie Mykytyshyn, Winnipeg MB Kay Wyhlidko, Fair Oaks CA Kathy Hagedorn, St. Louis MO Ronald Foerster, Bend OR
Michael Birks, Fredericton NB Brent Xiao, Fremont CA Patricia Bumgarner, McGrady NC Maria Hakki, Portland OR
Barb Croft, Mount Uniacke NS Christopher Dorton, Silverthorne CO Marjorie Cannity, Raleigh NC Kevin Marnell, Portland OR
Don Wright, Kentville NS Louise Forsythe, Greenwood Village CO Martin Causley, Chapel Hill NC Carole Murphy, Hood River OR
Karla Zwicker, Hants County NS William Foss, Denver CO John Dayton Jr., Fayetteville NC Frank Nemeth, Portland OR
Tom Jolliffe, London ON Peter Fox, Denver CO Tobi Dicker, Cary NC David Smith, Corvallis OR
Catherine Loughlin, Kingston ON Mark Henderson, Lakewood CO Eleanor Eisenman, Wilmington NC Kay Hays, Allentown PA
Jeanette McTaggart, Ottawa ON Lou Ann Mauer, Aurora CO Sara Ramsey, Raleigh NC Jeanne Lantzy, Palmyra PA
Sheila Murray, Kincardine ON Shirley Miller, Golden CO Jeanne Torello, Concord NC Barbara Patterson, Furlong PA
Fred Oliver, Oshawa ON Burney Tate, Loveland CO Louise Watson, Wilson NC Bharat Rao, Berwyn PA
Carol Rossmann, Windsor ON Conrad Waggener, Pueblo CO Arnold Fox, Eatontown NJ Gregory Wolf, Erie PA
Serge Cote, Quebec QC Robert Donnalley Jr., Greenwich CT Thaddeus Gora, Kinnelon NJ Charles Anderegg Jr.,
Robert Fleury, Montreal QC Joy Mehta, Southport CT Prem Gupta, Monroe Township NJ Mount Pleasant SC
Serge Girard, Chicoutimi QC Patty Read, Riverside CT James Koss, Medford NJ Nimet Hatcher, Ladys Island SC
Marcel Verreault, Laval QC John Flanagan, Hockessin DE David Weinberg, Brick NJ Angela Letourneau, Indian Land SC
Mike Broda, Saskatoon SK Don Steiner, Milford DE Maria Poh, Las Vegas NV Constance McKeown, Rock Hill SC
G. Grainger, Regina SK Louise Anderson, Fort Myers FL James Sadler, Las Vegas NV Linda Richelson, Fort Mill SC
Rudelpha Paraschuk, Saskatoon SK Steve Despot, Bradenton FL Gary Conners, Pittsford NY Matthew Morgan, Nashville TN
Ellen Shatilla, Saskatoon SK Doug Finch, Fort Myers FL Ellen Cooper, Roslyn NY Barbara Glass, Sugar Land TX
Beverly Steppler, Regina SK William George, Sebring FL Manuela Kanners, New York NY Robert Holliday, Plano TX
Bruce Graham, Dunnellon FL Holli Mast, Corning NY Rajasekhar Menon, Southlake TX
United States Sylvia Levinson, Fort Myers FL Matthew Rudary, New York NY Victor Tong, Houston TX
Lawrence Myers, Birmingham AL Oyar Miller, Estero FL Patricia Stacom, New York NY Amy Brisson, Arlington VA
Howard Maves, Maricopa AZ Frank Pietro II, Cape Coral FL Marilyn Wortzman, Amherst NY Karen Hamlett, Glen Allen VA
Donald Baze, Lakeport CA Donald Rancourt, The Villages FL Barbara Crucs, Copley OH Gary Scavongelli, Burke VA
Daphne Bransten, San Francisco CA Doris Schons, Estero FL Bill Hogsett, Cleveland OH Carole Spencer, Blacksburg VA
Julie Burnet, Oakland CA Jack Sieling, Pinellas Park FL Polly James, Galena OH Tony Alberts, Seattle WA
Eric Byler, Palo Alto CA Daisy Smith, Naples FL Carol Manning, Gates Mills OH Richard Crawford, Lacey WA
Carole Anne Gennaro, San Mateo CA Chris Weyland, Naples FL Kay Penson, Dublin OH Margaret King, Seattle WA
Laura Gherman, Pebble Beach CA Tommy Jackson, Palmetto GA Kevin Phipps, Akron OH Paul Martin, Duvall WA
Robyn Grant, Newport Beach CA Gail Ostermann, Atlanta GA
Stanley Green, Greenbrae CA Sumner Rosenberg, Atlanta GA
Jonann Noftsger, Des Moines IA
Julie Greenberg, San Diego CA
Richard Hottell, Rancho Murieta CA Bruce Thornburgh, Boise ID Exciting Opportunity in Oaxaca, Mexico
Savita Jain, Irvine CA Robert Alps, Evanston IL
Kathy Juarez, Santa Rosa CA Woody Haynes, Chicago IL Wanted: An ACBL-certified director conversant
Renee Laquerriere, Clovis CA Jane Herman, Effingham IL with ACBL protocols and fluent in Spanish.
