Scribd
Upload
54 views4 pages

Mohd Amaan Sheikh - DFGE Module 4 Exercise Results Form

The document analyzes energy use and potential savings from various efficiency measures for a building. It evaluates: 1) Impact of daylight sensors at different depths from the building edge on energy savings 2) Impact of efficient lighting and controls on energy savings 3) Solar PV capacity needed to meet different percentages of annual demand and compares it to available roof area 4) Combining multiple efficiency measures including reduced window to wall ratio, external shading, ceiling fans, efficient lighting, and daylight sensors, which achieves 34.14% energy savings.

Uploaded by

Mohd Amaan Sheikh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
54 views4 pages

Mohd Amaan Sheikh - DFGE Module 4 Exercise Results Form

The document analyzes energy use and potential savings from various efficiency measures for a building. It evaluates: 1) Impact of daylight sensors at different depths from the building edge on energy savings 2) Impact of efficient lighting and controls on energy savings 3) Solar PV capacity needed to meet different percentages of annual demand and compares it to available roof area 4) Combining multiple efficiency measures including reduced window to wall ratio, external shading, ceiling fans, efficient lighting, and daylight sensors, which achieves 34.14% energy savings.

Uploaded by

Mohd Amaan Sheikh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Your Name: Mohd Amaan Sheikh

Final Energy Use Energy Saving%


M4.1 Daylight and Shape (Improved Case) KWh/Month (Improved Case vs BASE Case)

a Daylight sensor- North 30m depth 72280.53 KWh/M 4.06%


b Daylight sensor- North 20m depth 72682.45 KWh/M 5.53%
c Daylight sensor- North 10m depth 78328.99 KWh/M 9.51%

Final Energy Use Energy Saving%


M4.2 Efficient Lighting & Controls (Improved Case) KWh/Month (Improved Case vs BASE Case)

a Energy Saving lights- Internal spaces 76476.58 KWh/M 11.65%


Energy Saving lights- External
b spaces 85960.76 KWh/M 0.69%
Ocupancy Sensor in Bathrooms,
Conference + Occupancy sensor in
c Open Offices 86550.21 KWh/M 0.01%

Roof area in m2
required for PV Total roof area for this
M4.3 Solar PV (assuming 10m2/ kWp) building (m2)
Solar PV for 10% of annual demand
a and no other measure 93.9 939
Solar PV for 20% of annual demand
b and no other measure 187.8 1878
Solar PV for 100% of annual
c demand and no other measure 938.9 9389

Area of Solar PV Panel Solar PV Capacity


(m2) (Peak KW)
Solar PV capacity if ALL roof area
used for PV panels + no other 938.9 9389
d measure (Assume 10m2/kWp)

Roof area in m2
required for PV Total roof area for this
(assuming 10m2/ kWp) building (m2)

Solar PV for 20% of annual demand


e
+ Reduced WWR of 30%
+ External shading AASF 0.58
120.1 1201
+ Ceiling fans for Office spaces
+ Airconditioning with Water cooled
Final Energy Use Energy Saving%
chiller (Improved Case) KWh/Month (Improved Case vs BASE Case)
+ Energy Saving Lights- internal
spaces
+ Daylight Photoelectric Sensors for
inernal spaces
+ Reduced WWR of 30%
e + External shading AASF 0.58
+ Ceiling fans for Office spaces
+ Airconditioning with Water cooled
chiller
+ Energy Saving Lights- internal
spaces
+ Daylight Photoelectric Sensors for
inernal spaces 44812.17 34.14%

Area of Solar PV Panel Solar PV Capacity


(m2) (Peak KW)
Solar PV capacity if ALL roof area
used for PV panels + all measures 3697 369.7
f listed in (e) above

Any observations from the above


exercise
Any observations?

Any observations?

PV Area required vs available roof area

10%
10.00%
10.00%

Energy Saving%
(Improved Case vs BASE
Incremental Cost Case) Payback (years)

56,312,325.06 98.58% 6.3

PV Area required vs available roof area

10.00%

Any observations?
Energy Saving%
(Improved Case vs BASE
Incremental Cost Case) Payback (years)

24,718,394.06 79.53 5.61

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy