FDA 2016 P 2559 0009 - Content
FDA 2016 P 2559 0009 - Content
ECT FEATURES
Pulse Configuration Constant current, bi-directional, square pulses
Internal Tests Treatment pulses into internal 30OU load and
checked for pulse width, frequency, duration
and energy. Safety features are also self-tested .
Energy Measure Delivered energy is measured, based on actual
current and voltage delivered in each pulse, so
as to be inherently correct for entire range of
dynamic patient impedance .
Patient Impedance Range (to start) 100-5000 ohms nominally.
Allowed Voltage Range for proper ECT delivery 50-400 volts .
Protection Protected against paddle-to-paddle or other
short-circuit conditions, and open circuit
conditions.
Visual Indicator Three-color LED gives green for Stimulus
Control enabled; yellow for Treating ; red for
Stimulus Delivery fault.
Audible Indicator Tones provided for pre-treatment and treatment
warnings .
POWER REQUIREMENTS
115 volts nominally, 50/60 Hz @ .25 A Typical (idle) to 2.7 A max (treat), or
230 volts nominally, 50/60 Hz @ .13 A Typical (idle) to 1 .4 A max (treat)
98
OPERATING CONDITIONS
Temperature, operating 41 to 95° F / 5 to 35° C
Relative humidity, operating 30 to 70%, non-condensing
REGULATORY QUALIFICATIONS
The sPECTRuM 5000 series of products comply with the standards listed when connected to an
external personal computer (as verified during EMC testing). If connected to other devices, it is
the user's responsibility to confirm that the device still complies with the listed standards .
UL Classified
cUL Classified
Designed and tested to:
UL 2601-1, 2 Dec 1994
CE Certification '
Designed and tested to:
IEC 601-1, Medical Electrical Equipment, general requirements for safety, 1988
IEC 601-1, Amendment 1, 1991
IEC 601-1, Amendment 2, 1995
IEC 601-2-14, Medical Electrical Equipment, Specifications for electroconvulsive therapy
equipment, 1989
IEC 601-1-2, Medical Electrical Equipment. Electromagnetic compatibility, 1994
IEC 601-2-25, Medical Electrical Equipment. Particular Requirements for the Safety of
Electrocardiographs, 1993
IEC 601-2-26, Medical Electrical Equipment. Particular Requirements for the Safety of
Electroencephalographs, 1994
Accessory equipment connected to the analog and digital interfaces must be certified according
to the respective IEC standards (I .E . IEC 950 for data processing equipment, and IEC 601-1 for
medical equipment). Furthermore, all configurations shall comply with the system standard IEC
601-1-1 . Everyone who connects additional equipment to the signal input or output ports config-
ures a medical system, and is therefore responsible that the system complies with the require-
ments of the system standard, IEC 601-1-1 . If in doubt, contact the technical service department,
or your local representative .
ECT PARAMETERS
New Ultrabrief
Q models Models Four Parameter Sets : Set 1 Set2 Set 3 Set 4
Stimulus Current in 100n-LA increments 500-800 mA 500-800 mA 500-800 mA 500-800 mA
Frequency in 10-Hz steps 20-90 Hz 20-60 Hz 20-60 Hz 20-120 Hz
Pulse Width in .10 msec steps 0.5-1 .0 msec 0.5-2 .0 msec 0.5-1 .0 msec 0.3-0.37 msec
Stimulus Duration in .25- .5 steps 0 .5-4 .0 sec 0.5-3 .0 sec 0.5-6.0 sec 0.5-8.0 sec
Charge 5 .0-576 mC 5.0-576 mC 5.0-576 mC 3.0-568.3 mC
Energy Q 220 ohm patient impedance 0.6-101 .4 joules 0.6-101 .4 joules 0.6-101 .4 joules 0.3-100.0 joules
New Ultrabrief
M models M Models Four Parameter Sets : _Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4
Stimulus Current 800 mA 800 mA 800 mA 800 mA
Frequency 20-90 Hz 20-120 Hz 20-60 Hz 20-120 Hz
Pulse Width 1.0 msec 1.0 msec 1.0 msec 0.3-0 .38 msec
Stimulus Duration 0 .18-4.0 sec 0.18-3.0 sec 0.18-6.0 sec 0.5-8 .0 sec
Charge in 100 settings 5 .8-576 mC 5.8-576 mC 5.8-576 mC 5.8-576 mC
Energy © 220 ohm patient impedance 1.0-101 .4 joules 1.0-101 .4 joules 1 .0-101 .4 joules 1.0-101 .4 joules
99
MONITORING SPECIFICATIONS
EEG/ECG/OMS PATIENT INPUTS (5000 models only)
Maximum Number of Channels 6
EEG Trace Restoration Automatic rapid return to display
EEG Lead-Off Detection Current = 30 nA DC
EEG Lead-Off Indication Trace disappears, Restore button provided when
any selected/ displayed EEG channel is
unhooked
EEG Channel Gain 5000 x from optional analog output (+/- 10%)
EEG Input Range, AC 2mV p-p max .
EEG Input Range, DC +/- 200mV
EEG Frequency Response 1 .4 to 48 Hz band pass (-3dB)
EEG Common Mode Rejection For 10V RMS, 50/60 Hz input having 200 pF
source capacitance, feeding unbalanced 51K/
.047 uF input network, resultant signal will be
< 1 mV p-p R.T.I. with notch filter off, and
< .1 mV p-p R.T.I . with notch filter on.
EEG Noise <_ 15mV p-p R.T.I . with notch filter on .
EEG Display/CHART RECORDER Gain (see chart on next page)
EEG Input Impedance > 2.5 MS2 single-ended Q 10 Hz.
EEG Protection Against ECT Pulses Provided (requires patient monitor cables w/ 1k
series resistors)
100
EEG SCREEN GAIN SETTINGS (mV/mm)
* "Displayed traces" means the total number of traces on the LCD screen,
including EEG, ECG and OMS .
h
b 1. .050 .025 .010 .005 .002 '
w
a 2. .100 .050 .020 .010 .004
A
A
** "Displayed traces" means the total number of traces on the Chart
Recorder printout, including EEG, ECG and/or OMS.
i
ii
vr
See also the section on Error Messages in this manual for additional input on identifying and
clearing problems . Machines will need servicing mainly for errors that users cannot clear by
themselves . These will appear as numbered errors, and the user will need to consult the factory
for assistance.
Static impedance indicates OVER, Scalp electrodes have insufficient contact area, or
or gets PATIENT IMPEDANCE insufficient electrode gel, or are not connected to
INCORRECT message. the patient, or cable is broken .
RESTORE button appears. a. Insure all selected leads are displaying traces .
b. De-select disconnected leads in the
LCD and CHART TRACE MENUS.
c. Lead connections to cables are
scrambled or defective .
d. A non-snECTitvtvi type cable is used.
e. Cable is plugged into wrong connector.
f. A very old electrode is being used .
g. OMS is unplugged, or defective.
102
Problem Description Possible Problem or Solution
Paper prints from CHART Check to see that paper roll is so inserted that
RECORDER, but no printout is paper feeds off underside of the roll, and is laid
produced. over the top of the recorder door. Thermal paper
will print only on one side. Scraping thermal
paper rapidly with a finger nail should leave a
black mark.
LCD is too dark/too light. Use the contrast control buttons on the COPY-
RIGHT and MAIN MENU displays to lighten or
darken the display.
LCD or CHART RECORDER trace Check the appropriate lead for good connections
data is not displaying . from the sPECTRuM to the patient.
Touch Screen buttons do not work. If the unit has Membrane Switches to the left of
the LCD, use those instead .
(there is no touch screen) .
- -
103
These maps depict the routine display sequences on the SPECTRUM Q-model .
Pre-Treatment Displays Map M-model displays will show different parameter configurations .
Error message displays and most variations are not shown.
L21B CE
11/13/87 11/13/97
10:OO :UO : 10:OO:DO. . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . ;. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ;. . . . . . . . .
CENTRAL PROCESSOR REVISION V1i1 .8.CEQA60P CENTRAL PROCESSOR REVISION V7;.1 .8.CEQ60AP
DARK
SAFETY PROCESSOR REVISION V7:1 .6
.miomro-------------------------1
soM
TIMER
10:00:00
. MENU 10:OO:0o
TIMER MENU
ECG ;
.#1
. . ._ . . . . . . . ._ . . . . . ., . . . ., . . ._ . . . . . ._ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PRESS STIMULUS BUTTON
` FORTREATMENT ~
EEG
.
- : oMS : I _. . . _ _
1880
ohms I
K
300 : _ < _ ._ . _ _ .. .
50 mc : . 0.6J. 0 .220 ohms
ohms : l ~
0.5 msec 20 Hz ; 0.500 sec : 500 mA
. . . . . . . . . :. . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . : . ~. . . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . .
5.0 mC 0.6 J: 0 220 ohms
0.5 msec . 20 Hz 0.500 sec : 500 m71
To Treatment
: . .. .L . .. . ._ . : . ..._ . .STIMULU$-ABOUTTO OCCl1R: :i. . ... . . . . .. . .. .
displays
. ... . .: . ... .. . . .. . ... .:. .._ ... .._.. . ;.... . . ... ... ..:. .. . ... ... ... . .: . ... .. . .. . ... .:. . .. . ... . .. .. .
Displays Map
1 ~ ~---~-STiM .AbEO: 25%i1KELY--~ °°~ 1
EST. STIM. LVL. :2 2T (42%) 1
/
1
/
1
1
1
1
/
300 1
/
ohms : ' 1
/
. . . ._ . . . . . .. . .., . .. . .. . .. . . . . . .. . .. . .__ . . .. . .: ._ . . .. . .. . .._ .; .._ .. . ._ .. . . .. . . . ELAPSED TIME
. .. . . . . .. . . . ;..._ . . .._. . .. ; . . . . ..0:01
. . . . .. . . . 1
/
5.0 :mc 0 .6'J 0 : 2200hms /
/
0 .5 msec 20 14z 0 .5001sec 500 tRA /
/
/
/ 1
/ 1
L
1
/ TREATMENT RESULTS
- - .1
/
. . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . .STATIC . . . . . . . .:4YNAMIC . . . . . . .: . . . . . . . .
1 0:00
CHARGE 5 : 5 mC TRACEI ' . ITIMERI 10~01 I MENU
/ ENERGY : 0 .6 : J :
0 .60220
/ IMPEDANCE. :. . . . .300 :. . . . . . . . . .: . .245. . . :. . . . . .ohms . . . . . . TREATMENT RESULTS
1 PULSE WIDTH 0 .5 : ~ 0 .5 - msec
.
.~'. .STATIC _ . . .~'.DYNAMIC. . .
/ FREQUENCY : 20 ~ : 20 Hz : CHARGE ~ ~. 192~ ~I 192 -. mC
DURATION . : .0,500 0,500 :~ sec .
From Pre-Treat
! ENERGY ~ 33.80220 ! 24.6 ~I 1 '.
/
300 : I CURRENT 500 : ~ 500 ~ MA IMPEDANCE ~' 640 ~ - . . . ~ ! 180 -' . . ohms . . ~
1
displays ohms : '. PULSE WIDTH 1 .0 '. '. 1 .0 '- ms6c
FREQUENCY 60 60 H.
/
. . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . :. . . . . . . . . . :ELAPSED
. . . . . . . . .;. . .TIME
. . . . . .. . .0:01
.... . . . - DURATION -I. 2.000 2.000. ~I . . sx . . . .
/ 5.0 :mC 0 .6J ® 220 ohms 640 i CURRENT .~ 800~. ~. 800 ' mA
ohms l
1 :ELAPSEDTIME 0:01 .
0.5 rrisec 20 Hz 0 .500 sec 500 mA
1 / 192 .0 mC' - 33.8 J 0 ' 220 ohms
1
1
(If EEG monitoring menu option is set to
/ /
/ / OFF, then only this display appears .
/ No EEG data screen is then available .)
To Pre-Treat
/ /
/ / displays
To Pre-Treat
/
displays ~8c 1]6b0011E ---------- '
:00 [
t
r
DONE TIMERI '0 :~ C MENU
lGbtl~OOI/M
------------- CHARGE 5 ; 5 me
ENERGY : 0.60220 ~ 0 .6 ; J :
I #1,... . .I~Y.~.~~:::T ..T..~.-.y....p i..y... . .y._ .y ... p. . :.v IMPEDANCE,9.. . ... .300 . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .i . .306 . . . .i .. . . .. . .ohms . .. . . .. . . .
PULSE WIDTH 0.5 : 0 .5 : msec
DELIVERING STIMULUS
10-1 300 :
.,OMS
. .. . . . . . .. . . .. .,..; . .. . . . . . . . . . .; . ... . . . .. . . .. ;. . . .. . . ..- --
300
FREQUENCY` 20 :
DURATION
CURRENT ~
. .. . .i. . .. . . .0.500
500 ;
. . . .. . .. . . .;
: 20
. . .OS00
~: 600 :
.
:
:. . . . . . . .
Hz :
.sed . . .. . ... . ... . ..
MA
L~ ohms : ohms
;... . .. . . .. . .. . . ,. . . . . . . .. .. . . . ; . .. . ELAPSEDTIME , .. . . . . . . . . . : . 0.. :01
. .. . . .. . :ELAPSED TIME .O".01 . .. .
Activates further 5 .0 Ii1C 0.6: J 0 ; 220 ahms 5 .0 :mC : 0 .6'J ! : 220 ohms
treatments 0 .5 Risec 20 Hz ' 0 .500sec 500 iRA 0 .5 msec 20 Hz 0.500 sec ? 500 mA
EEG #2 Opalnmwu ~G
CHARTTRACES : , ` ©
# CHANNELS: ©
USE . EEG1 . FDFt LEFT FRONTAL/MASTGIp . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . On 4000 models with Membrane Switches, the
USE EEG2 FOR RIGHT FRONTAL/MASTOID Parameter Selection menu is the only menu
available .
: MECTA Corporation
19799 SM. 95th Avenue, Suite B, -Bldg. D, Tualatin, OR 97062
b
b
z
v
~c
Additional Monitoring Channels 8/5/09 5:10 PM
~~ T I
.; ! ~~
f(~ ,}z(y)j' j' .. . )]tf[/y/1~~~., ~
. ~ . ...i I~` ~f y~.J ~._ A h..-1 .4 ' ~ i '+..>' 3 'K i a "4 . , ~ 1 I't . Y .~ " ;~'~...1 i R
",
Home » Products » ~Ni»,C;l ruhi GLJiCES s> Options » Additional MonitorinG vin-
ck to enlarge
Request tor Sf_~fVice ()c1ute
I time, simultaneous monitoring of up to eight channels : 4 EEG,
and 1 Optical Motion Sensor and duplicate EEG traces .
Page 1 of
http ://www .mectacorp .com/additional-monitoring-channels .html
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
8/5/09 5:52 PM
Clinicians - Educational Materials
; (( r-~~
e~ Meetings You are logged in as Robin Nicol [Log View Cart )) Items in Cart : 0
IaQM refers to U.S ./Canada
IIdT refers to all other countries
Standard of Care
CLINICAL PUBLICATIONS
Page 1 of
http://www.mectacorp .com/clinician-educational-material .html
Clinicians - Educational Materials 8/5/09 5 :52 PM
Back to Top
Page 2 of
http ://www .mectacorp .com/clinician-educational-material .html
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
MECTA Corporation - Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Clinician 8/5/09 5:57 PM
Clinician
Ccmt,)(,'t Ils
Featured Videos
SHOCK
A documentary film by Brad t?sborne and based upon the book by Kitty Dukakis
and Larry Tye . 02406 AMS Production Group, Inc . All Rights Reserved .
PUi chasf'
Page 1 of
http ://www .mectacorp .com/clinician .html
I'ECTA Corporation - Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Clinician 8/5/09 5:57 PM
~i .F:.t:CFt!?-
t't~1"~.i! ~t~'1
~'FiFR,~1'k'
ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY
Under exclusive distribution from MECTA Corporation . Produced by Dartmouth-
Hitchcock Medical Center . 02001 Dartmouth -Hitchcock Medical Center. All Rights
Reserved .
..
; (~'` i,,_ t
~ ~. ~ i..., l~~l. ~t ~ t .< t', ~ ...1 4
. -- ) I t
~.~. c~ ._~
1 .
E~ C_i~~~,,~' ~--, ~.~~'._x~.m
Request for Setrvice C}uot~~ Biological Psychiatry The Journal of ECT Brain Stimulation
2 . Kalinowsky, L .B ., and Hoch, P .H . : Shock Treatments and Other Somatic Procedures in Psychiatry, New
York: Grune & Stratton, 1946 .
3 . American Psychiatric Association Task Force on ECT : Electroconvulsive Therapy, Task Force Report #94 .
Washington, D .C . : American Psychiatric Association, 1978 .
4. Blachiey, P ., Denny, D ., Fling, J ., Nioulton, C . : A new stimulus generator and recorder for e6ectroconvuisive
therapy, Unpublished Manuscript, 1974 .
5 . Fink, LVI . : Convulsive Therapy: Theory and Ara New York : Raven Press, 1979 .
6 . Weiner, P..D . : ECT and seizure threshold : Effects of s lus waveform and electrode placement. Biological
Psychiatry, 1980 ; 15 :225-241 .
7 . Crowe, R. : Current concepts. Electroconvulsive therapy--a current perspective . New England Journal of
Medicine, 1984, 311 :163-167 .
8 . Weiner, R .D . : Does CCT cause brain damage? Behavioral Brain Science, 1984, 7 :1-53 .
9 . tdlaiitz, S ., Sackeim, H .A . (Eds) : Electroconvulsive Therapy.- Clinical and Basic Research Issues . New York
Academy of Sciences, New York, 1986 .
10 . Weiner, R .D ., r-togers, I-1 .J ., Davidson, J .R ., et al : Effects of stimulus parameters on cognitive side effects .
Page 1 of
http ://www .mectacorp .com/clinician-standardofcare .html
Clinicians - Standard of Care 8/5/09 5:59 PM
11 . Sackeim . H .A ., Decina, P ., Kanzier, M ., Kerr, B ., and Malitz, S . : Effects of electrode placement on the
efficacy of titrated, low-dose ECT. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1987, 144 :1449-1455 .
12 . Sackeim, H .A ., Decina, P ., Portnoy ; S ., Neeley, P., and Maiitz, S . : Studies of dosage, seizure threshold, and
seizure duration in ECT . Biological Psychiatry, 1987 . 22 :249-268 .
13 . Sackeim, H .A ., Decina, P ., Prohovnik, I ., and Malitz, S . : Seizure threshold in ECT : Effects of sex, age,
electrode placement and number of treatments . Archives of General Psychiatry, 1987, 44 :355-360 .
14 . Weiner, R .D ., Coffey GE . : Indications for use of electroconvulsive therapy, in Review of Psychiatry, Vol 7 .
Edited by Frances, A .J ., Hales, R .E . Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press, 1988, 458-481 .
15 . Prudic, J ., Sackeim, H .A., and Devanand, D .P . : Medication resistance and clinical response to
electroconvulsive therapy . Psychiatry Research . 1990, 31 :287-296 .
16 . American Psychiatric Association : The Practice of ECT: Recommendations for Treatment, training and
Privileging . First Edition . Washington ; D .C . : American Psychiatric Press, 1990 .
17 . Devanand, D .P ., Verma, A .K ., Tirumalasetti, F., and Sackeim, H .A. : Absence of cognitive impairment after
more than 100 lifetime ECT treatments . American Journal of Psychiatry, 1991, 14£i : 929-932 .
21 . Krystal, A .D ., Weiner, R .D ., McCall, W .V ., Shelp, F ., Arias, R ., and Smith, P . : The effects of ECT stimulus
dose and electrode placement on the lots] electroencephalogram : An intraindividual placement on the ictal
electroencephalogram : An intraindividual cross-over study . Biological Psychiatry, 1993, 34 :759-767 .
25 . Sackeim, i-I .A., Long, J ., Luber, B ., Moeller, J .R ., Prohovnik, L, Devanand, D .P ., and Nobler, M .S . : Physical
properties and quantification of the ECT stimulus : I . Basic principles . Convulsive Therapy, 1994, 10 :93-123 .
27 . Krystal, A.D ., Weiner, R .D ., Coffey, C .E . : The ictal EEG as a marker of adequate stimulus intensity with
unilateral ECT . J. Iti.'europsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 1995, 7 :295-303 .
29 . Krystal, A.D ., Weiner, R .D., Coffey, C .E ., McCall, W.V. : The effect of ECT treatment number on the ictal
EEG . Psychiatry Research, 1996, 62 :179-189 .
30 . Krystal, A .D ., Weiner, F": .D ., Gassert, D ., McCall, W.V., Coffey, C .E ., Sibert, T., Hoisinger, T . : The relative
ability of 3 ietal EEG frequency bands to differentiate ECT seizures on the basis of electrode placement,
stimulus intensity, and therapeutic response . Convulsive Therapy, 1996, 12 :13-24 .
31 . Sackeim, H .A ., Luber, L ., Katzman, G .P ., Moeller, J .R ., Prudic, J ., Devanand, D .P ., and Nobler, PJI .S . : The
effects of electroconvulsive therapy on quantitative EEG : Relationship to clinical outcome . Archives of General
Psychiatry, 1996, 53 :814-824 .
32 . CJlfson, M ., Marcus, S ., Sackeim, H .A., Thompson, J ., and Pincus, H .A. : Use of ECT for the inpatient
treatment of recurrent major depression . American Journal of Psychiatry, 1998, 155 :22-29 .
33 . Krystal, A .D ., Cof(ey, C .E ., Weiner, R .D ., Halsinger, T . : Changes in seizure threshold over the course of
electroconvulsive therapy affect therapeutic response and are detected by ictal EEG ratings . J. Neuropsychiatry
& Clinical Neurosciences, 1998, 10 :178-186 .
Page 2 of 3
http ://www.mectacorp .com/clinician-standardofcare .html
Clinician~ - Standard of Care 8/5/09 5 :59 PM
35 . McCall, W.V ., Reboussin, D .M ., Weiner, R .D., and Sackeim, H .A. : Titrated, moderately suprathreshold
versus fixed high-dose right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy : acute antidepressant and cognitive effects .
Archives of General Psychiatry, 2000, 57 :438-444 .
37 . Krystal, A.D ., Holsinger, T ., Weiner, R.D ., Coffey, C .E . : Prediction of the utility of a switch from unilateral to
bilateral ECT in the elderly using treatment 2 ictal EEG indices . The Journal of EC7", 2000, 16 :327-337 .
38 . Krystal, A .D ., Weiner, R.D., Lindahl, V ., Massie, R. : The development and retrospective testing of an
electroencephalographic seizure-quality based stimulus dosing paradigm with ECT. The Journal of EC7`, 2000,
16 :338-349 .
39 . Nobler, M .S ., Oquendo, Pv9 .A ., Keyeles, L .S ., Malone, K.M ., Campbell, C ., Sackeim, H .A ., and Mann, J .J . :
Decreased regional brain metabolism following electroconvulsive therapy . American Journal of Psychiatry,
2001, 958 :305-308 .
41 . American Psychiatric Association : The Practice of ECT: Recommendations for Treatment, Training and
Privileging . Second Edition . Washington, D .C . : American Psychiatric Press, 2001 .
4;5 . Prudic, J ., Olfson, M ., Marcus, S .C ., Fuller, R .B ., and Sackeirn, H .A. : Effectiveness of electroconvulsive
therapy in community settings, Biological Psychiatry, 2004, 55 :30'1-312 .
46. Sackeim, H .A, : The convulsant and anticonvulsant properties of electroconvulsive therapy : towards a focal
form of brain stimulation . Clinical Neuroscience Research, 2004, 4 :39-57 .
48 . Sackeim, H .A., Prudic, J ., Fuller, R . . Keilp, J ., Lavori, P .W. ; and Ulfson, M . : The cognitive effects of
electroconvulsive therapy in community settings . Neuropsychophanrracology, 2007, 32 :244-254 .
50 . Spellman, T., Peterchev, A.V., Lisanby, S .H . : Focal Electrically Administered Seizure Therapy : A Novel form
of ECT Illustrates the Roles of Current Directionality, Polarity, and Electrode Configuration in Seizure Induction .
lVeuropsychopharrnacology, 2009, 34 .
. .. .
Home G Products l Clinician I Serviue I Contact I Sitemap
©2009 MFCTA Carnnration . All Rights Reserved
Page 3 of
http ://www .mectacorp .com/clinician-standardofcare .html
Clinicians - Training and Fellowship Information 8/5/09 6 :00 PM
' ?
1 ~\ t I , s " f ' t ~` L~. ~~i (
~ t,. ! Fi a ,;1 ~ t-
; .. i ,,
.,
,j/ i ~%.. ~i .~ ~.~~3 ,; `V t -,
~ , t ~~q t`~. ..) i.~r~',~ . J! \X~~ .l
, _'..I~'~ 3-,
k.-, IAN ~E I L.
gs You are logged in as Robin Nicol [Log Out] View Cart » Items in Cart: 0
DOM refers to U .S ./Canada
IfiT refers to all other countries
t Standard of Care
Page 1 of
http ://www .mectacorp .com/clinician-training .html
EEG Data Analysis 8/5/09 5 :15 PM
k Clinical Accessories
cCliltr7c1 Us
Click to enlarge
RecttrF, ~rt for .fviCE' ()UCY1E3
I Krystal AD . The clinical utility of ictal EEG seizure adequacy models . Psychiatic Annals .
1998 ;28 :30-35 .
2 Krystal AD MD MS, Weiner R D MD PhD: ECT seizure duration : reliability of manual and
computer-automated determinations . Convulsive Therapy 1995 ;11 :3 :158-169 .
Iw~ EEG Data Analysis data sheet
`Duke U.K. Patent #2 304 196 B - U.S . Patent #5,626,627
M DOM (Under exclusive license from Duke University)
EEG Data Analysis data sheet
INT
THE ONLY DUKE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPED AND PATENTED
ANALYSIS FEATURES . MECTA IS THE ONLY COMPANY LICENSED
TO INCLUDE THE DUKE UNIVERSITY EEG SEIZURE QUALITY
MEASURES IN ITS PRODUCTS .
Th ;,se are trln c,nl ;i Fxistinc! EvCT indt :U ier~_lr)t,ed with c:tuai
nliri~a! stirriulus ctcsinn ~jmd ii,eatnii,nt ~E. ;>t :on ;, da ;a :>ho :an to
outco^ie .
Page 2 of'
http://www.mectacorp .com/eeg-data-analysis .html
Hand Held Electrodes 8/5/09 5:22 PM
1 1,1 () *11vS
- n
Remote Monitor Softb^Jare© Four styles are available for use with a spECTrum EGT device :
MECTA RMS MANAGER*
MECTA EMROc For Unilateral Treatments - Single handle with or without a Remote
P Sturdy Hospitial Cart Button
Trum Devices
Clinical Accessories
Contact Us
Single Hand-Held Electrode with Remote Single Hand-Held Electrode without Remote
Fteqtitlst for ()itcltation configured with a headband with electrode
Rt?ctrrestforservice ottoic
For Unilateral and Bilateral Treatments - Dual handles with or
without a Remote Button
Dual Hand-Held Electrodes with Remote Dual Hand-Held Electrodes without Remote
configured with electrode
Page 1 of
http://www .mectacorp .com/hand-held-electrodes.html
,MECTA Corporation - Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) 8/6/09 1 :47 PM
You are logged in as Robin Nicol [Log Out] View Cart » Items in Cart : 0
DOM refers to U.S ./Canada
MECTA Corporation does not INT refers to all other countries
provide medical advice, nor do we
sell our products to anyone but
licensed clinicians and hospitals .
Redefining Electroconvulsive Therapy
Please contact your local mental
health provider, Veteran's hospital, MECTA Corporation has defined the highest standard of
or University hospital for information excellence in the field of ECT neuromodulation devices
about electroconvulsive therapy through evidence-based research since its inception . A
(ECT) . Contact 911 in case of a breakthrough by Dr . Paul Blachley with MECTA ECT
mental health emergency . research in 1973 at Oregon Health Sciences University
produced the first and only, monitored (EEG/ECG), brief
pulse ECT devices - MECTA C and D. Subsequent
Sign up to become .1 research at Columbia University was implemented into the
I`AECTA Service Subscfiber third generation MECTA SR and JR digital devices which
were introduced in 1985, and they utilized the first RUL
ECT, multiple dosing schemes and titration . 4e
Sign i.lfr 14) expeciRe
In 1998 controlled research from Duke University and
Clinical Accessories ~'trtiers
Columbia University was integrated into the current
MECTA spECTrum 5000'&` and 4000 devices, the first and only EEG Data Analysis- feature, 3s and the
spECTrum ULTRABRIEF@ 0.3 ECT 49 which dramatically minimizes cognitive effects . These advances
Contact US continue to lead the field .
MECTA ECT has advanced the highest standard of excellence for over thirty-five years . ECT continues to be
the only neuromodulation modality providing up to an 80°lo response rate. 41 We are proud that MECTA's
ftecplest fur outotation innovative device designs, which have been utilized worldwide in peer reviewed, randomized, double-blind
studies, have resulted in optimized patient outcomes through four generations of ECT devices .
Request for Service t)ttttte Design All MECTA devices include extensive redundant hardware
and software testing to verify that they are operating correctly . The
safety of these devices is unparalleled, and as such these devices
are an advance that will impact the safety and effectiveness of
the ECT treatment.
" U .S . Patent #5,755,744 - U .S . Patent #6,014,587 - U .K . Patent
#GB 2 307 413 B
** Duke U .K . Patent #2 304 196 B - U .S . Patent #5,626,627
Page 1 of 2
http://www.mectacorp .com/home.html
MECTA Corporation - Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) 8/6/09 1:47 PIv1
Page 2 of
http : / /www.mectacorp .com / home . html
MECTA EMR 8/5/09 5 :30 PM
~ ._ .4
Optical Motion Sensor New health IT mandates require digitization of patient medical records .
MECTA EMRO, an MS Access T" - based, networkable electronic
~ EEG Data Analysis medical record, will revolutionize the data acquisition of your ECT
treatments . The spECTrum 5000 alphanumeric data, physiological
P Remote Monitor Coftwarea monitoring and patient data inputted by psychiatrists, anesthesiologists
and nurses are imported into six permanent ECT medical records that
~ MECTA RM5 MANA.GER© can be saved as pdfs on your PC laptop or desktop computer . Improve
patient safety and privacy, contain costs and eliminate paperwork with
~ MECTA Efv4ROG
MECTA EMR .
Sturdy Hospital Cart
COt1ltlCt (IS
~Click to enlarge
Request for Service Ouote
ECTA EMIR data sheet iNT I ie spECTrum physiological data imports directly into EMR. An
Mtc fill feature prevents needless inputting .
t ,.
~~ Clinical Accesso
Contact US
,Click to enlarge
PTedtyE!~~st for SenAcrr otjofie~
Optical Motion Sensor is a tool used to detect intra-muscular motor
movement following initiation of a stimulus .
to
patl~'rli. .
Page 1 of
http ://www .mectacorp .com/optical-motion-sensor .html
MECTA Corporation - Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Products 8/6/09 12 :34 PM
-(,~::~i F -)DI-1 ~=TS ;.~ L Irtd I=-.l f'~;'~1 `~E ¬~~~'i S:~ ~
Nome » Products
No other ECT manufacturer provides a proven evidence based methodology as simple and effective to use as
the spECTrum ULTRABRIEF@ (0 .3 ms) ECT feature. This feature was designed and tested at Columbia
University in the late 1990s, results were reported4s,4s and it was introduced as a feature into MECTA
spECTrum ECT devices in July of 2003 .
Right unilateral (0 .3 ms) ultrabrief six times seizure threshold ECT is equivalent in efficacy to a robust form of
bilateral ECT with little sign of cognitive deficit and is simplified by the use of the MECTA spECTrum titration
tables . Stimulus dose titration tables are included with each purchase .
No other ECT device implementation of' an ultrabrief feature is based on peer reviewed, randomized, double-
blind studies . Only spECTrum ULTRABRIEF (0 .3ms) ECT is highly efficient at the lower range, with patients
demonstrating seizure thresholds at 5 mC, and can treat the patient across the entire range .
Page 1 of 2
http://www.mectacorp .com/products .html
MECTA Corporation - Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Products 8/6/09 12 :34 PM
Only MECTA offers hospitals a state of the art ECT device and ultrabrief option that provides the highest
benefit by reducing side effects for patients .
Page 2 of 2
http ://www .mectacorp .com/products .html
Remote Monitor Software 8/5/09 5 :12 PM
.iI _ G 1A f n''S N1/11,1~v~,(, ; i_f `' ior ~utnr,'i :~tF d imp :~itation c ;f I .,~I :;
ifa fi =: irtn a n i>x"i mc~h:~ v2 ~~~til~ ; ~irul : ; 'tsy to-u :_,c:
C~ick to enlarge
ItFyctttestfor Service 014(Ae
MECTA RMS MANAGER is a powerful database program to
manage ECT treatment data .
Page 1 of
http ://www .mectacorp .com/rms-manager .html
MECTA spECTrum ECT Devices - spECTrum 5000Q® 8/5/09 5:05 PM
.
S R~=.:..~' t
IV.j k, () i4``10
._ 14
[!L.IC++, L( NI .- I AN E ;~`:' 1,, r_ i~ ~ht TAiW T
~ spECTrum 4000MM
~ Starter Kit
~ Options
Clinical Accessories
Contact Us
The spECTrum 5000QO is MECTA's top-selling device . It offers maximum flexibility to treat with four
ECTrum Brochure individual parameter sets of Pulse Width, Frequency, Duration and Current . The treatment dosage is set
using the four knobs beneath the LCD touch screen so that the user can easily see and quickly choose the
best treatment option to maximize efficacy and reduce side effects . The spECTrum ULTRASRIEF© (0 .3 ms)
pulse width settings and titration tables are included with all MECTA devices .
The base unit includes a choice of two channels of EEG or/and one EEG/ECG arrangement. Add up to four
more channels of monitoring for four channels of EEG, one ECG and one Optical Motion Sensor (QMS) .
EEG Data Analysis, Remote Monitor Softwarea, MECTA RMS MANAGER© and MECTA EMRO software
options may be added for a fully featured device .
Individualize patient treatments for safety and effectiveness with the 5000's nine menu options : Main,
Patient Data, Date & Time, LCD Traces, LCD Gains, Chart Traces, Chart. Options . EEG Data and the
Parameter Selection menus . One menu display is available in the 4000 models . The LCD touch screen
provides the user with an easy interface to set menu options .
The new 5000 models have been enhanced with lighter-weight RoHS (lead-free) cases that provide
enhanced durability (3 Ibs . lighter) . The new robust handle ensures easy repositioning . Touch screen
advanced technology offers increased sensitivity and clarity .
MECTA devices also include extensive redundant hardware and software testing to verify that they are
operating correctly . The safety of these devices is unparalleled, and as such these devices are an advance
that dramatically impact the safety and effectiveness of the ECT treatments .
