Cdna102013ac 001
Cdna102013ac 001
energy
Report
EUR 10201 EN-FR-DE
Commission of the European Communities
energy
FINAL REPORT
LEGAL NOTICE
Neither the Commission of the European Communities nor any person acting on behalf
of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following
information
SUMMARY
The original purpose o-f this project had been the design,
contructi on and monitoring o-f an easy-made inexpensive solar
air collector with a prescribed mode o-f operation and a
specific destination : The collector is to be mounted on the
south oriented walls o-f passive solar buildings, in a way to
form an integral part of them, effecting in the passive heating
of the buildings. Having defined its purpose, it is easily
derived that tht· collector ought to perform through natural
c on veci, i on .
In this project, as has been modified. a solar air
collector with the prescribed characteristics has been studied
theoretically, using an original computer algorithm for as an
"exact" approach to the problem as possible. Comparatively
little has been reported up to now on collectors of this
specific form and mode of operation. Results investigate the
relationship of the constructional factors and their influence
on the overall collector efficiency. An investigation of the
constructional materials is also performed and property values
for a variety of them are reported. Costing of the possible
solutions is computed and methods for the monitor ing and
testing of the? collectors are included. An extended list of
references is given for t lie field of solar air collecctors at
the beg inni rig of the report.
N,
TABLE OF C O N T E N T S
SUMMARY III
PART 1 : INTRODUCTION 1
INTRODUCTION 3
PART 2 : BIBLIOGRAPHY WITH ABSTRACTS 5
1. BIBLIOGRAPHY WITH ABSTRACTS 7
1.1 General 7
1.2 Theory 10
1.3 Material 27
1.4 Design 42
1.5 Testing 55
1.6 Performance 71
P A R T 3 : THEORETICAL (ÄLCUIATIONS 79
2. FUNDAMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR COLLECTOR DESIGN 81
3. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND RESTRICTIONS 83
3.1 Assumptions resulting fron the collector
design and mounting 83
3.2 Assumptions cxsncerning the analytical method 83
4. ANALYTICAL EXAMINATION OF THE PROCESSES
ON THE COLLECTOR (XMPONENTS, TAKEN APART
AND RESULTING EQUATIONS 85
4.1 The solar absorber 85
4.1.1 Convection along the absorber 85
4.1.1.1 Convection in laminai flow 88
4.1.1.2 Convection in turbulent flow 89
4.1.2 The transition from laminar to
turbulent flow 91
4.1.3 The absorber radiation heat exchange 94
4.1.4 Thermal equilibrium on the absorber 96
4.1.5 Longitudinal heat flow in the absorber 97
4.2 The collector glazing 98
4.2.1 Convection along both sides of glazing 98
4.2.2 Radiation exchanged from the
glazing surfaces 99
4.2.3 Longitudinal heat flow along the absorber 100
4.2.4 Thermal equilibrium on glazing 101
5. THE COLLECTOR COMPONENTS, FORMING A
COUPLED SYSTEM 102
6. DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPUTER ALGORITHM 103
7. NUMERICAL RESULTS 107
7.1 The fundamental collector configuration 107
7.2 The solar absorber temperature 108
7.3 The variation of efficiency vs.
collector parameters 109
VI
I N T R O D U C T I O N
INTRODUCTI ON
B I B L I O G R A P H Y W I T H A B S T R A C T S
1. BIBLIOGRAPHY WITH ABSTRACTS
3.1 GENERAL
HOW TO SUN DRY YOUR FOOD. COMPLETE PLANS FOR A SOLAR FOOD DRYEE
CEC-12DG, 1976
1.2 THEORY
ι
THERMOSYPHON CIRCULATION IN SOLAR COLLECTORS ¡
Solar Energy, Vol. 24, pp. 191 198, 1980 Pergamon Press,
Great Britain
Solar Energy, Vol. 13, pp. 363 - 371, 1971 Pergamon Press,
Great Britain
Solar Energy, Vol. 13, pp. 293 - 300, 1971 Pergamon Press,
Great Britain
Solar Energy, Vol. 27, pp. 109 - 113, 1981 Pergamon Press,
Great Britain
alternate basis if the flow rate and the slope and intercept of
one efficiency curve are known.
