EMBE 2022 Part 2
EMBE 2022 Part 2
to proceed obtained
Does
energy savings No
justify
project??
Yes
Yes
Final mix of measures selected;
Financial modeling used to help Draft Energy
price the Energy Service Performance Services Agreement
Contract (ESPC) and optimize profit (ESPC) is developed
and cash flow for selected measures
Client
No
and ESCO
Sign
ESPC
Yes
Project
Implementation
Working Mechanism
A Performance Contract guarantees that the cost savings from an
EE project will pay for the costs of the improvements at a facility.
savings
user’s
Payment to
End
ESCO
Energy Bill
Energy Bill
After the
Before During the contract
contract Transfer of the equipment
Project Start-up (less than life property
Contract signed span)
End of the contract
Monetary Benefits for Client
Procedure for ESPC
Barriers
Regulatory Barriers: absence of Regulatory Mechanism for EE
market & mandatory energy audit
Institutional Barriers: inability of building managers to assess
and guarantee the energy savings on account of these
interventions, non-availability of an appropriate delivery mechanism
& absence of Institutional framework, Lack of coordination amongst
different initiatives-different Government Ministries/departments
Technical Barriers: absence of technological solutions,
unavailability of solutions in local market, absence of secure
payment mechanism, penetration of energy efficient product in the
market
Information Barriers: lack of awareness, Communication Gap
between technical staff and top management, Lack of data on
actual building stock, energy consumption by different sectors,
absence of standard templates for RfP, audit reports, PC, M&V etc.
Financial Barriers: Low energy rate, Lack of energy subsidies,
Lack of access to financing, Non-payment& electricity theft
Difficulties in developing countries
Financial Risk 35
ESCO: Grading Process
137
128
More than 70% ESCOs are with in Grade 1-3 114 129
89
56 58
52
45
42
32 35
23 26 3130 29
20 22 24 23 27
17 25 17 17
1415
9 10 9
6 12
5 3
3 5 64
0 1 4
•Implementation
of EE in buildings,
•municipality,
•agriculture,
•SMEs ESCO
•BLY
•S&L •Capacity
Programme building of
Monitoring/ Resourc
•National EESL SDAs/other
Implementing e Centre
Examination BEE’s stakeholders
•NMEEE programs •Training of
•PAT scheme Energy Managers
•PRGF/ •3L Programmes
VCFEE
•CDM
Consultancy
•Consultancy to
Consultancy SDAs/ Govt.s
Organization
•International
Consultancy
Energy Efficiency in Existing Buildings/ facilities
Submission of
Implementation plan BEE will revise the Star
along with M&V and Rating of building
O&M by ESCO
NO
Existing Vs. Proposed Energy Norms
800000
Existing Annual kWh consumption New Porposed Usage
700000
400000
300000
200000
100000
0
Water CFL FTLs Fans Packaged Halogens Old Timer
Pumping including Acs and MHL portable control for
T5 AC (20) Acs
Functional Area
Investment Vs. Energy Savings
1800000
3000000
2500000
Estimated
1400000
Investment Rs.
2000000 104 Lacs (incl. 1200000
1000000 600000
400000
500000
200000
0 0
Water CFL FTLs Fans Packaged Halogens Old Timer APFC
Pumping including Acs and MHL portable control for
T5 AC (20) Acs
Functional Area
Baseline Usage