All Sem DE
All Sem DE
Contents:
FAQs 15
References 17
Appendices
On 2nd February, 2012 (The first cohort of 4-year degree engineering students graduated out
in May 2012.), GTU started the process of updating its syllabi. Being the most Innovative and
largest University of India, GTU always tries to cope up with all latest trends in Innovation,
Entrepreneurship and Technological advancement. In this regard, GTU has introduced a
creative and interactive practical approach in its syllabi named “Design Engineering” in AY
2014-15. Design Engineering is very unique and pioneering initiation of GTU based on
globally accepted and implemented techniques by designers and engineers called “Design
Thinking”. One of the key objectives of this initiation is to infuse the Design Thinking mind-
set into engineers of future with pervading the methodology into core subjects also. It is a
first of its kind initiation in the Indian Education System (In process branches such as
Chemical Engineering and IT, one uses the term ‘Project-based Learning’ for a similar idea).
Four modules, in Design Spine, have been introduced from 3rd to 6th semester in every
branch of the engineering curriculum of its all affiliating colleges across the Gujarat State.
To move a step forward in this direction, GTU’s Centre for Industrial Design (OPEN DESIGN
SCHOOL) has conducted a series of Faculty Development Programs (FDPs) to sensitize the
Design Driven Innovation for Faculty Members of various colleges and created different
frameworks/Canvases so that students can better learn the subject. So far, 36 FDPs have
been organized centrally at GTU till date, in which more than 2200 faculty members have
been trained for Design Thinking methodologyfrom around 125 Engineering colleges across
the states from more than 15 branches. Further one International conference and one
National Symposium have been organized by GTU to map the progress of the initiation as
well as to know the ground reality at the colleges by inviting academia, industry and policy
makers oncommonplatform, the very basic idea of these two events was to strengthen the
course by applying global practices in Design Thinking to achieve “Make in India” & “Start-
up India” initiatives of Honourable Prime Minister, Mr. Narendra Modi.
Observation
Test Empathy
Human
Centric
Approach
Prototype Ideation
Product
Development
Domain Empathy
•Intro to Design Thinking Identification •AEIOU Framework •Define the Problem
methodology •Role Playing Statement based on
•Importance •Select your area of •Identify empathy of User
interest for design •Interview Unarticulated/Unmet
•Design Process •And many more •Right problem leads
project needs of User you to right solution
•Design Elements •Branch specific or methods available •Pleasure and Pain
General domain points
Design Thinking •Story telling Define Design
Observation
- Intro Problem
Mind Mapping
Design Thinking is
Divergent-
SCAMPER tool Convergent process
Product Concept
• Revalidation Development •Very early & rough Finalization •Multiple ideas/solutions
prototype for problem
• Reject • Functions • After combining
•Made up of paper, •Refine the problem
• Redesign • Features cardboard, thermocole and refining, finally statement with possible
• Retain etc. whichever material select the concept solutions
• User Expereince •Opportunity mapping
is available for your problem
• Components
Customer Dirty statement
Feedback Ideation
Mock-ups
Fail fast to
succeed faster
Please refer next page for further process…….
The objective of using whole Design Thinking process in every semester and repeating it
again and again is to master the process so that irrespective of the problem and domain,
after study in their professional carrier, students would solve the problems easily
irrespective of domain as they would have mastered the process.By saying this, University
wants that the students will learn the process properly and focus on details of every stage.
The final outcome of the project is one of the important and desired evaluation criteria, but
one should also celebrate the failure. So we suggest the students that you should only focus
on the process of Design Thinking and do not worry about the final outcome, you can always
iterate and modify your concept at every stage. If one would follow the process accurately
then outcome would be definitely precise.
During their Bachelor of Engineering, students are learning the various principles and
aspects of engineering, through this Design Engineering course, university wants to
inculcate Design Mind-set/Attitude in the students so that students can use their
engineering/technical knowledge to create better solutions. Students and faculty members
need to relate the core subjects topics of respective semester and branch with their Design
Engineering projects as one of the key objectives of this initiation is to infuse the Design
Thinking mind-set into engineers of future with pervading the methodology into core
subjects also.
Post-graduate Research Centre for Industrial Design
OPEN DESIGN SCHOOL
Relevance
This course is meant for beginners. The course is designed to initiate Design Thinking
understanding for the 3rd semester students.
The course aims to expose the students to the basic process and framework of Design
Thinking and relevant tools & techniques for Creativity & Innovation.
Course Contents
This Course is designed to give very basic understanding of the Design Thinking
methodology. The content is divided into week-wise activities to better understand the
course and give enough time to all the learning parts of it, but depending upon the type and
nature of projects, students and guide may re-schedule the activities. In Design Engineering
– 1A, student will select very basic and small, individual or team project. This project would
be from very general topic/domain like designing something for
yourself/parents/Teacher/Friends. Whole class may select single project topic or similar
topic in different small groupsto have healthy competition among the class. This kind of
basic project would give good understanding of Design Thinking process. In this module
student will use whole Design Thinking process as shown above to complete their projects
but here the learning objective or focus would be on Observation or Empathy process. So
students need to give more time to these phases and then reach up to the rough prototype
phase.
Relevance
This is a revision course designed for those who have undergone the fundamentals of design
thinking process in 3rd semester.
The course aims to validate the learnings from the understanding design thinking course by
translating the concepts into exercises. Here branch specific topics need to be selected by
students and refine their learning for Design Thinking phases.
Course Contents
In the 3rd semester, students have learnt the basic Design Thinking methodology in DE-1A
and undergone the phases of the same with necessary tools and techniques. In 3rd
semester, if students have worked upon general topic/domain irrespective of their branch,
now in 4th semester they need to select branch specific existing artefact/component for
Reverse Engineering aspect and modify/redesign it as per the User’s needs using Design
Thinking. So that students will work on branch specific design projects and they would relate
all stages/phases of Design Engineering with their regular core subjects of particular branch
in further semester/s as one of the key objectives of Design Engineering subject is to absorb
Design Thinking approach into core engineering subject for practical learning. In this module
also whole Design Thinking process will be used by students, but more emphasis on Ideation
and initial Product Development phase.
Post-graduate Research Centre for Industrial Design
OPEN DESIGN SCHOOL
Relevance
This is a mid-level course designed for those who have undergone the fundamentals of
design thinking process in 2nd year.
The course aims to validate the learnings from the understanding design thinking course by
translating the concepts into exercises. In this module, students will work upon community
based projects to validate their learning of Design Thinking process.
Course Contents
Students have learnt the fundamentals of Design Thinking methodology in 2nd year and
successfully gone through the process twice while working on general as well as branch
specific topics. Now in 5th and 6th semester students need to work on community/society
based project and need to use whole design thinking process. Here in 5th semester
emphasis will be on Observation, Empathy and Ideation; while in 6 th semester emphasis will
be on product development, detail design, prototyping and validation of the solutions in real
environment. At this stage, it is essential to identify parameters and check five basic design
principles viz. 1) Technical, 2) Ergonomics, 3) Aesthetics, 4) Cost and 5) Environment keeping
System Approach in mind. Designing something new involves several iterations on different
stages/ components/ aspects. Before investing further resources in terms of time/ money/
manpower it is important to strengthen these five principles to advance for novelty. It will
include several rigorous iterative efforts to make final product/process.
Relevance
This is anadvance level course designed for those who have undergone the fundamentals of
design thinking process.
The course aims to validate the learnings from the understanding design thinking course by
translating the concepts into exercises. In this module, student will continue their work from
5th semester on Community based project and complete the Design Thinking cycle with
emphasis onproduct development, detail design, prototyping and validation of the solutions
in real environment.
Course Contents
Students have started community based projects and successfully gone through the process
of Observation, Empathy and Ideation in 5th semester. Now in 6th semester they will
continue their work from Ideation to product development, detail design, prototyping and
validation of the solutions in real environment.All students’ team need to work towards
final prototype and then test it in real environment. Final working model with YouTube
video link is required for this module.
In the 6th semester, student’s team will validate their concept and detailed design part with
reference to (1) Modelling and Analysis of their design (2) Prototyping and sequential
iteration of concepts, (3) Engineering Economics of Design, (4) Design for Use, Reuse and
Sustainability and (5) Test the prototype and additionally students will also learn topic like
(6) Ethics in Design.
What are the objectives or goals of GTU behind the introduction of this subject? Or Why
Design Engineering subject is introduced in curriculum?
An Engineer must be a problem solver. Keeping this thought in mind, GTU
introduced this Design Engineering course with ultimate goal of providing innovative
environment so that students can develop the mind-set to identify right problem and
then its solution.
The other important objective of University is to infuse the Design Thinking
knowledge to various core subjects of the particular branch to have pedagogical
innovation in Education System.
Also to cease the copy-paste type projects.
Learn the practical skills that are required in industry now-a-days.
What are the expectations of the industry today from their engineering staff?
