Final Transcript
Final Transcript
Break-even point
Is the point in the volume of activity where the organization’s revenues and expenses are equal
Sales 250,000
Less: variable expenses (150,000)
Contribution margin 100,000
Less: fixed expenses 100,000
Net Income 0
CM per unit in peso = Selling price per unit – Variable cost per unit
CM ratio = CM/Sales
Breakeven point in units = fixed cost/ CM per unit
Breakeven point in peso = fixed cost/ CM Ratio
Safety Margin
Difference between budgeted sales revenue and breakeven sales revenue
Amount by which sales can drop before losses occur.
Margin of safety in units = Sales units – Breakeven point units
Margin of safety in peso = Sales – Breakeven point
Margin of safety ratio = Margin of safety/ Sales
Sales mix
More than one product
Relative combination in which a company’s products are sold.
Different products have different selling prices, cost structures, and contribution margins.
Weighted contribution = CM/ % of total units
weighted average unit contribution margin = sum of weighted contribution
Break even point = fixed expenses/ weighted average unit contribution margin
Individual sales = breakeven point * % of total units
Overhead costs like setup, inspection, and material handling are fixed with respect to sales volume
but they are not fixed with respect to other cost drivers. This is the fundamental distinction between
a traditional CVP analysis and an activity-based costing CVP analysis.
ABC Steps
Overhead cost drivers are determined
Activity cost pools are created
o An activity cost pool is a pool of individual costs that all have the same cost driver.
All overhead costs are then allocated to one of the activity costs pools.
An overhead rate is then calculated for each cost pool using the following formula:
o Costs in activity cost pool/base
o The base is the cost driver.
Overhead costs are then allocated to each product according to how much of each base the product
uses.
OH rate = costs in activity cost pool/ base
Manufacturing Systems
Traditional
o “Just-incase”
Inventories of raw materials are maintained just in case some items are of poor
quality or key suppliers don’t deliver on time
o Push approach manufacturing
Materials are purchased through the manufacturing process
o Based on standard costs. Once a standard is reached improvement ceases.
Progressive
o “Just in Time”
Raw materials arrive just in time for use in production.
Finished goods are manufactured just in time to meet customers need.
o Pull approach manufacturing
Raw materials are not put into process until the next department requests them.
o Continuous quality improvement.
o Three important elements must exist for JITS systems to work:
Dependable suppliers who can deliver on short notice.
Multiskilled workforce who can work in work cells or work stations.
One worker may operate several kinds of machines.
Total quality management. Objective is no defects.
o Objectives of JIT
Reduction or elimination of inventories
Enhanced production quality
Reduction or elimination of rework costs
Control of Costs
Stability of costs does not necessarily indicate efficiency
Comparison of actual costs to standard, rather than to historical cost, will help control costs and
promote efficiency.
Standard costs are usually determined for a period of one year and are revised annually.
Types of Standards
A standard is a norm against which the actual performance can be measured
o Ideal standard – a standard that a company sets in which they meet their maximum degree
of efficiency. Does not take inefficient conditions into consideration.
o Attainable standard – includes factors such as lost time and normal waste spoilage.
Standard Cost Procedures
Standard costs are determined for the three elements of cost – direct materials, direct labor, and
factory overhead.
The standard costs, the actual costs, and the variance between the actual and standard costs are
recorded in appropriate accounts.
Significant variances are analyzed and investigated and appropriate action is taken.
Determining Variances
A variance is the difference between the actual and the standard costs of materials, labor, and
overhead.
The difference may be in usage and in prices
Materials Price Variance
o Indicates the difference between actual and standard unit cost times the actual quantity of
materials used.
o MPV = (AP – SP) * AQ
Material Quantity Variance
o Represents the difference between actual quantity of materials used and standard quantity
allowed times the standard unit cost of materials
o MQV = (AQ-SQ) * SP
Labor Rate Variance
o Indicated the difference between actual and standard labor rate times the actual hours
worked
o LRV = (ALR – SLR) X AH
Labor Efficiency Variance
o Represents the difference between actual quantity of labor worked and standard quantity
allowed times the standard rate per hour.
o LEV = (AH – SH) * SLR
2. Work in Process xx
Labor Rate Variance xx
Labor Efficiency Variance xx
Payroll xx
To record the entry for direct labor cost
3. Work in Process xx
Applied Factory Overhead xx
To record the entry applying factory overhead to work in process
4. Finished Goods xx
Work in Process xx
To record the entry for finished goods at standard cost
Analysis of Variances
Possible reasons for materials price variance
o Inefficient purchasing methods.
o Use of a slightly different material that the standard called for.
o Increase in market price.
