0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views4 pages

Wrtten Papre - Evaluation Format 30%

Uploaded by

Melkamu Amushe
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views4 pages

Wrtten Papre - Evaluation Format 30%

Uploaded by

Melkamu Amushe
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Written Report Evaluation Criteria 30%

S. Criteria Weight Points given to each student


N (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

1  Title Page 1
o Title of the project
o Name of host organization
o Name of supervisor/s
o Submitted by (Name of students)
o Date of submission of the report

 Table of Contents 1
 List of tables, graphs, figure

2 Introduction 4

 Presentation of general background


 Major activities carried out in the
organization/project
 Objective of your activities/internship work
 Relation of the organization/project with your
internship activities
3 Description of the Study Site 2.5
 Geographic location
 Climate
 Population
 Land use
 Vegetation

4 Approaches/Methods You Followed 5


 Brief description on methods and
approaches used to carry out activities
 Communication and consultation with the
community and the host organization
 Other sources of data used
Written Report Evaluation Criteria 30%
5 Activities Performed and Field findings 6
 Brief description and discussion of
activities you carried out in the area of
engagement.
 Major constraints in your area of
engagement regarding:
 Data sources/ availability of data,
6 Experience Gained and Lesson Learned 2
 Practical knowledge and skill observed in
the job environment with regards to GIS
application
 Attitudinal change
7 Options and opportunities 2.5
 Community prospective
 Government prospective
 NGO’s prospective
 Experts prospective
 Other potential resources availability

8 Overall Discussions 2

9 Conclusion and Recommendation 1

10 Language:- 1

 Grammar, Paragraph development, punctuation,


etc

11 Overall evaluation 2

 Consistency, relevance, originality and flow of


ideas

Total 30%
Written Report Evaluation Criteria 30%
Written Report Evaluation Criteria 30%
Name of the students evaluated

1. ____________________________________________________________________________

2. ____________________________________________________________________________

3. ____________________________________________________________________________

4. ____________________________________________________________________________

5. ____________________________________________________________________________

6. ____________________________________________________________________________

7. ____________________________________________________________________________

8. ____________________________________________________________________________

9. ____________________________________________________________________________

10. ____________________________________________________________________________

11. ____________________________________________________________________________

Evaluator’s Name:_______________________________Signature:____________________________Date:________________________

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy