Blood of Kings Parte
Blood of Kings Parte
.1 vlhut; . Mimi;
¢1
-la* 4*
O
,is
\
*
/ |
W83 E
II llll
I'll
THE BLOOD OF KINGS
Dynasty and Ritual in Maya Art
THE BLOOD
OF KINGS
Dynasty and Ritual in Maya Art
Linda Schele
Mary Ellen Miller
Photographs by ]stir Kerr
Foreword/Emily ]. Sano ix
Preface/Michael D. Coe 1
Acknowledgments 5
Library of Congress catalogue number: 86-80193
Introduction
Schele, Linda.
The blood of kings.
Bibliography: p, Prologue 9
Includes index.
I. Mayas-Art. 2. Mayas-Social life and customs.
3. Indians of Mexico-Art. 4. Indians of Mexico-
The Modern Invention of the Ancient Maya 18
Social life and customs. 5. Indians of Central
America-Art. 6. Indians of Central America-Social The Characteristics of Maya Art 33
life and customs. I. Miller, Mary Ellen. II. Kerr, Justin.
Ill. Kimball Art Museum. IV. Title.
Fl435.3.A7S34 1986 704.9'09728l 86-80193 Maya Gods and Icons 41
ISBN 0-912804-22-X (pl'ak.)
ISBN 0-8076-1159-X
Chapters
All photographs © ]ustin Kerr. 1985 except where noted. II Kingship and the Rites of Accession 103
Figures 6. 7. III. 3, \Lash, V6, and Plate 40 © President and Fellows
of Harvard College. 1985
Plate 66 © Paul Macapia. 1985
III Courtly Life 133
Figure IV 3, Flare 72 © National Geographic Society, 1975
Plates Ill, 119 © Merle Greene Rohertson, 1975 IV Bloodletting and the Vision Quest 175
Flares 80, 98. courtesy of the Seattle Art Museum
Flare 91, courtesy of the Field Muwum of Natural History, Chicago
Figure II, courtesy ofTlle Baltimore Muwum of Art V Warfare and Captive Sacrifice 209
Figure Vl.6, The Ada Tun hull llertle Fund. © The Art Institute of Chicago
All drawings by Linda Schele except where noted.
VI The Ballgame 241
Drawings from the Corpus of Maya Hieroglyphic lnsm'ptions (Peabody Museum Press) reproduced courtesy of the Peabody
Museum of Archaeology and Fthnology, Harvard University. Figures V.2, V.3: Plates 6Za, 63a, 64a, 65a (1977); Figure VII Death and the journey to Xibalba
V1.7 (1982) © President and Fellows of Harvard College
265
Printed in japan
I
DedUzazed no Giflert G. Griffin
I
This publication has been aided by a generous grant from Inte'rFirst Bank Fort Worth
This publication was issued in connection with the exhibition The Blood of Kings: A New
Interpretation of Maya Art, shown at the Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, May 17_August 24,
1986, and The Cleveland Museum of Art, October 8_December 14, 1986. All objects in the
exhibition are illustrated here in color, with the exception of Fig. 11. For didactic purposes,
several unexhibited works are also illustrated, in Plates 9, 10, 19, 38, 39, 45, 46, 58, 72, 90,
106, 111, 113, 119, 122. Organized by the Kimbell Art Museum, in association with The Cleveland
Museum of Art, the exhibition has been made possible, in part, by grants from lnterFirst Bank
Fort Worth, The Anne Burnett and Charles Tandy Foundation, Fort Worth, and The National
Endowment for the Arts, a federal agency. A federal indemnity was provided by the Federal
Council on the Arts and Humanities.
3;
f I
J
4
J
FOR EWQR D
son make them, as our authors tell us, equal to the great figures of other civilizations. Dr. George Kubler, Professor Emeritus, Department of the History of Art, Yale University
They were a people who had the social organization and the skills to manipulate their
Professor Miguel LeOn-Portilla, Institute de Investigaciones Historicas,
own world. As we continue to look back at them, we may learn why they ultimately Universidad Nacional AutOnoma de Mexico
failed; in the meantime, our respect and wonderment for all they accomplished grows.
Dr. Floyd Lounsbury, Professor Emeritus, Department of Anthropology, Yale University
In February 1985, I encountered a Maya ruin for the first time. At Copan in
Honduras I stood at the top of Temple 11, the most sacred building there, and experi- Mrs. Merle Greene Robertson, Precolumbian Art Research Institute, San Francisco
enced the extraordinary thrill of a sacred site-empty, silent, even partially crumbled, Dr. George Stuart, National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C.
yet strongly imbued with the sense of a world in another time that I could not know. Dr. Gordon Willey, Professor Emeritus, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University
That experience, shared by thousands of visitors to ruins in Mexico, Guatemala, Belize
and Honduras since the end of the nineteenth century, accounts for the fascination As a corollary of the exhibition, the Kimbell Art Museum undertook to publish
with the Maya. Their spectacular cities of palaces and temples built of hewn blocks of an independent study of the Maya based upon the results of the latest scholarly
stone are hardly the only attraction: stately sculpture, pottery painted with lively im- research. The pioneering approach adopted by Schele and Miller led us away from the
ages, beautifully worked jade and shell ornaments, and, most of all, their mysterious traditional format of an exhibition catalogue to a book with a broader purpose. In
hieroglyphic writing are the material remains that speak eloquently of a sophisticated, proposing this idea to the authors, Dr. Edmund P. Pillsbury, Director of the Kimbell,
complex, highly intelligent people. wrote to them as follows:
This volume is published on the occasion of an exhibition by the Kimbell Art I would like to see the publication developed as a book rather than as an exhibi-
Museum in celebration of the Texas Sesquicentennial. The museum has no plans to tion catalogue. The book should include a substantial introduction outlining
build a major collection of Precolumbian art and has no professional in this field on its the previous literature on the subject and placing the new research into a
staff. The idea for the show was presented to me by Mr. Dee Smith, a resident of Fort meaningful context for a general audience. Following the introduction there
Worth and Maya enthusiast who had attended Professor Linda Schele's Hieroglyphic should be eight long chapters, lucidly written, I trust, treating the individual
Workshop in Austin. Intrigued by the idea of an exhibition of the Maya, we invited a
themes of the exhibition. Both introduction and individual chapters could be
Linda Schele to Fort Worth to explore the possibility of such an exhibition. Schele and illustrated with material that is not in the exhibition as well as the pieces that
her colleague, Mary Ellen Miller of Yale, assisted as guest curators for the show; they are shown, accompanied by descriptive notes. At the end of the volume there
created the exhibition structure of eight themes that explore different aspects of the may be a glossary of technical terms, a bibliography, an index, and other rel-
lives of Kings as portrayed in art and prepared the preliminary list of objects to be evant material.
borrowed.
For the exhibition, it was decided that objects should be first and foremost of As project director and general editor of The Blood of Kings, I wish to acknowl-
supreme aesthetic quality and historical interest to do justice to the extraordinary artist edge those individuals crucial to the project: the invaluable Karen King, Curatorial
tic legacy of Maya civilization. Secondly, and equally important, there was a concern Secretary, put the entire text of a four-hundred page manuscript on disk, working sin-
that objects included in the exhibition come from the public sector. This condition, glehandedly through first draft and revisions. She worked, not only under the pressure
although viewed as arbitrary by some and insufficiently restrictive by others, excluded of time and massive volume, but also with characteristic grace. I am grateful for the
from consideration works that might have a future commercial life. in making our advice of Professor Michael Coe of Yale University and Marilyn Ingram, Curator of
selection, we received advice from leading scholars throughout the world. In particular, Education at the Kimbell, who read the entire manuscript and offered many sugges-
we relied upon the counsel and good judgment of those pre-eminent authorities who tions. I owe special thanks to Pat Loud, Slide Librarian, who undertook the task of
agreed to serve on the Advisory Board for the organization of the exhibition: reading the galleys; the staff of the museum library who fielded bibliographical ques»
sons; Registrar Peggy Buchanan, who coordinated loans and photography; Wendy
Gottlieb, who so efficiently handled promotion of the exhibition and book; and Kath~
Miss Elizabeth Benson, Institute of Andean Studies, Bethesda, Maryland
leen Schorn who assisted me through numerous Federal Express deadlines.
Dr. Elizabeth Boone, Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C.
The glorious color photographs by ]ustin Kerr, commissioned by the Kimbell
Miss Elizabeth Carmichael, Museum of Mankind, The British Museum, London Art Museum for this publication, are a tribute to the extraordinary talents of this pho»
Professor Michael D. Coe, Department of Anthropology, Yale University biographer. I wish to thank him, and his gracious wife and able assistant, Barbara, for
His Excellency Federico Fahsen, Former Ambassador of Guatemala to the United States their generous assistance to me and to the authors. The choice of Dana Levy to design
Professor David Freidel, Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas the book was an ideal one, because the complexity of the text and volume of illustrate
sons required the assurance and enormous talent that he brings to his craft. The chat»
Professor Beatriz de la Fuente, Institute de Investigaciones Esteticas,
Universidad Nacional AutOnoma de México lenging task of copyediting the long manuscript was entrusted to Letitia Burns O'Con»
nor of Perpetua Press and her associate Sylvia Tidwell.
Mr. Gillett G. Griffin, Curator of Precolumbian and Primitive Collection,
I deeply appreciate the efforts of Deputy Director Dr. William B. Jordan who
The Art Museum, Princeton University
contributed substantially to the negotiation for loans and to the promotion of the book
x FOREWORD
and exhibition. I also wish to express profound thanks to Edmund Pillsbury for his PREFACE
unstinting support of the project. Dr. Pillsbury recognized the great contribution to be
made to the advancement of scholarship and fully committed the museum to a high
standard in both the exhibition and the book. Without his vision and sympathetic
concern, this project could not have been possible. Finally, to Linda and Mary I wish to
say thank you for countless hours of work under the heavy pressures of full»time aca»
demic schedules, for the use of their drawings and photographs, for their enduring
patience through crises, large and small, and for the contribution of an enthusiastic cc
manuscript that brings the ancient Maya to life. Initially entranced by the lively intel-
ligence of these two women, I have also come to admire and respect them for their LOOD WAS THE MORTAR OF ANCIENT MAYA LIFE," AS THE AUTHORS OF THIS
remarkable strength of character and generosity of spirit. unique volume assure us. Such a statement, based upon the soundest of scholarship,
would have been unthinkable 25 years ago. A virtual revolution has taken place in the
EMILY ]. SANO last quarter century in our knowledge of the New World's most advanced, sophisticated
Kimbell Art Museum I| and subtle civilization, a revolution that reaches its culmination and most definitive
statement in The Blood of Kings.
This intellectual turn-about has taken place on many fronts, but most espe»
cally in epigraphy and iconography. I well remember a day in the year 1959, when the
late, great Tatiana Proskouriakoff- seated as usual in the smoking room of Harvard's
Peabody Museum (she was a cigarette addict)-took me through what she called "a
T
I peculiar patterns of dates," along with associated glyphs, that she had detected on the
carved stelae of Piedras Negras. I was astounded at her accomplishment. She had made
the greatest single advance in the study of the ancient Maya: the Classic Maya inscrip-
tions had become part of history, as _john Lloyd Stephens had foretold in the last cen-
tury, not just records of the passing of time, or of the movements of the heavenly bodies.
So modest and unassuming was "Tania" that she never would have called this the
beginning of a revolution, but so it was.
To continue on a personal note, in March of 1956, my wife and I, then both
graduate students at Harvard and on our spring vacation, found ourselves guests in a
Merida hotel along with Tania. I had just picked up in a local bookshop a Mexican
translation of a work on Maya hieroglyphic writing by a Soviet scholar reputed to have
cracked the script, but otherwise unknown to most Mayanists. The author was Yuri
Valentinovich Knorosov, a specialist in the comparative study of writing systems.
Knorosov had had the audacity to revive the long-discredited "alphabet" written down
in the sixteenth century by Bishop Landa, and had gone on to propose phonetic»syl-
labic readings of various glyphs in the Dresden Codex. I found many of these readings
plausible, and I am convinced that Tania-to whom we lent the pamphlet-did, too,
although then and subsequently she never committed herself to the Knorosov
approach, probably through awe of Eric Thompson, the leading figure in twentieth-
century Maya research and until his death a bitter opponent of the Knorosov school.
My bilingual wife eventually translated into English the bulk of Knorosov's
work, and David H. Kelley took up the cudgel in defense of his approach. Kelley
became the first to recognize the names of rulers spelled completely phonetically in the
Maya inscriptions (for instance, Kakupacal, "Fiery Shield,"at Chic fen Itza), and
made notable advances in the dynastic history of Copan and Quirigua. All subsequent
research on the subject has confirmed the essential correctness of the hypothesis that
the Maya could write everything they wanted to purely phonetically, but never did this
in complete form because of the sacredness and prestige of the ideographs or logograms.
We use the adjective Mayan to refer exclusively to the language: the people are the Maya, and the
subject of this hook is Maya art.
,J PROLOGUE
M;83QAM5g1CA c RIBB NS A
4
The Maya, builders of one of the most fascinating civilizations in the history of
9 * l 14 the world, are not just an archaeological race. There are over two million people who
4
"iv
still speak one of the more than thirty Mayan languages living today in Mexico, Guatef
mala, Belize and Honduras. One of the largest groups of native American peoples to
3
1 \ survive as a coherent group, the Maya still live in traditional communities as well as in
2
modern, integrated societies. More than just the genetic descendants of the ancient
J )
PETEN
Maya, these people retain a mythology, world view, languages and beliefs that have
-< J Nay anlo .
roots in the Precolumbian civilizations of their ancient forebears. As with all native
aECa
8°
0 La#
4:>»-
a
r a American peoples, they struggle to retain their traditional mode of living against the
\ ,I OF pressures and political realities of twentieth-century life.
CHIAPAS SOUTHERN LOWLANDS
HIGHLANDS The ancient Maya lived in an area that modern researchers call Mesoamerica,
\ W
Qs
II
a» )
I
"_,
la \ v.
bloodletting and captive sacrifice; cultivation of maize; the use of cacao as money and as
r
( / \ I
a beverage; folding-screen books made from either fig-bark paper or deerskin; a
f
/
_/'
l
ballgame played in specially built courts; pyramidal architecture; and the sense of a
\< 4 `Re label
/ common cultural origin-in much the same sense that most Europeans think of theme
i menu;
`\ »t _)`~
V ,A us selves as the natural inheritor; of GII€€k and Roman civilization.
\
/
G U A T E M A L A HIGHLANDS
up ,ii the eastern third of Mesoamerica (Fig. 1). Maya
17
g
/
Cop . (
lands, both ancient and modern, occupy the Yucatan Peninsula, whose topography
varies from volcanic mountains, called the Highlands, in the south, to a porous lime~
0
9
Tang
.
,Q>
:>
H( stone shelf, called the Lowlands, in the central and northern regions. The Lowlands
.
E Baul s extend from Copan, Honduras, in the south to northern Yucatan. The east»west axis
r \\
includes Belize, most of modern Guatemala, and the Mexican state of Tabasco, where
/ ,QQ C us Comalcalco, the westernmost Classic-period 'Maya center is located. Few sites of the
r
J o I a Classic period are located at any significant altitude. Among the highest are Caracol,
r
\
Belize; Chinkultik, Chiapas; and Copan, Honduras, all of which are under 3,000 feet.
FIGURE I The Puuc Hills, in the states of Campeche and Yucatan, the Maya Mountains of Belize
and the Chiapas Mountains (as opposed to the Sierra Madre of Chiapas) are the on winter and summer seasons of the northern latitudes. February through May (when
topographic relief completely encompassed by the Classic Maya realm. Geologically think of springtime and renewal) is the dry season, the hottest and most uncomfortable
most of the region has an undulating karst foundation, making limestone and flint the time of the year. The newly cut fields must be burned during this time so that they will
most readily available stone. Fine kaolin clays also abound, particularly along sources be ready for the coming of the rains in late May or early june. Thus, not only is the dry
water season hot but even today, the smoke from burning fields makes it a time of dingy
The limestone underl the Lowlands creates a distinct topography and spe gritty skies, with no rains to wash them clean. With the coming of the rains, the earth
cal conditions. In the southern Lowlands, where rainfall can be as high as 160 inches and the forest are renewed in a contrast almost as dramatic as the rebirth of spring in
year, water drains toward the Gulf and the Caribbean in great river systems. As the the north. The smell of dead animals is washed away from fields and forests; the air is
yearly rainfall diminishes toward the north, surface water disappears. Water is found cleansed and cooled; the leaves of plants swell visibly with the water of life. The thun
only where the stone formations above underground rivers collapse to form water holes derstorms of summer are followed by a short, twos to three-week dry period in August
called cenotes. or artificial water cisterns. called cfmltuns. that were built by the ancient and then by the winter rains, the gentle, soaking rains that come with the storms called
Maya to collect rainwater. River systems were vital to Lowland civilization as the trans norres. The rhythms of Maya life built the changes from the dry to the wet
port system that moved people and materials. Of the rivers that drain the southern season. as success or failure in farming and life itself depends on the timely arrival of
Lowlands, the largest are the Usumacinta, with its tributaries the Lacantun, the rains
Chixoy and the SuasiOn; the Grijalva River drains the Chiapas Highlands. In the east The principal cultigen was maize, but the Maya grew squash, beans, chili
en regions the Rio Hondo, the New River, the Belize River and the Sarstoon empty per, amaranth manioc and cacao. One of the main methods of farming involved
into the Bay of Chetumal and the Caribbean. In the south, the Motagua, which clearing the forest and burning the debris to create fields, called mil
through the Guatemalan Highlands and the Chamelecon, in the Honduran Highlands lanted just before the rainy season began. Such slash»and»burn agriculture is steffi
both drain into the Caribbean sent, since any single field cannot be planted for more than two or three years before it
The southern Lowlands are covered b a rain forest whose average height exhausted. and from very early times, the Maya developed intensive farming meth
around 150 feet: it is broken by savannas and swamps, or bajos. The drier forest of the ods. Land on slopes or near gullies often terraced, but raised»field farming, the most
northern Lowlands characteristically has smaller, often thorny, trees. The Highlands widespread and effective method was practiced along slow moving rivers and
defined as lands above 1,000 feet (305 meters), are covered by pine forests. The High swampy areas. Canals were cut between fields and their bottom matter placed
lands are cooler and drier than the hot and humid Lowlands. which are, for the most prepared fields to enrich the soil. Periodically. when the canals dredged, the bot
part, only slightly above sea level. Certain resources obsidian, jade and other pre tom detritus was again used to fertilize the fields. The attributes associated with this
sous materials, such as cinnabar and specular hematite-could only be obtained from type of farming-the chest-deep water, the water-lilies that grew in the canals, the fish
the volcanic Highlands, and a lively trade in these minerals developed. Maya civilizer that lived in them, the birds that ate both plant and fish and the caiman that ate
son in ancient, colonial and modern times has always contrasted the societies of the everything came to symbolize abundance and the bounty of the earth. 3 Added to the
Lowlands to those of the Highlands. This contrast is less apparent today because the yields from milpa and raised-field production domestic gardens and husbandry of
Spanish depopulated the central Lowlands in the seventeenth and hteenth centuries the forest. The fruit imagery incorporated into Maya art, as on the sides of Pacal
their efforts to bring what they perceived as savages under civil and religious control sarchophagus at Palenque, indicates that they either raised or harvested from the forest
Only in the last decades has this process begun to reverse itself. as Tzotzil-. Tzeltal-. and quantities of avocados, Chico zapote fruit guanavana, nance, cacao and possibly
Chol»speaking groups have begun establishing communities in the Lowlands of ramon nut or breadfruit. Other important crops included cotton, used for light cloth
Chiapas; Kekchi-speaking groups have established similar communities in the Low and sisal, used for heavy cloth and
lands of Belize and Guatemala Maya history is divided into three great phases, each with several subdivisions
The tropical forests rich in animal life, of which the most dangerous spe (Fig. Z). The Preclassic period, during which civilization emerged in many parts of
cies to man were the jaguar the largest spotted cat in the world; the caiman. an Ameri Mesoamerica, begins at 1500 B.c. and continues until A.D. 200. Its subdivisions are the
can crocodile with the same appetite as its Qld World cousins the bull shark;2 Early Preclassic (2000-900 B.c.), the Middle Preclassic (900_300 B.c.) and the Late
variety of poisonous snakes, including the rattlesnake, the fer-de-lance, the bushmaster Preclassic (300 B.c.-A.D. 200), the period during which Maya civilization arose
and the coral. Food animals included deer, turkeys, peccaries, tapirs, rabbits and several Classic period (A. D. 200-900), considered to he the golden age of Maya civilization, is
kinds of large rodents, such as pace and agouti. The upper canopy of the forest divided into two subdivisions, the Early Classic (A.D. 200-600) and the Late Classic
inhabited by spider monkeys, loud»voiced howler monkeys and a variety of brilliant (A. D. 600-900). The society of the Classic period collapsed around A. D. 900. which led
colored birds, including parrots macaws. rnotmots and. in the elevations between the to the final phase of Precolumbian Maya history-the Postclassic, dated from A.D. 900
Lowlands and the Highlands, the famous quetzal. Other animals consistently repre to the Conquest of the Maya region by the Spanish in 1541
sented in Maya art include foxes, coatimundis, armadillos, water birds, such as the For about 150 years, ever since john Lloyd Stephens and Frederick Catherwood
heron and cormorant, owls, harpy eagles and hummingbirds made their famous explorations of the Maya realm and brought back romantic drawings
In the tropics, the yearly seasons are very different from the strongly contrasting of abandoned ruins shrouded by damp rain forests. the Western world has been as
'U E E
m u-l
2:
q.)
go E .E
I-. cO
E cu
>D U
UP
9.) U 4: ET C O _c C
'D E
U 3 :> ,o"- 4: U . c
o .E u
3
'O
O G
z: 3
-o := -* 'u
E
c 8:
N 8cu E n o
&".=4
:u
w U
.9 E
iv'
4-1
8
8
o uG.) 8" 3 :8"
m
cos .E §
50 QJ Ur:
*5. *.
4.)
(vs
e""
1.u~
t o
3
E
>
u
pa
*
u
L- >~
'vi
N
UD 8 4-r m %E up: 4-J
co
c: .TC
8
8
"` L
O-
*U
.-.
D
> CU
5 8
6 O
.::
U)
g.,
7a-v'3
A-
8 as cu
E i n
Ln no
.-C1 . E :Za U
c:
>
'U
8 8
9.°.E 8
8°
'U :
: .Ad
'U 0 0 8
:1
Q. up
CU _c
C
cu .
C
U u °5
'U t:
8°-E 6
O °°.: .a
anCD Q P : O co
:
8 ._1:
.S
N .3U(n
u 4-i
L- in
cu
'O > Q)
CL Lu
C 9 :=
m I-* UP 8-1
E _ =u
. u c 88 c
Q) 'U 8 in .2 "6 CU QJ
8 C
1-4
>~ 'kg 'U > cu ,m E
.Q QJ Q) .o E 2
'U
G)
"0
cu O E .CI cu E U :vs
in*
m _c L)
LJ Q) Q) E co :>~
U]
Ln
g : c
U
cus
cu DD .Co
a-»
.9 <c E un UP (IJ
s- C O
-1 C cu
c->
u 3 <: e OJ
G..
in .E (n
L.. 3 E 4
in 5 -x 53 ma
a.a
un 'U U
1.-
u
<u an
cos
L_.
so
G)
:
cos 4.-2
in (u n.. E 'r: -0
GJ C
E/J
QJ ii' __m
'U 3
an
.ZZ
in
is U 9
G
Et
. D
Q)
4-1 2 832
go nu c
s.. cut .-be
CO
"8co
so
G.
U)
D
_Q
5 as
unu
VJ E
O 9 w
-I
cu
13 .Ta
:1
(D
9
9 u E s:
U 8 E
in
cu 8
8 Q)
o.
*Q
4)
\-,
Q)
3
8
C
O
5~
.*: 8
Q.
9- U i<u
.§"
O..
GJ 9:> C
8
cus
O
r:
'-4-¢
r: U 'U 'U G U .L U) on 3 U CU
C
o C O 4) 4 c >~ cu c \-I
cu
CU (D 4) cu c=.,: re as 3 O _(I 4_4 Ogo'To
J-I 3 ¢.»
. c
4-1
|-
E .: E ><
_o
M
s- E _Q £3 4_4
a.. :s
pa
E
I: 0_ as & .\_»
UP
O
'8 o _up GJ cu 8 o °* ZN CO VJ O cu *' on 1-1
U<Z
.
.J- 8c Cr.)
O
<4
.__m EDD
E'
= ._*8
L) 8
._.
3 ..I
(u
_Q E
V)
O 3 GJ
C U
GJ
Us
8 on.C
.::
Q' 4.4 u.c8
CU
3
=-:
pa Cuba c .E
N O
3 r-
°
in
u ._I
0.EC 4,
o)
~.J c VJ
(2 ._
c 8 .G
U U 2
'U _go-:E O DDIU 'O c
-5 4-1
Ur:
4) "5 'U c gnu :: m
O
C m
L4
pa IS .L3 o. 8`
9UO no 8as,
a-
cu 5-1
cu x: r:
8 0)
3
c U°-'8O
2.§..3
CO
E ._1
\- co Q.
: o : m m
.L c
"3
'E
u.35(no
.-. 1-1 'U
E E
O m
E
>»
EO
0.2
E-* o
-Q
4-1 Cerros abandoned 9.) w
oz: .JI U
cu 4.4
c Abaj Takalik monuments U
c E
O 4-1 co: m
O cu >< O L-
OJ
E El Baul monument w cu m
GJ U
O _c >~
'U Kaminaljuyu monuments .g U
c
m
4 -1
U E
m 'O
::J
UU
N
cu
:: Cerros Structure 5C-Znd built > re 3
:J \C
CL
O in O
>~ :O U)
(I) Lamanai building constructed N GJ u l- C 'U
Q) 4-
O
>
GJ
L 4-1
w O f:
m
.C
.. Tikal and Uaxactun buildings 'U
U)
GJ
3-1 'U
E
GJ EU
2
4- Cl U QD
:s
O _.H
D.
O as constructed 'i41' C
c
N
uf)
U
m c. ,1-1
c
E 'Eta E
TO :: Japan monuments U cu <u U
4.
: 4. U-1
E.9 El Tigre and Danta built at El
3O
VJ u-»
3 O
»-I UU 2
E88 >
8
3
>~
Mirador
in
cu
4)
5
3
L.. c
cu _D E-J
T
1
EU I-IJ
CU
-I
cu
U) OO U
4'
EARLY ARCHAIC
LATE PFIECLASSIC MIDDLE PRECLASSIC
PRECLASSIC
IL
I I l I I I
o O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
v- o
1-
O O o O O O
O
O O O O O
co <YJ <r LO co l\ oo on Cal
v-
m
1-
o
Cal
PROLOGUE 13
THE MAYA IN WORLD HISTORY
The chronologies for Europe and Asia are based'on Feople and Places of the Past, general editor, George Stuart (Washington, D.C.: National Geographic Society, 1983).
E
g E "0 c 'é
U m On
c 3 as
fl 4 8
1-4
GJ
II)
E .::
2
CL
cu ea
VJ
as
33 4-1
Lf:
>-
4-1 4.) 'U in
cu .G
m
u 8 4)
>.
L_ .E 'C
nu
4) _up . E
x:
cu .-G
8
cu
.5
8 cu i>~s on
2 .a 2 ' U
>6
_c .-G o .
_c O 4 as .c E .E G
.9 Q r: .3 U »
cos
8 '0
»-I
U U _c
: u
pa
I
Q)
3 O
> 4: va CO 'a
-o o LD
O
E3 ..m U) O E U 4-1
in 5 U U
be
C :E E U 'U 8 Q) E B 3 Vu ...
3
3
E 'U .2
.9
U)
*-
>~ :o O
._ GJ
.c E
IU
in
:s
O
U 3
.8
c 13
a- o
1-4
4 3
-C-8
3:
s-
4>~
by, D' *un Ln .':.' >~ u
4) s T?- va
<
3 o
C .2
D-
a Q.)
_Q
loc
N
>
o
4-1
w
cu c: a~ 885 \-1
is
>
U
8
E
I-LJ
.M
o c:
>-
8,,
04
O
>~ U
- 8'-4'
ews
GD
_-. a Q
LQ
c
us
1\4
85% 8
5-0
*-' co
M cu
O Qom o
° ° : : . E
u
(u
O
..o
,S co
'U 0-6 8
O
u
1-1
._
A-
0 c
Q
no
E >~
-u D 84"
2.--o
cos cu
..»
.E O._¢ 2cu E
. 8;E c: 83 a 8%
cc?
fig; 8 .: (t
o-5.5 Q.
2 E02 .-G
>4 u..Uu)
o
of :
ma
cu
U Ez Et GI
»-<-~l-' cc: U) >4 CD
:<
o.
on
cos
(u
44
£1 cu -4
U
G
'U
8°
U cu cu |-
C 4-1 5-4 4)
C O U] 4-1
>, 'U
co:
cu L' E
U 8 2
un :1: '-..4.g Q__ U]
q.)
O 8 OB QJ E
..- G c
GD .E c CU*o
8 o 8cu _ : L u
m .8 g o;
D-
cu on LL!
O C UP
:s.- .--E\-I 'u 'is
U
| .
I on 5VJ 4)
up
C
a-J C O
==§ . a '4- 8 CU
ET
. 3
Q)
CI
-° 8
2 TO
c LL! .Q u
O
m 4-»
' U 4-4
s.. -_go E
>U :> E E
V)
C
m U) E 44
LD
. c
4 8
GJ
U
"GJ < °-* s: x: Q O
.D->
3 * c c .. Cr: .=° c "U 9
G) _ U ( J M
3
4
an
D.
o
:s- o
O m
0_c
Q
V)
cu
'U
C
8 8
=' c
CO
8 CI
-I :Eos
o' .uE 8
'U E.
8 GJ
3
EE
3
1
u :> m 8-1
5.0 'U
m 4
\J 1 , 8 9 38 GJ > 4-J
44- .-.Ed E
1
w '-»-
8 ~ > 4>
1-4
u 8
LU --1 O 8°88 E C
..:
G
8 C
cos E L,
"u
|-
U
CO u.: G O
8_9
28°
339 E I-I
v=8 as
in
ccu
.-|
_6
-I 4 , 0G
- on o O m in is 4: 4)
(u CID
e 5
>~
X-1
G 8.5
>-8D 8U :
_ ,
DD
in.
E E .E up
E QJ .s U
3.2 E
IU
E
33.9
.c an
8 CL
"9 o
o .E :E o _G 8 O
GJ
O
>com .c O m 'S
I E M Lu Z U > -355 Lu D- QUO Ni U 8 co Lu
3 gO .-. 8 .3.`
'a
'U S
8
U
un
\-1
s- C
\
'U 8
'a C UP
8
va
ETS
$4 'U
s-»
cu
>» u LL] u.4
'8»-
4-1
a; : E 'Ugh C1
U
m
Q. .8 on G 4
JJ
r:
4-»
c' ..¢: 8 -o GJ cu c:
.:
o U cu
:JS .Q et \-I o aJ U VJ
m Q)
..-
(D
u as UU G
0
.M
N
E GD
><:u a-r u :0 (up C Q.) <30i: cu zUr: c:
N
U
' U 4-J O
-o E 90
Ll ...C
U
as
go Q. :IN LE
D.
:cs
up D C
88 .o
GJ ca
Tm
I
o :E U 5
E
3U E
Q.
*'8 U 8" 5" >~ O
(n "9U
_cz .9 E m
H
cu U
3
cu
.8
EU
O
O U
U
._.
cos
LD
' U
1-1 8
a
TS G
O
:.
*-|
Q1J
U u .c. N
is
un GJ
w
38° 8 cu'o0
I-»' 3 N up a-J up I-I - 4.4 o
[-* E
'D
w
:4: - G
in ~g
nu O as
.:
cu E) "~".,
Q..- 4) CU
up Q-. nu _Q U
U 'd a.a *is
O
m in
.2 We CU
:
UP u U
__Zu9-48
>-* E kg 8 [I u
8-a 21
nu O
2
>, o gn E Do:
E _t. "5'58"=l°°*
co. cu CU
c8g_
co
41
N
°..\¢
U
u
"mes
u on c Iu-..C'
-: (n 53
_o
>eu°JUoan E». '+- a
UD
on UP
0 L* OJ
">(2*°° E
4_4
a
co
E : 'EE co.. U O
58 m
3-89 -Q
Q)
4;
>
E ° e UP
t o u E 9- 'U
>~.
CU
2
8
"'a3=3
M u p
1-4
Eo
u
8 ><
Q. >°5
:Q- ¢§ ¢§ l-d
_u_ lU) 21; *
ask-
§O'0auE
* (u
Q) mu 8 GJ
:Q go .MV)
:1 >~>~
'U U
G 4-1
38
>*
2
8
8
.g
:_-
O
U ._. _go -~<- -a ,.¢ C c~~J 8 /"'
~ ¢8 9?
5 1
cu
>--8n5
U)
L' cu
Q)
'l>* we cu U w o.. U
E 1 1N- 6 \ £3
E
2
U ...
c :Q
cal _zz
'U O °* as
w 9 :I4) E 3) >~ 'JS 8 I: 4-JN U
s-
5-u u p 8 O44'8E
88-x='°"° U. U 3m\-m%U~
a-. -4 \4 E .- U
... au cu
E "cs <4><QUO in Fu 8 >-.- II* C UP in E3
H
l- .-c 5_4
.C
as
0 .§§ ® $ \
§ LE=~E
U an
"as 2 .E
4.1
1N
:H
.-4
5 '5 -I-e_ ~ 5-4
m : .-.
ClD
G DD
3 4
in
1-4
m
s-
_u-=4.30.(n\0a m¢Ucno.c3Z
cos cu cu GJ CU cu
m _1 I-Ll Q 8 8 a.. 0.4¢ -a cu
Le. Lx..
E
re
CO 4-4
>~ on
>~
<0 in :m 'U
o u Sas
E 2
in D. .. UC
s o' C
as
U
GJ
.: m O a
u ._ g--o cos
4- _cg U Bas
pa
cu
:s
-E
4-
O
U
E GJ CU 0..-,'8 ¢.»
r:
9* u .C
£8
CU O
3
>- M E a, (u
O
4-»
cu 40)-4 *8
Q) 8
UP f:
U'
:
_U
E- < 24 UD
w-QQ I-*
"a ~'e§&'
==~ Q u
ca
»-.92
4-v \O .G
CD 8 'U 1-4 Ur:
8
cu .°:
>-
0 53
as
'U *8 E on. cu CD
_==
'
. a v-4 of _G
co
».»J
I \4-1
w D.. U r*~. 2 .on I»' f`~l
O 'U
v-4 cu 4-1
1-~ _8 as K.J:
a
E
c E E
38
O
To
L_ 4_4 :_- Q- cu
u
.M
M (U
E
U 1-1
*O .. 2
5O 3
cu
w
:J
LD
Q) O <1
Q)
cos
»-4 ld Q.[-'cum (1)
3'N 4
G.) 3 8_4 an
L-
: 3 U
G
8-4J
*-' cu
E c--'- (u
OF -Uo U) U -1 in d)
O
:J U
C
O
*_J
in
EU
D..
E
><
U
CO
cu
-u
4.a
m
' g x>-I-
o é U
C).
9-~
264
a '"
U
SI
Q. as
84
(W
<Q TS .-54
qJ
E 30 an GJ ....
'D cu -
r: TO 3
.0
:nu
U _1
Q)
P U _1
cos
=8o et 4)
O
L..
G U QUO[-. ._....D M _I I- ::
U .'
co
POST CLASSIC ' PROTO
'D
O LATE CLASSIC EARLY CLASSIC
L_
(n
CLASSIC
D_
E n n
3 O O O o O O O O O O O O O O o
"5
o
qv)
LO
1-
LoO
v-
O
<r
1-
O
(yj
|
O
N
v-
O
1_
1
o
O
v-
O
m O
oo
O
|\
O
co
o
Lr) O
<r O
rr)
O
C\J
I
FIGURE 2
12 T H E B L OODOF K IN GS
cinated by the beautiful and mysterious art of the ancient Maya. Detached from the
the color of blood or in blood symbols. In the Maya view, none of these behaviors was
context that once gave them meaning, these works were regarded as exotic objects. The
bizarre or exotic but necessary to sustain the world. To speak of the Maya and their
hundreds of thousands of visitors to the ruins of Maya cities have gazed at the Mayas' rulers is, therefore, to speak of The Blood of Kings.
descendants in detached curiosity and have bought their crafts to adorn their homes.
The title and point of view put forth in this study are revolutionary. The here-
The Classic Maya are now emerging from a dimly perceived archaeological tofore popular view of the Classic Maya has never taken into account such preoccupa-
prehistory to become a people with a written history. From 50 B.c. until A.D. 900, the
tions as blood and bloodlines, nor has it emphasized the individual rulers prominent in
Maya recorded the histories of their kings and captains on stone monuments in a script
Maya history. As this new understanding of the Maya has emerged over the past
that until 1960 remained mute and unread. During the last twenty-five years, however,
twenty-five years, many people have been repulsed by convincing evidence of human
advances by epigraphers and scholars have pierced the mystery of that writing system,
sacrifice and blood offerings and have drawn away from such a tangible or realistic view
thereby providing us a window into a world that heretofore was shrouded by the mists of
of the Maya. In Mesoamerican studies, a propensity for gore had always been attributed
prehistory. Rather than anonymous priests and unnamed gods, the works depict men
to the Aztecs. In contrast, the Maya were always assumed to be a superior race, thor-
and women of power and renown in their own time. From stone monuments that re-
oughly removed in time, space and culture from such behavior. In the new view pre-
count their deeds and the source of their power, we reclaim not just the faces of these sented here, however, the Maya have fallen from their pedestal; in doing so, they
kings, but more important, a detailed record of their lives, their names, their ancestry become a part of the community of man, the builders of a civilization that included
and their view of the world around them. The written history of the Americas began in both the darkest and the most brilliant possibilities of human behavior.
50 B.c., and from that moment on, the records resound with the names and lives of The methodology of this study derives from the union of hieroglyphic
individuals: Pacal of Palenque, Bird ]agar of Yaxchilan, Yax-Pac of Copan, among decipherment and the interpretation of pictorial imagery, which together allow us to
many others. Now these kings and the world they constructed can take their place on
discover patterns inherent in Maya art. Writing loses meaning unless it follows struc-
the stage of world history beside such counterparts in the Old World as Rameses II,
tural rules governing word use and grammar. These patterns are so prevalent in Maya
Assurnasirpal and Alexander the Great. writing that twenty-five years ago, Tatiana Proskouriakoff was able to deduce the mean»
This study is called The Blood of Kings for very specific reasons. The word king is ing of glyphs without determining the Maya words they represented.5 Maya imagery,
used instead of the Maya words for their rulers, mah k'ina ("great sun lord") or aha like their writing, has inherent patterns that can be "read" like glyphs. These patterns
("lord"), because the Maya words have no meaning to English speakers and because the are the primary key to understanding Classic Maya art.
original English meaning of king is appropriate to the way these rulers lived. King is an The dates the Maya recorded on many of their monuments make up one of the
Old English title borne by leaders of Anglo»Saxon tribes; it shares its root with the primary patterns that have been used to construct a history of Maya art. The assump-
words kin and kinship, and it originally referred to rulers of petty states, not unlike those tion that the dates are generally contemporary with their images has been confirmed by
that existed among the Classic Maya.4 There was no Maya emperor, no single Maya archaeological data. For some time, early works have been distinguished from late
king who gained ascendancy over all others. Pacal of Palenque ruled at the same time as
works, even when their meaning remained obscure, and undated works could be as-
Smoke jaguar of Copan; one hundred years later, Kuk of Palenque and Yax-Pac of cribed to an appropriate period of manufacture, because of their stylistic similarity to
Copan reigned simultaneously. We use the word king here in the sense that Arthur, not dated monuments. When combined with knowledge of the origin and intent of works
Henry Tudor, was king.
of art, chronological information could be used to determine the continuities and
The Blood of the title refers directly to several aspects of Maya life and to Maya changes in style that depended on time and place.
beliefs about their world and their kings. Blood was the mortar of ancient Maya ritual The texts embedded in pictorial scenes or carved on the sides and backs of
life. The Maya let blood on every important occasion in the life of the individual and in
r
Maya stelae are our primary sources in working out the meaning of Maya art. Fun
the life of the community. It was the substance offered by kings and other nobility to damentally, the imagery of Maya art portrays the text in explicit terms. A text can be
seal ceremonial events. Even more important, the purpose of art was to document the I
ber 15 and 23, 4772, and there is evidence that they perceived this creation to have a
i
folding-screen books made from the bark of the fig tree. Many of these books were minimum cycle of slightly under 142 nonillion years." A more detailed explanation of
placed in tombs but did not survive the destructive humidity of the tropics. Many other the calendar, the writing system and the process of glyphic decipherment appears at the
I
ers were deliberately destroyed by the Spanish as the work of the devil."The four Maya conclusion of this book.
books known today-the Dresden Codex, the Madrid Codex, the Paris Codex and the
This study is organized into discussions on eight themes, or patterns, of Maya
Grolier Codex7-record astronomical and calendric information and were very prob- art; they have been chosen because they recur in Maya art time and again. !°Through
ably used to time events in the ritual life of the Maya. All four date from the Postclassic them we can understand the preoccupations of Classic fperiod Maya life. The first
period, but there is no doubt that there were many such codices used in the Classic theme, "The Royal Person," is an explanation of the royal costuming and ritual objects
period as well, not only to keep track of ritual but to record fully detailed historical depicted throughout Maya art.
information-the genealogies of kings and noble lineages, as well as tribute and trade "Kingship and the Rites of Accession," treats the single most important ritual
exchanges. of a king's life, his installation into office, the point at which he inherits the position of
The hieroglyphic writing of the Maya was a fully functional writing system head of his lineage and leader of his city. The religious explanation that upheld the
capable of recording every nuance of the spoken language. It is composed of a combina- institution of kingship asserted that Maya rulers were necessary for the continuance of
tion of different signs, some representing the value of whole words, others recording the the universe itself.
sound of a single syllable (a consonant plus vowel). Information could be conveyed in The kings who ruled the major sites were served at home and Li subsidiary sites
inscriptions alone, most often, however, a text recording when, what and who is com» by nobles, or cabals, who acted as administrators and governors. The activities of these
bined with pictorial information that shows action. Text was often not limited to the nobles-the delivery of tribute, interaction with foreigners, marriage alliances, formal
event pictured but linked the scene depicted to previous events as well. The inscriptions rituals of dress and courtly councils-are all shown in Maya art and, here, under the
are in many ways the most important cultural remains of the Maya, since their theme "Courtly Life. '
decipherment has produced the names of their kings and precise details of their history. Personal bloodletting, now recognized as a regular ritual of Maya life rather
The texts name the actors as priests, gods, kings or military officers; without them, we than an occasional penance, is the subject of the theme "Bloodletting and the Vision
would not know that a scene depicts accession. why 1 bloodletting rite took place or Quest." Through bloodletting, the Maya elite demonstrated their legitimacy and com»
the nature of many of the other rituals. I
municated with ancestors who were understood to reappear as visions. These rituals
The events recorded in the inscriptions were set in a complex and precise tem» occurred under many circumstances, as part of the life events that include accession,
poral framework. The Maya believed that the world had been created and destroyed at marriage, birth and warfare. They occur with greatest regularity, however, at the com-
least three times, the last creation beginning on August 13, 3114 B.c.** Historical dates pletion of the twenty»year period, the katun.
in Maya inscriptions are given in one of two forms-the Long Count and Calendar In "Warfare and Captive Sacrifice," the imagery of battle that dominates cer-
Round dates. Long Count dates are precise counts of elapsed time based on a 360-day tain sites is discussed. Undoubtedly some Classic Maya cityfstates were more bellig-
year, called a tun, which was divided into 18 months of 20 days each, called a uinal. erent than others, but few places failed to record victory in war in some way. Even
Since the Maya numbering system is based on twenty rather than on ten, they counted during the Early Classic period, when texts were more laconic and multi figural com-
years in groups of twenty tuns, called a katun ("20-tun"), and twenty katuns, called a positions unusual, captives were shown bound under the feet of the ruler.
baktun ("400-tun"). A Long Count date, such as 9. 13.0.0.0, simply records that nine "The Ballgame" discusses an activity that was by no means a sport in modern
groups of 400 tuns and thirteen groups of 20 tuns have ended since the beginning of this terms but a ritual of kingship. Ballgame imagery_in which the Maya king is victorious
era, or 9x400 + 13x20 = 3,860 years of 360 days. at play-relates closely to that of warfare.
The final themes, "Death and the journey through Xihalba" and "Kingship
laying the seeds for later notions about the Maya and their "peaceful" behavior.
Perhaps no other work about the ancient Maya has been studied so intensely as
the four volumes that Stephens published between 1841 and 1843. The books were dismissed, the illustrations he made in an Egyptianizing style subtly promoted his ideas
among the great bestsellers of the nineteenth century, and these volumes remain some (Fig. 4). Moreover, his comments may also have promoted the notion of the peaceful
of the best books ever written on the Maya. The illustrations, engravings by Frederick Maya. When Count Waldeck looked at the stuccoed piers of the Temple of Inscriptions
Catherwood (Fig. 3), conveyed the romance of the subject, as well as fairly dependable at Palenque, he wondered if the tender-hearted ancient Palencanos could have ever
information about the ruins. Stephens noted the consistent unity of the hieroglyphic been cruel, or even rough, to one another, since he thought the adult figures on the
writing system throughout the region where he traveled, whether the writings were monuments were depicted carrying children. It is now known that what Waldeck as-
recorded on stone or in book form, and he argued that the monuments were historical sumed were children are, in fact, supernaturals, right down to their snaky bodies and
art. Most important for his own time, he firmly believed Maya culture to have been an serpent feet. is
indigenous civilization of the Americas, one that developed without fertilization from The still-intractable hieroglyphic writing system on the monuments further
Egypt, India or China, the sources popularly mentioned in his day. compounded the romantic ideas that Westerners had about Maya art. By the end of the
Over the course of the nineteenth century, many of Stephens's ideas were lost nineteenth century, many breakthroughs had been made in deciphering dates, but little
to scholars. By the end of the century, the notion of a peaceful Maya civilization had else; the remaining inscriptions seemed to be abstract, beautiful texts to be admired but
begun to grow because little progress had been made in determining the meaning of the perhaps never to be read. The dates were clear evidence of the arithmetical and calen-
l
carved monuments and inscriptions. Of the many Maya cities, little was known outside drical skills of the Maya, and this gave rise to the idea that they were philosophers of
of a handful of principal temples. The first Maya art to become widely known, for s time and numbers.
example, came from Palenque and Copan, largely by means of Catherwood's The correlation between the Christian and Maya calendars determined by ].T.
engravings. The placid, courtly images of monuments at these two sites were highly Goodman in 1905 has held to the present day. By the Christian calendar, the Classic
readable. They emphasized human forms and placed particular emphasis on faces, espec Maya were found to have erected their great Lowland monuments from the fourth to
cally when compared with the conventionalized human figures of Aztec art. Western the ninth centuries A.D. The fact that in Yucatan, most monuments were of later date
observers embraced the art of the Maya, whose culture seemed to be pure and gave rise to the theory that the Maya had two periods of florescence, the so-called Old
untarnished by the preoccupations of the Aztecs. Count Waldeck, a French explorer and New Empires. The Maya were considered the Creeks of the New World, and the
who lived for a time in the ruins of Palenque, expressed a sentiment in 1838 that con- Aztecs were seen as Romans-one pure, original and beautiful, the other slavish,
formed to the prevailing notions of the day. The Maya were, he assured his readers, a derivative and cold. By the end of the century, these notions had begun to be system-
people and culture derived from Asia, perhaps from India. Even when his writings were atized. Alfred P. Maudslay wrote:
Other evidence was thought to corroborate the view that the Maya had been
peaceful, too preoccupied with time and their calendar to wage war. The first Classic
Maya site to be explored in any detail (and it remained the only one for thirty years)
was Copan. At that time, the end of the nineteenth century, excavators from the Pea
body Museum found no walls such as would have been built for defense. The stelae and
reliefs did not show figures readily identifiable as warriors. Burials, when found. did not
suggest the mass burials one might expect from the carnage of warfare. For many years
the data gathered at Copan (and just as important, the data not gathered) helped shape
a view of the peaceful Classic Maya. Practices described by both the Maya and the
Spanish at the time of the Conquest continued to be discounted as Postclassic invert
sons, atypical of the Classic Maya and inspired by central Mexicans. That. of course
returned the source of barbaric practices to the precursors of the Aztecs and stimulated
the notion of a Greek-Roman dichotomy
Yet other ancient Maya ruins, which also came to light at the turn of the
fury, should have challenged some of these interpretations. Maudslay, for example
visited Yaxchilan in 1882: he was so struck by the beauty of the monuments that he
ordered several to be shipped to England, where they became the core of the British
Museum's collection of Precolumbian antiquities. Nearly twenty years after he first
the lintels, Maudslay published some of the Yaxchilan material without comment on
imagery. Nevertheless, the drawing that accompanied Lintel 17 is telling
scene-quite obviously one of self-sacrifice_the woman pulls rope through her
tongue, and the man directs a sharpened bone to his groin. In Maudslayls drawing
however, only the text and faces of the protagonists are shown. The rope was not shown
being drawn through the woman's mouth, and the scene no longer held any indication
of violence blood sacrifice (Fig. 5b). Apparently, either Maudslay Annie Hunter
his excellent draftsman, made an editorial decision
It now seems surprising that in the first few decades of the century, no one 'gnu
looked at the newly discovered Maya art of Yaxchilan and Piedras Negras noticed the
clear evidence for the Maya preoccupation with battle and blood offerings. At Piedras
Negras, nearly half the monuments show warriors, many of them with captives, and
some of the "niche" stelae single sacrificed victim is shown. At Yaxchilan. whole
lintel programs were dedicated to showing assaults on captives. Despite the ht of all
these images, however, the content of these monuments was not acknowledged. is In a
series of photographs of the monuments, published between 1896 and 1911 by the
Peabody Museum. it would appear that Teobert Maler made no judgments about the
FIGURE 5 interpretation of the Yaxchilan and Piedras Negras material; nevertheless, unless they
Contrasting studies of a detail
from Yaxchilan Lintel 17
were on the front of the monument, gyp were not included un his photographic
Late Classic period, ca. A.D. 775-770 documentation (Fig. 6). Not only were they not available for study, to Maler they
a. Modern drawing appeared not to exist, for he did not even include them systematically among his
b. Nineteenth century drawing b
Annie Hunter for Alfred R Maudslay
unpublished materials. A few years later, Herbert Spinden correctly recognized ruler
portraits and the violent content of the monuments photographed by Maler at Piedras
Negras and Yaxchilan, but his obsession with the correlation of the Maya and Christian
sign of the Carnegie Institution of Washington dominated Maya studies in the United
the data gathered at Copan (and just as important, the data riot gathered) helped shape States. It directed, published and plotted the design of most of the Maya archaeology
a view of the peaceful Classic Maya. Practices described by both the Maya and the
i
carried out by Americans during those years, and it influenced all other work on the
Spanish at the time of the Conquest continued to be discounted as Postclassic invert» Maya done elsewhere. The moving force behind the Carnegie Institution was Sylvanus
sons, atypical of the Classic Maya and inspired by central Mexicans. That, of course, G. Morley. Morley set up projects at Uaxactun, Guatemala and Chic fen Itza in the
returned the source of barbaric practices to the precursors of the Aztecs and stimulated Yucatan w test theories about the Maya, and he embarked on a campaign of explore
the notion of a Greek»Roman dichotomy. son to document all Maya ruins and inscriptions, a project that eventually led to the
Yet other ancient Maya ruins, which also came to light at the turn of the cen- discovery of many new sites and sculptures." For this work, the most important consid-
tury, should have challenged some of these interpretations. Maudslay, for example, eration is the point of view the Carnegie Institution publications espoused.
visited Yaxchilan in 1882; he was so struck by the beauty of the monuments that he l
One of the by»products of archaeology in the Maya region was familiarity with
ordered several to be shipped to England, where they became the core of the British modern Maya life. For those who worked at Chic fen Itza, the cycle of modern Yucatec
Museum's collection of Precolumbian antiquities. Nearly twenty years after he first saw life was compelling, and many researchers fell under its spell. Morley watched the
the lintels, Maudslay published some of the Yaxchilan material without comment on pattern of slash-and-burn agriculture and applied it to the past, thus making the Maya
the imagery. Nevertheless, the drawing that accompanied Lintel 17 is telling; in the an anomaly: a high civilization based on primitive agricultural methods. This conclu-
scene-quite obviously one of self-sacrifice-the woman pulls a rope through her sion, however, limited conjecture of the total population of the Classic Maya to one
tongue, and the man directs a sharpened bone to his groin. In Maudslay's drawing, supportable by such techniques. To Thompson, the vacant market towns of highland
however, only the text and faces of the protagonists are shown. The rope was not shown Guatemala revealed that ancient ones were little more than ceremonial centers.22 His
being drawn through the woman's mouth, and the scene no longer held any indication view (and perhaps his ability to argue it) was so overpowering that despite the fact that
of violence or blood sacrifice (Fig. 5b)- Apparently, either Maudslay or Annie Hunter, settlement studies carried out at Uaxactun argued for a population of 50,000 or so,
his excellent draftsman, made an editorial decision. Tatiana Proskouriakoffls reconstruction drawings of Uaxactun (made for the Carnegie
It now seems surprising that in the first few decades of the century, no one who Institution) show vacant ceremonial centers isolated Li the jungle, as if there had been
looked at the newly discovered Maya art of Yaxchilan and Piedras Negras noticed the no resident population. No other drawings of Maya architecture have been as accurate
clear evidence for the Maya preoccupation with battle and blood offerings. At Piedras as Proskouriakoffls, but they conveyed a powerful point of view. Her drawings remain
Negras, nearly half the monuments show warriors, many of them with captives, and on the most influential reconstructions of Maya architecture and may never be superseded
some of the "niche" stelae, a single sacrificed victim is shown. At Yaxchilan, whole in quality, yet they will continue to promote the notion that Maya cities were vacant FIGURE 6
lintel programs were dedicated to showing assaults on captives. Despite the weight of all (Fig. 7).23 Stela 35, Piedras Negros, Guatemala
Late Classic period, ca. A.D. 662
these images, however, the content of these monuments was not acknowledged. is In a Early in his career (and notably before his long association with Thompson), Photo by Teobert Maler
series of photographs of the monuments, published between 1896 and 1911 by the Morley adopted the view of the Maya put forth by Stephens: that mundane, historical Courtesy of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and
Peabody Museum, it would appear that Teobert Maler made no judgments about the information was borne by Maya inscriptions. Nevertheless, by the time he amassed his Ethnology, Harvard University
interpretation of the Yaxchilan and Piedras Negras material; nevertheless, unless they great five-volurne corpus, Inscriptions of Peten, he had apparently abandoned any hope
were on the front of the monument, glyphs were not included in his photographic of reconstructing the historical content. Morley's treatment of inscriptions beyond
documentation (Fig. 6). Not only were they not available for study, to Maler they calendrical data was simple: he did not draw them.24 The assumption, one might say,
appeared not to exist, for he did not even include them systematically among his was bold-if he could not decipher them, then no one could. Thompson, who es-
unpublished materials. A few years later, Herbert Spinden correctly recognized ruler poused this negative viewpoint more energetically, may have been responsible for
I
portraits and the violent content of the monuments photographed by Maler at Piedras persuading his colleague to follow his lead. Indeed, elaborate hypotheses were invented
Negras and Yaxchilan, but his obsession with the correlation of the Maya and Christian to explain the content of Maya writing:
5
the historical content of Maya glyphs and art. Although it focused on the inscriptions
at Piedras Negras, her work showed beyond a doubt that similar historical information
was found at all sites. In two essays on Yaxchilan, she showed the rulers Shield jaguar
and Bird jaguar to be military leaders who memorialized themselves in image and text as
1 great warriors. Thus, by the early 1960s in just four seminal articles, the Maya had
become regionally oriented, dynastic and warlike. Their images were no longer abstract
representations of calendar priests but glorifications of individual kings.
Following the dissolution of the Carnegie Institution in 1955, many Maya as
chaeologists chose to investigate technical and theoretical problems. Leading a world-
wide trend in archaeological studies, Mayanists turned away from the study of site
centers and began to concentrate on the archaeology of mundane life. The archaeolo-
gist's tools were enriched by new technical capabilities, such as radiocarbon dating,
pollen studies and aerial photography. Sensitive to criticism that Mayanist studies had
become "intellectual stamp collecting,"27 they concentrated on "scientific" questions,
I
FIGURE 7 I
three of which have implications here: What was the basis of Maya agriculture? Where
View of Copan, Honduras did the Maya live? When did Classic Maya civilization emerge?
Drawing by Tatiana Proskouriakoff
Courtesy of the Peabody Museum of Archeology and
l
For most of the century, and because of observation of the modern Maya, the
Ethnology, Harvard University 1 notion of small populations supported by slash-and~burn agriculture had thrived-in
I
1
notable contrast to Aztec raised-field agriculture-by observation of the modern
Maya. In 1972, however, Dennis Puleston and Alfred Siemens used aerial photography
I am persuaded that inscriptions were longest around 9. 13.0.0.0 (A. D. 692) because the to document raised fields, probably of Classic-period date, in southern Campeche. Sud-
Maya scientists were then deep in argument on two problems' the length of the solar denly, after years of considering only the hypothetical possibility of greater agricultural
year and how best to record lunar data. A century later, after these matters had been
solved to the satisfaction of the priest-astronomers, the inscriptions on stele were
yields, Maya archaeologists understood intensive agriculture to have been the rule, not
much abbreviated." I the exception. This revelation admitted to denser, more urban environments. More»
I over, new studies had begun to indicate that ceremonial centers were surrounded by
The discovery in 1946 of the painted murals of Bonarnpak is a watershed of
significant populations during the Classic period. At the site of Dzibilchaltun in north-
Maya studies, for these paintings transformed our view of the Classic Maya. In no other
.I
ern Yucatan, for example, a population of 50,000 was projected for Classic times; a
work of Maya art do so many figures appear, and even to the uninitiated, they look like
similar size was subsequently calculated for Tikal.2** One can only hazard a guess at the
particular individuals, and the short columns of glyphs beside them are almost undoubt- i
total population of the Maya area during the Classic period, but many archaeologists
edly captions. In a pageant of rulership that covered the walls of three rooms in a small
consider two million to be a reasonable estimate. Although not large by preindustrial
temple, the murals showed a series of ceremonies, including the single greatest battle
standards-Teotihuacan in central Mexico is thought to have had a population of
painting of the ancient New World. Thompson, who wrote about these works for a
nearly 250,000 by A.D. 550-centers of 50,000 people were indeed cities, supporting
Carnegie Institution publication, forced them to conform to his own view of Maya
dense residential settlements, and the Maya may have had twenty cities of this size. The
society by calling the scene a minor raid of little historical significance. The pictures,
image of the peaceful, pastoral Maya and its corollary theories had lasted less than a
however, spoke for themselves; the idea of the peaceful Maya was on the point of
century, but at last these theories gave way before overwhelming evidence to the
becoming a vanishing myth."
The identity of the figures on Maya stelae was a subject both Morley and I contrary.
Finally, the earliest date of many of the cultural elements we call Classic-long
Thompson obscured, preferring not to mention it, although at various times they called accepted to be around A.D. 300-can be attributed to the Late Preclassic period, to as
them "gods" or "calendar priests." They were not, to Thompson or Morley, the men early as 150 B.c. The earliest dated Maya monument (Stela 29 at Tikal, dated to A.D.
and women who had ruled their respective sites. To have made them tangible would 292) has traditionally been used to mark the beginning of the Classic period and, by
have necessitated an explanation of their behavior. Instead, the image of a peaceful, extension, the beginning of Maya civilization. Yet evidence from excavations at El
theocratic and nondynastic Maya became a philosophical haven from the warlike, Mirador, Tikal, Uaxactun, Lamanai and Cerros makes it patently clear that, with the
secular twentieth century known to these writers. exception of stelae, all elements characterizing Maya civilization were thriving in the
Mesoamericanists only began to see the Maya in a different light when the Maya Lowlands in the first century B.c., and the huge buildings at El Mirador may have
been constructed a century earlier. Thus, in the truest sense of the word, "Classic" the Maya glyph for sun or day, were placed at the base of the lowest tiers of these
Maya civilization was in place by 100 B.c. The origins of Classic Maya civilization are pyramids. A long crocodilian snout at the top of these masks probably identifies the
i
now shown to conform chronologically to the rest of Mesoamerica, and are confirmed form as Venus. This configuration shows the prototype of the Morning Star pulling the
gQ
E
to be contemporary with developments in central Mexico and Oaxaca. sun in its journey across the sky. Like billboards, this cosmic imagery dotted the land-
The first great phase of Mesoamerican cultural history, the Preclassic, cor» 1
; scape across the Maya Lowlands at most sites in Late Preclassic times.
responds in general to the emergence of civilization in Mesoamerica. The Early I
exhibit Olmec influence are documented throughout the Chiapas and Guatemalan year A.D. 37.32 It is possible that the preoccupations of historical rulership were never L J
Highlands, especially on the Pacific side (although Olmec symbolism is, by cornpari» lost in the Highlands but were maintained continuously from Olmec times. Whatever
son, rare in Lowland archaeology). the impetus, by the Late Preclassic period, the stele format was an established method
The Middle Preclassic period (900-300 B.c.) is a time of change, especially in of illustrating historical records in the Highlands.
the Maya region. The great Olmec city of San Lorenzo was abandoned by 900 B.c. , and
La Venta arose as the prominent Gulf Coast site of the Olmecs. By 600 B.c., villages
By A. D. 200 at the latest, at Tikal and Uaxactun in the central Peten region, as
well as at other Maya sites there, including Rio Azul, these two critical aspects of Late
993,
_ 14
were being established throughout the Maya Lowlands and Highlands, many of them Preclassic art-architecture carrying mask assemblages and stele recording historical
specializing in trade or production." The growing complexity of public ritual is in evi- kingship-coalesced to forge the Early Classic. While this symbolic system had been
dence at Cuello, where a new platform was dedicated around 400 B.c. with the sacrifice manifested on building facades during Late Preclassic times, during the Early Classic ( '-` W
and dismemberment of over twenty victims. 30 Perhaps most important for the develop- period, Maya kings took the imagery from the architecture and began to wear it. The
ment of civilization, the Middle Preclassic period saw the beginning of intensive ag» most complete early records contributing to our incomplete understanding of this trans-
riculture in raised-field systems and the development of major water management pro- formation are stelae from Tikal dating to the third and fourth centuries; even by then,
/
grams at sites like Edzna." however, it is clear that the visual symbolism of kingship had been systematized and was I ,?JI#PlF
The Late Preclassic period (300 B.c.-A.D. 300) was a time of transformation shared by all Lowland Maya: the Maya had embarked on the civilization that would FIGURE 8
for the Maya; it resulted in what we see today as civilization. Both in the Highlands and thrive through the ninth century A.D. Stela 1, El Baul, Guatemala
the Lowlands, the Maya began building large population centers ruled by elite groups. The Classic period saw the great flowering of Maya art and architecture and Late Preclassic period, A.D. 37
In the Lowlands, long»resident populations replaced their villages with massive build- the widest dispersion of elite cultural manifestations, such as the stele cult, the iconog-
ings, some of the largest ever built in the Precolumbian Americas. In the south, archi- raphy of kingship and hieroglyphic writing. The two main phases of the Classic period,
tecture was less overwhelming in size, but it was accompanied by stelae depicting the Early Classic (A.D. 200-600) and Late Classic (A.D. 600-900), are separated by a fifty~
Long Count calendar, as well as images of rulers enacting important rituals. Most of the year gap, dubbed the "hiatus" by Morley, who noted the paucity of inscriptions datable
early sites in the southern area-Izapa, Abaj Takalik, El Baul, Chalchuapa_are on to A.D. 530-580. Ceramics, sculptural style and composition, architectural elements
the Pacific side of the Continental Divide. Only Kaminaljuyu was built in the region and the nature of imported goods all change at this boundary, although the differences
between the northern and southern drainage system. Early sites in the Lowlands are are neither so marked nor so dramatic as once supposed. Even so, inscriptions discos
found along the river drainages, although at least one, El Mirador, sits in swampland ered from the period are still limited, particularly at Tikal and Uaxactun, where the
between the Caribbean and Gulf drainage systems. During the Late Preclassic period, hiatus appears to have been the most profound, but at many other cities-Yaxchilan,
the template for Maya kingship and their world view was set for the next one thousand Palenque and Caracol-it appears to be a time of expression and growth. Since most
years of civilization. buildings constructed before the Late Classic period (and probably most other art as
At Cerros along the coast of Belize and at El Mirador in the Peten, a dramatic well) were overlaid by subsequent construction, the Early Classic forms are known only
change occurred that allows us to speculate on how Classic Maya civilization devel- at sites that have been extensively excavated.
oped. Throughout Mesoamerica in general and the Maya region in particular, popula- Most archaeological evidence for occupations of the first half of the Early Clas-
tions were growing rapidly. Long-distance trade expanded, concentrating wealth iii just sic period have been found in the central and northeastern Peten region. Around A.D.
a few hands-probably in one clan or lineage, who exercised increasing power. The 350, however, three occurrences of major importance to the cultural history of the
world in which the Maya of Cerros lived, for example, was no longer a i egalitarian Maya took place. Sites all over the area inhabited by the Maya, especially those at the
farming community. Around 50 B.c., all constructions at Cerros were razed, and new periphery, such as Copan, Palenque and Tonina, begin to develop their own dynastic
constructions-stepped pyramids dominated by huge stucco masks in a dramatic new histories, presumably as independent states. At about the same time, most of the sites
imagery-were built; in this imagery, the primary elements of Classic Maya iconogra- in the southern region (except Kaminaljuyu) lost vitality and thereafter did not particif
phy, the sun and Venus, appeared for the first time. Great jaguar masks marked by kin, pate in the elite manifestations of Maya culture. Finally, in both the Highlands and the
MODERN INVENTION OF TH
THE BLOOD OF KINGS
tered at Chic fen Itza and another at Mayapan, developed; they were controlled by
lineages, such aS the Itza, that the Yucatecs described as foreigners. 38 In the Highlands
'
1b/{»,y4ma I pa, 7 ,.,$44'»vu
so| vi
a. v >'Fm~»~ 6 , , , _ , of Guatemala, Cakchiquel and Quiche dynasties came to dominate the region, both
vu- ¢J.51'J
claiming that they were inheritors of the Toltec, the legendary people of the Terminal
.r¢ f"'*""""
no-VL/P" 40014 »ffnc¢»-.£»~acA4M¢»¢y» , kg Classic period, from whom most Postclassic peoples claim political descent. The High»
7 £'"
'L~~»»-' 5¢¢§» 6ffw %'1'~ ~°`
lands of Chiapas were dominated by the Tzotzil; the Candelaria and lower Usumacinta
rivers by the Acalan Chontal Maya.
p
¢¢1~»~°-""~'*'.
' L.l..;pa»~-- u
¢£¢£*{L,[.»»¢.1,¢§
The Spanish conquered Yucatan and established their capital at Mérida in
4yl 7ww% m
¢»~»~-'»»'J-
°-~;~31l»f3-=¢}¢-4 1542; the Quiche and Cakchiquels of the Highlands had come under the Spanish heel
1 4/zm,z,,. @@ one year earlier, in 1541. We know far less about the people who the Spanish found in
the southern Lowlands, because the conquerors did not thrive in those regions. They
' -m°c-
4'4'"" TU WWe -A-, 4 J- 8a.-.L systematically depopulated the region by enslavement, raiding and conversion, moving
~-7¢¢.4»&n ,. ~.-44 34*,,*_,£
what they called "wild Indians" to Highland or coastal communities established for the
sole purpose of keeping the Maya under control. The last Maya community of any size,
gjjjm \ A 'Vi\, 7'*1*°~~~»
c;83;3 7.
zL31.
the Itza stronghold on Lake Peten-Itza, fell in 1697. The tired remnants, ancestors of
r1»4m.fL-11. W~~4p~l »L~-H, today's Lacandon, were left to roam the forest in small family bands.
At the time of the Conquest, elite Maya held an understanding of the Classic
world that, despite major transformations, brought them closer to the past than we will
1T"¢*°2@5@ ever be. Many of the same deities were worshipped, but most important, they continf
§6mn'5;9.~a,L<
e' IN
f4,8°"''
I m °=» Us
L L L
red to write in the same script as the Classic Maya. These deities and the customs of
Maya sacrifice provoked Spanish outrage. Catholic priests began extirpating the indig»
eros religion; the native books and sculptures were gathered and destroyed.
@Q@ @
m 1 pp in X., ><
Diego de Landa, the first bishop of Yucatan, was recalled to Spain in 1568 by
the Inquisition for his overzealous application of their own religious laws. Landa wrote
his Relacién de las coses de Yucatan, an account of life in Yucatan, as part of his legal
Qs O 8 M 80 %9 8 defense. Although scanty when compared to the volumes written on the New World by
-
friars in central Mexico, Landaus text is an invaluable document. He described the
place, the modern towns, the Maya cyclical rituals and the calendar-even his call for
native manuscripts in order to burn them. Most important for Maya archaeology, Landa
' 44.4 44 - 411 In described a hot afternoon when he sat with a literate Maya informant and asked of him
w5».4 ` B~--=4Mf¢,.7 ~ ?m¢ m .L:4Y»1 his "letters" (Fig. 9). Landa wrote out the Spanish alphabet, and pronouncing each
Spanish letter, he queried his informant for glyphic equivalents, an inappropriate but
FIGURE 9
I., we? 9° understandable attempt on the part of a man who could not imagine that a writing
The "alphabet" recorded in Landa's Relacién de
las coses de Yucatan system worked otherwise. The confused Maya gave him back exactly what he asked
I for-the sound of the Spanish letters written in the syllabary system of the Maya.
I Exasperated at not getting single signs for single letters, Landa told the Maya to write
dinosaurs, the Maya elite, their cities and their art largely vanished within a few gen» anything he wanted. In a wry commentary on his frustration, the Maya wrote ma in kg»
i~ ii, or, in colloquial English, "I don't wanna." For nearly a century Landaus record baf-
elations from the southern Maya Lowlands.
During the Postclassic period, a different kind of Maya culture thrived, even at fled scholars before it was conclusively demonstrated in 195239 that the values he re-
places like Dzibilchaltun, where the collapse had little affect. New styles of architecture corded provided a profound key to Maya writing, of both the Postclassic and Classic
arose; correspondingly, given Lowland Maya patterns, a slightly altered cosmic vision of eras.
how the world worked was in place. Maya inscriptions and art were still made, but the Throughout the New World in the sixteenth century, Spanish friars taught the
glorification of the ruling dynasty was different in character, and the offices may have native nobility how to read and write their own language using the roman script of
become more important than the individuals who held them. Europeans. No native Maya hieroglyphic books recounting extensive mythic narrative
It should be emphasized that the people and their complex society did not survive; one, however, was transcribed into European script in the middle of the six
disappear during the Postclassic period. In Yucatan, Puuc sites, such as Uxmal, Labna, teeth century by a young Quiche noble in Guatemala. The single most important
Sayil and Kabah, continued until A.D. 1100, and a series of confederations, one cen- document of Maya mythology, the Popol Vuh, describes the creation of the world, the
MODERN INVET\
30 THE moon oF KINGS
exciting adventures of the Hero Twins and the legendary origins and history of the humans could see altogether too well. Man "understood everything perfectly," so the
Quiche Maya, one of the groups that dominated the Guatemalan Highlands at the time gods sought to limit his vision and his understanding, for it was not right for man to
of the Conquest. The Popol Vuh stories are not illustrated word for word in the art of have the very power of divinities. The gods gathered together and said, "Now we'll take
the Classic period, but many elements of the story line have compelling parallels in them apart just a little, that's what we need," and changed the nature of human vision.
Classic imagery created seven hundred years before, and some appear to be directly Mankind was "blinded as the face of a mirror is breathed upon. Their eyes were weak-
illustrated, suggesting that these stories are fragments, surviving to the time of the ened. Now it was only when they looked nearby that things were clear. And such was
Conquest, of very ancient myth cycles describing the universe and the origins of gods the loss of the means of understanding, along with the means of knowing
and man. Above all, the Popol Vuh expresses Maya concepts of good and evil, of defeat everything. "41
and victory. The discovery that the Popol Vuh had direct meaning for the Classic Maya Like those first men, our vision, too, is dimmed. We can see only what is close
should be no more surprising than Schliemann's discovery that Homer's works record at hand or what is passed, not what lies ahead. Like all those who have come before us,
real, historical events, couched in mythic terms. we are bound by historical perspectives that will be clear only to our successors, and
The Popol Vuh is divided into four parts. A new translation of the text has they cast a shadow over the mirror in which we look to seek the face of the Classic
shown that the work is conceived as a performance, an oral narrative that could have Maya.
taken days to complete.4° In Part One, great gods gather and attempt to create man
three different times, each time without success. In Parts Two and Three, stories of the
Hero Twins, Hunahpu and Xbalanque, are told, although not in chronological
THE CHARACTEfUSTICS OF MAYA ART
sequence. In Part Two, the Hero Twins defeat evil deities of the earth. Part Three
returns to a time before the birth of the Twins, when their father and uncle were
defeated by the Lords of the Underworld. The Twins were conceived when spittle from
T HE OBJECTS THAT WERE SELECTED TO BE THE BASIS OF THE BL(D()D (JF KINGS ARE
beautiful works of art that touch our sensibilities even without knowledge of their
their father's severed head impregnated an Underworld goddess, who fled from the
meaning. They date from the earliest to the latest periods of the Classic Maya and were
Underworld to the Middleworld to give birth. Like Hercules, the Hero Twins were
imbued with meaning by their makers. They come from palaces, temples and tombs;
demigods whose mission was to overcome divine opponents.
they were made for domestic and ritual life or to accompany the dead into the Afterlife.
The Hero Twins exemplify the Maya definition of a hero, which is fundamen»
They are made from stone, clay and shell, for the use of the individuals who owned
tally different from the hero of Western oral literature. A hero need not overpower his
them, or as public propaganda by the kings who commissioned them. Their importance
enemy. Brute strength is no advantage, nor, as in the case of Western epics, is divine
for us is in their beauty as objects of art and their function as carriers of cultural infer»
intervention from an Upperworld. There is no deus ex machine for the Maya. The
motion. Moreover, they are imprinted with a symbolic language combining imagery
Hero Twins win because they are witty and clever, not because they are purer, stronger,
and writing that was shared by the people who made them.
greater brutes or more faithful to gods Cr ideals. In the Underworld, for example, evil
The experience of art in our own lives does not prepare us to encounter and
lords try to sacrifice the Twins each successive night following ballgame play, and each
understand the role of art and the artist in Maya society. The language of Maya art is
night the lords are unsuccessful_not because they are weak, but because they are
alien to us: it was wrought from a different kind of social experience, its message aimed
outwitted. When the lords substitute Hunahpu's head for the ball in the final ballgame,
at people of another age. To experience Maya art as more than an exotic creation of
Xbalanque in turn substitutes a rabbit, who bounds out of sight, distracting the lords
curious aspect, we must learn to see in a different way and to hear a different message.
and giving Xbalanque time to repair his brother's head. The ability to recognize
The Maya artist was not concerned with creativity and originality as defined by twenti»
falseness and combat it with imaginative, even amusing, solutions is the primary quality
eth-century critics. The content, the media and the function of art were givens, stab»
of the Maya hero.
fished by cultural experience, education, and tradition. The artist had little control
When a Maya king died, like the Hero Twins he descended into the Under» over subject matter or iconography; individual creativity was demonstrated by the
world to enter into a contest with the evil Lords of Death. He had prepared himself refinement of execution, in innovations of style and i: i the use of subtle metaphor that
mentally to combat terror with wit in order to survive the Underworld trials and be at times approaches visual word play.
reborn as a celestial body. Thus, mental quickness regenerates Maya kingship, perpet- Technologically, the Maya must be classified as Stone Age artisans, since all
uating a cycle from earth to Underworld to Upperworld. This sophisticated wit is still sculpture, architectural construction, and lapidary art were executed without the use of
perceived by modern Maya in Honduras, Belize, Mexico and Guatemala today to be metal. Preferred sculptural media were the softer, more pliable stones, such as the lime»
the sine qua non of a great man. Verbal quickness, repartee and humor based on pun- stone characteristic of the Maya Lowlands. To some degree stylistic development was
ning are, for example, highly respected among the Maya. formed by the properties of locally available stone. For example, Palenque sculptors
In Part Four of the Popol Vuh, the gods successfully create man from maize. preferred wall-mounted slabs to stelae, perhaps because their local limestone, although
Unlike the gods' previous creations of animals and men from mud and wood, this one an excellent medium for relief, was too brittle to use for freestanding stelae. By con»
was successful: the maize men could praise their creators and acknowledge their debt to trast, the tuff available in the Copan Valley gave rise to a brilliant, fully volumetric
them. When the gods saw what they had made, however, they realized that these sculptural style, the rival of any European tradition. Harder stones from the volcanic
CHAR,
Highlands, such as jade, fuchsite, serpentine, specular hematite and obsidian, and
shell from the Lowlands became the preferred material for small sacred objects and
jewelry. Plaster, clay and wood were also exploited, although little wood carving
has survived the ravages of a tropical environment. Weaving in cotton, palm, reed
henequen and other fibers was also a highly developed art, as were feather work and
feather mosaic but like wood. these media do not survive archaeologically We can
y reconstruct their rich development from the pictures of clothing shown in other
media. Finally, although onl small portion of painting and calligraphy survives on
walls, stone objects, pottery vessels, plastered objects and in fig-bark paper books, the
Maya clearly established one of the great painting traditions of the world
Maya art did not develop spontaneously The Maya inherited artistic tech
niques media and much of the imagery developed by early Mesoamerican cultural
traditions. Techniques for carving hard and soft stones in relief as fully vol
metric styles were invented and exploited by the Olmec of the Gulf Coast in the Earl
Preclassic period. At the same time, in the highlands of Guerrero, sophisticated wall
paintings showing Olmec iconography were executed at the caves of Oxtotitlan and
luxtlahuaca; and a tradition of architectural sculpture, also using symbols indistin
guishable from those used in the Gulf Coast Olmec region flourished at the new
discovered site at Teopantequanitla and nearby Chalcatzingo
The stone stele, the most important sculptural format to be used by the Classic
Maya, appeared at La Venta and in Guerrero by the Middle Preclassic period. By 600
B.c. many different peoples throughout Mesoamerica were using Olmec symbols
their own art and the stele was in use in the Chiapas and Guatemalan Highlands. By
100 B.c. the stele had become the dominant format among the peoples living at Izapa
Kaminaljuyu El Baul, Abaj Takalik and Chalchuapa. By 50 B.c., Lowland Maya had
experimented with the stele, adding it to their expressive repertoire as a major narrative
format by the second century A.D The Hauberg Stela (Pl. 66), the earliest known
dated Lowland Maya monument, is inscribed with a date in the year A.D. 199, but
eventually even earlier dates will surely emerge as archaeological investigations of Late
Preclassic level continue
The indigenous artistic form of the Lowland Maya was architectural sculpture
executed in plaster over stone armatures. These large works, which are on a scale with
the freestanding colossal heads of the Olmec, first appeared in architecture on pyr
amidal terraces at Tikal, El Mirador, Lamanai, Cerros (Fig. II. 1) and Uaxactun as
150 B.c. Earlier societies in Mesoamerica had experimented with architectural sculp
tune, but the medium was stone, the technique shallow relief and the impact limited
FIGURE 10
Because the first successful Maya exploitation of public art for political goals was in
Corbel vaults form of architectural sculpture, architecture became the principal vehicle of all public
House A and the west gallery of House C, the Palace at art throughout subsequent Maya history. Architecture was programmed with symbolic
Palenque, Chiapas
Late Classic period, A.D. 675-750
information expressed in sculpture or painting. Substructures bore huge masks. Outer
surfaces of bearing walls were often covered with relief sculpture, usually executed
. laster. The entablatures and roofcombs were sculpted in relief or volumetric imagery
Door lintels. whether wooden beams or stone slabs, could be carved with relief images
Interior benches were carved or painted, and stone slabs and plaster reliefs were app
to interior walls. Stelae were mounted in the plaza spaces between buildings, and their
programming was often related to the surrounding architectural imagery
Interior space in Maya stone architecture imitated the characteristic shape of
The stone stele, the most important sculptural format to be used by the Classic mundane objects into power instruments for use in ritual. .lade pectoral
Early Classic period, A.D. 400-600
Maya, appeared at La Venta and in Guerrero by the Middle Preclassic period. By 600 In Maya art, and in all great art styles, the formal properties of art-the way in The Baltimore Museum of Art
B.c. many different peoples throughout Mesoamerica were using Olmec symbols in which an image could be presented-were limited by tradition and technology. Each This delightful jade is identified as the ]guar God of the
their own art and the stele was in use in the Chiapas and Guatemalan Highlands. By society also has its own natural way 7 seeing and producing images. The decisions Underworld by the distinctive cruller that surrounds the
eyes of his youthful face.
100 B.c. the stele had become the dominant format among the peoples living at Izapa, about reality that comprise these ways of seeing are often unconsciously made, learned
Kaminaljuyu, El Baul, Abaj Takalik and Chalchuapa. By 50 B.c., Lowland Maya had by children as they grow to understand their world and to create two-dimensional imag-
experimented with the stele, adding it to their expressive repertoire as a major narrative ery that refers to their three-dimensional experience. We do not know the cultural
format by the second century A.D. The Hauberg Stela (Pl. 66), the earliest known source of these artistic decisions, or why the Maya considered their particular set of
dated Lowland Maya monument, is inscribed with a date in the year A.D. 199, but decisions to be the best solution. But because we too carry culturally acquired ways of
eventually even earlier dates will surely emerge as archaeological investigations of Late seeing that are different from those of the Maya, it is helpful in deciphering Maya
Preclassic level continue." imagery to consider some of the ways that their visual canon differs from our own.
The indigenous artistic form of the Lowland Maya was architectural sculpture The Maya artist did not regard light and shadow to be significant information
executed in plaster over stone armatures. These large works, which are on a scale with in two»dimensional representation. Shadow is never reproduced by change in color,
the freestanding colossal heads of the Olmec, first appeared in architecture on pyr- tone, hue or by the application of modeled shades of gray. The Maya were simply not
amidal terraces at Tikal, El Mirador, Larnanai, Cerros (Fig. II. 1) and Uaxactun as early interested in creating the illusion of shadows-chiaroscuro in traditional art historical
as 150 B.c. Earlier societies in Mesoamerica had experimented with architectural sculpt terminology. 44 However, using natural light sources the Maya created shadows on volu»
tune, but the medium was stone, the technique shallow relief and the impact limited. metric and relief sculptures, as in the architectural sculpture at Copan (Pls. 57, 110).
Because the first successful Maya exploitation of public art for political goals was in the Volumetric sculpture was carved to produce modeled patterns of light and shadow.
form of architectural sculpture, architecture became the principal vehicle of all public Costume objects such as pectorals (Fig. 11), belt heads and headdress elements, were
the Palace at art throughout subsequent Maya history. Architecture was programmed with symbolic often manufactured in half-round forms with a flat, back plane for attachment. The
information expressed in sculpture or painting. Substructures bore huge masks. Outer outer surfaces were modeled so that light and shadow would naturally emphasize these
surfaces of bearing walls were often covered with relief sculpture, usually executed in sculpted features. In relief carving, shadow cast across relief defines the line, as seen on
plaster. The entablatures and roofcombs were sculpted in relief or volumetric imagery. Yaxchilan Lintel 24 (Pl. 62), with its deeper carving, and on Yaxchilan Lintel 17 (Pl.
Door lintels, whether wooden beams or stone slabs, could be carved with relief images. 64), with its shallow relief.
Interior benches were carved or painted, and stone slabs and plaster reliefs were applied Flat color was applied to sculpted or smooth surfaces, with variation usually
to interior walls. Stelae were mounted in the plaza spaces between buildings, and their A achieved by diluting the pigment, as in thin washes of codex-style pottery painting (Pls.
programming was often related to the surrounding architectural imagery. 115, l 16) rather than mixing pigments. Maya color was often translucent, so overlap»
Interior space in Maya stone architecture imitated the characteristic shape of ping strokes would cause changes in hue, seen in the paintings at Bonampak (Pl. 38a).
on Yaxchilan Stela 11 (Fig. V. 5a), to the visual field; and tri-figural compositions (Fig. 4 and interior benches (Fig. 13b) as a logical motivation for placing figures on different Late Classic period, A.D. 650-800
II. 7), began with the presentation of parents flanking the ruler as a statement of legits levels. The Kimbell wall panel (Pl. 86) uses this architectural device, but the most The Pauahtuns and their female attendants are arranged
in two registers. The upper set of figures sit in a row as if a
mate claim. In the Late Classic period, multifigure compositions were exploited, but extraordinary examples, showing the most complex architectural configurations, are groundline had been drawn under them.
usually on wall-mounted panels like Piedras Negras Lintel Z (Pl. 40), throne backs, l found on Fiedras Negras Stela 12 (Fig. V.8) and in the compositions of murals in Room
FIGURE 13h
building walls, like the Bonampak paintings (Pl. 38), or in other formats with a domi- Z (Fig. V.6) and Room 3 at Bonampak.
Detail, cylindrical vessel
nant horizontal axis. Particularly in the Late Classic period, relative position in space was indicated The Art Museum, Princeton University
Spatial illusion in two-dimensional art was severely limited, and the optical by overlap. Some Maya artists, especially at sites in the western area, were accor» See also Plate I 15
devices used to imply position in space were very few. Most pictorial representations in pushed practitioners of foreshortening (Fig. 14). They became quite adept at represent~ The architectural elements of a building platform and a
both stone relief (Pls. 1, 40) and pottery painting (Pls. 48, llama) used a groundline to bench are used by the artist to justify placing the figures
ing bodies in twisted and other unusual postures. Particular skill was used in represent-
on different vertical levels. The doorway, curtain and roof
establish the setting of a scene. People and objects were shown from only two points of ing the cross-legged, seated position and the sideview of body parts, such as shoulders, decoration of the temple function as a framing device for
view, frontal and profile, which could be combined in ingenious ways, as in the twisted as on the Kimbell panel (Fig. 15). Captives and ballplayers were subjects that permitted the scene.
back view of the captive on the middle level of Piedras Negras Stela 12 (Fig. V.8). artistic experimentation with contorted body positions. The captive on Tonina Monu~
Objects were arranged on the groundline in a logical manner. Human figures always rent 122 (Fig.v. l 1) twists his upper torso, looking behind him, and the legs of the
i
[Ive at a smaller stand on it (Pl. 48), and even when the groundline was not drawn, figures are arranged fallen ballplayer (PI. 101) are awkwardly twisted. Apparently the conventions of draw-
or importance as if it were there (Fig. lea). Overlapping, not position in picture plane or relative ing these secondary figures were much less rigid.
horizontal space
scale, is used to show position in space, as in the group of captives on the bottom level Maya art, both painting and sculpture, shows a marked sensitivity to the
of Piedras Negras Stela 12. Changes in size have meaning, such as indicating relative boundaries of the pictorial field, notably through the many innovative devices artists
rank (Fig. 12), but smaller size does not refer to distance. Color and value are not used to break them. Most compositions are framed by borders, some plain bands (PI.
changed by distance. Maya art gives the impression that all the action takes place 86), others glyphic (Pl. 1) or figural. The most accomplished and innovative artist
within two feet of a blank wall, an effect particularly evident in Piedras Negras Lintel 2 it defined these framing bands as cosmic or architectural elements, as on Piedras Negras
(Pl. 40). Any action or object that violates these rules can be taken to be supernatural; Stela 11 (Fig. II.4). In a tour de force of spatial manipulation, the "Cookie Cutter"
for example, the floating figures of Ixlu Stela 2 (Fig. IV.3) are gods. Master of Yaxchilan arranged the glyphs on the rear of Stela II (Fig. V. 5a) to reproduce
The use of groundlines as the major spatial device made it easy to arrange ml» the stepped contour of a corbeled vault. Bird ]aguar stands inside the building; his
tiple figures in horizontal compositions. This device was also used by painters who victims kneel on the step in front of it. Many artists focus attention on these framing
worked on pottery walls, since the horizontal axis was usually the longer one. Figures devices by violating them: feathers overlap them; hands hold them; supernaturals climb
can be shown in processional sequence with minimal overlap of individuals, as on r
on them; body parts vanish behind them or overlap them. Cn the Art Institute of
Piedras Negras Lintel 2. These long horizontal picture planes can also be broken up into Chicago panel (Pl. 101), the foot of the fallen player overlaps the frame. At some sites,
different episodes, often distinguished by the direction in which the figures face (Pl. imagery in the framing bands was used to carry cosmological information separate from
68). However, the format of the stele is usually vertical, making compositions of mul- the narratives, such as the use of the Cosmic Monster to form the band and genealogi»
tiple figures difficult to compose and, therefore, unusual. Several compositional solu- cal information about the protagonist, as on Yaxchilan Stela 11 (Fig. V.5a,b). Glyphic
(Fig. V.3). I
1
limestone panel called the Oval Palace Tablet, has fallen from the wall, revealing an
The Maya focused attention on three moments in the continuous sequence of underlying master drawing that was used as a guide by the plasterers (Fig. 18). Parts of
ritual experience: the inceptive, the progressive and the completive. The inceptive the master drawing for the carved reliefs on King Pacal's stone sarcophagus in the Tern-
moment is either just before or just after a sequence begins. In Bonampak Room 1 (Pl. ple of Inscriptions (Pl. 119) have also been preserved, perhaps due to the necessity of a
38), lords stand around in informal groups as the chief attendant turns his head to get quick burial. These drawings were painted on the stone sides before the burial chamber
last-minute instructions from his king. At Palenque, the king designate leans in antici- was built, and the relief was carved after the chamber was completed.
pation toward his father, who is beginning to pass the crown to his son (Fig. II. 7). In both examples, a line drawing was applied in black paint by a master callig-
The progressive moment shows part of an ongoing action. At Yaxchilan, Lady rapher. Lines in the drawing are about onefeighth of an inch thick and of relatively
Xoc stares at her vision (Pl. 62), or her hands are frozen mids action as she pulls a even width throughout. The artist pulled long, flowing strokes, some of them continu-
barbed rope through her tongue (Pl. 63). The stream of blood given by Bird ]aguar is ous pulls over a length of two feet or more. Only the Chinese style brush can hold
poised midway on its fall to the censer in front of his feet (Pl. 76). enough paint to pull such a long stroke over a porous surface like plaster or limestone
FiguRE I 5
The completive moment occurs when the ritual is done. On the Leiden Plaque while maintaining such precise control over line width and quality. Detail, captives from a carved panel
(Pl. 33), the king who was installed is shown wearing the full regalia of kingship. The Maya drawings and paintings show a freehand execution. Producing such a See also Plate 86
ripened as he transformation process shown at its inception at Palenque is completed. long stroke while retaining a controlled line required the artist to work rapidly, sustain a The three captive are drawn with fluid motion, animated
gestures and body positions. Overlapping is used to signal
Tension was achieved by an extraordinary device developed at sites along the light touch, and pivot his arm from his shoulder. Linear paintings in the tombs at Rio
position in space. The progression of the hand from the
Usumacinta River. At Bonampak and Yaxchilan, lintels of the three doors of a single Azul and in Burial 48 at Tikal were executed so rapidly that excess paint fell from the mouth of the left figure to the forehead of the kneeling
building were programmed to give one level of information in the narrative scenes and rapidly moving brush, forming drip patterns that were retained as part of the imagery. central figure to the extended gesture of the seated figure
on the right suggests a sense of ongoing activity.
another in the text.46 Each image shows a moment in a single ritual; together they The spontaneity and calligraphic quality of these paintings could not be achieved by
encompass the entire ritual sequence. By contrast, the texts specify that this ritual took tracing previously prepared master drawings.
place at different times, and at Bonampak, with different actors. The contents of inscriptions and pictorial compositions, as well as the relative
_, Tension was also achieved between two»dimensional and three-dimensional proportions of each part of the whole composition, may have been worked out in
imagery. Early Classic clay artists often began an image on the body of a pot with a advance. Guidelines indicating placements for glyphic blocks and pictorial elements
drawing or incision but completed it in a three-dimensional extrusion from the lid. exist in the Dresden Codex and in the wall paintings of the Rio Azure tombs. An unfin-
Thus, a pot lid could represent a bird, its wings, tail and body painted in line, its head ished hieroglyphic stair at Dos Pilas has glyph blocks and rectangular shapes for figures
emerging three-dimensionally from the surface to become the handle (Pl. 105). This cut away from the background stone, but the next two steps in the process-adding the
tension between two-dimensional and three»dimensional imagery is also characteristic master drawing and carving it into the stone-were never done (Fig. 19).
of the sculpture of Piedras Negras and Tonina, although the most successful examples Mistakes in computation, drawing and execution provide interesting informal
are found in the zoomorphs of Quirigua and the architectural sculpture of Copan. son about the artist. At Palenque, Dos Pilas and elsewhere, blatant errors of math»
Line was preeminent throughout all periods of Maya art, which rivaled the ematical computation or in the use of signs were not corrected. Either the Maya did not
Chinese and the ]apanese as one of the world's great calligraphic traditions. The pri- proofread the first drafts made by the masters, or errors were considered to be divine
mary tool used in Maya writing and painting was the brush (Fig. 16). Like written intervention and protected from correction." The frequency of such mistakes also sug»
Chinese, Maya script was linear and calligraphic in nature. The use of the brush as the gests that the process of creating the master drawing was a ritual occasion of major
principal writing tool profoundly affected both the graphic configuration of writing and importance that included fasting, bloodletting and, perhaps, heavy drinking of Maya
the style of pictorial art. beer, called bache. If so, the masters were probably not at their best when they drew the
No writing brushes have survived archaeologically, but brushes are depicted in master painting.
painted sources. In scenes painted on pottery, scribes use paint pots made from conch I
Works at Palenque suggest that a sculpted relief based on a drawing was pro-
shells (Pl. 44) and pointed brushes made of flexible animal hair. The clearest represent duced by other artists, usually more than one. Examination of the Palace Tablet and the
ration of a Maya brush now known, which was incised on a bone excavated from Burial sarcophagus in the Temple of Inscriptions shows the hand of the master drawing to be
uniform, but the execution of the modeled relief varies in technique and skill. The
most accomplished sculptors carved the figures and important parts of the inscriptions;
craftsmen of lesser skill were allowed to work on less sensitive areas. Most interestingly,
the craftsmen who applied the plaster and carved the relief of the two drawings
described above did not follow exactly the lines of the master. Sculptors apparently
1'
9
.r...
