Educational Evaluation Guide

For Autism

Spring 2009

Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction

Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent
 THESE MATERIALS DEVELOPED BY:
Pam Foegen, Former Autism Consultant
Marge Resan, Former Autism Consultant
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Special thanks and appreciation to the following individuals whose contribution of expertise and time in July, 2008
made this document possible:
Kelly Brodhagen, Parent and Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative Program Assistant, CESA #6
Lisa Dillhunt, Autism Program Support Teacher, Green Bay Area Public Schools
Cynthia Kieck, Pre K-5 Pupil Service Team Leader, School District of South Milwaukee
Laurie Miller, Autism Program Support Teacher, Fond du Lac School District
Susan Stokes, Autism Consultant, CESA #6
Jude Teicher, Autism Consultant, CESA #2
Susan Volz Nett, Autism Program Support Teacher, Madison Metropolitan School District

Additionally, special thanks to the following individuals who contributed to the initial draft of these materials:
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction:
Sandy Berndt, Cognitive Disabilities Consultant
Pat Bober, Occupational Therapy Consultant
Lynn Boreson, Emotional Behavioral Disabilities Consultant
Sheryl Thormann, Speech/Language Consultant

Elizabeth Keenan, Former Director of Special Education, North Fond du Lac (WI) Schools
Lisa Schreiner, Teacher, La Crosse (WI) Schools
Michelle Sturz, Parent, Evansville, WI

Thanks to those who provided feedback on the Fall 2007 draft of these materials:
Autism Society of Wisconsin, Education Committee
Carol Zarske, Executive Director of Special Education, CESA 6
Gary D. Cumley, Associate Dean, School of Communicative Disorders, UW-Stevens Point
Julie LaBerge, Parent and Director of Special Education, Bonduel School District

Laura Comer CESA 12 Julie Ellis Racine

Mary Enright CESA 1 Colleen Fredelake Milwaukee
Amy Hamin Wisconsin Rapids Joan Helbing Appleton
Janet Hoelker Middleton-Cross Plains Tracy Hougum D. C. Everest
Karen Idso Eau Claire Carolyn Jahns DePere
Amanda Jansen CESA 7 Barb Kilp Milwaukee
April Knudson DePere Pat Konopka Oshkosh
Tammy Lampereur Ashwaubenon Lisa Lesselyong Kimberly
Veronica Milling Elkhorn Judi O’Brien Appleton
Judy Olm Fond du Lac Melissa Piette Wausau
Mary Smith Manitowoc Mikki Valona Antigo
Marcy Worzala Madison

2
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction 4

Wisconsin Eligibility Criteria for Autism 7

Analysis of the criteria 8

• PI-11.36 (8) (a): Definition; Autism and EBD 8

• PI-11.36 (8) (b): Evaluation procedures 9

Tests and Checklists
Observations
Interviews

• PI-11.36 (8) (b) 1: Social Participation 13

• PI-11.36 (8) (b) 2: Communication 15

• PI-11.36 (8) (b) 3: Developmental Rates & Sequences 17

• PI-11.36 (8) (b) 4: Cognition 18

• PI-11.36 (8) (b) 5: Sensory Processing 19

• PI-11.36 (8) (b) 6: Behavioral Repertoire 21

Need for Special Education 22

Appendices 25

A. Evaluation Instruments - Examples 26

B. Eligibility Worksheet 31

C. Need for Special Education Worksheet 32

D. Bibliography and Resources 33

3
 Introduction

Autism spectrum disorders are:

• Developmental disabilities.
• Usually evident before age three.
• Neurological disorders.

Autism is considered a spectrum disorder, meaning physical differences in the brains of individuals
with autism create
• Vastly differing neurological experiences;
• A wide continuum of symptoms;
• A range in severity;
• Wide variability among students.

Autism spectrum disorders occur across all socioeconomic, ethnic, cultural and geographic groups.
The incidence of autism spectrum disorders is higher among males than females.

The purpose of this guide is to provide information needed and processes to follow to determine
whether a student meets the eligibility criteria for the educational impairment area of autism under
the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

Medical Diagnosis versus Educational Eligibility Determination

Federal and state special education law use the categorical term autism, which in special education
practice may include students with medical diagnoses of autism spectrum disorders such as:
• Autism,
• Pervasive Developmental Disorder – Not Otherwise Specified (PDD-NOS),
• Asperger’s Syndrome.

NOTE: A medical diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder is not required in order to determine
whether a student meets eligibility criteria for the educational impairment area of autism. If
medical information is available it should be considered as part of the Individual Evaluation
Program (IEP) team’s evaluation but must not be the sole component. School personnel may not
require parents to obtain a medical diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder before proceeding with
an educational evaluation.

IEP teams make educational eligibility determinations, not medical diagnoses.

Educational Eligibility Determination

IEP teams conduct evaluations of students to determine eligibility for special education. The IEP
team must determine whether the student meets the educational impairment criteria and, as a result,
needs special education services.

NOTE: A medical diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder does not result in automatic eligibility
for special education under the impairment area of autism. It is also possible for a student to have
the educational impairment of autism but not need special education services.

4
When IEP teams evaluate students they must follow the required procedures and apply Wisconsin
eligibility criteria found in Chapter PI 11 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code. All IEP team
participants, including parents, are members of the team and must have an opportunity to
meaningfully participate in the decision making process.
Each IEP team must consist of the following:
• The parents of the child.
• At least one regular education teacher of the child if the child is, or may be, participating in
a regular educational environment.
• At least one special education teacher who has recent training or experience related to the
child’s known or suspected area of special education needs (in this case, autism) or, where
appropriate, at least one special education provider of the child.
• A representative of the local educational agency (LEA) who is qualified to provide, or
supervise the provision of, special education, is knowledgeable about the general curriculum
and is knowledgeable about and authorized to commit the available resources of the LEA.
• An individual who can interpret the instructional implications of evaluation results.
• At the discretion of the parent or the LEA, other individuals who have knowledge or special
expertise about the child, including related services personnel as appropriate.
• Whenever appropriate, the child.
• If a child is attending school through open enrollment or a tuition waiver, at least one person
designated by the resident district who has knowledge or special expertise about the child.
• When a child is suspected or known to need occupational therapy, physical therapy, or
speech and language therapy, a therapist in each respective area of service.

The LEA representative role may be fulfilled by another member of the IEP team provided the
individual meets the requirements to act in that capacity. The LEA should clearly identify on IEP
forms which role(s) each IEP team member is fulfilling.
The determination of whether an individual invited to the IEP team meeting by the parent or by the
LEA has knowledge or special expertise about the child is made by the party inviting the individual.
In addition to the legally required IEP team members, other school professionals are
recommended participants on IEP teams conducting educational autism evaluations. For
example:
• Occupational therapists assess the effects of the environment and the demands of an
activity on the student's ability to perform functional skills, such as the effects of noise or
touch on social interaction.
• Physical therapists assess the student’s motor skills.
• School nurses bring expertise to evaluation of complex health needs.
• School psychologists provide important information about the student’s social functioning,
neurological functioning, developmental rates and sequences, etc. and are able to interpret
the instructional implications of evaluation results.
• School social workers provide insight into the student’s developmental history and how
the student functions and interacts in home, school and community environments.
• Speech and language therapists conduct assessments of the student’s communication
abilities and needs.

