Thinning Control Hand Book
Thinning Control Hand Book
Thinning control
Thinning control
Key to procedures
Determine the yield class of the stand
(page 4)
Continue marking
making only
occasional checks
Field Guide
Thinning control
You may re-use this information (not including logos or material that is copyright of
a third party) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open
Government Licence. To view this licence, visit: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/
open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team at: The
National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk.
First published by the Forestry Commission as Booklet 17 in 1967. Second edition
published as Booklet 32 in 1971. Third edition published as Booklet 54 in 1985.
reprinted as Field Book 2 in 1988 and 1999. This revised fourth edition published
by the Forestry Commission in 2015.
ISBN: 978-0-85538-930-7
Forestry commission (2015).
Thinning Control
Forestry Commission, Edinburgh. i–iv + 1–56pp.
Keywords: forestry, forest management, silviculture, thinning
FCFG004/FC-GB( JW)/MLG-1.5K/OCT15
The Forestry Commission will consider all requests to make the content of
publications available in alternative formats. Please send any such requests
to diversity@forestry.gsi.gov.uk or call 0300 067 5046.
ii
Contents
Introduction 1
Yield class 3.
The concept of yield class 4.
Assessing general yield class 5
Thinning practice 7
Thinning type 8.
Thinning intensity 9.
Thinning cycle 9.
Thinning yield 10.
Timing of thinning 15
Control of thinning 19
Field procedures 21
Measuring top height 22.
Measuring basal area 22.
Measuring the volume marked 28.
Calculating mean diameter 29
iii
thinning control
iv
Introduction
Thinning in forestry is the selective removal of a proportion of trees growing in a
forest in order to provide more growing space for the remaining trees. The usual aim
is to increase the total yield of usable timber over the lifetime of a stand of trees and
to provide an intermediate supply of timber. However, thinning may also be carried
out for other reasons, for example to increase biodiversity or to improve the
resilience of trees to environmental stresses or outbreaks of pests or diseases.
If a stand of trees is to be thinned, there are choices to be made on the age of first
thinning, the type of thinning, the intensity of thinning, the thinning cycle, the
thinning yield, and the age at which thinning should cease. These choices will depend
on such factors as management objectives, timber markets available at the time and
likely to be available in the future, the quality of the stand, its liability to wind damage
and the cost of harvesting the timber.
The main objectives of thinning control are usually to combine maximum timber
yield in the long term with the maintenance of a regular supply of material from
thinnings. Failure to control the volume removed as thinnings can result in over
cutting which leads to a loss in volume production, or under cutting which depresses
profitability. Such failure to control the thinning may also produce an erratic supply of
timber to the market.
The precision of control will depend upon the expertise and resources available, as
well as the nature of the tree stand being thinned. Normally it should be possible to
control yields to within 15% of the target thinning yield, but achieving this degree of
control may be expensive in mixtures or stands that are very variable in other ways.
Note that effective thinning practice depends upon the appropriate application of the
guidance under a wide range of conditions. For example, it may pay to thin an
understocked stand because of contractual commitments, despite the loss of
increment that is likely to result.
This Field Guide provides guidance on the control of volume to be removed when
marking a thinning and a guide to thinning yields. There are four main sections: the
first describes the yield class system and how yield class is assessed in a stand. The
second covers thinning practice, including the type, intensity and cycle of thinning,
how to calculate the thinning yield, the timing of thinning, and how the thinning is
controlled. The third describes the field procedures for estimating top height, basal
area and volume marked, and how to calculate mean diameter. The final section
presents general yield class curves for a selection of common species. A summary of
the office and field procedures to be followed when marking a thinning is printed on
the inside front cover.
1
thinning control
2
Yield class
Yield class
thinning control
In an even-aged stand the cumulative volume production, including dead trees and
thinnings, divided by the age of the stand is referred to as the mean annual increment
(MAI). After planting, MAI increases during the early years of vigorous growth, reaches
a maximum, and then declines with increasing age. The point at which the MAI curve
reaches a maximum is the maximum average rate of volume increment which a
particular stand can achieve, and this indicates the yield class. For example, a stand
with a maximum MAI of 14 cubic metres per hectare has a yield class of 14.
4
Yield class
Yield class obtained through top height and age of the stand alone is termed General
Yield Class (GYC). Yield class obtained from some measure or prediction of the actual
mean annual volume increment of the stand is termed Local Yield Class (LYC). Where
LYC is known, it should be used in preference to GYC for thinning control. (see the
booklet accompanying Forest Yield: a pc-based yield model for forest management in
Britain for further information).