_.,.4
I exercised their own judgment in finishing the sculpture, using the master drawing only Flcuaf 19
-I
-- as a guide, since the sculptor was a master in his own right and finished the final surface Unfinished step from a Hieroglyphic Stair at
accordion Dos Pilas, Guatemala
g to his own sense of aesthetics. Late Classic period, ca. A.D. 700
Since most Maya draftsmanship was freehand drawing, accuracy, especially in Fhoro by Merle Greene Robertson
delineating important symbols, was controlled by convention.'*** Certainly, an artist did
metrical vessel
not bring the king and his attendants to a prepared stone or wall to sit for their por-
traits. The configurations of imagery were conventions, learned very probably by rote,
with training beginning in childhood. Maya artists were born into their profession, MAYA GODS AND ICONS
although particularly able individuals were probably absorbed into the lineage groups
specializing in the scribal arts. The recently excavated residential compound of one
such scribal lineage at Copan indicates that scribes and artists were high on the social
ladder.4"
M AYA ART WAS A COMPLEX SYMBOLIC LANGUAGE WITH PROFOUNDLY IMPORTANT
social functions. It was mainly commissioned by kings and other high elite to fulfill
Smaller object s, such as pottery and jade, appear to have been produced by their political and social purposes. Since art communicated the message of the king to
only one hand. However, we do not know if the potter also painted his works, or if the his subjects, the artist was confined to producing works that affirmed a shared reality.
lapidary artist had assistants to help block in an image. Skill levels, as with monumental 1
These constraints did not, however, inhibit the creation of an art of such sensuality and
art, are varied. Masters of superlative skill worked on special vessels, but workshops power that it has reached us across the centuries, even when its message was not under»
appear to have mass-produced pottery mediocre in construction and painting. Wealth- stood. As we decipher the writing system and decode the imagery, we are learning to
ier and more prestigious patrons probably acquired the higher»quality products. understand this message, which, since it is not addressed to us or our sensibilities, is
Clay sculpture was made by both slab and coil techniques, and their surfaces sometimes disturbing. But by reclaiming its meaning, even in part, we will preserve it as
were modeled, incised and painted with clay slips and mineral pigments. Plaster part of the heritage of all humanity.
grounds were used as paint bases on pottery vessels, as well as on walls and in books. In many ways, Maya monumental art is best understood, not as the portrait of
l, Guatemala Plaster artisans used mold casting, additive techniques and subtractive modeling. Usuf people, but as the portrait of ritual. The combination of writing with imagery allowed
ally a stone armature was inserted to reinforce the interior of such sculpture, which is the time, location, action and actor to be described with absolute precision. Glyphic
found in styles ranging from shallow relief to fully three»dimensional. texts reinforced visual narratives recording rituals, documenting a specific ritual involv-
Although evidence is scanty, it appears that artists shared common pattern ing a named individual at a particular time and place. Maya narrative sculpture froze
books, knew of one another's work, and even trained together. At Mul-Chic, for exam- the moment of ritual in time, but since it continued to exist, this art became the means
ple, the drawing of the prominent seated warrior in the paintings resembles so closely by which society was instructed in correct behavior. The historical precedent thus
that of Ruler Seven on the top of Piedras Negras Stela 12 that one artist seems to have established was intended to guide posterity.
copied the other. The contours of a captive displayed by Bird ]aguar on the La Pasadita Since art had to communicate cultural information, it was restricted to symbol-
|
lintel in Berlin is nearly identical to a captive painted in the Bonampak paintings, I
ism and imagery whose meanings were shared by members of the Maya community.
nearly thirty years later, but the Bonampak figure is reversed, as if an intermediate The visual symbol system in Maya art worked like a language, and, as with a spoken
tracing had been made. We also suspect that skilled artisans accompanied royal wives language, individual taste and creative expression had to be subordinated to the
into foreign tribute and may have been exchanged as tribute. imperative of communication. Arbitrary change could not be tolerated. If, in order to
The Maya created one of the great art traditions of the world, one that stands express personal choice or aesthetic judgment, an artist changed the form of a temple so
beside the art of the ancient Egyptians or the early Chinese. Maya painting is both that it looked like a residential building; or altered the way a god was drawn so that its
stallion around
powerful in its imagery and execution and elegant in its line work; the fine incisions on attributes could no longer be discerned; or invented new emblems to mark the rank of a
shell and jade are precise, yet lyrical in style. Small figurines were modeled from clay king or lineage head, then the purpose of this art would have been lost. Because of its
with all the detail and presence of life-size stone and plaster portraits of rulers and gods. social function, Maya iconography was of necessity conservative.
As much attention was paid to the execution and the message conveyed on a small The symbolism of Maya art identified the role of individuals in their immediate
bone handle for a fan as was spent on the huge architectural monuments that celebrated context, as well as in relationship to the larger Maya world and to the Maya cosmos.
the deeds of kings and the order of the universe. Maya art communicates powerfully The proper order of society, the role of the king, commoners and nobles alike, was
with people of the twentieth century, yet at the same time transmits in eloquent detail expressed in permanent and public form through art. Imagery described the cosmos,
the world view, beliefs and history of the people who made it. the origin of supernatural power and how to manipulate it, the reason for the existence
object-a wristlet, an ear flare or a cloth sash, for example_the personification head has two heads and a single body (Fig. 22). The body may he rendered as crocodilian or by a band
of symbols, most commonly the skyband. The front head has a long snout, a beard and large
signals that these objects have accumulated sacred power.
teeth and its eye is always lidded and often includes either a Venus or a crossed-bands sign. It has
Individual entities that appear visually and glyphically unrelated can be the
the ears of a deer and often has deer hooves as well. The body of this monster belongs to the
same gods. For example, the sun can appear as a young male, an aged male, an front head; it is not a fusion of two bodies.
anthropomorph with jaguar features or a half-skeletal zoomorph with a sun»bowl on its In contrast to the front head, the rear head is usually inverted because it was carried as a
forehead. These contrasting and superficially unrelated forms appear to express dif- burden by the crocodile. This head has a blunt snout, fleshy eyes and a skeletal lower jaw. The
ferent aspects of the same entity-in this case the newly risen sun, the sun near sunset, forehead is a deep bowl with an inverted rim fused with the glyphic sign of the sun, kin. Atop the
the sun in the Underworld and the sun as a cosmic object. Each version is complete, bowl rest three symbols: crossed bands, a stingray spine and a shell. This four fpart configuration
nd personmed forms
and yet they are all related variations on the same subject. In any given scene, normally is known as the Quadripartite Badge; in instances when the rear head appears detached from the
only one aspect will be presented. crocodile, it is called the Quadripartite Monster.
In Maya religious thinking, all of these supernatural entities could enter human The Celestial Monster is composed of the paired opposition of Venus and the sun. As the
Morning Star, Venus leads the sun out of the Underworld and trails behind it at sunset. The
space as physical beings, and humans are depicted interacting with them in a real,
physical sense. The vision quest provided one means of access to the divine, the letting
Monster appears to represent the dawn with the sun following Venus; the concept of the journey
and its westerly direction is also implicit in the image. When the Monster is used on architect
of the ruler's blood another. The costumes characteristic of gods were worn by the
tune, it is generally placed so that the front head is on the western side of the building. in both
nobility during these events. Images of these rites show humans wearing full-body cos»
pictorial and architectural contexts, it frames portals or creates a framing band, or it may form a
tunes, including masks, to transform themselves symbolically into gods. These scenes throne or altar. Rarely, it can be held as a scepter by a king.
FIGURE 2 l do not appear to represent playacting but, rather, a true transformation into a divine
de e r e ar from Deg pe rs onM e d wi ng s k y b a nd b o d y rear head mverled
being. However, the Maya maintained a clear distinction between images of a true god
and those of a human transformed into a god, by showing a cutaway, or X-ray, view of
the mask that revealed the human profile inside. Ve nus
si gn
The nomenclature for Maya gods currently suffers from inconsistency. At the C e l e s nal B ud
shell
turn of the century, the glyphic names and pictorial images of the gods were first recogf stingray
nized in the Postclassic codices and given designations in an alphabetic system. The spi ne
c ro ssed » b a nd s
same gods, however, had also been given names based on their functions or their associ-
§II§
ation with deity descriptions compiled by friars after the Conquest, or from Yucatec Quadriparme Badge (crossed-band
cauac SIQT1 Stingray spme, shell and bowl)
Maya literature, such as the Chilam Balam. The problem was further exacerbated as
new deities and deity complexes were named without reference to earlier terminology. blood s tre am
ance s t o r blood s tre am
Thus, the same god may be assigned designations in more than one system of FIGURE 22
n omenclat ure.
This confused nomenclature is obviously imperfect, Many of the names of gods
i ron! he ad crocodde toot re ar he ad
are sterile and have nothing to do with the nature of the deity or with his importance in
cross-banded eye
Maya cosmology. Since Classic Maya mythology is not yet fully understood, however,
Celestial Monster from Copan Altar 41
invention of another set of terms at this time would only compound the problem. FIGURE 23
Therefore, this study uses the existing names but is restricted to the most common and The Cauac Monster c a u a c m a rk i n g s M ai ze God fonte ne l or portal
frequently recognized names for each god. Maya mythology and painting are filled with The Cauac Monster (Fig. 23) is always zoomorphic. Its distinguishing features are a cluster of
hundreds of supernaturals. While it is not possible to catalogue them all, the most loops that look like grapes, or three disks forming a triangle and a partial circle with a dotted
important ones are described here as a guide for the reader. perimeter. its eyes are half closed and its forehead is indented by a stepped cleft, out of which »foliated ear
o r nam e nt wi t h
maize may grow (Fig. 23a). The Monster generally appears as a head only, but on the roof of the M ai ze God
Temple of the Cross at Palenque, in one of its few appearances with a body, it has reptilian legs.
The Cauac Monster is the essence of stone; like rock it is a thing of the ground. It represents
openings in rock and in buildings made of rock. It is carved on huge boulders used as altars and \ ,
mouth emanation muzzle earflare assemblage
shown in painted and carved scenes as stone altars and pedestals (Fig. 23b). When it is shown in
stacks, it represents stony walls. The distinctive features of the Monster are shared by the glyph Cauac Monster from Bonampak Stela 1
FIGURE 24
bigs m
so water scroll zoomorphic Dersoruhcation heat waler»s!ream body
frayed area
cauac marking
personified year sngn
Vision Serpents
persomtled blood
blood scroll
blood scrolls
Stone ax head from Dumbarton Oaks
Panel FIGURE 25
fang Sky
Persons»ed eccemnc The symbol for sky is a band divided into compartments by vertical bars (Fig. 26). Each
Cauac Monster from the Metropolitan Pot flint from Tablet of the
Slave. Palenque
compartment is filled by the symbol for a particular star, constellation or planet, many of which
are as yet undeciphered. Skybands may appear as the body of the Celestial Monster, as frames
The Water-lily Monster
around a scene or as a bench; they are often on the borders of cloth, as though they represented
in Lowland Maya languages, the words for water-lily and lake are hotnonyms, hence, the water»
the concept of an edge.
lily and its personifications are natural symbols for water. In one primary form, the water-lily is
shown as a zoomorphic head, with a mirror or Kan-cross in its forehead (Fig. 24a). Rootlike
projections emerge from the top and stems, and pads and blossoms rise from these root forms. In
an alternative form, a water-lily pad is tied across the forehead by a stem and a blossom, and the
:7
H 9 }§;==.~:f31 < I 848 m'll%H 1
FIGURE 26
body is rendered as a fish with another, smaller fish nibbling at its tail (Fig. Z4b). This configura- S ky-B and
tion represents the god of the number 13 and the personification of tun ("year") in Long Count
Earth
dates. The Water-lily Monster is the symbol of standing bodies of water, such as the ocean,
The earth was represented by bands with coiled spirals characteristic of the glyph caban, a day
lakes, swamps and agricultural canals." Moreover, because water-lilies were abundant in the
sign (the word cab means "earth") (Fig. 27). No personified form of the earth has yet been
canals used by the Maya, they became the symbol of the earth's abundance.
identified.
caban signs
water stacks DIossom pad fl$h
root form
/firm FIGURE 27
pad
E a rt h B a n d
Flcunf 24 Water
water SCI©ll zoomorphic persomflcallon head waterstream body
Water was represented by a series of signs, including a shell, lines of dots (usually alternating
Water-llly Monster-suriace of water groups of small and large dots) and a short stack of graduated rectangular shapes that by their
configuration suggest a loaded canoe (Fig. 28a). These signs can be set in a line representing the
The Vision Serpent surface of water, or they may be arranged within and around a thick line that is usually marked
The hallucinatory visions central to Maya ritual were symbolized visually by a rearing snake with the water-dot pattern (Fig. 28b). Images of water-lilies or their glyphic counterparts can be
(Fig. 25a). Most Vision Serpents have smooth bodies, but some also show areas of flayed skin set among these water signs.
na slgn fish blossom FIGURE 28
and, in some cases, feathered bodies. Serpent heads have long, sometimes bulbous snouts, and shell scroll
most are bearded. The person contacted through the vision is shown emerging from a gaping
coo water-lily
mouth. In the most common representation of the Vision Serpent, the end of the tail is sur- O O
o oo monster
mounted by a second head with completely different features. This rear head can be replaced by /
Water Bands
Kan-cross
GI, the oldest of the Triad siblings, has the same name as his father. but the name is in the form
of a portrait head, and its reading is not known (Fig. 31). One of the glyphs that appears in
name phrase may read Hun-Ahpu, matching the name of one of the Hero Twins from the Popol
GI Vuh. He is associated with Venus, but since he also appears at Quirigua as the number 4. which
The Palenque Triad is more commonly represented as the Sun God. he could also be identified with the sun
FIGURE 30
dual identification with Venus and the sun is echoed in the Hero Twin myth in some versions
Hunahpu becomes the Sun. but others. he becomes Venus."
GI rarely appears on painted pottery, but his image is common on Early Classic cache vessels
and the kings represented on Stela 2 at Tikal and Stela I at Copan wear GI masks. He has
scalloped eyebrows, square eyes and a Roman nose. His front teeth are often replaced by a
shark's tooth or filed into a T-shape, and he wears fishfins on his cheeks. A shell earflare and
headdress of the Quadripartite Monster, often combined with a Water Bird fete his
appearance
Ouadnpartne
Monster
Water Bird
shell earflare
Tish in
zero sign
The Palenque Triad" is a trio of gods, GI, GII and GIII, celebrated as divine ancestors by the GI/Chao-Xib-Chac Flshmg on the TlkaI Bone Ax-wielder iron the Metropolitan Pot
kings of Palenque (Fig. 30). The three gods were born eighteen days apart to parents whose
births occurred before the beginning of the present era. The first- and secondfborn, GI ("G»
e one") and GIII ("G-three"), are prototypes of the Popol Vuh Hero Twins. These two gods in GII (God K)
particular appear in several forms with different visual features and names; these manifestations GII ("G-two") has long been recognized and as such has acquired many different names, such as
F1cupJs 29 God K, Bolon Dzacab, the Flare God and the Manikin Scepter. He is always zoomorphic (Fig.
are nonetheless aspects of the same deity complex.
33) and frequently has a serpent-headed foot. His body has reptilian features, but his hands and
GI one foot are always human. His most characteristic feature is a forehead mirror punctured by a
GI, the oldest of the Triad siblings, has the same name as his father, but the name is in the form Celt, a smoking Celt, a smoking cigar, a smoking torch or a ceramic torch holder. The torch sign
of a portrait head, and its reading is not known (Fig. 31). One of the glyphs that appears in his is a phonetic complement designating that the mirror is made from a material that sounds like
name phrase may read Hun-Ahpu, matching the name of one of the Hero Twins from the Popol the word for torch, pronounced tab in Mayan languages. Since obsidian is also ah, GII is "the
Gill Vuh. He is associated with Venus, but since he also appears at Quirigua as the number 4, which obsidian mirror." A mirror can replace his head (Fig. 33d), or the mirror alone can stand for his
is more commonly represented as the Sun God, he could also be identified with the sun. This name (Fig. 33c).
dual identification with Venus and the sun is echoed in the Hero Twin myth; in some versions, GII, the third-born of the Triad brothers, was particularly important to elite lineages and to
F I GUR E 3 0
Hunahpu becomes the Sun, hut in others, he becomes Venus." rulers. His portrait glyph often occurs in rulers' names. He forms the scepter that appears on
GI rarely appears on painted pottery, but his image is common on Early Classic cache vessels, many different official occasions, including accession, and he is profoundly associated with sac-
and the kings represented on Stela 2 at Tikal and Stela I at Copan wear GI masks. He has rifice, in particular, with self»inflicted bloodletting. Throughout this work, he is called God K.
o
scalloped eyebrows, square eyes and a Roman nose. His front teeth are often replaced by a smoke scrolls
o shark's tooth or filed into a T»shape, and he wears fishfins on his cheeks. A shell ear flare and a
as headdress of the Quadripartite Monster, often combined with a Water Bird, complete his
appearance.
Ouadrvpartxte
8 0a
Monster nnrror
smoke
Water Blrd
Glyphic version with the mirror replacing
god markings the head
wISh
dark mirror
snake foot
FIGURE 31 mouth emanation
Gil God K or the Manlkln Scepter FIGURE 33
squint-eye
Kln Sign
Kln sign
squint-eye
Sur god Gill as the Sur god GIII-glyphic name GIII written as Ahau Km Sur god pectoral
Kin svgn
His hair is pulled into a bound knot above the forehead: he has a jaguar ear above his ear flare
gathered hair
and, most characteristic of all, he has a twisted device. called cruller" (named for the pastry)
placed between and under his eyes. Kings wore this cruller when they impersonated GIII
The jaguar God of the Underworld rules the number 7. Since he is the most common image
jaguar cruller on shields, he is thought to be a patron of war. He rarely appears as an actor in narrative scenes
cruller
jaguar but he is the most frequent main head represented on Late Classic incensarios.56 He probably
represents the sun when it is in the Underworld
kln sign
has a long, hound hank of hair that falls forward, and his front teeth are often filed into a T-shape.
He is the god of the number 4 and presumably the daytime sun. He appears in both youthful and GIII as the Water-lily jaguar
aged aspects, hut it is not known if these are, in fact, the same divinity at different ages, or if they This form of GIII is entirely zoomorphic, but he walks and acts like a human. His special
are different person entirely. attribute is a water-lily blossom or leaf lying atop his head, which may be a reference to the
The most important title of kings, Mah k'ina, could be written in a personified form as the jaguar's love of water (Fig. 37). He sometimes wears a special necklace, called a death»eye collar,
FI G U RE 34
Sun God, and the Sun God also appears as a pectoral worn by royal persons, both male and but his normal attire is a wide scarf tied at the throat. His association with the GIII complex
female. He rarely appears as an actor in pottery or monumental scenes. derives from the appearance of the kin sign on his belly and from the use of the "sun/decapitated
jaguar" phrase as his name. He can be a substitute for the Baby jaguar in the sacrificial death
tied hank of hair dance scene, and his head is worn on the belts of kings. He is a frequent character in Maya
squint-eye ahau narrative scenes, in which role he is not yet fully understood.
" ~ 94. on his lower face and patches of jaguar pelt on his arms, legs and back. He will often wear a shell
on his forehead. He is the god of the number 9 and the other so-called Chicchan god in the
4-. Dresden Codex.
Hun Ahau God of the Number Nine
These twins are very active in Maya narrative scenes. They shoot blowguns; they carry the
GI Glll Headband Twins
GI JGU garments of the Maize God; they confront old gods and they play the ballgame. Flcuns 38
F I GUR E 3 5
progress (Fig. 39). They are the gods of writing, artists and artisans, and of calculations. They Kan-cross
are the original model for Hun»Batz and Hun»Chuen, the older, twin brothers of the Hero seven o
Twins, who are transformed into monkeys for tormenting their younger brothers." May o
These twins appear in several variant forms. First, both can be depicted as howler monkeys (glyph
for twenty)
with human bodies. In this incarnation, each has a shell beard, a deer ear and a tied cloth
ex headdress, usually in the form of a turban. This monkey version appears as the kin glyph for
"day" in Long Count dates. Second, both twins can appear as the "Printout God," a nickname
Fl cvn rs 4 2
inspired by the stream of bar»and-dot numbers on the tree that emerges from under the arm. persoruhcaiuon he'ad 7 Black-Kan God and Bolon Mayel
The Printout God is fully human (and quite handsome), although he wears the shell beard and
the same deer ear as the monkey. The twins are frequently depicted as one monkey and one
Printout God. OTHER GODS
FIGURE 39
The Paddlers The .lester God
These old gods (Fig. 40) are named for their appearance as the paddlers of the canoe of life found The ]ester God, named for the resemblance of his tri»pointed forehead to the cap of medieval
on the bones from Burial 116 at Tikal. As deities they have a particular association with period- court jesters, is an emblem of royalty rather than an actor (Fig. 43). The image is derived from
jaguar head 0
ending rites and are brought into physical existence through bloodletting rites held on these the zoomorphic personification head attached to a tri-pointed headband element that served as
4879'
days. In the Early Classic period, they appear in the mouth of the Vision Serpent; in the Late
Classic period, in the mouth of the Double»headed Serpent Bar, a scepter carried by rulers. They
the crown of Maya kings in the Late Preclassic period. The god can also be personified in
anthropomorphic form; in full»bodied form, it was held as a scepter. 8
s 4»
are also the miniature gods who float in blood scrolls in scenes of scattering rites. In glyphic tri»pointed cap
inscriptions, they are designated by their portrait heads or by the glyphs for night and day. Their
tri-pointed cap
QI
M
manifestation of this basic opposition is reflected by the presence of bright, mirror god markings
on one and dark markings on the other.
One Paddler, who has acquired the name of the Old Stingray Spine God, is characterized by a "L
93
" ~'@
Jester God from a
anthropomolphlc Jester God scepter
squintfeye and the presence of a lancet, either a stingray spine or bone awl, in the septum of his Drummaior Headdress
persomficanon
Péaddler nose. He can also wear a shark head as a hat. The other Paddler, the Old Jaguar God, wears a FIGURE 43
jaguar-head hat. Both have prominent Roman noses and the sunken mouths of toothless old The Jester God
FIGURE 40
men, and both wear string knots on their belts. Many of the other twins described here wear the
same knot. The Maize God
The Maize God is a handsome young man at the peak of his strength and beauty. Maize leaves
maze foliation
The Twins of the Sacrificial Dance and often an ear of corn spring from the top of his head (Fig. 44). In the Early Classic period, he
Chac-Xib-Chac and the Baby ]aguar, the Twins of the Sacrificial Dance, have been discussed was marked by a line-and-hook design on his cheek, and in this period the foliation often maize kernel maize plant
above as individuals (Fig. 41). While each can appear alone or paired with other actors, they emerges from the glyph for maize instead of from the god's head itself.
also have a special affinity to each other. On pottery they are actors in a sacrificial death dance,
in which Chac-Xib-Chac dances toward a reclining Baby ]guar. On the stele of Xultun, they The Death Gods
are displayed by kings as objects of power and authority. The Maya cosmos was populated by a plethora of death gods, each with its particular name and
attributes. The principal of these was designated God A (Fig. 45a). His face has skeletal fea»
I.
The Uc»Ek»Kan and Bolon»Mayel Pair tores, his limbs are thin and his body is marked by a bloated stomach associated with starvation
This pair appears only in glyphic or emblematic form, and to date they have not been identified and parasitical infestation. The Maize God
as actors. One emblem is composed of the number 7 and the glyphs for black and yellow; the Death God A' (Fig. 45b) has human features, but unlike God A, his body is well fleshed, not
Jaguar other has the number 9 and a rare glyph for the number 20, with footprints above it (Fig. 42).59 like that of a victim of starvation. His lower jaw is skeletal, and a black stripe is painted across FIGURE 44
These forms occur most often as objects or emblems in scenes on stone stele; ..i Early Classic
examples, however, one or the other can be held as an object by a ruler. Although their meaning
disembodied eye
FIGURE 41 is not yet understood, their most important usage is on top of lips to-lip cache vessels, special clml "death" sign
offering containers made from two large plates stacked together lip to lip.60
Ii
I
Death God A
Muan BIT(
The Old Gods
moan Teether heaooresb A set of toothless old gods, characterized by sunken lips and wrinkled faces seems to have
presided over Xibalba. The first. God L wears a Muan Bird headdress and has a jaguar ear (Fig
46). He can have either a human or a square eye. His is usually depicted sitting on a throne, and
he clearly reigns as a principal god of the Underworld
The second, God N or Pauahtun, has several forms." He emerges from or wears a shell
either that of a conch or a turtle (Fig. 47b). He can also appear in full-bodied form wearing a
section of shell as a pectoral, and a napkin or net headdress (Fig. 47a). His ear is often that of
reptiles or is depicted as a Kan cross with the number 7. In a third form, he is the earth bearer
wearing water»lilies a net headdress and cauac signs on his body_signs that combine to ind
Cate his name, Pauahtun (Fig. 47c). In a younger, more handsome form, he is Bacab. the sk
bearer (Fig. 47d). The Old Pauahtun also overlaps with the Monkey Scribes and seems to have
been the god of writing and of art
The third god, designated God D, has the glyphic name ltzamna (Fig. 48). Like the other
M uon Blrd
gods, he has an old man's face, but his eyes are always square with spiral pupils. His most
moan feather headdress distinctive feature headband extending beyond his forehead to a shield-shaped medallion
containing akbal, the glyph for "night and darkness symbol that is also part of his
wears a shell pectoral and a cut-shell ornament on his head. This god is the on
image from the Classic period that be tied through glyphs to the name Itzamna. the
called Lizard House of Maya religion. That concept, if it existed the Classic period at all
ci gare tle
not associated with this god, however
aczuaf ear
FIGURE 46
water-llly
Underworld as a place replete with disease and vile smells rather than as a condition of extreme
Death Gods FIGURE 48
hot or cold. One word for devil was seizin, which literally meant "fatter. " The foul odors expelled God D-Itzamna
F I GUR E 4 5 from the Xibalbans are visibly represented with foliated scrolls. Their jewelry is made not from The Moon Goddess
jade but from disembodied eyes taken from the dead and dying (Fig. 45d). Their special symbol The Moon Goddess is a young woman who sits in the crescent of the moon. She often holds a
is the percent sign (%) from the day sign Ami. rabbit (Fig. 49), whose shape can be seen in the gray patterns on the surface of the moon, the goddess
an Bird
especially when it is full. She is the personification of the number 1. The mothers of rulers at
The Old Gods Yaxchilan were sometimes set in moon signs, while the fathers were presented in sun signs. This moon sign
then headdress A set of toothless old gods, characterized by sunken lips and wrinkled faces, seems to have usage reveals a mythology that defined the moon as female and as the wife of the sun. rabbit
presided over Xibalba. The first, God L, wears a Muan Bird headdress and has a jaguar ear (Fig.
46). He can have either a human or a square eye. His is usually depicted sitting on a throne, and The Celestial Bird
he clearly reigns as a principal god of the Underworld. Many birds populate Maya cosmology. Chief among them is the supernatural Celestial Bird, also
The second, God N 1 7 Pauahtun, has several forms.62 He emerges from or wears a shell, called the Serpent Bird and the Principal Bird Deity (Fig. 50). This Bird has long feathers like
either that of a conch or a turtle (Fig. 47b). He can also appear in full»bodied form wearing a those of tropical birds, short legs with talons and a mirror device set at the base of his tail. His
section of shell as a pectoral, and a napkin or net headdress (Fig. 47a). His ear is often that of wing, which merges with a personification head, has led to the misnomer the Serpent Bird. His FIGURE 49
reptiles or is depicted as a Kan-cross with the number 7. In a third form, he is the earth bearer, head is zoomorphic with a squint-eye and a mirror forehead, and he wears the same shell pec- The Moon Goddess
wearing water-lilies, a net headdress and cauac signs on his body_signs that combine to indi- toral and head ornament as God D. His lower jaw is usually obscured by a disk that hangs from
cate his name, Pauahtun (Fig. 47c). In a younger, more handsome form, he is Bacab, the sky his mouth; it is marked by a triangle of dots and is hung with braided ribbons. This Bird resides
bearer (Fig. 47d). The Old Pauahtun also overlaps with the Monkey Scribes and seems to have at the top of the axis Mundi, the World Tree of Maya cosmology.
been the god of writing and of art.
The third god, designated God D, has the glyphic name Itzamna (Fig. 48). Like the other The Muan Bird
gods, he has an old man's face, but his eyes are always square with spiral pupils. His most The image of the Muan Bird is modeled on a horned owl (Fig. 51). His eyes are round and his
distinctive feature is a headband extending beyond his forehead to a shield-shaped medallion feathers tipped black. He is the Bird that sits in the headdress of God L. His name was Oxlahun-
containing akbal, the glyph for "night and darkness," a symbol that is also part of his name Chaan, or 13»Sky, and he is the personification of the katun and of the sky.
glyph. He wears a shell pectoral and a cut-shell ornament on his head. This god is the only
image from the Classic period that can be tied through glyphs to the name Itzamna, the so The Water Bird
called Lizard House of Maya religion. That concept, if it existed in the Classic period at all, was The Water Bird (Fig. 52) appears to symbolize the general class of aquatic birds that thrived
not associated with this god, however. along the canals, swamps and rivers of the Maya landscape. He has a crested head like that of a
heron, with short legs and a long neck. His beak is shaped like that of a cormorant, and he is
ear often represented holding a small fish. The Water Bird is associated especially with GI; his head
is the main sign of the Palenque Emblem Glyph.
personified wing
FIGURE 46
water~llly 13 Sky swollen beak
l
1, » tipped feather
MIYI'OY forehead
o=<pa...
God N with shell cauac-tun (
markings zoomorphic' head
/
v`¢=:>
MAYA GOD
THE BLOOD OF KINGS