Date 29th October,2O22

Department / Plant Legal

Name
Subject / Topic of Prevention of Sexual Harassment at the Workplace
the Trainins
Training lmparted Sravya Kopparapu
By
Duration of the 60 minutes
Training
Venue Leap lndia Food & Logistics Private Limited

RECORDS OF TRAINING IMPARTED

S.No. Name of the Emp. Code Sign of Employee

( Participant
1. fur/'r+ F*o *s loo o4 r*>-jt)---o
2. ( tr^,.r...--rr . tr 1-, r-/
3. 6. \uo^,.-o to lrll
fl.{--^;.*/- t7'k-\te
4.
5. G.-ri4a\
-
'iP
6. fl H;*^ t\.^ J,^ t.e;^-^-
7. r. K,a,h**i x rcL)G ntal^Q.-
8. !5a1,La-.- ,ffi=
9. <. Sd M.d.rYr*{ <l#l^^-*
10. V,6*; KtrhL,,,^o v;,rL>
1.1.. \1,r.,.-'0.-.-) . 6 /-4
1-2. M(rulfKft" f fihun&b-
13. O- cnr.'ialnYa/ A h
74. r.r. C,^f,L^ gn, tl lLll e
15. 11 PttS i^rrJt T?"!f--
( 76. nlA,.Q, iU>nna .ryt
77. Ci;-}+zE\N A-.-br a-l;---l-, \
-
18. *. loqqqnq, &_
:.4

19. ?u[,-^ .a*

20. Arno. P o ?/'
2L.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
 Group Activity

Question 1
'Vfhat
happens rvhen no one di-tectly caused affrontwith you, but passed sexual comments,
or commented about your looks behind your back?
Answer L
Will this also quali$, as sexual harassment?
Yes, gossiping at wotk about the looks of a woman who works in the same workplace is
indeed dangetous, and illegal!

Question 2
What about preferential treatment due to sexual interest?
Answer 2
At the workplace, often demands for sexual favours (especially when it is by a senior) are
coupled with promises of some kind of preferential ueatment, or implicit presumption
^rt
that the work envitonment may tutn unpleasant in case the demand is not adhered to.
As pet the Act, any ptomises of prefereryial or detrimental treatment, thteats related to a
l( woman's employment status ot interfefence with her work, creation an intimidating,
offensive ot hostile wotk envitonmeflt, or humiliating treatment which affects her health
and safety are indicators that afiy unwelcome behaviour, contact, advances or
communication has caused sexual harassment to the.woman.
Conduct that is not of a sexual nature will not be covered within the definition of sexual
harassment. Therefore, a v/oman will not be protected undet the Act in situations of threat
of violence, offensive language or slang which is not sexual, and which is not accompanied
by othet acts that constitute sexual harassment.

Scenario Based Questions-

Identify Whether the Conduct Qualifies As Sexual Flarassment

Question 3
Miss futu rvorks in a MNC. Her boss l\{r. Raj often uses abusive names (Hindi non-sexual
( slangs) while reprimanding his subordinates, irrespective of their Gender. Miss Ritu took
offence against such abusive language and files a complaint for sexual harassment?
'Vfhether
such claim is sustainable?
Answer 3
No, the claim is not sustainable as the abuse by Mr. Raj was of a non-sexual manner. While
Mr. Raj conduct may be professionally unacceptable, only conduct which has sexual
overtones can be btought under the purview of the Sexual Harassment Act.

Question 4 I
Pnya is a new hire in a company. Thete's lot of wotk in the otganisation and her supedor
often requires her to stay in office and work late night to complete the tasks at hand. She
finds this too stressful and disturbing and wants to make a complaint for sexual harassment.
Does such a claim qualift as Sexual Harassment?
Answer 4
No, the claim is not sustainable as the threat was flot of a sexual nature, but purely based
on a business need, that is, achieving assigned business targets.
 I

Luxp *n&ua

Training Evaluation Form bv Trainee

Name of the Topic: POSH at the Workplace Participant's Name: ).J&r^ol ,t-
0
Date:29th october,2o22 Designation,gr. Ea.ao,-#,'rle-G,y,tt<eralats .

Name of the Trainer: Sravya Kopparapu Department / Location, (n r,r'*net-;| aJ g

Please write your comments:

1. The best thing about this session *rs QO t L" kno d *Lo u* I OS H o-^ J

*{e-*\ ',1 L ketp*,^\ +o +{.e

+o "^0\"u, + 14^2-
14^a-
(g,.r.ta.,a-q.r^\L
( z. ,orr,.i" r,or\rro, this session *r' td i t{- P Os H, t^J g r }- e'n'/i ro rLnce-r'1'f
W0,,.-[J (Lrn- posi$ve u,Ves A,U lu"l :ect-r-reJ -

3. On a scale of 1 to 10 (1 being the worst, 10 being the best), how would you rate this workshop:
a Structure to
b Methodology used lo
c Content 10
d Delivery to
e lnteraction among participants lo
4. Things that could have been improved: +tL qd e**V-
d

(
5. Comments, if any:

The trainer: lPlease tick where appropriatel

1. Knewthe subject:
/
Very Well Average Below Average Poor

2. Maintained your interest:

Very Well Average Below Average Poor

3. Encouraged you to talk and ask questions:

Very Well Average Below Average Poor

 ., =::?,fu
ir *#
.l *"r.S
...1 -"'.,t G Lxxp lr:Sir

Training Evaluation Form bv Trainee

Name of the Topic: POSH at the Workplace Participant's Name: (t p*o 0a" Avs
Date: 29th October, 2022 Designation: -ll'-.J Taab^{l"1
Name of the Trainer: Sravya Kopparapu Department / Location: aaya^*"blu

PIease write your comments:

L. The best thing about this session was:
y'u'u"-n lt40{a
9er^rru.- q ! rc tD'n lra fte a cuhL'c^'

(
Q^'!.enA1 i u-^dl+lW'1'
2. Your take home from this sessiog was: t1

4 tlbb*l/.-A N L.E ' tl^lo

Ab t51611 il/4*
eht
3. On a scale of 1 to 10 (1 being the worst, 10 being the best), how would you rate this workshop:
a
b
Structure
Methodology used 1
r
c Content 4
d
e
Delivery
lnteraction among participants
r,r/ I
4. Things that could have been improved:

Nua'1n {Dowt /w Q'u1*"'*'b )

(
5. Comments, if any:

.- nf*'o\v -
^Eh?
a

The trainer: (Please tick where oppropriotel

7. Knew the subject:

Verv Well Average BelowAverage Poor

2. Maintained your interest:

Very Well Average Below Average Poor

3. Encouraged you to talk and ask questions:

.-^, Well
Very Average Below Average Poor

*..\

P6-f'
 Lsnp *nffiia

Training Evaluation Form bv Trainee

Name of the Topic: POSH at the Workplace Participant'sName:

\.O7,lk
Date: 29th october, 2022 Designation, €HS VlXno-a .

Department / Location: 4a g A"

Name of the Trainer: Sravya Kopparapu
f l4
A.
J"Url5 q
Please write your comments:
1. The best thing about this session was: J'gt^t"'" "^^'

(
3
Your take home from this session was: nb,r-ocli*s A i).*s .

3. On a scale of 1 to 10 (1- being the worst, 10 being the best), how would you rate this workshop:
a Structure e
b Methodology used *
c Content q
d Delivery R
e I nteraction among participants
2
4. Things that could have been improved: HAn e<q*'f b I

(
5. Comments, if any:

B. The trainer: lPlease tick where dppropriatel

L. Knewthe subject:
,"
V6ry Welt Average Below Average Poor

2. Maintained your interest:

Average Below Average Poor

3. Encourag,gd you to talk and ask questions:

/
Veq2Well Average Below Average Poor
 d-ffi-% Leap trgia
*fu$ti
Training Evaluation Form bv Trainee

Name of the Topic: POSH at the Workplace Participant's Name:

Date: 29th October, 2022 Designation:

Name of the Trainer: Sravya Kopparapu Department / Location:

A. Please write your comments:

L. The best thing about this session was:

t^te^Ltn^^.J, ?r,.fi"J, *[^r^ o^J ev *^&^dA a^*bf4

C-"c"?t €\y rl.-os,
(," 2. your,.t . r,or" rrl, this session was: Q.n .^,.<e.- on c--t^d P., U e^-,
r,r;Lu.e-wa vue
d..* o p." ll.r-, -t 6b9nL p6r- ,^r.AJ 4ry
3. "t-fl-J+
of t(o
On a scale 10 (1 being the worst, 10 being the best), how would you rate this workshop:
a Structure lo
b Methodology used lo
c Content lo
d Delivery lo
! nteraction among participants
e ln
4. Things that could have been improved: i^no',^ft. h^-oha- iJ
4o.no +" i^^ol^f;.
"a: *^J
y\^^L4 d-a c-^^r.g-ia-y a{"JJ i^r.s(..e- +^e-
T-"-" "ll
( p^At. aV^*E +s*J,^r+J +q=- csnc .ft
5. Comments, if any:
N (*