Reasons for materials usage variance.
o Materials were spoiled or wasted.
o More materials were used as an experiment to upgrade the quality of the product.
Two-Variance Method
Divides the total variance into two parts
o Controllable variance
The amount by which the actual overhead costs differ from the standard overhead
costs for the attained level of production.
o Volume variance
The difference between budgeted fixed overhead and the fixed overhead applied to
work in process.
Four-Variance Method
Recognizes two variable cost variances and two fixed cost variances.
Cost variances
o Variable overhead spending variance
o Variable overhead efficiency variance
Fixed cost variances
o Fixed overhead budget variance
o Fixed overhead volume variance
Three-Variance Method
Separates actual and applied overhead into three variances
o Budget variance or spending variance
o Capacity variance
o Efficiency variance
Not as common as two variance methods but frequently used by manufacturers.
Pricing and Profitability Analysis
Demand and Supply
Holding all else equal, in a competitive market, customers will buy more at lower prices and less at
higher prices.
Factors affecting demand:
o Consumer income, Price relative to purchasing power
o Quality of goods offered for sale, Product durability
o Availability of substitutes
o Demand for complementary goods
Price Elasticity
Measured as the percentage change in quantity dived by the percentage change in price
If demand is relatively elastic, a small percent change in price will lead to a greater percent change in
quantity demanded. Demand is elastic if a price increase has a large negative impact on sales
volume.
Inelastic demand is when a buyer's demand for a product does not change as much as its change in
price.
Price
Amount that is given up in exchange to acquire a good or service
Effects: Measure of sacrifice and Information cue
Importance to managers
o Revenue: price charged to customer multiplies by the no. of units sold
o Profit: revenue minus expenses
Pricing objectives
Need to be specific, attainable, and measurable
Categories
o Profit oriented
o Sales oriented
o Status quo
Marker Structure
Control over No. of firms Types of goods barriers
price
Perfectly None Many small Identical, homogenous Very low Easy No special
Competitive firms, not unique entry and exit expenses
thousands
Monopolistic Some Many small Similar but with Low Advertising,
firms, some unique features, coupons, cost of
hundreds differentiation
Oligopoly A lot Few or tens Same or different. fairly High, cost Cost of
unique related differentiation,
barrier rebates, coupon
Monopoly Total One Very unique Very high Legal and
lobbying expen.
Price waterfall. Pricing waterfalls are classic tools used to measure the various steps of how the
price for a product cascade down to the pocket margin, also referred to as NET or NET 3
margins. These most commonly align with how retailers identify the various contributors to their
margin.
Measuring Profit
Profit. A measure of the difference between what a firm puts into making and selling a product or
service and what it receives.
Reasons for measuring profit
o Determine the capability of the firm
o Measure managerial performance
o Determine whether or not a firm adheres to government regulations.
o Signal the market about the opportunities for others to earn a profit.
Absorption Costing Approach to Measuring Profit
Also called full costing
Required for external financial reporting
Assigns all manufacturing costs, DM, DL, Variable OH and a share of fixed overhead to each unit of
product
o Each unit of product absorbs some of the fixed manufacturing OH in addition to its variable
manufacturing costs
Advantages Disadvantages
Price covers all costs
Perceived as equitable
Comparison with competitors
Used for external reporting
o
If Then
Customer Profitability
Customer profitability (CP) is the profit the firm makes from serving a customer or customer group
over a specified period of time, specifically the difference between the revenues earned from and
the costs associated with the customer relationship in a specified period.
Customer profitability analysis makes use of the following formula to determine profitability: Total
profit per customer = Total annual revenue generated - Total costs incurred.
Customer profitability analysis allows you to segment your customers by their profit contribution to
your brand and optimize your marketing, customer service, and operations costs around the
customer segments who are the most profitable for your brand.
Consumer penalty
Extra fee paid by the consumer for violating the terms of the purchase agreement
Businesses impose penalties when
o They suffer irrevocable revenue loss
o They incur significant additional transaction costs if customers are unable or unwilling to
complete their purchase obligations.