5
NOTE: Given the need to evaluate the student's social, communicative and sensory functioning it is
strongly recommended a school psychologist, occupational therapist (OT) and a speech/language
pathologist (SLP) be included as IEP team participants.

The IEP team evaluation process begins when the LEA initiates or receives a written referral or
initiates a reevaluation. Existing data is then reviewed by the IEP team members to determine if
additional tests or other assessment information is needed. If additional assessment information is
needed, the LEA obtains parental consent and proceeds with evaluation. Once evaluation is
completed (or if no additional assessment information is necessary), the IEP team meets to
determine whether the student meets the educational eligibility criteria. If the student meets the
eligibility criteria, the IEP team determines whether the student also demonstrates a need for special
education. In order for the student to be a student with a disability, the student must have an
impairment(s) and a need for special education.

All LEAs have an obligation to locate, identify, and evaluate all children with disabilities, including
children with disabilities attending private schools in the school district, regardless of the severity of
their disabilities. LEAs conduct Child Find activities to locate and screen all children with suspected
disabilities who have not graduated from high school.

Further information on the IEP team process, including DPI sample forms, can be found at
http://dpi.wi.gov/sped/tm-specedtopics.html or by contacting the DPI Special Education Team at
(608) 266-1781.

6
 Wisconsin Eligibility Criteria for Autism: PI-11.36 (8)

AUTISM. (a) Autism means a developmental disability significantly affecting a child’s social interaction and
verbal and non-verbal communication, generally evident before age 3, that adversely affects learning and
educational performance. Other characteristics often associated with autism are engagement in repetitive
activities and stereotyped movements, resistance to environmental change or change in daily routines, and
unusual responses to sensory experiences. The term does not apply if a child’s educational performance is
adversely affected primarily because the child has an emotional disturbance, as defined in sub.(7).

(b) The results of standardized or norm–referenced instruments used to evaluate and identify a child under
this paragraph may not be reliable or valid. Therefore, alternative means of evaluation, such as criterion–
referenced assessments, achievement assessments, observation, and work samples, shall be considered to
identify a child under this paragraph. Augmentative communication strategies, such as facilitated
communication, picture boards, or signing shall be considered when evaluating a child under this
paragraph. To identify a child under this paragraph, the criteria under subd. 1. and 2. and one or more
criteria under subd. 3. through 6. shall be met.

1. The child displays difficulties or differences or both in interacting with people and events. The child may
be unable to establish and maintain reciprocal relationships with people. The child may seek consistency in
environmental events to the point of exhibiting rigidity in routines.

2. The child displays problems which extend beyond speech and language to other aspects of social
communication, both receptively and expressively. The child’s verbal language may be absent or, if present,
lacks the usual communicative form which may involve deviance or delay or both. The child may have a
speech or language disorder or both in addition to communication difficulties associated with autism.

3. The child exhibits delays, arrests, or regressions in motor, sensory, social or learning skills. The child may
exhibit precocious or advanced skill development, while other skills may develop at normal or extremely
depressed rates. The child may not follow normal developmental patterns in the acquisition of skills.

4. The child exhibits abnormalities in the thinking process and in generalizing. The child exhibits strengths in
concrete thinking while difficulties are demonstrated in abstract thinking, awareness and judgment.
Perseverant thinking and impaired ability to process symbolic information may be present.

5. The child exhibits unusual, inconsistent, repetitive or unconventional responses to sounds, sights, smells,
tastes, touch or movement. The child may have a visual or hearing impairment or both in addition to sensory
processing difficulties associated with autism.

6. The child displays marked distress over changes, insistence on following routines, and a persistent
preoccupation with or attachment to objects. The child’s capacity to use objects in an age–appropriate or
functional manner may be absent, arrested or delayed. The child may have difficulty displaying a range of
interests or imaginative activities or both. The child may exhibit stereotyped body movements.

7
 Analysis of the Criteria

PI 11.36 (8) (a): DEFINITION

(a) Autism means a developmental disability significantly affecting a child’s social interaction and
verbal and non-verbal communication, generally evident before age 3, that adversely affects
learning and educational performance. Other characteristics often associated with autism are
engagement in repetitive activities and stereotyped movements, resistance to environmental change
or change in daily routines, and unusual responses to sensory experiences. The term does not apply
if a child’s educational performance is adversely affected primarily because the child has an
emotional disturbance, as defined in sub.(7)

NOTE: In order to identify a student as meeting the educational eligibility criteria for autism, the
IEP team must find the impairment adversely affects the student’s learning and educational
performance. Educational performance may include:
• Cognitive performance, including academic and pre-academic skills.
• Communication skills.
• Personal/Social skills.
• Sensory processing and motor planning skills.
• Adaptive skills, including self-help skills and activities of daily living.

Impact on educational performance may extend beyond the school environment and the school day.
While the student with autism may appear to function in an expected way at school, the student may
experience significant challenges later due to the effort required to manage the communication,
social, academic and sensory expectations of a typical school day. For example, the student may
not be able to complete homework which will ultimately impact academic performance.

Autism and Emotional Behavioral Disability

Paragraph (a) of the criteria includes the following: The term does not apply if a child’s educational
performance is adversely affected primarily because the child has an emotional disturbance.

Students may be identified as meeting educational eligibility criteria in more than one impairment
area. However, if the issues most significantly impacting educational performance for a particular
student relate to an emotional behavioral disability (EBD), the student can not meet the criteria for
the educational impairment of autism. If the issues most significantly impacting educational
performance for a student relate to autism it is possible for that student to also meet the educational
eligibility criteria for EBD. An evaluation guide for EBD is available at
http://dpi.wi.gov/sped/pdf/ebdguide.pdf.

NOTE: IEP teams should examine all sources of information and use professional judgment in
considering the educational needs of the student and decide which area(s) of impairment best match
the student’s needs.

When a student meets educational eligibility criteria for an impairment in any area, and as a result
needs special education services, the IEP team must develop an IEP designed to provide a free,
appropriate public education (FAPE), addressing the student’s individual needs. The IEP team must
not predetermine the student’s programming or placement based on the student’s identified area(s)
of impairment. The individual student’s goals and objectives contained in the IEP are the basis for
determining the student’s programming and placement.
8
PI 11.36 (8) (b): EVALUATION PROCEDURES
(b) The results of standardized or norm–referenced instruments used to evaluate and identify a
child under this paragraph may not be reliable or valid. Therefore, alternative means of evaluation,
such as criterion–referenced assessments, achievement assessments, observation, and work
samples, shall be considered to identify a child under this paragraph. Augmentative communication
strategies, such as facilitated communication, picture boards, or signing shall be considered when
evaluating a child under this paragraph. To identify a child under this paragraph, the criteria under
subd. 1. and 2. and one or more criteria under subd. 3. through 6. shall be met.

No single assessment method is sufficient when determining eligibility for the educational
impairment of autism. IEP teams must apply evaluation information gathered from multiple sources
using a variety of methods to each of the components of the impairment criteria in order to
determine eligibility. Some commercial assessment tools provide global scores used in making
clinical diagnoses of autism; however, these measures are not based on the Wisconsin eligibility
criteria and are not sufficient to make an educational eligibility determination without additional
information. Many assessment tools contain subtests which may be useful in assessing components
of the criteria.

NOTE: IEP teams must gather information from multiple sources using a variety of methods,
including:
• Observations in a range of environments,
• Standardized or norm-referenced tests,
• Intellectual testing,
• Informal and criterion-referenced tests,
• Rating scales and checklists,
• Structured interviews with parents, caregivers, regular education teachers, and others as
appropriate,
• Developmental histories,
• For early childhood students, the IEP team must observe the student in the natural learning
environment with same-age peers.

Not all techniques must be used in all cases, but IEP teams should carefully consider what
information is needed and select appropriate methods.

Standardized Tests, Assessments and Checklists

Students with autism often exhibit characteristics that make assessment challenging. Students may
demonstrate communication deficits, sensory processing challenges, difficulty relating to unknown
people and situations, problems with attention and perception, lack of motivation, or unconventional
behavior. Evaluators may need to be flexible in administration of standardized testing. While this
may negate the validity of the test results, useful information about the student’s response to stress
and frustration, interpersonal relationships, and communication may be obtained. Special
consideration should be given to the testing environment due to potential sensory processing issues.
Be aware of factors that may impact the student’s ability to attend to the testing, and remove
potentially distracting materials before the student arrives. Testing sessions of shorter duration may
be most successful. Evaluators should be willing to end the session rather than allow the student to
experience unnecessary stress or frustration.

9
In selecting evaluation materials, the following questions may be useful:

Standardized or norm-referenced materials

• What information will the instrument give and is that information necessary and useful?
• Does the information relate to the Wisconsin impairment eligibility criteria?
• Will the information provided present an accurate picture of the student?
• Is the test appropriate for the student’s chronological and developmental levels?
• What are the language requirements of the test? Do they match the ability level, learning
style and/or communication modality of the student?
• What are the physical requirements of the test (length of administration, fine motor skills,
etc)? How does that compare to the abilities of the student?
• Is the format consistent throughout the test? Does the format of the test match the student’s
abilities? For example, if the student is not able to respond by pointing, do not choose a test
that requires a pointing response. Can the format be taught or practiced prior to
administration without compromising the results?
• Is the test culturally relevant and appropriate given the student’s experience? Will the
assessment be administered so as not to be biased on a racial or cultural basis?

Checklists or rating scales

• Does the checklist focus on necessary information?
• Does the checklist use family/student friendly language?
• Does the checklist look at the whole student or does it focus primarily on a limited area?
• How reliable and current is the checklist? Does it relate to the Wisconsin impairment
eligibility criteria?
• Are there subscales (e.g., teacher, parent, student)? Are results based on the input of more
than one person?
• Is the checklist a “yes-no” format or is it a Likert scale (e.g., multiple responses such as “0”
to “5” or “Never” to “Always”)? If it is a Likert scale, are there an even or odd number of
responses? (Note: an even number is preferable so the responder(s) do not have the option
of choosing the middle response.)

Some commonly used instruments by school personnel are listed in Appendix A on page 26.
Since new products are always being developed and existing materials updated and re-normed, it is
best to check with the publishing companies to make sure you are considering the latest edition.

NOTE: IEP teams must exercise caution in interpreting scores from standardized assessments,
checklists, and rating scales. These measures are not based on the Wisconsin eligibility criteria. IEP
teams must not make decisions about eligibility based solely on these scores.

Observations
Observing the student in a variety of natural learning environments is critical for understanding the
student. Examples of natural learning environments may include:
• Classrooms,
• Hallways,
• The cafeteria,
• Special classes such as computer lab, library, art, music, and physical education,
• Assemblies/field trips,
10
 • The playground,
• The bus,
• The student’s home/community.
• For early childhood students, natural learning environments may include the student’s home
or child care setting.

The data collected during systematic observations for the purpose of evaluation can be used as a
baseline and/or present level of performance for an IEP.

NOTE: Direct observation of the student in a variety of contexts and across time is a critical
component of the evaluation.

Observing the student provides information about the effect of different environments on the
student’s ability to perform required skills. The information gathered across settings is also helpful
in comparing the skills of the student being evaluated to those of other students.

More information on collecting observational data including suggested tools and formats can be
found in the document “Collecting Observational Data” at
http://dpi.wi.gov/sped/doc/ebdobserve.doc.

Interviews
Interview questions should be tailored to the individual or situation, and focus on information
related to the Wisconsin impairment eligibility criteria. The length of interviews may vary to allow
time to explore unexpected issues that may arise. Interviews present an opportunity to establish
rapport and are more personal than questionnaires.

When interviewing parents, staff, and other adults, ask about the student’s:
• Medical history, including current health issues and medications.
• Developmental history, including
• Developmental rates and sequences;
• Verbal and non-verbal communication including pre-speech and receptive language;
• Student’s social interaction with both peers and adults;
• Play patterns and skills;
• Areas of interest or expertise;
• Adaptive skills (self-help skills and activities of daily living);
• Existence of established routines;
• Movement and motor skills including repetitive movements/behaviors;
• Student’s ability to handle change and transitions;
• Idiosyncratic or unusual behavior;
• Response to various types of sensory input;
• Cognitive and learning style, including strength’s, processing time, attention to tasks,
concrete/abstract thinking and learning new tasks or skills.
• Educational progress, including adjustment to school, grades, attendance, favorite subjects
or activities, relationships with peers, problems and concerns, strengths and abilities.
• Community involvement, concerns, issues.

11
Evaluators should interview the student being evaluated directly whenever possible. The student can
provide firsthand information about peer relationships, attitudes toward school, hobbies and
interests, strengths and challenges, sensory concerns, and activities outside of school.

A list of possible questions to ask can be found in Appendix B on page 31. More information on
interviews can be found in the document “Using Interviews to Collect Behavioral Data” at
http://dpi.wi.gov/sped/doc/ebdintview.doc.

Record Review
Review educational records, any available relevant medical records, and available information from
outside evaluations. Many students with autism participate in intensive early intervention programs
such as those funded by the Autism Medicaid Children’s Waiver. The providers of these
intervention programs keep detailed progress records that provide a wealth of information.

12
PI 11.36 (8) (b) 1: SOCIAL PARTICIPATION
1. The child displays difficulties or differences or both in interacting with people and events. The
child may be unable to establish and maintain reciprocal relationships with people. The child may
seek consistency in environmental events to the point of exhibiting rigidity in routines.

Explanation
Students with autism exhibit differences in the development of social relation skills that most
typical children develop innately. While students with autism may show interest in social
interaction and /or affection, they may not be able to initiate or maintain interactions with peers and
adults in the expected manner for their age. Some students with autism may successfully learn the
rote aspects of interaction including manners, social niceties and eye gaze. Exercise caution in
interpreting these rule-based social skills as being an overall indicator of the quality of the student’s
social abilities.