Industries expect to hire an engineer who should have multidisciplinary knowledge,
who is a problem solver not only process manager. They require an engineer who
can work effectively in team, have hands-on experience and who are ready to
change or inculcate new things/knowledge/technology – an open minded personnel.
The objective of the Design Engineering course is to enhance the thinking ability and
change the mind-set of an engineering graduate in positive manner. What kind of
environment inside college should it be?
Creativity is inherent, but of course it would be enhanced by providing and creating
right environment for the students. For Design Thinking learning an open minded
environment in terms of type of projects, branch, skills, team size should be created
within institutions.
Concept note for GTU’s - Centre for Industrial Design (OPEN Design School)
http://files.gtu.ac.in/circulars/14SEP/25092014Centre%20for%20Indusrial%20Design.pdf
Report on National Symposium on Role of Design in Make in India and Start up India:
https://goo.gl/610irH
Relevance
This course is meant for beginners. The course is designed to initiate Design Thinking
understanding for the 3rd semester students.
The course aims to expose students to the basic process and framework of Design Thinking
and relevant tools & techniques for Creativity & Innovation.
Course Contents
This Course is designed to give very basic understanding of the Design Thinking
methodology. The content is divided into week-wise activities to better understand the
course and to give enough time to all the learning aspects, but depending upon the type and
nature of projects, students and guide may re-schedule the activities.
In Design Engineering – 1A, student will select very basic and small, individual or team
project irrespective of their branch. This project would be from very general topic/domain
like designing something for yourself/parents/Teacher/Friends (Whole class may select
single project topic or similar topic in different small groups to have healthy competition
among the class). This kind of basic project would give good understanding of Design
Thinking process. In this module, student will use whole Design Thinking process as shown
in guideline document to complete their projects but here the learning objective or focus
would be more on Observation or Empathy process. So students need to give more time to
these phases and then reach up to the rough prototype phase. Students in 3rd semester
need to follow below week-wise activities to complete the course requirement for 3rd
semester.
Post-graduate Research Centre for Industrial Design
OPEN DESIGN SCHOOL
Design Thinking Process – with Tools & Techniques
Module 1: DE-1A Understanding Design Thinking
Broad segment Week Description Operational need
B. AEIOU framework
C. Mind Map
D. Empathy Map
E. Ideation Canvas
F. Product Development Canvas (PDC)
G. Rough prototype model/Conceptual Plan-Layout for process related branches
H. Individual Log Book (duly signed by faculty guide)
Note: As per the guidelines and evaluation schemes given in this document, students need
to prepare report for their projects. Separate report format will not be provided by
University.
To,
Students deserve a proper practical/ viva/ project examination of the work that they have
done over the semester (or over the year for a 2-semester project).
It is the responsibility of the University and Colleges that all its examinations are conducted
fairly, sincerely and with due diligence.
1. Please make proper arrangements so that all the examinations start in-time. If due to
any reason, the exam should not start at the right time, please inform the examiners
that they should take extra time. But in no case the viva/ practical exam be conducted in
a hurry without giving sufficient time for evaluation of every student. If an exam is
scheduled to be held over two days, please make the necessary arrangements.
2. The University expects the Deans (and or special teams headed by the Dean or his/
her nominee) to visit the Colleges during the practical/ viva examinations.
3. Please see that all the necessary help and information is provided. Please receive
them so that they can do their job properly without wasting their time in searching for
the place and in contacting the concerned examiners and students. If they should
want to visit the laboratories/ workshops, please make the necessary arrangements.
4. Please inform the external examiner that he/ she must note down the best 3 projects
of the department and convey the details of such projects by uploading the details of
the project or/ and the complete project report on the University’s server or send it to
design@gtu.edu.in .
5. In case Internet or the server should not work, please provide the technical help to the
external examiner for preparing a CD of the reports of the best three projects of every
department and please make arrangements to deliver the CD to the examination
department of the University.
A Viva-Voce examination will be conducted at the end of the semester by a team of two
examiners, one of whom will be an internal Faculty Member, who may have taught the
subject. (Internal examiner must remain the same throughout the entire of examination for
batch). The other will be an external examiner to be appointed by the University. Both
examiners must be trained in Design Thinking through the FDP conducted by University.
(Please note that all the, other than DE subject, practical and viva voce examinations at the
end of the 3rd semester will be conducted internally by the College/ Institute.)
EVALUATION SCHEME:
Sr. Sub-Head
Particular
No. Weightage
Understanding of Design Thinking methodology/ need
1. 15
Importance of various Learning tools of Design Thinking
Total Marks for the subject: 100 (Practical viva – 80 (External – 40 & Internal – 40),
Internal continuous evaluation – 20)
Minimum passing marks: 40/80
Ratio of evaluation by internal & external examiner appointed: 50% in each sub-head
Examiner essentially needs to evaluate the learning process of the student during the
semester, not only the final outcome. As outcome is important for any project but during
the student stage, projects are intended for practical learning and “Learning by doing” is
the Mantra for Design Engineering subject (One should celebrate the failure also and learn
from it to get success). So please evaluate the process properly with giving sufficient time
for each project.
Students need to explain all canvases prepared in hard copy to the panel of
examiners (internal and external).
Power point presentation is not mandatory.
Relevance
This is a revision course designed for those who have undergone the fundamentals of Design
Thinking process in 3rd semester.
The course aims to validate the learnings from previous semester of the understanding Design
Thinking, by translating the concepts into exercises. Here branch specific topics need to be
selected by students and refine their learning for Design Thinking phases.
Course Contents
In the 3rd semester, students have learnt the basic Design Thinking methodology in DE-1A and
undergone the phases of the same with necessary tools and techniques using various
framework and canvases. In 3rd semester, students have worked upon general topic/domain
irrespective of their branch, now in 4th semester they need to select branch specific existing
artefact/component for Reverse Engineering and modify/redesign it as per the User’s needs
using Design Thinking. There are two basic objectives of introducing RE: (1) Students will learn
some basic concept from their branch and relate all stages/phases of Design Engineering with
their regular core subjects of particular branch in current or further semester/s as one of the
key objectives of Design Engineering subject is to absorb Design Thinking approach into core
engineering subject for practical learning (2) they will use Design Thinking process again to
refine the learning. In this module also whole Design Thinking process will be used by students,
but more emphasis on Ideation and initial Product Development phase. The content is divided
into week-wise activities to better understand the course and to give enough time to all the
Post-graduate Research Centre for Industrial Design
OPEN DESIGN SCHOOL
learning aspects, but depending upon the type and nature of projects, students and guide may
re-schedule the activities.
Students in 4th semester need to follow below week-wise activities to complete the course
requirement for 4th semester.
5. Rough Prototype
Each group has to select one branch specific component/product/artefact/program for reverse
engineering activity for their DE-1B project and modify the same based on extracted
information as per User’s needs. This activity is to learn about some basic technical aspects
involved in designing something related to particular branch.
[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_engineering
After Reverse Engineering study, with extracted information from branch specific
artefact/component, Students’ team need to apply Design Thinking approach learnt in 3 rd
semester (all phases of 3rd semester DE-1A would repeat here) to modify/redesign that selected
artefact/component based on User’s unmet needs. Here one need to make all canvases and
framework again as topic is different than 3 rd semester.
Activity 02 – User Feedback based refinement and redesign (Using Design Thinking Process
learnt in 3rd semester, for further refinement of learning)
After Reverse Engineering phase, Students must have to verify their revised concepts of
selected artefact/component with the user before investing their time and efforts further. This
will help students to verify their concepts and help in clarifying the insights that they need for
implementing their idea. Students will again visit the domain/area of their selected
artefact/component for reverse engineering and verify their modification approach taken up in
the PD canvas with the user for functions, features and components. At this stage, one may find
that one has to modify the prepared Canvases on the basis of feedback given by user.
After carrying out the feedback analysis, students are required to verify the important aspects,
in line with the context of five principles, namely:
i. Technological,
ii. Aesthetic,
iii. Ergonomics,
iv. Environment, and
v. Cost.
For the design problem, each of their components, functions and features of the proposed
solution will be checked using the above five principles. This verification may lead to
modification and improving of their concept.
Each student will search at least 2 most relevant research and development work through
journals, patent databases, literature of similar products and any other resource, which can
provide information related to their product/ idea/ concept. The students are expected to read
thoroughly these documents and make a summary (2-3 pages) of the work described in the
documents in their own words. This exercise will ensure, to some extent, the novelty of the idea,
as well as enable students to understand on-going works in the field, relevant to their project.
Phase 2: Pre-Design
Now, after getting feedback from Users on the modification requirements and finalization on
which concept the team will work, students need to work on Pre-Design phase. Basic Pre-design
calculations which roughly decide size/shape/material requirements/manufacturing
process/design specifications/applicable standards etc. needs to be identified. Students’ need
to work on identifying the learning needs in Phase 2 that would help to complete the projects
further as well as in their professional career. These needs would be mostly industrial/practical
needs which are not included in the regular BE syllabus and are important for the students’ to
learn the skillsets required by the industry.
