Unit 17 Ta Ündem Formacio Ün
Unit 17 Ta Ündem Formacio Ün
0. INTRODUCTION
1. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
1.1. Linguistic levels involved in the notion of spatial reference
1.2. Definition of spatial reference: what and how
2. THE EXPRESSION OF SPATIAL REFERENCE
2.1. Main Features of Prepositions
2.2. Spatial reference in terms of other general categories
2.3. Spatial reference at a sentence level
2.4. The Semantic Function
3. EXPRESSION OF PLACE
3.1. Expression of positive position and destination: at, to, on, onto, in,
into.
3.2. Expression of negative position: away from, off, out of.
3.3. Relative position: over, under, etc.
3.4. Space: by, beside, with, near (to), close to, opposite.
3.5. Space: between, among, amongst, amid, amidst.
3.6. Space: around, round, about.
3.7. Relative destination: over, under, behind, etc.
3.8. Passage: over, under, behind, etc.
3.9. Passage: across, through, past.
4. EXPRESSION OF DIRECTION
4.1. Movement with reference to a directional path: up, down, along,
across, etc.
4.2. Orientation: beyond, over, past, up, across, etc.
4.3. Resultative meaning: from, out of, over, past, etc.
4.4. Pervasive meaning: over, throughout, with, etc.
5.EXPRESSION OF DISTANCE
6. CONCLUSION
7. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Here, the expression of place, direction and distance will be the focal point of our study.
Generally speaking, these three categories are expressed by means of prepositions,
therefore, this form word will play a leading role in our analysis.
A notable figure of the English language is the extremely wide lexicogrammatical use it
makes of prepositions. In the most general terms, a preposition expresses a relation
between two entities, one being that represented by the prepositional complement, related
to something else in the proposition. Of the various types of relational meaning, those of
PLACE and TIME are the most prominent and easy to identify, as well as those of
INSTRUMENT and CAUSE.
The expression of place and direction are chiefly adverbials and postmodifiers. They answer
the questions “Where?”, so that all of the following could be answers to the question Where
did you leave the bicycle?
over there. (ADVERB)
I left it in the river. (PREPOSITIONAL PHRASE)
two miles away. (NOUN PHRASE + away, back ...)
where I found it. (ADVERBIAL CLAUSE)
Place expressions can also on occasion act as a subject or complement of a sentence (Over
here is where I put the books), but this is rather informal. A range of grammatical structures
and functions for expressing place is similar to that for expressing time. It is important to
note that some forms have related meaning in the two fields (the prepositions at, from and
between).
In this paper, we will try to offer a description of the use and meaning of the different
resources of the English language to express spatial relationships. First, we shall provide a
general framework to this notion. Then, the expression of spatial reference will comprise
our second part. Finally, the expression of place, direction and distance will be explained in
turn.
All of this will be done under the scope of relevant works such as Quirk and Greenbaum's A
University Grammar of English (1973), which provides a thorough analysis of the English
grammar, and Leech and Svartvik's A Communicative Grammar of English (1975).
1. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
This theoretical framework aims at answering questions such as where this notion is to be
found within the linguistic level, what it describes and how and which grammar categories
are involved in its description at a functional level.
Next, the expression of spatial reference will be examined through the category of
prepositions. But this is not always so since other categories may be involved as possible
answers to the question of Where...? Moreover, it must be noted that, although
prepositions are mainly classified following morphological and syntactic rules, our study will
be primarily based on the semantic field, since it is here where we find the notion of
prepositions of place, and therefore, it will lead us to the analysis of spatial reference in
terms of position, direction and distance.
(2) Another kind of syntactic structure involves clause subordination, where we find
different types regarding verbs. Thus (a) the more nuclear dependents of the verb, subject
in clause structure and complement in verbal structure, which are filled by noun phrases
(i.e. in the street, after two hours); (b) prepositional phrases are mainly either of place (i.e.
at home ), direction (i.e. to school) or time (i.e. at night).
We also distinguish (c) complements to prepositional verbs, where the verb selects from a
handful of short prepositions (i.e. ask for, consist of, depend on, hope for). In this type, the
constituent that follows the verb function as direct object (long for, refer to, rely on, succeed
in).
Moreover, we find (d) non-finite verb clauses (or infinitival clauses) which function as
modifier of the verbal phrase, and in which the verb is an infinitive, as in ' I was surprised to
hear her opinion', or a present participle -ing, as in 'I was surprised at her saying this'.
Furthermore, (e) we may find the finite content clause as modifier of an adjectival phrase, as
in 'I was so surprised that I couldn't say anything'. Also, we may find (f) a noun phrase (i.e. I
was surprised at the financial estimates') or (g) a wh- phrase (i.e. I was surprised at what she
said). But, (h) we also find place conjuncts, which denote static position and also direction,
movement, and passage under the general term ' direction'. Place adjuncts are mainly
realized by means of prepositional phrases (i.e. in the park, out of my house, etc.) since
these roles can be clearly and conveniently specified through the respective
Unit 17 www.oposicionestandem.com Pg.5
prepositional meaning (i.e. in-out, from-to, up-down, through, onto, etc.), although
sometimes we need noun phrases to amplify meaning (i.e. a very long way, several miles
away).
Most placed adjuncts are prepositional phrases (i.e. in a small village, a long way from here,
past the sentry, wherever he went, from the desk, etc.) which evoke responses to a 'where'
question, such as to position (where?), direction (where?), source (where from?), and
distance (how far?) with stative or dynamic verbs. For instance, position and distance use
stative verbs (live, stay), whereas direction and source use dynamic verbs (go to, come
from).
And finally, (i) we must not forget that idioms constitute that 'free process of forming lexical
lexemes' which permit grammatical contrasts (i.e. What about...?/It's up to you/It's over/Eat
it up/etc.).
All these items have the same function but belong to different grammatical categories or
class (i.e. noun, adjective, finite clause...). We may observe that although such subordinate
clauses have broadly the same function as adverbs, we do not normally find anything like
the close semantic equivalence to adverbs illustrated above for prepositional phrases.
Then, once we have seen how both function and word class are relevant for our present
purposes, we are ready to examine the expression of spatial reference, and especially,
position, direction and distance through them. These expressions can be grouped together
into word classes (also called parts of speech) following morphological, syntactic, and
semantic rules, bearing in mind the phonological one when pronouncing prepositions or
other periphrastic expressions (i.e. in the air).
3. EXPRESSION OF PLACE
The choice of preposition depends on the way we see an object. We can distinguish three
types of prepositions depending on the dimensional properties of the location concerned:
A) Dimension-type 0: The preposition signals a dimensionless location, a mere
POINT in relation to which the position of an element can be indicated. Consider AT
in the example:
My bike is at the car park.
B) Dimension-type 1 or 2: Consider the example:
My house is on that road
In this sentence the road is viewed as a LINE ("along that road"), i.e. dimension-type
1. But the preposition "on" can also be used to denote an AREA as in:
There is a new roof on the house.
Here the house is viewed as a two-dimensional area, i.e. as SURFACES, this is
dimension-type 2.
C) Dimension-type 2 or 3: It denotes AREA or SURFACE. This kind of dimension is
expressed by "in" or "out of . See:
There are only two beds in the house.
Here, the house is considered as a three-dimensional object which in reality it is. This
is dimension-type 3. "In" is also capable of being used with objects that are
essentially two-dimensional, as in:
The dogs are in the garden.
Here garden is conceived of as an enclosed space.
a. EXPRESSION OF POSITIVE POSITION AND DESTINATION: AT, ON, TO, ONTO, IN, INTO.
To express positive position and destination, prepositional phrases take the form of adjuncts
(relating an event to a location) or postmodifiers (relating some object to a location).
A prepositional phrase of position can accompany most verbs, although this meaning is
associated with verbs of stative meaning: to be, to stand, etc. The meaning of destination
normally accompanies a verb of dynamic "motional" meaning, such as to go, to move, to
fly…
In many cases (especially in colloquial English), "on" and "in" may be used for both position
and destination:
A) Dimension-type 0:
At the bus stop
At the South Pole
At the end of the street
B) Dimension-type 1 and 2:
LINE
The city is situated on the River Rhin.
The city is situated on the boundary.
The city is situated on the coast.
SURFACE
A notice was pasted on the wall.
A notice was pasted on the ceiling.
A notice was pasted on my back.
C) Dimension-type 2 and 3:
AREA
In the world
In the village
VOLUME
In a box
In the bathroom
In the cathedral
Over and under as place prepositions are roughly synonymous with above and below,
respectively. The main differences are that over and under tend to indicate a direct vertical
relationship or spatial proximity, while above and below may indicate simply "on a
higher/lower lever than":
The Castle stands on a hill above/'?over the valley.
Keep this blanket over/*above you.
Underneath and beneath <formal> are less common substitutes for under. Underneath, like
on top of, generally indicates a contiguous relation:
The police found the stolen money under/underneath the carpet.
We placed the skis on top of the car.
4. EXPRESSION OF DIRECTION
4.1 Movement with reference to a directional path: up, down, along, across, etc
Up, down, across and (a)round, with verbs of motion, make up a group of prepositions
expressing movement with reference to an axis or directional path. Up and down contrast in
terms of vertical direction, eg:
We walked up the hill and down the other side.
Along contrasts with across ("from one side to another") in terms of a horizontal axis:
Be careful when you walk across the street.
With (a)round, the directional path is an angle or curve:
We ran (a)round the corner.
Towards indicates both "real" and "implied" motion, "in the direction of":
We walked towards the old farmhouse.
5. EXPRESSION OF DISTANCE
Distance can be expressed by means of noun phrases of measure such as: a foot, a few
yards, ten miles, a long way, etc. These phrases can modify a verb of motion:
He ran several miles.
They can also precede and modify an adverbial of place or direction:
They live a long way away.
The valley lay two thousand feet below them.
They flew two hundred miles (to the) West.
If the reference is to movement, the corresponding question form is:
Unit 17 www.oposicionestandem.com Pg.13
How far did he run?
But if the reference is to static location the question form is:
How far away do they live?
6. CONCLUSION
In this paper we have dealt with the different ways of expressing place, direction and
distance in English. The most common device used to express relational meanings are
prepositions. Thus, this unit has aimed to relate the different prepositional phrases with
their corresponding functions. In this sense, in the description of prepositions we have
found prepositions denoting positive position, relative position, orientation, etc. The
expression of spatio-temporal relations in English is very different from the Spanish way.
This is the reason why students find it really difficult to use prepositions in English.
7. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aarts, F., and J. Aarts. English Syntactic Structures. Functions & Categories in Sentence
Analysis. Prentice Hall Europe, 1988.
Greenbaum, S. and R. Quirk. A Student's Grammar of the English Language. London:
Longman, 1990.
Huddleston, R.. English Grammar, An Outline. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Quirk, R & S. Greenbaum. A University Grammar of English. London: Longman, 1973.
Thomson, A.J. and A.V. Martinet. A Practical English Grammar. OUP, 1986.