0% found this document useful (0 votes)
212 views9 pages

The PTB Simulation Report: User: Chandran Geetha Pramoth Chandran User Email: 200512299@student - Georgianc.on - Ca

The document is a simulation report for a medium product development scenario. It provides information on the user, scenario details, resources, quality requirements, tasks and their modes. The scenario finished within the target date of 13 periods with a total cost of $39,800 and benefit of 88.46%. The 7 tasks were completed using various in-house and subcontractor modes.

Uploaded by

Pramodh Chandran
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
212 views9 pages

The PTB Simulation Report: User: Chandran Geetha Pramoth Chandran User Email: 200512299@student - Georgianc.on - Ca

The document is a simulation report for a medium product development scenario. It provides information on the user, scenario details, resources, quality requirements, tasks and their modes. The scenario finished within the target date of 13 periods with a total cost of $39,800 and benefit of 88.46%. The 7 tasks were completed using various in-house and subcontractor modes.

Uploaded by

Pramodh Chandran
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

The PTB Simulation Report

User: Chandran Geetha Pramoth Chandran


User Email: 200512299@student.georgianc.on.ca
Scenario: Medium Product Development
Created at: Saturday, June 4, 2022 3:39:09 PM
Last simulation run result: Scenario finished
Simulation Time: 13
Target Date: 13
Target Cost: 39000
Simulation Cash: 5200
Total Cost: 39800
Benefit: 88.46
Estimated Cost: 26500
Estimated Finish Period: 13
Scenario Information:
Project Name Number of Target Date Initial Cash Bonus per Penalty per
Tasks Period Period

Project1 7 13 39000 1000 2000

Resource Information:
Name Availa Availa Cost/ Idle Firing Hiring Show Firing Hiring Minim Maxim
ble ble Period Cost/ Cost Cost Up Lead Lead um um
Units Units Period Proba Time Time Units Units
in bility
Lead (%)
Time

Engin 3 3 500 200 100 100 95 1 1 1 6


eers

Quality Requirements:
The PTB Simulation Report

Name Formula Importanc Minimum Desired Maximum Best Mode Evaluation


e Value Value Value

Quality of [HDQ]*[SD 10 0 70 100 Maximum 61.92


the Q]*[HMQ]
Product *[SCQ]*[I
Q]*100

Task Information:
The PTB Simulation Report

Project Task Name Cost of Actual Actual Income Current Selected


Name Split Start Finish Status Mode

Project1 Hardware 0 1 5 0 Finished In-House


Design Hardware
Design

Mode Name Optimistic Most Likely Pessimistic Fixed Cost Engineers Hardware
Duration Duration Duration Needed Design
Quality
[HDQ] (HDQ)

In-House 3 4 5 1000 2 0.95


Hardware
Design

Subcontracto 2 3 4 2000 1 0.6


rA
The PTB Simulation Report

Project Task Name Cost of Actual Actual Income Current Selected


Name Split Start Finish Status Mode

Project1 Software 0 1 4 0 Finished Subcontrac


Design tor B

Mode Name Optimistic Most Likely Pessimistic Fixed Cost Engineers Software
Duration Duration Duration Needed Design
Quality
[SDQ] (SDQ)

In-House 2 3 5 2000 2 0.5


Software
Design

Subcontracto 3 3 3 5500 3 0.95


rB
The PTB Simulation Report

Project Task Name Cost of Actual Actual Income Current Selected


Name Split Start Finish Status Mode

Project1 Logistics 0 0 5 6000 Finished Subcontrac


tor G

Mode Name Optimistic Most Likely Pessimistic Fixed Cost Engineers


Duration Duration Duration Needed

In-House 6 7 9 2000 2
Logistics

Subcontractor 3 5 6 3000 1
G
The PTB Simulation Report

Project Task Name Cost of Actual Actual Income Current Selected


Name Split Start Finish Status Mode

Project1 Hardware 0 5 8 0 Finished In-House


Manufactu Hardware
ring Developme
nt

Mode Name Optimistic Most Likely Pessimistic Fixed Cost Engineers Hardware
Duration Duration Duration Needed Manufacturin
g Quality
[HMQ]
(HMQ)

In-House 2 3 4 1000 2 0.99


Hardware
Development

Subcontracto 3 5 5 3000 1 0.9


rC
The PTB Simulation Report

Project Task Name Cost of Actual Actual Income Current Selected


Name Split Start Finish Status Mode

Project1 Software 0 5 8 0 Finished In-House


Coding Software
Developme
nt

Mode Name Optimistic Most Likely Pessimistic Fixed Cost Engineers Software
Duration Duration Duration Needed Coding
Quality
[SCQ] (SCQ)

In-House 2 3 3 2000 2 0.99


Software
Development

Subcontracto 4 5 7 4000 1 0.9


rD
The PTB Simulation Report

Project Task Name Cost of Actual Actual Income Current Selected


Name Split Start Finish Status Mode

Project1 Integratio 0 8 10 0 Finished In-House


n Integratio
n

Mode Name Optimistic Most Likely Pessimistic Fixed Cost Engineers Integration
Duration Duration Duration Needed Quality [IQ]
(IQ)

In-House 2 2 2 1000 2 0.7


Integration

Subcontracto 2 3 4 3000 1 0.99


rE
The PTB Simulation Report

Project Task Name Cost of Actual Actual Income Current Selected


Name Split Start Finish Status Mode

Project1 Testing 0 10 13 0 Finished Subcontrac


and tor F
Commissio
ning

Mode Name Optimistic Most Likely Pessimistic Fixed Cost Engineers


Duration Duration Duration Needed

In-House 4 6 8 500 1
Testing

Subcontractor F 2 3 4 1500 2

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy