Electrical Installation Condition Reporting:: Classification Codes For Domestic and Similar Electrical Installations
Electrical Installation Condition Reporting:: Classification Codes For Domestic and Similar Electrical Installations
Electrical
installation
condition
reporting:
Classification
Codes for
domestic and
similar
electrical
installations
Page 1
Best Practice Guide
Electrical Safety First is indebted to the following
organisations for their contribution and/or
support to the development of this Guide:
BEAMA
www.beama.org.uk
British Gas
www.britishgas.co.uk
Institution of Engineering
and Technology
www.theiet.org
NAPIT
www.napit.org.uk
Published by:
Electrical Safety First
45 Great Guildford Street
SPACES
London SE1 0ES
www.thespaces.org.uk
Email: bpg@electricalsafetyfirst.org.uk
SELECT
www.select.org.uk Website: www.electricalsafetyfirst.org.uk
Electrical Safety First and other contributors believe that the guidance
Several of the photographs in this Guide have been extracted and information contained in this Best Practice Guide is correct, but
from a superseded Electrical Safety First DVD, courtesy of all parties must rely on their own skill and judgement when making
Navigator Productions Ltd. Others were kindly supplied by Nick use of it. Neither Electrical Safety First nor any contributor assumes
Blakeley Electrical and Bradford Metropolitan District Council. any liability to anyone for any loss or damage caused by any error or
This is one of a series of Best Practice Guides produced by omission in this Guide, whether such error or omission is the result of
Electrical Safety First* in association with leading industry bodies negligence or any other cause. Where reference is made to legislation,
for the benefit of electrical contractors and installers, and their it is not to be considered as legal advice. Any and all such liability is
customers. disclaimed.
© Electrical Safety Council. May 2015
Electrical installation
condition reporting:
Classification Codes for
domestic and similar
electrical installations
The aim of this Guide is to provide practical guidance for skilled
persons competent in electrical inspection and testing on the use of
the Classification Codes that need to be attributed to each observation
recorded during the periodic inspection and testing of an electrical
installation for the benefit of the person ordering the report.
The guidance is limited to the range of observations that are likely to
be associated with domestic and similar electrical installations. It takes
into account the publication of Amendment 3 to BS 7671: 2008.
1. Introduction
Every electrical installation deteriorates with use The inspection and testing should be carried out
and time. Therefore, if the safety of the users is at appropriate intervals in order to determine
not to be put at risk, it is important that every what, if anything, needs to be done to maintain
installation is periodically inspected and tested by a the installation in a safe and serviceable condition.
competent person. Indeed, it is recommended in The results of the inspection and testing need to be
BS 7671: 2008 as amended that every electrical clearly detailed in a report. Any observed damage,
installation is subjected to periodic inspection and deterioration, defects, dangerous conditions and
testing (Regulation 135.1 refers). non-compliances with the requirements of the
current edition of BS 7671 that may give rise to
danger should be recorded and appropriately
classified for remedial action.
Page 4
The inspector If the inspector is competent and takes all the
necessary safety precautions including following
the correct procedures, the process of inspecting
All persons carrying out the inspection and testing
and testing should not create danger to persons, or
of electrical installations must be competent to
cause damage to property.
do so.
Past events indicate that persons undertaking
electrical installation condition reporting need
to have extensive knowledge and experience of
electrical installation matters to enable them to
safely and accurately assess the condition of an
existing electrical installation. This is especially
so when they do not have access to the design
or maintenance information relating to that
installation.
Page 5
Periodic inspection and Also, for reasons beyond the inspector’s control,
the inspector may be unable to gain access to parts
testing procedures of the existing installation. For example, it is usually
impracticable to inspect cables that have been
The procedures for periodic inspection and testing concealed within the fabric of the building.
differ in some respects from those for the initial
Such restrictions are likely to result in the inspection
verification of new installation work. This is because
and testing of those parts of the installation being
the subject of an electrical installation condition
limited, or being omitted entirely from the process.
report is usually an installation which has been
energised and in use for some time. Particular Where, during the course of inspection or testing,
attention therefore needs to be given during the an immediate danger is found to be present in an
inspection process to assessing the condition of the installation (from an accessible exposed live part,
installation in respect of: for example), immediate action will be necessary
to make it safe before continuing. However, the
• Safety discovery of the dangerous condition should still be
• Wear and tear recorded in the report and classified accordingly.
Page 6
An immediately dangerous situation - Line
conductor connected to the metallic enclosure
of a light fitting and thermal damage
sufficient to permit access to live parts
Page 7
Observations
The periodic inspection and testing procedures Only observations that can be supported by one or
should identify any damage, deterioration, defects more regulations in the edition of BS 7671 current
and conditions within the installation that give rise, at the time of the periodic inspection should be
or potentially give rise, to danger. The procedures recorded. The particular regulation number(s) need
should also identify any deficiencies for which not be entered in the report (unless specifically
remedial action would contribute to a significant required by the client), but should serve to remind
improvement in the safety of the electrical the inspector that it is only compliance with BS 7671
installation. that is to be considered. Observations based solely
on personal preference or ‘custom and practice’
After due consideration, each such observed safety
should not be included.
issue should be recorded at the appropriate point in
the inspection or test results schedule, and further
detailed in the ‘observations’ section of the report.
Page 8
Classification Codes
Each observation relating to a concern about the
safety of the installation should be attributed an
appropriate Classification Code selected from the
standard codes C1, C2, C3 and FI. Each code has a
particular meaning:
Page 9
In general terms, the FI (Further investigation required)
Classification Codes should Usually, it should be possible to attribute a
Classification Code to each observation without the
be used as follows: need for further investigation.
Page 10
Summary of the condition
of the installation
The summary should adequately describe the
general condition of the installation in terms of
electrical safety, taking into account the specific
observations made. It is essential to provide a clear
summary of the condition of the installation having
considered, for example:
• The extent of any wear and tear, If there are no observations in the report classified
damage or other deterioration as C1 , C2 or FI, it would not be reasonable to
report the overall condition of the installation as
• Changes in use of the premises that have led to, unsatisfactory.
or might lead to, deficiencies in the installation.
The recommended interval until the next
Minimal descriptions such as ‘poor’, and inspection should be made conditional upon all
superficial statements such as ‘recommend a observations that have been given a Classification
rewire’, are considered unacceptable as they do Code C1 (danger present) being remedied
not indicate the true condition of an installation. immediately and all observations that have been
It will often be necessary or appropriate to explain given a Code C2 (potentially dangerous) or that
the implications of an electrical installation require further investigation being remedied or
condition report in a covering letter, for the investigated respectively as a matter of urgency.
benefit of recipients who require additional
advice and guidance about their installation. Where the space provided for the description of the
general condition of the installation is insufficient
For example, where an installation has deteriorated for the purpose and it is necessary to continue
or been damaged to such an extent that its safe the description on an additional page(s), the page
serviceable life can reasonably be considered to be number(s) of the additional page(s) should be
at an end, a recommendation for renewal should recorded.
be made in a covering letter, giving adequate
supporting reasons. Reference to the covering letter
should be made in the report.
Page 11
Examples of the use
of Classification Codes
Page 12
Examples of the use
of Classification Codes
• A public utility water pipe being used as the • All final circuits of the location comply with
means of earthing for the installation the requirements of Regulation 411.3.2
for automatic disconnection, and
• A gas or oil pipe being used as the means
of earthing for the installation • All final circuits of the location have additional
protection by means of a 30 mA RCD, and
• Cross-sectional area of the earthing conductor
does not satisfy adiabatic requirements (that • All extraneous-conductive-parts of
is, does not comply with Regulation 543.1.1) the location are effectively connected
to the protective equipotential
• Absence of a circuit protective conductor
bonding (main earthing terminal).
for a lighting circuit supplying items
of Class I equipment, or connected to • The main RCD or voltage-operated earth
switches having metallic face plates1 leakage circuit-breaker on a TT system
fails to operate when tested with an
• Absence of a notice warning that lighting
instrument or integral test button
circuits have no circuit protective conductor
1
See the Electrical Safety First Best Practice Guide No 1 – Replacing a consumer unit in domestic premises
2
Where the presence of supplementary bonding cannot be confirmed by inspection it may be verified by a continuity test (<0.05 Ω)
Page 13
Examples of the use
of Classification Codes
Page 14
Examples of the use
of Classification Codes
Page 15
Examples of the use
of Classification Codes
• Absence of circuit protective conductors • For inspections carried out after 1 January
in circuits having only Class II (or all- 2016 - Presence of a consumer unit or
insulated) luminaires and switches3 similar switchgear made from combustible
material (e.g. plastic) that is not inside a
non-combustible enclosure and which is:
3
See the Electrical Safety First Best Practice Guide No 1 – Replacing a consumer unit in domestic premises
Page 16
Examples of the use
of Classification Codes
Page 17
Examples of the use
of Classification Codes
• Absence of a reliable earth connection to a • Use of unsheathed flex for lighting pendants
recessed metallic back box of an insulated • Cable core colours complying with
accessory, such as where there is no ‘earthing a previous edition of BS 7671.
tail’ connecting the earthing terminal of
the accessory to the box, and the box does
not have a fixed lug that comes into contact
with an earthed eyelet on the accessory
Page 18
Examples of the use
of Classification Codes
Page 19
Best Prac Best Prac (Issue 2) Best Prac (Issue 2) Best Pracce Guide 5 (Issue 2)
Page 20