Alternative Thinking

Tail Hedging Strategies

Many investors insure against tail risk directly,

often by purchasing puts or structuring collars.
Unfortunately, experience and financial theory
suggest that the long-term cost of such insurance
strategies will be larger than the payouts.

We describe an alternative approach to hedging a

portfolio’s equity tails.

AQR Capital Management, LLC

Two Greenwich Plaza
Greenwich, CT 06830

Fourth Quarter 2012 p: +1.203.742.3600

f: +1.203.742.3100
w: aqr.com
 Alternative Thinking | Tail Hedging Strategies 1

Tail Hedging Strategies Traditionally, tail-hedging strategies rely on the

equity index options markets, which offer downside
Executive Summary
protection, but at a substantial cost. Not only do
 We believe tail hedging strategies can have a these strategies carry a negative long-term expected
role in portfolios, but traditional approaches return, they also tend to be more expensive when
leave room for improvement most needed. Economically, this makes sense, as
investors should expect to pay for the right to
 We describe three strategies that have
transfer risk to another party, and to pay more when
empirically shown a tendency to provide
that risk is greater. However, the high cost makes it
protection against large losses in equity markets,
less likely that investors will have patience to keep
and more attractive returns than passive
bleeding the “insurance costs” through sometimes
exposure to equity put options
many years of normal market conditions (Exhibit 1).
 Finally, we argue diversification should have a
role in a tail hedging strategies An Alternative Tail Risk Strategy

An alternative approach should be more cost-

effective and provide protection against the
Why Tail Hedges?
dominant risk in a portfolio ‒ typically, equities.
Trend-following strategies are one example: They
Tail hedges are one way to potentially limit losses in
cannot give as reliable downside protection as index
adverse markets. They may better enable investors
puts, but they have provided surprisingly consistent
to stick with their positions through bad times and
safe-haven services when most needed, while
thus be long-term. Tail hedges may even create
delivering positive long-run returns. A recent AQR
potential for investors to opportunistically pick up
white paper shows that a simulated trend-following
risky assets in times of market distress (often at fire-
1 composite earned positive returns impressively in
sale prices).
nine of the ten worst drawdowns of a 60/40

Exhibit 1 | Hypothetical Cumulative Growth of $100 into 1-Year OTM Puts on the S&P, 1996 - 2012

$110
$105
$100
$95
$90
$85
$80
$75
$70

Source AQR. Notes: The put portfolio buys one-year SPX 10% out-of-the-money (OTM) index puts (constant notional sizing, combining March, June, September and
December options with equal weights). Chart is provided for illustrative purposes only and is not based on an actual portfolio AQR manages. Hypothetical data has
inherent limitations, some of which are disclosed in the Appendix hereto. Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance.

1
See our white paper “Chasing Your Own Tail (Risk)” for more on pitfalls
and potential solutions to tail risk hedging.
2 Alternative Thinking | Tail Hedging Strategies

Exhibit 2 | Total Returns of a U.S. 60/40 Portfolio, 10 Year US Bonds, Gold, and a Hypothetical Trend-
Following Strategy in the Ten Worst Drawdowns for 60/40, Simulated Data, 1903–2012

150%
Oil Crisis

100%
Stagflation
Panic of 1907
Post WWI Dot-com Global
Great Bubble Financial
50% Recession
Depression Bursting Crisis
Recession of
World War I 1937-1938
0%

1987 Stock
-50% Market Crash

-100%
Sep 1906 - Nov 1916 - Oct 1919 - Aug 1929 - Feb 1937 - Nov 1968 - Dec 1972 - Aug 1987 - Aug 2000 - Oct 2007 -
Nov 1907 Dec 1917 Jun 1921 May 1932 Mar 1938 Jun 1970 Sep 1974 Nov 1987 Sep 2002 Feb 2009

60/40 Portfolio Returns US 10Y Bond Returns

Gold Returns Time-Series Momentum Returns

Source: “A Century of Evidence on Trend-Following Investing” by Hurst, -Ooi and -Pedersen (2012). The Hypothetical Trend-Following Strategy performance is a
backtest for the time period January 1903–December 2012, gross of fees. The 60/40 portfolio has 60% of the portfolio invested in the S&P 500 Index and 40%
invested in U.S. 10-year bonds. The portfolio is rebalanced to the 60/40 weights at the end of each month, and no fees or transaction costs are subtracted from the
portfolio returns. Please read performance disclosures in the Appendix for a description of the investment universe and the allocation methodology used to construct
the Trend-Following Strategy. Markets considered only where data existed during the time period. Chart is provided for illustrative purposes only and is not based on
an actual portfolio AQR manages. Hypothetical data has inherent limitations, some of which are disclosed in the Appendix hereto. Past performance is not a guarantee
of future performance.

stock/bond portfolio since 1903 (see Exhibit 2). example, they can be constrained against taking
More-typical safe haven assets – gold and Treasuries net long positions in equities.
– did not provide as consistent downside protection.
 Defensive Equities – a stock selection strategy
We believe in diversification also when it comes to based on company fundamentals. Such a
cost-effective tail hedges, so we look at multiple strategy may seek to capture the relative
strategies. Because equity markets can suffer for outperformance of high-quality companies
different reasons, tail risk strategies should be during weak equity markets. We find that a
diversified to benefit across a range of weak long/short stock selection strategy based on
macroeconomic environments. We think core measures of companies’ quality and risk delivers
components of cost-effective approach to tail negative beta to the market with zero-to-positive
hedging should include: long-term expected returns.

 Customized Trend Following – strategies  Global Macro – a diversified set of dynamic

designed to profit from persistent trends in strategies that deliver tactical exposures to safe-
equity, fixed-income, currencies and haven assets (long), risk premia (short), and
commodities markets. These strategies can be volatility (long). For example, the strategy may
customized with the goal of protecting investors seek long exposures to safe-haven assets such as
from sudden losses in equity markets; for sovereign bonds when bonds are perceived to be
 Alternative Thinking | Tail Hedging Strategies 3

attractive, and may seek short exposure to risk exhibited smaller “tails” than a 60/40 portfolio, a
premia such as the credit risk (by purchasing risk parity portfolio of market risk premia and a
credit default protection) when credit is hedge fund index still lost money in the worst equity
perceived to be expensive. market episodes since 1990, and a portfolio of hedge
fund risk premia was barely flat.
All these strategies are designed to perform
especially well through weak equity markets when In contrast, Exhibit 3B shows that the three tail-risk
most investments suffer. Exhibit 3A illustrates the strategies described above performed well in
average performance of three investment styles from negative tail events ‒ exhibiting appealing convexity
2
extremely weak through extremely strong equity overall, as they were designed to do.
markets. Even though each of these approaches

Exhibit 3A | When Equities Suffer, So Do Many Other Strategies, 1990-2012

6%

4%

2%

0%

-2%
Hedge
Hedge Funds
Funds (HFRI)
(HFRI)

-4% Hypothetical
Market Market Risk Premia
Risk Premiums
Hypothetical
Hedge Fund RiskHedge Fund Risk Premia
Premiums
-6%
-8% -6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8%

MSCI World, Monthly Returns

Exhibit 3B | Protection from Equity Tails, Without Poor Returns in Normal Markets, 1990-2012

6%

4%

2%

0%

-2% Hedges - Trend Following

Hypothetical Hedges - Trend Following
-4% Hypothetical
Hedges Hedges
- Defensive - Defensive Equity
Equities
Hypothetical
Hedges Hedges - Global Macro
- Global Macro
-6%
-8% -6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8%

MSCI World, Monthly Returns

Source: AQR. The hypothetical portfolios have been created for illustrative purposes and and are not based on an actual portfolio AQR manages. Hypothetical data has inherent
limitations, some of which are disclosed in the Appendix hereto. Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance. Broad-based securities indices are unmanaged and are
not subject to fees and expenses typically associated with managed accounts or investment funds. Investments cannot be made directly in an index.

2
One can link the patterns in Exhibits 3A-B to equity market correlations.
Hedge fund indices and market risk premia have equity market
correlations above 0.5. Hedge fund risk premia, when properly designed
to target market-neutrality, have a market correlation below 0.2. They are
better diversifiers but still not tail hedges for the downside scenarios.
4 Alternative Thinking | Tail Hedging Strategies

A diversified composite of these three strategies

would have provided clearly more cost-effective tail
protection than the put option buying approach
shown in Exhibit 1. Regressing the simulated
composite on the 1-year 10% OTM put strategy
between 1997 and 2011 would have provided
significant alpha, with a beta of one and correlation
0.74 between the two series.

In all, we believe cost-effective, proactive tail

hedging strategies, together with drawdown control
rules, can offer valuable downside protection for
portfolios when most needed.
 Alternative Thinking | Tail Hedging Strategies 5

Important Disclosures
This document has been provided to you solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation
to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The factual information set forth herein has been obtained or derived
from sources believed by the author and AQR Capital Management, LLC (“AQR”) to be reliable but it is not necessarily all- inclusive and is not guaranteed as to its
accuracy and is not to be regarded as a representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information’s accuracy or completeness, nor should the attached
information serve as the basis of any investment decision. This document is intended exclusively for the use of the person to whom it has been delivered by AQR, and
it is not to be reproduced or redistributed to any other person. The information set forth herein has been provided to you as secondary information and should not be
the primary source for any investment or allocation decision. This document is subject to further review and revision. Past performance is not a guarantee of
future performance.

Broad-based securities indices are unmanaged and are not subject to fees and expenses typically associated with managed accounts or investment funds.
Investments cannot be made directly in an index.

This document is not research and should not be treated as research. This document does not represent valuation judgments with respect to any financial instrument,
issuer, security or sector that may be described or referenced herein and does not represent a formal or official view of AQR.