B. The trainer: (Pleale tick where appropriatel

1. Knewthe subject:

,lfieryWell Average Betow Average poor

2. Maintained your interest:

vderV Well Average Below Average poor

3. Encouraged you to talk and ask questions:

r,l" ry Well Average Below Average poor

 -

Lxrp *w&ta

Traininp Evaluation Form bv Trainee

Name of the Topic: POSH at the Workplace Participant's Name: .SgiUr n r u' 6
Date: 29th October, 2022 Designation:

Name of the Trainer: Sravya Kopparapu Department / Location: OP € R ATI pNe / tt'o'

Please write your comments:

1. The best thing about this session was:
'o- D
R'r!.c- pl "-d-,*c)-h l"tl**,
oA Aoo. 4 \natna 8' '^r)
ln"rZr^ -i- re= t^,;rrW As nI,,^ .

( 2. Your take home from this session was:

g&o,vrttt-' br-llurtn +$3 C€op(f fr\.a.\,h ))

8*r-u,'^nc\"f* 9r1 afr;r4=.
3' On a scale of 1 to 10 (1 being the worst, 10 being the best), how would you rate this workshop:
a Structure (o
b Methodology used lo
c Content q
d Delivery 1o
e lnteraction among participants q
4. Things that could have been improved:

l.rtt-
(
5. Comments, if any:
+--
o*g-r:'1'*<A low"sA
€
\l e^+L tttc)\

B. The trainer: lPlease tick where oppropriotel

L. Knew the subject:
,ra
Very Well Average Below Average Poor

2. Maintained your interest:

/
Very Well Average Below Average Poor
3. Encouraged you to talk and ask questions:

Very Well Average Below Average Poor

/
/w r-'
' zr\rp \'r:--
 I

Lunp fin#rx

Training Evaluation Form bv Trainee

Name of the Topic: POSH at the Workplace Participant's Name: ?' Yb W;kq
Date: 29th October, 2022 Designation 3 dvt'e)rrnl4l 9unY!f, t

Name of the Trainer: Sravya Kopparapu Department / Location: prii*/ fr{anJrtt'rtt

d alu uoxklzlau *it*

Please write your comments:
L. The best thing about this session was: t lt PosH
'iFe irnSanal;*'t , F'of;'t'd
oL*J
te dxanaP /u64cl'
( 2. Your take honle from this sessiqn was:

l:rt'rir:
*,4; r. *H.f ',,{ff! i * *;'l:,*i ffiz&"ffi^
Fo\tl.
3. On a scale of 1 to 10 (1 being the worst, 10 being the best), how would you rate this workshop:
a Structure to
b Methodolosv used t0
c Content t0
d Delivery l0
e Interaction among participants t0

4. Thines that could have been imoroved:

nrhl,ry 4e- ffpt( in fi-s,,rnho't aloo/ #e Postl oe7"x/wzn/

(
5. Comments, if any'
'try1 lu i)ahn 'llre yeoT/e /" (t,oc/ orl 10 //,e
"ll o( Xiua
tnpakn"t inl,so,r*l "/f ofrwe ho/ +u. il v

The trainer: lPleose tick where oppropriotel

7. Knewthe subject:

verfwett t Average Below Average hoor

2. Maintained your interest:

ve{wel Average Below Average Poor

3. Encouraged you to talk and ask questions:

Very-Well Average Below Average Poor

 I-xrp lrttlir

Training Evaluation Form bv Trainee n

Workplace
Name of the Topic: PoSH at the p"rU.ip"r,ys Name:
VO--/' l'-r"* -q
Date: 29th october,2o:2 Designation | 4d-^1 /^,;- tL ** / -
^
Name of the Trainer: Sravya Kopparapu Department/ Location z -Jtrq'J,*-..L^1 'Ho ,

A. Please write your comments:

7. The best thing about this session was:

2. Your take home from this session was:

3. On a scale of 1to 10 (1 being the worst, 10 being the best), how would you rate this workshop:
a Structure tO
b Methodologv used to
c Content to
d Delivery to
e I nteraction among participants I
4. Things that could have been improved:

(
5. Comments, if any:

B. The trainer:
--<t
(Pleose tick where appropriatel
L. Knewthe subject:
,r Well
yzVery Average Below Average Poor

2. Maintained your interest:

\ffiell Average Below Average Poor

3. Encouraged you to talk and ask questions:

y2nffuen Average Below Average Poor

_.:*-

-"@fTfge,"
tw ffi& Lcap lnitia
we-afl.*e:affi

Training Evaluation Form by Trainee

Name of the Topic: POSH at the Workplace Participant's Name: Amon ${pr.d
Date: 29th October, 2022 Designation:

Name of the Trainer: Sravya Kopparapu Department/Location: Finur\eg / UV91

A. Please write your comments:

t. The best thing about this session was:

und€$stord in? aborr t 9OS H $onc+loqin

- q , l\lS o ;t
rerqt $.rn rGBS-iOn, 4
(\
2. Your take home from this session was:
Yt- F ttrro,.ring +bd Ouyl isr€vbnc.er ,,,ri ll be qJJ r.qrse q)
in o pyopeln *i
3. On a scale of 1- to L0 (1 being the worst, 10 being the best), how would you rate this workshop:
a Structure 8
b Methodoloev used q
c Content t
d Delivery 8
e lnteraction among participants I
4. Things that could have been improved:

(
5. Comments, if any:

B. The trainer: (Please tick where appropriatel

1. Knew the subject:
,r/
Very Well Average Below Average Poor

2. Maintained your interest:

v"rv(al Average Below Average Poor

3. Encouraged you to talk and ask questions:

Very
JWell Average Below Average Poor
 -

.,',t-''';l!,1'!/'2
"a r , t-eapl**ia
=::
Training Evaluation Form bv Trainee
.<z | r
r

Name of the Topic: POSH at the Workplace Participant', 1rr".z(<Sh ',"ft"\

Date:29th october,2Oll Designation, ffe<L,ro*J*," n
Name of the Trainer: Sravya Kopparapu toN
Department / Location: Co..,r.rc"rlC

A. Please write your comments:

L. The best thing about this session was:

&o.t b h.,*l "tJ" Fs\''

(
2. Your take home from this session was:

rn* *J rlorne^ SuJ rAlu t* {q1"ct

3. On a scale of 1to 10 (1 being the worst, 10 being the best), how would you rate this workshop:
a Structure \o
b Methodology used \o
c Content le)
d Delivery AQ
e !nteraction among participants \o
4. Things that could have been improved:

(
5. Comments, if any:

B. The trainer: (Pleose tick where oppropriatel

L. Knew the sulject:
./
Very Well Average Below Average Poor

2. Maintalrec!)purffi6rest:

Very Well Average Below Average Poor

3. Encourage{you to talk and ask questions:

lr,/
Very Well Average Below Average Poor
 ffi*xaylxt{ti*
Leap lndia Food & Logistics Pvt Ltd
Training on P0SH - 07th May 2022
ler: Ms.Sravya -
:::: :::::: ::: ::r :
:: :,,,,,,'NamB ..,,,,,, ,,,,, ',, Department
1 Gandini Srikanth F&A
2 Prakash Rao KVS HR & Administration
3 K Gopi Krishna Finanace \IJ" (.
4 Y.Sudhakar Reddy Land &Administration
5 Anilkumar Atluri Administration
6 M.Sreenivasulu CS ,4.;/u^JY"'
7 AnsarAliM Projects €1a'a"--r
8 P Satish Kumar Audit
9 Pingali.Karthik CS \0$w
10 Manikanda K Projects
( 11 Satish Kumar L HR f,.b 9AK,,,a
12 Vishal RajDhiman Corporate Communications
13 TodewalgChaitanya Railways Ar(l--
14

15
Manikanda A
Sravya K
Proiects
Legal /e
AW
't6 TS Prabhu Rajan Projects --U
17 Prasanth S Land & Administration
r8 Viiay G Accounts
19 Sai Kiran Land & Administration
20 Sowianya B Accounts
21 Siddappa CH Accounts $,\DArvt0"
22 Sai Praneeth IT ,(?r.a.rw
23 Pushpata K Accounts
24 Venkatesh Accounts
25 Prabhakaran M Proiects
z6 Swetha P Commerciat
( 27 I.Hima Bindu Accounts l/u-.r'ry
z8 Mounika P Proiects flgu4) L
29 Saniav Verutkar Proiects ftug/
3o S.Etayaraia Proiects &t
.., .ra.*CTn
31 Madhuri Accounts
32 Chaitanya K Commercial
33 Mukesh Goud Administration
34 Manoj Goud Administration lrfr
35 Somanna Administration 7