The document discusses four key socialization processes that influence a child's learning of gender identity: 1) Manipulation - how infants are physically handled differently based on sex, 2) Canalization - directing children to gender-appropriate toys, 3) Verbal appellation - telling children what is expected of their gender, and 4) Activity exposure - familiarizing children with gender-appropriate tasks like housework. It also examines how institutions like education, media, religion, and language reinforce gender stereotypes and norms in society.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
255 views24 pages
Chapter 1 Lesson 4 Gender and Socialization
The document discusses four key socialization processes that influence a child's learning of gender identity: 1) Manipulation - how infants are physically handled differently based on sex, 2) Canalization - directing children to gender-appropriate toys, 3) Verbal appellation - telling children what is expected of their gender, and 4) Activity exposure - familiarizing children with gender-appropriate tasks like housework. It also examines how institutions like education, media, religion, and language reinforce gender stereotypes and norms in society.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24
socialization mechanisms that
maintain gender in our society.
Manipulation Verbal Appellation Canalization Activity Exposure "Gendering," or the socialization of persons into a given gender, begins the moment a child is born. Almost the first thing people want to know about a baby is: "Boy or girl?" Hospitals and middle- class parents emphasize the difference, between dressing girl babies in pink and boy babies in blue, and friends' and relatives' responses to the baby take their cue from this color code. notes four processes involved in a child's learning of gender identity. In most cases these processes are performed unconsciously by those nearest the child: they are seen as “natural" reactions to the child's sex. The child, too, learns from them unconsciously, and the learning is all the more powerful for this. 1. The first process, manipulation simply means that people handle girls and boys differently, even as infants. One study in the West, for instance, showed that a sample of mothers tended to use more physical and visual stimulation on male infants, and more verbal stimulation on female infants. In our own experience, we might notice that boy babies are tossed into the air more often than girl babies, who get more delicate handling. 2. The second process, canalization means that people direct children's' attention to gender-appropriate objects. The most common example of this is the choice of toys. Little boys are given war toys, cars, and machines that they can take apart or put together; little girls are given dolls, tea sets, and toy houses. These toys teach children early on what their prescribed roles in life will be and serve to familiarize them with the tools of their trade. 3. The third process, verbal appellation, consists in telling children what they are (e.g., "brave boy" or "pretty girl") or what is expected of them ("Boys don't cry," "Girls don't hit their playmates," "Boys don't hit girls [but other boys are fair game]"). The fourth process, activity exposure ensures that children are familiarized with gender-appropriate tasks: for instance, in our culture, girls are expected and encouraged to help their mothers with housework and the care of younger siblings, while their brothers are encouraged to play or work outside the home. 4. ACTIVITY EXPOSURE
The fourth process, activity exposure ensures
that children are familiarized with gender- appropriate tasks: for instance, in our culture, girls are expected and encouraged to help their mothers with housework and the care of younger siblings, while their brothers are encouraged to play or work outside the home. This series of processes enables children to identify which gender their parents think they should belong to, and to acquire the corresponding behavior and roles. Quite early, before the age of three, children develop a clear and often irreversible gender identity; and this is reinforced through their identification with parents of the same sex, as well as through later interaction with children with the same gender identity. Institutions of mass socialization -those which aim to ensure that whole groups of people consent to and fit into the existing social order -also play an important role in promoting the dominant gender ideology and inequality. In our contemporary society, four institutions are crucial: formal education, the mass media, religion, and language. The education system itself is authoritarian in orientation, with learning occurring largely as a transfer of knowledge from teacher to student. Discipline and obedience are important com- ponents in this pseudo-learning process. Thus, girls' superior performance might be at least partly attributable to their greater propensity for passive behavior which teachers consider right conduct. Sex-segregated schools, or exclusive s.chools as they are euphemistically called, are the rule for the upper classes; these are mostly run by religious congregations. The principle behind sex-segregated schools is that women and men have different roles in life, therefore the education they require is different. Another philosophy behind · sex segregation in education, though less openly admitted, is that females and males must be protected from each other until they are of marriageable age. (One graduate of a sex-segregated school notes, however, that segregation may in fact work for female students to a certain extent, since it removes them from exposure to discrimination and the pressure to underachieve in order to be less threatening to male classmates). Schools and teachers also channel boys and girls towards gender-appropriate behavior and activities. High schools used to teach boys carpentry and electronics, and girls, cooking, typing and child care. The content of textbooks and visual aids reinforces gender stereotypes, with females portrayed primarily as mothers and well-behaved little girls, and males primarily as workers and adventurous little boys. No wonder then that in tertiary institutions, girls opt for training that suits their perceived roles and characteristics as women - such as secretarial courses, nursing, and education - while boys choose more technical courses such as engineering. Print media (newspapers, magazines, komiks), broadcast media (radio and television) and films carry the same gender stereotypes as school textbooks, and more. A recent study on the images of women in mass media found that women in magazines, comic books, radio and television dramas, and films are shown as housewives or worse, emotionally dependent martyrs and victims or scheming and sly villainesses. The usual goal of both good and bad women alike is to catch or keep a man, and whole plots revolve around how this goal is frustrated or achieved. Men have more positive images: they are shown as courageous, principled, determined, and assertive; but they are also portrayed as violent and destructive. Advertising uses gender imagery to get people to buy products; in so doing, it also convinces people to buy the prevalent gender ideology. They also appear as sexy come-ons to specific male-oriented products, such as alcoholic drinks and cigarettes. Males are shown engaged in sports, professions, wars, camaraderie with other men, or the conquest of women. As earlier mentioned, most dominant religions teach that gender differentiation and inequality are ordained by God. This teaching is conveyed not just in doctrine or in a male-dominated religious hierarchy, but also in sacred symbolism. Language is perhaps the most subtle and pervasive institution of socialization, since we use it everyday, not just in communicating but in the very act of thinking. It is a primary mediator in our relationship with the world. Thus, sexist language is a powerful tool for the maintenance of gender ideology. The English language, which has gendered nouns and pronouns, is a case in point: it uses the word "man" to refer to humankind, and the pronoun "he" to any abstract individual. Most Filipino languages are more fortunate in that these do not have gendered pronoun or terms for many_ positions: asawa may refer to a male or female spouse, kapatid to a male or female sibling. However, they do have terms which perpetuate gender stereotypes: maybahay ("the one who has the house"), for instance, means a wife, never a husband. Like the English language, Filipino languages also use phrases which denigrate women: "no balls" has its own equivalent (walang bayag); competition is described as "seeing who can piss higher" (pataasan ng ihi), a feat for which women are not physically equipped; a wife who knows nothing a_bout housework is contemptuously branded a "pussy-wife" (asawang-puki), as though her sole value to her husband resided in her genitals.