The views expressed reflect the current views as of the date hereof and neither the author nor AQR undertakes to advise you of any changes in the views expressed
herein. It should not be assumed that the author or AQR will make investment recommendations in the future that are consistent with the views expressed herein, or
use any or all of the techniques or methods of analysis described herein in managing client accounts. AQR and its affiliates may have positions (long or short) or
engage in securities transactions that are not consistent with the information and view s expressed in this document.

The information contained herein is only as current as of the date indicated, and may be superseded by subsequent market even ts or for other reasons. Charts and
graphs provided herein are for illustrative purposes only. The information in this document has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be
reliable; however, neither AQR nor the author guarantees the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information. Nothing contained herein constitutes
investment, legal, tax or other advice nor is it to be relied on in making an investment or other decision.

There can be no assurance that an investment strategy will be successful. Historic market trends are not reliable indicators of actual future market behavior or future
performance of any particular investment which may differ materially, and should not be relied upon as such. Target allocations contained herein are subject to
change. There is no assurance that the target allocations will be achieved, and actual allocations may be significantly different than that shown here. This document
should not be viewed as a current or past recommendation or a solicitation of a n offer to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy.

The information in this document may contain projections or other forward‐looking statements regarding future events, targets, forecasts or expectations regarding
the strategies described herein, and is only current as of the date indicated. There is no assurance that such events or targets will be achieved, and may be
significantly different from that shown here. The information in this document, including statements concerning financial market trends, is based on current market
conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Performance of all cited indices is calculated on a total
return basis with dividends reinvested.

The investment strategy and themes discussed herein may be unsuitable for investors depending on their specific investment objectives and financial situation.
Please note that changes in the rate of exchange of a currency may affect the value, price or income of an investment adversely.

Neither AQR nor the author assumes any duty to, nor undertakes to update forward looking statements. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made or
given by or on behalf of AQR, the author or any other person as to the accuracy and completeness or fairness of the information contained in this document, and no
responsibility or liability is accepted for any such information. By accepting this document in its entirety, the recipient acknowledges its understanding and
acceptance of the foregoing statement.

Hypothetical performance results (e.g., quantitative backtests) have many inherent limitations, some of which, but not all, are described herein. No representation is
being made that any fund or account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown herein. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between
hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently realized by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance
results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading
record can completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading. For example, the ability to withstand losses or adhere to a particular trading program
in spite of trading losses are material points which can adversely affect actual trading results. The hypothetical performance results contained herein represent the
application of the quantitative models as currently in effect on the date first written above and there can be no assurance that the models will remain the same in the
future or that an application of the current models in the future will produce similar results because the relevant market and economic conditions that prevailed
during the hypothetical performance period will not necessarily recur. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of
any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results, all of which can adversely affect actual
trading results. Discounting factors may be applied to reduce suspected anomalies. This backtest’s return, for this period, may vary depending on the date it is run.
Hypothetical performance results are presented for illustrative purposes only. In addition, our transaction cost assumptions utilized in backtests , where noted, are
based on AQR's historical realized transaction costs and market data. Certain of the assumptions have been made for modeling purposes and are unlikely to be
realized. No representation or warranty is made as to the reasonableness of the assumptions made or that all assumptions used in achieving the returns have been
stated or fully considered. Changes in the assumptions may have a material impact on the hypothetical returns presented. Hypothetical performance is gross of
advisory fees, net of transaction costs, and includes the reinvestment of dividends. If the expenses were reflected, the performance shown would be lower. Where
noted, the hypothetical net performance data presented reflects the deduction of a model advisory fee and does not account for administrative expenses a fund or
managed account may incur. Actual advisory fees for products offering this strategy may vary.

There is a risk of substantial loss associated with trading commodities, futures, options, derivatives and other financial instruments. Before trading, investors should
carefully consider their financial position and risk tolerance to determine if the proposed trading style is appropriate. Investors should realize that when trading
futures, commodities, options, derivatives and other financial instruments one could lose the full balance of their account. It is also possible to lose more than the
initial deposit when trading derivatives or using leverage. All funds committed to such a trading strategy should be purely risk capital.

The white papers discussed herein can be provided upon request. Times Series Momentum Strategy:

The Time Series Momentum Strategy was constructed with an equal-weighted combination of 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month time series momentum strategies
for 59 markets across 4 major asset classes — 24 commodities, 11 equity indices, 15 bond markets and 9 currency pairs

— from January 1903 to June 2012. Since not all markets have return data going back to 1903, we construct the strategies using the largest number of assets for
which return data exist at each point in time. We use futures returns when they are available. Prior to the availability of futures data, we rely on cash index returns
financed at local short rates for each country. Please refer to the A Century Evidence on Trend Following Investing white paper for additional information. Please
inquire at AQR for a copy of this paper.
 AQR Capital Management, LLC
Two Greenwich Plaza, Greenwich, CT 06830
p: +1.203.742.3600 I f: +1.203.742.3100 I w: aqr.com