Scribd
Upload
83 views3 pages

Screening Guidelines For Assistant Professor

The document provides guidelines for screening candidates applying for the position of Assistant Professor at Central University of Jharkhand. It outlines a 100 point scale for evaluating candidates based on their academic qualifications and experience. Points are awarded for grades obtained in graduation, post-graduation, M.Phil, Ph.D, research publications, teaching experience, and awards. Candidates will be shortlisted for interview based on total scores in descending order. In case of a tie, the candidate with higher marks at Master's level will be ranked higher. Screening scores will not impact final selection by the interview committee.

Uploaded by

Konark Raj
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
83 views3 pages

Screening Guidelines For Assistant Professor

The document provides guidelines for screening candidates applying for the position of Assistant Professor at Central University of Jharkhand. It outlines a 100 point scale for evaluating candidates based on their academic qualifications and experience. Points are awarded for grades obtained in graduation, post-graduation, M.Phil, Ph.D, research publications, teaching experience, and awards. Candidates will be shortlisted for interview based on total scores in descending order. In case of a tie, the candidate with higher marks at Master's level will be ranked higher. Screening scores will not impact final selection by the interview committee.

Uploaded by

Konark Raj
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

>kj[k.

M dsUnzh; fo”ofo|ky;] jk¡ph


Central University of Jharkhand, Ranchi
(Hkkjrh; laln ds vf/kfu;e] 2009 }kjk LFkkfir )
(A Central University established by an Act of Parliament of India in 2009)

Guidelines for Screening and / or Shortlisting of candidates for appointment to the post of Assistant
Professor in the University.
With a need to enable the duly constituted Selection Committee to have a comprehensive assessment of the
required number of candidates, who would appear before them, in a time bound manner, applications
received for the faculty position shall be screened/shortlisted on the basis of the academic and other related
credentials of the candidates through the criteria detailed in this document.
I. Criteria for evaluation of candidates for determining their eligibility for their shortlisting for the
interview.
For the post of Assistant Professor, the criteria for evaluation of candidates for determining their
eligibility for shortlisting shall be based on a 100 point scale. The distribution of marks will be as
follows:
Table I
Criteria for Short-listing of Candidates for Interview for the Post of Assistant Professors in the
Departments of the University
Sl. Academic Record Score
No.
1 Graduation 80% & 60% to less than
55% to less 45%to less than
Above = 15 80% = 13
than 60% =10 55% = 05
2 Post-Graduation 80% 60% to less than
55% (50% in case of SC / ST /
&Above=25 80% = 23
OBC (non-creamy layer) /
PwBD) to less than 60% = 20
3 M.Phil. 60% & 55% to less than 60% = 05
above = 07
4 Ph.D. 30
5 NET with JRF 07
6 NET 05
7 SLET/SET 03
Research Publications (2 10
marks for each research
publications published in
Peer-Reviewed or UGC-listed
Journals)
8 Teaching/Post Doctoral 10
Experience (2 marks for one
year each)#
9 Awards
International/National Level 03
(Awards given by
International
Organizations/Government of
Page 1 of 3
India / Government of India
recognized National Level
Bodies
State-Level (Awards given by 02
State Government)

#However, if the period of Teaching/Post-doctoral experience is less than one year, then the marks shall be
reduced proportionately.
Note:
(A)
i. M.Phil. + Ph.D. Maximum – 30 Marks
ii. JRF/NET Maximum – 07 Marks
iii. In a wards category Maximum – 03 Marks
(B)
Academic Score – 80
Research Publications – 10
Teaching Experience – 10
Total Score – 100

II. Shortlisting of candidates: Criteria and Process


1. The Screening Committee will draw a list of all the candidates indicating the marks scored by them in
descending order i.e. starting from the candidate getting the highest marks towards the candidates
getting the lower marks.
2. In case of tie in the marks of two or more candidates, the candidate having the higher/highest marks
at the Master’s level shall be ranked above the other(s).
3. The marks awarded to the candidates during the process of screening of applications shall not have
any weightage/credit or merit during assessment/interview of the candidates by the Selection
Committee as these marks shall be used only for screening/shortlisting purposes.
4. The time taken by candidates to acquire M.Phil. and / or Ph.D. Degree shall not be considered as
teaching/ research experience to be claimed for appointment to the teaching positions. Further the
period of active service spent on pursuing research degree simultaneously with teaching assignment
without taking any kind of leave, shall be counted as teaching experience for the purpose of direct
recruitment/ promotion.
5. In case of any dispute with regard to screening of the applications, the decision of the Competent
Authority shall be final.
6. The status of short-listing will be made available on the dashboards of the respective applicants for
information.
III. Important Note
1. The entire onus of the content/authenticity of the information being uploaded in the form of
application and its attachments shall exclusively rest with the applicant in terms of eligibility for
recruitment and for subsequent selection through due process.
2. The University shall, in no way, be responsible for any error/ omission/ commission/ suppression of
relevant information by the applicant knowingly/ unknowingly/ overtly/ covertly while filling up the
application form and uploading the documents required therein.
3. In case the applicant gets screened/shortlisted/selected/appointed on the basis of the credentials
furnished by him/her which are, on scrutiny, found to be incorrect inadmissible/ forged/ fabricated/
falsified, his/her candidature shall be liable to be cancelled at any stage of the recruitment/at any time

Page 2 of 3
during the tenure of the service and appropriate legal action under applicable law shall be initiated
against the applicant.
4. The University reserves the right to modify/withdraw/cancel any communication made to the
applicant. In case of any dispute arising out of such a situation, the decision of the University shall be
final and binding on the applicant.

*****

REGISTRAR

Page 3 of 3

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy