Constitutional Morality
Constitutional Morality
The constitutional morality (CM) is not defined anywhere, however, there are many
different notions on the same. What is Constitutional Morality and what significance does it
hold? It basically means adherence to the core principles of the constitution in a democracy
i.e. a moral obligation of an individual to uphold the constitutional values with utmost
dignity without any compromise and being faithful towards it. It thus goes beyond the literal
interpretation of the text of the constitution and dwells into the spirit of the constitution in
which both individual and collective interests of the society are satisfied. This doctrine is
still in its nascent stage in India and has been evolving over the period of time. In the recent
times, the doctrine has often been invoked by Supreme Court in India for striking down
laws which could be termed as manifestations of popular morality and in the process, has
acquired new meanings and interpretations. Safeguards and upholds the enforcement of rule
of law in the country: CM basically means to bow down to the norms of the Constitution
and not to act in a manner which would become violative of the rule of law or reflecting an
action in an arbitrary manner. As the doctrine tends to question both the citizens as well as
the government, it promotes people to be an active participant of the system and fight the
inequalities and non-constitutional elements.
Interestingly, Ambedkar, the architect of the Constitution of India, is perhaps the first, who
has explicitly and vocally engaged in length with the phrase ‘constitutional morality’.
Without mentioning and shedding light on Ambedkar’s understanding of constitutional
morality, discussions on the subject would be incomplete. Ambedkar, while addressing the
Constituent Assembly in 1948, invoked, George Grotius, the English historian, to explain as
to what constitutional morality is, and what is its significance in a nation where democracy
was a top-dressing on the soil which is essentially undemocratic.
Ambedkar, drawing on the work of Grotius, formulate his understanding of constitutional
morality as “a paramount reverence for the forms of the Constitution”.
It was for the true realization of the objective of the Constitution, amidst staggering
inequality and inequity which India faced and the tensed political climate, that Ambedkar
used ‘constitutional morality’. Ambedkar, while addressing this sorry state, after a thorough
diagnosis, articulated that the panacea for this does not lie only in the constitution or the
government ruling the nation. For Ambedkar, constitutional morality was the answer to this
disparity in the society and if there exists congruency between the “form of the
administration” and “form of the “constitution” then, he hoped, we can get rid of it
gradually.
Also, the most striking facet of Constitutional Morality has been its innate transformative
nature. Through this, it has been ensured by the SC that no individual who is being
governed by the Constitution remains bereft in the realization of its fruit. Instructively, in
this light, Justice Chandrachud offered in the Sabarimala judgement (2018) that the Indian
Constitution “has a transformative character so that hitherto deprived and marginalized
citizens can enjoy their citizenship rights”.
The researcher will majorly research on “Constitutional morality”, its meaning importance
and applicability. whether it may be applied by the judiciary to assess State actions which
are substantively unreasonable or violative of the spirit of the Constitution. This will
indirectly address the issue with usage of public morality by minimizing the possibility of
unreasonable decision making while simultaneously providing a space for public morality to
naturally evolve.
The research will initially cover the analysis of literature on “Constitutional morality” by
refering constitutional debates and further will trace how it has grown in India and other
counties and what all are recent trends.
The research will work upon and try to find answer follwing:
• The term has not been clearly defined by the SC, which leaves the scope of its subjective
interpretation by the individual judges.
• This top-down approach to morality can affect the possibility of organic emergence of the
solutions to the persisting ethical problems in society.