Social expectations change as students grow and develop. For very young children, most social
contact occurs within the family and community. As students get older, their social interactions
include those outside of the family context. Friendships with peers become increasingly important.
Students with autism often have difficulty developing and maintaining appropriate social
relationships. Many students with autism prefer the company of, or have better social success with,
adults or younger children versus same-age peers. Be cautious in interpreting students’ social
abilities based only on successful interactions with adults, especially in structured situations.

Assessment Considerations
Observations
When evaluating social interactions it is best to observe the student in various social
situations. Look for evidence of the following:
• Attachment – Does the student form attachments to family members and others?
• Joint attention – Is the student able to share attention with another person to a third
object or event? For example, does the student point to share his/her interest in an
experience, i.e. “Look, there’s an airplane! How cool!” Some students with autism
may take another person’s hand or point solely to get their wants and needs met, but
this is not considered sharing or joint attention.
• Social orientation/social awareness – How aware is the student to the social
environment as compared to the physical environment? Is the student drawn to
people versus the physical aspects of an environment?
• Imitation – Does the student learn from imitating what he or she sees others doing?
For example, when the teacher gives group directions, does the student attend to his
peers and imitate their actions?
• Social reciprocity/turn-taking – Does the student engage in give-and-take, back-and-
forth social interaction including conversation, turn-taking in games, waiting their
turn in group situations such as during group classroom discussions?
• Social rules/codes of conduct – Does the student understand the unstated, tacit rules
of social interactions and social situations? For example, does the student understand
the social rules around how to show interest in a person she or he likes?
• Social play – What is the social quality of the student’s play? Does the student
prefer to play alone? Does the student engage in parallel play? Does the student
play interactively and appropriately, or does the student dominate play with peers?
How does the student handle competition?
13
 • Group social skills – How does the student interact in group learning activities?
Does the student recognize and understand his/her role in a group, such as taking
turns, waiting, following group directions, etc.?
• Social cognition – Does the student understand that others have thoughts, ideas,
opinions and interests that are different from his/her own? Does the student
understand that his or her behavior has an impact on others?

Interviews
Interviewing the student and those who know the student well will provide insight into the
student’s social abilities. Ask questions about the aspects of social interaction that were not
evident during observations. Inquire about aspects of your observations to corroborate the
information obtained.

Record Review
Look at report cards for teacher comments about the student’s social interactions. Notes
between parents and teachers, behavioral records such as disciplinary referrals, and
preschool records, etc. may be sources for social interaction information.

14
PI 11.36 (8) (b) 2: COMMUNICATION:
2. The child displays problems which extend beyond speech and language to other aspects of social
communication, both receptively and expressively. The child’s verbal language may be absent or, if
present, lacks the usual communicative form which may involve deviance or delay or both. The
child may have a speech or language disorder or both in addition to communication difficulties
associated with autism.

Explanation
Students with autism exhibit a wide range of language and communication abilities, ranging from
pre-speech or nonverbal to highly verbal with excellent vocabularies. Though some students with
autism exhibit appropriate language form skills (vocabulary, speech sound skills, grammatical
skills, sentence length and structure) all students with autism exhibit communication difficulties or
differences in language use. Both receptive and expressive communication skills should be
evaluated.

Speech and language pathologists have specialized skills and can evaluate speech and language
skills and provide services to improve language and communication. A child who meets the
educational eligibility criteria for autism may or may not also meet the educational eligibility
criteria for speech and language impairment. An IEP team for a child who meets the criteria for
autism but does not meet the educational eligibility criteria for speech and language impairment
may decide the child requires speech and language as a related service in order for the child to
benefit from special education. The IEP team has several options to consider in determining how
the student’s language and communication needs will be met. For example, language and
communication needs may be met by direct service from a speech and language pathologist or by
others, including the regular education teacher or other special education providers. More
information on assessment of speech and language impairments may be found at
http://dpi.wi.gov/sped/pdf/slguide.pdf.

NOTE: Strong verbal skills often mask underlying deficits in comprehension of verbal and
nonverbal language. Many students with autism, even those with highly sophisticated verbal skills,
appear to understand and know more than they are able to actually process or perform.

Assessment Considerations
Observations
Pre-/Nonverbal Students – Observe the student. Does the student:
• Understand cause and effect?
• Exhibit communicative intent (the desire to communicate with another person)?
• Have a form of communication? For example, vocalizations, gestures, signing,
pictures, Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS), etc.
• Get his or her wants and needs met? How? For example, does the student gesture or
take the hand of an adult to direct the adult to a wanted item? Does the student use
eye gaze to indicate wants? Does the student communicate through crying, tantrums,
refusal, or other communicative behaviors?
• Repeat or echo words or phrases (echolalia)?
• Demonstrate spontaneous use of core communicative functions such as requesting,
protesting or refusal, indicating cessation (“all done”), requesting help or assistance?
• Spontaneously seek out others to initiate communication without prompting?
• Understand and follow verbal and nonverbal directions?
15
 • Exhibit auditory processing delays?

Verbal Students – Observe the student. Does the student:

• Spontaneously seek out others to initiate communication without prompting?
• Demonstrate spontaneous use of core communicative functions such as requesting,
protesting or refusal, indicating cessation (“all done”), requesting help or assistance?
• Have reciprocal conversations?
• Maintain a topic initiated by others?
• Attend to communicative partner, for example, call out the person’s name, establish
eye contact, or demonstrate appropriate personal space?
• Observe and understand nonverbal cues exhibited by others?
• Exhibit appropriate nonverbal cues themselves, such as body language, tone of
voice, vocal inflection, eye gaze, personal space, etc.?
• Show an interest/awareness in the needs and wishes of others? Can the student
communicate that interest/awareness such as by asking questions about the other
person’s interests?
• Show awareness and ability to repair communication breakdowns?
• Exhibit a knowledge base of his or her communicative partner? Does the student
provide sufficient background or reference information to help the partner understand
and participate in the conversation?
• Have the vocabulary and knowledge base to express his/her emotions/feelings in a
variety of situations?
• Understand and follow verbal and nonverbal directions?
• Understand and use figurative language such as idioms or slang?
• Exhibit auditory processing delays?
• Answer questions?
• Participate appropriately in small or large group discussion?

Interviews
Interviewing the student and those who know the student well will provide insight into the
student’s communication abilities. Ask questions about the aspects of communication that
were not evident during observations. Inquire about aspects of your observations to
corroborate the information obtained. Seek information from parents and others about the
student’s early communication/language development, i.e. delays, differences, regressions.

Record Review
Look at report cards for teacher comments about the student’s communication. Notes
between parents and teachers, behavioral records such as disciplinary referrals, and
preschool records, etc. may be sources for communication/language information.

16
PI 11.36 (8) (b) 3: DEVELOPMENTAL RATES AND SEQUENCES
3. The child exhibits delays, arrests, or regressions in motor, sensory, social or learning skills. The
child may exhibit precocious or advanced skill development, while other skills may develop at
normal or extremely depressed rates. The child may not follow normal developmental patterns in
the acquisition of skills.

Explanation
Children generally develop in similar stages and sequences. Diverse patterns of behavior and
learning emerge as a result of the interaction of several factors including: genetic predisposition and
physical characteristics; socio-economic status; and values, beliefs, cultural and political practices
of their families and communities. For information about typical developmental rates and
sequences, see Wisconsin’s Model Early Learning Standards, available at
http://www.collaboratingpartners.com/EarlyLS.htm.

The developmental rates and sequences of students with autism typically include a splintering of
skills with clear strengths and weaknesses. In addition, students with autism often exhibit advanced
or precocious development in certain concrete visual rote learning skills while exhibiting depressed
rates in other areas. These students do not always follow a normal developmental pattern or
progression in acquiring skills.

NOTE: Information in this area is often gathered through thorough developmental history
interviews and record review.

Assessment Considerations
Standardized Tests, Assessments and Checklists
If standardized tests are given, look for discrepancies among subtest scores or scores
between different tests, including standardized testing measuring motor, sensory, social or
learning skills.

Observations
Observations are especially important for assessing development of early childhood
students.

Interviews
Parents, teachers, early caregivers, outside therapists and other service providers can be
sources of information about uneven developmental rates and sequences.

Record Review
Thoroughly review school records, available medical or outside service provider records for
information about uneven developmental rates and sequences.

17
PI 11.36 (8) (b) 4: COGNITION:
4. The child exhibits abnormalities in the thinking process and in generalizing. The child exhibits
strengths in concrete thinking while difficulties are demonstrated in abstract thinking, awareness
and judgment. Perseverant thinking and impaired ability to process symbolic information may be
present.

Explanation
Students with autism often process information in a concrete and literal manner with difficulties
understanding abstract and symbolic information or relationships. Executive functioning skills, i.e.
attending, problem solving, organizing, prioritizing, and/or generalizing are often compromised.

NOTE: Older students with autism may have academic performance difficulties despite high
intellectual ability due to struggles with critical thinking skills (for example difficulty comparing
and contrasting, discerning main ideas, sequencing, organizing, etc.).

Assessment Considerations
Standardized Tests, Assessments and Checklists
If standardized tests are given, look for evidence of processing strengths and difficulties.
School Psychologists are able to analyze information about cognitive processing.

Observations
When assessing a student’s cognitive processing, observe the student’s ability to:
• Understand abstract language concepts such as words with multiple meanings, idioms,
etc.
• Understand hidden meanings of language, commands, directions, teasing, jokes, etc.
• Generate imaginative play versus rote play.
• Problem solve and make inferences,
• Make realistic, practical predictions about situations and events.
• Understand the concept of the passage of time and time management.
• Organize herself or himself and materials, and get started on an action or activity.
• Generalize concepts (be aware of both over-generalization and under-generalization)
across people, settings, materials, etc.
• Understand the difference between reality and pretend.
• Discriminate important information and prioritize attention to salient information.
• Use written expression at the expected level for the student’s intellectual ability. Written
expression is a complex task, and difficulties may arise from multiple sources.

Interviews
Parents, teachers, early caregivers, outside therapists and other service providers can be
sources of information about cognitive processing.

Record Review
Thoroughly review school records, available medical or outside service provider records for
information about cognitive processing.

18
PI 11.36 (8) (b) 5: SENSORY PROCESSING:
5. The child exhibits unusual, inconsistent, repetitive or unconventional responses to sounds, sights,
smells, tastes, touch or movement. The child may have a visual or hearing impairment or both in
addition to sensory processing difficulties associated with autism.

Explanation
Sensory processing involves receiving information about the world around us through our senses.
Information is received in our brain and organized and sorted in an efficient manner. The brain then
uses this information to form our behaviors, emotions, and readiness to perform learning tasks. In
students with autism sensory processing is considered a problem if it interferes with the student’s
ability to function in an expected manner within the environment. This can be manifested through
behavior challenges, emotional outbursts or unwillingness to participate.

The student may exhibit hypersensitivity (over sensitivity or sensory aversion) or hyposensitivity
(under sensitivity or sensory seeking). Hypersensitivity may escalate until the student stops
responding and appears lethargic. Hyposensitivity may also present itself as low arousal to sensory
stimuli, causing the student to appear lethargic.

NOTE: Everyone exhibits sensory processing differences. For these purposes we are concerned
with sensory processing differences that affect or impact the student’s ability to function in the
expected manner in various environments.

Assessment Considerations
Observations
In assessing a student’s sensory processing, observe for hypersensitivity or hyposensitivity
in various learning environments (classroom, gym, cafeteria, hallway, bathrooms,
playground, assemblies, art, music, computer labs, bus, community activities, vocational
sites, etc.) in all of the following sensory areas:

Sensory Areas Examples of Hypersensitivity Examples of Hyposensitivity

Visual (Sight) Closing eyes, squinting, Throwing items, staring
avoidance of visual stimuli. intensely at object, moving
objects or fingers in front of
eyes.
Tactile (Touch) Clothing/food issues, Fidgeting with objects, need to
avoidance of textures, difficulty touch others or objects.
in crowds, overreaction to
unexpected touch, toe walking,
poor hygiene.
Auditory (Hearing) Covering ears, avoiding noisy Not responding to auditory
environments, overreaction to input including sounds and
unexpected sounds such as fire voices, turning volume up loud
alarms or barking dogs. on computers, radios, etc.,
seeking auditory input by
creating noise (tapping pencils,
etc.).
Olfactory (Smell) Plugging nose, verbalizing Smelling items, even those that
discomfort, gagging, vomiting, typically do not have an odor,
19
 ability to smell things sniffing people.
undetectable to others, avoiding
certain odorous foods, people,
or environments.
Gustatory (Taste/Oral) Gagging, vomiting, extremely Mouthing and chewing objects
limited diets, refusal to try new and clothing, craving certain
foods, preference for certain types or flavors of foods, eating
textures/temperature of foods. non-food items.
Vestibular (Movement) Avoids playground/gym Toe walking, spinning,
activities, avoids head swinging, running, bouncing,
movement. fidgety behavior, constant
movement.
Proprioceptive (Sense of body Avoidance of others (for example staying on the fringes of
in space) groups, being last in line), falling off chair, excessive or weak
Note: Proprioceptive atypicalities force on objects or people, stomping feet, banging into people or
are not characterized by hyper or objects, bouncing, jumping, preferring heavy work activities such
hyposensitivity. as carrying heavy items, pushing, pulling, wrapping self up
tightly in blankets, etc., frequent hugging with force.

Interviews
Parents, teachers, including physical education, music, and art teachers, playground and
lunch supervisors, custodians, bus drivers, early caregivers, outside therapists and other
service providers can be sources of information about sensory processing. Ask questions
related to sleep patterns, toileting, dressing, eating habits, hygiene, community participation,
etc. Ask about strategies parents and students have found successful for calming or
arousing.

Record Review
Thoroughly review school records, available medical or outside service provider records for
information related to sensory processing. School records, such as report cards and progress
reports often provide historical information about sensory needs.

20
PI 11.36 (8) (b) (6): BEHAVIORAL REPERTOIRE:
6. The child displays marked distress over changes, insistence on following routines, and a
persistent preoccupation with or attachment to objects. The child’s capacity to use objects in an
age–appropriate or functional manner may be absent, arrested or delayed. The child may have
difficulty displaying a range of interests or imaginative activities or both. The child may exhibit
stereotyped body movements.

Explanation
Students with autism often demonstrate a need for consistency and predictability in daily routines
and learning environments. Due to their challenges in processing language, social, sensory, and
cognitive information, students with autism tend to rely heavily on learned and predictable rules,
routines and structures. Alterations in rules, routines, and structures significantly impact students
with autism. Students may demonstrate rigidity and perseveration in patterns of thinking, and may
exhibit preoccupation with topics, themes, objects, events, or people. This preoccupation often
interferes with their ability to function in the manner expected. Students may have a restricted
range of interests and may resist participation in other activities or discussions about other topics
unless provided additional motivation. Students may use objects or their bodies in unconventional
or repetitive ways.

Assessment Methods and Suggestions

Standardized Tests, Assessments and Checklists
Observations
When assessing this area, observe the student in various learning environments. Students
may demonstrate:
• An all consuming, high interest involving objects, topics, or themes. This can
present as obsessive-compulsive type behavior.
• A restricted or narrow range of interests including unusual interests compared to
their peers.
• Ritualistic actions or behaviors.
• Rigidity in routine, difficulty with change and transitions.
• Insistence on sameness.
• Perfectionism and fear of failure that impact willingness to engage in written
language activities or complete tasks or activities perceived as difficult.
• Difficulty letting go of perseverative thoughts, activities, actions or behaviors, i.e.
“getting stuck”.
• Repetitive motor or vocal patterns such as flapping, rocking, pacing, humming,
picking, chewing, etc.

Interviews
Parents, teachers, early caregivers, outside therapists and other service providers can be
sources of information about the need for routine and consistency. Explore what motivates
the student. Talk about similarities and differences in routines at school, home and the
community.

Record Review
Thoroughly review school records, available medical or outside service provider records for
information about the need for routine and consistency.

21
 Need for Special Education: PI-11.35 (2) - (3)

(2) A child shall be identified as having a disability if the IEP team has determined from an
evaluation conducted under s. 115.782, Stats., that the child has an impairment under s. PI 11.36
that adversely affects the child’s educational performance, and the child, as a result thereof, needs
special education and related services.

(3) As part of an evaluation or re-evaluation under s. 115.782, Stats., conducted by the IEP team in
determining whether a child is or continues to be a child with a disability, the IEP team shall
identify all of the following:

(a) The child’s needs that cannot be met through the regular education program
as structured at the time the evaluation was conducted.
(b) Modifications, if any, that can be made in the regular education program,
such as adaptation of content, methodology or delivery of instruction to meet
the child’s needs identified under par. (a), that will allow the child to access
the general education curriculum and meet the educational standards that
apply to all children.
(c) Additions or modifications, if any, that the child needs which are not
provided through the general education curriculum, including replacement
content, expanded core curriculum or other supports.

To be considered a student with a disability under federal and state special education law, the
student must meet the eligibility criteria for at least one impairment area and, as a result, need
special education. In other words, “disability” means impairment plus need for special education.

As part of an evaluation or reevaluation conducted by the IEP team in determining whether a

student is or continues to be a student with a disability, the IEP team must address three questions:

I. Does the student have needs that cannot be met in regular education as
structured?

In discussing this issue, the IEP team should keep in mind that there is some level of
variability within classrooms which schools must address. The IEP team must examine the
regular education environment and identify the student’s needs that cannot be met in that
environment as structured. If the student’s needs can be met within the regular education
program as structured at the time of the evaluation the IEP team may decide the student
meets the eligibility criteria for the impairment but does not need special education. If the
student’s needs cannot be met in the regular education program as structured at the time of
the evaluation, the IEP team must continue discussion with the second question.

II. What are the modifications, if any, that can be made in the regular education program
to meet the child’s identified needs and that will allow the child to access the general
education curriculum and meet the educational standards that apply to all children
(consider adaptation of content, methodology or delivery of instruction)?

22
 As the IEP team begins to discuss adaptations and/or modifications that may be needed in
regular education, they should consider the following:

• What is the nature of the modification?

• What is involved in implementing the modification? Time to implement? Time
for training? Preparation? Short-term implementation vs. long-term or on-going?
• Can the modification be used with more students than the one being evaluated?
• Is this modification based on the general education classroom curriculum?

Appropriate modifications in the regular education classroom may or may not require
special education and related services. Some modifications may be minimal while others
may be more complex.

A student who has the impairment of autism might require modifications and supports such
as:
• Visual supports, such as picture schedules, checklists, written directions, cue
cards, social narratives, cartooning, visual timers, etc.
• Augmentative communication systems such as a picture point system, voice
output systems, etc.
• Sensory processing supports, such as a sensory diet, sensory breaks, etc.
• Environmental accommodations and adaptations, such as removing visual clutter,
visual defining of boundaries and space, safe quiet areas, and preferential seating.
• Academic adaptations such as fewer items, varied modalities, extended time to
complete tasks, colored overlay sheets, highlighted texts, alternate ways to share
knowledge, audio texts, leveled readers.
• Organizational supports such as graphic organizers, story maps, adapted paper,
timers, etc.
• Alternate environment for completion of tasks and/or breaks.
• Foreshadowing of upcoming activities, including deviations from schedules or
usual routines, and cues or reminders.
• Instruction at a different academic or grade level.
• Access to various modes of technology such as portable word processors,
electronic label makers, computers, Dictaphones, etc.
• Small group vs. large group instruction
• Additional staff support to address safety concerns

This list is not meant to be all inclusive. Like all students, students with autism benefit from
a variety of strategies and supports. Each student with autism has individual needs which
should determine the strategies, supports and supplemental aids and services the IEP team
considers.

III. What are the additions or modifications, if any, that the child needs which are not
provided through the general education curriculum (consider replacement content,
expanded core curriculum or other supports)?

Does the student have needs that are not met in regular education even after that
environment is carefully scrutinized and appropriate modifications are explored? If so, the

23
 IEP team must identify any instruction and supports outside of the regular education
curriculum that the student would need.

Replacement or supplemental content for students with autism might include instruction in:
• Sensory processing strategies/self-regulation strategies.
• Social relation skills.
• Communication skills.
• Self-help and activities of daily living.
• Curriculum aligned to extended grade band standards.
• Community-based skills.
• Decision making or problem solving.
• Self-advocacy skills.
• Vocational skills.
• Safety awareness and skills.

This list is not meant to be all inclusive. Like all students, students with autism benefit from a
variety of strategies and supports. Each student with autism has individual needs which should
determine the strategies, supports and supplemental aids and services the IEP team considers.

If the IEP team determines a student meets the eligibility criteria and has a need for special
education, the student then has, or continues to have, a disability. The next step for the IEP team is
to develop an IEP and determine placement for the student.

A worksheet to guide the determination of “need for special education” can be found in Appendix D
on page 36.

24
 Appendices

A. Evaluation Instruments - Examples

B. Eligibility Criteria Worksheet for Autism

C. Need for Special Education Worksheet

(Adapted from DPI Form ER-1 – Evaluation Report Revised 10/06)

D. Bibliography and Resources

25
 Evaluation Instruments - Examples
Autism/Asperger’s General Diagnostic Tools
Title Company Comments
Autism Diagnostic WPS (Western Psychological • Standardized behavior observation
Observation Services) scale.
Schedule (ADOS) http://portal.wpspublish.com • Requires training to administer.
• Used with toddlers through adults.
• Provides diagnostic information
across ages, developmental levels,
and language skills.
• Takes 35-40 minutes to complete
each of four modules.

Autism Diagnostic WPS (Western Psychological • Clinical assessment interview tool.

Interview, Revised Services) • Requires training to administer.
(ADI-R) http://portal.wpspublish.com • Used with children with mental age
above 2 years.
• Takes about 1 ½ to 2 ½ hours to
administer and score.
Australian Scale for Available free on-line at • Questionnaire designed to identify
Asperger’s www.udel.edu/bkirby/asperger behaviors and abilities indicative of
Syndrome - 1998 Asperger’s Syndrome in school age
children.
• Also in the book “Asperger’s
Syndrome: A Guide for Parents
and Professionals” by Tony
Attwood. Published by Jessica
Kingsley Publishing (1998)

Gilliam’s ProEd, Inc. • Standardized behavior rating scale.

Asperger’s Disorder www.proedinc.com • Used with children aged 5-18.
Scale (GADS) – • Takes about 10-15 minutes to
2001 complete.
• 15-item behavior rating scale
Childhood Autism WPS (Western Psychological designed to identify children with
Rating Scale Services) autism spectrum disorders and
(CARS) - 1988 http://portal.wpspublish.com determine symptom severity
through quantifiable ratings based
on direct observation.
• Requires training to administer.
• Used with children ages 2 and
above. Takes about 15 minutes to
administer.
• Distinguishes autism from other
developmental disabilities.
26
Gilliam Autism ProEd, Inc. • Norm-referenced instrument.
Rating Scale www.proedinc.com • Identifies autism and estimates
(GARS-2) – 2006 severity.
• Used with ages 3-22.
• Takes about 5-10 minutes to
administer.
Social WPS (Western Psychological • Rating scale designed to distinguish
Responsiveness Services) ASD from other child psychiatric
Scale (SRS) http://portal.wpspublish.com conditions.
• Measures severity of ASD
symptoms as they occur in natural
settings.
• Used with children aged 4-18
years.
Social Participation Assessment Tools
Battelle Riverside Publishing • Developmental assessment for
Developmental http://www.riverpub.com early childhood.
Inventory, 2nd • Measures personal-social, adaptive,
Edition (BDI-2) motor, communication, and
cognitive ability.
• Norm referenced.
• Used with children 0-7 years.
Child Development Pearson Education • Norm referenced parent
Inventory (CDI) http://ags.pearsonassessments.com questionnaire.
• Used with children aged 15 months
to 6 years.
DO-WATCH- Brookes Publishing • Social skills checklist.
LISTEN-SAY (2008) http://www.brookespublishing.com • Used with young children.
• In book DO-WATCH-LISTEN-SAY
(2008) by Kathleen Quill.
The New Portage Portage Project • Criterion referenced observation.
Guide 0-6 (Portage) http://www.portageproject.org • Norm referenced parent
questionnaire.
• Used with children aged 18 months
to 6 years.
Social Thinking Social Thinking • In book Thinking About You
Dynamic http://www.socialthinking.com Thinking About Me (2nd Edition,
Assessment 2008) by Michelle Garcia Winner.
Protocol

27
 Communication Assessment Tools
CELF 4 – Pearson Publishing • Used with ages 5-21
Pragamatic Profile http://pearsonassess.com • Provides Criterion Score
CELF Preschoool 2 Pearson Publishing • Used with children aged 3 to six
– Descriptive http://pearsonassess.com years.
Pragmatics Profile • Provides criterion score.
Children’s Pearson Publishing • Identifies children with pragmatic
Communication http://pearsonassess.com language impairments who may
Checklist-2 require further autism assessment.
• Use with children aged 4 years to
16 years 11 months.
Communication Jessica Kingsley Publishers • Use with pre- or non-verbal
Assessment Record http://www.jkp.com students.
• In book Assessing and Developing
Communication and Thinking Skills
in People with Autism and
Communication Difficulties (2005)
by Kate Silver.
Comprehensive Pearson Publishing • Use with ages 3 years to 21 years
Assessment of http://pearsonassess.com 11 months.
Spoken Language • Includes pragmatic language,
(CASL) supralinguistic (abstract language),
lexical/semantic language, and
syntactic language subtests.
Social Language LinguiSystems • Used with ages 6 years to 11 years
Development Test – http://www.linguisystems.com 11 months.
Elementary • A standardized tool that assesses
the social interaction skills of
students
Test of Language Pearson Publishing • Used with ages 5 years to 18 years
Competence – http://pearsonassess.com 11 months.
Expanded (TLC-E) • Assesses abstract elements of
language (e.g. inferences,
ambiguous sentences, figurative
language, etc.)
Test of Problem LinguiSystems • Used with adolescents ages 12
Solving 2 http://www.linguisystems.com years to 17 years, 11 months.
Adolescent (TOPS • Assesses a broad range of critical
2) thinking skills in five different
subtest areas: making inferences,
determining solutions, problem
solving, interpreting perspectives,
and transferring insights.
Test of Problem LinguiSystems • Used with children ages 6 years to
Solving 3 (TOPS 3) http://www.linguisystems.com 11 years, 11 months.

28
 • Provides information on how
students integrate semantic and
linguistic knowledge with
reasoning ability.

Developmental Rates and Sequences Assessment Tools

Battelle Riverside Publishing • Developmental assessment for
Developmental http://www.riverpub.com early childhood.
Inventory, 2nd • Measures personal-social, adaptive,
Edition (BDI-2) motor, communication, and
cognitive ability.
• Norm referenced.
• Used with children 0-7 years.
Child Development Pearson Education • Norm referenced parent
Inventory (CDI) http://ags.pearsonassessments.com questionnaire.
• Used with children aged 15 months
to 6 years.
Mullen Scales of Pearson Education • Norm referenced.
Early Learning http://ags.pearsonassessments.com • Used with children from birth to 68
months.
The New Portage Portage Project • Criterion referenced observation.
Guide 0-6 (Portage) http://www.portageproject.org • Norm referenced parent
questionnaire.
• Used with children aged 18 months
to 6 years.
Cognition Assessment Tools
Battelle Riverside Publishing • Developmental assessment for
Developmental http://www.riverpub.com early childhood.
Inventory, 2nd • Measures personal-social, adaptive,
Edition (BDI-2) motor, communication, and
cognitive ability.
• Norm referenced.
• Used with children 0-7 years.
Behavior Rating Pearson Publishing • Standardized assessment
Inventory of http://pearsonassess.com instrument.
Executive • Completed by caregivers and
Functioning educators.
(BRIEF) • Assesses executive functioning in
both home and school
environments.
• Used with children age 5-18.
Mullen Scales of Pearson Education • Norm referenced.
Early Learning http://ags.pearsonassessments.com • Used with children from birth to 68
months.