Every group of students, with the guidance of their Faculty Guide, need to identify at this stage,
the needs for the generic learning, required while they develop their idea. The learning
requirements will depend upon and may be specific for the concept/idea for their solution. This
will help students to do the research in a timely manner so that they are able to obtain the
specific learning/ understanding, they would require for designing the product.
With understanding of the basic branch/ project related subjects, (after having discussions with
and the guidance of their Faculty Guide) students will be able to identify tools/ use of software/
applicable standards/ material / design specifications/ theories/ principles/ methods/
experiments related needs to be acquired by them to complete their projects successfully.
After identifying the specific learning that will be required to develop their
idea/product/concept further, the students have to distribute learning requirements among the
members of the group and each member has to learn minimum one component of LNM, in
consultation with the Faculty Guide. Students need to make LNM and include it in their report.
LNM would include four major aspects as below:
a) The requirements of the core discipline should be identified, may be in relation with the
topic of projects, to better correlate the learnings. At the same time the group has to
work out the learning needs of the inter-disciplinary domains. The learning
responsibilities shall be distributed equally among the group members. Also all
learnings requirement to be brought on a mutually fixed timeline.
b) Here do not concentrate only the requirements that are useful for current project, but
aim for gaining practical learning/skillset that is required by industry, but try to learn
gradually all the required skills before graduation.
c) Students (along with faculties) shall identify practical limitations due to non-coverage in
syllabus to develop their product and focus on the same from the early stages (i.e. Sem.
4) so that development (manufacturing level detailing) of their project, as desired, can
be finished.
d) Student must learn at-least one component in Sem. 4 which may be learnt in greater
details in the rest of the semesters. The students, with the help of the Faculty Guide, will
need to prioritize the learning needs and the level of understanding required. However,
basis of interest, students may learn more than one components identified in LNM.
e) The students may prepare a comprehensive LNM for the learning needs for their idea/
concept/projects. Also, they may prepare one LNM showing assigned learnings to each
individual. Ideally, students need to prepare timeline for all the stages of LNM by the
end of the 4th semester with aim of learning at least one component by each group
members.
Proof of Concept
This would be the very early stage of prototyping technique where the objective is “To succeed
faster, you need to fail fast” to save on energy, time and money. So failure in projects shall be
welcomed by students and faculty members to learn from it.
Note: As per the guidelines and evaluation schemes given in this document, students need
to prepare report for their projects. Separate report format will not be provided by
University.
Students deserve a proper practical/ viva/ project examination of the work that they have
done over the semester (or over the year for a 2-semester project).
It is the responsibility of the University and Colleges that all its examinations are conducted
fairly, sincerely and with due diligence.
1. Please make proper arrangements so that all the examinations start in-time. If due to
any reason, the exam should not start at the right time, please inform the examiners
that they should take extra time. But in no case the viva/ practical exam be conducted in
a hurry without giving sufficient time for evaluation of every student. If an exam is
scheduled to be held over two days, please make the necessary arrangements.
2. The University expects the Deans (and or special teams headed by the Dean or his/
her nominee) to visit the Colleges during the practical/ viva examinations.
3. Please see that all the necessary help and information is provided. Please receive
them so that they can do their job properly without wasting their time in searching for
the place and in contacting the concerned examiners and students. If they should
want to visit the laboratories/ workshops, please make the necessary arrangements.
4. Please inform the external examiner that he/ she must note down the best 3 projects
of the department and convey the details of such projects by uploading the details of
the project or/ and the complete project report on the University’s server or send it to
design@gtu.edu.in.
5. In case Internet or the server should not work, please provide the technical help to the
external examiner for preparing a CD of the reports of the best three projects of every
department and please make arrangements to deliver the CD to the examination
department of the University.
A Viva-Voce examination will be conducted at the end of the semester by a team of two
examiners, one of whom will be an internal Faculty Member, who may have taught the subject
(Internal examiner must remain the same throughout the entire of examination for batch). The
other will be an external examiner to be appointed by the University. Both examiners must be
trained in Design Thinking through the FDP conducted by University.
(Please note that all the other practical and viva voce examinations at the end of the 4th
semester will be conducted internally by the College/ Institute.)
EVALUATION SCHEME:
Sr. Sub-Head
Particular
no. Weightage
Phase 1: Reverse Engineering (RE)
Selection of Branch specific component/product/artefact/program 15
1.
Disassembly/Analysis of the component/product/artefact/program
and learning about the topic
User Feedback based refinement and redesign of the RE topic based on
3rd semester learning
Understanding of User’s need for Reverse Engineering topic and
2. preparation of canvases/framework for this topic (AEIOU, Mind 15
Mapping, Empathy mapping, ideation, product development)
Prior art search (Two Papers study and summary reports)
Summary of the learning from Reverse Engineering activity
Phase 2: Pre-Design
Learning Need Matrix (LNM) and the skill set learnt in this semester
so far 15
3.
Basic Pre-design calculation which roughly decide size/shape/material
requirement/manufacturing process/design specifications/applicable
standards
Phase 3: Proof of Concept
4. 15
Dirty Mock-ups/ Fast-prototype/ Schematic plan
5. Log book (Individual completed log book, duly signed by guide regularly) 10
80
Total Marks for the subject: 100 (Practical viva – 80 (External – 40 & Internal – 40),
Internal continuous evaluation – 20)
Minimum passing marks: 40/80
Ratio of evaluation by internal & external examiner appointed: 50% in each sub-head
Examiner essentially needs to evaluate the learning process of the student during the
semester, not only the final outcome. As outcome is important for any project but during
the student stage, projects are intended for practical learning and “Learning by doing” is
the Mantra for Design Engineering subject (One should celebrate the failure also and learn
from it to get success). So please evaluate the process properly with giving sufficient time
for each project.
Students need to explain all canvases prepared in hard copy to the panel of
examiners (internal and external).
Power point presentation is not mandatory.
Relevance
This is a mid-level course designed for those who have undergone the fundamentals of Design
Thinking process in 2nd year and understand the importance and process completely.
The course aims to validate the learnings from the understanding Design Thinking course, by
translating the concepts into exercises. In this module, students will work upon community
based projects to validate their learning of Design Thinking process.
Course Contents
Students have learnt the fundamentals of Design Thinking methodology in 2nd year and
successfully gone through the process twice while working on general as well as branch specific
topics. Now in 5th and 6th semester, being a socially responsible engineer, students need to
work on community/society based project using Design Thinking process. Here in 5th semester
emphasis would be on Observation, Empathy, Ideation and Product Development; while in 6th
semester emphasis will be on detail design, prototyping and validation of the solutions in real
environment. At this stage, it is essential to identify parameters and check five basic design
principles viz. 1) Technical, 2) Ergonomics, 3) Aesthetics , 4) Cost and 5) Environment keeping
System Approach in mind. Designing something new involves several iterations on different
stages/ components/ aspects. Before investing further resources in terms of time/ money/
manpower it is important to strengthen these five principles to advance for novelty. It will
include several rigorous iterative efforts to make final product/process.
Post-graduate Research Centre for Industrial Design
OPEN DESIGN SCHOOL
It is essential for students to enhance and refine their learning by using Design Thinking
process, keeping System Approach in mind while working on projects.
The content is divided into week-wise activities to better understand the course and to give
enough time to all the learning aspects, but depending upon the type and nature of projects,
students and guide may re-schedule the activities. Students in 5th semester need to follow
below week-wise activities to complete the course requirement for 5 th semester.
By the end of 5th semester, student’s team will be ready with their well-defined Design Problem
and probable solutions to that problem as shown in above table.
Note: As per the guidelines and evaluation schemes given in this document, students need
to prepare report for their projects. Separate report format will not be provided by
University.
To,
Students deserve a proper practical/ viva/ project examination of the work that they have
done over the semester (or over the year for a 2-semester project).
It is the responsibility of the University and Colleges that all its examinations are conducted
fairly, sincerely and with due diligence.
1. Please make proper arrangements so that all the examinations start in-time. If due to
any reason, the exam should not start at the right time, please inform the examiners
that they should take extra time. But in no case the viva/ practical exam be conducted in
a hurry without giving sufficient time for evaluation of every student. If an exam is
scheduled to be held over two days, please make the necessary arrangements.
2. The University expects the Deans (and or special teams headed by the Dean or his/
her nominee) to visit the Colleges during the practical/ viva examinations.
3. Please see that all the necessary help and information is provided. Please receive
them so that they can do their job properly without wasting their time in searching for
the place and in contacting the concerned examiners and students. If they should
want to visit the laboratories/ workshops, please make the necessary arrangements.
4. Please inform the external examiner that he/ she must note down the best 3 projects
of the department and convey the details of such projects by uploading the details of
the project or/ and the complete project report on the University’s server or send it to
design@gtu.edu.in .
5. In case Internet or the server should not work, please provide the technical help to the
external examiner for preparing a CD of the reports of the best three projects of every
department and please make arrangements to deliver the CD to the examination
department of the University.
A Viva-Voce examination will be conducted at the end of the semester by a team of two
examiners, one of whom will be an internal Faculty Member, who may have taught the
subject. (Internal examiner must remain the same throughout the entire of examination for
batch). The other will be an external examiner to be appointed by the University. Both
examiners must be trained in Design Thinking through the FDP conducted by University.
(Please note that all the other practical and viva voce examinations at the end of the 5th
semester will be conducted internally by the College/Institute.)
EVALUATION SCHEME:
Sr. Sub-Head
Particular
No. Weightage
Observation towards Empathy
Field Activity/observation and outcome
1. 20
Mind Mapping-Summarization and data analysis
Observation Technique (AEIOU Summary)
Log book (Individual completed log book, duly signed by guide
2. 10
regularly)
Design Problem Definition
3. Secondary research/ Prior art search 10
Diachronic and Synchronic analysis
Canvases/Frameworks
AEIOU, Mind Mapping
4. Empathy mapping 15
Ideation Canvas
Product development
5. Pre-Design Calculations 15
Total Marks for the subject: 100 (Practical viva – 80 (External – 40 & Internal – 40),
Internal continuous evaluation – 20)
Minimum passing marks: 40/80
Ratio of evaluation by internal & external examiner appointed: 50% in each sub-head
Examiner essentially needs to evaluate the learning process of the student during the
semester, not only the final outcome. As outcome is important for any project but during
the student stage, projects are intended for practical learning and “Learning by doing” is
the Mantra for Design Engineering subject (One should celebrate the failure also and learn
from it to get success). So please evaluate the process properly with giving sufficient time
for each project.
Students need to explain all canvases prepared in hard copy to the panel of
examiners (internal and external).
Power point presentation is not mandatory.
Relevance
This is an advance level course designed for those who have undergone the fundamentals of
Design Thinking process and understand the importance and process completely.
The course aims to validate the learnings from the understanding Design Thinking course by
translating the concepts into exercises. In this module, student will continue their work from 5 th
semester on Community based project and complete the Design Thinking cycle with emphasis
on product development, detail design, prototyping and validation of the solutions in real
environment.
Course Contents
Students have started community based projects and successfully gone through the process of
Observation, Empathy, Ideation and initial stages of Product Development in 5th semester. Now
in 6th semester, they will continue their work from concept to product development, detail
design, prototyping and validation of the solutions in real environment. All students’ team need
to work towards final prototype and then test it in real environment. Final working model with
YouTube video link is required for this module.
In 6th semester, students will consider various design considerations as described further in this
document for detail design and then first prepare their models in software if required and then
use prototyping techniques to further build the concepts. The content is divided into week-wise
activities to better understand the course and to give enough time to all the learning aspects,
but depending upon the type and nature of projects, students and guide may re-schedule the
Post-graduate Research Centre for Industrial Design
OPEN DESIGN SCHOOL
activities. Students in 6th semester need to follow below week-wise activities to complete the
course requirement for 6th semester.
In the 6th semester, student’s team will validate their concept and detailed design part with
reference to (1) Design for performance, safety and reliability, (2) Design for Ergonomics and
Aesthetics, (3) Design for Manufacturing & Assembly (DFMA), (4) Design for cost &
Environment, (5) Modelling and Analysis of their design (6) Prototyping (7) Engineering
Economics of Design, (8) Design for Use, Reuse and Sustainability and (9) Test the prototype.
And additionally students will also learn topic like (10) Ethics in Design.
1
Definition by IEEE.
Learning Design Thinking at Gujarat Technological University Page 4
For any query, kindly write to: design@gtu.edu.in
Post-graduate Research Centre for Industrial Design
OPEN DESIGN SCHOOL
eliminate waste of material and time. Iteration on involved raw materials may be
performed to check available alternatives – as materials play a major role in production
cost. Basic guidelines may be followed as below:
Check for alternative and compatible raw materials (Refer/ revise to LNM)
Minimize the number of parts (Refer/ revise to PDC)
Develop a modular design
Design parts to be multi-functional
Design parts for multiple-use
Design for ease of fabrication/ production/ assemble
Minimize assembly paths
Avoid separate fasteners (i.e. monolithic units)
Eliminate adjustments as possible (i.e. movement in parts addressing multiple use –
it’s a trade-off)
Design for minimum handling
Avoid use of additional tools when possible
Minimize subassemblies (i.e. joining and removing some of the parts)
Use standard parts when possible (refer/ revise to LNM)
Simplify operations
Design for efficient and adequate testing (refer/ revise to LNM)
Use repeatable & understood processes
Analyze failures
Rigorously assess value (i.e. cost of production against minimizing cost of human
efforts being done at present – Refer to AEIOU observation framework)
[1]
Engineering Design – A project Based Introduction by Clive L. Dym, Patrick Little, Elizabeth J.
Orwin – Wiley publications
Optional Areas:
GTU Innovation Council will help in below areas for the students whose projects are innovative
& extraordinary and who really want to develop their projects further. Visit
http://www.gtuinnovationcouncil.ac.in/ for more info.
Design Support
Intellectual Property Right
Business Model Canvas
Student Start-up
Incubation and Co-working space
Note: As per the guidelines and evaluation schemes given in this document, students need
to prepare report for their projects. Separate report format will not be provided by
University.
To,
Students deserve a proper practical/ viva/ project examination of the work that they have
done over the semester (or over the year for a 2-semester project).
It is the responsibility of the University and Colleges that all its examinations are conducted
fairly, sincerely and with due diligence.
1. Please make proper arrangements so that all the examinations start in-time. If due to
any reason, the exam should not start at the right time, please inform the examiners
that they should take extra time. But in no case the viva/ practical exam be conducted in
a hurry without giving sufficient time for evaluation of every student. If an exam is
scheduled to be held over two days, please make the necessary arrangements.
2. The University expects the Deans (and or special teams headed by the Dean or his/
her nominee) to visit the Colleges during the practical/ viva examinations.
3. Please see that all the necessary help and information is provided. Please receive
them so that they can do their job properly without wasting their time in searching for
the place and in contacting the concerned examiners and students. If they should
want to visit the laboratories/ workshops, please make the necessary arrangements.
4. Please inform the external examiner that he/ she must note down the best 3 projects
of the department and convey the details of such projects by uploading the details of
the project or/ and the complete project report on the University’s server or send it to
design@gtu.edu.in .
5. In case Internet or the server should not work, please provide the technical help to the
external examiner for preparing a CD of the reports of the best three projects of every
department and please make arrangements to deliver the CD to the examination
department of the University.
A Viva-Voce examination will be conducted at the end of the semester by a team of two
examiners, one of whom will be an internal Faculty Member, who may have taught the
subject. (Internal examiner must remain the same throughout the entire of examination for
batch). The other will be an external examiner to be appointed by the University. Both
examiners must be trained in Design Thinking through the FDP conducted by University.
(Please note that all the other practical and viva voce examinations at the end of the 6th
semester will be conducted internally by the College/ Institute.)
EVALUATION SCHEME:
Sr. Sub-Head
Particular
No. Weightage
Design calculation (it may include size & shape specifications,
tolerances, material requirement, standards/safety rules/govt.
policies, sketches, detail & assembly drawings, list of components
with specifications etc.) These all aspects are case sensitive so one
can add/remove some aspects from the list.
For CE, IT, other process related branches, one may also use Flow
chart/Block Diagrams/Algorithms/Programming etc.
Measuring Instruments/techniques - knowledge and use
Comparison of existing materials, methods, tools and equipment
for your project
80
Note:
Total Marks for the subject: 100 (Practical viva – 80 (External – 40 & Internal – 40),
Internal continuous evaluation – 20)
Minimum passing marks: 40/80
Ratio of evaluation by internal & external examiner appointed: 50% in each sub-head
Examiner essentially needs to evaluate the learning process of the student during the
semester, not only the final outcome. As outcome is important for any project but during
the student stage, projects are intended for practical learning and “Learning by doing” is
the Mantra for Design Engineering subject (One should celebrate the failure also and learn
from it to get success). So please evaluate the process properly with giving sufficient time
for each project.
Students need to explain all canvases prepared in hard copy to the panel of
examiners (internal and external).
Power point presentation is not mandatory.
Note: In final year, students will use their learning of Design Thinking from these four
modules of DE-1A, 1B, 2A, 2B to complete their IDP/UDP projects. There would not be
separate Design Engineering subject in final year. On successfully completion of these four
modules and repeating Design Thinking process again and again, students would be able to
use it effectively and can solve any problem with creativity.