Parkin 13ge Econ IM
Parkin 13ge Econ IM
C h a p t e r
PERFECT
COMPETITION
If there aren’t really any perfectly competitive markets, what use is studying perfect competition? The
perfect competition model serves as a benchmark and its predictions work in a wide range of real markets.
Set the scene for appreciating the power of the perfect competition model with a physical analogy. Explain
that physicists often use the model of a “perfect vacuum” to understand our physical world. For example, to
predict how long it will take a 50 pound steel ball to hit the ground if it is dropped from the top of the
Empire State Building, you will be very close to the actual time if you assume a perfect vacuum and use the
formula that applies in that case. Friction from the atmosphere is obviously not zero, but assuming it to be
zero is not very misleading. In contrast, if you want to predict how long it will take a feather to make the
same trip, you need a much fancier model! Economists use the model of perfect competition in a similar way
to understand our economic world. Emphasize to students that, although no real world industry meets the full
definition of perfect competition, the behavior of firms in many real world industries and the resulting
dynamics of their market prices and quantities can be predicted to a high degree of accuracy by using the
model of perfect competition.
Price Takers
Firms in perfect competition are price takers, meaning that a firm that cannot influence the market
price and so it sets its own price equal to the market price.
What is a price taker? Spend a few minutes providing intuition to ensure that your students understand why
firms in perfect competition are “price takers.” On the one hand, they could offer to sell for a lower price,
but they’d be giving profits away because they can sell all they want at the going market price. On the other
hand, they can ask for a higher price but not even one consumer will pay because consumers know where to
buy an exact substitute at a lower price.
132 CHAPTER 12
What’s the point? Students find the topic of competitive market dynamics challenging. Part of their problem
is that understanding the dynamics requires a strong understanding of the cost curves of the previous chapter,
yet many of them still have only a shaky grasp of that important material. So emphasize the cumulative
nature of economics and remind the students of the huge payoff from mastering material a bite at a time.
You also can help your students by emphasizing the two primary goals of this chapter: (1) To derive the
market supply curve in a competitive industry and (2) to deepen your students’ understanding of how
competition among self-interested consumers and producers will move society’s resources from less valued
uses to more highly valued uses, achieving an efficient allocation in the eyes of society.
The firm will continue operating in the short run even if it incurs an economic loss as long as the
price exceeds the minimum AVC.
Why would a restaurant open on days it knows business will be bad? Monday is typically the slowest day
in the restaurant industry. So why do so many restaurants stay open on Monday? The answer is that even if a
restaurant incurs an economic loss on Monday, it still might increase its total profit by remaining open. The
point is that as long as the restaurant can cover all its variable costs—the cost of the food, the cost of the
servers, and so on—it likely will be able to pay some of its fixed costs using the revenue left over after
paying its variable costs. As long as the restaurant can pay some of its fixed costs on Monday, its total profit
by staying open exceeds what its total profit would be if it closed. So losing money on Monday might be
good business!
Students often have a hard time understanding why operating at an economic loss can be the best action for a
firm owner. The key is emphasizing:
The firm’s short-run decisions are made after some irreversible commitments have generated sunk
costs.
The firm considers only avoidable future costs when making decisions. Unavoidable costs have no
impact on the decision (other than to learn from them).
For the firm to continue to produce output, the firm needs only to receive revenues that exceed any
avoidable costs, not necessarily all total costs.
Basically, the goal of profit maximization does not guarantee that the firm will earn a positive economic
profit in the short run. Sometimes the best the firm can do is to minimize its economic loss.
Short-run Equilibrium
Market demand and short-run market supply determine the market price and market output. Each
firm takes the market price as given, and produces its profit maximizing output.
A Change in Demand
Changes in market demand influence the output and the entry or exit decisions made by firms.
An increase in market demand shifts the market demand curve rightward and raises the market price.
Each firm responds by increasing its quantity supplied.
A decrease in market demand shifts the market demand curve leftward and decreases the market
price. Each firm responds by decreasing its quantity
supplied.
Profits and Losses in the Short Run
In the short run, even though firms attempt to
maximize profit, they may end up breaking even or
incurring an economic loss. The total economic profit
(or loss) is equal to (P − ATC) × q.