29
 Sensory Processing Assessment Tools
The New Portage Portage Project • Criterion referenced observation.
Guide 0-6 http://www.portageproject.org • Norm referenced parent
questionnaire.
• Used with children aged 18 months
to 6 years.
Sensory Processing WPS (Western Psychological • Norm referenced.
Measure (SPM) Services) • Measures sensory functioning at
http://portal.wpspublish.com home, school and in community.
• Home and Main Classroom forms
take 10-15 minutes to complete.
Sensory Profile - Pearson Publishing • Classification system based on
1999 http://pearsonassess.com normative information.
• Multiple tools including caregiver
questionnaire and school
companion.
Behavioral Repertoire Assessment Tools
Gilliam’s ProEd, Inc. • Standardized behavior rating scale.
Asperger’s Disorder www.proedinc.com • Used with children aged 5-18.
Scale (GADS) – • Takes about 10-15 minutes to
2001 complete.

Gilliam Autism ProEd, Inc. • Norm-referenced instrument.

Rating Scale www.proedinc.com • Identifies autism and estimates
(GARS-2) – 2006 severity.
• Used with ages 3-22.
• Takes about 5-10 minutes to
administer.

30
 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction INSTRUCTIONS: This form is provided to assist school district
ELIGIBILITY CHECKLIST individualized education program (IEP) teams in determining if a student
appropriately can be determined to have an impairment under Chapter 115,
AUTISM
Wis. Stats., and the eligibility criteria established in PI 11.36, Wis. Admin.
ELG-AUT-001 (Rev. 07-09) Code. The IEP team should complete this form to document determination
of eligibility for special education services and keep it on file with the
This form is provided for local use only.
student record.
Student Name Date of Eligibility Determination

Criteria for impairment in the area of autism can be documented as follows:

Section I. (Both must be checked Yes.)

Yes No The child displays difficulties or differences or both in interacting with people and events. The child may be unable to establish
and maintain reciprocal relationships with people. The child may seek consistency in environmental events to the point of
exhibiting rigidity in routines.

Yes No The child displays problems which extend beyond speech and language to other aspects of social communication, both
receptively, and expressively. The child’s verbal language may be absent or, if present, lacks the usual communicative form
which may involve deviance or delay or both. The child may have a speech or language disorder or both in addition to
communication difficulties associated with autism.

Section II. (At least one must be checked Yes.)

Yes No The child exhibits delays, arrests, or regressions in motor, sensory, social or learning skills. The child may exhibit precocious or
advanced skill development, while other skills may develop at normal or extremely depressed rates. The child may not follow
developmental patterns in the acquisition of skills.

Yes No The child exhibits abnormalities in the thinking process and in generalizing. The child exhibits strengths in concrete thinking
while difficulties are demonstrated in abstract thinking, awareness and judgment. Perseverant thinking and impaired ability to
process symbolic information may be present.

Yes No The child exhibits unusual, inconsistent, repetitive or unconventional responses to sounds, sights, smells, tastes, touch or
movement. The child may have a visual or hearing impairment or both in addition to sensory processing difficulties associated
with autism.

Yes No The child displays marked distress over changes, insistence on following routines, and a persistent preoccupation with or
attachment to objects. The child’s capacity to use objects in an age-appropriate or functional manner may be absent, arrested or
delayed. The child may have difficulty displaying a range of interests or imaginative activities or both. The child may exhibit
stereotyped body movements.
 Need for Special Education*

Yes 1. Does the student have needs that cannot be met in regular education as
structured?
If yes, list the needs below. Use reverse side or attach additional pages if needed.

No

If no, there is no need for special education.

Yes 2. Are there modifications that can be made in the regular education program to allow the student
access to general education curriculum and to meet the educational standards that apply to all
students? (Consider adaptation of content, methodology and/or delivery of instruction.)
If yes,
A. List modifications that do not require special education. Use reverse side of
page or attach additional pages if needed.

B. List modifications that require special education. Use reverse side of page or
attach additional pages if needed.

No

If no, go to question 3.
3. Are there additions or modification that the child needs which are not provided
through the general education curriculum? (Consider replacement content,
Yes expanded core curriculum, and/or other supports.)
If yes, list below. Use reverse side of page or attach additional pages if needed.

No

In order for the IEP team to determine that the student needs special education, the IEP team
must answer “yes” to question 1 AND list needs under 2B and/or 3.
*Adapted from DPI Form ER-1 – Evaluation Report Revised 10/06
32
Bibliography and Resources

American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,
4th edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.

Attwood, T. (1999) Asperger’s Syndrome: A Guide for Parents and Professionals. Philadelphia,
PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Baker, J. (2003) Social Skills Training for Children and Adolescents with Asperger’s Syndrome.
Shawnee Mission, KS: Autism Asperger Publishing Co.

Bellini, S. (2006). Building Social Relationships: A Systematic Approach to Teaching Social

Interaction Skills to Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Other Social
Difficulties. Shawnee Mission, KS: Autism Asperger Publishing Co.

Coucouvanis, J. (2005). Super Skills Shawnee Mission, KS: Autism Asperger Publishing Co.

Koegel, R. & Koegel, L. (1996). Teaching Children With Autism, Strategies for Initiating Positive
Interactions and Improving Learning Opportunities. Baltimore, MA: Paul H. Brookes Publishing
Co.

Kranowitz, C. (1998). The Out-of-Sync Child, Recognizing and Coping with Sensory Integration
Dysfunction. New York, NY: The Berkley Publishing Company.

Liaupsin, C., Scott, T., and Nelson, C. (2000). Functional Behavioral Assessment: An Interactive
Training Module. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.

Lord, C. and McGee, J., National Research Council (2001). Educating Children with Autism.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press

Myles, B. and Simpson, R. (1998). Educating Children and Youth with Autism, Strategies for
Effective Practice. Austin, Texas: PRO-ED.

Myles, B et. al (2004) The Hidden Curriculum: Practical Solutions for Understanding Unstated
Rules in Social Situations¸ Shawnee Mission, KS: Autism Asperger Publishing Co.

O’Neill, R., Horner, R., Albin, R., Sprague, J., Storey, K. and Newton, J. (1997). Functional
Assessment and Program Development for Problem Behavior: A Practical Handbook, 2nd ed.
Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

Volkman, F., Klin, A., Paul, R. and Cohen, D. (2005). Handbook of Autism and Pervasive
Developmental Disorders: Assessment, Interventions, and Policy, Vol. 2. New York, NY: John
Wiley & Sons.

Websites:

Autism Society of America: www.autism-society.org

Autism Society of Wisconsin: www.asw4autism.org
33
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction home page: http://dpi.wi.gov
Autism: http://dpi.wi.gov/sped/autism.html
Cognitive Disability: http://dpi.wi.gov/sped/cd.html
Speech/language disability: http://dpi.wi.gov/sped/speech.html
Functional Behavioral Assessment: http://dpi.wi.gov/sped/sbfba.html
Special Education Index (includes links to disability areas, Information Updates (bulletins),
What’s New, statutes, and many other resources):
http://dpi.wi.gov/sped/tm-specedtopics.html

34