Qing Lu, San Jose CA William Herman, Effingham IL
Sarah Colvin, Fort Wayne IN
Can augment retirement income by teaching.
Roy Redlich, Petaluma CA
Rose Reynolds, Newport Beach CA Harry Preston, Indianapolis IN For more information contact:
Margaret Riegert, Lincoln CA Ann Brown, Louisville KY
Abhijit Dutta, Jamaica Plain MA
Laligadebridgeoax@gmail.com
Joerg Rottenbacher, Arcadia CA
Nancy Rubinstein, San Diego CA David Poole, Wayland MA
Emerald Life Master (7500 MPs) Flo Savage, Portland OR H. Jay Sloofman, Ardsley NY JoAnn Coulter, Milton FL
Laurence Betts, Burnaby BC Gary Donner, Bluffton SC Jim Breckel, Rocky River OH Fern Manevitch, Boca Raton FL
Ganesan Sekhar, Winnipeg MB Judith Ortiz, San Antonio TX Laurie Rowe, Eugene OR Catherine Noel, Fort Myers FL
Jodi Kimbrell, Spokane WA D.H. Hall, Charleston SC Margaret Roush, Fort Myers FL
Janet King, Alexandria AL Marsha Platnick, Bluefield WV Yin Choo, Sugar Land TX P.H. Shah, Clearwater FL
Barbara Sonsini, Woodside CA Jim Harp, Dallas TX Bobby Stein, Delray Beach FL
Spencer Jones, Denver CO Sapphire Life Master (3500 MPs) Milton Neher, Richardson TX Ann Taylor, Port St Lucie FL
Marlene Solender, Tamarac FL Steven Unger, Thornhill ON Helen Martin, Williamsburg VA Patrick Thompson, Gainesville FL
Jan Galey, Baton Rouge LA Avril Rodney, Fairfax VA Joseph Ur, St. Augustine FL
Alan Tenenbaum, Rockville MD Ted Gibbs, Rancho Palos Verdes CA
Richard Gold, Oceanside CA Michael Boruta, Anacortes WA Evelyn Gilliard, East Point GA
Debra Eaves, Northville MI Charles Burns, Vancouver WA Robert Adams, South Bend IN
James La Fountain, Temple TX Erin Gove, Los Gatos CA
Marilyn Hahn, Palm Desert CA Lois Boagni, Opelousas LA
Gold Life Master (2500 MPs) Sally Gerhold, Baton Rouge LA
Diamond Life Master (5000 MPs) Carolyn Borus, Denver CO Ted Rich, Penticton BC
Nicole Beauregard, Calgary AB Rob Lorck, Colorado Springs CO Connie Chabot, Haverhill MA
Sigitas Keras, Toronto ON Andris Strauss, Abingdon MD
Dan Boyle, Ottawa ON Robert Lupton, Aurora CO Kevin Loughlin, Kingston ON
Ina Demme, Maple ON Robert McKenzie, Thornton CO Tommie Wright, Hattiesburg MS
Kole Meng, Richmond Hill ON Michael Boreson, Kalispell MT
Roisin O’Hara, Oakville ON Silvana Bellini, St. Petersburg FL Doug Reynolds, Braeside ON
Gary Bernstein, Montreal QC Larry Giltman, Port St. Lucie FL Judy Hurder, Salisbury NC
Claude Garneau, St. Lambert QC Marian Schreyer, Albuquerque NM
Yvon Gravel, Mascouche QC Masood Kizilbash, Tampa FL
Wojciech Szalecki, Madeira Beach FL Becky Bien, Little Rock AR Wayne Gordon, Reno NV
Tom Jacobson, Fairfield CA Judy Fendrick, Marietta GA Jared Boulds, Tucson AZ Allen Beroza, East Amherst NY
Joan Rubin, Encino CA Varghese George, Martinez GA W.P. Fuesz, Green Valley AZ Michael Fishman, Great Neck NY
Jody Williams, San Carlos CA Sue Erickson, Rolling Meadows IL Nancy Borucki, Monterey CA Irene Geisinger, Westbury NY
Michael Blaher, Fern Park FL Leroy Breimeier, Vincennes IN Constance Fishbach, Los Angeles CA Stephen Levine, New York NY
Bruce Thiher, The Villages FL Verna Dahlquist, Sulphur LA Stephen Kennedy, Oakland CA Vincent Pesce, North Tonawanda NY
Alma Karas, Batavia IL Carol Hawley, Baton Rouge LA Richard Leach, Laguna Beach CA Gruna Selby, Tuxedo NY
Idell Adams, Baton Rouge LA Paul Wolf II, Shrewsbury MA Tammy Purkin, Encino CA Lowry West, Lawton OK
Dana Hastings, Baton Rouge LA Wayne Gergen, Minneapolis MN Bob Sanner, Palo Alto CA Donald Clayton, Seneca SC
Julius Rosenfield, New Orleans LA Lily Chan, Columbia MO Walter Thorpe, Seaside CA Ila Bates, Waco TX
Marina Polestra, Boston MA Jonathan Weinstein, St. Louis MO Judy Goldstein, Denver CO Al Cupps, Houston TX
Charlotte Miller, Farmington Hills MI Elizabeth Evans, Mountainside NJ Roger Miller, Highlands Ranch CO James McCommons, Dallas TX
Kerry Kappell, Sunnyside NY J. David Adler, New York NY Edward Texel, Colorado Springs CO Patsy Pierce, Hardin TX
Robert Neuhart, Troy NY Gillian Miniter, New York NY Terry Patton, Selbyville DE Carolyn Kuske, Appleton WI
Alan Johnson, Happy Valley OR Mary Hedges, Casper WY
68 Bridge Bulletin July 2018
Silver Life Master (1000 MPs) Carol Williams, Kailua HI
Perry Clark, Calgary AB Cherilyn Young, Honolulu HI
Hans Folkinga, Edmonton AB Donald Cordts, Le Claire IA
Peter Kroeger, Calgary AB Rick Hendryx, Ankeny IA
Elizabeth Sprague, Calgary AB Edward Carlson, Coeur D’Alene ID
Ona Bouchard, Salmon Arm BC Donald Hanset, Sandpoint ID
Beth Cookson, Nanaimo BC Kathryn Luft, Boise ID
Elaine Hansen-Hill, Kelowna BC Beryl Block, Northbrook IL
Neville Hircock, Victoria BC Mark Stein, Skokie IL
Eda Kadar, Vancouver BC Ann Braucher, Billerica MA
Gerald Leckie, Vancouver BC Elinore Hildebrandt, Winchester MA
Manju Singh, Kamloops BC Michael Ford, Crofton MD
Wilma Simpson, Kentville NS Glenn Terborg, Portage MI
Hachy Pennell Erez Hendelman Ranbir Gugneja, Windsor ON Richard Cottle, St. Paul MN
Aurora CO New York NY Peter Hutchison, Toronto ON Joyce Johnson, New Prague MN
Platinum Life Master Platinum Life Master Lawrence Lazazzera, Toronto ON Ted Baldwin, St. Louis MO
10,000 masterpoints 10,000 masterpoints Uday Maitra, Mississauga ON Paul Beebe, Fairview NC
Larry Potvin, Kingston ON Agnes Gentry Cherry, Wilson NC
H. Ivan Struminger, Toronto ON Noralie Cox, Granite Falls NC
Eric David, Sainte-Julie QC Thomas Cozart, Wilson NC
Jean Lawes, Cut Knife SK Charles Frith, Raleigh NC
Ruby Life Master (1500 MPs) Barbara Bernhard, Lafayette LA
Donald Norman, Regina SK Carol Grizzard, Chapel Hill NC
Helen Anglehart, Victoria BC Anthony Keats, Framingham MA
Ellen Melenikiotis, Chapel Hill NC
Shelley Burns, North Vancouver BC Lorne Ginn, Towson MD
Kaye Cotton, Rogers AR Susan Wesley, Winston-Salem NC
Neil O’Brian, Miramichi NB Betsy Howe, Levering MI
Sandra Lloyd, McGehee AR Peggy Young, Charlotte NC
Michael Alderson, Strathroy ON Allan Loeb, Ann Arbor MI
Robert Adam, Huntington Beach CA J.E. Brill, Voorhees NJ
Amir Farsoud, Welland ON David Gronbeck, Minneapolis MN
Carolyn Casey, San Diego CA Akshay Shah, Somerset NJ
Tillie Lewis, Toronto ON Thomas Knier, Burnsville MN
Julio Cervantes, Altadena CA Peggy Moran, Santa Fe NM
Tom Platt, Mississauga ON Jill Nance, Springfield MO
Ann Dupont, Calabasas CA Donna Sirubi, Santa Fe NM
Luc Gagnon, Baie-Comeau QC Mrs. J. Kirkpatrick, Hattiesburg MS
Frank Frand, Dana Point CA Darryl Depew, Henderson NV
Umanath Tiwari, Dol-Des-Ormeaux QC Henry Nemec, Great Falls MT
Diana Glimm, Solana Beach CA Bobbi Kornbluth, Reno NV
Deanna Larus, Chapel Hill NC
Jane Harrison, Oceanside CA Peggy Blumenfeld, Dix Hills NY
Michael Schmahl, Wasilla AK Ben Roberts, Taylorsville NC
Barbara Horn, Whittier CA Ruth Fox, Roslyn Heights NY
John Babb, Scottsdale AZ Keith Bartels, Lincoln NE
James Kristiansen, Lake Forest CA Leonardo Fruscoloni, New York NY
Daniel Halsey, Surprise AZ B.L. (Tink) Tysor, Grantham NH
Margie Lee, South Pasadena CA Kiendl Gordon, New York NY
Dennis Higdem, Sun City AZ Alisa Crowe, Middletown NJ
Helen Lindsey, Morgan Hill CA Joyce Greenspan, East Amherst NY
Elaine Jones, Sun City West AZ Ira Starer, Mahwah NJ
Thomas Miller, San Clemente CA John Monti, Walden NY
Linda Danzig, Tiburon CA Brian Greer, Taos NM
Jo An Reid, Danville CA Helen Nathan, New York NY
Helene Dykes, Mission Viejo CA Clifford Rudy, Los Alamos NM
Anthony Salam, Brentwood CA Patrick Ross, Wantagh NY
Victoria Haines, Solana Beach CA Samuel Amer, Long Island NY
Gary Smith, Merced CA Daniel Rothstein, New York NY
Linda Jonas, Dana Point CA Mona Kronfeld, Manhasset NY
Roseanne Smith, Alameda CA Fali Rubinstein, Larchmont NY
Cindy Kirk, Novato CA Samuel Kuang, Elmhurst NY
Carol Stiff, San Clemente CA Fryderyka Shabry, Brooklyn NY
Hannah Kishi, Novato CA Vera Mandell, Port Washington NY
Frank Xie, Sunnyvale CA Stephanie Weisberg, New York NY
Maria Marshall, Oceanside CA Steven Waldman, New York NY
Don Elliott, Greeley CO Nancy Wolstoncroft, Buffalo NY
Torrence McGough, Santa Monica CA Shirley Weiermiller, Elmira NY
Eric Mead, Lakewood CO John Hibshman, Shaker Heights OH
Arthur Mirin, Castro Valley CA Wanda Carpenter, Oklahoma City OK
Belinda Rust, Denver CO Janet Rice, Cleveland OH
Richard Stryker, San Marcos CA Karen Diffenbach, Lancaster PA
Jo Santa, Colorado Springs CO C. Daniel Sommer, Independence OH
Alan Templeton, Sunnyvale CA Estelle Frankl, State College PA
Page Walker, Colorado Springs CO David Koble, Bartlesville OK
Lynne White, Lincoln CA John Leonard, York PA
Jacques Caroul, St. Augustine FL Sherri Morgan, Eugene OR
Jean Hupka, Boulder CO Judy Satzberg, Bala Cynwyd PA
Ivan Feit, Boca Raton FL Larry Plotkin, Elkins Park PA
Beth McGregor, Fort Collins CO Sidney Stanley, Brentwood TN
Kim Klancke, Ormond Beach FL Andrew Rosenberg, Philadelphia PA
Gordon Kiernan, Darien CT Courtney Coffman, The Woodlands TX
Dale Marx, The Villages FL April Uhlenburg, King of Prussia PA
Warren Williams, Wilton CT Glenda Cooper, Irving TX
Harvey Nelsen, Lutz FL Barbara Weinstein, Pittsburgh PA
David Goldstein, Naples FL Judith Ensor, Seabrook TX
Lynda Patten, Plantation FL Kristi Menees, Hilton Head SC
Nancy Myers, Tallahassee FL Letty Garek, Bedford TX
Arthur Patton, Jacksonville FL Bobbie Rothschild, Isle of Palms SC
Robert Renuart, Ponce Inlet FL Beth Hankins, Longview TX
Stephen Sakler, Delray Beach FL Jim Jones, Brentwood TN
Julian Wachs, Ocala FL Thomas Rush, Houston TX
Jayne Silver, West Palm Beach FL Jane Boozalis, Houston TX
Laurel Anne Barrett, Norcross GA Benjamin Allen, Culpeper VA
Arnold Winikoff, David Johnson Jr., San Antonio TX
Arjun Dhir, Alpharetta GA David Hankins, Kirkland WA
Palm Beach Gardens FL Stan Kurtzer, Cedar Park TX
Richard Jeng, Johns Creek GA Marilyn Lowe, Redmond WA
Lois Chesin, Marietta GA Jack Manderscheid, Houston TX
Thomas Hurt, Lombard IL Helen Miller, Lacey WA
William Edwards Jr., Dalton GA Jim Middleton, Houston TX
David Dressman, Burlington KY Duane Oyen, Eau Claire WI
Jane Fann Sanders,
Phillip Thompson, Campbellsville KY continued on pg. 71 ➤
St. Simons Island GA
July 2018 Bridge Bulletin 69
In Memoriam