\
Experimental measurements are presented for free convective
heat transfer across inclined air layers, heated from below,
and bounded by one V-corrugated plate and one flat plate. The
measurements covered three values for the ratio , A, (average
15
W. Schlichting
1.3 MATERIAL
Solar Energy, Voi. 24, pp. 511 - 513, 1980 Pergamon Press,
Great Britain
Solar Energy, Vol. 25, pp. 555 — 561, 1980 Pergamon Press,
Great Britain
29
Solar Energy, Vol. 8, pp. 138 - 141, 1964 Pergamon Press, Great
Bri tai n
Solar Energy, Vol. 24, pp. 541 - 550, Pergamon Press, Great
Bri tain
described.
H.L. Redfoot, W.C. Burkhardt and B.D. Anson, Rohm and Haas Co,
Plastic Div.
E. Clark, W.E. Roberts, J.W. Grimes and E.J. Embree, Center for
Building Technology, National Engineering Laboratory, National
Bureau of Standards, Washington DC 20234
1.4 DESIGN
Solar Energy, Vol. 12, pp. 447 - 456, 1969 Pergamon Press,
Great Britain
Solar Energy, Vol. 15, pp. 41 - 49, 1972 Pergamon Press, Great
Britain
Solar Energy, Vol. 13, pp. 283 - 288, 1971 Pergamon Press,
Great Britain
provision must be made for the free passage of air through the
unit in direct contact with the heated plate. The shape of the
flow passages is entirely arbitrary, but from considerations of
manufacturing simplicity and cost, it is likely that the final
decision will be to use rectangular cross sections.
Experimental evidence is now available for the case of the
asymmetrically-heated rectangular duct, which will allow the
prediction of heat transfer and pressure drop for the
fully-developed turbulent flow region. Further work is still
required to establish similar relationships for the developing
flow region, and to assess the effects on these relationships
of aspect ratio and varying degrees of asymmetry in the heat
flux. The overall design of such a unit is viewed in the light
of the existing knowledge in this field, and an attempt is made
to present a logical design procedure based on technical and
economic grounds.
Solar Energy, Vol. 27, pp. 413 - 420, 1981 Pergamon Press,
Great Britain
Solar Enertiy, Vol. 25, pp. 521 - 526, 1980 Pergamon Press,
Great Britain
DESIGN DATA FOR SOLAR HEATING OF AIR USING A HEAT EXCHANGER AND
STORAGE SYSTEM
Solar Energy, Vol. 13, pp. 223 - 242, 1971 Pergamon Press,
Great Britain
A THERMOS I PHON FLOOR HEAT ING DES IGN CONS IDERATI ONS AND
PERFORMANCE DATA
23 - 26 May 1982
Chair of Construction
operated as a heat source for the ventilation air all over the
year. The results showed that solar collectors used for heating
of ventilation air can be the economically motivateci supplement
to the conventional heating.
Right from the onset of this study it. became apparent that
the phrase "passive solar test, facility" meant very different
things to different people. Furthermore, views varied widely on
the purpose and the need for such a facility. Some experts
firmly backed the modelling approach, asserting that modelling
was already sufficiently refined and available, to virtually
remove the need for physical test altogether. Other experts
disagreed believing that simple and pragmatic physical
assessments using realistic environments were essential.
In writing this document, we found too that it. was difficult
to follow a simple linear course in the development of the
ideas. Rather, a. network of concepts had to be developed. This
stemmed from the diffuse nature of the problem, that, is, there
was not a well defined target, rather s.n area, to explore. For
example, a "climatic, hot-box" for measuring U-values of glazing
components, could be classed as a "passive solar test
facility". Whilst at the other end of the spectrum we might be
considering a fully monitored test house.
Although we have made reference to the broad range· of
activities, which can loosely be included under the headincj of
"passive solar testing", we have narrowed down to a particular
srea, namely component testing in highly standardised and
realistic outdoor test cells. We would like to make it clear
that this does not imply that we regard this as a superior
64
MISE EM E V I D E N C E D E S C O U R A N T S DE C O N N E C T I O N AU V O I S I N A G E DE LA
7
SURFACE D UN C A P T E U R S O L A I R E . M E A S U R E DES TEMPERATURES
70
1.6 PERFORMANCE
Solar Energy, Vol. 12, pp. 525 - 530, 1969 Pergamon Press,
Great Br i tain
Solar Energy, Vol. 2S, pp). 363 - 370, 1982 Pergamon Press,
Great Britain
W. Scott Morris
75
Technology
F>*=*RT 3
T H E O R E T I C A L C A L C U L A T I O N S
81
wher e
u.v are coordinates of speed
t is the temperature inside the boundary layer
α
is the thermal diffusivity of air
- E s »,
It is to be noted that the superposition method can be
applied for laminar as well as for turbulent flow conditions
and is very well suited for numerical processing with a digital
computer.
Toward the implementation of superposition, the continuous
variation of the absorber temperature is approximated through a
stepwise function. To this, the absorber length (hight) is
divided in η equal intervals; the temperature in each interval
is considered constant and equal to the temperature at the
middle of the interval, namely t.
In this way, the vertical plate is divided into η
horizontal strip»s of equal dimensions, each strip having
const ant temper atur e.
To calculate the total heat flow from the surface through
convection use is made of the relation
= ~^2Ci <9t
¡ / 3 V>W (4.2)
where
88
- k : ( 9 t . / 3 y ) w = h. ùt^j <4.3)
= y^h(x,l : ) Δ ^ (4.4)
i
4.1.1.1 C o n v e c t i o n i n l a m i n a r f l o w
q
H
( x ) = 4 . 5 8 ( x T T1/1 θ f " (4.6)
H S W
4.1.1.2 C o n v e c t i o n i n t u r b u l e n t f l o w
η ri
d/dxlu 2 dy = qß 6dy Ί^/ρ (4.8)
where
Β is the thermal expansion coefficient for gases (ß=l/T)
τ is the shear stress given by
W
1,
τ = 0 . 0 2 2 8 H 2 . (V/u δ ) "ρ (4.10)
w s
α is gi ven by
θ = θ [l
I 1-
- (y/δ
(y/δ>J
) I (4. 12)
w
for the temperature, and
m
u = u, (y/δ ) (1 - y/δ)1* (4.13)
for the velocity profile in the direction of flow
o t = ( a / G r V ) 1 3 x/CtA<4>) (4.16)
where
a the thermal diffusivity of air
Gr the Grashof number Gr=g6G w x 3 /v 2
ν the kinematic viscosity of air
0.8 <*
C = O.14Pr
Α(Φ) 0.71 for the vertical plate
út = Σ ^
I
2/4 22 1
u¿ = Δ Τ ' / T[IcC££((g(gg
/ qßß//AVvT >))^ Pr1 // ]1 ( f ΔΤ5/3 dx) 1 /*
Pr (4.17)
dq = -k.A9t/9>:
Cp = 5.775 W/m2 g r d
(the- shape factor to the environment is 1)
e
L
V g6 "cses es-rg) (4.19)
6. D E S C R I P T I O N OF THE C O M P U T E R ALGORITHM
NUMERICA!. RESULT!
o
For all results the ambient t e m p e r a t u r e i s '=, C, t h a t is
that of a t y p i cai! winter da/ in Greece.-, and the?
o
room—t o - b e — h e a l ed t e m p e r at. u r e is 18 C.
