0% found this document useful (0 votes)
104 views11 pages

Student Midterm Final Exam

The document presents regression analysis of student exam scores, finding a linear relationship between midterm and final exam scores with an intercept of 31.74 and slope of 0.62. It also contains charts plotting exam scores and the regression line. The analysis finds the regression is statistically significant with p < 0.05 and an R-squared value of 0.301.

Uploaded by

Dinesh Kumar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
104 views11 pages

Student Midterm Final Exam

The document presents regression analysis of student exam scores, finding a linear relationship between midterm and final exam scores with an intercept of 31.74 and slope of 0.62. It also contains charts plotting exam scores and the regression line. The analysis finds the regression is statistically significant with p < 0.05 and an R-squared value of 0.301.

Uploaded by

Dinesh Kumar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

Student Midterm Final Exam

1 76 65
2 84 90
3 79 68 IF, MIDTERM 75
4 88 84 ENDTERM 78.17556
5 76 61
6 66 79 M 0.619
7 77 73 X 75
8 94 93 C 31.73
9 66 60
10 92 86 Y= MX+C
11 80 53
12 87 83
13 86 55
14 63 72
15 92 87
16 75 89
17 69 81
18 92 94
19 79 78
20 60 71
21 68 84
22 71 74
23 61 74
24 68 54
25 76 94
26 72 79
27 99 89
28 58 53
29 82 78
30 72 82
31 77 69
32 95 98
33 72 93
34 71 80
35 72 82
36 96 96
37 72 61
38 89 84
39 94 97
40 85 89
41 60 72
42 66 93
43 96 84
44 83 87
45 88 99
46 92 97
47 78 92
48 85 93
49 91 78
50 74 82
51 96 99
52 80 72
53 62 79
54 70 75
55 87 90
56 89 95
Chart
120

100

SUMMARY OUTPUT 80

60
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.5482902802
40
R Square 0.3006222314
Adjusted R Square 0.2876707912 20
Standard Error 10.650193962
Observations 56 0
55 60 65 70 75 80

ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 2632.80118819796 2632.801 23.21149 1.2173724E-05
Residual 54 6125.03809751633 113.4266
Total 55 8757.83928571429

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%


Intercept 31.738559304 10.2609853893756 3.09313 0.003133 11.1665222208
Midterm 0.6191600449 0.12851428599594 4.81783 1.217E-05 0.3615044147

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.5482902802
R Square 0.3006222314
Adjusted R Square 0.2876707912
Standard Error 10.650193962
Observations 56

ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 2632.80118819796 2632.801 23.21149 1.2173724E-05
Residual 54 6125.03809751633 113.4266
Total 55 8757.83928571429

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%


Intercept 31.738559304 10.2609853893756 3.09313 0.003133 11.1665222208
Midterm 0.6191600449 0.12851428599594 4.81783 1.217E-05 0.3615044147

IF,
IF,
IF,
IF,
Chart Title

60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105

Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%


52.31059639 11.166522221 52.310596388
0.876815675 0.3615044147 0.87681567516

Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%


52.31059639 11.166522221 52.310596388
0.876815675 0.3615044147 0.87681567516
Consumer Products Advertising Cost-Sales Data

Ad Cost Sales (€)


300 7000
350 9000
400 10000
450 10600 A linear model would be most appropriate.

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.965399
R Square 0.931995
Adjusted R 0.897992
Standard E 503.9841
Observatio 4

ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 6962000 6962000 27.40945 0.034601
Residual 2 508000 254000
Total 3 7470000

Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%
Intercept 300 1709.093 0.175532 0.876826 -7053.635 7653.635
Ad Cost (€) 23.6 4.507771 5.235403 0.034601 4.204627 42.99537
Y= MX+C

M 23.6 12100
X 500
C 300

Y=MX+C
Y= 23.6*500+300
12100

IF, COST 500


SALES 12100

Sales (€)
Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0% 12000
-7053.635 7653.635
10000
4.204627 42.99537
8000

6000

4000

2000

0
280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460
Consulting Group

Overhead Costs Billable Hours


355000 3000
400000 4000
425000 5000
477000 6000
560000 7000
580000 8000

Billable Hours
9000

8000

7000

6000

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000

0
300000 350000 400000 450000 500000 550000 600000 Y MX+C

M 47.34
X 4500
C 205781
SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.98642166062
R Square 0.97302769254
Adjusted R Squa 0.96628461568
Standard Error 16486.9356649
Observations 6

ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 3.92E+10 3.92E+10 144.3003 0.000275305
Residual 4 1.09E+09 2.72E+08
Total 5 4.03E+10

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%Lower 95.0%
Intercept 205780.952381 22697.18 9.066368 0.00082 142763.4882 268798.4 142763.5
Billable Hours 47.3428571429 3.941131 12.0125 0.000275 36.40052205 58.28519 36.40052

Mrginal increase in overhead cost is 213030


Y 418810.9524
YES, IT IS GOOD FOR THE COMPANY AS IT IS MAKING PROFIT
THE JOB IS ATTRACTIVE
Upper 95.0%
268798.4
58.28519

AKING PROFIT

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy