Approaches and Strategies in Teaching PH
Approaches and Strategies in Teaching PH
Abstract
This study evaluates the approaches and strategies employed by Bukidnon State
University instructors in teaching Philippine Literature. The study is anchored on the
concept that successful literature teaching requires the use of different approaches and
classroom activities or strategies. The results of the study revealed that instructors
preferred personal-response approach and paraphrastic approach in the teaching of
Philippine Literature. The study further showed that the strategies instructors used are
Introduction
Teachers aspire to have all of their students mismatch between the approach and strategies
used by Philippine Literature instructors can be
students’ time with them will not be wasted. observed in literature classes. For example, a
Teachers desire to teach prompt them to look teacher wants to emphasize the social or moral
for approaches and strategies which will best issues embedded in the text but uses more
language activities instead. Another observation
is on the students’ dislike or disinterest in
approaches to the variety of teaching strategies. their literature classes including Philippine
On one hand, teachers need to understand the Literature class. Students’ dislike could be
learning styles of their students for them to be a result of the approach the teacher used in
able to match their teaching approach to that of class or perhaps the strategies employed by the
the students’ approach in learning. On the other teachers are not that creative. The link among
hand, the teachers also need to understand that and between these approaches, strategies and
their teaching approaches should also match students’ interest is imperative for students to
their teaching strategies, which we will refer to understand and appreciate literature.
as classroom activities in this study. The observations mentioned above
One of the many issues literature teachers prompted the researcher to conduct the study.
face today is in the use of approach in teaching It would be of great value and interest if one
literary pieces. It has been observed that knows the approaches and strategies used by
instructors of Philippine Literature in Bukidnon Philippine literature instructors. The success
State University (BSU) are using one common of the teaching and learning process depends
traditional approach in teaching, the Read- mostly on what goes on between the people
and-Discuss approach which focuses more inside the classroom. Since the ultimate
on the personal responses of the students. A goal of education is to make students learn,
Volume 11 2014
84 Typology of Bukidnon State University
it is, therefore imperative that the teaching different approach. This approach focuses on
approaches and strategies should serve this the responses of the students to the text. The
purpose. students in this approach are encouraged to
read by making connections with the meaning
Conceptual Framework of the text.Last is the moral-philosophical
approach. This is an approach that includes the
This study is anchored on the concept teaching of moral values. Students discover
that literature teaching should incorporate the moral values while reading the literary text.
teaching of culture and language and should The understanding and appreciation of
improve the critical thinking skills of students literature are both important in the learning
by using varied literature teaching approaches of literature. Aside from this, understanding
and strategies (Capello 2011). Literary texts the language used in the literary texts is also
according to Capello can be used to help readers important. In learning Philippine Literature,
understand other cultures and at the same for example, it is critical that students don’t just
time help develop the language competence regard the literary pieces as ordinary reading
texts, but students should understand the
(1991) who claims that literature is an agent underlying principle of learning these literary
for teaching students to learn and appreciate texts. Also, students need to understand the
the culture of other people. Literature is also language used in the literary texts for them to
a vehicle for students to learn and develop a be able to understand better these texts as well
particular language. Literature helps readers as develop language competence. For instance,
value culture while expanding their horizon. one lesson can be taught by incorporating
If taught effectively, literature helps build language and literature activities as well as
vocabulary, helps improve writing skills and activities to help students understand different
also develops critical thinking skills. cultures.
There are several ways to teach literature to Davis and Florian (2004) asserts that a
students that will help develop their cognitive, combination of approaches is more effective
as well as affective skills and at the same time in facilitating positive social, emotional and
help improve their performance in using a behavioral outcomes of a learner than using
language. Carter and Long (1991) presented a single approach. In addition, the use of
different approaches in teaching literature that integrated approaches according to Corpuz
involve the cognitive and affective aspects of
learning. One approach is the language-based using each approach in different settings. Also,
approach. This approach focuses on language Pieper (2006) postulates that a balance between
learning through literary texts. Students in the canonical and learner-centered approaches
this approach are exposed to literary texts that will allow students to learn and enjoy literature.