Canada * Gabriela M. Jackson, Harbor City CA * Paul D. Gayer, Silver Spring MD * Barbara A. Bergman, Wexford PA
* Darlene L. Borman, Nanaimo BC Walter R. Newman, Carmel CA * Stephen E. Hawker, Baltimore MD Paul Fertell, Exton PA
Geoffrey Collins, Salmon Arm BC * Ronald E. Purkis, Upland CA Sidney Mintz, Bethesda MD * Hilda Gibson, Allentown PA
M. Anne Yanofsky, Halifax NS * Ron Studen, Novato CA * Nick Markakis, Troy MI * G. Margie Gwozdzinsky, Lords Valley PA
Judy E. Mills, Toronto ON * Bernard R. Weinstein, * Bea Bahr, Rochester MN Harold Hoffman, Hummelstown PA
* Eric R. Murray, Orangeville ON Rancho Palos Verdes CA John S. Connolly, St. Paul MN * Arnold H. Kritz, Bethlehem PA
Judith M. Schumacher, Kingston ON * Betty Yager, Carmel CA * Nan Herman, Eden Prairie MN * Claire Warren, Malvern PA
* Luc Lapointe, Chicoutimi QC Bernadette M. Borelli, Colorado Springs CO * Robert Huber, Minneapolis MN Tina Young, York PA
* Jacques Vallerand, Sainte-Adele QC Alice L. Noble, Broomfield CO * Tom L. Brown, Sunrise Beach MO * Barbara P. Smith, Clover SC
* Dr. Michael B. Moulding, Saskatoon SK Barbara Bennett, Ormond Beach FL * Larry M. Kolker, St. Louis MO Michael Verbonic, Landrum SC
* Douglas A. Schmeiser, Saskatoon SK Donald B. Bosley, Satellite Beach FL Dennis Becker, St. James NC * Anne H. Cosgrove, Hendersonville TN
Ann Tracey, Saskatoon SK Fred Egre, Clearwater FL * Dorothy W. Muilenburg, Arden NC Harriet H. Garth, Beaumont TX
Suzanne Garrard, Jacksonville FL * Robert L. D’Avanzo, Cape May Point NJ Carole L. Hardeman, Waco TX
Poland * Ron Goldman, Palm Beach Gardens FL Bruce Kahn, Ventnor City NJ * Judy R. Lewis, San Antonio TX
Julian Klukowski, Warsaw Patricia F. Magnuson, Crescent City FL Stephen B. Langfelder, Wanaque NJ Linda E. Simmering, Round Rock TX
* Liberty A. Williams, Venice FL Arlene Smith, Somerset NJ * John C. Sutherlin, Dallas TX
United States Marshall L. Wolf, Vero Beach FL * Murray S. Melton, Las Vegas NV Ruby V. Waggoner, Waco TX
* Alice Bunnell, Huntsville AL Mary Dickison, Peoria IL * Mary Ellen O’Brien, Las Vegas NV * Dorothy Vilven, Holladay UT
Barbara J. Hill, Hot Springs Village AR * Carl L. Jones, Chicago IL Louis Bashaw, Syracuse NY Michael J. Brown, Gainesville VA
Olly Blom, Bakersfield CA Roy T. Montgomery, Franklin IN Barbara D. Bell, Scarsdale NY Huntley G. Davenport, Richmond VA
* Cecil Q. Cook, Long Beach CA Francine Z. Rosenberg, Carmel IN Judy Finn, New York NY Mary D. Echols, Virginia Beach VA
* Steven I. Dagel, San Pedro CA * Dr. Gary H. Peterson, Louisville KY Richard H. Zonneville, Henrietta NY * Barbara M. Fitz-Gerald, Vergennes VT
* Marie C. Haggard, Mission Viejo CA * Bernice L. Goldstein, Falmouth MA * Carole A. Marcroft, Dayton OH Sybil W. Conner, Bellingham WA
Kathleen M. Harms, Santa Rosa CA * Jeffrey Dunn, Ellicott City MD Marjorie B. Narramore, Klamath Falls OR * Beth McCaslin, Kirkland WA
Roger R. Tallakson, Bend OR
* Robert Turkisher, Portland OR * Life Master
27–29 BC/West Kelowna Westbank Lions Comm. Centre David Crest 250–861–4673
The American Contract Bridge League 27–29 CA/Pasadena La Salle High School Mary Falvey 626–359–0271
Board of Directors is seeking qualified 26–28 DE/Lewes
applicants to represent Zone 2 (Canada, (Rehobeth Beach) Lewes Presbyterian Church Kim Holm 302–559–2023
Mexico and the United States) to the 27–29 IL/Edwardsville Knights of Columbus Hall Glenda Piek 618–656–3856
World Bridge Federation. Two positions 28–29 KY/Lexington
(nlm/500) Lexington Bridge Club Andra Gyor 859–221–8209
will be filled at the 2018 Fall NABC meet-
27–29 MN/North St. Paul
ings in Honolulu. The term for the open (nlm/500) Bridge Center of St. Paul Stephanie Miller 651–490–5430
WBF position begins Jan. 1, 2019, and ends 27–29 NB/Quispamsis Quispamsis Civic Centre Lois Sherwood 506–485–2253
Dec. 31, 2021. 27–29 NM/Los Alamos Betty Ehart Senior Center Martin Cooper 505–672–9696
Members of the ACBL in good standing 27–29 TX/Tyler Holiday Inn South Broadway Janie Wolaver 903–777–4889
and at least 18 years of age who desire to 27–29 WA/Bremerton West Side Improvement Club Guy Audett 360–871–5690
be a candidate for WBF Representative
July/August
for Zone 2 must file a written declaration 25–5 GA/ATLANTA MARRIOTT MARQUIS Summer NABC acbl.org
of candidacy with the director of elections
prior to Oct. 15, 2018. 31–10 CA/San Francisco
(nc)(cr) Crystal Symphony Robert Todd 850–570–6459
Send to: ACBL Director of Elections
P.ªO. Box 289 August
Horn Lake MS 38637-0289 2–5 AK/Fairbanks Elks Lodge Dannetta Wakefield 907–457–4124
elections@acbl.org 3–5 CA/Marysville St. John Episcopal Church Ramon Lopez 530–674–8782
4 CA/San Dieg
Please include any supporting materials
(nlm/500) Seven Oaks Community Center Art Foeste 608–274–6185
detailing your qualifications for this position. 3–5 CO/Avon (Vail) Homestake Peak School Bert Solomon 970–926–8699
1–2 FL/Deland (0-300) Deland Bridge Club Lynn Berg 386–736–6228
10–12 BC/Nanaimo Bowen Park Complex Barbara Jubenville 250–758–1888 HUNT VALLEY, MD
11–12 CA/Fresno (nlm/500) Fresno Bridge Center Laura Da Costa 559–999–2825 August 13–19
10–12 CO/Loveland Larimer County Fairgrounds John Wolf 303–810–4902 Hunt Valley Inn
10–12 CO/LOVELAND LARIMER COUNTY Chair: Mary Jo Chiesa (410) 353–7953
(nlm/750) FAIRGROUNDS John Grossmann 719–233–9464
Quigs8448@aol.com
10–12 FL/Fort Myers McGregor Point Bridge Club Val Covalciuc 239–415–8168
10–12 FL/Palm Coast Palm Coast Bridge Club Sylvia Caviggia 386–446–2571
6–12 ID/BOISE WYNDHAM GARDEN
AUGUSTA, GA
BOISE AIRPORT James Wheeler 360–546–0946 August 28–September 3
9–12 MA/Barnstable Barnstable Intermediate School Robert McCaw 781–752–6100 Augusta Downtown Marriott
11–12 MT/Great Fall Co-chair: Ray Coleman (706) 833–6496
(nlm/750) Big Sky Bridge Club Catherine Ayres 303–335–8756 csrabridge@yahoo.com
9–12 NC/Durham (nlm/500) Triangle Bridge Club Chris Moll 504–495–7485
10–12 NC/Hendersonville CHARLOTTE, NC
(nlm/500) Hendersonville Bridge Center Nick Weedman 828–693–5300 October 22–28
9–12 NE/Omaha Jewish Community Center Rick Ackermann 402–932–6262 Hilton Charlotte University Place
10–12 OH/Rocky River Rocky River Civic Center David Hobe 440–238–2356
Co-chair: Arnold Hoffmann (980) 254–7476
10–12 OK/Tulsa Wyndham Hotel Henry Robin 918–333–2760
10–12 ON/Tillsonburg Westfield Public School Jed Drew 519–842–8786 ajhoffmann@carolina.rr.com
12 PA/York (nlm/500) Bridge Boardroom Edward Scanlon 717–434–3298
6–12 QC/LAVAL SHERATON LAVAL Louise Mascolo 514–768–0616
www.mabcbridge.org
9–12 TX/Houston Marriott Westchase David Henke 832–407–2620
10–12 TX/Waco Waco Convention Center Ila Bates 254–732–3602
17–18 AL/Birmingham
(nlm/500) Birmingham DBC Martha Chitwood 205–252–9035
17–19 AR/Hot Springs Casa de Carta
Village (nlm/500) at Ponce De Leon Center Marianne Dethardt 501–984–2049
13–19 AZ/SCOTTSDALE TALKING STICK
RESORT & CASINO JoAnne Lowe 480–836–7296
17–19 CA/San Diego Marina Village Conference Ctr. Lamya Agelidis 615–887–1012
17–19 CA/Santa Barbara Goleta Valley Girls Inc. Claude Case 805–845–6357
18–19 CA/Redwood City Canada College – The Grove Marc Renson 650–622–6628
17–19 CT/Stamford Annunciation Greek
Orthodox Church Susan Seckinger 860–513–1127
17–19 GA/Macon Henry Tift Bridge Center Tom Wight 478–747–1096
17–19 IA/URBANDALE
(nlm/750) DES MOINES BRIDGE CENTER Barbara Maas 319–530–8510
16–19 ID/Idaho Falls Fairbridge Inn & Suites James Fisher 208–520–7840
18–19 KY/Louisville (nlm/500) Louisville Bridge Center Beth Dlutowski 502–653–7637
13–19 MD/HUNT VALLEY
(Baltimore) HUNT VALLEY INN Mary Jo Chiesa 410–353–7953
13–19 MI/PETOSKEY ODAWA CASINO Michael Sears 231–582–0604
13–19 MO/ST. LOUIS RENAISSANCE ST. LOUIS
AIRPORT HOTEL Michael Carmen 314–872–8439
15–18 NV/Sparks (Reno) Nugget Casino Resort Ruth Swain 701–261–4272
13–19 NY/LIVERPOOL HOLIDAY INN
(Syracuse) SYRACUSE/LIVERPOOL Mary Miller 585–394–7899
18–19 OK/Oklahoma City
(nlm/500) Fun and Games DBC Inc. Jackie Hertweck 405–748–4788
14–19 ON/GARSON
(Sudbury) GARSON COMMUNITY CENTRE Jane Palmer 705–677–5130
18–19 ON/St. Catharines
(0-300) Bridge Centre of Niagara Lucy McEwen 905–468–0052
17–19 SC/West Columbia Tri-City Leisure Center Kathryn Kimmerling 734–476–4046
August/September
31–2 BC/New Westminster Queensborough
(Vancouver) Community Centre Jim McKenzie 604–374–0109
28–3 CA/SANTA CLARA HYATT REGENCY SANTA CLARA Pamela Hughes 916–774–0990
29–2 FL/Delray Beach
(nlm/750) Jourdan’s Bridge Club Ora Lourie 561–585–6223
31–3 FL/St. Petersburg‡ St. Pete Bridge Club Charles Gill 727–363–1136
28–3 GA/AUGUSTA AUGUSTA MARRIOTT
CONVENTION CENTER Robert Coleman 706–833–6496
31–3 IL/Skokie (Chicago) Weber Center Todd Fisher 773–807–5178
31–2 KS/Overland Park Jewish Community Center Trice Massey 913–980–1399
31–2 KY/Paducah Robert Cherry Civic Center Dennis Rose 270–853–0344
31–3 MN/Minneapolis Twin City Bridge Center Teri Blu 952–881–0427
31–2 ND/Fargo El Zagel Clubhouse Mary Shaw 701–238–8504
28–3 PA/MONROEVILLE MONROEVILLE CONV. CTR
(Pittsburgh) & DOUBLETREE HOTEL Mary Paulone Carns 724–897–7526
28–2 RI/WARWICK CROWNE PLAZA Helen Pawlowski 413–530–1278
28–3 TX/RICHARDSON
(Dallas) RENAISSANCE HOTEL Tomi Storey 214–244–8333
31–3 TX/El Paso Decker Bridge Center Peter Peca Jr. 915–581–1637
31–3 WA/Olympia Washington Land Yacht Harbor Demeter Manning 360–972–3127
September
1–3 ON/Toronto Holiday Inn Toronto Yorkdale Ann Shaw 905–855–7177
7–9 AB/Calgary Clarion Hotel and Conf. Centre Dorothy Mersereau 403–245–4536
6–9 AK/Anchorage
(nlm/500) Anchorage Bridge Center Timothy Marx 907–344–8778
6–8 AL/Huntsville St Mary’s Catholic Church Flo Staggs 256–534–3669
6–8 BC/Sidney (Victoria) Mary Winspear Centre Tony Farr 250–598–0662
3–9 CA/COSTA MESA (OC) HILTON COSTA MESA Ron Lien 626–695–5409
Eight GOLD RUSH events in Mid-Flight Pairs (0–3000) ....................1 & 7 • Bracketed teams typically are round robins
GOLD RUSH Pairs .............................1 & 7
six days for 0–750 MP players Hornets Side Series (1st, 2nd of 4) .......... 1 / 7
within groups of 7 or 8 teams, with the top
and/or bottom brackets played as Swiss.
