Comedy of Humours, According To A F. Scott, Is A Term Applied Especially To The Type
Comedy of Humours, According To A F. Scott, Is A Term Applied Especially To The Type
the 16th c. and early in the 17th. It is quite opposite to romantic comedy which
pictures man as dominated by one marked characteristic of some kind of whim. It
was first cultivated in Gammer Gurton’s Needle and Ralph Roister Doister and Ben
Johnson popularized it in England. In the comedy of humour, the characters are
types and eccentrics while in Shakespearean comedy “there is rather an attempt to
conceal the presence of the types under a semblance of personality.”
When Jonson wrote his plays, the word ‘humour’ had a much more extended
meaning than it has now the four humours of the body described by the old
physicians were supposed to exert their influence upon the mind and in course of
time, the mind as well as the body was credited with its own particular humour. It
meant, at that time, predominant mental characteristics.
Intense Realism
Intense realism is the greatest characteristic of comedy of humours. The characters
here do not escape into the dreamland of romance rather they tread into
contemporary life with its manners, types, foibles and affectations. Ben Johnson
cannot be forgotten because he freed the English comedy from the shackles of
romantic extravagances of Beaumont and Fletcher. He also presented a real picture
of contemporary England. The story of his comedies can be helpful to us in assessing
the contemporary Elizabethan society.
Three Unities
All the three unities of time place and action are observed well here. The action is
confined to one spot and it does not extend over the period of twenty four hours. In
Jonson’s The Alchemist, all the incidents take place inside Love wit’s house or in
front of its door and only in twenty four hours. The comedy of homour has classical
cannon of having single plot without having any subplot there. It has no tragic
motive.
Jonson’s characters usually represent one humour and, thus unbalanced, are
basically caricatures. Jonson distinguished two kinds of humour: one was true
humour, in which one peculiar quality actually possessed a man, body, and soul; the
other was adopted humour, or mannerism, in which a man went out of his way to
appear singular by affecting certain fashions of clothing, speech, and social habits.
His two outstanding works in this kind of comedy are Every Man in His
Humour (1598) and Every Man Out of His Humour (1599); plus minor works like The
Magnetic Lady: or Humours Reconciled (1632). Following the practice of the
Moralities and Interludes, Jonson named dramatis personae aptronymically: Kitely,
Dame Kitely, Knowell, Brainworm and Justice Clement (in Every Man in His Humour);
Fastidious Brisk, Fungoso, Sordido, and Puntarvolo the vainglorious knight, and so
forth (in Every Man Out of His Humour). The indication of character in this fashion
became a common practice and continued to be much favoured by dramatists and
novelists in the 18th and 19th c.
John Fletcher, a contemporary of Jonson’s, wrote a number of ‘humour’ comedies,
and other plays of note from the period are Chapman’s All Fools (c. 1604),
Middleton’s A Trick to Catch the Old One (1605), and Massinger’s A New Way to Pay
Old Debts (1625). Shadwell revived comedy of humours late in the 17th c. with The
Squire of Alsatia (1688) and Bury Fair (1689).
Conclusion
This typical type of comedy is full of contradictory elements. For example, the highly
exaggerated, and therefore, unrealistic characters move about in highly realistic
atmosphere and true to the custom of the society; the turns of speech and the social
peculiarities are realistically brought out in a comedy of humours. In other words, a
comedy of humours, has all the characteristics of a regular comedy, with the
exception of the exaggerated traits or humours of its characters.