T h e a.bsoi ber - t o - g l az i n g di stance has been 20 centimeters.
F i n a l i y. for all calculations the? absorber and glazing
have beeii d i v i d e d into 40 s t r i p s ; o f equal width, that is in the
iterative computational procedure 41 points biave-1 been
c etri s i d e r ed .
Sriiall deviations to the above stated constant values have
been deliberately introduced, to study the influence of some
parameters in the overall system efficiency.
Results have been computed for insolation values ranqinq
108
t: i ι ':. ι ; Ί S; O 1 ¿1 i. o r ι e f f e c t ..
smal 1 .
REFERENCES
4. 8c tu. th H,. í "Ε:; η n-.ties Ver falir eri ? urn Berechnen des
Wa.er meueberganges in ebenen und r otat i onssymmetr i. schen
laminaren Gir enz inch i elit en bei konstanter und veraenderl i cher
Wai idtemper atu.r " , Forch. Geb. Ingrws., 20,2, 1954,s. 37-47.
F»*í=*re-r
A I R C O L L E C T O R D E S I G N U S I N G
D I F F E R E N T M A T E R I A L S
P R O P E R T I E S OF T H E M A T E R I A L S
115
8.1.1.1 P o l y c a r b o n a t e s h e e t s
TABLE 4
TYPICAL PROPERTY VALUES OF POLYCARBONATE
Property Units Value
Physical
E q u i l i b r i um 1 00 ' C /. 0 . 58
Deflection Temperature
0.46 MPa 'C 138
1.82 MPa 'C 127138
Specific Heat J/KgK 1.25
Thermal Conductivity W/mK 0.19
Coeff. of Thermal Expansion m/m/7C 0.0000675
Vi c at S o f t e n i n g Temperature 'C 152157
Brittleness Temperature 'C ë~129
Oxygen Index 25
Mechanical
Tensile Strength
Yield MPa 62
Ultimate MPa 65
E 1 ognat i on
Yi el d "/. 68
Rupture 7. 110
T en s i 1 e M o d υ. 1 u s MPa 2 400
Flexura] Strength MPa 93
Fl ex cirai M o d u l u s MPa 2300
Compressive Strength MPa 86
Compressive Modulus MPa 2400
Shear Strength
Yield MPa 40
Ultimate MPa 70
Shear M o d u l u s MPa 790
Izod Impact Strength
Notched (3.2mm) J/m 640850
124
8.1.1.2 P o l y c a r b o n a t e p r o f i l e d s h e e
t (double wa11 ed)
35
30
25
20
IS
10
5
TABLE 5
PROPERTV PROFILE OF DWPS
Pr opter ty Uni ts Typi cal val uè
Thickness mm 6 7 10
Weight. Kg/m2
Elongation
Yield 7. 6-8 6-8 6-8
Rupture 7. 110 110 110
Sti f f ness
Parallel Ribs Kg/cm of def 1 . 14.5 17.2 36.2
Maximum Load Kg 7.2 10.4 13.6
Perpendicular Ribs Kg/cm of defl. 0.9 1.45 1.81
Maximum Load Kg 1.36 2.26 2.72
Shear Modulus MPa 790 790 790
Impact Falling Dart
12.5 mm Radius Tip m/Kg 46.4 ë53 ï 53
Drop Dart
6 mm Raid i us Tip cm/Kg ï 662 ï 662 ï 662
Air Cannon 37 mm Radius Tip m/Kg 66 66 66
Light Transmi ttance 7. 90' 83 83 83
thermal
U-Factor W/m2K 3.69 3.52 3.4
Heat Distortion Temp.
- 0.46 MPa 'C 135 135 135
Maximum Service Tempt.
Short Term No Load 121 121 121
Coni, i nu ou s 82 82 82
Shading Coefficient 7. 0.92 0.92 0.92
Solar Transmission 7. 0.78 0.78 0.78
w
Coefficient of Linear
Thermal Expansion m/m/*C 0.0000675 0.0000675 0.000067
127
TABLE 6
PURLIN SPACING IN CM
Load ( Kg / square m )
75 125 175 225
Gauge
6 mm 100 80 70 60
7 mm 120 100 90 70
10 mm 240 120 100 90
8.1.1.3 A c r y l i c p l a s t i c s s h e e t s
8.1.1.4 A c r y l i c p r o f i l e d s h e e t (double
wal 1 ed)
129
TABLE 7
PROPERTY PROF ILE OF DWAC F OR 16 MM THICKNESS CLEAR DWAC
Property Units Typical Value
Heat Coefficient (u)
Wι nter Con d 11 i on W/m2K 3. 3
S u m m e r C ondi t ion W / m 2K 3. 2
Coefficient of Linear
Thermal Expansion m/m/K 0.00007
Max i mum Servi ce
Temperature without Load 'C 71
L.ight Transmi ttance V. 83
Shading Coefficient 0.97
Solar Transmission 7. 83
Average Sound Reduction dB 23
130
8.1.1.5 P o l y v i n y l F l u o r i d e
8.1.1.6 P o l y e s t er
8.1.2 Polytetraf1uoroethylene
135
This is the material known under the trade name Tef 1 ori of
the Du Pont. It is used mainly as inner glazing and especially
as Teflon FEP—f 1uorinåted ethylene propyl ene a copolymer of
tetr af 1uoroethylene and hex af 1uor opropylene.
As inner glazing it is used in one or two mil (0.025 to
0.05 mm) thickness. The properties that make the film useful in
this application are clarity, lightweight high temperature
resistance, long life and cost relative to water white glass.
As film has about 967 tr artsmi ttance. It is not as totally
transparent to infrared radiation as most plastics are
considered and it indicates significant resistance to low
temperature radiation heat loss.
On balance Teflon FEF' as inner glazing has overall
transmission of solar energy improved in comparison to other
double glazing systems. This translates to higher overall
energy collection on collectors using black chrome sur facet? and
at temperatures up to 50'C on collectors using flat black
surfaces.
The overall operating efficiency is not the only criteria
for judging glazings. He^at output as a function of cost is the
most important. This way the lightweight and low cost of Teflon
FEF' must be considered as the reason that makes it cost
effective in comparison with other products.
8.1.4 Gl a s s
two factors, '. ' index of Refraction and the C omposition of the
glas,.
0.017. or less.
a ! :· r a e i v ► - c -- n e e d s no r e s. 11 r f a c: i n q ,
e f f oc t. ..
r a t i os: d e ρ? e η cl i. η g t. h e? η e e d s ) .
pi e t r oc hern i c a l s .
Api pi ο η d i ;·: 9.
Hi ui ι Ίh 11 c i n e m i t. S a i ,·:
c o n t r a c t i on Ftq υ : r e 'ver v c
Low IR t r a n s m i l t a n c e
F m b r i l t l e m e n t at pr olonged
h i gh t. e m ρ e r a t u r e
Νο t r e c o mme η d e d f or i π η t- r
g 1 a z i rigs;
!;: ;:;] y s ! : : t ► · Mori er a t e ·mpact resi stance UV, surface? e r ossi o n and hea
■F Rf 1 F as y i η s t. a 1 1 a L i. o n F: e ci υ ι r e s; o c c a. s i ο η a 1 s., u r f a c e
R e a d i 1. y a -/ a i 1 a b 1 e Hi gli thermal e x p a n s i o n -
c e n t r act i on
Ms* r- d t. o e· 1 i m i n a t e
U c- ν y a« ρ· ρ e a r a η c e c f
S υ. ρ e» r i o r r ca s. i. s t. a η c e t o UV Ver1 y hi gh t. h e r rr, a 1 e χ ρ a η s i. ο·
C liem i < at 1 1 y i n e r *■ s= σι a 1 .1 q u a n t i 11 e- s
Ηi gh IR t r a n s m i 1 1 a π c: e
'vol e : ί : on
ΑΡSORRER PLATE
1, 1 GENERAI. PROPERTIES OF' MET ALL. I C C OLLEC TOR'S FIATES FOR SOLAR
AIR HEATERS
v .3.1 A3 υ mi num p i a t e
1n m e n s ι o n s
R = 0.032 /mm
Advantages
p r o pi e r 1 y
L i mi t a t ι o n e
D amages, easily
Hue e eel 1 s of this pele yellow foam are primarily closed and
Advant ages
met a i b u ι 1 d i 11 g s
■ Fu ο · - ί d e z an airtight soai
L i m i t a t i ons:
154
E f f e c t i ν e 11 e s h i g h 1 y d ep e π d a π t α η i n s t a 1 1 a t i. ο η t e· c h η i q υ e s a η d
c o n d i t i ons
— Is a fire bararci if left exposed
— May expand when e x p t o s e d to air or moisture
— R value decreases some w h a t with age
— Comparatively high cost per R value
10.4 I N S U L A T I ON CHOI SE
F>f=!»R-r
D E S I G N OF T E S T I N G D E V I C E S
159
per c e n t age that doen't get 1 ost . Thus if the half of the enei gy-
o u t. ρ ut ( usable h es a t
E f f i c i e-r ι c ν ·-
Ι1·...·ι ι j r i f .ï ,;ji ieri and constructed a facility for the meassur eme-η I
c: o I 1 ec: t or s v s t e-m .
F>í£*R-r <Ä
C O S T I N G OF D I F F E R E N T S O L U T I O N S
163
t hi i s report.
a sper ι al f on] .
c:· f t h e: c a. I c u l a t i o i i .
giving bigger surface and i¡ is obvious that the system has not
glazing and frame? will be? macie with the use of EPD M seals. The
F ^ ^ R T 7"
C O N C L U S I O N S
167
13. CONCLUSIONS
plexiglas is: more expensive than glass. On the other side glass
e t i l 1 rir e r i .
Wa3 1 Rol year bonat e Sheets (DWPS), thinking that the higher cost
di rer t i ons.
n a t υ. ι - al col 1 e c t. o r d e s i g n i s a t. t e m p t e d :
The "prime mover" of the collector operation is solar
radiation. The order of magnitude of the available
insolation must not be o v e r s e e n . In general three? insolation
regions can be distinguished : The poor insolation region
(below 300W/m ) is c h a r a c t e r i z e d by not.ing 1 y low efficiency,
while region of medi urn (300W/m <H<800W/m > and high (above
800W/m ) insolation exhibit, s a t i s f a c t o r y performance.
F=>#^FÏ-r S
T A B L E S A N D F I G U R E S
171
I ALLE 7 . 1
PROPERTY VALUES OF COLLECTOR M ATERIALS USED
111 THE CALCULATIONS OF T H I S PROJECT
1. ADSORBER
Steel
2. GLAZING
PI ι t : <-
5o 1 ar r a d ι a t i ο η t r a. η s m i 1 1 a η c e 0 . 8 < 'J
Infrared -"- -"-- 0.02
Lea t e c L i v i t y O. IC.
E'm i e - i vi. t y O. 94
1
I hie-i mal coiiduf t i v i t y 1 , <■' W/m C
Tiii eh n e s s. 3mr,i
F'i e. ι t i l c-s
Bel. ai r a d i <-t i o n t r a n s m i t t a n c e 0 . 83
Ιηftared -"- -"- 0 . 03
Reflectivity 0.15
Emissivity 0.83
The?rmal conductivity O.lBSW/m °C
Tlui c k η e s s 3mm
172
I NSUL AT I ON
hi n e r a l wool
Τ h e? r m a 1 c: o n d u c t i v i t y O. O 3 8 W / m u
17 J
AF'FENO I Χ 1
M A T F L J Ai THICKNESS P
solar nolar IR IR [R
mm
F 1 uor 1, n a t e c i E t . h , 1 e n e
G l ass (0. 0 1 \ Fe?203l 4.8 0.91 0.014 0.01 0.14 0.85 0.811
:c I ar t r a n s m :i. 11. a η c e
soiar
η , = s: o l a r a b s cu· pi t; a π c: e
solar
T jp infrared transmittance
Ρ IR infrared r e f 1ersi a n c e
=:: i n t r a r e d e m i 11 aη c e
TP
APPENDIX
ARFE ND I Χ
SURFACE a* e* REF.
Νi c I e Ι Β1 a c 1 O ; i d e?s a n d Su 1 f i de?s
of Ni and Zn o n F'ol i s h e d Ni 0.91-0.94 0 . 11 1
Nickel Black on Galvanized Iron 0. 89 0.12-0.18 1
Nichel Black. 2 Layers on Electro
Plated Ni or, M i l d Steel 0.94 0.07
C u o u:< η Ν i M a cl e b y E1 e c t. r o d e p o s i t i o n
ctf Lu a n d S u b s e q u e n t Oxidation 0.81 0 . 17
Cc304 or, S i I v e i 0. 90 0 . 27
1
Γ ti o toi ι A l Ε'ν Spi e v i η q D ilute
Cu ( N03 ) 2 Se 1 ut. ι o n ori Hot
Al Fiate and Baking 0.93 0 . 11
Cu B l a c k ori Cu 0.89 0 . 17
Cuö on A n o d i r e d Al 0.85 0 . 11
Al203MoAl203MoAl203A1203
Interference Layers o n Mo 0„91 0.085
PhS C r y s t a l s, o n A] 0.89 0.20
APPENDIX 4
APPEND]>
LATER 1 AL E M I S S I VI T Y ( V. )
Asbestos
Board 96
Paper 94
Slate 96
Bri ek:
Glazed, rough E*5
Pi ree lay 85
Masonry - 94
F eri. r otto; · 90
tar bori, p u r i f. ed 80
Cement 54
C11 a r c: o a 1 , p o w ·. I e r 96
Cla\ , f i red 91
Enamel. 90
Lacquer 90
Fabric, asbestos; 78
Glass 92
j
Frost ed 96
Graphite, powder- 97
Gypsum 85
Ice 97
bacque r , bak e l i t e 93
Black, dull 97
Black, shiny (on m e t a l ) 87
White 87
Letmpbl a c k 96
Oil Paint, various colors: 94
F'apier, b lach:, sii i ny 90
178
Black, dull 94
White 90
F' o r1 <: e-1 a. i n , g l a z e d 92
Quarz 93
Rubber 95
Shellac, black, dull 91
Black, shiny, on tin plate 82
Snow 80
Tar Paper 92
Water 98
Wood, planed 85
PURE AND OXIDIZED METALS
A1 u m i. η u m , p o l i s h e d 5
Rough surface- 7
F ' o l i s h e?d 3
Eed, powder 93
Shi i n y Β
Me ι e u r y , pure ί0
Nickel, ori cast-iron
Fure, p o l i shed
F l a t i num. ρt tre, p o l i s h ed 8
Steel, galvanized 28
Ou ι d i ζ e d s t r o n g 1 y 88
Ro 1 1 e d f r e s t i 1 y 24
R o u g hi s u r f a c. e 96
Rusty, red 69
Sheet, nickel ptlated 1 1
Sheet. r o l 1 e?d 56
Τ ι r i . bur n i s h e d
T u n g s Ι eu u
7 ; ne , sheet 20
( Compiled by LT Industries—Ca,U.S.Α. )
180
APPENDIX 6
APPENDIX 7
AP PF. ND I X Ρ
Τ HERMAL CONDUCT 1 V I T V
MATERIAL W/mK
Al unii, η un: 221
St e o i 50
C oppi e-r 393
7 i nc 109
Asbestos o. :>5
184
APPENDIX 9
D.W.. 6,7,10 78 - 82 15 20
Aery1 i e Good
Shiee I s 3-6 89 0 71-93 25+ -44 3.9-7.8 optics
Acryl i c
Matter i a l s
Read ( a s s u m e d i f first
1 copi ) t e m p e r a t u r e p r o f i ] e
f o r o u t s i d e s u r f a c e of
α 1 a. 2. i n o .
