Roshna Article 1
Roshna Article 1
Credit Risk Management and Profitability: A Study From Nepalese Commercial Bank
ABSTRACT
The main aim of the study is to investigate the impact of credit risk management on bank profitability
in Nepalese commercial banks. Non-performing loan ratio, Leverage ratio, Capital adequacy ratio,
Loan loss provision, Credit interest to credit facilities are independent variable whereas return
on assets is dependent variable. Data has been collected from the Annual Reports of selected
commercial banks, Banking and Financial Statistics and Bank Supervision Report published by
Nepal Rastra Bank. The study is based on 25 samples making 250 observations. The independent
study is completed using a blend of Independent t-test, Pearson’s Correction, analysis of variance
(ANOVA), multiple regression analysis. The result shows that, capital adequacy ratio, leverage
ratio, non-performing loan ratio, loan loss provision ratio is negative relationship to dependent
variable return on assets. Likewise, credit interest to credit facilities is positively related to return
on assets.
Table 1 shows that return on assets has to be a minimum value of 5.550 percent to a
minimum value of -0.9860 percent to a maximum of 41.82 percent with an average
maximum value of 18.040 percent with a mean of 13.6 percent and standard deviation 4.65
of 1.764 percent and standard deviation 1.753 percent. The leverage ratio noticed to be a
percent. The capital adequacy ratio noticed minimum value of 1.030 times to a maximum
Table 2. Pearson’s correlation matrix for the dependent and independent variables
ROA CAR LR NPLR CI/CF LLP
ROA 1
CAR -.162* 1
.048
LR -.017 -.722** 1
.832 .000
NPLR -.548** -.121 -.125 1
.000 .143 .129
CI/CF .207* -.174* -.126 .299** 1
.011 .034 .124 .000
LLP -.656** -.074 -.155 .932** .228** 1
.000 .368 .059 .000 .005
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
The result shows that non-performing loan ratio to credit facilities is positively associated to
and leverage ratio are negatively correlated return on assets which indicate that higher the
to return on assets which indicate higher the credit interest to credit facilities higher would
non-performing loan ratio lower would be be the return on assets.
return on assets. It also indicates higher the
leverage ratio lower would be return on assets. Regression analysis
Likewise, loan loss provision ratio and capital In order to test the statistical significance and
adequacy ratio are also negatively correlated to robustness of the results, this study relies on
return on assets which indicate higher the loan secondary data analysis based on the regression
loss provision ratio lower would be the return models specified in the chapter three. The
on assets. It indicates that an increase in capital regression result of credit risk variables on
adequacy ratio leads to decrease in the return return on assets is presented in Table 3.
on assets. The result shows that credit interest
Table 3.
Estimated regression results on determinants of return on assets
Mod- Intercept Regression Coefficients of Adj. R2 SEE F
els CAR LR NPLR CI/CF LLPR
1 2.601 -.061 .020 1.77 3.981
(5.87)** (1.99)*
2 1.866 -.015 -.006 1.76 .045
(3.72)** (-.21)
3 1.069 -31.300 .296 1.47 63.107
(7.17)** (-7.94)**
4 .103 .162 .036 1.72 6.564
(.15) (2.56)**
5 .897 -.240 .426 1.33 110.84
(6.56)** (-10.52)**
6 .060 -31.875 .087 -.422 .461 1.29 43.128
(.12) (-3.24)** (1.73) (-6.81)**
7 1.663 -.054 -30.924 -.422 .470 1.28 44.683
(4.81)** (-2.34)* (-3.32)** (-6.900)**
8 5.288 -.138 -.239 .051 1.71 5.018
(4.45)** (-3.16)** (-2.43)**
9 .913 -27.722 -.406 .453 1.29 62.345
(6.84)** (-2.88)* (-6.58)**
10 .625 -.043 -.019 -34.126 .076 -.435 .470 1.27 27.266
(.48) (-1.17) (.23) (-3.47)** (1.44) (-7.02)**
Notes:
1. Figures in parentheses are t-values.
2. The asterisk (**), (*) sign indicates that the results are significant at 1% and 5% level of
significance respectively.
The results show that beta coefficient for capital coefficient for non-performing loan ratio and
adequacy ratio and leverage ratio are negative. loan loss provision ratio are negative and
This indicates that lower the capital adequacy significant with return on assets. It indicates
ratio, higher would be the return on assets. This that higher the non-performing loan ratio lower
finding is similar to the findings of Shrieves & would be the return on assets. This finding is
Dahl (1992). The negative beta coefficients for similar to Noman et al (2015) and Jha and Hui
leverage ratio indicate that higher the leverage (2012). Similarly, result reveals that higher the
ratio, lower would be the return on assets. The loan loss provision, lower would be the return
study also reveals that the beta coefficients is on assets.
positive for credit interest to credit facilities
with return on assets. The results, hence,
indicate that higher the credit interest to credit 5. Conclusion
facilities, higher would be the return on assets. Commercial banks play an important role
This finding is consistent with the findings of for economic development, and foster
Zoubi, (2007) and Gizaw (2015). The beta economic growth of any country through their