Where there is more than one species in the stand, the GYC of each species should
be assessed separately. It may be necessary to increase the number of sample plots
to estimate top height so that the minimum number of top height trees is measured
in each species. The average yield class of the stand can be obtained by averaging the
component yield classes according to the proportion of the canopy each occupies.
For example, if one species occupies 40% of the canopy and has a GYC of 10, while
a second species of GYC 14 occupies 60% of the canopy, the average GYC is:
(10 x 40 + 14 × 60)
= 12.4 (which rounds to 12)
100
Uneven-aged stands are treated in a similar way in that the yield class of each
component is assessed separately, and the average yield class again obtained,
weighted according to the proportion of the canopy occupied by each component.
When, for any reason, the rate of height growth has changed appreciably in the life
of the stand (e.g. because it has been in check, or because it has been fertilised), an
adjusted age should be used instead of the actual age. Further information on yield
class assessment is given in the booklet accompanying Forest Yield: a pc-based yield
model for forest management in Britain.
5
thinning control
6
Thinning practice
Thinning practice
thinning control
Thinning type
Thinnings may be either selective or systematic.
Selective thinning
In low thinning, trees are removed predominantly from the lower canopy, i.e. the
suppressed and sub-dominant trees. Low thinning tends to result in relatively dense
stands of evenly distributed trees. In crown thinning trees are removed
predominantly from the upper canopy, i.e. some dominants and co-dominants,
with the aim of giving selected trees freedom to grow rapidly. Some trees may also
be removed from the lower canopy. Crown thinnings are often used at the first and
second thinnings, especially for shade-tolerant trees, to increase the average size of
trees being removed as thinnings, and to encourage the growth of the remaining trees
where very large trees are more valuable. However, a true crown thinning cannot be
maintained throughout a rotation, because too few competing trees remain to give
a reasonable thinning yield. Over a rotation, the distinction between low and crown
thinnings tends to become academic. For example, even if a low thinning is used,
some thinning in the upper canopy is usually inevitable in order to release the better
dominant trees, which will ultimately form the main crop of the stand. A stand could
be thinned by removing the dominant trees, but this would result in a considerable
reduction in total volume production over the rotation.
Systematic thinning
Systematic thinnings are usually one of the varieties of line thinning such as row
thinning, strip thinning, chevron thinning, or some combination of these, and are
commonly used for the first, and sometimes the second, thinning. Systematic thinning
is usually cheaper and easier to manage than selective thinning, but the operation
may leave parts of the crop unthinned and may result in losses of volume production
8
Thinning practice
and reduced stand stability. Systematic thinning should only be considered where the
saving in cost is greater than the likely loss of future revenue.
Thinning intensity
The thinning intensity is the rate at which volume is removed, e.g. 10 m3 per hectare
per year. It should not be confused with the thinning yield which is the actual volume
removed in any one thinning.
Over a wide range of thinning intensities the cumulative volume production of usable
timber is unaffected. At low intensities, stands will be overstocked, unless the initial
plant spacing is very wide, and the cumulative production of usable timber is reduced
because some trees die before they are harvested. At high intensities, stands do not
fully utilise the growing space created by the thinnings, so that cumulative production
is reduced. The maximum thinning intensity which can be maintained without
causing a loss of cumulative volume production is known as the marginal thinning
intensity. For most species this critical intensity, assessed from the time the stand has
reached the threshold basal area (see page 17) up to the time of maximum mean
annual volume increment, (see pages 37–56), is about 70% of the maximum mean
annual volume increment per year (i.e. 70% of the yield class is removed each year).
Thus, the marginal thinning intensity of a stand of yield class 20 is 14 m3 per hectare
per year (70% of 20).
The choice of thinning intensity depends on the location of the stand, the markets
available, and the objectives of the owner. Higher intensities will be reflected in
greater increases in mean diameter of the main-crop trees. In addition, the greater
thinning yields resulting from higher intensities provide greater revenues. Taken
together, these features tend to make higher thinning intensities more profitable,
although the reduced volume of the final crop has to be taken into account. The
marginal thinning intensity is often chosen as it produces high thinning yields without
reducing the total volume production over the rotation, but there are circumstances
when it will not be the best choice. For example, if thinnings are difficult to sell,
thinning may not be carried out, or a lower thinning intensity may be adopted. If
large sized trees are required as soon as possible, a higher thinning intensity may
be adopted even though total volume production will be reduced.
Thinning cycle
The thinning cycle is the interval in years between successive thinnings.
For the purpose of determining the thinning yield (defined below), the cycle is the
number of years before the next thinning, not the number of years since the last
9
thinning control
thinning which has little relevance to future growth. The cycle has an influence on
profitability as the value per cubic metre of any single thinning depends in part on the
scale of the operation. Long cycles involve heavier single thinnings which are usually
more profitable, but may increase the risk of windthrow owing to an opening up of
the canopy. In extreme cases they may result in some loss of volume production. The
choice of thinning cycle will usually depend on local management considerations and
on the yield class of the crop. The usual length of thinning cycle is from 4–6 years in
young or fast growing crops, and about 10 years in older or slower growing crops.
Thinning yield
The thinning yield is the actual volume removed in any one thinning. If a fully stocked
stand is thinned at the marginal thinning intensity, the thinning yield will be 70% of
the maximum mean annual increment (i.e. 70% of the yield class) multiplied by the
cycle. For example, the thinning yield for a stand of yield class 14 being thinned at the
marginal thinning intensity on a 5-year cycle is:
If the marginal thinning intensity has been chosen, the normal thinning yield can be
read from Table 2 according to the yield class and thinning cycle.
These thinning yields can be taken from the time that the threshold basal area is
reached up until the time of maximum mean annual increment, which is indicated on
the top height/age curves (pages 37–56).
If the marginal thinning intensity has not been chosen, the actual thinning intensity
can be used to calculate the thinning yield. For example, the yield from a stand of
yield class 14, being thinned at an intensity of 80% of the marginal thinning intensity
on a 5 year cycle is:
In all cases, the thinning yield should not be so heavy that it opens up the stand to the
risk of windthrow, or to invasion by other woody species, and thinning should not
take all the dominant and good quality trees so that none are left to form a
reasonable crop after thinning.
10
Thinning practice
The thinning yields in this Guide refer to fully stocked areas. The gross area which
includes roads, rides, or other non-productive land should be reduced to a net area
which excludes such land, before the volume per hectare is calculated for the
purposes of thinning control. The training and supervision of markers is easier if
estimates of the volume marked per net hectare are made. For example, extraction
racks should not be included in the area being marked, as the thinning yield should
be controlled in the productive area between the racks. When the racks themselves
are marked it will usually be easiest to control the volume marked in the normal way
between the racks, and to estimate the total volume removed by adding on the extra
volume removed from the racks.
11
thinning control
Understocked stands
The normal thinning yields are intended for use with fully stocked stands, so some
reduction in yield will be necessary for stands which are understocked, perhaps
caused by over-thinning in the past. However, it will usually be more practical to
leave such stands until they have reached full stocking again (see ‘Timing of thinning’
on page 16). If it is decided to thin an understocked stand, recovery of full stocking
will be delayed much less if the thinning yield is reduced by at least one year’s cut.
For example, it may be best to take a 3-year cut even if it is proposed to thin again
in 4 years’ time.
Overstocked stands
In stands which are overstocked, perhaps because of a lack of thinning in the past,
or a delay in the time of first thinning, the thinning yield can be increased to reduce
the stocking level. For example, a 6-year cut may be taken even if it is proposed to
thin again in 5 years’ time. If the stand is still overstocked at the next thinning, the
procedure may be repeated so as to achieve a controlled reduction in stocking.
Where there is a choice, short rather than long cycles should be used when thinning
overstocked stands. This is particularly relevant where there is a risk of windthrow.
Species mixtures
The thinning yield from stands with mixtures of species should be determined in
the same way as for stands of single species, except that a ‘weighted mean’ yield class
should be used, i.e. weighting each species according to the percentage of the canopy
of the stand that it is expected to occupy after the thinning. For example, if the stand
after thinning is expected to be 75% Sitka spruce – yield class 16, and 25% Lodgepole
pine – yield class 8, then the thinning yield at the marginal thinning intensity on a
5-year cycle is:
12
Thinning practice
Uneven-aged stands
In two storey single-species stands, the thinning yield should be calculated in the
normal way using the weighted mean yield class of both the components. However,
in all-aged stands the whole of the maximum mean annual increment can be
removed each year. For example, if the yield class is 12, then on a 5-year cycle each
‘thinning’ yield would be 12 × 5 = 60 m3 per hectare. The yield will consist of trees
of all ages and all sizes, and the largest trees will be of, or past, rotation age.
Diseased stands
In diseased stands, the thinning yield may have to be reduced or thinning may be
suspended altogether. The correct treatment will depend on the nature and extent
of the disease.
When parts of a stand are ready for thinning, but others are not, thinning will usually
only be started when the thinnable parts are large enough for economic working.
Usually, the full thinning yield will be taken from fully stocked parts of the stand, while
the other areas may be left unthinned. For example, if a stand is only 65% fully
stocked, then only 65% of the thinning yield will be available.
Line thinning
In selective thinnings, the thinning intensity is usually controlled by fixing the thinning
cycle and adjusting the thinning yield. However, in line thinnings, it is not always
practicable to make precise adjustments to the thinning yield. For example, the
harvesting method may reduce the options for varying the thinning yield, if maximum
efficiency of harvesting is to be achieved. Therefore in line thinnings it is usually more
convenient to control the thinning intensity by adjusting the thinning cycle.
If there are overriding management reasons why the thinning cycle cannot be
adjusted, then the scope for modifying the thinning yield, given a fixed cycle, is
restricted in the case of row thinnings. For example, if it is desired to thin by removing
single rows, then the options are: removal of every fourth row (25%), every third row
(33%) or every second row (50%). In chevron patterns of thinning the possibilities of
adjusting the thinning yield are greater. Examples of two common situations are given
below. They show the various steps required to derive an appropriate thinning
pattern for a fixed cycle. A worked example is included in brackets after each step.
Row thinning
13
thinning control
6. Estimate the volume per hectare before thinning (150 m3 per hectare).
7. Express the thinning yield as a percentage of the estimated volume per hectare
before thinning.
67.2
× 100 = 44.8%
150
8. Choose a row removal pattern appropriate to this thinning percentage. (In this
example, the nearest equivalent for a single row removal pattern would be to
remove every second row (50%).)
9. If the percentage resulting from the chosen row removal pattern is greater or less
than the required percentage, the thinning cycle should be altered, or the thinning
yield at the next thinning should be reduced or increased, or the removal pattern
reconsidered. (In this example, the removal of every second row would cause some
loss of increment and it would be necessary to extend the thinning cycle by about 2
years. Alternative approaches would be to take a smaller cut after the planned cycle
of 6 years, or to remove every third row on a 5 year cycle.)
Chevron thinning
8. Choose the spacing between main racks, and the number of rows to be removed
(every 20th row removed) to create main racks.
9. Deduct the volume percentage removed by creating the main racks (1 in 20 = 5%)
from the target percentage (44.8 – 5 = 39.8%). Note that if the main racks are not
parallel to the rows, the percentage removed is in effect the mean rack width
expressed as a percentage of the distance between racks.
14
Thinning practice
10. The remaining volume must be removed from the side racks. As the remaining
fully stocked portion of the stand is less than the total area (in this example 95%),
then the proportion of the remaining growing stock to be removed is:
39.8
× 100 = 41.9%
95
11. The thinning yield is controlled through varying the side rack width, the angle of
the side rack to the main racks, or the distance between the side racks, so that the
required percentage of the fully stocked area is removed. Given two of these
factors, the third can be found as follows:
f p p
d = r × r = d × f=d×
p f r
f is a factor which varies according to the angle of the side rack with the
main rack:
For example, if the mean rack width is 2 m, and the angle between main
and side racks is 40°, then the distance between side racks is:
156
2× = 7.45 m
41.9
A line-thinned stand may take longer to reach the basal area required before
a further thinning is justified than would be the case with a selective thinning.
Timing of thinning
A stand will not normally be thinned unless it is fully stocked. This may be judged by
visual inspection or, more objectively, by using the following procedure:
15
thinning control
For conifers
3. Compare the basal area with the threshold basal area given in Table 3.
For broadleaves
4. Compare the basal area with the threshold basal area given in Table 3.
If the basal area is equal to, or greater than, the value in the table, the stand is fully
stocked and therefore ready for thinning. If the basal area is less than the value in the
table, the stand is not fully stocked. If however, it is still intended to thin the stand,
then the thinning yield should be reduced to compensate, or the thinning cycle
should be extended to allow the stand time to recover.
If the thinning yield is more than 60 m3 per hectare, the threshold basal area in
Table 3 should be increased before comparing it with the actual basal area. If the
thinning yield is between 60 and 80 m3 per hectare, increase the Table value by 10%.
If it is over 80 m3 per hectare, increase the Table value by 20%.
The time of first thinning will vary depending on the species, yield class and initial
spacing of the stand, the thinning intensity, the yield of the first thinning, and
harvesting and marketing considerations.
The earliest age at which thinning can take place without losing cumulative volume
production is known as the standard thinning age. This is not necessarily the
recommended first thinning age and there may be good reasons for starting thinning
at other ages.
