How To Write A Case Brief
How To Write A Case Brief
Guide
By Indeed Editorial Team
Updated September 21, 2021 | Published February 26, 2020
The Indeed Editorial Team comprises a diverse and talented team of writers,
researchers and subject matter experts equipped with Indeed's data and
insights to deliver useful tips to help guide your career journey.
In appellate courts, however, each side of a case presents their own brief
to the court as a way of briefly stating their specific argument using case
law precedents, statistics and policy arguments to help the judge make a
decision. The petitioner usually files their brief first, and the respondent has
a specified amount of time to file a reply brief. These documents are often
public record, accessible to anyone who wishes to search for it.
While each case has its own unique details—and, therefore, will use varied
versions of this outline—a brief should include only the most important
points of your case and stay within 600 words (before concurrences and
dissents), using the following headings:
There are several similar formats you might choose for your legal case.
Most include the same general information but might use slightly different
terminology. For example, one legal case brief might include a “Procedural
history” discussing how the case may have been approached in previous
cases, courts or by different legal council, while another may omit this
section because there was no legal history.
In some case briefs, the facts of the case might be referred to as “Facts” or
“Facts of the case.” While each court might have slightly different formats
they use to describe the case, the most effective protocol is to use the
format that is most useful or appropriate to your specific case.
A case brief should start with the title of the case, citation and author. The
title of the case names the two opposing sides of the argument. The name
of the person or party who initiated legal action (petitioner or plaintiff)
appears first, followed by the respondent (defendant). The citation provides
the contact details of the case reporter.
Next, state the facts that are legally relevant to the case. A fact is only
legally relevant it has had an impact on the outcome of the case and should
be listed as:
The legal issue is your argument. It should include the facts and questions
posed to the court. The legal issue in question should not include details
specific to the current case. Instead, the legal issue should be stated as a
legal question that can be answered with a 'yes' or 'no' without ambiguity. If
the case involves constitutional rights, you'll need to outline all relevant
points of interest related to the U.S. Constitution.
The rule of law should state the legal principle(s) upon which the court's
decision was based. While a legal opinion may apply more than one legal
principle, your objective in this section is to identify the rule of law pertinent
to the case and present it in plain terms in a single sentence.
The rule of law should answer the question proposed in the legal issue
section of the case, typically as a restatement of the question in answer
form. This section can also include a statement of policy or the reasons
behind the laws mentioned here.
In this section, the reasons behind a court decision are explained in legal
terms. You should begin by answering 'yes' or 'no' to the question asked in
the legal issue section.
The specific format in which this section should be structured is called the
CREAC (conclusion, rule, explanation, application and conclusion) method.
This is sometimes referred to as the “IRAC” (issue, rule, application,
conclusion) method, but using CREAC tends to be more explicit and more
accurately interpreted. This is the section to make sure that all relevant
legal rules and rationales are clearly explained and applied to the pertinent
facts of the case.
If a judge hearing a case doesn't wholly agree with the majority decision,
they'll write a dissenting opinion to be included in the case file. If a second
judge agrees with the majority decision but not with the reasoning behind it,
that judge will write a concurring opinion.
You should also briefly explain your reaction to the prevailing opinion. If you
agree with some points but not others, be sure to note them here. Be sure
to use an objective voice and mindset to analyze the court's decision and
identify ways it will impact society, whether politically, socially or
economically.