C o m p u t e temp?, p r o f i l e f o r
i n s i d e s u r f a c e of g l a z i n q
U s i n g r e s u l t s of p r e v i o u s
s t a g e , compute t e m p e r a t u r e
p r o f i l e ? f or o u t s ι d e s o r f .
of g l a z i n g .
yes
Are» r e s u l t s f o r a l l three
no p r o f i l e s c l o s e enough t o
ρ r e ν· i o u s> c o m pt u t a l i ο η 7'
ves:
80
60
40
20
cm
—r-
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Ambient temperature 6 °C
Room temperature 18 C
FIG. 7.1 Temperature variation along the surface of a solar absorber for various
insolation values.
1 and 2
1 Glazing : Glass
Insulation thickness : 3mm
2 Glazing : Plexiglas
Absorber-to-glazing distance 20cm
η (efficiency)
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
H(W/m2)
—ι— —ι—
600 800 100(
200 400
100 Ambient temperature 6 C
Room temperature 18 C
FIG. 7.2 Collector efficiency vs. insolation for a glass and a plexiglas glazed collector.
1, 2, 3
1 Insulation t hickness 1cm
2 Insulat ion t hickness 3cm Glazing : Plexiglas
3 Insulat ion t hickness 4cm Absorber-to-glazing distance : 20cm
η (efficiency)
0.50 ■
0.40
0.30
0j20
0.10 -
H(W/m2)
—ι—
200 400 600 800 1000
100 Ambient temperature 6 C
Room temperature 18 °C
FIG. 7.3 Collect or efficiency vs. insolation wit h varying insulat ion t hickness.
1 and 2
1 Absorber-to-glazing distance : 15cm Glazing : Plexiglas
2 Absorber-to-glazing distance : 20cm Insulation thickness : 1cm
η (efficiency)
0.50 -
0.40 -
0.30 "
00
\0
0.20
0.10 -
H(W/nr*)
—ι—
400 800 1000
200 600
FIG. 7.4 Collector efficiency vs. insolation for 15cm and 20cm absorber-to-glazing distance.
-*ε_
F=
o
li e } $ ^ % .^ît'î^fi*»■■:.·?■ '
-S
¿.ut.«1 .-α >£*».... .. : .
«;..:~--;u..
PTSu^'X'ch.: : ··,Γ>-·*Ι,-if*·*' 1 -
^ r ^ ïtó'^^uürv,!^·;,": '
WååEålm^Æ?^'· '
UN ΙvEPSI ΓΤ SCALE 11.15
C0N1RACT N! ESi-PS
THessALCwfKi
I56CBIÍ1
.[■UNI
i i=z
RfS"ONSrB.E
p«cf
» . W ""OOPOUOS
IIRMC « 1
f
—1
192
TESTING ASSEMBLY
u !J
- I/ \ ι <
ί ^_V
1 g
■<
3 *
immjjjiSimiuuiiiiiiiii^
AIR TOA»
HEAT C X&HANOE«
Ti, SENSOR
imEis^iis^ininiiiin.
SH
Ih
!©Î
ï
=
F
I
::
'tt'PON'JBI.E
tttGF ORMO Ni 1
t ^-»rrpn^qs.
I
1
T., SENSOR
CDNA102013AC