Scribd
Upload
66 views13 pages

Lab Da1

The document outlines the objectives, process model, and work breakdown structure for developing an online feedback management system. It describes the iterative waterfall process model being used and lists the key phases of requirement gathering, design, testing, and maintenance. Finally, it presents different types of work breakdown structures including phase-based, deliverable-based, and responsibility-based structures to break down the project work into smaller tasks.

Uploaded by

Sagun Shrestha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
66 views13 pages

Lab Da1

The document outlines the objectives, process model, and work breakdown structure for developing an online feedback management system. It describes the iterative waterfall process model being used and lists the key phases of requirement gathering, design, testing, and maintenance. Finally, it presents different types of work breakdown structures including phase-based, deliverable-based, and responsibility-based structures to break down the project work into smaller tasks.

Uploaded by

Sagun Shrestha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

LAB ASSESSMENT 1

Software Process Model & Software Project


Management
FALL SEMESTER 2022-23
L43+44 CSE3001

Pramit Karki 20BCE2896


Siddhant Karki 20BCE2936
Bigyat Pandey 20BCE2763
Analysis:
Online feedback management system is one of the most significant tools to
develop a website which is helpful for both admin and students to update their
details. Provides more security to the data and also provides security like password
management. Easy to add vast amounts of new user data to server databases. This
type of student feedback system reduces the work of physically examining the
feedback pages of each and every student. By using this application, we can find
multiple solutions. Less time consuming. It reduces a lot of paperwork.

Problem Definition:
The system retrieves information of the students and their concerns of their
level of knowledge they receive. Previous system lacked privacy. Lack of security
on the entered data. Manual work of recording data .Takes a lot of time accessing
the required data. The present system has security issues like it doesn’t have a proper
authentication and authorization system. Time consuming to upload the new student
information to the database. Decision making power is provided by this system.

Objectives:

1. HOD:
HOD have the authority to manage the whole project. The feedback question
will be given by the HOD. The HOD will enter his/her username and
password, if the HOD does not have an account they have to create a new
account. As the details are filled the faculty/staff dashboard appears in which
they can fill self-appraisal, peer appraisal.

2. Faculty:
The users of the Online Feedback Management System are members of
faculty. When a faculty enters the faculty id and password the database
checks whether the faculty id and password are valid. If valid their account
will be opened and it contains the feedback report.
3. Student:
In this user login the account through the valid login string which is
provided by the admin, after login the student can give the feedback to
faculty .The given feedback will be stored in the table and the admin can
take decision on that result. The one login string will be valid for given
feedback once. The student module working is.

Process model:
The process model we choose for our project is the Iterative Waterfall
Model.
The Iterative Waterfall Model is the extension of the Classical Waterfall
model. This model is almost the same as the classical waterfall model except some
modifications are made to improve the performance of the software development.
The iterative waterfall model provides customer’s feedback paths from each phase
to its previous phases except for the Feasibility study phase.
For the Online Feedback Management System Iterative waterfall model suits
better than any other model, as the Online Feedback Management System requires
no big updates once it is developed and it is stable. No big changes are required
and even if minor updates are required we can do it with the help of the feedback
paths going to that particular phase and updating it. As our requirements are
fulfilled we choose the iterative waterfall model.

Other models like classical waterfall model, Incremental model, Prototype


model, Rad model, SPIRAL MODEL doesn’t suit the Online Feedback
Management System because classical waterfall model don’t have feedback path
so that we can’t come back to the particular phase for any updates or to solve
errors and INCREMENTAL MODEL is normally used for the projects which need
to be incremented version wise but Online Feedback Management System doesn’t
require the increments to be done and using PROTOTYPE MODEL, a product
cannot be developed in short period of time as the requirements are refined in later
prototypes, User Involvement High, quick initial reviews are not possible. It
doesn’t give emphasis on risk analysis. As per the focus of this ONLINE
FEEDBACK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM “ITERATIVE WATERFALL MODEL”
is the best methodology that suits this development.
Advantages:
1. The Iterative waterfall model is very easy to understand and use.
2. Every phase contains a feedback path to its previous phase.
3. This is a simple way to make changes or any modifications at any phase.
4. By using this model, developers can complete projects earlier.
5. Customer involvement is not required during software development.
6. This model is suitable for large and complex projects.

Disadvantages:
1. There is no feedback path for the feasibility study phase.
2. This model is not suitable if requirements are not clear.
3. It can be more costly.
4. There is no process for risk handling.
5. Customers can view the final project. There is no prototype for taking
customer reviews.
6. This model does not work well for short projects.
7. If modifications are required repeatedly then it can be more complex projects.

Project Management Tools:


Gantt Chart:
A Gantt chart is a type of bar chart that illustrates a project schedule
PERT Chart:
A Pert chart is a project management tool used to schedule, organize and coordinate
tasks within a project.
Timeline Chart:
A timeline chart is a visual rendition of a series of events and milestones of the
project.
07/18/2022 2 07/19/2022

Brainstorming

07/25/2022 2 07/26/2022

07/20/2022 8 07/31/2022

Requirement

07/27/2022 8 08/07/2022

08/01/2022 9 08/13/2022

Analysis

08/08/2022 9 08/19/2022

08/14/2022 20 09/10/2022

Design

08/20/2022 20 09/16/2022

09/11/2022 18 10/04/2022

Testing
18
09/17/2022 10/10/2022

10/05/2022 12 10/22/2022

Maintenance

10/11/2022 12 10/28/2022

10/23/2022 2 11/06/2022

Documentation

10/29/2022 2 11/12/2022
Work Breakdown Structure
Breaking work into smaller tasks is a common productivity technique used to
make the work more manageable and approachable. Thus for Projects we use a tool
called Work Breakdown Structure which uses this technique. There are three types
of Work Breakdown Structure they are as follows:

1. Phase Based WBS: The phase-based WBS displays the final deliverable on top,
with the WBS levels below showing the five phases of a project (initiation, planning,
execution, control and closeout).
2. Deliverable Based WBS: A deliverable-based WBS first breaks down the project
into all the major areas of the project scope as control accounts, and then divides
those into project deliverables and work packages.
3. Responsibility Based WBS: The responsibility based WBS divides the entire
project based on the activities and the responsibilities of the organization units who
will work on the project.
1. Phase Based WBS
2. Deliverable Based WBS
3. Responsibility Based WBS

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy