Unit 12: Idea of Quantification
Unit 12: Idea of Quantification
UNIT STRUCTURE
12.1 Learning Objectives
12.2 Introduction
12.3 Propositional Logic and Predicate Logic
12.4 Singular and General Propositions
12.5 Propositional Function
12.6 Quantification: What it is
12.6.1 Types of Quantifiers
12.7 Quantification of Four-Fold Classification of Propositions
12.7.1 Square of Opposition
12.8 Proving Validity and Invalidity: Rules of Quantification
12.9 Let Us Sum Up
12.10 Further Reading
12.11 Answers to Check Your Progress
12.12 Model Questions
12.2 INTRODUCTION
32 Philosophy
introduces special symbols for quantifying. That is why this logic is known
as predicate calculus or predicate logic or quantifier logic. Predicate logic
provides the technique of symbolization of the logical structure of simple
propositions which is different from the symbolic structure of compound
propositions. It also gives us the technique or method for determining the
validity or invalidity of arguments.
This unit also provides us the informations about quantification, kinds
of quantifiers, Symbolizations of A, E, I, and 0 through quantifiers and rules
of quantification theory from which we determine the validity of invalidity of
arguments respectively.
Philosophy 33
34 Philosophy
Philosophy 35
36 Philosophy
universal quantifier are (X), (Y), (Z). They are used to signify the quantity of
'All' or 'Every'. As for example, the general proposition, 'Everything is moving
' can be symbolized by prefixing universal quantifiers as - (X) Mx. It is to be
read as "For all x, Mx", or "Given any x, Mx" or "Given any x, x is moving".
Similarly,
Everything id perfect-(X) Px
Everything is illusive ---(X) Ix
All Humans are mortal ----(X) (Hx ? Mx)
Existential quantifier: Another quantifier is existential quantifier. The symbol
for the existential quantifier is (x). It is used to assert that 'some entities' or
'at least one entity' have a certain property. As for instance - 'something is
solid' can be symbolized by using existential quantifier as- (x) Sx. It is to be
read as 'there is atleast one x such that, x is solid' or for some x, x is solid.
Similarly,
'Something is moving' -- (x) Sx
Ghost exists -----(x) Gx (It means that there is something which is
Ghost.) Some men are honest- (x) (Mx.Hx). The phrase 'there is at least
one x such that 'is called an existential quantifier and is symbolized as (x).
In predicate logic brackets are used to avoid ambiguities. The brackets
indicate the scope of the quantifier.
Variables are of two types. They are free and bound variable. An
unquantified variable is free variable e.g., in the sentence form 'Mx', x is free
variable. On the other hand quantified variable is bound variable. For
example, in (X) Mx, 'X' is bound variable.
Philosophy 37
38 Philosophy
l Quantification of E proposition
E. No humans are mortal. This proposition can be analysed that-Given
any individual thing, whatever, if it is human, then it is not mortal. This
expression can be symbolically formulated as, Given any x, if x is human,
then x is not mortal.
Substituting the horseshoe symbol ' ' for 'if-then', we can express the
symbolic form of sentence as such- Given any x, x is human x is not mortal.
Finally, this symbolic expression can be symbolized as (X) (Hx ⊃ ~Mx)
l Quantification of I proposition
I. Some humans are mortal. This proposition can be asserted that
there is atleast one thing that is human and mortal. This expression can be
analysed as there is atleast one x such that x is human and x is mortal.
Substituting the dot symbol '.' for 'and' we can symbolize the proposition as:
there is atleast one x such that x is human. X is mortal. Using the existential
quantifier (x) we finally symbolize the proposition as: (x) (Hx. Mx)
l Quantification of O proposition
Some humans are not mortal. This proposition can be paraphrased
as there is atleast one thing that is a human and not mortal. Substituting 'x'
for humans in the sentence form we can analyse the propositions as - there
is atleast one x such that 'x' is a human . 'x' is not mortal. Using quantifiers
and propositional function we finally symbolize the proposition as ( x) (Hx.
~Mx)
Philosophy 39
(Sub-altern opposition)
(∃x) (φ x) I O (∃x) (~φx)
Philosophy 41
42 Philosophy
3. Ia. Ha 2. E.I
4. Ha ~Pa 1. U.I
5. Ha 3 Simp
6. ~Pa 4, 5 M.P
7. Ga 3 Simp
8. Ga. ~Pa 6, 7 Conjunction
9. (x) (Gx. ~ Px) 8 E.G
Philosophy 43
1) Copi, Irving M. Symbolic Logic (fifth edition). New Delhi. Prentice Hall
of India ( Private Ltd.)
2) Jain, Krishna(1998). A textbook of logic (fourth Revised Edition)
3) Singh, S. Shyam Kishore. Modern Logic (Vol.1) Lamyana Press
4) Copi, Irving M., Cohen, Carl, Cohen., Priyedarshi, Jetli.,& Monica,
Prabhakar. Introduction to Logic (Twelfth edition). Dorling Kindersley
(India) Pvt. Ltd
44 Philosophy
Philosophy 45
46 Philosophy