Budgeting
Profit planning refers to the short-term setting of goals and objectives on how to become profitable
There is a need to plan and budget resources to determine how to properly maximize these
resources for the attainment of the entity’s goals and objectives.
Budgeting now comes as a highly important factor in planning business operations
What is budgeting?
Budgeting is the process where an entity translates their operations in quantitative terms to
represent it as its planned operations, activities, and production for a specific time period in
consideration
Budgeting helps in:
o Planning operations
o Controlling operations
o Cost management
Objectives of budgeting
A budget should be able to provide a realistic estimate of income and expenses
A budget should provide a coordinated plan of action for the entity
A budget should serve as a control mechanism that can be used in performance evaluation by being
able to check results and suggest future corrective actions.
A budget should provide guidance to the management
A budget should help in decision-making
A budget should be able to improve communication, coordination, and harmonious operations
within the entity.
Budgeting helps in planning, performance evaluation, coordination, control, motivation, and
promoting positive behavior.
Benefits of budgeting
It compels managers to think ahead
It provides an opportunity to reevaluate existing activities and evaluate new ones
It aids managers in communicating objectives and coordinating actions across the organization.
It provides benchmarks to evaluate subsequent performance.
Master Budget
A master budget is regarded as a comprehensive financial planning tool that highlights operating
budgets, budgeted financial statements, and a financial plan.
Sales budget
Schedule of cash collections
Production budget
Direct materials budget
Cash budget
Budgeted Income Statement
Other budgeted schedules
Decentralized Organizations
Decentralization is a business structure in which the decision-making is made at various levels of the
organization. Typically, decentralized businesses are divided into smaller segments or groups in order
to make it easier to measure the performance of the company and the individuals within each of the
sub-groups.
o In order to be successful, a company must work hard to develop strategic competitive
advantages that distinguish the company from its peers.
o The organizational structure must allow the organization to quickly adapt and take
advantage of opportunities.
o Many organizations adopt a decentralized management structure in order to maintain a
competitive advantage.
Advantages
o Quick decision and response times – decisions made and implemented in a timely manner.
In order to remain competitive, it is important for organizations to take advantage of
opportunities that fit the organization’s strategy.
o Better ability to expand company – it is important for organizations to constantly explore
new opportunities to provide goods and services to its customers
o Skilled and/or specialized management – organizations must invest in developing highly
skilled employees who are able to make sound decisions that help the organization achieve
its goals.
o Increased morale of employees – the success of an organizations depends on its ability to
obtain, develop, and retain highly motivated employees. Empowering employees to make
decisions is one way to help increase employee morale.
o Link between compensation and responsibility – promotional opportunities are often linked
with a corresponding increase in compensation. In a decentralized organization, a
compensation increase often corresponds to a commensurate increase in the
responsibilities associated with learning new skills, increased decision-making authority, and
supervision of other employees.
o Better use of lower and middle management – many tasks must be performed in order to
achieve success in an organization. Decentralized organizations often rely on lower and
middle management to perform many of these tasks. This allows managers to gain valuable
experience and expertise in different areas.
Benefits of Decentralization
Supporters of decentralizing decision making claim the following benefits from granting responsibilities to
managers of subunits:
1. Creates greater responsiveness to the needs of a subunit’s customers, suppliers, and employees. Good
decisions cannot be made without good information. Compared with top managers, subunit managers are better
informed about their competitors, suppliers, and employees, as well as about local factors that affect performance,
such as ways to decrease costs, improve quality, and better respond to customers. Flextronics, a global supply
chain solutions company, uses decentralization to reduce bureaucracy and increase responsiveness. Managers can
use the company’s worldwide information technology to solve a local customer’s problem or send a project to
other managers without going through red tape.
2. Leads to gains from faster decision making by subunit managers. Decentralization speeds decision making,
creating a competitive advantage over centralized organizations. Centralization slows down decision making
because the decisions must be pushed upward through layer after layer of management before they are finalized.
Interlake Mecalux, a leading provider of materials-handling solutions and storage products, cites this benefit of
decentralization: “We have distributed decision- making powers more broadly to the cutting edge of product and
market opportunity.” Interlake’s storage system solutions must often be customized to fit the needs of
customers. Delegating decision making to the sales force allows Interlake to respond faster to changing customer
requirements.