,.r : :r:erc> rna;:imt!n~ fl_z~xibi~it,r and Ch~~ ~Nidtat ranr:3~r ,~f trr: ;arr)~~ni_
: f)=JrySTlt,i£ifS Is (iia~m'a'1 for ieCiIJCt!On of ,ilfJ~E9-Lf~"-4CI5
Page 1 of 2
http ://www .mectacorp .com/spectrum-5000Q .html
MECTA spECTrum ECT Devices - spECTrum 5000Q® 8/5/09 5 :05 PM
Vvi.en cnh ::n :;ed data cat)tr .!re irs rc:~7uired eifhc :r ihrough,
physiological ir!oni oring or recordin,t tr=saiment ar!cJ ; ;;rr !?nedical
infor!nai:ior!
1'Jlrr~ vit3udl . e~ .sy to use rnenus ~ :+c< :e ;:sed by the LCD touc ;Pi
screen ,o individualize paticrit E:rc:r~ln7cnts . No hard to find
menus
Page 2 of
http://www .mectacorp .com/spectrum-5000Q .html
MECTA spECTrum ECT Devices - spECTrum 5000M'" 8/5/09 5 :06 PM
NE
~ 'rti,.;~~ a ~r-IE
HN f,.--IAN S~ I { .E
p- spECTrum 40000T"
~ spECTrum 4000MTr'
Starter Kit
y Options
Clinical Accessories
CQrrFaet Us
The popular spECTrum 5000M T`°' offers dosing simplicity with one single Stimulus Intensity knob . This varies
1, spECTrum Brochure Frequency and Duration simultaneously, to control Energy and Charge . For those used to a single stimulus
knob, the 5000M model is the best option in dosing flexibility, while retaining~arameters that maximize
efficacy and reduce side effects for the patient . The spECTrum ULTRASRIEF° (0 .3 ms) pulse width settings
and titration tables are included with all MECTA devices .
The base unit includes a choice of two channels of EEG or/and one EEG/ECG arrangement . Add up to four
more channels of monitoring for four channels of EEG, one ECG and one Optical Motion Sensor (QMS).
EEG Data Analysis, Remote Monitor Softwarea, MECTA RMS MANAGERa and MECTA EMR© software
options may be added for a fully featured device .
Individualize patient treatments for safety and effectiveness with the 5000's nine menu options: Main,
Patient Data, Date & Time, LCD Traces, LCD Gains, Chart Traces, Chart Options, EEG Data and the
Parameter Selection menus . One menu display is available in the 4000 models . The LCD touch screen
provides the user with an easy interface to set menu options .
The new 5000 models have been enhanced with lighter-weight RoHS (lead-free) cases that provide
enhanced durability (3 Ibs . lighter) . The new robust handle ensures easy repositioning . Touch screen
advanced technology offers increased sensitivity and clarity .
MECTA devices also include extensive redundant hardware and software testing to verify that they are
operating correctly . The safety of these devices is unparalleled, and as such these devices are an advance
that dramatically impact the safety and effectiveness of the ECT treatments .
Page 1 of 2
http ://www .mectacorp .com/spectrum-5000M .html
MECTA spECTrum ECT Devices - spECTrum 5000MT°° 8/5/09 5:06 PM
Page 2 of
http ://tnrww .mectacorp .com/spectrum-5000M .html
MECTA spECTrum ECT Devices - spECTrum 4000QT" 8/5/09 5:06 PM
~ spECTrum 4000QTl'
f~ spECTrum 4000MTM
~ Starter Kit
~ Options
Clinical Accessories
contact IN
This re-designed spECTrum 4000QTtA is more economical, light-weight and portable than the 5000 . The
pECTrum Brochure 4000Q T`" model offers flexibility with four parameter sets of Pulse Width, Frequency, Duration and Current.
The treatment dosage is set using the four knobs beneath the LCD touch screen so that the user can easily
4000Q/4000M data sheet DOM see and quickly choose the best treatment option to maximize efficacy and reduce side effects for the
patient . The spECTrum ULTRABRIEF© (0 .3 ms) pulse width settings and titration tables are included with all
MECTA devices .
4000Q/4000M data sheet INT
As the ECT section of the 5000 devices, it offers cost effectiveness without h siolo ical men still
ensures that the clinician has all of the technology, safety and effectiveness of the 5000 spECTrum .
!; cost-effectivwititi: ss is a I :rriority
Page 1 of 2
http ://w+nrw.mectacorp .com/spectrum-4000Q.html
MECTA spECTrum ECT Devices - spECTrum 4000QT" 8/5/09 5:06 PM
Page 2 of
http://www .mectacorp.com/spectrum-4000Q .html
MECTA spECTrum ECT Devices - spECTrum 4000MT"° 8/5/09 5:16 PM
spECTrurn 5000M
TM spECTrum 4000M
~_ spECTrum 4000QTM
~ spECTrum 4000MT'.°
Starter Kit
f Options
A Clinical Accessories
Contact (Js
This re-designed, economical and light-weight spECTrum 4000M'N' offers dosing simplicity with one single
,~ spECTrum Brochure Stimulus Intensity knob . This varies Frequency and Duration simultaneously, to control Energy and Charge .
For those used to a single stimulus knob, the 4000M model is the best option in dosing flexibility, while
4000Q/4000M data sheet DC3M retaining parameters that maximize efficacy and reduce side effects for the patient. The spECTrum
ULTRABRIEF© (0 .3 ms) pulse width settings and titration tables are included with ail MECTA devices .
4000C!/4000M data sheet INT As the ECT section of the 5000 devices, it offers cost effectiveness without h siolo ical monitorin , but still
ensures that the clinician has all of the technology, safety and effectiveness of the 5000 spECTrum .
'T GA,
Page 1 of 2
http ://vvww.mectacorp .com/spectrum-4000M.html
MECTA spECTrum ECT Devices - spECTrum 4000MT°"
contact Us
Page 1 of
http ://www .mectacorp .com/spectrum-features .html
MECTA spECTrum ECT Devices - Starter Kit 8/5/09 5:29 PM
10
~M .. :\',
KIT'>
~ spECTrurn 4000Q'" An extensive starter kit is included at no charge with the purchase of
any spECTrum 5000 or 4000 ECT device (kits may vary according to
~<. spECTrum 4000MTM the model ordered) . By supplying everything the clinician and biomed
need to get started, MECTA ensures a turn-key startup. Manuals and
~ Starter Kit visual aids, test equipment and clinical supplies assure hospital staff
that treatments can begin promptly, efficiently and efficaciously . All
t Options starter kit items have been designed, tested and approved to comply
with their respective regulatory standards . Therefore, these clinical
Clinical Accessories
accessories offered by MECTA for use with the spECTrum 5000 and
4000 series ECT devices are recommended. Purchase additional
clinical accessories from MECTA for competitive pricing, quantity
Click to enlarge packaging, flexible delivery options and guaranteed quality for all
Contact US starter kit consumable supplies .
Request for otiotallon F -II '~ll :i,~futir P,~IC nitOr r8f~lr' F it~: ¬ liocb.
Page 1 of
http ://www.mectacorp .com/spectrum-starterkit .html
Stimulus Electrode Site Preparation
I. DEFINITIONS
Redux Paste
MECTA part #9800-0002
Manufacturer - Hewlett Packard
Conductive gel with abrasive material
Redux Gel -
MECTA part #9800-0001
Manufacturer - Hewlett Packard
Conductive gel
If you have further questions, we would be happy to refer you to one of the clinicians
who are currently using MECTA products.
SPECTRUM ULTRABRIEF'J
Contact MECTA for pricing and upgrade information and also to order
Titration Tables and/or a new MECTA Instruction Manual containing
the instructions for using these new stimulus dosing parameters.
New! sPECTRuM
MModels Ultrabrief
Four Parameter Sets: Set 1 Set 2 Set Set 4
Stimulus Current 800 MA 800 mA 800 mA 800 mA
Frequency in 100 settings 20-90 Hz 20-120 Hz 20-60 Hz 20-120 Hz
Pulse Width 1.0 msec 1.0 msec 1.0 msec 0.3-0.38 msec
Stimulus Duration 0.18-4.0 sec 0 .18-3.0 sec 0.18-6.0 sec 0 .5-8.0 sec
Charge in 100 settings 5.8-576 mC 5.8-576 mC 5.8-576 mC 5 .8-576 mC
Energy @ 220 ohm patient impedance 1 .0-101.4 joules 1.0-101 .4 joules 1.0-101 .4 joules 1.0-101 .4 joules
The spECTn.im ECT units have been designed and are tested to the highest standards applicable to
non-invasive devices, and have FDA, ISO 9002, and CE mark approvals, as well as other electrical
standard approvals such as UL and cUL . The documents accompanying this letter document the
safety features of these devices .
The Essential Requirements/Standards Checklist lists in detail the Essential Requirements outlined in
the Medical Device Directive of the CE community, as well as the tools and means used to ensure the
design, manufacturing and usage of the units conforms to the requirements .
