Module 4 Taylor's Scientific Theory
Module 4 Taylor's Scientific Theory
Page 3 of 3
Paper: 10Paper Title:
PRINCIPLES & PRACTICES OF MANAGEMENT
Paper Coordinator: Prof. TejinderSharma,
Items Description of Module
Subject Name Management
Paper Name Principles and practices of management
Module Title Taylor’s Scientific Management
Module Id Module no.-4
Pre- Requisites Concept of Management, Elementary Quantitative Techniques
Objectives To study the scientific management given by Taylor
Keywords Scientific Management, Time Study, Motion Study, Lead Time
Table of Contents
1. Learning Outcomes
2. Historical background of Scientific Management
3. Definition and concept of Scientific Management
4. Purpose of Scientific Management
5. Features of Scientific Management
6. Principles of Scientific Management
7. Techniques of Scientific Management
8. Benefits of Scientific Management
9. Criticism of Scientific Management
10. Summary
11. Self- Assessment Questions
2.Harmony, Not Discord: In every organization there are two groups of people i.e. “workers‟ and
„management‟ and both always feel dissatisfied with each other. Workers always feel that they are
overburdened and are underpaid. Management always feels that workers are good for nothing and
are paid unnecessarily.
In this principle, Taylor emphasized that the interests of employers and employees do not clash. It
seeks to harmonize the objectives of both sides. Group harmony suggests that thre should be mutual
give and take situation and proper understanding so that group as a whole contributes to the
maximum.
Positive impacts of this principle:
i. Change of attitude of both groups towards each other.
ii. A cordial relationship can be developed between workers and management.
Iii. Goals of the organization can be easily achieved.
iv. Each activity can be done in a better manner.
v. Development of team spirit.
vi. High morale of employees.
Vii. Cooperation and coordination in the organization.
Example: Japanese work culture is a classic example of such a principle. In Japenese companies,
paternalistic style of management is in practice. There is complete openness between the
management and workers.
3. Cooperation, Not Individualism: Cooperation’ means acting jointly, or a union towards
achieving the same result. This principle states that the work should be done in cooperation and
with mutual confidence. Employees and management should co-operate with each other.
Competition should be replaced by cooperation.
Positive impacts of this principle:
i. Development of team spirit.
ii. High morale of employees.
Iii. Cooperation and coordination in the organization.
iv. Goals of the organization can be easily achieved.
4. Development of each and every person to his or her greatest efficiency and prosperity:
Scientific management provides that the right person be placed at the right job. Besides it provides
for the selection of persons to be made as per job requirements. It seeks to assess the physical,
psychological, educational requirements of a job and match them with the capabilities of
candidates.
Positive impacts of this principle:
i. Scientifically trained workers.
ii. Work satisfaction.
Iii. Understanding the nature of the job.
iv. Workers produce more and earn more.
5. Maximum output not restricted output: Maximum output means increased profits and reduced
costs. Scientific management involves continuous increase in production and productivity instead of
restricted production either by management or by workers. Taylor hated inefficiency and deliberate
curtailment of production.
Taylor has suggested the division of the work of factory manager into two sub departments:
(i) Planning department, and
(ii) Production department.
Four experts are appointed in each department. The experts in the planning department do planning
and the experts in the production department help in production.
C. Work Study: This is also called scientific study. Work study means an objective and systematic
observation of each step or operation of a work. Work study tries to minutely observe each process
and part thereof to decide if the work is performed in a systematic and scientific manner or not.
Following are the techniques of work study:
i). Method Study: Method study aims at minimizing the cost of production by using a better,
optimal mix of resources. It seeks to decide the best method of doing a job. It helps in reducing the
transportation, storage, handling cost of raw materials and goods.
ii) Motion Study: Motion study refers to the study of movements like lifting, putting objects,
sitting and changing positions etc. which are undertaken while doing a typical job. Unnecessary
movements are sought to be eliminated so that it takes less time to complete the job efficiently.
iii) Time Study: It determines the standard time taken to perform a well-defined job. Time
measuring devices are used for each element of task. The standard time is fixed for the whole of the
task by taking several readings. The method of time study will depend upon the volume and
frequency of the task, the cycle time of the operation and time measurement costs. The objective of
time study is to determine the number of workers to be employed, frame suitable incentive schemes
and determine labour costs.
iv) Fatigue Study: it is generally caused by long working hours. It emphasis on:
The frequency of rest intervals.
The duration of rest intervals
The number of rest intervals.
This study aims at providing proper rest interval to the employees to increase the effectiveness
of the work. Fatigue study seeks to determine the amount and frequency of rest intervals in
completing a task. For example, normally in a plant, work takes place in three shifts of 8 hours
each. Even in a single shift a worker has to be given some rest interval to take her/his lunch etc.
If the work involves heavy manual labour then small pauses have to be frequently given to the
worker so that she/he can recharge her/his energy level for optimum contribution.
D. Differential Piece Wage System: F.W. Taylor started this method as a part of the scheme of
scientific management. The underlying principle of this system is to reward an efficient worker and
penalize the inefficient person. In Taylor‟s system, inefficient persons have no place in his
organization.
The main features of this system are:
1. Minimum wages are not guaranteed in this plan.
2. A standard time fixed for taking completing the task.
3. Different rates are fixed for taking standard time or more.
4. Higher rate is given if work is completed in standard or less time and lower rate is offered if more
than standard time is taken.
For Example: It is determined that standard output per worker per day is 10 units and those who
made standard or more than standard will get Rs.50 per unit and those below will get Rs.40 per unit.
Now an efficient worker making 11 units will get 11×50=Rs.550 per day whereas a worker who
makes 9 units will get 9×40= Rs. 360 per day.
A. Benefits to Workers
1. Improved working conditions: Scientific management lays emphasis on improving actual
working conditions, e.g., ventilation, lighting, working space, work hours etc.
2. Better training: Scientific selection helps to improve the standard of training. Training is
designed to enable a person to suit the job requirements. It advocates scientific training for
employees.
3. Productivity linked wages: Differential piece rate means better wages for better performer.
The higher the performances the better are the wages. It helps the workers to improve their
efficiency.
4. Improved relations: Cooperation and mutual coordination helps better relations amongst
management and workers and also within workers.
B. Benefits to Society
1. Improved standard of living: Scientific management aims at higher profits which in turn
lead to better wages. The process in turn thus helps to improve the standard of living of
workers.
2. General economic prosperity: The mental revolution develops better coordination and
productivity. Profitability is also improved. Standard of living of worker is also improved. It
thus helps to improve general prosperity.
3. Economic prosperity: Industrial peace and welfare- cooperation, mutual trust, confidence
help in augmenting peace and welfare in industry.
4. Better education level: Adoption of scientific and systematic techniques makes workmen
aware and conscious of latest methods and techniques. This awareness helps to motivate
worker‟s inclination for formal education.
A. Grievances of workers:
i. Ignores human aspect: Workers strongly oppose scientific management as it completely ignores
human feelings, personnel relations, etc.
ii. Monotony:Standardized works, methods and techniques leave no scope for individual initiative.
This all add to monotony.
iii. Exploitation: Treating workmen as machines leads to exploitation of workers.
iv. Discourages trade union: Scientific methods discourage trade unions.
B. Grievances of Employees:
i. Cost: Application of scientific methods involve cost to an organization. All organizations may
not be prepared for this extra cost.
ii. Flexibility: Scientific methods are least flexible and assume that these are the only best ways to
perform.
C. Grievances of Public:
i. Disregards human beings: Treatment of human beings as economic being is the highest
criticism of scientific management.
ii. Treating, planning and implementation as distinct function is one of the limitations of scientific
management ignoring the interrelation and interdependence of these two vital managerial functions.
iii. No “one best way” the concept of “one best way” is not universally applicable. One ways which
is regarded as best in one situation may not fit in other situation.
10.0 Summary
The Principles of Taylor's Scientific Management Theory became widely practiced, and the
resulting cooperation between workers and managers eventually developed into the teamwork we
enjoy today. While Taylorism in a pure sense isn't practiced much today, scientific management did
provide many significant contributions to the advancement of management practice. It introduced
systematic selection and training procedures, it provided a way to study workplace efficiency, and it
encouraged the idea of systematic organizational design.