Famous Mid-Atlantic Hospitality Non-LM 49er & 499er Pairs ................. 1 / 7
Stratified Swiss Teams ................................7 • Open events, including side series, are
stratified 0-750, 750-3000, 3000+ unless
Tournament Co-Chairs: THURSDAY, OCT. 25 otherwise noted
Arnold Hoffmann (980) 254–7476 Thur-Fri Compact Knockout ................... 9 am
ajhoffmann@carolina.rr.com • A/X strats are 5000/5000+
Continues 9 am Friday
Marilyn Goodrich (980) 322–4684 Lake Norman Side Series (3rd of 5) ........ 9 am • Mid-Flight: 1500/3000 (no player over 3000)
mgoodrich@goodrich-hendry.com Sunrise NLM 49er & 499er Pairs .......... 9 am
A/X Swiss Teams ...............................1 & 7 • Gold Rush strats: 300/750 (gold points for
750 strat overalls and section tops)
Partnerships: Mid-flight Swiss Teams (0–3000)...........1 & 7
Alice Gray (704) 947–8942 GOLD RUSH Swiss Teams ..................1 & 7 • Non-Life Master 49er and 499er games
alicegray44@hotmail.com Stratified Open Pairs ...........................1 & 7 stratified at director’s discretion
JoAnn Massey (704) 880–4553 Hornets Side Series (3rd, 4th of 4) .......... 1 / 7
NLM 49er & 499er Pairs ..................... 1 / 7 • Single-session pairs always accommodated
joannmassey7@gmail.com
Stratified Swiss Teams ................................7
July
7–8 MA/Barnstable (0-500) Barnstable Intermed. School B.E. Lacy 541–301–4183
6–8 TN/NASHVILLE (nlm/750) VANDERBILT BRIDGE CLUB Shannon Sloan 615–973–3920
13–14 AL/Montgomery (nlm/500) Montgomery Duplicate BC Linda Tarver 334–320–8430
10–11 MN/Detroit Lakes (nlm/500) St. Luke’s Episcopal Church Donna Lombardini 360–600–0459
12–14 MT/HELENA (nlm/750) RADISSON HOTEL Stephen Visocan 406–461–2534
12–15 TX/Houston (0-300) Westside Bridge Academy Jennifer Breihan 713–553–6814
13–15 TX/Dallas (0-200) Bridge Academy of No. Dallas Donna Compton 214–394–5830
21–22 OH/Rocky River (nlm/500) Rocky River Memorial Hall Judy Spooner 440–238–2846 Summer NABC in Atlanta GA
21–22 OR/Portland (nlm/750) Portland Bridge Club David Castles 503–706–4286 July 26–Aug. 5, 2018
28–29 KY/Lexington (nlm/500) Lexington Bridge Club Andra Gyor 859–221–8209
27–29 MN/North St. Paul (0-500) Bridge Center of St. Paul Stephanie Miller 651–490–5430
August
4 CA/San Diego (nlm/500) Seven Oaks Comm. Center Art Foeste 608–274–6185
1–2 FL/Deland (0-300) Deland Bridge Club Lynn Berg 386–736–6228
4–5 NM/Albuquerque (nlm/500) Duke City Bridge Center Steven Lockwood 505–715–0067
11–12 CA/Fresno (nlm/500) Fresno Bridge Center Laura Da Costa 559–999–2825
10–12 CO/LOVELAND (nlm/750) LARIMER CO. FAIRGROUNDS John Grossmann 719–233–9464
11–12 MT/Great Falls (nlm/750) Big Sky Bridge Club Catherine Ayres 303–335–8756
9–12 NC/Durham (nlm/500) Triangle Bridge Club Chris Moll 504–495–7485
10–12 NC/Hendersonville (nlm/500) Hendersonville Bridge Center Nick Weedman 828–693–5300
12 PA/York (nlm/500) Bridge Boardroom Edward Scanlon 717–434–3298
© 2018 by American Contract Bridge League. All rights reserved. Contents of this magazine may not be reproduced in any manner without written consent from the publisher. Mention of any product
does not constitute endorsement by the Bridge Bulletin. Bridge Bulletin assumes no responsibility for return of unsolicited manuscripts, photos, art, or cartoons, and reserves the right to reject any editorial or
advertising materials. Unsolicited materials should be accompanied by a self-addressed, stamped envelope. ACBL, ACBLSCORE, Bridge Bulletin, masterpoint and the ACBL logo are registered trademarks
of American Contract Bridge League. All rights reserved.
It is Bridge Bulletin policy not to accept advertising from persons or organizations believed to be unreliable or financially irresponsible. We are not responsible, however, for the performance of advertisers,
the delivery or quality of their merchandise or services, or the legality of any particular program. On cruise ads, we suggest you check to make sure duplicate bridge will be offered on the cruise you desire.
Regarding investment ads, we recommend that you check with your financial adviser before acting. ACBL Management reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to refuse any advertisement.