The standard thinning age is later in more widely spaced stands and also for a heavy
first thinning, as otherwise the stocking will be reduced to a level which would cause
a loss of cumulative volume production. There are many circumstances where the
most profitable treatment will be to begin thinning later than the standard thinning
16
Thinning practice
Table 3 Threshold basal areas for fully stocked stands (square metres per hectare).
Species Yield Top height (metres)
class 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Scots pine 26 26 27 30 32 35 38 40 43 46
Corsican pine 34 34 33 33 33 34 35 36 37 39
Lodgepole pine 33 31 31 30 30 31 31 32 33 34
Sitka spruce 33 34 34 35 35 36 37 38 39 40 42
Norway spruce 33 33 34 35 36 38 40 42 44 46 49
European larch 23 22 22 22 23 24 25 27 28 30
Japanese and 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 27 28 29
hybrid larch
Douglas fir 28 28 28 29 30 31 32 34 35 37 40
Western hemlock 32 34 35 36 36 36 37 38 38 39 40
Red cedar 49 50 51 53 55 57 60 63 66 70
Grand fir 39 39 39 39 39 39 40 41 43 45
Noble fir 45 46 46 47 48 49 51 52 54
Oak 4 24 24 23 23 24 24
6 26 25 24 24 25 25 25 25
8 27 25 24 24 24 25 26 26 26
Beech and 4 22 23 25 27 30
sweet chestnut 6 24 25 25 27 29 31 33 36
8 — 27 27 27 28 29 31 33 35 37
10 — 28 28 27 27 28 29 31 33 35
Sycamore, ash, 4 17 17 18 21
birch and alder 6 17 18 19 22 25
8 17 18 20 22 25 28
10 18 19 20 23 26 30 33
12 19 20 21 24 27 31 35
age, notably where the standing value of the trees in such a thinning is low. If the
first thinning is delayed, it will need to be heavier, i.e. give a higher thinning yield,
so that the stand returns to the correct growing stock level, consistent with that for
the standard thinning age. It may not be possible to do this in one operation if the
thinning has been considerably delayed, as this could lead to loss of volume
production or stand instability. Subsequent thinnings will also need to be heavier
than normal to compensate. Delaying the first thinning is unlikely to cause any
reduction in cumulative production of usable timber unless the thinning is delayed
so long that trees start dying, but it will affect the mean diameter of the trees. The
standard thinning age for a wide range of species, yield classes and initial planting
spacings is given in Table 4.
17
thinning control
18
Thinning practice
Control of thinning
Thinning can be controlled in terms of the number of trees, the basal area, or
the volume, either remaining after thinning, or removed in the thinning. In many
situations, control of thinning based on a target for the basal area or volume to
be removed is preferable, because:
• It is easier to do.
• It tends to produce a constant and predictable yield of timber which is useful
for planning purposes.
It is important to note that thinning control based on a simplistic target for the
number of trees (either removed or left standing) is not recommended, because
the outcome, and therefore the target that needs to be set for the thinning, is very
dependent on the thinning type. For example, if a specified number of the smallest
trees in a stand are removed during a thinning, then the (larger) trees left standing
will still occupy much of the available canopy, so the effect on growing space will be
limited. On the other hand, if the same number of larger trees is removed, this may
leave large holes in the canopy. It is, therefore, difficult to specify simple and generally
applicable targets for thinning over the rotations of stands of trees, expressed in terms
of numbers of trees.
19
thinning control
20
Field procedures
Field procedures
thinning control
1. Select points at random throughout the stand. The number of points is equal to the
desired number of top height trees from Table 5, based on the area of the stand.
2. Measure the height of the tree with the largest dbh within a radius of 5.6 m from
each point. If there are no trees within 5.6 m of a point then a new point should
be selected at random.
3. Take the average of the heights measured to give an estimate of the top height of
the stand.
Using a relascope
Choose the number of sample points, using Table 6 as a rough guide. Select this
number of points, preferably systematically or with a point sampling grid on the map,
throughout the area being assessed. Each point should be at least the minimum
distance from the edge of the area given in Table 7.
22
Field procedures
Table 7 Minimum distances (in metres) of sample points from edge of stand.
Maximum likely dbh Minimum distance from edge of stand (m)
of trees (cm)
Relascope factor 2 Relascope factor 0.5
20 7 14
30 11 21
40 14 28
50 18 35
60 21 42
70 25 49
80 28 56
At each point, make a 360° sweep with the relascope, and record the number of trees
counted. Only trees with a dbh of at least 7 cm should be counted. If an estimate of
the basal area of only part of the stand is required, e.g. marked trees, then only these
trees should be counted. Note that accurate use of a relascope requires practice.
If the sampling point is on sloping ground, multiply the count by the correction factor
to the angle of the slope, as given in Table 8.
Work out the average count, and multiply this by the relascope factor. The result is the
estimated average basal area per hectare of the stand.
In stands with a regular pattern of variation, notably line mixtures, the sample points
should not be chosen at random, but chosen so that they give equal weighting to
each component. For example, in 3-row broadleaf : 3-row conifer mixtures, all the
23
thinning control
sample points should be midway between a row of conifers and a row of broadleaves.
In more complex line mixtures it is advisable to place equal numbers of sample points
between each pair of lines.
Choose a plot size which includes 7–20 measurable trees. use rectangular plots where
the planting rows are still clearly visible, and circular plots in all other stands. Tables 9
and 10 give the dimensions of a range of plots.
24
Field procedures
Table 10 Rectangular plot sizes in plantations where rows are clearly visible.
Average 3 rows wide 4 rows 6 rows 9 rows
spacing wide wide wide
between
Distance in metres along the row to give plot area (ha)
rows (m)
0.005 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.10
1.5 11.1 22.2 33.3 55.6 74.1
1.6 10.4 20.8 31.2 52.1 69.4
1.7 9.8 19.6 29.4 49.0 65.4
1.8 9.3 18.5 27.8 46.3 61.7
1.9 8.8 17.5 26.3 43.9 58.5
2.0 8.3 16.7 25.0 41.7 55.6
2.1 7.9 15.9 23.8 39.7 52.9
2.2 7.6 15.2 22.7 37.9 50.5
2.3 7.2 14.5 21.7 36.2 48.3
2.4 6.9 13.9 20.8 34.7 46.3
2.5 6.7 13.3 20.0 33.3 44.4
2.6 6.4 12.8 19.2 32.1 42.7
2.7 6.2 12.3 18.5 30.9 41.2
2.8 6.0 11.9 17.9 29.8 39.7
2.9 5.7 11.5 17.2 28.7 38.3
Note: Doubling the number of rows doubles the plot area, and similarly halving the distance
halves the plot area.
Lay out plots throughout the stand. Table 11 gives a guide to the number needed.
Plots should be laid out with care. The centre point of each circular plot must be
chosen at random. The location of rectangular plots must also be chosen at random,
but two of the sides of each plot must be parallel to the rows, and both must be
25
thinning control
midway between two adjacent rows. The boundary of each plot must be at least 5 m
from the edge of the stand. Where stands have been chosen subject to line thinning
that has left large gaps in the canopy that will not close by the time of next thinning,
the felled lines should be regarded as open ground and should not form part of a
plot. However, plot boundaries can be less than 5 m from felled lines within the stand.
The dimensions of the plots should be measured horizontally. If this is not possible on
sloping ground, multiply the dimension given in Table 9 or 10 by the correction factor
from Table 8. Use this corrected dimension for measuring directly up or down the slope.
0.5–2 6 8
2–10 8 12
Over 10 10 16
Measure the dbh of all the trees in the plot, and record the number of trees in each
dbh class of 7 cm or more.
Use Table 12 to find the basal area appropriate to each dbh class, and multiply by the
number of trees in each dbh class to give the total basal area in each class.
Add all these basal areas together and divide by the number of plots, to give an
average basal area per plot.
Divide the average basal area per plot by the individual plot area to give the
estimated average basal area per hectare of the stand.
26
Field procedures
27
thinning control
To estimate the volume per hectare which is being marked it is necessary to take
sample measurements. This is achieved either by using a relascope to estimate basal
area which is converted to volume using an estimated form height, or by measuring
the basal area of thinnings which fall within sample plots of known area, and
converting to volume using an estimated tariff number. These two procedures are
described below:
Using a relascope
2. Estimate the form height of the stand using the top height to form height tables
on pages 31–33 (Table 13).
4. At each point, do a 360° sweep with the relascope, and record the number of
marked trees counted. Only trees with a dbh of at least 7cm should be counted.
If the point is on sloping ground, multiply the count by the secant of the angle of
slope, from Table 8 on page 24.
5. Work out the average count, and multiply this by the relascope factor. The result
is the average basal area marked per hectare.
6. Multiply by the form height to give the estimated volume marked per hectare.
2. Estimate the tariff number of the stand using the top height/tariff number tables on
pages 34–35 (Table 14). Add 1 if a crown or systematic thinning has been marked.
3. Select two random plots of the same size which contain between 7–20 marked
trees (see page 25). Measure the dbh of all the marked trees of 7cm or more in
the plots, and calculate the mean dbh (see pages 29–30).
