Services OCT 2019 - Complete
Services OCT 2019 - Complete
Who am I?
I want you to take something away for your future career in aviation
In case you feel bored, it`s up to you to leave, but don´t disturb
others who want to follow, listen and learn
Anything else….?
11
Ramp Safety
1. Pre-Services
Check-In, Flight Preparation & Editing, Service- or Ticket-Desk
Activities
2. VHF – Contact
Arrangement of Special Services requested (i.e. WCHR)
Information on Position & Airport restrictions
6. Fuelling
Check-In Agents
Ticket Agents
Load Controller
Ramp Agent
Supervisor
Boosting Competition
Market Clearance
LIBERALISATION …
…is any process whereby a state lifts restrictions on some private individual
activities.
Further:
• Access to central infrastructure at non discriminatory prices
• At least one service provider to be independent from the airport
• Separation of accounts of airport’s ground handling units from other airport business
• Selection of suppliers through tender process by a body independent from managing
body of the airport
•Catering
-Preparation
EU Directive 96/67/EC distinguishes -Storage
eleven ground handling categories
-Strongest Group
Highest Market Shares -Traditionally Network Carriers -Neither controlled by Airport or Airline
Selection of Suppliers
EU Directive 96/67/EC applies to
- Relevant, objective, transparent and non- airports with more than
discriminatory criteria
- 2.000.000 annual pax
- Official tender; selected for a maximum of
7 years
- 50.000 annual tonnes
-Installation of Airport User’s Committee
for handling categories 3,4,5 and 7
100
Competition
– KLM
1/1999
75 – Aero Ground
EU Directive effective
Rates/ margins Competition:
– rate increases – KLM
still possible – Aero Ground Competition:
– Ogden obtained – KLM Competition:
– reasonable
50 margins license – Aero Ground – KLM Competition:
– Ogden – GG AMS – KLM
Rates/ margins: – Ogden – GG AMS
– rates dropped Rates/ margins: – Dutchport – Ogden
dramatically – Stabilisation at „rock-bottom“ – Aviapartner – Aviapartner
(from -20% to -60 % – At best CPI correction
25 in some cases) – 1997 decline in large contracts Rates/ margins: Rates/ margins:
– Further decline in – Slight increase
most big contracts in big contracts
– smaller contracts – Larger increase in
stabilized smaller contracts
0
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002
- No fewer than THREE parties per category at - Right of Member States to impose Transfer
airports with more than 5.000.000 annual pax of Staff
- No fewer than TWO parties per category at - Ground Handling Companies to prove Staff
airports with less than 5.000.000 annual pax Qualifications
- Right to Self-Handle
• Selection of Suppliers
CURRENT SITUATION
• Difficult to operate profitably since the introduction of directive 96/67/EC
• Price decrease of up to 30%
• Monopolies still exist
• Pressure on staff conditions has been increased
FUTURE OUTLOOK
• More competition will lead to decrease in quality
• Lack of “Capacity” will decrease efficiency and productivity levels
• Safety issues will increase on the apron
• Pressure on staff wages will further increase Outsourcing of services
• Staff fluctuation could lead to security issues
Airports
Anke Diana Baumann
54 Ground Services
“Airlines fear that Germany will lobby to protect the interests of the
airports and fear that competition will not increase in the short-term”
CURRENT SITUATION
• Situation in Germany is outdated
• “Bigger” Airlines do not have a real choice
• Handling charges have decreased
• Increase in competition led to increase in quality
• Customer services became main focus of handling providers
• Lack of choice within Germany (3 dominant players)
FUTURE OUTLOOK
• Complete opening of the market demanded in the long-term
• Individual limits at airports
• No minimum quality standards necessary
• Minimum wages and more flexible labourlaws could increase staff dismotivation
• Organizational separation of ground handling division from airport company is a must
• Binding decision in the Airport User’s Committee demanded
Airlines
Anke Diana Baumann
55 Ground Services
“A well-functioning duopoly is better than a non-functioning open market
with low quality levels and pressure on working conditions”
CURRENT SITUATION
• Current framework is working fine
• Administrative efforts and time limitation use up benefits
• Security and safety requirements by European Commission are considered sufficient
FUTURE OUTLOOK
• Complete liberalization is too muchSlow and steady deregulation
• Higher threshold for third license demandedOtherwise pressure on prices
• Decreased entry barriers will lead to quality problems
• Transfer of staff could lead to problems in daily operation
Source: Bombardier
4.0
• 1 near pandemic (SARS)
• 9/11
3.0
20
2.0
