4294-Article Text-11969-1-10-20150330
4294-Article Text-11969-1-10-20150330
Teknologi
Received: 5 September 2014 This paper aims to examine the effect of replacing the natural aggregate with waste tyrerubber granules.
Received in revised form: Waste tyrerubber granules were used as aggretate replacement in the pavingblock at four different
3 December 2014 percentage: 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%. The paving blocks were tested in terms of their strength and the
Accepted 3 January 2015 characteristics of their microstructure by measuring compressive strength, flexural strength, splitting tensile
strength, and skid resistance. Field scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and Fourier Transform Infra-
Graphical abstract Red(FTIR) analysis werecarried out on the paving block specimen. When 10% of the natural aggregate was
replaced with waste tyrerubber granules, there was no substantial difference in the compressive strength
but the flexural and splitting tensile strength increased to a certain extent. When more than 20% of waste
tyrerubber granulesis incorporated in the paving blocks, the strength is acutely reduced even though there
is a growth in ductility. The results proved that even after failure, the paving blocks did not shatter but still
stayed imperforated. Double layer rubberized concrete paving blocks (DL-RCPBs) are more flexible and
soft to the surface, and thus provide a better ride quality. This characteristic makes it suitable for trafficked
roads. DL-RCPBs (30% and 40%) with low strength characteristics could be used on roads that not required
high strength and may be viable for other applications, depending on the percentage of waste tyre rubber
used. DL-RCPB with higher waste tyre rubber content exhibit higher skid resistance especially on dry
surface but reduced on slippery surface. Two main factors that influence the skid resistance are high
elasticity and rough surface texture of waste tyre rubber. It is suggested that DL-RCPBs could be introduced
as one of alternative concrete paving block (CPB) that can be used in paving application.
2.0 EXPERIMENTAL
2.1 Materials 80 mm
Series I (C:A:S) Series II (C:A:S) Series I&II Series I&II Series I&II
CCPB 1: 1.7: 1.5 1: 1.7: 1.5 0
DL-RCPB (10 %) 1: 1.5: 1.5 1: 1.7: 1.35 10
DL-RCPB (20 %) 1: 1.35: 1.5 1: 1.7: 1.2 489 0.47 20
DL-RCPB (30 %) 1: 1.2: 1.5 1: 1.7: 1.05 30
DL-RCPB (40 %) 1: 1.0: 1.5 1: 1.7: 0.9 40
The Tinius Olsen Universal testing machine with a loading rate of A British Pendulum illustrated in Figure5(a) was used in
0.40 mm/min was used to test the splitting tensile strength. The accordance to BS EN 1338 [14] to evaluate the skid resistance. A
specimen’s length and thickness was measured five times and then slider with a length of 126 ± 1 mm was placed on the block surface.
the average of the measurements was calculated before the air- The surfaces of the specimen and the slider were lubricated with
cured specimens were tested. Two rigid bearers with contact water without removing the slider from its arranged position. The
surfaces of a 75mm radius, and two plywood bearing strips with the pendulum arm and pointer were placed horizontally and then
width of 15 mm, thickness of 3 mm, and length of 230 mm were released using the release mechanism. At the initial stage of the
also used as the specimen was centered on the plywood strips return swing, the pendulum arm was caught and the position of the
(Figure 4). A plywood strip was placed on the specimen before pointer on the scale was recorded to the nearest whole number. The
being loaded according to the British Standard test method, BS EN lifting handle was used to raise the slider to return the pendulum
1338 [14]. arm to its original position. Before releasing the pendulum again,
the surface and the slider were relubricated with water. Each
surface was assessed five times with the pendulum, as shown in
Figure5(b).
a)
3 mm plywood strip
Waste tyrerubber that were in powder form were analyzed with the
PerkinElmer Spectrum 100 FT-IR spectrometer. 100 mg of
Potassium bromide was used for every mg of the sample during the
FTIR analysis with the spectrometer. A total of 32 scans were
collected from 4000 to 650 cm-1 at 32 cm-1resolutions and averaged. Figure 5 (a) British pendulum (b) Skid resistance test
88 Euniza Jusli et al. / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 73:4 (2015) 85–90
Modulus of Rupture, σ
3.1 Compressive Strength 9.5
9.0 28 days
As shown in Figure6, the amount of replaced aggregate is inversely 8.5
(MPa)
proportionate to the compressive strength of the block; as the 8.0
7.5
amount of coarse or fine mineral aggregate increases, the
7.0
compressive strength of the block decreases. Each value displays
6.5
the mean of five measurements. Generally, the blocks with a 10%
6.0
waste tyrerubber content fulfilled the requirement in BS EN
5.5
1338for the 28-day compressive strength test, which is not less
5.0
than 40 MPa for paving blocks of 80 mm thickness to carry traffic
0 10 20 30 40
load. This could be due to the minimal percentage of rubber content Rubber Granule, RG (%)
in the CPB.At the 28th day, the compressive strength of the 10%,
20%, 30%, and 40%DL-RCPB were 46 MPa, 43 MPa, 37 MPa, and Figure 7 Modulus of rupture of DL-CPBs containing waste tyre
29 MPa, respectively. This indicate that the weak interfacial bond
between the rubber and cement mortar due to the hydrophobic
900 28 days
nature of rubber was the main factor of the reduction in strength
45 300
28 days
200
40 100
0
35
0 10 20 30 40
30 Rubber Granule, RG (%)
5.5
Splitting Tensile Strength, T (MPa) T = -0.0005RG2 - 0.0243RG + 5.0394 7 days
5.0 R² = 0.9897
28 days
4.5
4.0
3.5
2.0
0 10 20 30 40
Rubber Granule, RG (%)
Figure 9 Splitting tensile strength of DL-RCPBs Figure 12 Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX)
Transmittance (%)
analysis as shown in Figure12. The main elements present were 99.6
carbon, silicon, aluminum, and calcium. The rough and non
uniform surface of the waste rubber particle was observed in Figure 99.4
11.It was found the rough surface of waste tyre rubber was not fully
covered by cement paste which results in lack interaction bonding 99.2
between tyre particle and cement. Voids also can be observed in
Figure 11, due to the hydrophobic nature of rubber that repel water 99
and results in voids once the concrete was hardened. 98.8
4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500
Wavenumbers (cm-1)
Cement Paste Void
References
95
British Pendulum Number (BPN) [1] Batayneh, M. K., Marie, I. and Asi, I. 2008. Promoting the use of crumb
90
rubber concrete in developing countries. Waste Management. 28: 2171–
85 BPN = 0.135RG + 84.86 2176.
Dry Surface [2] Manaf, L. A., Samah, M. A. A. and Zukki, N. I. M. 2009. Municipal solid
80 R² = 0.9813
waste management in Malaysia: practices and challenges. Waste
Wet Surface Management. 29: 2902–2906.
75
[3] Shu, X. and Huang, B. 2013. Recycling of waste tire rubber in asphalt and
70 portland cement concrete : An overview. Construction and Building
BPN = -0.265RG + 76.1 Materials.
65 R² = 0.9989 [4] Ling, T. C., Nor, H. M. and Lim, S. K. 2010. Using recycled waste tyres
60 in concrete paving blocks. Institution of Civil Engineers. Institure of Civil
0 10 20 30 40 Engineers: 37–45.
[5] Euniza, J., Hasanan, M. N., Ramadhansyah, P. J. and Zaiton, H. 2014.
Rubber Granule, RG (%) Double Layer Concrete Paving Blocks Using Waste Tyre Rubber as
Aggregate Replacement. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 554: 128–132.
[6] Khatib, Z. K. and Bayomy, F. M. 1999. Rubberized portland cement
Figure 14 Skid resistance of DL-RCPBs concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 11(3): 206–213.
[7] Ganjian, E., Khorami, M. and Maghsoudi, A. A. 2009. Scrap-tyre-rubber
replacement for aggregate and filler in concrete. Construction and
Building Materials. 23: 1828–1836.
4.0 CONCLUSION [8] Khaloo, A. R., Dehestani, M. and Rahmatabadi, P. 2008. Mechanical
properties of concrete containing a high volume of tire–rubber particles.
This study illustrate the results for the effect of using waste tyre Waste Management. 28: 2472–2482.
[9] Sukontasukkul, P. And Chaikaew, C. 2006. Properties of concrete
rubber granules as an aggregate replacement on the microstructure,
pedestrian block mixed with crumb rubber. Construction and Building
compressive strength, flexural strength, splitting tensile strength Materials. 20: 450–457.
and skid resistance of double layer rubberized concrete paving [10] Li, G., Stubblefield, M. A., Garrick, G., Eggers, J., Abadie, C. and Huang,
blocks. The effects on the compressive strengthof DL-RCPB are B. 2004. Development of waste tire modified concrete. Cement and
dependent on the percentage of rubber content. For trafficked Concrete Research. 34: 2283–2289.
[11] Euniza, J., Hasanan, M. N., Ramadhansyah, P. J. and Zaiton, H. 2014b.
pavement application, it is suggested that the percentage of waste
Mechanical Properties of Double Layer Rubberized Concrete Paving
tyrerubber should not exceed 20 %. However, substitution of waste Blocks. Advanced Materials Research. 911: 463–467.
tyre rubber up to 30 % can be considered since all sample meets the [12] American Society for Testing and Materials 2013. Standard Specification
standard requiment forflexural and splitting tensile strength. DL- for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete. American Society for Testing and
RCPBs are more flexible and soft to the surface, and thus provide Materials. United States: ASTM C494-13.
[13] Euniza, J., Hasanan, M. N., Ramadhansyah, P. J. and Zaiton, H. 2014a.
a better ride quality. On the other hand, DL-RCPBs (30 % and 40%)
Chemical Properties of Waste Tyre Rubber Granules. Advanced Materials
with low strength characteristics could be used on roads that not Research. 911: 77–81.
required high strength and may be viable for other applications, [14] British European Standard 2003. Concrete paving blocks — Requirements
depending on the percentage of waste tyre rubber used. DL-RCPB and test methods. British European Standard. British Standard Institution,
with higher waste tyre rubber content exhibit higher skid resistance UK: BS EN 1338 Part 3.
especially on dry surface but reduced on slippery surface. DL- [15] Ling, T. C. and Nor, H. 2007. Properties of Crumb Rubber Concrete
Paving Blocks with and without Facing Layer. Persidangan Kebangsaan
RCPB has a higher skid resistance than CCPB because of two main AWAM (pp. 1–5). Pulau Langkawi, Malaysia.
factors: high elasticity and rough surface texture.This may not give [16] Topcu, I. B. 1995. The properties of rubberized concrete. Cement and
much effect since CCPB and DL-RCPBs meets the minimum Concrete Research. 25(2): 304–310.
requirement in standard. Hence, it is suggested that DL-RCPBs [17] Ling, T. C., Nor, H. M. and Hainin, M. R. (2009). Properties of concrete
paving blocks incorporating crumb rubber and SBR latex. Road Mater
could be introduced as one of alternative CPB that can be used in
Pave Des. 10(1): 213–222.
paving application. [18] Ling, T. C., Hainin, M.R. and Ming, F. C. 2006. Highway Accelerated
Loading Instrument (HALI) For Concrete Block Pavement.
[19] Azman, M., Nor, H. M., Hainin, M. R., Yaacob, H., Ismail, C. R. and Nur
Acknowledgement Hafizah, A. K. 2013. The Effect of Groove–Underside Shaped Concrete
Block on Pavement Permanent Deformation. Jurnal Teknologi. 61(3).
[20] Azman, M., Hasanan, M. N., Hainin, M. R. and Hafizah, N. A. K. 2014.
The authors would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Higher Effective Thickness of Bedding Sand Layer for Shell Groove-Underside
Education (MOHE) of Malaysia for their support and Universiti Shaped Concrete Blocks for Pavement. Jurnal Teknologi. 70(4).
Teknologi Malaysia Research for the grant (Vot.03H47) to fund [21] Concrete Masonry Association of Australia 1997. Concrete Segmental
this research study. Pavements. Concrete Masonry Association of Australia, CMAA T44.
[22] Fernández-Berridi, M. J., González, N., Mugica, A. and Bernicot, C. 2006.
Pyrolysis-FTIR and TGA techniques as tools in the characterization of
blends of natural rubber and SBR. Thermochimica Acta. 444: 65–70