The Hazard Analysis addresses potential usage hazards . It lists each potential hazard and the
approach used to address that hazard.
The Clinical Risk to Intended Benefit Analysis summarizes relevant research and expert opinions about
ECT usage and practice . It specifically covers the various treatment parameters and energy related
issues of MECTA spECTrum units, including the benefits of 200 Joule machines.
MECTA's manufacturing process includes extensive testing of every single unit shipped from the
factory. In addition, spECTrum units run extensive self-tests every time the unit is turned on and every
time a treatment session ends. Finally, the units continuously run many internal tests whenever the unit
is on . The Overall Quality Plan document summarizes this testing plan.
SpECTrum units deliver a predetermined charge (in milli-coulombs) to the patient . This charge is fully
determined by the current, pulsewidth, frequency and duration of the delivered pulse train. These
parameters are directly controlled by the knobs on the front panel . The expected energy delivery
(based upon a dynamic patient impedance of 220 ohms) is displayed as an aid in choosing the desired
stimulus level, and is limited to 100 or 200 joules depending upon regulatory requirements in the
destination country. During the delivery, both software and independent backup hardware monitor the
current, pulsewidth, frequency and duration . Any deviations from the specified values cause
termination of the energy delivery. In addition, the delivery terminates if the delivered voltage ever
exceeds 400 volts . These safeguards, the most extensive in the industry, ensure correct energy
delivery each and every time. The allowed tolerance on each of these parameters is 10% or less .
Sincerely,
(
John Shaw
Quality Manager
MECTA Corporation
I have enclosed the final report from Dr. Harold Sackeim for you to
review. I would be sending you copies of the bibliography if they are
required under separate cover with the ORIGINAL REPORT . THEY
~: WILL COME BY FEDERAL EXPRESS TO ARRIVE
_ ON FRIDAY OF
~THIS WEEK 6/26'1`1997."-"-;'- ."
JUN-16-1997 18 :29 DEP1 B1U rbruniHiRi
June .12,1997
I am writing to provide a clinical evaluation report of the MECTA SR1/2 and JR1/2
devices used in the delivery of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and produced by
the MEC.'rA Corporation (7015 S_W. McEwan Road, Lake Osweao, Oregon 9~'305,
US). Th?~; report is intended to meet the recjuirej:inents of EC- Directive 93/ ''/EEC
(MDD) . I end the report with a description of my experience with the new MECTA
spECTrn::m 5000 series and compare its features to the earlier MECTA SR1/2 and
JR1/2-
Backgraund
Enclosed is a copy of my curriculum vitae. I have been engaged in clinical provision
and research on ECT since 1979. I am a member of the American Psychiatric
Association Task Force on ECT. I hold a MERIT Award from the National Institute
of Mental Health (USA) for my research on the affective and cognitive consequences
of ECT. i supervise separate clinical services that provide ECT at the New York State
Psychiatric Institute and the Presbyterian Hospital at the Columbia-Presbyterian
Medical Center. I direct a large research pro~am on ECT as Chief of the Department
of Biological Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Professor of Clinical
Psychology in Psychiatry and Radiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons of
Columbia University. I have substantial experience with the use of these NIECTA
devices in routine clinical care and in carefully controlled research projects .
Device Description
The MMC.'TA SRI/2 and JR1/2 devices are used in the administration of ECT. Each
device delivers a constant current, bidirectional, brief pulse waveforrn . . The SRI and
JRl models allow the practitioner to independently vary pulse frequency, pulse
width, tJ~ain duration, and current (pulse amplitude) . The SR2 and JR2 devices
provide a single control that varies stimulus output from 5 to 100°o by line3ily
JUN-16-1997 18 :29 DEPT BID HSY~,H i N i K T 1 1- rvu ,
--
Page 2
increasing pulse frequency and train duration . With the SR2 and JR2 devices pulse
width is fixed at 1 ms and current is fixed at 800 mA. Other than this difference in
control over stimulus characteristics, the four devices are identical with respect to
ECT stimulus delivery features. Common features include the requirement to pass a
"self-test" that assesses integrity of the electrical circuit prior to arming the device for
stimulus delivery, calculation and display of the dynamic impedance encountered
and the energy and voltage administered during delivery of the ECT stimulus, the
capability to use remote hand-held electrodes for stimulus delivery, Qtc.
The SRI/2 models are distinguished from the JRl/Z models by the capacity to record
up to two channels of physiology (EEG and/or ECG), and to display the physiology
and computations of stimulus characteristics on a chart recorder . Specifically, the
jR1/2 models lack these capabilities.
Other details about the particular devices can be found in the SR/JR Domestic
Instruction Manual (pages 1-14,16-17) and the SR/JR British Instruction Manual
(pages 1-13,16-17) . The book, The Practice ofEIectrncn=ulsive Therapy_
Recommendations for Treatment, Training, and Privtleging, by the American Psydtiatric
Association Task Force on ECT (APA, 1990) contains information comparing devices
from various manufacturers (pages 165-166) . Similar information is provided in
the report by the Royal College of Psychiatrists' Special Committee on ECT, The ECT
Handbook (pages 122-148) (RCP, 1995).
Intended use/indications/contraindicatioxns
ECT should be considered only for suitable patients with selected psychiatric
disorders . A combination of factors determine if and when the use of ECT is
considered . These include the patient's diagnosis, the nature and severity of
symptomatology, treatment history, evaluation of the anticipated risks and benefits
of alternative treatments, and patient preference.
By far, ECT is the most commonly administered in the treatment of patients with
major depressive disorder . ECT is widely considered the most effective form of
antidepressant treatment currently available (Sackeim et al., 1993, 3.995). There is
also substantial evidence regarding the efficacy of ECT in acute mania (Iviukh .erjee et
al., 1994) and schizophrenia (Krueger & Sackeim, 1995). .Although ECT may be of
clinical value in other selective conditions, such use is rare.
Page 3
The indications and relative contraindications for ECT are independent of the
device used in ECT administration . Additional information on the indications for
use of ECT may be found in the APA (1990) Task Force Report (pages 6-9, a_9--57) and
the RCP (1995) Special Commit-tee Report (pages 3-23). Information on
contrainiiications may be found in the AFA (1990) Task Force Report (pages 9, 57-59)
and the Royal College (1995) Special Committee Report (pages 26-29).
Over the last 60 years, a wealth of data has accumulated with respect to the efficacy of
ECT in specific psychiatric conditions . Furthermore, there is considerable clinical
experience and a body of research reports explicitly using the MECTA SRI /SR2 and
JR1 /jR2 models .
Page 4
double-blind, randomized research (using the MECTA SR-1 and its predecessor the
MECTA Model D) demonstrated that the antidepressant effects of ECT are contingent
on the anatomic positioning of electrodes and the extent to which electrical stimulus
intensity exceeds seizure threshold (Sackeim et. al.,1987a; Sackeim et al., 1993). 7n other
words, the current paths traversed by the ECT stimulus and the current density within
these paths can profoundly influence antidepressant response . This work definitively
established that technical factors in ECT administration are fundamental in
determining the efficacy of the treatment- .An older literature compared ECT and
aittiaepressant medications in the treatment of major depression . While subject to a
number of methodologicL"qualifications, it is a fair statement that no study has ever
shown a pharmacological or other form of somatic treatment to be superior to ECT in
short-term antidepressant effects . The literature on the antidepressant efficacy of ECT
is critically reviewed in Sackeim (1989) and Sackeirn et al. (1995).
The most comprehensive review of the use of ECT in acute mania was published by
Mukherjee et al. (1994). It appears that approximately 80% of patients with acute
mania will experience marked improvement when treated with ECT. Randomized
controlled studies indicate that the therapeutic effects of ECT in acute mania are
equivalent or superior to those of some pharmacological alternatives (e.g., lithium
combined with antipsychotic) and superior to those of sham treatment (Mukherjee et
al., 1988; Small et al., 1988; Sikdar et al., 1994). In the case of patients in maru.c delirium
where the risk of death is extraordinarily high, use of ECT may be life saving,
The therapeutic role of ECT in the treatment of schizophrenia has been extensively
reviewed by Kt2teger and Sackeim (1995). In brief, relative to monotherapy with
traditional antipsychotic medication, ECT alone appears to be less efficacious .
However, there is a substantial literature that suggests that the combination of ECT
and antipsyrhotic medications may be more efficacious than either treatment alone,
particularly for patients with relatively short duration of illness or acute psychotic
exacerbation . A substantial case series literature suggests that ECT may be of value
when combined with antipsychotic medication when patients with schizophrenia
have manifested medication resistance, including patients who have failed the new
generation of atypical antipsychotics . Expert bodies have recommended that ECT be
particularly considered for medication resistant patients with schizophrenia' who
have prominent affective symptoms or catatonia (APA, ~1990).
Other than the possibility that the efficacy of ECT may be compromised by the use of
ultra-brief pulse widths (i.e ., < .1 ms) (Cronholm & Ottosson, 1963; Robin & de
Tissera , 1982), there is no evidence that the efficacy of ECT for any condition is
contingent on the ECT device that is used . Indeed, comparisons of an older
generation of devices that output an inefficient constant voltage sine wave stimulus
with constant current brief pulse stimulation failed to identify significant differences
in therapeutic properties (Valentine et al., 1968 ; Robin & de Tissera , 1982; Weiner et
al., 1986). A number of controlled trials and clinical series have been -reported with
the IvfECTA SRI or SR2 in the treatment of major depression and acute M,-nia (e.g .,
Iviukhe.rjee et al., 1988; Small et al., 1988; Sackeim et al., 1993; Beale et al., 1994; Lerer
JU:J-16-1997 18 :3.1 DEPT B I U r5 r-rt t rt [rc r
Page 5
et al., 1995). This work has been fundamental in certifying the efficacy of ECT in
these conditions and to document the specific therapeutic effects of these devices .
The most common side effects of ECT are in the cognitive domain, and it is the
potenfral for adverse cognitive effects that limits the use of ECT. The nature of the
cognitive effects of ECT have been the subject of hundreds of investigations, and the
most detailed and recent investigations in this area have used the MBCTA SRI
(Sackeim et al., 1993; McElhiney et al., 1995; Sobin et al., 1995). The cognitive effects
of ECT have been extensively reviewed (Sackeim, 1992).
Briefly, the cognitive side effects of ECT display four key features. (1) Because there is
rapid recovery of cognitive functioning following a treatment session, the magrnitude
and nature of adverse cogrzitive side effects are contingent on the time of
examination. In general, cogrnitive side effects are most severe in the acute postictal
period, particularly at the end of the treatment course. (2) Methods of treatment
administration, including characteristics of the ECT stimulus, can have a profound
effect on the magnitude of short-term or transient cognitive side effects . In particular,
the use of sine wave relative to brief pulse stimulation (Weiner et al., 1986), high
intensity relative to low intensity electrical dosage (Sackeim et al., 1993), bilateral
relative to right unilateral electrode placement (Weiner et al., 1986; Sackeiun et al.,
1993), number and spacing of treatments (Lerer et a1.,1995) and other factors strongly
influence the magnitude and nature of cognitive side effects . (3) Independent of
treatment technique, there are individual differences in the magnitude and
persistence of adverse cognitive effects. It appears that patients with pre-existing
cognitive iznpairment znay be at greater risk for more extensive and persistent
retro;rade amnesia (Sobin et al., 1995). (4) The adverse cognitive effects of ECT are
highly stereotyped. Cognitive functions impaired by the psychiatric condition,
typically those dependent on the adequacy of attention and concentration, cornrnonly
show improvement within a few days of the ECT course, due to symptomatic
improvement. For example, general intelligence measures (IQ) typically improve
shortly following ECT (Sackeun et al., 1992). In contrast, ECT introduces deficits in the
capacity to retain newly learned information (rapid forgetting, anterooade amnesia),
and deficits in the capacity to remember events in the recent past (temporally-gzaded
JUN-16-1yYr :-52
la Lt-1 .olu i
Page 6
retrograde amnesia) . This pattern reflects a classic medial temporal lobe amnestic
syndroine (Sackeim & Stern, 1997). The anterograde amnesia resolves quickly
following termination of ECT, and after several weeks objective evidence of
difficulties in learning and remembering new information is not available (Sackeim,
1992; Sackeim et a1.,1993). Some patients may experience a permanent retrograde
amnesia,;with gaps in memory for events that occurred in the weeks to nwnths
surrounding the ECT course .
As indicated, the adverse cognitive side effects of ECT are partly coritingent on' the
characteristics of the ECT stimulus . The constant current brief pulse stimulus used
in the IvLECTA SR1/SR2 and JRl/JR2 models is associated with a superior cognitive
side effect profile relative to the stimulus administered by sine wave devices (e.g.,
Weiner et al., 1986) . Due to the capacity with these devices to carefully titrate
electrical intensity to the needs of individual patients (Sackeim et al., 1993; Bea1e et
al., 1994; Coffey et al., 1995), it has also been demonstrated that acute and short-term
cognitive side effects can be markedly reduced (Sackeim et a1.,1986,1993) .
I have had the opportunity to verify the accuracy of the P+MCTA SRl/SR2 stimulus
output characteristics, and other features of the stimulus delivery system (e.g.,
measurement of static impedance, calculation of delivered energy, voltage, dynarnic
impedance, etc.). The methods used to independently test a series of MECTA SRI
and SR2= devices have been published (Sackeim et al ., 1994). In brief, using custom
equipment, we have independently sampled the ECT stimulus administered in
over 2,000 treatments sessions of patients . To my knowledge, on no other occasion
has the stimulus actually administered to patients during ECT been. indepe:nden.tly
verified at this level of resolution. Sampling rate was 100,000 Hz for both current
and voltage, and the complete stimulus train was captured for off-line analysis .
This high resolution has allowed us to determine output accuracy within each pulse
of the delivered stimulus .
7ZIV Page 7
The SRl:/SR2 have the capacity for physiological monitoring, pr:widing two channel,
hard copy of EEG or EEG and ECG. On numerous occasions, I have verified
accuraory of amplifier output on these devices, using standard calibration techniques
with larn6wn signals that vary in frequency and amplitude. Of note, a variety of
studies have used the chart recorded representation of the EEG for manual iratings of
ECT seizures (Nob1eT et al., 1993) or have digitized the analog output of the SR1 / SR2
in quantitative studies of ECT seizure characteristics (Krystal et al. 1996). The fact that
reliable ratings have been obtained and consistent findings reaarding quantitative
EEG features also supports the adequacy of device performance for physiological
monitoring .
The design and construction of the IvIECTA SR1/SR2 and jR1/jR2 provide the
necessary and appropriate features for use in an ECT medical suite. Extensive use of
these devices here at Columbia University and by practitioners world-wide .,
underscores their suitability for ECT practice.
Risk-benefit analysis `
There are a variety of risks associated with administration of the electrical stimulus
in KT, the production of generalized seizures, and the adequacy of physiological
monitoring during the treatment .
Electrical safety. The electrical safety risks of ECT include the possibility of
electrical bums, improper grounding and passage of the ECT stimulus through the
patient's heart, and excessive electrical stimulation of the brain.
Page 8
' Ground faults. A requirement in ECT is that ECG be monitored, given that
cardiovascular complications are the greatest source of morbidity and mortality .
When an independent ECG device is used on a separate ground, and were a ground
fault to develop in the ECT device, there is the theoretical possibility of the ECT
electrical stimulus passing through the patient's heart. The intensity of the ECT
stimulus approaches that used in cardiac defibrillation . In line with expert body
recommendations (APA, 1990), the MECTA instruction manuals explicitly: :review
electrical dangers and steps to minimize risk (e .g., Domestic Manual, page 12) . The
grounding of the MECTA device should never be defeated, the grounding of other
electrical devices in contact with the patient should be verified, and all electrical
devices in contact with the patient should share the same ground. Other precautions
include ensuring that the ECT electrodes are only in contact with the patient and
flammable anesthetics are not used . In testing many MECTA devices, I have never
encountered a ground fault. I know of no instance world-wide where use of one of
these devices has resulted in morbidity or mortality due to electrical injury to a patient.
Electrical dosage. The third form of electrical risk concerns the administration
of excessive electrical dosage during ECT. Markedly exceeding the seizure threshold at
intensity levels beyond that needed to achieve clinical response may augment adverse
cognitivf! side effects (Sackeim, 1992) . The use of a constant current brief plilse
waveforzn by these devices introduces intrinsic safety features . First, the gxeater
efficiency of the brief pulse waveform relative to sine wave stimulation is essociated
with a superior profile of cognitive side effects (Weiner et al. 1986) . Second, the .. .
biological and behavioral effects of electrical brain stimulation is determined by
current or charge density (Sackeirn et a1.,1994) . The use of constant current brief
pulses that reach a maximum of only 800 mA provides intrinsic protection. The
maximum current density in neural tissue with these devices is at least an order of
magnitude below the threshold for tissue damage (Devanand et al., 1994). Third, with _
each of these devices the practitioner has a flexible means of individualizing the
delivered charge. Indeed, the instruction manuals for these devices describe two
different methods for individualizing the electrical dose (Domestic Manual pages 34-
39). While adverse cognitive side effects are an unavoidable consequence of ECT,
these devices are desibed to minimize such adverse effects . There is a substantial
empirical literature that supports this claim (Sackeixn et al., 1986, 1993).
A key issue in considering the clinical utility and safety of an ECT device i:~ the
maximal charge it can output and the gradations available to adjust the delivered
charoe to patient needs. The first generation of constant cvrzent brief puLse devices
produced by IvIECTA (Models C and D) were under powered, with a maximal charge
of A-48 mC and maximal energy of approximately 78 j (delivered into 220 ohm.s) .
lhere is remarkable variability among psychiatric patients in seizure thYeshold, the
JUN-16-1997 18 : .54 llEt'l t51u rr?I . . . . . . . . . .
Page 9
The initial versions of the MECTA SRl/SR2 and JRl/JR2 models attempted to
correct this problem by increasing maximal output to 576 mC or 101.4 J (delivered
into 220 ohms). However, the rapidly advancing information on the range in
human seizure threshold and the need to exceed the threshold by a substantial
amount (i.e., 150-450%) to ensure the efficacy of right unilateral ECT (which has a
superior side effect profile), led the clinical community to call for modifications to
these devices (Sackeim,1991) . Indeed, based on these considerations, the Royal
College of Psychiatrists Special Committee called for 1,200 mC being the minimum
maximal output of an ECT device (RCP, 1995). Modifications were then made to the
SR1/SR2 and JRl/JR2 models which can now reach 1,200 mC.
1n determinTn g the electrical dose to be administered in ECT, two points are key.
First, with constant cuzz'ent brief pulse stimulation, the charge administered is of
consequence and not the energy. It is now widely accepted in ECT that the charge
administered (and consequently charge density in neural tissue) is iesponsi.ble for
neurobiological and behavioral effects (Sackeim et al., 1987c, 1994). Except for
Jl!N-16-199'l 1u ; .55 litri zsIu [ -11 ..- . . . ,
Page 10
limiting the possibility of burns, the voltage administered with the constant c=ent
sdznulus~ (and consequently the energy) is largely irrelevant. Fortunately, with the
constant current devices, variations in the stimulus parameters directly alter the
delivered charge . The energy administered during the treatment cannot be known
beforehand, as it will depend on patient impedance. This consideration is relevant
to evaluating the size of the steps taken by the NLCTA devices in altering dosage .
When current (pulse amplitude) is increased, the size of steps will differ when
computed in units of charge and units of energy. The steps will appear larger in
units of energy due to the squaring of current values.
More 'critically, it is appropriate in ECT that the gradations of steps be larger at higher
absolute doses. Expert bodies generally concur that ideally the electrical dosage
administered in ECT should be a percentage multiple of the initial seizure threshold
determined at the first treatment (APA, .1990; RCP, 1995) . Furthennore, all,:
published methods of empirical dose titration, the most sensitive procedure to
quantify initial seizure threshold, use larger absolute size steps at the top of the
range (for patients with high thresholds) relative to the low end of the range
(Sackeirn et al'., 1987b ; Beale et a1.,1994; Coffey et a1.,1995) . This characteristic of ECT
reflects individual differences in extent of shunting of current away from brain .
Indeed, there is substantial evidence that dynamic impedance during passage of the
ECT stimulus (an indirect measure of shunting) and the minimum charge necessary
for seizure induction (an indirect measure of current density in brain) show a
substantial, inverse relationship (Sackeim et al., 1987c, 1994). Finer gradations at
low relative to high charge is theoretically and empirically justified and is reflected
in the IvIECTA SR1/SR2 and JRl/JR2 models. ;
Medical risks . The medical risks of ECT were summarized eariier . The
procedure is associated with a low rate of mortality. The rate of serious medical
complicitions with ECT is believed to be lower than with some accepted fo:i= of
pharmacological treatment, and patients with complicated medical conditions are often
preferentially referred for ECT (APA, 1990; Sackeim et al., 1995). There is no evidence
that the rates or nature of medical morbidity or mortality vary among ECT devices.
Page 11
experience with these devices confirms their utility in clinical practice . With respect
to the risks of ECT, some classes of risk are independent of the ECT device used as
they are a consequence of seizure induction and not the methods used to induce the
seizure or to monitor physiological function . In the areas of electrical safety,
flexibility in determining electrical dosage, and physiological monitoring, the
MECTA devices are state-of-the-art and provide several safety features not found in
other devices. Consequently, the likely benefits of administering ECT -with these
devices outweigh the risks. .
There are several key advantages of the MECTA spECTrum over previous models .
The spECTrum provides continuous assessment of static impedance (integrity of the
circuit). MECTA SRI /SR2 and jR1/JR2 models required a deliberate self-test to arm
and the devices would stay armed for stimulus delivery until they were shut off.
Practitioiiers could avoid use of this safety precaution by leaving the device powered
up and not conducting the self-test procedure. The spECTrum provides accurate
and continuous values for static impedance, with a more conservative range for
armin g (100-5,000 ohms) than in the MBCTA SRI/SR2 and JR1./JR2 models (200-
10,000 ohms). Under conditions where the static impedance has increased from 800
to 3,000 ohms prior to stimulus delivery the prudent practitioner will now be aware
of this fact and can investigate the cause of this shift (most commonly poor contact
at the electrode/skin interface).
The spECTrum does not permit override in low or high static impedance conditions
and delivery of the stimulus is contingent on the static impedance reading once the
stimulus delivery button is depressed. By decreasing the low pass range to 100
ohms, the rare patients with intrinsically low static impedance are accommodated.
Impedance values below 100 ohrns should reflect a conductive bridge needing
correction . Similarly, I have never encountered a static impedance of 5,000 ohms or
greater that did not reflect lack of integrity of the circuit or poor site preparation . To
iny knowledge, the spECTrum is unique in requiring correction and preventing
stimulus delivery in these circumstances .
JI .IV-lO- .J-) 1
.
1 ~ 1V " JU - I -
Page 12
The spECTrum contains additional safety features that abort stimulus delivery
when voltage or energy thresholds are exceeded. Clinically, this would most likely
occur due to slippage of the electrodes during stimulus delivery, The optional hand
held electrodes are of superior design to previous models, providing greater
assurance that the operator cannot come in contact with the stimulating electrodes .
The computation of the delivered stimulus dosage characteristics is inherently .more
accurate with the spECTrum than the previous SRI/SR2 and JRl/JR2 models. The
spECTrum independently samples voltage and current and the computations reflect
what was delivered to the patient. In the SRl/SR2 and JRl/jR2 models, the'
computations of voltage and energy were partly based on assessments of the .
delivered stimulus, but the report of pulse width, frequency, duration and current
values only reflected the device settings, and not what was actually administered .
For example, premature release of the stimulus delivery button with the older
models could only be determined by noting the mismatch between the energy
calculation and what would be calculated based on the stated values for stimulus
parameters and voltage. The spECTrum provides accurate calculation, and
furthermore, warns the practitioner about instances of premature release .
As I have indicated, the MECTA SRI /SR2 and JRl/JR2 models represented"an
advance for the field of ECT and their benefits outweigh their risks . In my view, the
spECTrum models represent a further advance that will further ensure sale and
effective practice of ECT.
Nobler MS, Sackeim H.k, Solomou M, Luber B, Devanand DP, Prudic J: EEG
manifestations during ECT: effects of electrode placement and stimulus intensity .
Biol Psychiatry 1993;34:321-30 .
Prudic J, Haskett RF, lvlulsant B, Malone KM, Pettinati HM, Stepheris S, Greenberg
R, Rifas SL, Sackeim HA: Resistance to antidepressant medications and short-
term clinical response to ECTt Am J Psyc~iatry 1996;153 :985-92,
Royal College of Pyschiatrists . The ECT Handbook The Second .Report of the Royal
College of Psychiatrists' Special Committee on ECT. Council. Report CR39 . Londorn:
Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1995 .
Sackeim. HA, Devanand DP, Prudic J: Stimulus intensity, seizure threshold, and
seizu.re duration: impact on the efficacy and safety of electroconvuZsive therapy.
Psychiatr Clin North Am 1991 ;14 :803-43.
TOTi-il F, 'I .1
Page 13
References
Beale MD, Kellner CH, Pritchett JT, Bernstein H, Burns CM, Knapp R: Stimulus
dose-titration in ECT: a 2-year clinical experience . Conauls Ther 1994;10 :171-6 .
Coffey CE, Lucke J, Weiner .RD, Krystal AD, Aque M: Seizure threshold in .
electroconvulsive therapy: I. Initial seizure threshold. Biol Psychiatry 1995;37:713-
20.
Devanand DP, Dwork Aj, Hutchinson ER, Bolwig TG, Sackeim HA: Does
electroconvulsive therapy alter brain structure? Am J Psychiatry 199d;151:957-970 .
Krystal AD, Weiner RD, Coffey CE, McCall WV : Effect of ECT treatment number on
the ictal EEG. Psychiat7y Res 1996 ;62:179-89.
Lisanby SH, Devanand DP, Nobler MS, Prudic j, Mullen L, and Sackeim HA:
Exceptionally high seizure threshold : ECT device limitations . Convulsive Ther
1996;12:156-164.
McElhiney MC, Moody Bj, Steif BL, Pru.dic J, Devanand DP, Nobler MS, Sackeinm
HA: Autobiographical memory and mood: Effects of electroconv~ulsive ;herapy.
Neuropsychology 1995;9 :501-517.