3. Assists management development and learning. Subunit managers are more motivated and committed when
they can exercise initiative. Moreover, giving managers more responsibility helps a company develop an
experienced pool of talent to fill higher-level management positions and weed out people unlikely to be successful
top managers. According to Tektronix, an electronics company based in Oregon, “Decentralized units provide a
training ground for general managers and a visible field of combat where product champions can fight for their
ideas.”
4. Sharpens the focus of subunit managers and broadens the reach of top management. In a decentralized
setting, the manager of a subunit has a concentrated focus. The head of Yahoo Japan, for example, can develop
country-specific knowledge and expertise (about local advertising trends, cultural norms, payment forms, and so
on) and focus on maximizing Yahoo’s profits in Japan. At the same time, this relieves Yahoo’s senior managers at its
Sunnyvale, California, headquarters from the burden of controlling day-to-day operating decisions in Japan. They
can spend more time and effort on strategicplanning for the entire organization.
Costs of Decentralization
Advocates of more-centralized decision making believe decentralizing is costly because it does the following:
1. Leads to suboptimal decision making. If the subunit managers do not have the necessary expertise or talent to
make major decisions, the company, as a whole, is worse off because its top managers have relinquished their
responsibility for doing so. Even if subunit managers are sufficiently skilled, suboptimal decision making—also
called incongruent decision making or dysfunctional decision making—occurs when a decision’s benefit to one
subunit is more than offset by the costs to the organization as a whole. This is most prevalent when the subunits of
the company are highly interdependent, such as when the end product of one subunit is used or sold by another
subunit. For example, suppose Nintendo’s marketing group receives a rush order for additional Wii consoles in
Australia following the release of some popular new games. A manufacturing manager in Japan who is evaluated
on the basis of costs may be unwilling to arrange this rush order because altering production schedules invariably
increases manufacturing costs. From Nintendo’s viewpoint, however, supplying the consoles may be optimal, both
because the Australian customers are willing to pay a premium price and because the current shipment is expected
to stimulate future orders for other Nintendo games and consoles.
2. Leads to unhealthy competition. In a decentralized setting, subunit managers may regard themselves as
competing with managers of other subunits in the same company as if they were external rivals. This pushes them
to view the relative performance of the subunit as more important than the goals of the company. Consequently,
managers may be unwilling to assist other subunits (as in the Nintendo example) or share important information.
The 2010 Congressional hearings on the recall of Toyota vehicles revealed that it was common for Toyota’s Japan
unit to not share information about engineering problems or reported defects between its United States, Asian,
and European operations. Toyota has since asserted that it will change this dysfunctional behavior.
3. Results in duplication of output. If subunits provide similar products or services, their internal competition
could lead to failure in the external markets. The reason is that divisions may find it easier to steal market share
from one another, by mimicking each other’s successful products, rather than those of competing firms.
Eventually, this leads to confusion in the minds of customers and the loss of each division’s distinctive
strengths. A classic example is General Motors, which eventually dissolved its Oldsmobile, Pontiac, and Saturn
divisions. Similarly, Condé Nast Publishing’s initially distinct food magazines Bon Appétit and Gourmet eventually
ended up chasing the same readers and advertisers, to the detriment of both. Gourmet magazine stopped
publication in November 2009.2
4. Results in duplication of activities. Even if the subunits operate in distinct markets, several individual subunits of
the company may undertake the same activity separately. In a highly decentralized company, each subunit may
have personnel to carry out staff functions such as human resources or information technology. Centralizing these
functions helps to streamline and use fewer resources for these activities and eliminates wasteful duplication. For
example, ABB of Switzerland, a global leader in power and automation technology, is decentralized but has
generated significant cost savings of late by centralizing its sourcing decisions across business units for parts, such
as pipe pumps and fittings, as well as engineering and erection services. Having subunits share services such as
information technology and human resources is becoming popular with companies because it saves 30–40% of the
cost of having each subunit purchase these services on its own.
Responsibility Accounting
Refers to an accounting system that collects, summarizes, and reports accounting data relating to the
responsibilities of individual manager. A responsibility accounting system provides information to
evaluate each manager on the revenue and expense items over which that manager has primary
control (authority of influence).
Decentralized organizations use a responsibility accounting system to tie together lower-level
managers’ decisions with accountability for the outcome of those decisions. In a responsibility
accounting system, lower-level managers have decision-making authority, but they are also
accountable for the effect on business that their decisions have.
Responsibility accounting is a system that involves identifying responsibility centers and their
objectives, developing performance measurement schemes, and preparing and a analyzing
performance reports of the responsibility centers.
Responsibility Accounting is an underlying concept of accounting performance measurement
systems. The basic idea is that large diversified organizations are difficult, if not impossible to
manage as a single segment, thus they must be decentralized or separated into manageable parts.
These parts, or segments are referred to as responsibility centers.
Responsibility Centers
Recall (from Chapter 6) that a responsibility center is a segment or subunit of the organization whose manager is
accountable for a specified set of activities. To measure the performance of subunits in centralized or
decentralized companies, the management control system uses one or a mix of the four types of responsibility
centers:
1. Cost Center —the manager is accountable for costs only.
A cost center is a department or function within an organization that does not directly add
to profit but still costs the organization money to operate
Contributes to company’s profitability indirectly through
i. Operational efficiency
ii. Customer service
iii. Increasing product value
Managers of costs centers such as human resources and accounting departments are
responsible for keeping their costs in line or below budget and does not bear ay
responsibility regarding revenues or investment decisions.
Any associated benefits or revenue-producing activities of these department are
disregarded for internal management purposes.
Help management utilize resources in smarter ways by having a greater understanding of
how they are being used.
Include company’s
i. Accounting department
ii. Information technology
iii. Maintenance staff
iv. Quality control
v. Customer service center
How to measure
i. Cost per unit. Since a cost center manager is responsible for costs, cost per unit
produced or supplied is an obvious measure. A simple way to calculate this is to
divide the costs incurred in a period by the units produced in the period
ii. Efficiency, capacity utilization, and production volume ratios. These relate to the
use of time (and hence labor costs) in the center. When setting a budget for a cost
center, it is normal to specify how long it should take to produce each item
(standard hours per unit) and how many hours the factory to expected in work.
2. Revenue and Profit Center —the manager is accountable for revenues only. the manager is accountable
for revenues and costs.
A revenue center is a responsibility center where a manager would only be accountable for
the generation of revenues with no control over costs.
A profit center is a responsibility center where a manager is responsible for generating
revenues, while also planning and controlling costs and expenses.
A profit center is a branch or division of a company that directly adds to the corporation’s
bottom-line profitability.
A profit center is treated as a separate business, with revenues accounted for on a stand-
alone basis.
Profit centers are crucial to determining which units are the most and the least profitable
within an organization.
The managers or executives in charge of profit centers have decision -making authority
related to product pricing and operating expenses
Managers also face considerable pressure as they must ensure that their division’s sales
from products or services outweigh the costs – that their profit center produces profits year
after year, either by increasing revenue, decreasing expenses, or both.
Examples
i. Individual restaurants in a large restaurant chain
ii. Manufacturing divisions in a large retail chain
iii. Individual retail stores in a large retail chain
iv. Local branches in a regional or nationwide distribution business
v. Other organizational subunit deliberately established to maximize the profits of the
subunits
vi. Any other department or subunit where profitability can be measured by matching
revenues with costs
How to measure
i. Profit compared to budget. Profit centers will usually have budgets to work to so
this simple comparison is very useful.
ii. Profit per unit. Profit per unit produced or supplied, calculation is divide the profit
for a period by he units produced in the period.
iii. Gross profit percentage
iv. Net profit percentage
v. Expenses over sales. These can be useful ratios to see if expenses (Such as
administration expenses) are keeping in line with sales.
3. Investment Center—the manager is accountable for investments, revenues, and costs.
Is a business unit in a firm that can utilize capital to contribute directly to a company’s
profitability
Companies evaluate the performance of an investment center according to the revenues it
brings in through investments in capital assets compared to the overall expenses.
An investment center is a center that is responsible for its own revenues, expenses, and
assets, and manages its own financial statements which are typically a balance sheet and an
income statement. Because costs, revenue, and assets have to be identified separately, an
investment center would usually be a subsidiary company or a division.
Examples
i. Division of a large organization
ii. Branch offices of banks
iii. Subsidiary companies
iv. University campuses
v. Business units
One can classify an investment center as an extension of the profit center where revenues
and expenses are measured. However, only in an investment center are the assets employed
also measured and compared to the profit made.
How to measure
i. Return on investment. Earnings divided by investment
ii. Residual income. Earnings minus expected target return
iii. Economic value added. After tax earning minus cost of capital.
Each type of responsibility center can be found in either centralized or decentralized companies.
A common