use the target language to be learnt. Another Rashid (2009) asserts that the teacher’s
approach is the paraphrastic approach that
deals with the apparent meaning of the text. strategies the teacher will use. Arends (2001)
For students to understand especially the states that a particular strategy can affect
students’ motivation to learn. If the objective of
simple words. Information-based approach teaching literature is to help students appreciate
is another one. This approach involves the literary concepts and pieces as much as to help
teaching of literature concepts. Students in this develop the literary and language competence
approach are expected to make use of literature of the students, the approaches and strategies
knowledge in their reading and writing of
literature. Personal-response approach is a
The Bukidnon State University Research Journal
Grenna Marie Joy P. Simene 85
Review of Literature grammar and structure of the language. In
this approach, the strategies used for language
The aim of education is to develop an teaching is most appropriate.
individual holistically. Aquino (2003) mentions Salandanan (2005) stresses that for
that developing an individual’s cognitive, learning to be effective, an approach should
affective and psychomotor skills should be the incorporate different strategies. “It is a short-
focus of any educational institution. In teaching ranged way applied in education and is resorted
literature subjects, for example, a teacher to on a day when the topic to be studied lends
should not only concentrate on developing best to a planned “tactic”” (Salandanan, 2005).
the affective ability of the students, but also Strategies or teaching strategies in this study
the cognitive and psychomotor skills. The
teacher’s choice of the approach will assure that carried out the framework used or followed by
the student’s holistic development is achieved. the Literature teacher.
Providing opportunities for a literature student Hwang and Embi (2007) say that an
to learn not only the language of other people,
but also the lives of other people is important. Further, the plans or activities according to
And this can be done if teachers will use varied them should motivate students to learn. In BSU,
teaching approaches. the use of approaches and strategies to teaching
A teaching approach according to Philippine Literature is geared towards the
Salandanan (2005) is a “procedure that student’s awareness and understanding of the
employs a variety of strategies to access better artistic elements and the culture of the different
understanding and effective learning.” In the Philippine literary texts. In fact, the core values
context of this study, a teaching approach is of peace and education have been incorporated
in the course to ascertain that students will have
by the teacher to deliver the activities in the the thematic and intercultural knowledge after
Literature class. taking the course. In addition, to determine that
There are three most common approaches students will not be denied in the development of
to teaching literature according to Carter and their cognitive skills, instructors are encouraged
Long as cited by Ghazali (2009). One is the to utilize approaches and strategies that will
cultural approach that aims at developing the help develop students’ critical thinking skills.
linguistic and experiential knowledge of the The use of many approaches and strategies is
students through understanding the socio- paramount since the course design leads to the
cultural aspects of the text. Literary texts in different levels of complexity that call for the
this approach are considered as a cultural use of both cognitive and affective skills of the
artifact that students could use in developing students. However, since most students are not
their literary skills. Another approach is the literary ready, instructors deliver their lessons
personal growth approach which encourages by touching only the affective skills of the
students to give their opinions based on their students. The question, how far the approaches
experiences and based on the text. The literary of the teacher help students develop their
texts are used as a stimulus for personal affective and cognitive skills, is very crucial.
growth activities. The strategies that suit best Research has shown that the use of both
this approach are those activities that involve cognitive and affective strategies in teaching
cooperation among group members. The third is most effective in student’s learning. Aquino
approach is the language-based approach which (2003) cites different researchers who use cog-
enables students to use and study literary text in nitive strategies in the classroom. Among the
a systematic and methodical way. The text in strategies mentioned are using graphic orga-
this approach is used as a means of analyzing nizers, brainstorming, predicting, summariz-
Volume 11 2014
86 Typology of Bukidnon State University
Al-Marooqui (2012) produced a similar result. able to understand the teaching approaches and
Kellem’s (2009) study on the use of reader- strategies used by their Philippine Literature
response approach combined with a stylistics instructors. The curriculum designers will also
approach suggested that the integrated approach
to teaching literature should be observed. The be a basis for them to redesign the Philippine
study showed that it was effective for literature Literature syllabus. Finally, the result of the
studies at advanced English for Foreign Language
levels. It is within the context mentioned above have a basis for planning in-service trainings
that this research found its place. for Philippine Literature teachers in relation to
the appropriate use of teaching approaches and
strategies.
The Bukidnon State University Research Journal
Grenna Marie Joy P. Simene 87
Research design of the same academic year. The student
participants were randomly selected from the
The study is a descriptive study where many Philippine Literature classes of the six
both quantitative and qualitative data are teachers. All the participants were informed
collected and analyzed. The study used of the purpose of the study through written
triangulation whereby interview, questionnaire, and verbal communication before they were
and classroom observation were used to answer formally taken in as respondents.
the research questions.
This study was limited to the approaches Research Instruments
and strategies in teaching Philippine Literature
employed by six instructors of Bukidnon State The two sets of questionnaires were
University who were handling more than one
Philippine Literature class during the second
semester of the academic year 2011-2012. Fifty to the teachers who taught Philippine Literature.
percent of the total population of Philippine This questionnaire consists of Yes-No items
Literature students was also used as participants followed by ‘why’ question items and one open-
of the study.The consent of the instructors and ended question item which allowed participants
the students who served as participants were to express their opinion and suggestions on
sought through a formal written letter noted and matters related to the research topic. Another
signed by the Language and Letters department set of questionnaire was distributed to the
chairperson. students of the teacher respondents to get their
feedback on the approaches and strategies
by Carter and Long (1991) based on their three employed by the teacher. This survey material
models in teaching literature were used. The contains open-ended questions that are based
approaches are the language-based, paraphrastic, on the teacher-participants’ questionnaire. Part
information-based, personal response, and I open-ended question is “What other teaching
moral-philosophical approaches. approaches do you use in your Philippine
Data collection and information were based Literature class?” Part II open-ended question
is “What other teaching strategies do you use in
The questionnaire served as the primary your Philippine Literature class?”
instrument and classroom observation and semi- A checklist adapted from Rashid,
structured interview as secondary instruments. Vethamani and Rahman (2010) was used during
Further, only one class session per instructor the class observations. The checklist has seven
was observed, and the interview sessions for columns that documented the literature teaching
each instructor did not last for 30 minutes due to approaches and strategies used and how often
time constraints. the approaches and strategies were used. The
checklist was then summarized, compared and
Participants of the Study interpreted to identify the primary approach
and strategies utilized by each teacher.
All the instructors who taught Philippine To verify the responses classroom
Literature in the second semester of the observations were conducted and semi-
academic year 2011-2012 were purposively structured interviews were also done.The
taken as participants of the study since there classroom observations helped in the analysis
are only few instructors handling Philippine of the data coming from the results of the two
Literature classes. Another group of participants questionnaires. The information from the
classes observed as well as from the interview
Philippine Literature in the second semester conducted allowed the researcher to describe
Volume 11 2014
88 Typology of Bukidnon State University
Results and Discussions give the meaning of these words. In fact, the
teachers allocated almost 10 to 15 minutes for
this kind of activity.
teaching approaches indicated in the question- It was also observed that all teachers used
naire, and the language-based approach is sel- the information-based approach (IBA). Some
dom used by the instructors while personal re- used it before reading the text while others used
sponse and paraphrastic approaches are nearly it after reading the text. The giving and, or asking
always employed by the instructors. Table 1 of information about the text are given a little
below shows the rank of approaches according attention by most teachers. As mentioned by
to the frequency of their use. these teachers during the interview, IBA is given
a little emphasis because students are assumed
to have already learned this before they enter the
class. But based on the classroom observation,
one teacher emphasized the literary conventions
needed for the students to understand the text.
This teacher gave considerable input on the
elements focused on the text before the students
were asked about their understanding of the text.
According to the teacher, many of her students
have no idea about the basic elements of
Creating language awareness among literature that when asked what they understand
literature students is not the primary concern about a particular part, her students could not
of the literature teachers as mentioned by the answer. That is her main reason IBA is given
instructors in the interview. According to them, importance in her class.
although they nearly always use paraphrase or In comparison to the approaches always
let students paraphrase lines from the text, they employed by the teachers, moral-philosophical
do not really intend to teach them the language approach (MPA) is only 4th in rank. The
structure. The teachers only want to simplify the result means that teachers prefer to use the
texts so that students will quickly understand other approaches, although they also employ
the texts. One teacher said, “I do not use strategies/classroom activities under this
language-based approach (LBA) because this approach. When asked why they don’t always
The Bukidnon State University Research Journal
Grenna Marie Joy P. Simene 89
use this approach, teachers’ answers point 1. The result is interesting to note since this
to the appropriateness of the text. For them, implies that although instructors often use PA,
there are texts that do not emphasize the moral they do not necessarily paraphrase the text
values, but when texts contain moral values, for the students to read, nor solely rely on the
they employ the MPA. paraphrased version of the text. Instructors’
Table 2 presents the strategies/classroom way of using the PA is through re-telling the
activities employed by Philippine Literature text to the students and explaining to them the
instructors. From the table, it is seen that the text using simple words as items 12 and 13
strategy/classroom activity, “I guide students have shown.
