1 760 Pa3759 2001
1 760 Pa3759 2001
by
1. IN~TRODUCTION
Over the past thirty years economic road investment and maintenance models have
been developed to assist countries with road investment planning. The main
models used have been TRL's Road Transport Investment Model (RTIiM) and the
World Bank's Highway Design and Maintenance Standards Model (HDM). 1DM-
III (Watanatada, et al, 1987 and Paterson, 1987) has been used for over two
Secretariat within the World Road Association (PIARC) based in Paris. The study
has been carried out to extend the scope of the H1DM-Il1 model and to provide a
friendly software tools. This has resulted in the development of the Highway
analysis software known as H1)M-4, and the associated knowledge and models
The scope of HDM-4 has been broadened considerably beyond traditional project
appraisals, to provide a powerful system for the analysis of road management and
some limited data collection was undertaken. Wherever possible, creative new
2. BACKGROUND
The first move towards producing a road project appraisal model was made in 1968
by the World Bank. The first conceptual model was produced in response to terms
conjunction with the Transport and Road Research Laboratory (TRRL) and the
Laboratoire Centrale des Ponts et Chauss~es (LCPC). Thereafter, the World Bank
was a considerable advance over other models used for examining the interactions
between road construction costs, maintenance costs and vehicle operating costs.
However, the H1CM model highlighted areas where more research was needed to
Following this, TRRL, in collaboration with the World Bank, undertook a major
field study in Kenya to investigate the deterioration of paved and unpaved roads as
results of this study were used by TRRL, to produce the first prototype version of
(Abaynayaka, et al, 1977). In 1976, the World Bank funded further developments
of the HCM at MIT which produced an extended version of the model that was
sensitivity analysis of key variables such as discount rate and traffic growth. The
work resulted in the first version of the Highway Design and Maintenance
• The Caribbean Study (by TRRL). Investigated the effects of road geometry
• India Study (by the Central Road Research Institute - CRRI). Studied
• Brazil Study (funded by UNDP). Extended the validity of all of the model
Parallel model development continued with TRRL developing RTIIM2 (Parsley and
Robinson, 1982), whilst the World Bank developed a more comprehensive model
incorporating the findings from all previous studies and this led to H1DM-I11
TRRL. Later, a micro version of HiDM-111 was produced by the World Bank
1994, the World Bank produced two further versions of HDM: HDM-Q,
incorporating the effects of traffic congestion into the H1DM-I11 program (Hoban,
(Archondo-Callao, 1994).
Both RTIN43 and H1DM-I11 have been used extensively, and have been instrumental
countries, and for optimising economic benefits to road users under different levels
of expenditures. They provide road investment analysis tools which are applicable
in a range of climates and conditions. However, it was recognised that there was a
wider range of pavements and conditions of use, and also to reflect modern
The relationships in RTIM3 and H1DM-Ill were based on the results of studies
carried out in the late 1970's and early 1980's. Although many of the road
deterioration models were still relevant, there was a need to incorporate the results
of research that has been undertaken around the world in the intervening period. In
the case of the vehicle operating cost relationships, it was recognised that vehicle
technology has improved dramatically over the past 10 years with the result that
typical operating costs are now significantly less than those predicted by the
relationships.
Most of the relationships in these models are based on the results of research
begun to make use of HDM-111. It was therefore seen that there was a need both to
traffic congestion effects, cold climate effects, a wider range of pavement types and
In the application of HDM-4, the following functions are considered in the highway
management process:
* Planning
* Programming
* Preparation
* Operations
3.1 Planning
Planning involves the analysis of the road system as a whole, typically requiring
road development and preservation under various budget and economic scenarios.
Predictions may be made of road network conditions under a vari ety of funding
levels together with forecasts of required expenditure under defined budget heads.
physical condition.
The results of the planning exercise are of most interest to senior policy makers in
the road sector, both political and professional. Work will often be undertaken by a
3.2 Programming
works and expenditure programmes in which those sections of the network likely
defined budget heads, for different types of road works and for each road section.
the road works in order to find the best use of the constrained budget. Typical
3.3 Preparation
This is the short-term planning stage where road schemes are packaged for
implementation. At this stage, designs are refined and prepared in more detail;,
bills of quantities and detailed costing are made, together with work instructions
and contracts. Detailed specifications and costing are likely to be drawn up, and
detailed cost-benefit analysis may be carried out to confirm the feasibility of the
final scheme. Works on adjacent road sections may be combined into packages of
a size that is cost-effective for execution. Typical preparation activities are the
detailed design of an overlay scheme; the detailed design of major works such as a
junction or alignment improvement, lane addition, etc. For these activities, budgets
3.4 Operations
These activities cover the on-going operation of a road agency. Decisions about
equipment and materials, the recording of work completed, and use of this
Table 1
Change in management process
works have been prepared on a historical basis in which each year's budget is
based upon that for the year before, with an adjustment for inflation. Under such a
regime, there is no way of telling whether funding levels, or the detailed allocation,
are either adequate or fair. Clearly there is a requirement for an objective needs-
based approach using knowledge of the content, structure and condition of the
summarised in Table 2 and provides the framework within which HDM-4 needs to
be considered.
Table 2
Role of HDM-4 within the management cycle
4. HDM-4 APPLICATIONS
There are three main areas of application for HDM-4 which can be undertaken
* Project analysis
* Programme analysis
* Strategy analysis
Project analysis is concerned with the evaluation of one or more road projects or
investment options. The application analyses a road link or section with user-
selected treatments, with associated costs and benefits, projected annually over the
analysis period. Economic indicators are determined for the different investment
options.
and cold climates. Road user cost relationships include impacts on road safety.
It is in the area of programme and strategy analysis that F1DDM-4 offers significant
the candidate roads have been identified, programme analysis is used to compare
the life cycle costs predicted under the existing regimen of pavement management
(i.e. 'without' project case) against the life cycle costs predicted for the alternative
This provides the basis for estimating the economic benefits that would be derived
index for prioritisation purposes. Two examples are given in Tables 3 and 4.
Indices such as the NIPV, economic rate of return (ERR), or predicted pavement
condition attributes (e.g. road roughness) are not recommended as ranking criteria.
benefits for each additional unit of expenditure (i.e. maximise net benefits for each
Table 3
Sample output from programme analysis (format 1)
Priority Road Length Province Type of Scheduled Cost Cumulative
Rank Section (kin) or District Road Work Year $m S$m
1 N11-2 20.5 2 Resealing 2000 5.4 5.4
2 N4-7 23.5 7 Overlay 4Omm 2000 10.9 16.3
3 N2-5 12.5 5 Reconstruct 2000 8.6 24.9
4 R312-1 30 4 Widen 4 lane 2000 31.4 56.3
5 R458-3 36.2 3 Overlay 60mm 2000 16.3 72.6
Table 4
Sample output from programme analysis (format 2)
2000 2001 2002 2003
Priority Road Length Province Road Cost Road Cost Road Cost.Road cost
Rank Section '(kin) or District Work $m Work $m Work $m Work $
1 N1-2 20.5 2 RESEAL 5.4 R.M. 0.185 R.M. 0.185 R.M. 0.185
2 N4-7 23.5 7 OVL-4OMMV 10.9 R.M. 0.212 R.M. 0.212 R.M. 0.212
3 N2-5 12.5 5 RECON 8.6 R.M. 0.113 R.M. 0.1 13 R.M. 0.113
4 R312-1 30 4 WIDEN-4 31.4 R.M. 0.180 R.M. 0.180 R.M. 0.180
5 R458-3 36.2 3 OVL6OMM 16.3 R.M. 0.217 R.M. 0.217 R.M. 0.217
18 N4-16 32.1 6 R.M. 0.289 RECON 22.8 R.M. 0.289 R.M. 0.289
17 Ri13-23 22.4 4 R.M. 0.134 OVI-4OMMV 9.7 R.M. 0.134 R.M. 0.134
18 N521-5 45.2 2 R.M. 0.407 WIDEN-4 41.3 R.M. 0.407 R.M. 0.407
28 N1-6 30.2 4 R.M. 0.272 R.M. 0.272 RESEAL 8.2 R.M. 0.272
29 N7-9 17.8 3 INLAY 0.240 R.M. 0.200 OVL-6OMMV 9.2 R.M. 0.160
30 F2140-8 56.1 1 PATCH 0.202 R.M. 0.202 RECON 34.9 R.M. 0.168
Note: RM =Routine Maintenance
its entire road network asset. Thus, strategy analysis deals with entire networks or
include; the main (or trunk) road network, the rural (or feeder) road network, urban
motorways (expressways), all paved (or unpaved) roads, different road classes, etc.
in order to predict the medium to long term requirements of an entire road network
categories of the road network defined according to the key attributes that most
model individual road sections in the strategy analysis application, most road
thereby making it cumbersome to individually model each road segment. The road
network matrix can be defined by users to represent the most important factors
affecting transport costs in the country. A typical road network matrix could be
For example, a road network matrix could be modelled using; three traffic
categories, (high, medium, low), two pavement types (asphalt concrete, surface
treatments), and three pavement condition levels (good, fair, poor). In this case, it
is assumed that the environment throughout the study area is similar and that the
road administration is responsible for one road class (for example, main roads).
The resulting road network matrix for this would therefore comprise (3 x 2 x 3 =
representative pavement sections that can be used in a strategy analysis. The trade-
off is usually between a simple representative road network matrix that would give
rather coarse results compared against a detailed road network matrix with several
include:
class (main, feeder and urban roads, etc.) or by administrative region (see
Figure 4).
* Policy studies such as impact of changes to the axle load limit, pavement
cm 4.0
mu
a).
Target
U,3.
1
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 v
205
2005 5
06
2006
Figure 1
Effect of funding levels on road network performance
Budget Allocations
~~~~~~~~~~~~Feeder
7.0
Roads
$30mlyr
u) 6.0
U)
- - - - - - --
a) Secondary
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Roads
$35m/yr
0
Figure 2
Effect of budget allocations on sub-network performance
Figure 4
OPtimal budget allocations
to sub-networks
The main difference
between strategy
analysis and Programme
in which road analysis is the way
links and sections
are physically
identified. Programme
deals with individual analysis
links and sections
that are unique
from the road physical units identifiable
network throughout
the analysis.
In strategy analysis,
the road
The Highway Development and Management Tool - HDMV-4
system essentially loses its individual link and section characteristics by grouping
all road segments with similar characteristics into the road network matrix
categories.
For both strategy and programme analysis, the problem can be posed as one of
the network that optimises an objective function under budget constraint. If, for
example, the objective function is to maximise the Net Present Value (NPV), the
problem can be defined as: "Select that combination of treatment options for
sections that maximises NPV for the whole network subject to the sum of the
The three analysis tools described above operate on data defined in one of four data
managers:
The road deterioration and works effects (RDWE) models are described in detail in
Volume 6 of the HDM-4 series of documents (Morosiuk, et al, 2001), whilst the
RUE and SEE models are similarly described in Volume 7 (Bennett and
• Bituminous
* Concrete
• Unsealed
Within each class of pavement, broad definitions of the road surfacing and the base
There are effectively five generic base types, including those which allow for
Table 5
HDM-4 pavement classification system
Surface Surface class Pavement type Surface Base
category j p~ype t_______
AMGB GB
AMAB AB
AMSB AM SB
AMAP __ _ AP
Bitumninous STGB GB
STAB AB
STSB ST SB
__________ STAP __ _ _ _ AP
JPGB GB
JPAB AB
JPSB3 JP SB
JPAP AP
Paved JPRB ____ RB
JRGB GB
JRAB AB
Concrete JRB JR SB
JRAP AP
MRB __ _ RB
CRGB GB
CRAB AB
CRSB CR SB
CRAP AP
CRRB ____ RB
GRUP~ GR
Unpaved Unsealed EAUP EA UP
_________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ SAUP SA _ _ _ _
pavement type which are used to model the performance of the roads over the user-
Table 6
Pavement defects modelled in HDWM-4
simulate in the modelling the effects of various types of roadworks during the
analysis period. The option of doing nothing for a road over a period of, typically
The term "roadworks" is used to embrace any change to the physical characteristics
of a road and may embrace operations ranging from simple maintenance, such as
cleaning detritus from the road surface, to the construction of a new road link. One
which over an analysis period, will deliver the optimum solution for a given
carried out. Benefits of roadworks can be almost immediate or longer term and
arise from reduced society costs (vehicle operation, environmental effects) and/or
several years and are usually classified as preventive, resurfacing, overlay and
reconstruction.
Intervention criteria are used to determine the timing and limits on the works to be
intervals of seven years) or points in time for maintenance works, and at a fixed
time (for example, widen in the year 2010) for improvement and construction
threshold levels specified by the user. For example, when the roughness of the
The modelling of Road User Effects (RUE) in HDM-4 comprises analysis of the
following:
Separate relationships are used for the different vehicle classes specified by the
* Motor cycles
* Passenger cars
• Utilities
* Trucks
* Buses
There are 16 base motorised vehicle types pre-defined in HBDM-4. For example,
for passenger cars, small, medium and large types are defined. In addition to
* Pedestrians
• Bicycles
* Cycle rickshaws
* Animal carts
* Tractors
the characteristics of each type of vehicle and the geometry, surface type and
current condition of the road, under both free flow and congested traffic conditions.
The operating costs are obtained by multiplying the various resource quantities by
the unit costs or prices, which are specified by the user in financial or economic
terms. Financial costs represent the actual costs incurred by transport operators in
owning and operating vehicles over the road. Economic costs represent the real
costs to the economy of that ownership and operation, where adjustments are made
to allow for market price distortions such as taxes, subsidies, foreign exchange
• Fuel consumption
* Lubricating oil consumption
* Tyre wear
* Parts consumption
* Maintenance labour hours
* Depreciation
* Interest
* Crew hours
* Overheads
working time, and cargo holding hours. Travel time costs are expressed more
seriously damaged unsealed roads are also included in the total amount of
Non-motorised transport (NMT) modes play a major role in moving passengers and
freight in many countries. The use of NMVT is increasing in some regions mainly
and the environmental impacts arising from the ever-increasing use of motorised
transport (MT) has highlighted the need for better provision of NM\T facilities.
This has led to the recognition that the fulil range of transport needs in many
A formal method has been developed for calculating the operating costs incurred
by NMT on roads and thereby for estimating the benefits derived by NMT from
road improvements (Odoki and Kerali, 1999). The presence of NMT can influence
the speed of motorised transport, thereby affecting the operating costs of motorised
vehicles. In addition, policies such as road improvements influence the costs and
The -HDM-4 system allows users to define a series of look-up tables for accident
rates. These are basically broad, macro descriptions of the expected accident rates
defined according to a particular set of road and traffic attributes (for example, road
type, traffic level and flow pattern, presence of NMT, and geometry class). For
each road type or intersection type, users are required to specify the accident rate
for each severity (that is, fatal, injury or damage only) in terms of the numbers of
accident rates can be changed using the road type or intersection type. Thus it is
possible to analyse the change in total numbers of accidents and the costs resulting
The Social and Environmental Effects (SEE) models in HDM-4 are for the analysis
of
* Energy balance
* Vehicle emissions
projects and policies that minimise total life cycle energy use and vehicle exhaust
Energy consumption models have been incorporated for estimating the total life
cycle energy consumption due to road works, vehicle operation and vehicle
production. These are calculated in terms of both national and global energy
consumption totals.
Vehicle emission relationships have been developed for estimating volumes of the
sulphur dioxide, lead and particulates. The relationships are based on a number of
parameters including pavement condition, road alignment, speed limits and road
cross-section.
6. CALIBRATION
HDM-4 simulates fuiture changes to the road system from current conditions. The
* How well the data provided to the model represent the reality of the current
conditions and influencing factors, as understood by the model.
* How well the predictions of the model fit the real behaviour and interactions
between various factors for the variety of conditions to which it is applied.
The application of the HDM-4 model thus involves two important steps.
The relationships in HDMI-4 model have individual calibration factors. The user
can adjust these' factors so that the predictions given by the model reflect the
7. REFERENCES
CRRI, (1982). Road user cost study in India. Final Report, Central Road Research
Institute, New Delhi, India.
PARSLEY, L L and ROBINSON R (1982). The TRRL, road investment model for
developing countries (RTIM2). TRLRL Laboratory Report 1057. Transport and
Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, UK.