1.0
0.0
1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012
M o re ef fic ient , new er generat io n airp lanes w ill rep lac e aging airc raf t
Units
Units
50,000
50,000
46,950
45,000
45,000
40,000
40,000
23,470
35,000
35,000 Growth
30,000
57%
30,000
41,030
25,000
25,000
23,480
23,480
20,000
20,000
17,560
15,000
15,000 Replacement
43%
10,000
10,000
5,000 5,920
0
Retained fleet
2016
2016 2036
2036
Source: Boeing
Source: Boeing
Source: Boeing
Pax @
outside market
Ramp @ Cargo warehouse @
medium outside market small/ medium outside market
Ramp @
small outside market Ramp / cargo @
hub airport
Airline
Pax @
core hub / home airport
business
• Omission of strikes
• Operational interferences
• Market acceptance
- Strong dependence on one carrier
- Possible interference with existing 3rd party business
• Integration process
- Transfer problems
- Cultural fit
- Using synergy potential
- Economic benefits
• Frontier (IAD)
Main
agreement Annex A
Annex B
Annex B
Annex B
Annex B
Annex B
Annex B
FRA Annex B
CDG
LHR
CPH
ARN
JFK
ORD
Under the preamble that both parties know and agree to the
standard main agreement and standard Annex A, only
Annex B has to be concluded.
Aircraft Servicing
Ramp
Aircraft Maintenance
Surface Transport
Catering Services
Security
Anke Diana Baumann
85 Ground Services
IATA Standard Ground Handling Agreement
• Main topics
– E-Ticketing (ET) 100% mid of 2008
– Common Use Self Service (CUSS)
– Bar-Coded Boarding Pass (BCBP)
– Radio Frequency ID (RFID)
– IATA e-Freight in progress
2,500,000,000
2,000,000,000
1,500,000,000
500,000,000
Desk (20%)
-
Y2004 Y2005 Y2006 Y2007 Y2008 Y2008 +
Full Desk Check-in Airline Dedicated SS CUSS
Home printed BP - No Baggage Home printed BP - Baggage
• Advantages
– Passengers: better service because of reduced baggage mishandling
– Airlines: Reduction on costs out of mishandling and compensation
– Airports: faster baggage handling
– Handler: higher productivity because of faster “baggage reconciliation”
• IATA: 15% of Bag Tag Barcodes are read incorrect, with RFID reduction to
about 1%
• Social differences
- No Unions
- No curfew – Dep (e.g. CPA 01:15/ Avianca 03:50)
- A lot of immigrants integration to society difficult (grouping)
- High Staff turnover on entry Level positions (~20% of staff quit
within 3-6m, another 20% within 12m)
• Financial differences
- Life at the „Existence Minimum“
- Minimum wages only Airport demands $12, in Virginia $7.25
(JFK minimum wage 2023 at $19, a few years ago $9 (Check-in agent))
- Ramp Agents often have to have 2-3 Jobs in order to make a living
- Some people work 18hrs and more homeless, no flat/room
• Handling differences
- Check-in systems mainly CUSS from the GH company
- Contracts between GH and Airline have a 60-90 day termination
period over the last years no airline has terminated the GH, but
the GH has terminated e.g. UPS (nighttime handling = higher wages)
Technological
Progress
Benefits:
• Globalisation as a mean to achieve higher levels of profitability,
productivity and efficiency
• Employees achieve a higher awareness of the company - to be part of
a global player
• Customers can rely on the expertise and the quality of a worldwide
network
• Shareholders benefit from the use of synergies within a global network
Risks:
• Difficult integration of various nationalities, mentalities, cultures and
languages
• Difficulty in efficiently coordinating the network activities
• Loosing clear strategic focus by opportunistic market approaches
• Alliances are looking for one supplier at each airport serving all partner
airlines (Single Sourcing)
Centralised KA-Management
- Central office
- Long decision making processes
- Focus is on maximisation of the group profit
- Short-term market tendencies are difficult to meet and specific
customer needs are difficult to satisfy
Decentralised KA-Management
- Decentralised profit centres
- Focus is on profit maximisation of a single company/ location
- Target of group are not taken into consideration
Benefits
- All company units are represented by one department to the
customer (one-face-to-the-customer)
- One manager can sell all services at all airports
- Customer has one specific person to turn to
- Only Key Accounts
- Regional customer still handled by local profit centre
- Target: Development of stable long-term relationships with the top
customers
• Operational data
– Number of handled flights/passengers
– Tons of handled cargo import/export
• Aircraft Damage
– Number and reasons of damages
• Customer Complaints
• Delays – Delay Codes
• Passenger Arrival Services (first bag – last bag on belt)
• Passenger Services (counter opening/ closing, queuing
passengers)
• Ramp Handling
• Environment (Oil/gas consumption)
Module 2: Carriers
What do you want from your Handling
Company?
Module 1: Staff
Preparational Meeting
Module 3: Staff
Can they achieve what you
are asking for?
Average
February
January
July
March
April
June
August
November
October
December
September
First bag GGF Last bag GGF First bag Competitor Last bag Competitor
July
April
March
August
October
November
June
December
September
Average
Anke Diana Baumann
129 Ground Services
IATA Safety Audit
ISAGO
ISAGO
ISAGO
ISAGO
ISAGO
ISAGO
http://www.iata.org/whatwedo/safety/audit/isago/Pages/index.aspx
Anke Diana Baumann
136 Ground Services
IATA Safety Audit
Content:
• Auditors work with Checklists GH has to proof that there is a
SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) or else Referencing
document for each of the items on the list
• Duration 4 days in general (2 days SOP + 2 days OPS), 2
days for renewal
• People involved at GH: e.g. Regional Manager, Department
Head of each area (Stationmanagement, Ramp handling, Pax
handling, Load Control, Training)
• ISAGO Audit is not mandatory, but serves as a means of
reputation
• GH „applies“ for an audit Pool Airlines make an appointment
for conducting the audit at the GH
Anke Diana Baumann
137 Ground Services
IATA Safety Audit
• Revenues
• Problem of complete registration of all events and all work
• Importance of real time control of all work
• Direct input out of existing contracts (rates and work)
• Revenues
– Types of revenues
• Handling as contracted
• Additional workload (e.g. GPU)
• Cargo Handling and warehousing
• Ticket Commission
• Deicing
• Baggage delivery
• Other Services
• Cute/Codeco charges if not included in handling rates
• Revenues
– Problem of complete registration of all events and all work
– Process chain:
• Cost of sales
– Subcontracted Handling like cleaning
– Deicing fluid
– Cute/Codeco charges
– Support from third party e.g. for baggage delivery
• Expenditures 1
– Wages and salaries
– Subcontracted labour
– Social costs
= COL Cost of labour
• Expenditures 2
– Equipment Maintenance
– Equipment running
– Hired equipment
– Other eqmt costs ( e.g. IT etc.)
= Total equipment cost
Anke Diana Baumann
145 Ground Services
Cost components
• Expenditures 3
– Rent
– Rates
– Heat, Light
– Cleaning
– Repair
= Property costs
• Administration
– Concession
– Insurance
– Recharged overheads from headquarter
– Marketing and sales
– Depreciation
– IT
– Training
– Travelling
– Telephone and communication
– Auditor and lawyer
– Etc.
• Budget example
– Either based on last years forecast
– Or white paper budget
• Consists of
– Profit and loss account
– Seasonalisation per month
– Cash flow statement per month
– Balance sheet per month
– Capital expenditures (Capex)
• Monthly reporting
– Budget vs actual
– Month and cumulative
– Financial KPI
– Yearsend forecast
– Revenue and cost components comparable to budget
– Graphs
– Explanations
Basis: Schedule of the airlines handled (STA, STD, AC-Type, in/out nightstop)
Calculation:
Manually for small operations
With the support of IT Tools e.g. Excel-based
Extensive IT support with detailed considering specialities of the
respective airport (SABRE, INFORM etc.)
Procedure
Clustering of AC with same requirements regarding g/h
Fixing of time the equipment or staff is tied with the g/h of an AC
Manual shift input (number of staff, shift length)
Input of absence days per employee and year
Calculation and output as charts and spread sheets