28
Field procedures
4. Use the estimated tariff number and mean dbh to derive an estimate of mean
volume. This can be done in any one of three ways:
• Refer to the tariff number alignment chart printed on the inside back cover
of this guide.
5. Work out the average number of marked trees in these two plots, and divide
by the plot area to give the estimated number of marked trees per hectare.
6. Multiply the mean volume by the number of marked trees per hectare to give
the estimated volume marked per hectare.
the stand is being line thinned, it may be simpler to estimate the volume per
If
hectare of the stand before thinning, and to calculate the volume removed as a
percentage of that volume. The volume per hectare should be estimated using either
of the above procedures, but measuring all trees in the plots instead of only the
marked trees. For example, if one row in four is being removed, and the volume
before thinning is 128 m3 per hectare, the thinning yield will be:
128
= 32 m3 per hectare
4
The ultimate objective is for the marker to be able to mark the correct thinning yield
without needing to use the above procedures, except when a new crop type is
encountered. Even so, it is recommended that occasional checks should be made to
confirm the accuracy of marking. If checks show that the thinning yield has not been
marked correctly, it is usually simpler to correct the over- or under-stocking at the
next thinning than to mark the stand again.
29
thinning control
4. Calculate the square root of this value to give the mean dbh.
30
Field procedures
31
thinning control
Table 13 Thinning form height (m) based on top height (continued).
Top Species
height
(m) DF WH RC LC GF NF OMS
8.0 2.22 2.90 2.35 1.47 2.21 3.16 2.78
8.5 2.43 3.13 2.56 1.90 2.46 3.37 3.07
9.0 2.64 3.36 2.77 2.34 2.70 3.58 3.36
9.5 2.85 3.59 2.97 2.76 2.95 3.79 3.65
10.0 3.06 3.82 3.18 3.18 3.20 4.00 3.94
10.5 3.28 4.06 3.39 3.60 3.44 4.21 4.23
11.0 3.49 4.29 3.59 4.01 3.69 4.42 4.52
11.5 3.70 4.52 3.80 4.41 3.94 4.63 4.81
12.0 3.91 4.75 4.01 4.81 4.18 4.84 5.10
12.5 4.12 4.99 4.21 5.20 4.43 5.04 5.39
13.0 4.33 5.22 4.42 5.59 4.67 5.25 5.68
13.5 4.54 5.45 4.63 5.97 4.92 5.46 5.97
14.0 4.75 5.68 4.83 6.34 5.17 5.67 6.26
14.5 4.96 5.91 5.04 6.71 5.41 5.88 6.55
15.0 5.18 6.15 5.25 7.08 5.66 6.09 6.84
15.5 5.39 6.38 5.45 7.43 5.91 6.30 7.13
16.0 5.60 6.61 5.66 7.79 6.15 6.51 7.42
16.5 5.81 6.84 5.87 8.13 6.40 6.72 7.71
17.0 6.02 7.07 6.07 8.47 6.65 6.93 8.00
17.5 6.23 7.31 6.28 8.81 6.89 7.14 8.29
18.0 6.44 7.54 6.49 9.14 7.14 7.35 8.58
18.5 6.65 7.77 6.69 9.46 7.38 7.55 8.87
19.0 6.86 8.00 6.90 9.78 7.63 7.76 9.16
19.5 7.07 8.24 7.11 10.09 7.88 7.97 9.45
20.0 7.29 8.47 7.31 10.40 8.12 8.18 9.74
20.5 7.50 8.70 7.52 10.70 8.37 8.39 10.03
21.0 7.71 8.93 7.73 10.99 8.62 8.60 10.32
21.5 7.92 9.16 7.93 11.28 8.86 8.81 10.61
22.0 8.13 9.40 8.14 11.56 9.11 9.02 10.90
22.5 8.34 9.63 8.35 11.84 9.36 9.23 11.19
23.0 8.55 9.86 8.55 12.11 9.60 9.44 11.48
23.5 8.76 10.09 8.76 12.38 9.85 9.65 11.77
24.0 8.97 10.33 8.97 12.64 10.10 9.85 12.06
24.5 9.19 10.56 9.17 12.89 10.34 10.06 12.35
25.0 9.40 10.79 9.38 13.14 10.59 10.27 12.64
32
Field procedures
Table 13 Thinning form height (m) based on top height (continued).