to relate the themes to personal experiences.” Items 5 and 6 in the same table demonstrate
got the highest mean. This result supports that strategies/classroom activities geared
the ranking of the approaches found in Table towards language teaching are seldom used
1. The result means that the teachers’ use of by the instructors as these received the second
the strategy/classroom activity is appropriate lowest mean and the second to the last rank.
to the personal-response approach they use in
class. However, one data from Table 2 does shown in Table 1 which tells us that the LBA
is ranked lowest by the instructors when it
in Table 1. The strategy/classroom activity, comes to its frequency of use. Teachers noted
“I provide a written paraphrased version as that Philippine Literature students already have
complementary reading text” has the lowest subjects that teach them the language part of
mean in contrast to the paraphrastic approach their literature lessons that is why they don’t
often used by the instructors as shown in Table need to emphasize the word part of their lesson.
Volume 11 2014
90 Typology of Bukidnon State University
Another common approach seen by the exhibited the importance of pursuing the
students is LBA as echoed by the students’ affective part of the students’ development.
perceptions as shown in Frame 2. One observed
class showed how the instructor incorporated or reaction paper is a good affective strategy in
the language-based approach in the classroom. teaching literature.
In the teacher’s presentation, before students Although the perceptions on teaching
were asked to read the short story, the teacher strategies showed a different outcome as
indicated in the perceptions on teaching
if they know the word. After understanding the approaches, still the difference in Part A and
part B perceptions still supports the result of the
were then asked to use the words in their own
sentences. Somehow, only very few students the strategies suited for PRA. The comments
participated in that part of the lesson. The in Part A showed that MPA is predominantly
perceptions on the use of LBA backed-up the used while the perceptions in Part B for the
result of the class observation and also support strategies showed otherwise. Perhaps, this
means that some instructors are not aware of
Table 1. LBA is used but not as always as the
other approaches. This could be attributed to that they would like to use. With regards to the
the reason as mentioned in the interview with perceptions on the use of strategies under MPA,
these could mean that aside from PRA and PA,
whenever lessons related to language learning MPA was also used by the instructors but not
is combined with literary text readings. Since nearly always.
students are passive in this part of the teacher’s
presentation, teachers tend to do away with this Frame 4
approach.
One can denote from the perceptions “Identify those difficult words and give meaning to it.”
that the instructors do use varied approaches
in teaching their Philippine Literature class. Another important information is on the
However, it can be implied that they do not use use of LBA. Although the language is also given
it sparingly. importance by the instructors, their strategies
do not vary – they use LBA mostly to get the
B) Students’ perceptions on the strategies meaning of the ambiguous words (Frame 4).
employed by Philippine Literature instructors As earlier presented, LBA is seldom utilized
The overall perceptions showed that by the instructors since language is not the
focus in literature class. Since raising language
the PRA (Appendix C). Some of the perceptions awareness is seldom done in literature classes,
are shown in Frame 3.
Volume 11 2014
92 Typology of Bukidnon State University
References
that teachers are using different approaches but Kellem, H. (2009). The formeaning response
not incorporating enough activities for each approach: Poetry in the EFL classroom.
approach, thus the need to improve the choice English Teacher Forum, 4, 12-17.
of strategies or activities for each approach. Pieper, I. (2006). The teaching of literature.
The Bukidnon State University Research Journal
Grenna Marie Joy P. Simene 93
Retrieved from www.coe.int/lang
Rashid, R., Vethamani, M., & Rahman,
S. (2010). Approaches employed by
teachers in teaching literature to less
2.
Retrieved from www.ccsenet.org/elt
Salandanan, G. (2005). Teaching and
the teacher. Metro Manila: Lorimar
Publishing Co. Inc.
Sullivan, R (1991). Literature in the language
classroom. Retrieved from http://www.
melta.org.my/ET/1991/main6.html.
Wang, P. (2009). The application of integrated
literature instruction in freshman. Sino-
US English Teach, 6(9), 1-11.
Volume 11 2014