If the price exceeds the ATC, the firm makes an
economic profit (as illustrated in the figure).
If the price equals the ATC, the firm “breaks
even” by making zero economic profit. In this
case, the entrepreneur makes a normal profit.
If the price is less than the ATC, the firm incurs
an economic loss.
An Economics in Action application considers the situation of Harley Davidson after a decrease in the
market demand. Harley Davidson cut production and laid off workers. One plant was temporarily idled and
other jobs were lost permanently.
Exit
The effects of a decrease in market demand are the opposite of those outlined above.
In the long run, competitive firms make zero economic profit (price = average total cost) so that their
owners make a normal profit.
Why would a firm stay in business if profit is zero? It is likely that you will hear this question from at least
one of your students. Remind them that the profit we’re measuring is economic profit. Zero economic profit
doesn’t necessarily mean that the firm isn’t making any money. Rather, zero economic profit means that the
profits the accountant is reporting is exactly the same as the value of the firm’s best alternative. If the firm
were to move to its best alternative, it would make the same amount of profit. If a firm is making zero
economic profit, there isn’t any incentive to go anywhere else as there isn’t any place that would generate a
higher return for the firm. You may need to continue reminding your students of this throughout this chapter.
An Economics in Action feature examines entry and exit using the personal computer market and the farm
equipment market.
Change in Supply
New, cost-saving technologies typically require new plant and equipment. Consequently it takes time
for new technology to spread throughout an industry. Firms that adopt the new technology lower
their costs and their supply curves shift rightward. The price of the good falls but the firms with the
new technology make an economic profit.
Firms using the old technology incur economic losses. These firms either adopt the new technology
or else exit the industry. In the long run, all the firms use the new technology and make zero
economic profit.
Changes in technology brings only temporary economic profit to producers, but the lower prices and
better products that technological advances bring are permanent gains for consumers.
An Economics in the News case explores the implications of technological changes that have created falling
costs to sequence DNA.
Do firms in perfectly competitive markets advertise? Firms in perfectly competitive markets have no
incentive to advertise because their product is indistinguishable from the output of rival firms. Industry
associations will sometimes advertize to increase demand for the product as a whole. Brainstorming all the
ads for agricultural products such as “Pork: the other white meat,” and all the varieties of milk ads can be
fun, but the point is that it isn’t a pork producer or a dairy farmer creating the ad, but all of the pork
producers or dairy farmers paying dues to an industrial organization that then creates the ads. Successful
advertisements might lead to an economic profit in the short run, but in the long run entry will force the
firms back to zero economic profit.
greater net benefits to society. The figure shows this outcome, where resource use is efficient at the
equilibrium quantity of 3,000 units.
Watching the work of the invisible hand: The power of the market to make firms respond to consumers’
changing demands becomes visible to the student in this chapter. When you teach the dynamics of firm entry
and exit, do the analysis with a specific (and current) example with which the students can identify. Have
them pick an industry that has grown and largely died in their lifetime (for me, VCRs, for them, DVDs at
Blockbuster, or video cameras or film cameras). What has replaced it and how is society served by failure as
well as success?
Economics in the News analyzes Apple’s decision to offer free curriculum to high schools and colleges
interested in teaching app development to their students. It explains how the rapid expansion of smartphones
has increased the demand for apps while the recruitment of new app developers increases supply.
Additional Problems
increased by 1 plate an hour. The marginal cost of increasing output from 1 to 2 plates an hour is $6
($26 minus $20). The marginal cost of increasing output from 2 to 3 plates an hour is $9 ($35 minus
$26). So the marginal cost of the second plate is half-way between $6 and $9, which is $7.50.
Marginal cost equals marginal revenue when Lucy produces 2 plates an hour.
b. Lucy’s shutdown point is at a price of $10 a plate. The shutdown point is the price that equals
minimum average variable cost. To calculate total variable cost, subtract total fixed cost ($5, which
is total cost at zero output) from total cost. Average variable cost equals total variable cost divided
by the quantity produced. For example, the average variable cost of producing 3 plates is $10 a plate.
Average variable cost is a minimum when marginal cost equals average variable cost. The marginal
cost of producing 3 plates is $10. So the shutdown point is a price of $10 a plate.
c. Lucy will leave the industry if in the long run the price is less than $11 a plate. Lucy’s Lasagna will
leave the industry if it incurs an economic loss in the long run. To incur an economic loss, the price
will have to be below minimum average total cost. Average total cost equals total cost divided by the
quantity produced. For example, the average total cost of producing 2 plates is $13 a plate. Average
total cost is a minimum when it equals marginal cost. The average total cost of producing 3 plates is
$11.67, and the average total cost of producing 4 plates is $11.50. Marginal cost when Lucy's
produces 3 plates is $10 and marginal cost when Lucy's produces 4 plates is $12. At 3 plates,
marginal cost is less than average total cost; at 4 plates, marginal cost exceeds average total cost. So
minimum average total cost occurs between 3 and 4 plates—$11 at 3.5 plates an hour.
d. Firms with costs identical to Lucy’s will enter at any price above $11 a plate. Firms will enter an
industry when firms currently in the industry are making economic profit. Firms with costs identical
to Lucy's will make economic profit when the price exceeds minimum average total cost, which is
$11 a plate.
e. The price in the long run is $11 a plate. At $11 a plate, firms in the industry make zero economic
profit.
2. What is implied about efficiency if the average cost of producing a good exceeds the price
people are willing to pay for it? Remind the students that a firm’s cost curves reflect the
opportunity cost to society of the firm using the resources to make the goods in its market
(the resources could be making goods in some other market that could bring benefits to
society). The demand curve reflects the value society places on each quantity of goods
produced. If the price people are willing to pay is determined by the market supply and
demand and the going market price is less than the opportunity cost of producing the last unit
of the good, using more resources to increase output creates fewer net benefits for society
than could be generated if the resources were used elsewhere in other markets.
What happens to the resources that were used by a firm for production when that firm exits
the industry? Point out that when price falls below ATC, this generates an economic loss for
the firm. This is a signal from a society of consumers to the owner of the resources that he or
she will benefit from reallocating the resources to making different goods and services from
the same resources. Society also stands to benefit from this switch.
How can an increase in net benefits to society be generated from the systematic destruction
of firms leaving the market? A famous economist named Joseph Schumpeter coined the
phrase “creative destruction” to describe the dynamics of a competitive market. While the
productive capacity of a perfectly competitive industry facing declining consumer demand is
ultimately destroyed, the resources themselves are not destroyed. They are simply released to
firms in other markets to create goods and services that are relatively more valuable to
society. This “destruction” of an industry creates goods of greater social value in another
industry. That is Schumpeter’s “creative destruction.”
3. What makes all the self-interested firms adopt the latest available technology for producing
at the lowest opportunity cost possible over time? Emphasize that competitive firms cannot
increase their economic profits by raising their price, so they must search for ways to increase
economic profit through lowering production costs. This means that firms are constantly
seeking out the latest production technologies to find a cost advantage over their competitors.
If the other firms failed to adopt this low-cost production technology, they would suffer an
economic loss when those that do adopt the technology lower their prices to increase market
share. Firms that refuse to adopt the technology must then match a lower market price to
retain their market shares, causing them to bear an economic loss and face an eventual exit
from the market.
4. Discuss whether there are economies of scale or diseconomies of scale in class size at
colleges and universities. Does it matter if the “output” is measured in tuition dollars and
costs or in student success as measured by grades? Does technology impact the answer?
This situation can be fun to explore. Can a great teacher supported by excellent technology
be best used in a huge lecture class? Are there some types of instruction, like experimental
labs, where increasing class size might lead to disaster? Why do colleges advertise their
average class size and do parents and students care? How might the educational “plant” and
equipment differ to support various choices in class size?
5. Using the global corn market, consider the impact of increasing demand for ethanol made
from corn in the short and long run. The increase in demand for ethanol raises the price of
corn and thereby increases corn farmers’ economic profit…at least in the short run. But in the
long run, the economic profit leads existing farmers to plant more corn and more corn
farmers to enter the. These long-run changes increase the supply of corn, thereby lowering
the price of corn and decreasing corn farmers’ economic profit. Entry (and expansion)
continues until, in the long run, corn farmers’ economic profit equals zero. At that point entry
ceases and the corn market is back in long-run equilibrium.