Top Species
height
(m) Oak Beech and Sycamore, ash, birch
sweet chestnut and alder
8.0 1.00 1.04 0.50
8.5 1.28 1.36 0.85
9.0 1.56 1.72 1.24
9.5 1.85 2.05 1.63
10.0 2.13 2.40 2.00
10.5 2.41 2.70 2.38
11.0 2.70 3.00 2.76
11.5 3.00 3.26 3.13
12.0 3.28 3.52 3.50
12.5 3.55 3.78 3.83
13.0 3.84 4.04 4.16
13.5 4.12 4.30 4.48
14.0 4.41 4.56 4.80
14.5 4.70 4.82 5.10
15.0 4.98 5.08 5.40
15.5 5.26 5.31 5.69
16.0 5.53 5.54 5.98
16.5 5.86 5.82 6.26
17.0 6.19 6.02 6.50
17.5 6.50 6.26 6.75
18.0 6.82 6.50 7.00
18.5 7.13 6.75 7.24
19.0 7.44 7.00 7.48
19.5 7.76 7.21 7.69
20.0 8.07 7.42 7.90
20.5 8.37 7.65 8.12
21.0 8.67 7.88 8.34
21.5 8.94 8.09 8.53
22.0 9.21 8.30 8.72
22.5 9.47 8.52 8.94
23.0 9.73 8.74 9.17
23.5 9.96 8.95 9.33
24.0 10.19 9.16 9.49
24.5 10.42 9.37 9.64
25.0 10.65 9.58 9.79
33
thinning control
34
Field procedures
35
thinning control
36
General yield class curves
38
general Yield class curves
Scots pine
35
Age of maximum 14
mean annual
volume increment
30 12
10
25 8
20
Top height (metres)
15
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Age (years)
39
thinning control
Corsican pine
40
20
18
35
16
Age of maximum
mean annual
volume increment 14
30
12
10
25
8
Top height (metres)
20 6
15
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Age (years)
40
general Yield class curves
Lodgepole pine
50
45
14
40 12
10
35
Age of maximum
mean annual
volume increment 8
30
Top height (metres)
6
25
4
20
15
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Age (years)
41
thinning control
Sitka spruce
50
45 24
22
20
40
18
Age of maximum
16
mean annual
35
volume increment
14
12
30
Top height (metres)
10
25 8
6
20
15
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Age (years)
42
general Yield class curves
Norway spruce
45
22
20
40
18
Age of maximum 16
mean annual
35 volume increment
14
12
30
10
Top height (metres)
8
25
20
15
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Age (years)
43
thinning control
European larch
35
12
30 10
Age of maximum
mean annual
volume increment
8
25
20
Top height (metres)
15
10
44
general Yield class curves
14
35
12
30 10
Age of maximum
mean annual
8
volume increment
25
Top height (metres)
20
15
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Age (years)
45
thinning control
Douglas fir
50
45 24
Age of maximum 22
mean annual 20
volume increment
40 18
16
14
35
12
10
30
Top height (metres)
25
20
15
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Age (years)
46
general Yield class curves
Western hemlock
50
45 24
22
40 20
Age of maximum 18
mean annual
volume increment 16
35
14
12
30
Top height (metres)
25
20
15
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Age (years)
47
thinning control
24
40
22
20
35 18
16
Age of maximum
mean annual
volume increment 14
30
12
Top height (metres)
25
20
15
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Age (years)
48
general Yield class curves
Grand fir
50
30
28
45
Age of maximum 26
mean annual
volume increment 24
40 22
20
18
35
16
14
30
12
Top height (metres)
25
20
15
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Age (years)
49
thinning control
Noble fir
45
40 22
20
Age of maximum 18
35
mean annual
volume increment 16
14
30
12
10
Top height (metres)
25
20
15
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Age (years)
50
general Yield class curves
Oak
40
35
Age of maximum
30 mean annual
volume increment
25
Top height (metres)
4
20
15
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
Age (years)
51
thinning control
Beech
40
Age of maximum
mean annual 10
volume increment
35
30
25
Top height (metres)
20
15
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
Age (years)
52
general Yield class curves
12
Age of maximum
25 mean annual
volume increment 10
6
20
4
Top height (metres)
15
10
53
thinning control
Poplar
45
14
12
40
10
35 8
6
30
4
Top height (metres)
25
20 Age of maximum
mean annual
volume increment
15
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Age (years)
54
general Yield class curves
Nothofagus
45
40
18
16
14
35
12
30 10
Top height (metres)
25
20
Age of maximum
mean annual
15 volume increment
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Age (years)
55
thinning control
Field Guides
• Timber measurement
A concise guide emphasising the Information needed for field assessments
of standing and felled timber.
Software
Forestry Commission software for modelling forest growth and yield includes:
56
Tariff number chart
Silvan House
231 Corstorphine Road
Edinburgh
EH12 7AT
£14.00 www.forestry.gov.uk