0% found this document useful (0 votes)

33 views3 pages

Sindh Revenue Board Government of Sindh

1. The document discusses a pending litigation case before the Sindh High Court involving M/s Noor Enterprises Hyderabad and the Sindh Revenue Board. 2. The case centers around M/s Noor Enterprises' failure to pay sales tax before and after registering with SRB, despite bank statements showing revenue receipts of Rs. 24,248,364 involving sales tax of Rs. 3,248,364. 3. The document recommends pursuing the case, as the taxpayer claims he was a PTCL employee and the transactions were personal, not business related, but he did not provide complete records for reconciliation. An opinion is sought on further action.

Uploaded by

tashkeel

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

0% found this document useful (0 votes)

33 views3 pages

Sindh Revenue Board Government of Sindh

Uploaded by

tashkeel

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

You are on page 1/ 3

SINDH REVENUE BOARD

GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Note Sheet (01)

Subject: EVALUATION & SCRUTINY OF PENDING LITIGATION BEFORE

COURT AND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SRB.

1 Reference may kindly be made to the e-mail received from Cluster-in-Charge (Unit-34)
and to the letters dated: 21st September, 2021 and letter dated: 3 rd June, 2021 as attached
with the e-mail on the subject. Copies of the letters are attached as Annex-A.

2 In this regard, as per the list provided in the e-mail and received from the Legal Wing
SRB following cases are pending before Honorable High Court of Sindh at Karachi and
Case(s) pending before Appellate Tribunal SRB. Details and facts of the cases pending
before the Honorable High Court of Sindh are as under:
SST
Total
Issue amoun
S.N Penal Tax
SNTN Name of person Involve Tax Period t Remarks Opinion
o ty Involv
d involve
ed
d
1 S185411 M/s Noor Enterprises Show- May-2015 to 3,248,3 262,4 3,510,7 M/s Noor RP claims
9-4 Hyderabad cause Dec-2018 64 18 82 Enterprises he was
for non- Hyd employee
payment registered of PTCL
of SST with SRB and
before on transaction
and after 30.01.2018 s in the
registrat under account
ion with principal were not
SRB service related to
category of business
Contractor activity but
of Building to his
(tariff retirement
heading and other
9814.2000). personal
Thereafter, amount.
RP filed He has not
NULL provided
returns for complete
the tax record for
periods Jan- reconciliati
2018 to on. And
Nov-2018. the
Whereas, reconciliati
the bank on report
statement submitted
showed before
revenue Com(Appe
receipt of als and
Rs.24,248,3 Appellate
64/- Tribunal
(involving was not
SST given any
Rs.3,248,36 considerati
4). Govt on. The
dues were case also
Rs.2,069,57 involves
5/- were the
recovered question of
through law as the
bank tax periods
attachment. involved
Moreover, are before
OIO was set registration
aside by . Also the
Com RP claims
(Appeals) refund of
mainly on
the basis of
audie alterm
partem and Rs.2,069,5
credit 75/- on the
entries; basis of
whereas the orders
order passed by
passed by Com(Appe
Appellate als) and
Tribunal Appellate
mainly on Tribunal.
the basis of Therefore,
SCN before it is
registration. recommen
Therefore, ded that
AT held tax the case
be may be
recovered pursued.
from
withholding
agents.

3 File submitted, for your guidance and further necessary action.