Criminal Law Reviewer
Criminal Law Reviewer
A penal law, as defined by this Court, is an act of the legislature that prohibits certain
acts and establishes penalties for its violations. It also defines crime, treats of its nature
and provides for its punishment. (Oh vs. CA, 403 SCRA 300 (2003))
Penal Laws:
Penal laws, on the other hand, strictly and properly are those imposing punishment for
an offense committed against the state which the executive of the state has the power to
pardon. In other words, a penal law denotes punishment imposed and enforced by the
state for a crime or offense against its law (JOSE D. FILOTEO, JR. vs.
SANDIGANBAYAN and THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES)
No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor
shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws. (Section 1, Article 3 of
the 1987 Constitution)
Article III, section 1 (11) of the Constitution states that "No bill of attainder or ex post
facto law shall be enacted." A bill of attainder is a legislative act which inflicts
punishment without trial. Its essence is the substitution of a legislative for a judicial
determination of guilt. The constitutional ban against bills of attainder serves to
implement the principle of separation of powers by confining legislatures to rule-making
and thereby forestalling legislative usurpation of the judicial function. (Bureau of
Customs Employees Association (BOCEA) vs. Teves, G.R. No. 181704
December 6, 2011)
No ex post facto law or bill of attainder shall be enacted (Article III, section 22 of the
Constitution)
Theories of Crime
Classical Theory
o classical theory on which our penal code is mainly based, the basis of criminal
liability is human free Will. Man is essentially a moral creature with an absolutely
free will to choose between good and evil. When he commits a felonious or
criminal act (delito doloso), the act is presumed to have been done voluntarily,
i.e., with freedom, intelligence, and intent. Man, therefore, should be adjudged or
held accountable for wrongful acts so long as free will appears unimpaired.
(People vs. Estrada, G.R. No. 130487, June 19, 2000)
Positivist Theory
o The positivist theory states that the basis for criminal liability is the sum total of
the social and economic phenomena to which the offense is expressed. The
adoption of the aspects of the theory is exemplified by the indeterminate sentence
law. (De Joya vs. The Jail Warden of Batangas City, G.R. Nos.
159418-19, December 10, 2003)
Positivist Theory
Equipoise Rule
When two antithetical interpretations may be inferred from the circumstantial evidence
presented, the situation calls for the application of the equipoise rule - i.e., when the evidence is
consistent with a finding of innocence and also compatible with a finding of guilt, then the
evidence is at equipoise and does not fulfill the test of moral certainty sufficient to support a
conviction (People vs. Poras, 612 SCRA 624, G.R. No. 177747 February 16, 2010)
The equipoise rule finds application if, as in this case, the inculpatory facts and
circumstances are capable of two or more explanations, one of which is consistent with the
innocence of the accused and the other consistent with his guilt, for then the evidence does not
fulfill the test of moral certainty, and does not suffice to produce a conviction (Abarquez vs.
People, 479 SCRA 225, G.R. No. 150762 January 20, 2006)
Prospective
o